Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Digoxin”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 415 records · Page 23Linked to original sources
PubMed1990

The evolving pattern of digoxin intoxication: observations at a large urban hospital from 1980 to 1988.

Digoxin intoxication has been reported to be a common adverse drug reaction with an in-hospital incidence of 6% to 23% and an associated mortality rate as high as 41%. A retrospective review was conducted to assess the accuracy of diagnosis, the morbidity and mortality of digoxin intoxication, and its incidence in hospitalized patients with heart failure. We reviewed the medical records of 219 patients discharged with the diagnosis of digoxin intoxication between 1980 and 1988. Patients were classified as follows: (1) Definite intoxication--patients with symptoms and/or arrhythmias suggestive of digoxin intoxication that resolved after discontinuation of digoxin; (2) possible intoxication--patients with symptoms and/or arrhythmias suggestive of digoxin intoxication in the absence of documented resolution after discontinuation of digoxin, or the presence of other clinical illnesses that could possibly account for those findings; (3) no intoxication--patients whose symptoms or ECG abnormalities were clearly explained by other associated clinical illnesses and persisted after withdrawal of digoxin. We identified only 43 patients (20%) with definite intoxication. The majority of patients discharged with the diagnosis of digoxin intoxication (133 or 60%) were classified as possibly digoxin intoxicated, and 43 patients (20%) had no clinical evidence to support this diagnosis. To estimate the incidence of digoxin intoxication, we also reviewed the medical records of 994 patients admitted in 1987 with heart failure. Of these, 563 were receiving digoxin and in 27 the diagnosis of digoxin intoxication was made by their clinicians. Our review showed that only four were definitely intoxicated (0.8%), and the diagnosis could not be excluded in another 16 (4%).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Aged↗
PubMed1995

Economic outcomes of withdrawal of digoxin therapy in adult patients with stable congestive heart failure.

OBJECTIVES: This study sought to analyze the health and economic outcomes of withdrawal of digoxin therapy among U.S. adult patients with stable congestive heart failure. BACKGROUND: New information regarding the outcomes of digoxin withdrawal has been provided by the Prospective Randomized Study of Ventricular Failure and Efficacy of Digoxin (PROVED) and Randomized Assessment of Digoxin and Inhibitors of Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme (RADIANCE) trials. We interpreted and extrapolated the results of these trials to describe implications on a national level. METHODS: We used a decision-analytic model to estimate the outcomes of two alternative strategies to 1) continue and 2) withdraw digoxin in patients with congestive heart failure with normal sinus rhythm, New York Heart Association functional class II or III and left ventricular ejection fraction < or = 35%. Epidemiologic assumptions were derived from published reports and expert opinion. Assumptions regarding the effectiveness of digoxin therapy were derived from the RADIANCE and PROVED digoxin withdrawal trials. Hospital and Medicare data were used for economic assumptions. Calculated outcomes included treatment failures, cases of digoxin toxicity and health care costs. RESULTS: The continuation of digoxin therapy in these patients with congestive heart failure nationally would avoid an estimated 185,000 clinic visits, 27,000 emergency visits and 137,000 hospital admissions for congestive heart failure. After accounting for an estimated 12,500 cases of digoxin toxicity, the net annual savings would be $406 million, with a 90% range of uncertainty of $106 to $822 million. One-way sensitivity analysis indicated that digoxin therapy is cost-saving when the assumed annual incidence of digoxin toxicity is < or = 33%. CONCLUSIONS: The continuation of digoxin therapy in patients with stable congestive heart failure should be strongly considered, because this strategy is likely to lead to both lower costs and greater health benefits on the basis of available information.

Adult↗
PubMed2004

Substantial pharmacokinetic interaction between digoxin and ritonavir in healthy volunteers.

BACKGROUND: Ritonavir is a potent in vitro inhibitor of several cytochrome P450 isozymes and ABC transporters including the efflux pump P-glycoprotein (P-gp). This study assessed the effect of repetitive ritonavir administration on digoxin distribution and total and renal digoxin clearance as a marker for P-gp activity in vivo. METHODS: In a randomized, placebo-controlled crossover study, 12 healthy male participants received oral ritonavir (300 mg twice daily) for 11 days. With the assumption that ritonavir steady state had been reached, 0.5 mg digoxin was given intravenously on day 3. Digoxin concentrations were determined in plasma and urine by radioimmunoassay, and plasma ritonavir concentrations were determined by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. Digoxin kinetics was estimated by compartmental and noncompartmental analyses, by use of the area under the plasma concentration-time curve, and the corresponding digoxin amount excreted into urine was used for digoxin clearance calculations. RESULTS: Ritonavir significantly (P <.01) increased digoxin area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time 0 to infinity by 86% and its volume of distribution by 77% and decreased nonrenal and renal digoxin clearance by 48% and 35%, respectively. Digoxin terminal half-life in plasma increased by 156% (P <.01). CONCLUSION: This inhibition of renal digoxin clearance is likely caused by ritonavir inhibition of P-gp. Its extent is considerable and similar to the effect of other potent P-gp inhibitors on digoxin disposition such as quinidine. These findings may, therefore, indicate that the pharmacokinetics of P-gp substrates sharing the renal tubular elimination pathway will be affected when combined with therapeutic doses of ritonavir in antiretroviral treatment regimens. In addition and contrarily to quinidine, these data indicate that ritonavir promotes digoxin distribution in the body.

ATP Binding Cassette Transporter, Subfamily B, Mem↗
PubMed1984

Digoxin-quinidine-spironolactone interaction.

Digoxin kinetics are substantially altered by quinidine and by spironolactone. We evaluated the effect of the combination of quinidine and spironolactone on digoxin kinetics and compared it to the effect on digoxin of each drug alone. Six normal subjects each received a 1.0-mg intravenous dose of digoxin alone, digoxin with quinidine, digoxin with spironolactone, and digoxin with both quinidine and spironolactone. Spironolactone and quinidine, alone and in combination, reduced digoxin systemic, renal, and nonrenal clearances and prolonged digoxin elimination t 1/2. A greater alteration in digoxin kinetics was induced by quinidine than by spironolactone, and an even greater effect resulted from the combination. We did not assess clinical consequences of the interaction. We advise reduction in digoxin dose, careful clinical evaluation, and measurement of serum digoxin concentrations when digoxin is used in combination with quinidine and spironolactone.

Adult↗
PubMed1999

The effect of steady-state ropinirole on plasma concentrations of digoxin in patients with Parkinson's disease.

AIMS: The aim of this single-blind study was to assess the effect of ropinirole, a novel treatment for Parkinson's disease, on the steady-state pharmacokinetics and safety of digoxin in 10 patients with Parkinson's disease. METHODS: There were three parts to the study: digoxin once daily plus placebo three times daily for 1 week; digoxin once daily plus ropinirole three times daily for 6 weeks; and digoxin once daily plus placebo three times daily for 1 week. Serial blood samples were collected over 24 h at the end of each part of the study for pharmacokinetic assessment. Pre-dose blood samples were collected on specific days throughout the study to assess the attainment of steady-state plasma levels of digoxin. The primary endpoints were AUC(0, tau) and Cmax for digoxin. RESULTS: There was a mean decrease of 10% in digoxin AUC (0, tau) (90% CI: 0.79, 1.01) and a 25% decrease in digoxin Cmax (90% CI: 0.58, 0.97) when ropinirole was co-administered, compared with digoxin alone Cmin plasma values for digoxin, however, were fairly constant throughout the study (point estimates 0.99, 95% CI: 0.85, 1.15). Changes in trough levels of digoxin are believed to be the most reliable way of assessing steady-state concentrations of digoxin, and therefore the clinical significance of an interaction. Changes in Cmax are too readily influenced by other factors. CONCLUSIONS: These results therefore indicate that on pharmacokinetic grounds no dose adjustment is necessary for digoxin co-administered with ropinirole.

Aged↗
PubMed2000

Plasma exchange for the removal of digoxin-specific antibody fragments in renal failure: timing is important for maximizing clearance.

Life-threatening digoxin toxicity may be effectively treated with digoxin-specific antibody fragments (Fab). However, in end-stage renal disease, the digoxin-Fab complexes persist in the circulation and dissociate, potentially resulting in rebounding free digoxin levels and the recurrence of symptomatic toxicity. To prevent this rebound phenomenon, plasma exchange (PE) has been implemented for the removal of the digoxin-Fab complexes in renal failure. However, there is only one case report describing its use in this setting. To better determine the optimal timing of PE after Fab administration, we performed two PE treatments (each preceded by Fab) in a patient with acute renal failure and acute digoxin poisoning. The admission serum digoxin level was 21 ng/mL. The timing of the PE treatments relative to Fab dosing was as follows: the first PE was performed 26 hours post-Fab, and the second PE was performed 2.5 hours post-Fab. The plasma ultrafiltrate digoxin concentration was 2.5-fold greater when PE was performed 2.5 hours versus 26 hours after Fab administration (19.9 versus 8.1 ng/mL). The combined total amount of digoxin removed in the ultrafiltrate plasma was minimal (0.13 mg), less than 1% of the total amount of ingested drug. We conclude that the optimal timing of PE is within the first 3 hours after Fab administration. Although PE is efficacious for removing digoxin-Fab complexes, thus preventing rebound digoxin toxicity, it is not efficacious for improving total digoxin clearance because of the large apparent volume of distribution of digoxin (5 to 8 L/kg).

Acute Kidney Injury↗
PubMed2000

Effect of zaleplon on digoxin pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics.

The pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of digoxin alone and digoxin plus zaleplon were studied. Healthy, nonsmoking men between 18 and 45 years of age were given a single oral dose of digoxin 0.375 mg daily on days 1 through 9. On days 10 through 14, the subjects received digoxin 0.375 mg plus oral zaleplon 10 mg daily. Blood samples were obtained on days 3, 5, 8, 9, and 14, and serum digoxin concentration data were analyzed by model-independent pharmacokinetic methods. Blood pressure, heart rate, PR interval, and QTc interval were recorded to determine the effect of zaleplon on digoxin pharmacodynamics. A total of 20 men completed the study. Maximum serum digoxin concentration and area under the serum digoxin concentration-versus-time curve from 0 to 24 hours met bioequivalence test criteria. There were no significant differences in QTc or PR interval between days 9 (digoxin alone) and 14 (digoxin plus zaleplon), and there were no clinically important changes from baseline to the study's end in vital signs, physical examination findings, or ECG results for individual subjects. Eighteen percent of the subjects who received digoxin alone and 35% of those who received digoxin plus zaleplon reported one or more adverse effects; all were mild and resolved quickly. Zaleplon had no significant effects on selected pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties of digoxin.

Acetamides↗
PubMed2002

Inappropriate use of digoxin in older hospitalized heart failure patients.

BACKGROUND: Older adults are more likely to suffer from the adverse effects of digoxin. Studies have described the inappropriate use of digoxin in various populations. The objective of this study was to determine the correlates of inappropriate digoxin use in older heart failure patients. METHODS: We studied older hospitalized heart failure patients with documented left ventricular (LV) function evaluation and electrocardiography. Digoxin use was considered inappropriate if patients had preserved LV systolic function (ejection fraction greater > or =40%) or if they had no atrial fibrillation (AF). We compared baseline patient characteristics by indication for digoxin and tested statistical significance using Pearson's chi-square analysis and Student's t tests. Using logistic regression, we determined the correlates of inappropriate use and initiation of digoxin. RESULTS: Subjects (N = 603) had a mean age of 79 (+/-7) years; 59% were women, and 18% were African American. A total of 376 patients (62%) were discharged on digoxin, and 223 (37%) had no indication for its use. Half of the patients without an indication for digoxin received the drug. Of 132 patients without an indication and not already on digoxin, 38 (29%) were initiated on it. After adjustment for various patient and care characteristics, prior digoxin use (adjusted odds ratio [OR] 11.47, 95% confidence interval [CI] 5.72-23.02) and pulse > or =100/min (adjusted OR 2.33, 95% CI 1.10-4.94) were associated with inappropriate digoxin use. Pulse > or =100/min was also associated with inappropriate initiation of the drug (adjusted OR 2.95, 95% CI 1.28-6.78). CONCLUSIONS: Inappropriate use of digoxin was common and was associated with prior use. Tachycardia was associated with inappropriate use and initiation. Electrocardiography and echocardiography should be performed in all older heart failure patients. Digoxin therapy should not be initiated or continued in patients without any evidence of LV systolic dysfunction or chronic AF.

Aged↗
PubMed2000

Predictive performance study of two digoxin assays in subjects with various degrees of renal function.

This prospective study was conducted to compare the predictive performance of fluorescence polarization immunoassay (FPIA, Abbott TDx Digoxin II) and radioimmunoassay (RIA, Kallestad Labs) with combined low-pressure liquid chromatography/RIA (LPLC/RIA) digoxin assay in measuring 15-17 serum digoxin concentrations (SDC) obtained after a single 10 microg/kg intravenous digoxin dose in patients with various degrees of renal function and at different SDC ranges. Eighteen men and women were stratified into 3 age- and gender-matched groups based upon renal function [N = 6 in each, group I (Cl(cr) < 10 mL/min), group II (Cl(cr) = 10-50 mL/min), and group III (Cl(cr) > 50 mL/min)]. Serum digoxin concentrations were measured at time zero; at 0.25, 0.5, 0.75, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, and 12 hours; and at 2, 3, 4, and 5-7 days after the digoxin dose, using the three different digoxin assays. TDx Digoxin II was unbiased [mean error -0.09 (95% CI -0.19, 0.01)] and RIA biased [mean error -0.29 (95% CI -0.36, -0.21)] to over-predict SDC by 14.2%. In group I patients, the analysis revealed a bias to over-predict SDC by 6.0% for TDx Digoxin II [mean error -0.16 (95% CI -0.29, -0.07)] and an unbiased performance by RIA. In groups II and III, both TDx Digoxin II and RIA showed biased performance, the mean magnitude of bias was low (< 20%). For intermediate SDC range (> 0.5 ng/mL and < or = 3.0 ng/mL), TDx Digoxin II was unbiased in predicting SDC, whereas RIA was biased to under-predict SDC [mean error 0.13 (95% CI 0.10, 0.16)] by 9.9%. The magnitude of bias observed in all cases was less than 20%. Both assays, TDx Digoxin II and RIA, imprecisely measured SDC for all samples combined, different groups and SDC ranges. In all time-paired samples, TDx Digoxin II (FPIA) performed better than the RIA. In conclusion, the magnitude of bias observed with either assay at different groups and SDC ranges was not likely to be clinically relevant. Therefore, either assay may be used to measure SDC in clinical practice.

Anti-Arrhythmia Agents↗
PubMed2003

A new turbidometric digoxin immunoassay on the ADVIA 1650 analyzer is free from interference by spironolactone, potassium canrenoate, and their common metabolite canrenone.

Spironolactone and potassium canrenoate (aldosterone antagonist diuretics) are often used with digoxin in clinical practice. It has been well documented in the literature that spironolactone, potassium canrenoate, and their common metabolite canrenone cross-react with the fluorescence polarization immunoassay (FPIA) for digoxin and falsely elevate measured serum digoxin concentrations. Recently a new turbidometric assay for digoxin became commercially available from Bayer Diagnostic for application on the ADVIA 1650 Chemistry analyzer. We studied the potential interference of these compounds in this new digoxin assay. Aliquots of drug-free serum were supplemented with therapeutic and above-therapeutic concentrations of spironolactone, canrenone, and potassium canrenoate, and apparent digoxin concentrations were measured. We observed apparent digoxin concentrations with the FPIA digoxin assay as expected but observed no apparent digoxin levels with the new turbidometric immunoassay. When serum pools prepared from patients receiving digoxin were supplemented with these compounds in concentrations expected in serum in patients receiving these medications, we observed falsely elevated digoxin levels with the FPIA digoxin assay, but no statistically significant change was observed with the new turbidometric assay. We conclude that the new turbidometric assay for digoxin is free from interference by spironolactone, potassium canrenoate, and their common metabolite canrenone.

Canrenoic Acid↗
PubMed1980

Effect of quinidine on plasma concentration and renal clearance of digoxin. A clinically important drug interaction.

1 Thirty patients on maintenance digoxin therapy and admitted for cardioversion of atrial fibrillation were closely monitored with regard to plasma levels of digoxin and quinidine. 2 Seventeen of these patients were kept on maintenance digoxin therapy. After an initial lag period of 6 to 18 h after the addition of quinidine their digoxin levels started to increase and had increased by between 20 and 330% after 3 days on quinidine. Side-effects attributed to the raised digoxin concentration occurred in 6 of these patients. 3 As studied in 5 of these 17 patients the renal clearance of digoxin decreased markedly when quinidine was added to the therapy. There was also a slight but significant reduction in creatinine clearance (n = 4). 4 In 13 patients digoxin was discontinued 36 h prior to the first quinidine dose. Also in these patients digoxin plasma levels increased significantly. 5 It is concluded that quinidine causes an unpredictably large increase in plasma digoxin and that this effect is probably at least initially to a large part due to a redistribution of digoxin in the body. The relative contributions of re-distribution and impaired renal clearance of digoxin to the increase in digoxin steady-state levels are presently unknown. 6 It is recommended that close monitoring of digoxin concentration and appropriate reduction of the maintenance dose is undertaken when quinidine is to be given to patients on digitalis therapy.

Creatinine↗
PubMed1995

Effect of tenidap sodium on digoxin pharmacokinetics in healthy young men.

1. The effects of tenidap sodium and placebo on digoxin pharmacokinetics were compared in 14 healthy young men, in a double-blind, parallel-group study lasting for 24 days. 2. Subjects were administered digoxin alone for the first 10 days and digoxin plus tenidap 120 mg day-1 or placebo for the remaining 14 days. 3. Changes in the means between day 10 (digoxin monotherapy) and day 24 (combined therapy) for renal clearance, area under the plasma concentration-time curve during the dosing interval, and the minimum and maximum plasma digoxin concentrations did not differ significantly between the tenidap and placebo groups. There was a small but statistically significant increase (0.5 h) in the time taken to reach maximum plasma digoxin concentration following 14 days' continuous tenidap co-administration compared with placebo, but this was not considered to be clinically meaningful. 4. Co-administration of tenidap and digoxin was well tolerated. No subject withdrew from the study during combination treatment. Treatment-related adverse events were of mild to moderate severity and were reported by four subjects on digoxin monotherapy, four on tenidap and digoxin, and by two on digoxin and placebo. Those reported by the tenidap group predominantly affected the gastrointestinal system and were mild in severity. There were no reports of laboratory test abnormalities or cardiovascular abnormalities related to combined digoxin and tenidap administration. 5. The results of this study indicate that, in healthy young men, co-administration of tenidap with digoxin does not have any apparent clinically significant effects on the pharmacokinetic profile of digoxin, and the treatment is well tolerated.

Adult↗
PubMed1993

Digoxin activates sarcoplasmic reticulum Ca(2+)-release channels: a possible role in cardiac inotropy.

1. The effect of digoxin on rapid 45Ca2+ efflux from cardiac and skeletal sarcoplasmic reticulum (SR) vesicles was investigated. Additionally the interaction of digoxin with single cardiac and skeletal muscle SR Ca(2+)-release channels incorporated into planar phospholipid bilayers and held under voltage clamp was determined. 2. Digoxin (1 nM) increased the initial rate and amount of Ca(2+)-induced release of 45Ca2+ from cardiac SR vesicles, passively loaded with 45CaCl2, at an extravesicular [Ca2+] of 0.1 microM. The efflux in the presence and absence of digoxin was inhibited at pM extravesicular Ca2+ and blocked by 5 mM Mg2+. 3. To elucidate the mechanism of action of digoxin, single-channel recording was used. Digoxin (1-20 nM) increased single-channel open probability (Po) when added to the cytosolic but not the luminal face of the cardiac channel in the presence of sub-maximally activating Ca2+ (0.1 microM-10 microM) with an EC50 of 0.91 nM at 10 microM Ca2+. The mechanisms underlying the action of digoxin appear to be concentration-dependent. The activation observed at 1 nM digoxin appears to be consistent with the sensitization of the channel to the effects of Ca2+. At higher concentrations the drug appears to interact synergistically with Ca2+ to produce values of Po considerably greater than those seen with Ca2+ as the sole activating ligand. 4. Digoxin had no effect on single-channel conductance or the Ca2+/Tris permeability ratio. In channels activated by digoxin the Po was decreased by Mg2+. Single-channels were characteristically modified to along lasting open, but reduced, conductance state when 100 nM ryanodine was added to the cytosolic side of the channel.5. Activation of the cardiac SR Ca2+-release channel was observed with similar concentrations of digitoxin, however, higher concentrations of ouabain were required to increase PO. In contrast, a steroid which is not positively inotropic, chlormadinone acetate, had no effect on either cardiac or skeletal SR Ca2+-release channel activity.6. At concentrations up to 1 microM, digoxin had no effect on Ca2+-induced 45Ca2+ efflux from skeletal muscle SR vesicles nor did it affect skeletal SR Ca2+-release channel Po, reflecting a difference between the cardiac and skeletal isoforms of the Ca2+-release channel.7. Since activation of the cardiac SR Ca2+-release channel occurs within the range of concentrations of digoxin encountered therapeutically, it is possible that activation of this channel contributes to the positive inotropic effect observed with this drug. Further, activation of the channel by higher concentrations of digoxin may contribute to the toxic effects seen clinically.

Animals↗
PubMed1996

Transport and epithelial secretion of the cardiac glycoside, digoxin, by human intestinal epithelial (Caco-2) cells.

1. Human intestinal epithelial Caco-2 cells have been used to investigate the transepithelial permeation of the cardiac glycoside, digoxin. 2. Transepithelial basal to apical [3H]-digoxin flux exceeds apical to basal flux, a net secretion of [3H]-digoxin being observed. At 200 microM digoxin, net secretory flux (Jnet) was 10.8 +/- 0.6 nmol cm-2 h-1. Maximal secretory flux (Jmax) of vinblastine was 1.3 +/- 0.1 nmol cm-2 h-1. Cellular uptake of digoxin was different across apical and basal cell boundaries. It was greatest across the basal surface at 1 microM, whereas at 200 microM, apical uptake exceeded basal uptake. 3. Net secretion of [3H]-digoxin was subject to inhibition by digitoxin and bufalin but was not inhibited by ouabain, convallatoxin, and strophanthidin (all 100 microM). Inhibition was due to both a decrease in Jb-a and an increase in Ja-b. Uptake of [3H]-digoxin at the apical surface was increased by digitoxin and bufalin. All cardiac glycosides decreased [3H]-digoxin uptake at the basal cell surface (except for 100 microM digitoxin). 4. The competitive P-glycoprotein inhibitors, verapamil (100 microM), nifedipine (50 microM) and vinblastine (50 microM) all abolished net secretion of [3H]-digoxin due to both a decrease in Jb-a and an increase in Ja-b. Cellular accumulation of [3H]-digoxin was also increased across both the apical and basal cell surfaces. I-Chloro-2,4,-dinitrobenzene (10 microM), a substrate for glutathione-S-transferase and subsequent ATP-dependent glutathione-S-conjugate secretion, failed to inhibit net secretion of [3H]-digoxin. The increase in absorptive permeability Pa-b (= Ja-b/Ca) and cellular [3H]-digoxin uptake upon P-glycoprotein inhibition, showed that the intestinal epithelium was rendered effectively impermeable by ATP-dependent extrusion at the apical surface. 5. A model for [3H]-digoxin secretion by the intestinal epithelium is likely to involve both diffusional uptake and Na(+)-K+ pump-mediated endocytosis, followed by active extrusion at the apical membrane.

ATP Binding Cassette Transporter, Subfamily B, Mem↗
PubMed2004

Effect of recombinant interleukin-2 pretreatment on oral and intravenous digoxin pharmacokinetics and P-glycoprotein activity in mice.

P-glycoprotein (P-gp) is an ATP-dependent efflux membrane transporter involved in many drug pharmacokinetics in humans. Decreasing its expression could enhance the bioavailability of substrates as digoxin. We have recently found that human recombinant interleukin-2 (rIL2) in vivo decreases P-gp expression in intestine and brain of mice and modifies oral digoxin pharmacokinetics. The aim of the study was to evaluate the involvement of bioavailability in the rIL2 pretreatment effect on digoxin pharmacokinetics by comparing oral and i.v. digoxin pharmacokinetics before and after rIL2 pretreatment (10 microg/kg). We also tried to show the possible effect of a low rIL2 dose (1 microg/kg) pretreatment on oral digoxin pharmacokinetics. First, adult Swiss mice received a single oral or i.v. dose of digoxin (0.03 mg/kg). Two weeks later, the same animals were treated by rIL2 i.p. twice a day (10 microg/kg) for 4 days and received digoxin again at day 5. As well, another group received oral digoxin (0.03 mg/kg) with a 1 microg/kg rIL2 pretreatment. Blood was collected after digoxin administration with and without rIL2 pretreatment. Digoxin pharmacokinetics were described by a one-compartment model. The 10 microg/kg rIL2 pretreatment did not modify i.v. digoxin pharmacokinetics, whereas oral digoxin pharmacokinetics were significantly modified by the 10 microg/kg rIL2 pretreatment and not by the 1 microg/kg rIL2 pretreatment. The decrease of P-gp activity, caused by rIL2 (10 microg/kg), increased digoxin bioavailability. An increase in exposure and intracellular level of drugs is expected from rIL2 pretreatment.

ATP Binding Cassette Transporter, Subfamily B, Mem↗
PubMed2001

Effect of rofecoxib on the pharmacokinetics of digoxin in healthy volunteers.

The authors examined the effect of the cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) inhibitor, rofecoxib, at steady state on the pharmacokinetics of digoxin following a single dose in healthy subjects. Each healthy subject (N = 10) received rofecoxib (75 mg once daily) or placebo for 11 days in a double-blind, randomized, balanced, two-period crossover study. A single 0.5 mg oral dose of digoxin elixir was administered on the 7th day of each 11-day period. Each treatment period was separated by 14 to 21 days. Samples for plasma and urine immunoreactive digoxin concentrations were collected through 120 hours following the digoxin dose. No statistically significant differences between treatment groups were observed for any of the calculated digoxin pharmacokinetic parameters. For digoxin AUC(0-infinity), AUC(0-24), and Cmax, the geometric mean ratios (90% confidence interval) for (rofecoxib + digoxin/placebo + digoxin) were 1.04 (0.94, 1.14), 1.02 (0.94, 1.09), and 1.00 (0.91, 1.10), respectively. The digoxin median tmax was 0.5 hours for both treatments. The harmonic mean elimination half-life was 45.7 and 43.4 hours for rofecoxib + digoxin and placebo + digoxin treatments, respectively. Digoxin is eliminated renally. The mean (SD) cumulative urinary excretion of immunoreactive digoxin after concurrent treatment with rofecoxib or placebo was 228.2 (+/- 30.8) and 235.1 (+/- 39.1) micrograms/120 hours, respectively. Transient and minor adverse events occurred with similar frequency on placebo and rofecoxib treatments, and no treatment-related pattern was apparent. Rofecoxib did not influence the plasma pharmacokinetics or renal elimination of a single oral dose of digoxin.

Administration, Oral↗
PubMed1986

The influence of diltiazem hydrochloride on trough serum digoxin concentrations.

A significant drug interaction between verapamil and digoxin, resulting in elevated serum digoxin concentrations, has been well documented in the medical literature. However, a similar interaction between digoxin and the calcium channel blockers nifedipine and diltiazem has not been conclusively established. This study investigated the influence of diltiazem hydrochloride on trough serum concentrations of concurrently administered digoxin in eight healthy volunteers. During the control phase of the study, volunteers were administered digoxin 0.25 mg/d for 13 days, and subsequently judged to be at steady state by serial determinations of digoxin serum concentrations. Twenty-four hour urine collections were done for creatinine clearance and urinary digoxin clearance determinations. Phase II of the study involved the addition of diltiazem hydrochloride 30 mg qid to the on-going, daily regimen of digoxin. After 14 days of concomitant therapy, steady-state trough digoxin concentrations were again determined, as well as creatinine clearances and urinary digoxin clearances. This investigation demonstrates that concomitant administration of diltiazem hydrochloride with digoxin results in significantly elevated steady-state trough digoxin concentrations (0.32 +/- 0.07 ng/ml increasing to 0.48 +/- 0.06 ng/ml, p less than 0.01). Urinary digoxin clearance decreased from 223.5 +/- 35.7 ml/min to 153.4 +/- 17.5 ml/min (p less than 0.05). Creatinine clearances were unaltered. A review of the current literature on this topic is included.

Adult↗
PubMed2004

Association between the number of coadministered P-glycoprotein inhibitors and serum digoxin levels in patients on therapeutic drug monitoring.

BACKGROUND: The ABC transporter P-glycoprotein (P-gp) is recognized as a site for drug-drug interactions and provides a mechanistic explanation for clinically relevant pharmacokinetic interactions with digoxin. The question of whether several P-gp inhibitors may have additive effects has not yet been addressed. METHODS: We evaluated the effects on serum concentrations of digoxin (S-digoxin) in 618 patients undergoing therapeutic drug monitoring. P-gp inhibitors were classified as Class I, with a known effect on digoxin kinetics, or Class II, showing inhibition in vitro but no documented effect on digoxin kinetics in humans. Mean S-digoxin values were compared between groups of patients with different numbers of coadministered P-gp inhibitors by a univariate and a multivariate model, including the potential covariates age, sex, digoxin dose and total number of prescribed drugs. RESULTS: A large proportion (47%) of the digoxin patients undergoing therapeutic drug monitoring had one or more P-gp inhibitor prescribed. In both univariate and multivariate analysis, S-digoxin increased in a stepwise fashion according to the number of coadministered P-gp inhibitors (all P values < 0.01 compared with no P-gp inhibitor). In multivariate analysis, S-digoxin levels were 1.26 +/- 0.04, 1.51 +/- 0.05, 1.59 +/- 0.08 and 2.00 +/- 0.25 nmol/L for zero, one, two and three P-gp inhibitors, respectively. The results were even more pronounced when we analyzed only Class I P-gp inhibitors (1.65 +/- 0.07 for one and 1.83 +/- 0.07 nmol/L for two). CONCLUSIONS: Polypharmacy may lead to multiple drug-drug interactions at the same site, in this case P-gp. The S-digoxin levels increased in a stepwise fashion with an increasing number of coadministered P-gp inhibitors in patients taking P-gp inhibitors and digoxin concomitantly. As coadministration of digoxin and P-gp inhibitors is common, it is important to increase awareness about P-gp interactions among prescribing clinicians.

ATP Binding Cassette Transporter, Subfamily B, Mem↗