Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Elbow Prosthesis”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 415 records · Page 23Linked to original sources
PubMedDate not supplied

Interposition arthroplasty of the elbow with rheumatoid arthritis.

Radiographic bone loss and clinical outcome were evaluated at a median of 6 years after interposition arthroplasty was performed in 35 elbows with rheumatoid arthritis. Seven early postoperative complications, two major and five minor, occurred. Three elbows subsequently required total elbow replacement. Clinical results were good in terms of pain relief but only fair in terms of joint mobility and stability. Radiographic elbow destruction progressed to a higher Larsen stage in half of the elbows. Measurements revealed humeral bone loss in two thirds of the elbows and ulnar bone loss in one third. In comparison with total elbow replacement, the long-term results of interposition arthroplasty were found to be inferior, with a total elbow replacement being required in one tenth of the elbows in the long term. In addition, bone loss often became extensive, making reoperation difficult or impossible. The authors recommend total elbow replacement as the first choice in the surgical treatment of the painful elbow with rheumatoid arthritis and cartilage destruction.

Adult↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Comparison of survivorship between standard and long-stem souter-strathclyde total elbow arthroplasty.

This study compared 107 cases of rheumatoid arthritis that had the long-stem humeral component of the Souter-Strathclyde total elbow arthroplasty introduced as a primary procedure with a similar group of 202 cases that had the standard component. Both groups were comparable with regard to age range and sex ratio. Follow-up of the longer-stem component was somewhat shorter, being a mean of 4.4 years as opposed to 9.3 years. Kaplan-Meier survival analyses were undertaken for both revision and radiologic loosening of components as terminal events. There was no significant difference between the cumulative survival of the standard and long-stem humeral implants when revision was the endpoint. Although survival of both implants was similar, the reasons for this were different. More specifically, for the standard humeral component, 25 out of 32 revisions were for humeral loosening. For the long stem, however, 5 out of a total of 7 revisions were due to instability; no long-stem humeral component had been revised for loosening. In addition, linking the components by way of a snap-fit component was associated with a higher rate of loosening; more specifically, 5 out of 16 cases were revised. As a result of this study, we recommend the use of a long-stem Souter-Strathclyde humeral component as a primary implant. Other crucial components for long-stem survival, however, are surgical technique and alignment of the implant.

Adult↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Results of elbow endoprostheses in patients with rheumatoid arthritis in correlation with previous operations.

Fifty-nine patients with rheumatic destruction of the elbow received 20 St Georg, 20 GSB III, 13 Souter-Strathclyde, and 13 Kudo endoprostheses. Among the various prosthetic categories, 43.9% of the joints had had preceding rheumatoid surgery (a previous synovectomy had been performed in 10 joints at a mean of 4.1 +/- 3.7 years and a resection interposition arthroplasty had been performed in 19 cases 4.2 +/- 1.8 years before endoprosthetic replacement). We examined 51 patients with 54 prostheses after a mean follow-up of 5.7 +/- 4.1 years using the Inglis score and analyzing all radiographs. Complications occurred in 20% of the St Georg prostheses, 25% of the GSB III prostheses, and 23% of the Souter-Strathclyde prostheses. Of the St Georg prostheses, 6 (30%) had to be exchanged, as well as 4 (20%) of the GSB III prostheses and 4 (30.7%) of the Souter-Strathclyde prostheses. Of the primarily implanted joints, the St Georg prostheses measured 77.7 +/- 7.7 on the Inglis score, GSB III 89.6 +/- 7.2, Souter-Strathclyde 88.4 +/- 6.5, and Kudo 89.7 +/- 4.4. Radiolucent lines greater than 1 mm were observed in 26% of the St Georg prostheses, 23% of the GSB III prostheses, 27% of the Souter-Strathclyde prostheses, and 9% of the Kudo prostheses. In contrast to the clinical results, the intraoperative and postoperative complications, as well as the rate of failure and radiolucent lines, showed a statistically significant relationship to previous operations of the joints, especially with the resection interposition arthroplasty. We conclude that resection interposition arthroplasty seems to be associated with complications and failures when a subsequent endoprosthesis is used.

Aged↗
PubMed1979

Elbow joint forces in patients with rheumatoid arthritis.

Whilst developing an elbow endoprosthesis, the joint forces were estimated for patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Elbow flexion strength of rheumatoid patients was found to be 45% of normal. Muscle strengths and limb geometry data were found by a dissection technique, which allowed joint forces to be calculated during flexion, extension and abduction efforts. Forces up to 2.4 kN were predicted to act on the distal humerus, with similar forces acting in both radius and ulna. The skeletal structure is well adapted to carry the predicted forces, and onlay-type prostheses are recommended for elbow replacement.

Adult↗
PubMed1977

Current status of total joint replacement in the upper extremity.

The principles ot total joint arthroplasty recently have been expanded to the upper extremity, following the dramatic success with total hip and total knee replacement procedures. New problems have been encountered with the rebalancing of the soft tissues and the technical nature of joint mechanics in the upper extremities. Work on shoulder joint replacement is in the very early stages and of unknown success. Several prostheses are being used and tested. For elbow and wrist replacement, early and predictable success has been accomplished, enabling relief of pain and satisfactory motion. Total joint replacement in the fingers and thumb has provided excellent relief of pain but has been hindered by difficulties in rebalancing the soft tissues in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. It appears that total reconstruction of arthritic upper-extremity joints will be commonplace in the not-too-distant future. Clinical trials are being expanded, with increasing success.

Aged↗
PubMed1987

Endoprosthetic replacement of the proximal humerus.

Endoprosthetic replacement of the proximal humerus has been performed in our unit on 25 occasions between 1950 and 1982. The indication for surgery was destruction of the proximal half of the humerus so extensive that the only alternatives were reconstruction or amputation. Of the patients with tumours two died from metastases, and three from unrelated causes; local recurrence necessitated amputation in two patients. Minor complications were frequent, but there were no deep infections and, after 1964, no prosthesis became loose. Active shoulder movement after operation was considerably limited, but passive movement was good and function of the elbow and hand were preserved.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2005

Souter-Strathclyde total elbow arthroplasty in rheumatoid arthritis: medium-term results.

We present the outcome of 47 Souter-Strathclyde replacements of the elbow with a mean follow-up of 82 months (12 to 129). The clinical results were assessed using a condition-specific outcome measure. The mean total score (maximum 100) before the operation was 47.21 and improved to 79.92 (p < 0.001). The mean pain score (maximum 50) improved from 21.41 to 46.70 (p < 0.001) and the mean functional component of the score (maximum 30) from 11.19 to 18.65 (p < 0.001). There was negligible change in the score for the range of movement although a significant improvement in mean flexion from 124 degrees to 136 degrees was noted (p < 0.001). Revision surgery was required in four patients, for dislocation, wound dehiscence and early infection in one, late infection in two and aseptic loosening in one. The cumulative survival was 75% at nine years for all causes of failure and 97% at ten years for aseptic loosening alone. Our study demonstrates the value of the Souter-Strathclyde total elbow arthroplasty in providing relief from pain and functional improvement in rheumatoid patients.

Adult↗
PubMed2006

Exposure of the head of the radius using the Wrightington approach.

Surgical access to the head of the radius is usually performed through a lateral approach. We present an alternative technique through a modified posterior approach which was developed following dissections of 22 human cadavers. An osteotomy of the supinator tuberosity was performed and reflected as a single unit with the attached annular ligament. Excellent exposure of the head of the radius was achieved, replacement of the head was undertaken and the osteotomy site repaired. The elbows were stable and had a full range of movement. The approach was then carried out on 13 patients for elective replacement of the head and was found to be safe and reproducible. In the patient group all osteotomies united, the elbows were stable and had an improved range of supination and pronation. There was no change in flexion and extension of the elbow. Complications included a haematoma and a reflex sympathetic dystrophy. The modified posterior approach provides excellent access to the head and neck of the radius, gives good stability of the elbow and allows early mobilisation of the joint.

Adult↗
PubMed2005

Intrinsic constraint of unlinked total elbow replacements--the ulnotrochlear joint.

BACKGROUND: Many unlinked total elbow replacement designs with radically differing articular geometries exist, suggesting that there is no consensus regarding an optimal design. A feature inherent to the articular design is the intrinsic constraint afforded to the joint by the implant. Our aim was to compare the intrinsic constraints of unlinked implants with that of the normal ulnotrochlear joint. METHODS: We tested twelve cadaveric ulnotrochlear joints with a custom-made multiple-axis materials testing machine. With compressive loads ranging from 10 to 100 N, the joints were moved in either valgus or varus directions at 90 degrees of flexion. The ulnotrochlear components from a single example of five medium-sized unlinked elbow replacements (Ewald, Kudo, Pritchard ERS, Sorbie-Questor, and Souter-Strathclyde) were also tested. The recorded measurements included the torques and forces, angular displacement, and axial displacement of the humerus relative to the ulna. RESULTS: In general, the peak torque and the constraint ratio significantly increased with increasing compressive load for the implants as well as for the normal elbow. In valgus displacement, the Souter-Strathclyde implant had the highest and the Sorbie-Questor had the smallest peak torque and the Souter-Strathclyde had the highest and the Ewald had the smallest constraint ratio. In varus displacement, the Kudo had the highest and the Ewald had the smallest peak torque and constraint ratio. CONCLUSIONS: The constraint ratio is a characteristic that is useful for describing elbow joint behavior and for comparing the behavior of implants with that of the human elbow. Of the unlinked implants tested, the Souter-Strathclyde and Kudo prostheses most closely approximated the behavior of the human elbow joint. Implants that resemble the human elbow in appearance do not replicate normal behavior consistently, whereas other implants that do not resemble the human elbow closely do not deviate markedly from human behavior. Thus, much basic information about elbow form and function is needed to improve the performance of total elbow prostheses.

Aged↗
PubMed2005

Outcomes of total elbow arthroplasty for rheumatoid arthritis: comparative study of three implants.

BACKGROUND: As the English-language literature on prosthetic elbow arthroplasty contains only two comparative studies of implants in contemporary use, to our knowledge, comparisons of prosthetic performance is difficult. An improved knowledge of comparative outcomes would be valuable in guiding implant selection. METHODS: We identified three groups of consecutive patients who had undergone prosthetic elbow arthroplasty with the Souter-Strathclyde, Kudo, or Coonrad-Morrey implant for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis. There were thirty-three elbows in each group. All procedures were done by or under the supervision of one surgeon. Surviving patients in whom the elbow had not been revised were followed for a mean of sixty-one months after treatment with the Souter-Strathclyde implant, sixty-seven months after treatment with the Kudo implant, and sixty-eight months after treatment with the Coonrad-Morrey implant. Clinical function was assessed on the basis of pain relief and the range of flexion. Survivorship was assessed with use of a life-table method, with revision surgery and radiographic signs of loosening as the end points. RESULTS: The groups were comparable in terms of age, sex, and mean duration of follow-up. All three implant procedures relieved pain. Sustained improvement in the range of flexion was comparable among the three groups, with no implant procedure dramatically changing the fixed flexion deformity and all three improving maximum flexion. Revision surgery was needed because of infection, dislocation, and aseptic loosening. Survival of the Coonrad-Morrey implant was better than that of the other two implants. The five-year survival rates, with revision and radiographic signs of loosening as the end points, were 85% and 81% for the Souter-Strathclyde implant, 93% and 82% for the Kudo implant, and 90% and 86% for the Coonrad-Morrey implant. While radiographic evidence of loosening of the Coonrad-Morrey implants was less common, we noted focal osteolysis adjacent to 16% of these ulnar components and half of these cases progressed to frank loosening. CONCLUSIONS: The clinical function of these implants was similar in terms of pain relief and range of motion. We believe that component linkage with the Coonrad-Morrey implant prevents dislocation without increasing the risk of loosening.

Aged↗
PubMed1989

Failure of the Wadsworth elbow. Nineteen cases of rheumatoid arthritis followed for 5 years.

Nineteen Wadsworth elbow prostheses were inserted in 15 patients with rheumatoid arthritis during the 4 years 1979-1982. The patients were followed prospectively for an average of 5.7 years. Five elbows were revised because of mechanical loosening and one because of deep infection. Of the remaining 13 prostheses, there were radiographic signs of loosening in 8 cases.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1995

Wound healing after total elbow replacement in rheumatoid arthritis. Wound complications in 50 cases and laser-Doppler imaging of skin microcirculation.

Wound healing complications, predisposing to deep infection, are common following prosthetic surgery of the elbow. 50 capitellocondylar elbow prostheses were inserted, using a lateral approach, in 42 patients with rheumatoid arthritis. The first 5 elbows were immobilized postoperatively for 5 days and the following 45 elbows for 12 days, because of delayed wound healing in 2 of the first 5 elbows. No wound healing complications were recorded in elbows immobilized for 12 days and elbow motion was not compromised. 5 elbows were investigated with laser-Doppler imaging (LDI) technique, both pre- and postoperatively. Postoperative LDI values were considerably higher than preoperative ones, indicating no impairment of local skin microcirculation. The authors conclude that the lateral approach is safe to use in prosthetic surgery on the elbow. Early mobilization can delay wound healing, but this can be prevented by 2 weeks of postoperative immobilization.

Adult↗