Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Maxillofacial Development”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 415 records · Page 23Linked to original sources

Comparison of human dental and craniofacial maturation on prenatal profile radiographs.

The present study reveals new data concerning the prenatal interrelationship between maturation of teeth and basicranial bones. By using radiographs of the mid-sagittal tissue segment of 43 human craniums, the developmental relationship between a well-defined stage of the central maxillary incisor development and the development of the basicranium was determined. Histological controls were performed to verify the radiographic findings. The study shows a close connection between the incisor development and the cranial development. Furthermore, comparisons are performed to the generally used parameters for prenatal growth, i.e. the crown-rump length (CRL) and the gestational age (GA). A thorough understanding of developmental interactions between the teeth and cranium is important for the understanding of normal, as well as pathological craniofacial development, including tooth development.

Embryonic and Fetal Development↗

Evolutionary issues in craniofacial biology.

This overview discusses evolution in the context of craniofacial development and developmental processes. It begins with a discussion of the origins of the craniofacial tissues in the dentine and bone of the dermal denticles of the Ordovician jawless vertebrates, followed by a brief discussion of the mechanisms responsible for the evolution of the jaws and the origin of vertebrate dentition. Then the unique neural crest cell origin of the craniofacial skeletogenic and odontogenic tissues is discussed with emphasis on the constancy of rostrocaudal polarization of the skeletogenic cranial neural crest. Given this constancy, the variation in the craniofacial region that occurs across the vertebrates must arise because of epigenetic interactions that evoke the differentiation of craniofacial tissues. These are discussed in the context of epigenetic cascades of epithelial-mesenchymal interactions and how such epigenetic control has itself evolved. Although several mechanisms are considered, emphasis is placed on variation of the timing of development processes (heterochrony).

Animals↗

Growth potential of cranial suture bone autograft. II. An experimental microscopic investigation in young rabbits.

On rabbit sucklings a coronal suture-bone graft, covered by periosteum and dura, was transplanted into an experimental unilateral premaxillo-maxillary bone and suture defect. In 21 animals microscopical analysis was carried out using triple fluorochrome vital labelling over a period from the 3rd to the 36th postoperative day. In another 7 animals conventional histological methods were used. The grafts were readily incorporated and during the second postoperative week longitudinal sutural growth was fully restored as compared to the unoperated control side and growth far exceeded that of the original coronal suture.

Animals↗

The role of fibroblast growth factor (FGF) and type beta transforming growth factor (TGF-beta 1-beta 2-beta 3) during rat craniofacial development.

Growth factors seem to be part of a complex cellular signalling language, in which individual growth factors are the equivalents of the letters that compose words. According to this analogy, informational content lies, not in an individual growth factor, but in the entire set of growth factors and others signals to which a cell is exposed. The ways in which growth factors exert their combinatorial effects are becoming clearer as the molecular mechanisms of growth factors actions are being investigated. A number of related extracellular signalling molecules that play widespread roles in regulating development in both invertebrates and vertebrates constitute the Fibroblast Growth Factor (FGF) and type beta Transforming Growth Factor (TGF beta). The latest research literature about the role and fate of these Growth factors and their influence in the craniofacial bone growth ad development is reviewed.

Animals↗

[Dental age in dependence on the stage of selected physiological developmental parameters].

Result from a cross-sectional study on schoolchildren (aged 7 to 15 years) from Jena will be represented the intercorrelations between the dental age and choice developmental criteria. Moreover we investigated the influence of a social factor (rank among siblings of the family) to the level of development of the teeth. It can be shown that the dental age is relatively independent of the level of physical development of children, but there is a rather strictly correlation with chronological age. It makes demands for an interdisciplinary investigation, to get differentiate insights into ontogenetical processes of growth and development especially in children and youth.

Adolescent↗

Dynamic responses in adult and infant monkey craniums during occlusion and mastication.

Using occlusion without food as a basis, this study elucidated the dynamic responses and associated buffer mechanisms in the monkey cranium and its component bones during mastication. In addition, investigations were carried out on the relationship of these factors to the growth and development of the cranium. Using strain gauges, the masticatory buffer capacity and dynamic responses in the bone were investigated from the standpoint of the magnitude and direction of strain in the individual bones of the cranium. Compared with the occlusion without food, there were greater stresses during mastication in the bones of both the masticating and non-masticating sides of the cranium. These stresses were greater when masticating hard than soft foods, and greater in the cranium of the adult than infant monkey. On the masticating side of the cranium, the buffer effect to masticatory forces in the adult cranium was carried out by the inherent form of each bone in response to the firmness of the food, while in the infant cranium it was carried out by the entire cranium independent of the firmness of the food. On the non-masticating side of the cranium in both the adult and infant craniums, the zygomatic arch, temporal bone, and the bones of the temporomandibular joint region balanced the masticatory forces of the masticating side of the cranium, and played an important role in buffering these forces. The direction of the principal strain arising in the bones of the infant cranium corresponded to the direction of growth and development of the respective bone. However, in spite of the fact that large strains were observed in each bone on the non-masticating side during mastication of hard foods, the strains were very small on this side during mastication of soft foods. Consequently, it is necessary to masticate hard foods in order to promote the growth and development of the cranial bones. Viscoelasticity in the cranial bones could be explained by a three-element model.

Animals↗