Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Human Life Amendment”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

402 records · Page 23Linked to original sources
PubMed1995

Primary disease effects and associations in patients without early posttransplant events.

Many patients receiving primary cadaver renal transplants have complications in their early post-transplant courses which can affect and possibly confound long-term outcome analyses. Forty-four percent of primary cadaver recipients in the present study were excluded because of early events: delayed graft function (DGF) and early rejection episodes (ERE). Even with these exclusions, similar conclusions to the previous study (1) were noted: that is, the patients with systemic diseases (NS, HTN and IDDM) had the lowest 5-year graft survivals (57-62%) compared to those with diseases that were primarily renal (ALP, IGA and PC) which had better 5-year graft survival results (76-81%). Long-term half-life calculations also demonstrated improved graft survival prognoses in patients with primarily renal diseases (15-18 years in ALP, IGA and PC vs 6-8 years in IDDM, HTN and NS). Again, with the exclusions of patients with early events, Black recipients with HTN did not fare as well as non-Blacks (5-year graft survival of only 52% vs 69%). Many long-term graft losses were due to deaths, oftentimes from cardiovascular diseases. This was especially prominent in disease states with the greatest potential for arteriosclerosis (IDDM, HTN and NS). When patients with early events were excluded, the percent of graft losses attributable to patient death ranged from 21-58%, but were the highest with HTN, PC (age related) and IDDM: 41%, 45% and 58%. A similar analysis in IDDM patients receiving either a LD, SPK or KAT-type transplant revealed that although there was a 10% reduction in 5-year graft survival for KAT patients, most of these graft losses were owing to patient death. Outcomes in SPK and LD in IDDM patients were similar, suggesting selection bias and center effects with the latter two types of transplants going to healthier IDDM patients. It is too soon to conclude whether FK506 has a particularly beneficial role in one primary disease or another as compared to CsA. Combined kidney transplantation with a liver or heart transplant appears to be a reasonable risk. When graft losses due to patient deaths are accounted for, kidney graft survival was approximately that of kidney alone transplantation, suggesting again that graft loss due to patient death must be accounted for when analyzing transplant graft survival.

Graft Survival↗
PubMed2004

Sustained improvement over two years in physical function, structural damage, and signs and symptoms among patients with rheumatoid arthritis treated with infliximab and methotrexate.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of repeated administration of infliximab plus methotrexate (MTX) over a 2-year period in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) who previously experienced an incomplete response to MTX. METHODS: Four hundred twenty-eight patients were randomly assigned to receive MTX plus placebo or infliximab at a dose of 3 or 10 mg/kg plus MTX for 54 weeks, with an additional year of followup. The protocol was later amended to allow for continued treatment during the second year. Of 259 patients who entered the second year of treatment, 216 continued to receive infliximab plus MTX for 102 weeks. Ninety-four of these 259 patients experienced a gap in therapy of >8 weeks before continuing therapy. Infusions were administered at weeks 0, 2, and 6, followed by treatment every 4 weeks or every 8 weeks (alternating with placebo infusions in the interim 4-week visits) at a dose of 3 or 10 mg/kg for a total of 102 weeks (including the gap in therapy). For safety and efficacy assessments, data on the patients who were randomized to receive treatment, irrespective of whether treatment was administered for 102 weeks, were evaluated using all actual observations available. The efficacy measures included the Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ) (physical function), Short Form 36 health survey (SF-36) (health-related quality of life), total radiographic scores (structural damage), and the American College of Rheumatology 20% improvement criteria (ACR20) (signs and symptoms). RESULTS: The infliximab plus MTX regimens resulted in significantly greater improvement in HAQ scores (P < or = 0.006) and SF-36 physical component summary scores (P < or = 0.011) compared with the MTX-only group. There also was stability in the SF-36 mental component summary score among patients who received the infliximab plus MTX regimens. Median changes from baseline to week 102 in the total radiographic score were 4.25 for patients who received the MTX-only regimen and 0.50 for patients who received the infliximab plus MTX regimen. The proportion of patients achieving an ACR20 response at week 102 varied from 40% to 48% for the infliximab plus MTX groups compared with 16% for the MTX-only group. CONCLUSION: Throughout 102 weeks of therapy, infliximab plus MTX provided significant, clinically relevant improvement in physical function and quality of life, accompanied by inhibition of progressive joint damage and sustained improvement in the signs and symptoms of RA among patients who previously had an incomplete response to MTX alone.

Antibodies, Monoclonal↗
PubMed1995

Factors influencing progression of renal failure in autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease.

Autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease (ADPKD) frequently leads to end-stage renal failure (ESRF) in the sixth decade of life, but considerable heterogeneity exists in the rate of progression of renal failure. The respective contribution of genetic factors and of potentially amendable factors, such as blood pressure control or protein intake limitation, on the rate of progression in ADPKD patients is still debated. To evaluate the role of factors influencing the rate of progression of renal failure in ADPKD, we retrospectively analyzed the annual rate of decline of creatinine clearance (Ccr) in 109 ADPKD patients followed from the time a Ccr value of 30 to 50 mL per min/1.73 m2 was measured until ESRD and need for hemodialysis (Study A), and in 48 undialyzed ADPKD patients followed for at least 4 yr from the time a Ccr value of 50 to 60 mL per min/1.73 m2 was measured (Study B). In Study A, the decline in Ccr (delta Ccr) (mean +/- SE) was 5.8 +/- 0.2 mL per min/1.73 m2 per year in the whole series, and was lower in females than in males (5.0 +/- 0.2 versus 6.4 +/- 0.2, P < 0.001). Accordingly, ESRF was reached at a later age in female patients (55.1 +/- 1.2 versus 50.6 +/- 1.2 yr, P < 0.01). The age at ESRF in male patients was lower when the disease was transmitted by mother than by father (46.3 +/- 1.9 versus 54.1 +/- 1.8 yr, P < 0.01), whereas no significant effect of the gender of the affected parent was apparent in female patients. By regression analysis, there was a positive but weak relationship between delta Ccr and mean arterial pressure (average value during follow-up, 107 +/- 1 mm Hg, r = 0.224, P < 0.05) but not with dietary protein intake (mean value in follow-up, 0.87 +/- 0.03 g/kg per day, r = 0.10, P = 0.33) nor with proteinuria at baseline, which was lower than 0.3 g/day in 104 cases (r = 0.10, P = 0.28). There was a negative relationship between age at ESRF and delta Ccr (r = 0.245, P < 0.05), with a later and slower progression in older subjects. In Study B, the mean decline in renal function during follow-up was 5.3 +/- 0.4 mL/min/1.73 m2 per year, a value close to that observed in Study A. By multiple regression analysis of the overall population (studies A and B combined), only MAP, age and gender were independent predictive factors of delta Ccr but all studied parameters taken together accounted for at best 20% of delta Ccr variation. We conclude that the rate of progression of renal failure in ADPKD patients is mainly determined by gene expression, with female gender and older age associated with a slower progression, whereas blood pressure control, but not protein intake, exerts a limited beneficial influence on the rate of progression in patients with advanced polycystic kidney disease who already have significant renal insufficiency.

Adult↗
PubMed2005

Metformin extended release: metformin gastric retention, metformin GR, metformin XR.

Metformin extended release [Glumetza, metformin hydrochloride, metformin gastric retention, metformin GR] is a proprietary once-a-day formulation of metformin hydrochloride under development with Depomed for the treatment of diabetes mellitus. In May 2002, Depomed licensed manufacturing and marketing rights for its proprietary formulation of metformin extended release (500mg dose) to Biovail Corporation for the US (including Puerto Rico) and Canada. Under the terms of the agreement, Biovail will pay DepoMed a 25 million dollars milestone fee upon approval of the 500mg dosage and also customary royalties on the net sales in the US and Canada. Biovail also agreed to acquire approximately 2.4 million of additionally issued Depomed shares for 12.3 million dollars. Biovail has subsequently developed a 1000mg dose of metformin extended release [metformin XR] using its proprietary Smartcoat delivery technology allowing a graduated release of the active drug from the tablet. In April 2004, Depomed and Biovail amended their original license agreement of May 2002. Under the terms of the amended agreement, Depomed will receive royalties on sales of Biovail's 1000mg tablet in the US and Canada. In turn, Biovail acquired access to Depomed's clinical data for the metformin 500mg tablet that will be used to accelerate regulatory filings for Biovail's 1000mg tablet and establish equivalence between the two dosages. Biovail is seeking marketing partners for metformin extended release (Glumetza) in the US. The company anticipates signing an agreement for the US during the second half of 2005. In Canada, Biovail Corporation will market Glumetzatrade mark through its Canadian division, Bioval Pharmaceuticals Canada. Depomed has an agreement with LG Life Sciences for the commercialisation and distribution of metformin extended release in Korea. Metformin GR is available for partnership in Europe and Asia. Biovail Corporation and Depomed announced in June 2005 that the US FDA has approved metformin extended release (Glumetza) 500mg and 1000mg tablets for the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus. Biovail plans launching the product in the fourth quarter of 2005. In July 2005, Biovail paid Depomed a 25 million dollars milestone payment following approval of metformin extended release in the US for type 2 diabetes. In March 2005, Biovail Corporation and Depomed announced that they have received an approvable letter from the FDA for the once-daily, extended-release formulation of metformin extended release (Glumetza) 500mg and 1000mg tablets. The letter specified an issue related to finalising one manufacturing specification. There were no clinical labeling issues identified in the letter. Both companies filed a response to a specified issue at the FDA on 8 April 2005. The companies believed that the response will be classified as a Class I response with a 60-day review period. The 500mg dosage was developed by Depomed using its patented drug delivery GR technology, while Biovail developed metformin 1000mg dose using its proprietary Smartcoat delivery technology. Biovail's NDA for a once-daily, extended-release formulation of metformin HCl for the treatment of type II diabetes was filed in April 2004 and accepted for review in June 2004 by the FDA. Depomed completed two double-blind, pivotal, phase III clinical trials with metformin extended release 500mg at 60 sites in the US in more than 1000 patients with type 2 diabetes. In three different dosing regimens, metformin extended release significantly decreased the glycosylated haemoglobin level similarly to that of metformin immediate-release. Biovail successfully compared metformin extended release 1000mg dose with Depomed's 500mg dose in multiple equivalence studies. In these studies, metformin extended release was well tolerated and demonstrated an excellent safety profile in terms of gastrointestinal adverse events. On 1 June 2005, Depomed and Biovail Comporation, the licensee, announced that the Therapeutic Products Directorate in Canada issued a Notice of Compliance for metformin extended release (Glumetza) 500mg and 1000mg for the treatment of type 2 diabetes. Biovail Pharmaceuticals Canada plans to launch the product in the fourth quarter of 2005. Biovail has submitted an application for metformin extended release with the Therapeutic Products Directorate in Canada. and received notification of acceptance for review in August 2004. Bristol-Myers Squibb is marketing a proprietary, once-daily extended-release formulation of metformin (Glucophage XR). Several companies are developing controlled-release and extended-release formulations of metformin.

Clinical Trials as Topic↗
PubMed1999

Blood Pressure Monitoring. Task force III: Target-organ damage, morbidity and mortality.

OBJECTIVE: To reach a consensus on ambulatory blood pressure (ABP) as a predictor of target-organ damage (TOD), morbidity and mortality. METHOD: The members of task force III wrote this article in preparation for the Seventh International Consensus Conference (23-25 September 1999). This article was amended after the meeting to reflect the consensus reached at the conference. POINTS OF CONSENSUS: In most studies, TOD in essential hypertension was more closely associated with ABP than it was with clinic blood pressure, the mean weighted correlation coefficients for the relationship of left ventricular mass with blood pressure being 0.50/0.44 (24h systolic/diastolic blood pressure) and 0.35/0.32 (clinic systolic/diastolic blood pressure), respectively. The above correlation coefficients vary among studies, possibly because of different standardizations of clinic blood pressure measurements and ways of selecting subjects, among other reasons. The closeness of the association between clinic blood pressure and left ventricular mass increases with the numbers of clinic measurements of blood pressure and visits to a clinic. Thus, the variance of left ventricular mass explained by ABP in addition to that explained by clinic blood pressure diminishes with the number of clinic blood pressure readings. The proportion of variability of left ventricular mass that is directly accounted for by the day-night difference in blood pressure is 15% at the most. Thus, the advantage of ABP over clinic blood pressure appears to be, at least in part, a result of the greater number of measurements over the 24h. It might also depend, however, on the information offered by ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) on daily-life variations in blood pressure. TOD appears to be more closely associated with ABP than it is with clinic blood pressure for the subjects with reproducible ABP tracings, but not for those with poorly reproducible tracings. The probability of developing sustained clinic hypertension at follow-up seems to be better predicted by clinic blood pressure on several occasions over a 6-month period than it is by ABP at baseline, although, when also ABPM is repeatedly performed at follow-up, its ability to predict clinical outcomes of hypertensive patients remains superior to that of repeated clinic blood pressure measurements. ABPM of the elderly appears feasible and is tolerated well. A blunted day-night fall in blood pressure ('non-dipping') seems to be harmful, while evidence regarding the potentially harmful effect of extreme dipping is still limited. Authors of the Syst-Eur study recently demonstrated the prognostic value of ambulatory systolic blood pressure and in particular, of night-time blood pressure, in assessing old subjects with isolated systolic hypertension. The assessment of variability of blood pressure has been shown to provide a further prediction of cardiovascular risk and the potentially prognostic value of beat-to-beat variability assessed non-invasively (using a Finapres or Portapres device)needs further study. In the published event-based studies, the prognostic value of ABP recorded during a single session was superior to that of clinic blood pressure. Since the authors of published event-based prognostic studies compared ABP with only a few clinic measurements of blood pressure, it is not known how many visits or measurements of blood pressure (and at what cost) would equate to a single session of ABPM in terms of prediction of cardiovascular events. ABPM might allow one to identify a subset with 'normal' ABP (white-coat or isolated clinic hypertension). Daytime ABP levels <135 mmHg systolic and 85 mmHg diastolic can be defined as normal and values <130/80 mmHg could be defined as optimal. Cardiovascular risk for subjects with normal ABP seems to be lower than that for those with abnormally high ABP. Long-term observational and intervention studies concerning subjects with white-coat hypertension are needed. (ABST

Activities of Daily Living↗
PubMed1999

Task force IV: Clinical use of ambulatory blood pressure monitoring. Participants of the 1999 Consensus Conference on Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitoring.

OBJECTIVE: To reach a consensus on the clinical use of ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM). METHODS: A task force on the clinical use of ABPM wrote this overview in preparation for the Seventh International Consensus Conference (23-25 September 1999, Leuven, Belgium). This article was amended to account for opinions aired at the conference and to reflect the common ground reached in the discussions. POINTS OF CONSENSUS: The Riva Rocci/Korotkoff technique, although it is prone to error, is easy and cheap to perform and remains worldwide the standard procedure for measuring blood pressure. ABPM should be performed only with properly validated devices as an accessory to conventional measurement of blood pressure. Ambulatory recording of blood pressure requires considerable investment in equipment and training and its use for screening purposes cannot be recommended. ABPM is most useful for identifying patients with white-coat hypertension (WCH), also known as isolated clinic hypertension, which is arbitrarily defined as a clinic blood pressure of more than 140 mmHg systolic or 90 mmHg diastolic in a patient with daytime ambulatory blood pressure below 135 mmHg systolic and 85 mmHg diastolic. Some experts consider a daytime blood pressure below 130 mmHg systolic and 80 mmHg diastolic optimal. Whether WCH predisposes subjects to sustained hypertension remains debated. However, outcome is better correlated to the ambulatory blood pressure than it is to the conventional blood pressure. Antihypertensive drugs lower the clinic blood pressure in patients with WCH but not the ambulatory blood pressure, and also do not improve prognosis. Nevertheless, WCH should not be left unattended. If no previous cardiovascular complications are present, treatment could be limited to follow-up and hygienic measures, which should also account for risk factors other than hypertension. ABPM is superior to conventional measurement of blood pressure not only for selecting patients for antihypertensive drug treatment but also for assessing the effects both of non-pharmacological and of pharmacological therapy. The ambulatory blood pressure should be reduced by treatment to below the thresholds applied for diagnosing sustained hypertension. ABPM makes the diagnosis and treatment of nocturnal hypertension possible and is especially indicated for patients with borderline hypertension, the elderly, pregnant women, patients with treatment-resistant hypertension and patients with symptoms suggestive of hypotension. In centres with sufficient financial resources, ABPM could become part of the routine assessment of patients with clinic hypertension. For patients with WCH, it should be repeated at annual or 6-monthly intervals. Variation of blood pressure throughout the day can be monitored only by ABPM, but several advantages of the latter technique can also be obtained by self-measurement of blood pressure, a less expensive method that is probably better suited to primary practice and use in developing countries. CONCLUSIONS: ABPM or equivalent methods for tracing the white-coat effect should become part of the routine diagnostic and therapeutic procedures applied to treated and untreated patients with elevated clinic blood pressures. Results of long-term outcome trials should better establish the advantage of further integrating ABPM as an accessory to conventional sphygmomanometry into the routine care of hypertensive patients and should provide more definite information on the long-term cost-effectiveness. Because such trials are not likely to be funded by the pharmaceutical industry, governments and health insurance companies should take responsibility in this regard.

Antihypertensive Agents↗