Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Laparoscopes”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 415 records · Page 23Linked to original sources
PubMed1995

Imaging of the common bile duct during laparoscopic cholecystectomy: sonography versus videofluoroscopic cholangiography.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this prospective study was to compare the accuracies of laparoscopic sonography and laparoscopic videofluoroscopic cholangiography in detecting common bile duct stones and in identifying ductal anomalies during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Ninety-five patients who underwent laparoscopic videofluoroscopic cholecystectomy were prospectively studied with laparoscopic sonography and laparoscopic videofluoroscopic cholangiography. The number of successful studies, the time required to complete the study, and complications resulting from the study were recorded. The biliary system was evaluated for complete visualization of the common bile duct, visualization of the cystic duct, ductal anomalies, maximum diameter of the common bile duct, and common bile duct stones and/or debris. Also determined was whether laparoscopic sonographic findings altered operative management. RESULTS: Laparoscopic sonography was successfully performed in 93 of 95 patients, and laparoscopic videofluoroscopic cholangiography was successfully performed in 90 of 95 patients. The time required to complete laparoscopic sonography ranged from 3 to 18 min (mean +/- SD, 8 +/- 3 min), and that required to complete laparoscopic cholangiography ranged from 5 to 28 min (mean +/- SD, 14 +/- 6 min). Laparoscopic sonography visualized the complete common bile duct in 84 of 93 patients, and laparoscopic cholangiography did so in 86 of 90 patients. Laparoscopic sonography showed the cystic duct in 87 of 93 patients, and laparoscopic cholangiography did so in 80 of 90 patients. Laparoscopic sonography showed no ductal anomalies in any of the 93 patients. Laparoscopic cholangiography showed ductal variants in 13 of 90 patients; however, 11 of the variants were proximal to the sonographic scan plane. Laparoscopic sonography showed common bile duct stones in 12 of 93 patients, and laparoscopic cholangiography did so in five of 90 patients. Laparoscopic sonography altered operative management in two of 93 patients. CONCLUSION: Our results show that laparoscopic sonography is as accurate as laparoscopic videofluoroscopic cholangiography in visualizing the common bile duct and cystic duct and in detecting common bile duct stones. However, the data are too limited to determine whether laparoscopic sonography is as accurate as laparoscopic cholangiography in detecting ductal anomalies.

Adult↗
PubMed2001

The need for training opportunities in advanced laparoscopic surgery.

BACKGROUND: There is controversy regarding the amount of training necessary to safely perform advanced laparoscopic surgery. General surgical residency often provides only a low volume of advanced laparoscopic cases and there is growing interest in nonaccredited fellowships focused on laparoscopic surgery. OBJECTIVE: To assess surgical residents' perception of the need for training in advanced laparoscopic surgery in addition to that provided in a standard general surgical residency. METHODS: A 15-item questionnaire was mailed to 985 physicians who either were Society of American Gastrointestinal Endoscopic Surgeons (SAGES) candidate members or had attended a SAGES resident course in 1998 or 1999. For the purposes of the survey, laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication, laparoscopic herniorrhaphy, laparoscopic splenectomy, and laparoscopic colectomy were chosen as advanced procedures. RESULTS: Of the 85 responses obtained, 81% were from respondents who were at the postgraduate fourth-year (PG4) level or higher. Furthermore, 58% of the respondents had taken a course in advanced laparoscopic surgery outside their residency program. The respondents believed that to perform the procedures safely and with confidence on entering practice, they needed to do at least eight each of the selected laparoscopic procedures. As reported, 45% of the respondents had performed three or fewer laparoscopic hernias; 60% had performed three or fewer laparoscopic Nissen fundoplications; 81% had performed three or fewer laparoscopic colectomies; and 86% had performed three or fewer splenectomies. Only 32% of the residents expected to perform more than 10 laparoscopic Nissen fundoplications, only 10% expected to perform more than 10 colectomies, and only 4% expected to perform more than 10 splenectomies before completing their residency. Many respondents (65%) said they would pursue an additional year of advanced laparoscopic training if it were available. In programs unaffiliated with a fellowship in advanced laparoscopic surgery, 65% of the residents were concerned that such a fellowship would interfere with residency training in laparoscopic surgery. In comparison, only 24% of the residents in programs affiliated with a fellowship in advanced laparoscopic surgery believed that the fellowship interfered with their training, whereas 47% of the residents in programs affiliated with a fellowship in advanced laparoscopic surgery thought that the fellowship had no impact on their training. CONCLUSIONS: Residents clearly perceive a need for additional training in advanced laparoscopic surgery. Residents from programs without a laparoscopic fellowship are concerned about a negative impact on their experience from a laparoscopic fellow, but residents from programs with a laparoscopic fellowship are neutral about the impact of a fellow.

Clinical Competence↗
PubMed2003

Laparoscopic versus open hemicolectomy.

AIM: In the last decade, laparoscopic procedures are applied to the treatment of almost all colonic diseases, including both benign and malignant lesions. Focusing our attention to the laparoscopic operative technique, we compare the perioperative results and the oncological outcomes of laparoscopic hemicolectomy with those after open conventional hemicolectomy. METHODS: This prospective non randomized study is based on a series of 469 consecutive patients (73.6% with malignant lesions) operated on by the same surgical team following the same type of surgical technique, for laparoscopic and open approach, to perform right (RH) and left (LH) hemicolectomy, respectively, excluding segmental resections, emergency operations as well as transverse colon, splenic flexure and recurrent carcinomas. The treatment modality was selected by the patients after reading the informed consent form. Conversion rate to open surgery (for the laparoscopic group) and causes were assessed. Statistical significance (p) for operative time, resumption of gastrointestinal functions, length of stay, complications, perioperative mortality, as well as length of specimen, number of lymph-nodes harvest, incidence of local recurrences and distant metastases, and survival probability analysis in malignant cases, was assessed between the 2 groups (laparoscopic and open). RESULTS: From March 1992 to February 2003, 166 patients underwent RH and 303 LH. In the RH group, 108 patients underwent laparoscopic approach and 58 underwent open surgery (26 vs 13 for benign lesions and 82 vs 45 for adenocarcinomas, respectively). LH was performed by laparoscopy in 202 patients and by laparotomy in 101 (55 vs 30 for benign lesions and 147 vs 71 for adenocarcinomas, respectively). There were no conversions to open surgery in laparoscopic RH, while 10 patients (4.9%) in the laparoscopic LH group required conversion: 3 of 34 performed for diverticular disease and 7 of 147 performed for malignancy. Mean operative time for laparoscopic surgery was longer than for open surgery (182 vs 140 min for RH and 222 vs 190 min for LH, respectively), but with increasing experience this decreased significantly. Mean hospital stay in patients who underwent laparoscopic procedures was significantly shorter both in RH and LH groups (9.2 vs 13.2 days and 9.9 vs 13.2 days, respectively). Similar major complication rates were observed between the 2 laparoscopic and open groups (1.8% vs 1.7% for RH and 4.1% vs 4.9% for LH, respectively). Follow-up time ranged between 12 and 109 months (mean, 57.3 months) in RH groups and between 12 and 111 months (mean, 57.5 months) in LH groups. The follow-up dropout was of only 3 patients after RH (in the laparoscopic group) and 5 after LH (3 in the laparoscopic group and 2 in the open group). The local recurrence rate was lower after laparoscopic surgery in both arms (7% vs 8.8% for RH and 3.3% vs 7% for LH, respectively), but the differences were not statistically significant. Two port site recurrences were observed in the laparoscopic groups, 1 after a Dukes D palliative RH and 1 after a Dukes C LH converted to open surgery (1.7% and 0.9%, respectively). Metachronous metastases rates were similar between the laparoscopic and open groups (20.9% vs 17.6% for RH and 4.4% vs 5.3% for LH, respectively). Cumulative survival probability (CSP) at 72 months after laparoscopic RH was 0.791 as compared to 0.765 after open surgery (p=0.326) and 0.956 after laparoscopic LH as compared to 0.877 after open surgery (p=0.115). CSP for Dukes stage A, B and C in the laparoscopic RH group was 0.875, 0.846, and 0.727 as compared to 0.9 (p=0.815), 0.889 (p=0.87), and 0.6 (p=0.183) after open surgery, respectively. CSP for Dukes stage A, B and C in the laparoscopic LH group was 0.1, 0.966, and 0.885 as compared to 0.1 (p=0.936), 0.944 (p=0.466), and 0.7 (p=0.072) after open surgery, respectively. CONCLUSION: These results suggest that laparoscopic hemicolectomy for both benign and malignant lesions can be performed safely. Oncological outcomes were comparable with those of open surgery.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2005

Evaluation of surgical performance with standard rigid and flexible-tip laparoscopes.

BACKGROUND: Flexible-tip laparoscopes have recently been introduced into clinical practice, with the goal of improving surgeon performance during complex laparoscopic procedures. We used objective and subjective performance parameters to compare standard rigid 0 degrees and 30 degrees lens laparoscopes two flexible-tip laparoscopes in an in vitro model. METHODS: Twenty-nine subjects with varied levels of surgical experience performed complex laparoscopic tasks in three different models simulating (a) prostate dissection from the rectum, (b) cystic duct clipping, and (c) distal posterior rectum dissection. Each task was performed using two Storz rigid laparoscopes (0 degrees and 30 degrees) and two flexible-tip laparoscopes, the Olympus LTF-V3 and the Fujinon EL2-TF310. The sequence of application of the two flexible-tip laparoscopes was randomized. In each case, an experienced laparoscopic camera driver controlled the field of vision. Time to complete each task, operative precision, and subjective surgeon rating scores were compared. Statistical analysis was performed with analysis of variance (ANOVA) and a two-sided fisher's exact test. RESULTS: In all three models, the flexible laparoscopes offered no advantage in terms of procedure time, surgical precision, or subjective surgeon rating score when compared with the 30 degrees lens rigid laparoscope. The 30 degrees rigid lens laparoscope and the two flexible-tip laparoscopes were superior to the 0 degrees lens rigid laparoscope for all parameters evaluated, with the exception of subjective rating in the cystic duct model and procedure time in the colorectal model. CONCLUSION: In this in vitro experimental model, the flexible-tip laparoscopes found to have no advantage over the standard rigid 30 degrees lens laparoscope. These models were validated, as the 0 degrees lens rigid laparoscope was surpassed by the 30 degrees lens rigid laparoscope and the flexible-tip laparoscopes. Both flexible-tip laparoscopes produced similar results and excellent image quality, but some experience is required before their smooth application can be achieved.

Adult↗
PubMed2001

Laparoscopic vs. open resection for colorectal adenocarcinoma.

PURPOSE: To compare the outcome after laparoscopic versus open resection for colorectal adenocarcinoma. METHODS: A retrospective cohort analysis of all patients undergoing elective resection for colorectal adenocarcinoma between November 1992 and June 1999 at a university-affiliated hospital. These included 219 open (mean age, 68.3 years) and 98 laparoscopic (mean age, 70.3 years) resections. Data from converted cases (n = 12) were included in the laparoscopic group using the intention-to-treat principle. RESULTS: Operative time, lymph node yield, resection margins and postoperative morbidity and mortality were similar between laparoscopic and open technique. Parenteral analgesic use was less in the laparoscopic group (laparoscopic, 2.7; open, 3.2 days; P = 0.021). Time to first flatus (laparoscopic, 1.8; open, 3 days; P < 0.0001) and first bowel movement (laparoscopic, 3.5; open, 4.9 days; P < 0.0001) was shorter in the laparoscopic group. Resumption of an oral liquid diet (laparoscopic, 2.1; open, 4 days; P < 0.0001) and solid diet (laparoscopic, 5.2; open, 7.1 days; P < 0.0001) was also quicker in the laparoscopic patients. Length of hospitalization was significantly shorter in the laparoscopic patients (laparoscopic, 6.9; open, 10.9 days; P < 0.001). There were less minor complications in the laparoscopic group (laparoscopic, 11.2; open, 21.5 percent; P = 0.029) but no difference in major complications or perioperative mortality. Recurrence, disease-free and overall survival were similar between the two groups. No port site recurrences occurred in the laparoscopic group but there were three wound recurrences in the open group. CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic resection for colorectal cancer can be performed safely and effectively in tertiary centers. Earlier discharge from hospital, quicker resumption of oral feeds and less postoperative pain are clear advantages. No adverse effect on recurrence or survival was noted, but results of prospective, randomized trials, currently underway, are needed before laparoscopic resection for colorectal cancer becomes the standard of practice.

Adenocarcinoma↗
PubMed2003

Long-term results of laparoscopic versus open resections for rectal cancer for 124 unselected patients.

BACKGROUND: Controversy continues to surround laparoscopic rectal resection for malignancy. A longer follow-up period is required to evaluate the long-term efficacy of the procedure and its impact on survival. Furthermore, no data from ongoing randomized controlled trials are yet available. The aims of this study were to compare long-term outcomes for unselected patients undergoing either laparoscopic or open rectal resection for cancer. METHODS: A series of 124 unselected consecutive patients with rectal cancer, who underwent surgery by the same surgical team, have been included in this study. Patients with T1N0 tumors underwent local excision, and emergency cases were excluded from the study. Written consent was submitted by each patient, and inclusion in either group (laparoscopic or open) was left to the patient's choice. The laparoscopic approach was chosen by 81 patients, and 43 patients chose open surgery. All the patients underwent preoperative radiotherapy (5,040 cGy), performed in selected cases with chemotherapy (for patients younger than 70 years). The following parameters were compared between the two groups: length of the surgical specimen, clearance of the margins of the specimen, number of lymph nodes identified, local recurrence rate, incidence of distant metastases, and survival probability analysis. The mean follow-up period for both groups was 43.8 months (range, l-9 years). RESULTS: We performed 60 laparoscopic and 27 open anterior resections, as well as 21 laparoscopic and 16 open abdomino perineal resections, respectively. No mortality occurred in either group. The mean length of the resected specimens was 24.3 cm in the laparoscopic group and 23.8 cm in the open group ( p = 0.47). The mean tumor-free margin was 3.0 cm in the laparoscopic group and 2.8 cm in the open group ( p = 0.57), and the mean number of lymph nodes identified was 10.3 in the laparoscopic group and 9.8 in the open group ( p = 0.63). Of the 124 patients, 86 (52 laparoscopic and 34 open) were included in out study. We excluded patients who underwent a palliative resection (6 laparoscopic and 6 open patients) or conversion to open surgery ( n = 10) and patients who had undergone surgery in the past year ( n = 16). One laparoscopic patient was lost to follow-up evaluation, whereas three laparoscopic patients and one open patient died of causes not related to cancer. No wound recurrence was observed. The local recurrence rate after laparoscopic resection was 20.8%, as compared with 16.6% after open resection ( p = 0.687). Distant metastases occurred in 18.2% of the patients in the laparoscopic group, as compared with 21.2% in the open group ( p = 0.528). Cumulative survival probability was 0.709 after laparoscopic resection after LR and 0.606 after open resection ( p = 0.162), whereas for Dukes' stages A, B, and C in the laparoscopic group versus the open group, it was 0.875 vs 0.889 ( p = 0.392), 0.722 vs 0.584 ( p = 0.199), and 0.500 vs 0.417 ( p = 0.320), respectively. At this writing 20 laparoscopic patients (62.5%) and 20 open patients (60.6%) are disease free ( p = 0.623). CONCLUSIONS: Oncologic surgical principles were respected. Long-term outcome after laparoscopic resection of rectal cancer was comparable with that after conventional resection. We should wait to draw conclusive scientific statements until the completion of ongoing international randomized controlled trials.

Adult↗
PubMed1998

Abdominal wound tumor recurrence after open and laparoscopic-assisted splenectomy in a murine model.

PURPOSE: The cause of abdominal wall tumor recurrences after laparoscopic surgery for cancer remains unknown. A recent study from our laboratory using a murine splenic tumor model suggests that poor surgical technique (i.e., crushing of the tumor) and not the CO2 pneumoperitoneum is responsible for port wound tumors. However, in that experiment no actual laparoscopic procedure or manipulation was performed. The purpose of the current study was to determine the rate of abdominal wound tumors after laparoscopic-assisted splenectomy performed via a CO2 pneumoperitoneum vs. open splenectomy using the mouse splenic tumor model. METHODS: To establish splenic tumors, female BALB/c mice (N=72) were given subcapsular splenic injections of a 0.1-ml suspension containing 10(5) C-26 colon adenocarcinoma cells via a left flank incision at the initial procedure. Eight days later, animals were randomized into one of two groups: 1) laparoscopic-assisted splenectomy, or 2) open splenectomy. Laparoscopic-assisted splenectomy animals had three laparoscopic ports placed and then underwent laparoscopic mobilization of the spleen under a CO2 pneumoperitoneum followed by extracorporeal splenectomy via a subcostal incision. Group 2 animals underwent open splenectomy via a subcostal incision after three port incisions were made in the same locations as for laparoscopic-assisted splenectomy mice. The incision was closed after 20 minutes in both groups. Ten days later, the mice were killed and inspected for abdominal wall tumor implants. The experiment was performed via two separate trials. RESULTS: When results of the two trials were combined, there was no significant difference in the incidence of animals in each group with at least 1 port tumor (open, 21 percent; laparoscopic-assisted splenectomy, 33 percent; P=0.14). However, the overall incidence of port site tumors (number of ports with tumors/total number of ports for each group) was significantly higher in the laparoscopic-assisted splenectomy group than in the open group (20 vs. 7 percent; P=0.01). The subcostal incisional tumor recurrence rate was also higher in the laparoscopic-assisted splenectomy group (50 vs. 21 percent; P=0.02). as was the perioperative mortality rate (21 vs. 7 percent; P=0.08). Results of the two individual trials were also considered separately. The incidence of port wound tumors decreased significantly from the first to the second laparoscopic-assisted splenectomy trial (36 vs. 9 percent; P=0.003), although the incidence of tumors at the subcostal incision and the mortality rate for the two laparoscopic-assisted splenectomy group trials were not significantly different. The open group tumor incidences did not change from trial to trial. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, significantly more port and incisional tumors were noted in the laparoscopic-assisted group. Although not statistically significant, mortality rate of the laparoscopic-assisted group was higher than the open group. The reasons for these findings are unclear. Laparoscopic mobilization was quite difficult and required excessive splenic manipulation, which may have liberated tumor cells from the primary tumor and facilitated port tumor formation. With increased experience, less manipulation was required to complete mobilization. Of note, the incidence of port tumors in the laparoscopic-assisted splenectomy group decreased significantly from the first to the second trials; therefore, it is possible that surgical technique is a factor in port tumor formation. However, the persistently high tumor incidence at the subcostal incision site argues against the hypothesis that the second trial's laparoscopic mobilizations were less traumatic. The CO2 pneumoperitoneum may also be a factor. Further studies are warranted to clarify these issues.

Abdominal Neoplasms↗
PubMed2000

Laparoscopic port sites do not require fascial closure when nonbladed trocars are used.

The development of nonbladed obturators with integrated stability sleeves allows for creation of a muscle-splitting dilated laparoscopic port site with minimal abdominal wall defects after removal of trocar sleeves. Our objective was to determine the safety of using nonbladed obturators and not closing laparoscopic fascial port sites. Seventy patients underwent various laparoscopic procedures including the following: seven laparoscopic Roux en Y gastric bypasses, 21 laparoscopic cholecystectomies, 23 laparoscopic hernia repairs, 10 laparoscopic Nissen fundoplications, two laparoscopic appendectomies, two laparoscopic liver biopsies, one laparoscopic common bile duct exploration, one laparoscopic jejunal resection, one laparoscopic low anterior resection, one laparoscopic splenectomy, and one bedside diagnostic laparoscopy. A total of 180 laparoscopic port sites did not undergo fascial closure involving 110 10- to 12-mm ports. One hundred eighty nonbladed trocars were inserted without complication during laparoscopic surgery. In all cases the nonbladed obturator did not cause bleeding or injure viscera. Upon removal of large laparoscopic ports, the fascial defect was less than 6 to 8 mm, and the muscles of the abdominal wall covered the port site defect. The anterior fascial defect did not line up with the posterior fascial defect after removal of CO2 insufflation. No patients have developed ventral incisional hernias in the postoperative period (median follow-up of 11 months). We conclude that the use of nonbladed laparoscopic trocars is a safe technique with the ability to visualize dissection through the abdominal wall layers to create the smallest port dissection without bleeding or cutting muscle fibers. The ability to split the abdominal wall musculature allows the surgeon to forego closure of the small fascial defect.

Abdominal Muscles↗
PubMed2006

Laparoscopic colposuspension for urinary incontinence in women.

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic colposuspension was one of the first minimal access operations for the treatment of women with stress urinary incontinence, with the presumed advantages over traditional Burch colposuspension of avoiding major incisions, shorter hospital stay, and quicker return to normal activities. A variety of approaches and methods are used. OBJECTIVES: To determine the effects of laparoscopic colposuspension for urinary incontinence. SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched the Cochrane Incontinence Group Specialised Trials Register (searched 21 September 2005). Additional trials were sought from other sources such as reference lists, reviews and researchers and authors were contacted for unpublished data and trials. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised or quasi-randomised controlled trials in women with symptomatic or urodynamic diagnosis of stress or mixed incontinence that included laparoscopic surgery in at least one arm of the study. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Trials were evaluated for methodological quality and appropriateness for inclusion by the reviewers. Data were extracted by two of the reviewers and cross checked by another. Trial data were analysed by intervention. Where appropriate, a summary statistic was calculated. MAIN RESULTS: Twenty-one eligible trials were identified. Nine involved the comparison of laparoscopic with open colposuspension. Whilst the women's subjective impression of cure seemed similar for both procedures in the short and medium term follow-up, there was some evidence of poorer results of laparoscopic colposuspension, within 18 months, on objective outcomes. Two poor quality trials reported conflicting long term results (after five years) for this comparison. No significant differences were observed for post-operative urgency, voiding dysfunction or de novo detrusor overactivity. Trends were shown towards a lower perioperative complication rate, longer operating time, less intraoperative blood loss, less postoperative pain, shorter hospital stay, quicker return to normal activities, and shorter duration of catheterisation for laparoscopic compared with open colposuspension. Benefits did not come without a price, as laparoscopic colposuspension in the short term is more costly.Eight studies compared laparoscopic colposuspension with newer 'self-fixing' vaginal slings. Overall there were no significant differences in the reported subjective cure rates of the two procedures, however vaginal sling procedures did have significantly higher objective cure rates at 18 months. No significant differences were observed for post-operative voiding dysfunction, de novo detrusor activity and perioperative complications. Laparoscopic colposuspension has a significantly longer operation time, longer hospital stay and slower return to normal activities when compared to the sling procedures. Significantly higher subjective and objective (dry on 'ultrashort' pad test) one year cure rates were found for women randomised to two paravaginal sutures compared with one suture in a single trial (89% versus 65% and 83% versus 58% respectively). Two small studies compared sutures with mesh and staples for laparoscopic colposuspension and the comparisons, although showing a trend towards favouring the sutures, were not significant. One study compared transperitoneal with extraperitoneal access for laparoscopic colposuspension but it was also small and of poor quality. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: The long-term performance of laparoscopic colposuspension remains uncertain. Currently available evidence suggests that it may be as good as open colposuspension at two years post surgery. Like other laparoscopically performed operations, patients having laparoscopic colposuspension recovered quicker, but the operation itself took longer to perform. However, the newer vaginal sling procedures appear to offer even greater benefits of minimal access surgery and better objective outcomes in the short-term. If laparoscopic colposuspension is performed, two paravaginal sutures appear to be more effective than one. The place of laparoscopic colposuspension in clinical practice should become clearer when ongoing trials are reported and when there are more data available describing long-term cure results.

Female↗