Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “GPCR”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 415 records · Page 23Linked to original sources
PubMed2006

Structure of the rhodopsin dimer: a working model for G-protein-coupled receptors.

G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) participate in virtually all physiological processes. They constitute the largest and most structurally conserved family of signaling molecules. Several class C GPCRs have been shown to exist as dimers in their active form and growing evidence indicates that many, if not all, class A receptors also form dimers and/or higher-order oligomers. High-resolution crystal structures are available only for the detergent-solubilized light receptor rhodopsin (Rho), the archetypal class A GPCR. In addition, Rho is the only GPCR for which the presumed higher-order oligomeric state has been demonstrated, by imaging native disk membranes using atomic force microscopy (AFM). Based on these data and the X-ray structure, an atomic model of Rho dimers has been proposed, a model that is currently scrutinized in various ways. AFM has also been used to measure the forces required to unfold single Rho molecules, thereby revealing which residues are responsible for Rho's stability. Recent functional analyses of fractions from solubilized disk membranes revealed that higher-order Rho oligomers are the most active species. These and other results have enhanced our understanding of GPCR structure and function.

Animals↗
PubMed2005

Techniques: promiscuous Galpha proteins in basic research and drug discovery.

Assay technologies that measure the activation of heterotrimeric (alphabetagamma) G proteins by G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) are well established within the pharmaceutical industry, either for pharmacological characterization or for the identification of natural or surrogate receptor ligands. Despite recent evidence indicating that GPCR-linked signalling events might not be mediated exclusively by G proteins, G-protein activation remains a common benchmark for assessing GPCR family members. Thus, assay systems that translate ligand-mediated modulation of GPCRs into G-protein-dependent intracellular responses still represent key components of both basic research and the drug discovery process. In this article, the current knowledge and recent progress of integrating Galpha subunits into assay systems for GPCR drug discovery will be reviewed. Emphasis is given to novel promiscuous and chimeric Galpha proteins. Because of their ability to interact with a wide range of GPCRs, such novel G proteins are likely to be incorporated rapidly into drug discovery programmes.

Amino Acid Sequence↗
PubMed2005

Current methods used to investigate G protein coupled receptor oligomerisation.

Classical models of G protein coupled receptor (GPCR) signalling assume that each receptor functions as a single unit. However, evidence is increasing that GPCRs may form functional assemblies of dimeric or oligomeric units. There are several methods that can be used to give evidence of GPCR oligomerisation that will be discussed in this review. These include co-immunoprecipitation and Western blotting, resonance energy transfer methods and transactivation / complementation of partially functional receptors. One definitive method currently does not exist and there are various advantages and disadvantages to each method depending upon the system considered. Although co-immunoprecipitation and Western blot studies require disruption of the cellular environment and require specific antibodies, they are a good starting point to show that receptor oligomerisation occurs in native systems. Resonance energy transfer techniques provide evidence that receptors are in close proximity, are measured in living cells and some formats may be used for imaging applications. Transactivation / complementation requires extensive modification of the GPCR, but provides evidence that the receptors are in physical contact. Despite great advances being made using these techniques, future challenges involve the development of other methodologies to determine the role of receptor complexes in the pharmacology and physiology of native systems.

Animals↗
PubMed2006

Primate cytomegalovirus US12 gene family: a distinct and diverse clade of seven-transmembrane proteins.

Human cytomegalovirus (HCMV; Human herpesvirus 5) and the other betaherpesviruses encode a number of distinct gene families, including the US12 family, which is represented only in the cytomegaloviruses of higher primates, and is comprised of a set of 10 contiguous genes (US12 through US21), each encoding a seven-transmembrane (7TM) protein. Nonessential for replication in cell culture but well-conserved among clinical isolates, little is known of possible US12 family member functions, other than a previously identified amino acid sequence similarity between US21 and a group of 7TM proteins that include known inhibitors of apoptosis, and a very limited description of similarity between US12 family members and G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCR). As a prelude to biochemical analysis, we have conducted a detailed analysis of the relationships among US12 family members and between these proteins and other proteins, particularly GPCR and other 7TM molecules. In most cases, the closest relatives of individual genes are their colinear counterparts in the other viruses. Thus, the initial duplication and divergence events that resulted in the current version of the US12 family preceded divergence of the rhesus and hominoid lineages. Our phylogenetic analysis indicates that the US12 family represents a distinct branch of the 7TM superfamily. Although they are distantly related, at least some of the US12 family members may have GPCR-related properties, but they are also likely to embody functions and mechanisms that differ from more conventional GPCRs. Our analyses suggest that the 7TM structure of US12 family members constitutes a functionally flexible structural scaffold that can be readily adapted to diverse functional ends. This strategy may be the driving force in the emergence of the several families of duplicated and diverged betaherpesvirus genes.

Amino Acid Sequence↗
PubMed2006

Formation of new genes explains lower intron density in mammalian Rhodopsin G protein-coupled receptors.

Mammalian G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) genes are characterised by a large proportion of intronless genes or a lower density of introns when compared with GPCRs of invertebrates. It is unclear which mechanisms have influenced intron density in this protein family, which is one of the largest in the mammalian genomes. We used a combination of Hidden Markov Models (HMM) and BLAST searches to establish the comprehensive repertoire of Rhodopsin GPCRs from seven species and performed overall alignments and phylogenetic analysis using the maximum parsimony method for over 1400 receptors in 12 subgroups. We identified 14 different Ancestral Receptor Groups (ARGs) that have members in both vertebrate and invertebrate species. We found that there exists a remarkable difference in the intron density among ancestral and new Rhodopsin GPCRs. The intron density among ARGs members was more than 3.5-fold higher than that within non-ARG members and more than 2-fold higher when considering only the 7TM region. This suggests that the new GPCR genes have been predominantly formed intronless while the ancestral receptors likely accumulated introns during their evolution. Many of the intron positions found in mammalian ARG receptor sequences were found to be present in orthologue invertebrate receptors suggesting that these intron positions are ancient. This analysis also revealed that one intron position is much more frequent than any other position and it is common for a number of phylogenetically different Rhodopsin GPCR groups. This intron position lies within a functionally important, conserved, DRY motif which may form a proto-splice site that could contribute to positional intron insertion. Moreover, we have found that other receptor motifs, similar to DRY, also contain introns between the second and third nucleotide of the arginine codon which also forms a proto-splice site. Our analysis presents compelling evidence that there was not a major loss of introns in mammalian GPCRs and formation of new GPCRs among mammals explains why these have fewer introns compared to invertebrate GPCRs. We also discuss and speculate about the possible role of different RNA- and DNA-based mechanisms of intron insertion and loss.

Animals↗
PubMed2003

A functional assay for G-protein-coupled receptors using stably transformed insect tissue culture cell lines.

Insect cells are an underexplored resource for functional G-protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) assays, despite a strong record in biochemical (binding) assays. Here we describe the use of vectors capable of creating stably transformed insect cell lines to generate a cell-based functional GPCR assay. This assay employs the luminescent photoprotein aequorin and the promiscuous G-protein subunit Galpha16 and is broadly applicable to human GPCRs. We demonstrate that the assay can quantitate ligand concentration-activity relationships for seven different human GPCRs, can differentiate between partial and full agonists, and can determine rank order potencies for both agonists and antagonists that match those seen with other assay systems. Human Galpha16 improves signal strength but is not required for activity with some receptors. The coexpression of human and bovine betagamma subunits and/or phospholipase Cbeta makes no difference to agonist efficacy or potency. Two different receptors expressed in the same cell line respond to their specific agonists, and two different cell lines (Sf9 and High 5) are able to functionally detect the same expressed GPCR. Sf9 cells have the capability to produce fully functional human receptors, allied to a low background of endogenous receptors, and so are a valuable system for investigating orphan GPCRs and receptor dimerization.

Aequorin↗
PubMed2002

Structural studies on rhodopsin.

Bovine rhodopsin is the prototypical G protein coupled receptor (GPCR). It was the first GPCR to be obtained in quantity and studied in detail. It is also the first GPCR for which detailed three dimensional structural information has been obtained. Reviewed here are the experiments leading up to the high resolution structure determination of rhodopsin and the most recent structural information on the activation and stability of this integral membrane protein.

Amino Acid Sequence↗
PubMed2003

Galardin (GM 6001), a broad-spectrum matrix metalloproteinase inhibitor, blocks bombesin- and LPA-induced EGF receptor transactivation and DNA synthesis in rat-1 cells.

Matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs) have been implicated in the transactivation of the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) induced by G-protein coupled receptor (GPCR) agonists. Although EGFR phosphorylation and downstream signaling have been shown to be dependent on MMP activity in many systems, a role for MMPs in GPCR-induced DNA synthesis has not been studied in any detail. In this study we utilized the broad-spectrum matrix metalloproteinase inhibitor, galardin (Ilomastat, GM 6001), to study the mechanism of bombesin- or LPA-induced EGFR transactivation and the role of MMPs in early and late response mitogenic signaling in Rat-1 cells stably transfected with the bombesin/GRP receptor (BoR-15 cells). Addition of galardin to cells stimulated with bombesin or LPA specifically inhibited total EGFR phosphorylation, as well as site-specific phosphorylation of tyrosine 845, a putative Src phosphorylation site, and tyrosine 1068, a typical autophosphorylation site. Galardin treatment also inhibited extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK) activation induced by bombesin or LPA, but not by EGF. In addition, galardin inhibited bombesin- or LPA-induced DNA synthesis in a dose dependent manner, when stimulated by increasing concentrations of bombesin, and when added after bombesin stimulation. Furthermore, addition of galardin post-bombesin stimulation indicated that by 3 h sufficient accumulation of EGFR ligands had occurred to continue to induce transactivation despite an inhibition of MMP activity. Taken together, our results suggest that MMPs act as early as 5 min, and up to around 3 h, to mediate GPCR-induced EGFR transactivation, ERK activation, and stimulation of DNA synthesis.

Animals↗
PubMed2002

False positive non-synonymous polymorphisms of G-protein coupled receptor genes.

Polymorphisms of G-protein coupled receptor (GPCR) genes are associated with disease risk and modification, and the response to receptor-directed therapy. Genomic sequencing ( approximately 1700 automated runs) from as many as 120 chromosomes from 60 multiethnic individuals was performed to confirm non-synonymous coding polymorphisms reported in the dbSNP database from 25 randomly selected GPCR genes. These polymorphisms were in regions of the receptors responsible for structural integrity, ligand binding, G-protein coupling and phosphoregulation. However, most of these putative polymorphisms could not be confirmed (false positive rate of 68%). Based on these results, we suggest that the variability of the superfamily is not well defined, and we caution against exclusive reliance on databases for selection of candidate GPCR polymorphisms for disease association and pharmacogenetic studies.

Databases, Nucleic Acid↗
PubMed1998

Molecular mechanisms of G protein-coupled receptor desensitization and resensitization.

Beta-arrestin proteins play a dual role in regulating G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) responsiveness by contributing to both receptor desensitization and internalization. Recently, beta-arrestins were also shown to be critical determinants for beta2-adrenergic receptor (beta2AR) resensitization. This was demonstrated by overexpressing wild-type beta-arrestins to rescue the resensitization-defect of a beta2AR (Y326A) mutant (gain of function) and overexpressing a dominant-negative beta-arrestin inhibitor of beta2AR sequestration to impair beta2AR dephosphorylation and resensitization (loss of function). Moreover, the ability of the beta2AR to resensitize in different cell types was shown to be dependent upon beta-arrestin expression levels. To further study the mechanisms underlying beta-arrestin function, green fluorescent protein was coupled to beta-arrestin2 (beta arr2GFP), thus allowing the real-time visualization of the agonist-dependent trafficking of beta-arrestin in living cells. Beta arr2GFP translocation from the cytoplasm to the plasma membrane proceeded with a time course, sensitivity and specificity that was indistinguishable from the most sensitive second messenger readout systems. Beta arr2GFP translocation was GRK-dependent and was demonstrated for 16 different ligand-activated GPCRs. Because beta-arrestin binding is a common divergent step in GPCR signalling, this assay represents a universal methodology for screening orphan receptors, GRK inhibitors and novel GPCR ligands. Moreover, beta arr2GFP provides a valuable new tool to dissect the biological function and regulation of beta-arrestin proteins.

Animals↗
PubMed2000

Using green fluorescent proteins to study G-protein-coupled receptor localization and trafficking.

G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) mediate a diverse array of biological functions as a result of their ability to respond selectively to extracellular stimuli, which ultimately results in cell-specific activation of signaling cascades. Generally, GPCR activation is followed rapidly by a loss of responsiveness, termed desensitization, which is then followed by a period of recovery or resensitization. These changes in signaling potential are tightly regulated, primarily via mechanisms that involve GPCR phosphorylation and trafficking to distinct locations within the cell. Tagging of GPCRs with the green fluorescent protein (GFP) has enabled the direct visualization of real-time trafficking of GPCRs in living cells. Such analyses have provided crucial insight into the mechanisms involved in controlling GPCR function.

Animals↗
PubMed2002

A novel Schistosoma mansoni G protein-coupled receptor is responsive to histamine.

A new cDNA was cloned from the bloodfluke, Schistosoma mansoni and shown to encode a protein with structural characteristics of a biogenic amine G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR). At the amino acid level, the parasite receptor (SmGPCR) shared about the same level of sequence homology (approximately 30%) with all major types of amine GPCRs and could not be identified on the basis of sequence. SmGPCR exhibited several nonconservative substitutions at key GPCR positions, including an unusual asparagine substitution (Asn(111)) for the highly conserved aspartate of transmembrane (TM) 3. The full-length SmGPCR cDNA was double-tagged with N-terminal FLAG and C-terminal hexahistidine epitopes, and was codon-optimized for expression in cultured HEK293 and COS7 cells. In situ immunofluorescence analyses targeting the two N- and C-terminal epitopes demonstrated that the modified SmGPCR was expressed at high level in mammalian cells and assumed a typical GPCR topology, the N-terminus being extracellular and the C-terminus intracellular. Functional activity assays revealed that SmGPCR was responsive to histamine, which caused a dose-dependent elevation in intracellular Ca2+ (EC50=0.54+/-0.05 microM). An Asn(111)-->Asp mutation had no effect on the responsiveness to histamine, suggesting that SmGPCR does not require the TM3 aspartate for agonist activation, in contrast to most amine GPCRs. None of the other monoamines tested had any significant effect on receptor activity, using assays that measured both Ca2+- and cAMP-mediated signaling. The results suggest that SmGPCR is a novel structural class of histamine receptor that may be unique to flatworms.

Amino Acid Sequence↗
PubMed2002

Inhibition of somatostatin receptor 5-signaling by mammalian regulators of G-protein signaling (RGS) in yeast.

Regulators of G-protein signaling (RGSs) are negative regulators of G-protein coupled receptor (GPCR)-mediated signaling that function to limit the lifetime of receptor-activated G(alpha)-proteins. Here we show that four mammalian RGSs differentially inhibit the activation of a FUS1--LacZ reporter gene by the STE2 encoded GPCR in yeast. In order to examine the role of the GPCR in modulating RGS function, we functionally expressed the human somatostatin receptor 5 (SST(5)) in yeast. In the absence of RGSs, FUS1--LacZ activation in response to somatostatin increased in a dose-dependent manner in cells expressing SST(5). In contrast to the results obtained with Ste2p, all RGSs completely inhibited SST(5)-mediated signaling even at concentrations of agonist as high as 10(minus sign5) M. The ability of RGSs to inhibit SST(5) signaling was further assessed in cells expressing modified Gpa1 proteins. Even though SST(5)-mediated FUS1--LacZ activation was 5-fold more efficient with a Gpa1p/G(i3alpha) chimera, response to somatostatin was completely abolished by all four RGSs. Furthermore, we demonstrate that RGS1, RGS2 and RGS5 have reduced ability to inhibit SST(5)-mediated activation of the RGS-resistant Gpa1p(Gly302Ser) mutant suggesting that the ability to interact with the G(alpha)-protein is required for the inhibition of signaling. Taken together, our results indicate that RGSs serve as better GAPs for Gpa1p when activated by SST(5) than when this G-protein is activated by Ste2p.

Fungal Proteins↗
PubMed2003

Distribution analysis of nonsynonymous polymorphisms within the G-protein-coupled receptor gene family.

The G-protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) superfamily is one of the largest classes of proteins in mammalian genomes. GPCRs mediate diverse physiological functions and are the targets of >50% of all clinical drugs. The sequencing of the human genome and large-scale polymorphism discovery efforts have established an abundant source of single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs), particularly those that result in a change in the encoded amino acids (cSNPs), many are of which in GPCRs. Although the majority of these cSNPs are assumed not to be disease-causing (nDCs), experimental data on their functional impact are lacking. Here, we have computationally analyzed the distribution of 454 cSNPs within the GPCR gene family and have found that disease-causing cSNPs (DCs) are overrepresented, whereas nDCs are underrepresented or neutral in transmembrane and extracellular loop domains, respectively. This finding reflects the relative importance of these domains to GPCR function and implies different biological characteristics for the two sets of human polymorphisms.

GTP-Binding Proteins↗
PubMed2002

G protein-coupled receptor interacting proteins: emerging roles in localization and signal transduction.

The mechanism by which G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) translate extracellular signals into cellular changes initially was envisioned as a simple linear model: activation of the receptor by agonist binding leads to dissociation of the heterotrimeric GTP-binding G protein into its alpha and betagamma subunits, both of which can activate or inhibit various downstream effector molecules. The plethora of recently described multidomain scaffolding proteins and accessory/chaperone molecules that interact with GPCR, including GPCR themselves as homo- or heterodimers, provides for diverse molecular mechanisms for ligand recognition, signalling specificity, and receptor trafficking. This review will summarize the recently described GPCR-interacting proteins and their individual functional roles, as understood. Implicit in the search for the functional relevance of these interactions is the expectation that enhancement or disruption of target cell-specific events could serve as highly selective therapeutic opportunities.

Cell Membrane↗
PubMed2003

The N-terminal non-RGS domain of human regulator of G-protein signalling 1 contributes to its ability to inhibit pheromone receptor signalling in yeast.

Regulators of G-protein signalling (RGS) are a family of proteins that interact with G-proteins to regulate negatively G-protein coupled receptor (GPCR) signalling. In addition to a conserved core domain that is necessary and sufficient for their GTPase activating protein (GAP) like activity, RGSs possess N- and C-terminal motifs that confer distinct functional differences. In order to identify the role of the non-RGS region of human RGS1, we have characterized a series of fusions between RGS1 and GFP in a yeast mutant lacking the RGS containing SST2 gene. Using both halo assays as well as a GPCR responsive FUS1-LacZ reporter gene, we demonstrate that a RGS1-GFP fusion inhibits GPCR signalling in yeast while GFP fusions containing either the N-terminus non RGS sequence of RGS1(1-68) or the sequence containing the RGS box of RGS1(68-197) produce proteins that retain RGS1 activity. These results suggest that both the N-terminal and the RGS box of RGS1 function to inhibit signalling. Analysis of a series of mutants spanning the entire N-terminal non-RGS region of RGS1 produced by conservative segment exchange (CSE) mutagenesis showed little loss of function in yeast. This suggests that the overall structure of the N-terminal region of RGS1 rather than specific motifs or residues is required for its function.

Amino Acid Sequence↗
PubMed2004

Galpha protein dependent and independent effects of human RGS1 expression in yeast.

Regulators of G-protein Signalling (RGS) regulate the functional lifetime of G-Protein Coupled Receptor (GPCR)-activated heterotrimeric G-protein by serving as GTPase Accelerating Proteins (GAPs) for the G(alpha) subunit. A number of mammalian RGSs can functionally replace the yeast RGS containing SST2 gene and inhibit GPCR signalling. Using yeast strains harbouring a G(betagamma)-responsive FUS1-LacZ reporter gene, we demonstrate that heterologously expressed mammalian RGS1 also serves to decrease basal signalling in the absence of agonist. Although this effect was dependent on the expression of a GPA1-encoded functional G(alpha) protein, the GPCR itself was nevertheless not required. Using the GAL1 inducible promoter to express RGS1, we further demonstrate that in addition to serving as a GAP for Gpa1p in yeast, RGS1 is a dosage-dependent inhibitor of growth. This effect is specific to RGS1 since growth is not altered in cells expressing either mammalian RGS2 or RGS5. We further demonstrate that neither of the two yeast G(alpha) proteins is responsible for mediating this growth inhibitory effect of RGS1. Taken together, our results indicate that RGS1 can function in both G-protein-dependent and -independent manners in yeast.

GTP-Binding Protein alpha Subunits↗
PubMed1995

G protein-coupled receptor structure and function: the impact of disease-causing mutations.

Just as the discovery of 'inborn errors of metabolism' in humans contributed to our basic understanding of normal enzymatic pathways, so can genetic defects in signal transduction help to elucidate the functions normally subserved by different GPCR pathways. Identification and characterization of naturally occurring GPCR mutations not only has inherent value in understanding the molecular basis of disease, but can also accelerate progress in understanding the fundamental mechanisms involved in GPCR synthesis, transport to the membrane, ligand binding, activation and deactivation.

GTP-Binding Proteins↗