Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Cannabinoids”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 415 records · Page 23Linked to original sources
PubMed1999

Pharmacology of cannabinoid receptor ligands.

Mammalian tissues contain at least two types of cannabinoid receptor, CB1 and CB2, both coupled to G proteins. CB1 receptors are expressed mainly by neurones of the central and peripheral nervous system whereas CB2 receptors occur in certain non-neuronal tissues, particularly in immune cells. The existence of endogenous ligands for cannabinoid receptors has also been demonstrated. The discovery of this endogenous cannabinoid system has been paralleled by a renewed interest in possible therapeutic applications of cannabinoids, for example in the management of pain and in the suppression of muscle spasticity/spasm associated with multiple sclerosis or spinal cord injury. It has also prompted the development of a range of novel cannabinoid receptor ligands, including several that show marked selectivity for CB1 or CB2 receptors. This review summarizes current knowledge about the in vitro pharmacological properties of important CB1 and CB2 receptor ligands. Particular attention is paid to the binding properties of these ligands, to the efficacies of cannabinoid receptor agonists, as determined using cyclic AMP or [35S]GTPgammaS binding assays, and to selected examples of how these pharmacological properties can be influenced by chemical structure. The in vitro pharmacological properties of ligands that can potently and selectively oppose the actions of CB1 or CB2 receptor agonists are also described. When administered by themselves, some of these ligands produce effects in certain tissue preparations that are opposite in direction to those produced by cannabinoid receptor agonists and the possibility that the ligands producing such inverse cannabimimetic effects are inverse agonists rather than pure antagonists is discussed.

Animals↗
PubMed1999

Structure and receptor activity for classical cannabinoids.

In this decade, classical cannabinoid SAR has increasingly been interpreted in terms of ligand-receptor interaction. Membrane receptor binding affinity, inhibition of receptor coupled processes, functional in vitro assays that distinguish between agonists and antagonists, transfected receptor systems, and distinction among receptor subtypes have been applied to cannabinoid pharmacology studies. These studies have revealed information about the pivotal receptor interaction that mediates the neurochemical system characterized by the receptor. The positive correlation between binding affinity and behavioral effects validates ligand-receptor interaction as a focus for developing new cannabinoids with the potential for selective pharmacological effects. Added to these direct receptor studies are the computational methods that compare active and inactive ligands for steric, electronic, and conformational similarities that reveal an SAR for activity with a sophistication and a perspective not possible before computer methodology. Merging these studies with knowledge of the receptor sequence, consequences of mutations of the receptor, and a calculated structure of the receptor are evolving a physical picture of the interaction of cannabinoids with its receptor(s). This picture of a ligand-receptor interaction guides medicinal chemists in their interpretation of classical cannabinoid SAR and the design of new analogs for selective pharmacological activity and as probes of the cannabinoid receptor. It is from a receptor perspective that this review of the SAR of classical cannabinoids is presented.

Animals↗
PubMed2000

CB1 cannabinoid receptor-mediated cell migration.

Recent studies have suggested that cell migratory responses are often mediated by G(i) protein-coupled receptors. Because it is known that CB1 cannabinoid receptors are coupled to pertussis toxin-sensitive G proteins, we proposed that CB1 may mediate cell migration. To test this hypothesis, modified Boyden chamber assays were used to investigate cell migration mediated by CB1 cannabinoid receptors. HU-210, WIN55212-2, and anandamide, three cannabinoid agonists with distinct chemical structures, induced migration of human embryonic kidney 293 cells stably transfected with human CB1 gene, but not 293 cells transfected with an empty expression vector. These migratory responses were concentration-dependent. The EC(50) values for HU-210, WIN55212-2, and anandamide were 0.19 +/- 0.04, 12. 2 +/- 1.4, and 39.9 +/- 3.7 nM, respectively. The maximal migration index for HU-210, WIN55212-2, and anandamide were 8.9 +/- 1.6, 9.5 +/- 1.6, and 8.8 +/- 1.3, respectively. Pretreating cells with 100 ng/ml pertussis toxin eliminated the cannabinoid agonist-induced cell migration. SR141716A, a selective antagonist for CB1, inhibited the cannabinoid agonist-induced migratory responses in a concentration-dependent manner. Checkerboard analysis demonstrated that anandamide-induced cell migrations are due to chemotaxis as well as chemokinesis. Furthermore, anandamide-induced migratory responses were inhibited, in a concentration-dependent manner, by PD098059, an inhibitor of mitogen-activated protein kinase activation, but not by 8-bromoadenosine-3',5'-cyclic monophosphate, a cell-permeable cAMP analog. These data demonstrate that cannabinoid agonists are able to induce chemotaxis and chemokinesis, and that these migratory responses are mediated by G protein-coupled, CB1 cannabinoid receptors. In addition, these data suggest that activation of mitogen-activated protein kinase plays an important role, whereas inhibition of adenylate cyclase is probably not involved in the cell migration mediated by CB1.

8-Bromo Cyclic Adenosine Monophosphate↗
PubMed2001

Zebra finch CB1 cannabinoid receptor: pharmacology and in vivo and in vitro effects of activation.

Zebra finches (Taeniopygia guttata) learn vocal behavior during sensitive developmental periods, similar to the way in which human language is acquired. As adults, they recite the learned song pattern in a stereotyped manner. Previously, we demonstrated that central nervous system-associated cannabinoid receptors (CB1) are expressed in brain regions known to control both juvenile song learning and adult recitation of song. Here we extend these findings by establishing the zebra finch as a behavioral model to study cannabinoid pharmacology, showing that the cannabinoid agonist WIN55212-2 inhibits both adult song production and locomotor activity, effects that are antagonist-reversed. Through radioligand binding assays we investigated the pharmacology of a number of cannabinoid ligands representing all structural classes and established an affinity profile that can be compared with that of other species. To begin to characterize signal transduction mechanisms we isolated cDNA encoding the receptor protein. The zebra finch CB1 receptor (ZFCB1) is highly expressed in brain with amino acid sequence 92% identical to human CB1 receptor. Establishment of a Chinese hamster ovary cell line stably expressing ZFCB1 allowed demonstration that the cannabinoid agonist WIN55212-2 dose dependently and potently inhibits forskolin-stimulated adenylate cyclase activity (IC(50) = 9.0 nM, maximum inhibition = 49% at 100 nM WIN55212-2, reversed by 1 mM SR141716A). Cyclase inhibition indicates that ZFCB1-mediated signal transduction is consistent with that of mammalian CB1 receptors. Overall, cannabinoid inhibition of adult song production and conserved pharmacology render the zebra finch a promising model to investigate cannabinoid effects on learning by juveniles.

Adenine↗
PubMed2001

Effects of cannabinoids on sympathetic and parasympathetic neuroeffector transmission in the rabbit heart.

Cannabinoids elicit marked cardiovascular responses. It is not clear how peripheral effects on the autonomic nervous system contribute to these responses. The aim of the present study was to characterize the peripheral actions of cannabinoids on the autonomic innervation of the heart. Experiments were carried out on pithed rabbits. In the first series of experiments, postganglionic sympathetic cardioaccelerator fibers were stimulated electrically. The synthetic cannabinoid receptor agonists WIN55212-2 (0.005, 0.05, 0.5, and 1.5 mg kg(-1) i.v.) and CP55940 (0.003, 0.03, 0.3, and 1 mg kg(-1) i.v.) dose dependently inhibited the electrically evoked cardioacceleration. The inhibition by WIN55212-2 (0.5 mg kg(-1) i.v.) was prevented by the CB(1) cannabinoid receptor antagonist SR141716A (0.5 mg kg(-1) i.v.). WIN55212-2 (0.5 mg kg(-1) i.v.) did not change the increase in heart rate evoked by injection of isoprenaline. In the second series of experiments, preganglionic vagal fibers were stimulated electrically. WIN55212-2 (0.005, 0.05, and 0.5 mg kg(-1) i.v.) and CP55940 (0.003, 0.03, and 0.3 mg kg(-1) i.v.) dose dependently inhibited the stimulation-evoked decrease in heart rate. The inhibition produced by WIN55212-2 (0.005, 0.05, and 0.5 mg kg(-1) i.v.) was antagonized by SR141716A (0.5 mg kg(-1) i.v.). The results indicate that cannabinoids, by activating CB(1) cannabinoid receptors, inhibit sympathetic and vagal neuroeffector transmission in the heart. The mechanism of the sympathoinhibition is probably presynaptic inhibition of noradrenaline release from postganglionic sympathetic neurons. The mechanism of the inhibition of vagal activity was not clarified: cannabinoids may have an inhibitory action on both pre- and postganglionic vagal neurons.

Adrenergic beta-Agonists↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Cannabinoids alter recognition memory in rats.

Cannabinoids are known to attenuate learning and memory in both humans and animals. In rodents, disruptive effect of cannabinoids on memory, reversed by SR 141716, a specific CB(1) receptor antagonist, was shown in behavioral tests based on conditioning. There are no data concerning the influence of cannabinoids on recognition memory. Recently, the improvement of recognition memory in cannabinoid CB(1) receptor knock-out mice was reported. Therefore, the purpose of the present study was to determine whether a stable analogue of endogenous cannabinoid anandamide, R-(+)-methanandamide (0.25 and 2.5 mg/kg, i.p.) and a potent CB(1) receptor agonist, CP 55,940 (0.025 and 0.25 mg/kg i.p.) affect recognition memory in rats evaluated in an object recognition test, based on discrimination between the familiar and a new object presented at 1h interval. Because cannabinoids at the higher doses can produce motor inhibition, the influence of both compounds on psychomotor activity was evaluated in an open field test. CP 55,940 and R-(+)-methanandamide, at both doses given once, 15 min before the learning trial, significantly attenuated recognition memory, measured by the difference in exploration of a new object and a duplicate of the familiar object. Moreover, CP 55,940 at the higher dose significantly attenuated ambulation, and bar approaches, and at both doses also rearings, evaluated in an open field, performed immediately after an object recognition test, while R-(+)-methanandamide at both doses did not alter locomotor and exploratory activity of rats. This is the first evidence that cannabinoids impair recognition memory in rats.

Animals↗
PubMed2005

[Influence of anandamide, the endogenous agonist of cannabinoid receptors on the circulatory system].

Cannabinoids, the active ingredients of Cannabis sativa, have been used by humans as hallucinogens and therapeutic agents for thousands of years. These agents are now known to act through the cannabinoid CB1 and CB2 receptors. The recent discovery of endogenous cannabinoids and the fact that they are involved in the pathology of hypotension associated with hemorrhage, sepsis, cirrhosis, and myocardial infarction indicate that cannabinoids play a greater role in human and animal pathophysiology than initially anticipated. Anandamide is the first of the endogenous cannabinoid ligands discovered. Its intravenous administration produces a characteristic three-phase response in the circulatory systems of experimental animals: In phase 1--a short-lasting decrease in heart rate and systemic blood pressure is related to activation of vanilloid TRPV1 receptors. In phase 2 an increase in blood pressure involves multiple mechanisms, both central (probably through the rostral ventrolateral medulla) and peripheral (vascular, Ca2+-dependent). In phase 3 there is a prolonged decrease in blood pressure and sometimes bradycardia, related to the activation of cannabinoid CB1 and vanilloid TRPV1 receptors. On the basis of this three-phase mechanism, the present paper intends to describe the participation of anandamide in the circulatory system under physiological and pathophysiological conditions. It also discusses the possibility of applying cannabinoid ligands as new therapeutic agents for the treatment of some pathologies.

Animals↗
PubMedDate not supplied

[Cannabinoid system and neuroinflammation:therapeutic perspectives in multiple sclerosis].

INTRODUCTION: The endocannabinoid system consists of cannabinoid receptors, endogenous ligands and the enzymatic elements involved in their synthesis and breakdown. AIM: To report on currently held knowledge about the functioning of the system as a modulator of the neuroinflammatory processes associated with chronic diseases such as multiple sclerosis. DEVELOPMENT: Cannabinoids are synthesised and released on demand and their production increases in times of neuroinflammation and neural damage. In this context then, their actions in the microglial cells and in the astrocytes are characterised by a lowered expression of inflammatory mediators and pro-inflammatory cytokines. Furthermore, cannabinoids can play a role as neuroprotectors by means of different types of mechanisms and, in experimental models of multiple sclerosis, they slow down the symptoms, reduce inflammation and can favour remyelination. CONCLUSIONS: The clinical use of cannabinoids or pharmacological agents that affect the endogenous cannabinoid system during inflammation of the central nervous system and in multiple sclerosis is currently under consideration and subject to debate. Detailed analysis of the results obtained over the past decade has made it possible to establish the existence of several mechanisms of action of cannabinoids in pathologies affecting the central nervous system that are accompanied by chronic inflammation. Likewise, they also clearly show that the cannabinoid system is an interesting proposal as a new therapeutic tool.

Animals↗
PubMed1985

Effects of prenatal exposure to cannabinoids.

Prenatal exposure to cannabinoids does not produce gross malformations in humans and only does so with any consistency in mice following exposure to relatively high doses and following the intraperitoneal route of administration. Resorption rates are reliably increased in mice but not rats following in utero cannabinoid exposure. There is also a reliable decrease in maternal food and water consumption and weight gain during pregnancy associated with maternal cannabinoid administration. This effect may account for many of the effects associated with prenatal exposure to cannabinoids, e.g., increased resorption rate. Prenatal exposure to cannabinoids produces a reliable decrease in birth weight in animals, but this is the only postnatal effect on offspring that has been reliably documented. Studies examining long-term postnatal effects are generally inconsistent. This inconsistency may be due to methodological flaws in experimental design, such as absence of controls for drug-related undernutrition and residual effects of maternal cannabinoid exposure during postnatal nursing. When such controls have been implemented, postnatal effects of prenatal cannabinoid exposure have not been reliably observed.

Abnormalities, Drug-Induced↗
PubMed1981

Interrelationships of glandular trichomes and cannabinoid content. I: Developing pistillate bracts of Cannabis sativa L. (Cannabaceae).

Gland number and cannabinoid content for three clones of Cannabis were compared. Cannabinoid levels and mature glands were quantified throughout progressive stages of pistillate bract development in order to define possible interrelationships between glands and cannabinoids. Similar trends occurred among the clones for each gland type while individual cannabinoids displayed a different pattern in each clone. Gland initiation and development as well as cannabinoid synthesis were found to occur during bract ontogeny for all three clones. A positive correlation existed for the total number of capitate glands per bract compared to the total cannabinoid content of the bract. The study also suggested that the glands may contain the majority of the cannabinoids present in the bract.

Cannabinoids↗
PubMed1993

Anandamide, an endogenous cannabinoid, inhibits calcium currents as a partial agonist in N18 neuroblastoma cells.

Anandamide (arachidonyl ethanolamide) has been identified as an endogenous ligand of cannabinoid receptors on the basis of its ability to displace 3H-labeled synthetic cannabinoid in a binding assay. One well characterized cellular action of cannabinoids is inhibition of hormonally stimulated adenylyl cyclase. Another action of synthetic cannabinoids is potent, stereospecific, and reversible inhibition of N-type calcium currents (ICa) in the NG108-15 neuroblastoma-glioma cell line via a pertussis toxin (PTX)-sensitive pathway, independently of cAMP metabolism. Here we used the N18 neuroblastoma cell line and the whole-cell voltage-clamp technique to show that anandamide also potently inhibits N-type ICa in a PTX-sensitive fashion. As with the cannabinomimetic aminoalkylindole WIN 55,212-2, inhibition by anandamide was voltage dependent and N-ethylmaleimide sensitive. However, anandamide was less efficacious than either WIN 55,212-2 or the nonclassical cannabinoid CP 55,940. Indeed, anandamide appears to act as a partial agonist at the cannabinoid receptor. Application of WIN 55,212-2 always caused further inhibition of ICa in cells exposed to a maximally effective concentration of anandamide, and application of anandamide always caused a partial recovery of ICa in cells exposed to a maximally effective concentration of WIN 55,212-2. This partial agonist property of anandamide suggests that, although anandamide inhibits N-type ICa via a PTX-sensitive G protein, its action as a neuromodulator in the intact animal may be more complex than would be inferred by extrapolating the results of in vivo studies with (-)-delta 9-tetra-hydrocannabinol or synthetic cannabinoids.

Adenylate Cyclase Toxin↗
PubMed1996

Rat brain cannabinoid receptor modulates N-type Ca2+ channels in a neuronal expression system.

Modulation of neuronal ion channels by the cloned rat brain CB1 cannabinoid receptor was investigated with the use of a heterologous neuronal expression system. Transient expression of the rat brain CB1 cannabinoid receptor was accomplished through microinjection of in vitro transcribed cRNA into the cytoplasm of enzymatically dissociated adult rat superior cervical ganglion neurons. The cannabimimetic aminoalkylindole WIN 55,212-2 inhibited whole-cell Ca2+ currents in neurons injected 16-25 hr previously with rat brain CB1 cannabinoid receptor cRNA. Inhibition of the Ca2+ current was voltage and concentration dependent, with a maximal inhibition of 73% and an IC50 value of 47 nM. The synthetic cannabinoid analogue CP55,940 also inhibited Ca2+ currents, with a maximal inhibition of 38% and an IC50 value of 7 nM. Ca2+ current inhibition was blocked by inclusion of guanosine-5'-O-(2-thiodiphosphate) in the intracellular patch pipette solution or by pretreatment with pertussis toxin. Pretreatment with the N-type Ca2+ channel antagonist omega-conotoxin GVIA reduced the inhibition by 100 nM WIN 55,212-2 from 44% to 6%, indicating that N-type Ca2+ channels are a target of cannabinoid action. On washout of WIN 55,212-2, the Ca2+ current amplitude "overrecovered" in 47% of the neurons tested. Anandamide, the endogenous cannabimimetic compound, had an inconsistent effect on the voltage-dependent Ca2+ currents in the majority of neurons microinjected with cannabinoid receptor cRNA. Ca2+ channels were a specific effector target of the cannabinoid receptor, as two different K+ currents, the M current and the A current, were not modulated by the cannabimimetic WIN 55,212-2.

Animals↗
PubMed1997

Cannabinoid receptors CB1 and CB2: a characterization of expression and adenylate cyclase modulation within the immune system.

Cannabinoid receptor (CB) expression was characterized in immunological cell and tissue preparations. Northern analysis revealed approximately 6-kb transcripts for CB1 (brain-type) in mouse spleen and brain and in rat cerebellum. CB1 was not detected in mouse thymus or rat spleen RNA by Northern analysis. CB2 (peripheral) was detected as a approximately 4-kb transcript in mouse spleen and thymus and as approximately 2.4-kb transcripts in rat spleen. Quantitation of CB2 transcripts in mouse spleen and thymus revealed approximately 4 x 10(3) and approximately 4 x 10(2) molecules/100 ng RNA, respectively, with no quantifiable CB2 in mouse brain. Conversely, CB1 was expressed in mouse brain (approximately 2 x 10(5) molecules/100 ng RNA) with lower expression in mouse spleen (approximately 2 x 10(2) molecules/100 ng RNA) and was not quantifiable in mouse thymus. Competition binding in intact mouse splenocytes demonstrated that nonradiolabeled cannabinoids CP-55940, Win-55212-2, CP-56667, delta 9-THC, and cannabinol all competed for receptor binding with 3H-CP-55940, a high-affinity nondiscriminating CB1 and CB2 receptor ligand. Based on previous findings which demonstrated a marked inhibition of T-cell-dependent immune responses by cannabinoids, primary T cells and several T-cell lines were characterized. Radioligand binding analysis identified 100-300 cannabinoid receptor binding sites/cell with an approximate Kd of 200-700 pM in purified splenic T cells which also exhibited cannabinoid-induced inhibition of adenylate cyclase. Northern analysis of human T-cell lines revealed approximately 2.4-kb CB2 mRNA transcripts but no CB1 in HPB-ALL cells, a cell line which also exhibited inhibition of adenylate cyclase by delta 9-THC. Conversely, Jurkat E6-1 cells expressed an unusual mRNA banding pattern for CB2 expressing three distinct transcript sizes, none of which were 2.4 kb, the size for human CB2. Jurkat also did not express CB1 mRNA and did not exhibit inhibition of adenylate cyclase when treated with delta 9-THC. Collectively, these results provide further evidence that CB2 is the predominant cannabinoid receptor within the immune system and that this form of the receptor is expressed on T cells.

Adenylyl Cyclases↗
PubMed2005

Cardiovascular pharmacology of cannabinoids.

Cannabinoids and their synthetic and endogenous analogs affect a broad range of physiological functions, including cardiovascular variables, the most important component of their effect being profound hypotension. The mechanisms of the cardiovascular effects of cannabinoids in vivo are complex and may involve modulation of autonomic outflow in both the central and peripheral nervous systems as well as direct effects on the myocardium and vasculature. Although several lines of evidence indicate that the cardiovascular depressive effects of cannabinoids are mediated by peripherally localized CB1 receptors, recent studies provide strong support for the existence of as-yet-undefined endothelial and cardiac receptor(s) that mediate certain endocannabinoid-induced cardiovascular effects. The endogenous cannabinoid system has been recently implicated in the mechanism of hypotension associated with hemorrhagic, endotoxic, and cardiogenic shock, and advanced liver cirrhosis. Furthermore, cannabinoids have been considered as novel antihypertensive agents. A protective role of endocannabinoids in myocardial ischemia has also been documented. In this chapter, we summarize current information on the cardiovascular effects of cannabinoids and highlight the importance of these effects in a variety of pathophysiological conditions.

Animals↗
PubMed2004

Behavioral and molecular changes elicited by acute administration of SR141716 to Delta9-tetrahydrocannabinol-tolerant rats: an experimental model of cannabinoid abstinence.

Whether chronic cannabinoid consumption produces a dependent state comparable to that occurring with other drugs (e.g. the appearance of withdrawal signs when consumption is interrupted), and whether chronic cannabinoid consumption increases the risk of consuming other drugs of greater addictive power, are probably the two questions relating to cannabinoid addiction that provoke the most controversy. The present study was designed to further explore these two questions in laboratory animals. Firstly, we examined the effects of an acute challenge with SR141716 (an antagonist for the cannabinoid CB(1) receptor) in Delta(9)-tetrahydrocannabinol (Delta(9)-THC)-tolerant rats. This antagonist has been reported to precipitate a cannabinoid withdrawal syndrome. Thus, the administration of SR141716 to Delta(9)-THC-tolerant rats reduced inactivity in the open-field test and enhanced responses as tremor, turning and retropulsion-these responses that were only slightly enhanced in control rats. The administration of SR141716 increased the plasma prolactin and the corticosterone concentration in controls, but these increases were much lesser in Delta(9)-THC-tolerant rats. In addition, CRF-mRNA levels in the paraventricular hypothalamic nucleus, while reduced in SR141716-treated controls, were significantly increased in Delta(9)-THC-tolerant rats. The analysis of endocannabinoids also revealed that the administration of SR141716, which was mostly inactive in control rats, was able to reverse the changes in anandamide or 2-arachidonoylglycerol concentrations found in Delta(9)-THC-tolerant rats, in the striatum, limbic forebrain, diencephalon, cerebellum and brainstem, but not in the midbrain and hippocampus. As a second objective, we evaluated whether Delta(9)-THC-tolerant rats were more vulnerable to morphine in a self-administration paradigm. The Delta(9)-THC-tolerant and control rats self-administered morphine to a similar extent, in concordance with the similar values of dopaminergic activity in limbic and motor regions. In summary, our data indicate that Delta(9)-THC-tolerant rats were not more vulnerable to the reinforcing properties of morphine. However, they responded to the blockade of CB(1) receptors by exhibiting slightly but possibly relevant differences in behavioral, endocrine and molecular parameters compared to the response in non-tolerant rats. This is indicative of the existence of a withdrawal syndrome in cannabinoid-tolerant rats that is mild compared with abstinence in opioid-dependent rats.

Animals↗
PubMed2006

The cannabinoid agonist WIN 55,212-2 inhibits TNF-alpha-induced neutrophil transmigration across ECV304 cells.

Cannabinoids are known to possess both anti-inflammatory and neuroprotective effects. In the present study, we have investigated the ability of cannabinoids to inhibit the transmigration of neutrophils in response to chemotaxic stimuli. The cannabinoid receptor agonist WIN 55,212-2 ((R)-(+)-[2,3-dihydro-5-methyl-3-(4-morpholinylmethyl)-pyrrolo[1,2,3-de]-1,4-benzoxazin-6-yl]-1-naphthalenylmethanone mesylate) significantly decreased the number of migrating neutrophils across a monolayer of tumour necrosis factor alpha (TNF-alpha) activated ECV304 cells at concentrations >or=1 microM. In contrast, the agonists HU210 and CP 55,940 (0.01-1 microM) and the endocannabinoid anandamide (0.1-10 microM) were without significant effect on the response to TNF-alpha. The ability of WIN 55,212-2 to reduce the neutrophil transmigration was still seen in the presence of the cannabinoid CB(1) receptor antagonist/inverse agonist AM251 (0.1-1 microM) and the cannabinoid CB(2) receptor antagonist/inverse agonist AM630 (0.1-1 microM). TNF-alpha treatment of ECV304 cells caused release of interleukin-8 (IL-8), but WIN 55,212-2 did not affect either the ability of neutrophils to migrate across chemotaxis plates in response to an IL-8 stimulus, or to change the percentage of CXC 1 and CXC 2 receptors expressed by the neutrophils. WIN 55,212-2 at a concentration of 1 microM, but not at lower concentrations, produced a significant inhibition of IL-8 release from ECV304 cells in response to TNF-alpha-stimulation. Thus WIN 55,212-2 reduces the transmigration of neutrophils across a monolayer of TNF-alpha-activated ECV304 cells by an indirect action upon the release of IL-8 and/or other chemokine release from the ECV304 cells, and that this effect is brought about mainly by a cannabinoid CB receptor-independent mechanism.

Analysis of Variance↗
PubMed2005

Endogenous cannabinoids are not involved in cocaine reinforcement and development of cocaine-induced behavioural sensitization.

The endogenous cannabinoid system is a relatively novel discovered system consisting of cannabinoid CB1 receptors, which are expressed both in the periphery and in the central nervous system, peripheral cannabinoid CB2 receptors and endogenous cannabinoids, which are anandamide and 2-arachidonyl glycerol. The cannabinoid CB1 receptors have recently been implicated in rewarding aspects of not only the cannabinoid drug Delta9-tetrahydrocannabinol (Delta9-THC), but also of other drugs of abuse, including cocaine. The present study was designed to further investigate the role of CB1 receptors in reward-related effects of cocaine. Using the CB1 receptor selective antagonist SR141716A, the involvement of CB1 receptors in cocaine reinforcement was determined by intravenous cocaine self-administration. In addition, the effects of the CB1 receptor selective antagonist SR141716A upon the development of cocaine-induced behavioural sensitization were investigated. SR141716A did not affect cocaine reinforcement nor did it affect the development of behavioural sensitization to the locomotor stimulant effects of cocaine. These findings suggest that CB1 receptors are not involved in acute cocaine reinforcement nor in cocaine-induced behavioural sensitization.

Analysis of Variance↗
PubMed2005

Cannabinoid signalling.

After their discovery, the two known cannabinoid receptors, CB(1) and CB(2), have been the focus of research into the cellular signalling mechanisms of cannabinoids. The initial assessment, mainly derived from expression studies, was that cannabinoids, via G(i/o) proteins, negatively modulate cyclic AMP levels, and activate inward rectifying K(+) channels. Recent findings have complicated this assessment on different levels: (1) cannabinoids include a wide range of compounds with varying profiles of affinity and efficacy at the known CB receptors, and these profiles do not necessarily match their biological activity; (2) CB receptors appear to be intrinsically active and possibly coupled to more than one type of G protein; (3) CB receptor signalling mechanisms are diverse and dependent on the system studied; (4) cannabinoids have other targets than CB receptors. The aim of this mini review is to discuss the current literature regarding CB receptor signalling pathways. These include regulation of adenylyl cyclase, MAP kinase, intracellular Ca(2+), and ion channels. In addition, actions of cannabinoids that are not mediated by CB(1) or CB(2) receptors are discussed.

Adenylyl Cyclases↗