Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Cannabinoid Receptor Modulators”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 415 records · Page 23Linked to original sources
PubMed2005

GABAB and CB1 cannabinoid receptor expression identifies two types of septal cholinergic neurons.

Septohippocampal cholinergic neurons play key roles in learning and memory processes, and in the generation of hippocampal theta rhythm. The range of receptors for endogenous modulators expressed on these neurons is unclear. Here we describe GABA(B) 1a/b receptor (GABA(B)R) and type 1 cannabinoid receptor (CB(1)R) expression in rat septal cholinergic [i.e. choline acetyltransferase (ChAT)-positive] cells. Using double immunofluorescent staining, we found that almost two-thirds of the cholinergic cells in the rat medial septum were GABA(B)R positive, and that these cells had significantly larger somata than did GABA(B)R-negative cholinergic neurons. We detected CB(1)R labelling in somata after axonal protein transport was blocked by colchicine. In these animals about one-third of the cholinergic cells were CB(1)R positive. These cells again had larger somata than CB(1)R-negative cholinergic neurons. The analyses confirmed that the size of GABA(B)R-positive and CB(1)R-positive cholinergic cells were alike, and all CB(1)R-positive cholinergic cells were GABA(B)R positive as well. CB(1)R-positive cells were invariably ChAT positive. All retrogradely labelled septohippocampal cholinergic cells were positive for GABA(B)R and at least half of them also for CB(1)R. These data shed light on the existence of at least two cholinergic cell types in the medial septum: one expresses GABA(B)R and CB(1)R, has large somata and projects to the hippocampus, whereas the other is negative for GABA(B)R and CB(1)R and has smaller somata. The results also suggest that cholinergic transmission in the hippocampus is fine-tuned by endocannabinoid signalling.

Acetylcholine↗
PubMed2006

The cannabinergic system as a target for anti-inflammatory therapies.

Habitual cannabis use has been shown to affect the human immune system, and recent advances in endocannabinoid research provide a basis for understanding these immunomodulatory effects. Cell-based experiments or in vivo animal testing suggest that regulation of the endocannabinoid circuitry can impact almost every major function associated with the immune system. These studies were assisted by the development of numerous novel molecules that exert their biological effects through the endocannabinoid system. Several of these compounds were tested for their effects on immune function, and the results suggest therapeutic opportunities for a variety of inflammatory diseases such as multiple sclerosis, rheumatoid arthritis, inflammatory bowel disease, atherosclerosis, allergic asthma, and autoimmune diabetes through modulation of the endocannabinoid system.

Animals↗
PubMed2006

Cannabinoid receptors as therapeutic targets for obesity and metabolic diseases.

One of the most interesting pharmacological targets proposed in the past ten years for fighting obesity and related metabolic disorders is the endocannabinoid system. The role of the endocannabinoid system is crucial in regulating the rewarding properties of food, in controlling energy balance by acting at the hypothalamic circuitries involved in food intake, and in peripheral metabolism by influencing adipocytes, hepatocytes, myocytes and pancreatic endocrine cells. Obesity seems to be a condition associated with a pathological overactivation of the endocannabinoid system; therefore, restoring a normal endocannabinoid tone by antagonizing the cannabinoid receptor type 1 (CB(1)) could help arrest both the development and the maintenance of obesity.

Animals↗
PubMed2005

Lipid rafts: a nexus for endocannabinoid signaling?

The endocannabinoids are endogenous agonists of the cannabinoid receptors and some members of the transient receptor potential, vanilloid type (TRPV), family of cation channels. Endocannabinoids along with their target receptors comprise a signaling system that is not well characterized. There have been many advances in our collective understanding of endocannabinoid signaling in the last decade and experimental evidence is mounting that pharmacological augmentation of endocannabinoid tone might have a significant therapeutic benefit in several disease states. However, the mechanisms responsible for the biosynthesis, cellular uptake, and intracellular processing of endocannabinoids are not well understood and have been the source of much debate. Recent studies have revealed a role for detergent insoluble membrane domains called lipid rafts in various aspects of signaling associated with the endocannabinoid anandamide. Intact detergent insoluble membrane domains appear to play a role in an anandamide-induced signaling cascade that is independent of G protein-coupled cannabinoid receptors or TRPV channels. Furthermore, detergent insoluble membrane domain-related endocytosis and recycling to lipid rafts appear to regulate the organization and localization of anandamide metabolites. We will discuss the implications that these findings have on the way we view endocannabinoid signaling, trafficking, and processing.

Apoptosis↗
PubMed2005

Functional neuroanatomy of the endocannabinoid system.

Several components of the endocannabinoid system have been fully characterized. Among them are two types of cannabinoid receptors (termed CB1 and CB2), endogenous ligands for those receptors (referred to as "endocannabinoids"), and specific enzymes responsible for their degradation and inactivation. The study of the distribution and abundance of these elements in the central nervous system has provided the basis for the well-known effects of exogenous (both natural and synthetic) and endogenous cannabinoids. In addition, recent developments also support the idea that the endocannabinoid system plays a critical neuromodulatory role in the central nervous system. For instance, cannabinoid CB1 receptor activation is known to modify the release of several neurotransmitters, such as glutamate and gamma-aminobutyric acid. However, we still lack knowledge on fundamental aspects of the physiological roles of this system. Interestingly, changes in the distribution and activity of some of these components of the endocannabinoid system have been reported under different pathological conditions, suggesting their possible involvement in the pathogenesis of these diseases. As comprehensive excellent reviews have been recently published, the present review will focus only on the most recent advances in the field, considering a new perspective of the endocannabinoid system as composed of both neuronal and glial divisions.

Amidohydrolases↗
PubMed2003

Oleamide: a member of the endocannabinoid family?

The fatty acid amide class of compounds, which include the endocannabinoid anandamide and the sleep-inducing compound oleamide, have been shown in vitro to have a multiplicity of actions upon different neurochemical systems. In the present issue of this journal, Leggett et al present data indicating that oleamide functionally activates CB(1) cannabinoid receptors in vitro. The significance of their finding is discussed in this commentary.

Animals↗
PubMed2005

Is there a role for the endocannabinoid system in the etiology and treatment of melancholic depression?

With advances in basic and clinical neuroscience, many gaps have appeared in the traditional monoamine theory of depression that have led to reformulation of the hypotheses concerning the neurobiology of depression. The more recent hypotheses suggest that melancholic depression is characterized by central glucocorticoid resistance that results in hypercortisolemia, which in turn leads to down-regulation of neurotrophins and subsequent neurodegeneration. Examining the neurobiology of depression from this perspective suggests that the endocannabinoid system may play a role in the etiology of melancholic depression. Specifically, pharmacological and genetic blockade of the cannabinoid CB1 receptor induces a phenotypic state that is analogous to melancholic depression, including symptoms such as reduced food intake, heightened anxiety, increased arousal and wakefulness, deficits in extinction of aversive memories and supersensitivity to stress. These similarities between melancholic depression and an endocannabinoid deficiency become more interesting in light of recent findings that endocannabinoid activity is down-regulated by chronic stress and possibly increased by some antidepressant regimens. We propose that an endocannabinoid deficiency may underlie some of the symptoms of melancholic depression, and that enhancement of this system may ultimately be a novel form of pharmacotherapy for treatment-resistant depression.

Animals↗
PubMed2006

The endocannabinoid system: current pharmacological research and therapeutic possibilities.

In the relatively short period of time since the discovery of cannabinoid receptors and their endogenous ligands, the endocannabinoids, an intensive research effort has resulted in the identification of agents that affect all aspects of the endocannabinoid system. The cannabinoid(1) receptor antagonist rimonabant is in phase III clinical trials for the treatment of obesity and as an aid to smoking cessation, and cannabinoid(2) receptor agonists are promising in animal models of inflammatory and neuropathic pain. In the present MiniReview, the endocannabinoid system is described from a pharmacological perspective. The main topics covered are: the mechanism of action of cannabinoid(2) receptor agonists; identification of the endocannabinoid(s) involved in retrograde signalling; the elusive mechanism(s) of endocannabinoid uptake; therapeutic possibilities for fatty acid amide hydrolase inhibitors; and the cyclooxygenase-2 and lipoxygenase-derived biologically active metabolites of the endocannabinoids.

Amidohydrolases↗
PubMed2006

Endocannabinoids as novel mediators of liver diseases.

In the past two decades, cannabinoids have emerged as crucial mediators in a variety of pathophysiological conditions. Awareness of their critical functions in liver pathophysiology is only recent, probably given the low level of expression of cannabinoid receptor type 1 (CB1 receptor) and type 2 (CB2 receptor) in normal liver. However, it has been shown that non-alcoholic fatty liver disease and cirrhosis are associated to a marked upregulation of the hepatic endocannabinoid system, including increases in endocannabinoids and in hepatic CB receptors, both in humans and in rodents. Consequently, a growing number of cannabinoid-related hepatic effects are being unravelled. Hence, hepatic CB1 receptors enhance liver steatogenesis in a mouse model of high fat-induced obesity, and contribute to peripheral arterial vasodilation in cirrhosis, thereby promoting portal hypertension. In addition, CB1 and CB2 receptors elicit dual opposite effects on fibrogenesis associated to chronic liver injury, by promoting pro- and antifibrogenic effects, respectively. Therefore, endocannabinoid-based therapies may open novel therapeutic avenues in the treatment of chronic liver diseases.

Animals↗
PubMed2006

Cannabinoids Potentiate Emotional Learning Plasticity in Neurons of the Medial Prefrontal Cortex through Basolateral Amygdala Inputs.

Cannabinoids represent one of the most commonly used hallucinogenic drug classes. In addition, cannabis use is a primary risk factor for schizophrenia in susceptible individuals and can potently modulate the emotional salience of sensory stimuli. We report that systemic activation or blockade of cannabinoid CB1 receptors modulates emotional associative learning and memory formation in a subpopulation of neurons in the mammalian medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC) that receives functional input from the basolateral amygdala (BLA). Using in vivo single-unit recordings in rats, we found that a CB1 receptor agonist potentiated the response of medial prefrontal cortical neurons to olfactory cues paired previously with a footshock, whereas this associative responding was prevented by a CB1 receptor antagonist. In an olfactory fear-conditioning procedure, CB1 agonist microinfusions into the mPFC enabled behavioral responses to olfactory cues paired with normally subthreshold footshock, whereas the antagonist completely blocked emotional learning. These results are the first demonstration that cannabinoid signaling in the mPFC can modulate the magnitude of neuronal emotional learning plasticity and memory formation through functional inputs from the BLA.

Action Potentials↗
PubMed2004

Endocannabinoid receptor antagonists: potential for obesity treatment.

Obesity has been described as a global epidemic. Its increasing prevalence is matched by growing costs, not only to the health of the individual, but also to the medical services required to treat a range of obesity-related diseases. In most instances, obesity is a product of progressively less energetic lifestyles and the over-consumption of readily available, palatable, and highly caloric foods. Past decades have seen massive investment in the search for effective anti-obesity therapies, so far with limited success. An important part of the process of developing new pharmacologic treatments for obesity lies in improving our understanding of the psychologic and physiologic processes that govern appetite and bodyweight regulation. Recent discoveries concerning the endogenous cannabinoids are beginning to give greater insight into these processes. Current research indicates that endocannabinoids may be key to the appetitive and consummatory aspects of eating motivation, possibly mediating the craving for and enjoyment of the most desired, most fattening foods. Additionally, endocannabinoids appear to modulate central and peripheral processes associated with fat and glucose metabolism. Selective cannabinoid receptor antagonists have been shown to suppress the motivation to eat, and preferentially reduce the consumption of palatable, energy-dense foods. Additionally, these agents act to reduce adiposity through metabolic mechanisms that are independent of changes in food intake. Given the current state of evidence, we conclude that the endocannabinoids represent an exciting target for new anti-obesity therapies.

Cannabinoid Receptor Antagonists↗
PubMed1997

Cannabinoid receptors CB1 and CB2: a characterization of expression and adenylate cyclase modulation within the immune system.

Cannabinoid receptor (CB) expression was characterized in immunological cell and tissue preparations. Northern analysis revealed approximately 6-kb transcripts for CB1 (brain-type) in mouse spleen and brain and in rat cerebellum. CB1 was not detected in mouse thymus or rat spleen RNA by Northern analysis. CB2 (peripheral) was detected as a approximately 4-kb transcript in mouse spleen and thymus and as approximately 2.4-kb transcripts in rat spleen. Quantitation of CB2 transcripts in mouse spleen and thymus revealed approximately 4 x 10(3) and approximately 4 x 10(2) molecules/100 ng RNA, respectively, with no quantifiable CB2 in mouse brain. Conversely, CB1 was expressed in mouse brain (approximately 2 x 10(5) molecules/100 ng RNA) with lower expression in mouse spleen (approximately 2 x 10(2) molecules/100 ng RNA) and was not quantifiable in mouse thymus. Competition binding in intact mouse splenocytes demonstrated that nonradiolabeled cannabinoids CP-55940, Win-55212-2, CP-56667, delta 9-THC, and cannabinol all competed for receptor binding with 3H-CP-55940, a high-affinity nondiscriminating CB1 and CB2 receptor ligand. Based on previous findings which demonstrated a marked inhibition of T-cell-dependent immune responses by cannabinoids, primary T cells and several T-cell lines were characterized. Radioligand binding analysis identified 100-300 cannabinoid receptor binding sites/cell with an approximate Kd of 200-700 pM in purified splenic T cells which also exhibited cannabinoid-induced inhibition of adenylate cyclase. Northern analysis of human T-cell lines revealed approximately 2.4-kb CB2 mRNA transcripts but no CB1 in HPB-ALL cells, a cell line which also exhibited inhibition of adenylate cyclase by delta 9-THC. Conversely, Jurkat E6-1 cells expressed an unusual mRNA banding pattern for CB2 expressing three distinct transcript sizes, none of which were 2.4 kb, the size for human CB2. Jurkat also did not express CB1 mRNA and did not exhibit inhibition of adenylate cyclase when treated with delta 9-THC. Collectively, these results provide further evidence that CB2 is the predominant cannabinoid receptor within the immune system and that this form of the receptor is expressed on T cells.

Adenylyl Cyclases↗
PubMed2006

Novel signals for plant development.

Classic signal molecules such as auxin, cytokinin, gibberellins, abscisic acid and more recently brassinosteroids have been extensively studied in the context of their role in morphogenetic processes in plants. In the past five years, it has become apparent that there are novel signaling molecules, such as N-acylethanolamides, alkamides, glutamate and nitric oxide, that might play important roles in the regulation of morphogenetic and adaptive processes. There is information pointing out that these molecules might be involved in diverse processes, including seed germination, pathogenesis, modulation of plant architecture and response to abiotic factors. In animals, alkamides and N-acylethanolamides act as endogenous signaling molecules that activate cannabinoid receptors, which are coupled to signal transduction cascades involving glutamate and nitric oxide. Hence, there is a possibility that cannabinoid signaling represents an evolutionary conserved pathway that modulates cellular and physiological processes in eukaryotes.

Amides↗
PubMed2006

Local interneurons regulate synaptic strength by retrograde release of endocannabinoids.

Neurons release endocannabinoids from their dendrites to trigger changes in the probability of transmitter release. Although such retrograde signaling has been described for principal neurons, such as hippocampal pyramidal cells and cerebellar Purkinje cells (PCs), it has not been demonstrated for local interneurons. Here we tested whether inhibitory interneurons in the cerebellum, stellate cells (SCs) and basket cells, regulate the strength of parallel fiber (PF) synapses by releasing endocannabinoids. We found that depolarization-induced suppression of excitation (DSE) is present in both SCs and basket cells. The properties of retrograde inhibition were examined more thoroughly for SCs. Both DSE and synaptically evoked suppression of excitation (SSE) triggered with brief PF bursts require elevations of postsynaptic calcium, are blocked by a type 1 cannabinoid receptor (CB1R) antagonist, and are absent in mice lacking the CB1R. SSE for SCs is similar to that described previously for PCs in that it is prevented by BAPTA and DAG lipase inhibitors in the recording pipette; however, unlike in PCs, NMDA receptors (NMDARs) play an important role in SSE for SCs. Although SCs express CB1Rs postsynaptically, neither high-frequency firing of SCs nor PF bursts lead to autocrine suppression of subsequent SC activity. Instead, PF bursts decrease the amplitude of disynaptic inhibition in PCs by evoking endocannabinoid release that transiently reduces the ability of PF synapses to trigger spikes in SCs. Thus, local interneurons within the cerebellum can release endocannabinoids through metabotropic glutamate receptor- and NMDAR-dependent mechanisms and contribute to use-dependent modulation of circuit properties.

Action Potentials↗
PubMed2006

Postsynaptic origin of CB1-dependent tonic inhibition of GABA release at cholecystokinin-positive basket cell to pyramidal cell synapses in the CA1 region of the rat hippocampus.

Cholecystokinin-positive (CCK+) basket cells are a major source of perisomatic GABAergic inputs to CA1 pyramidal cells. These interneurons express high levels of presynaptic cannabinoid type 1 (CB1) receptors that mediate short-term depression of GABA release following depolarization of postsynaptic cells. However, it is not known whether GABA release from CA1 CCK+ basket cells is under tonic endocannabinoid inhibition. In paired patch-clamp recordings, action potentials in presynaptic CCK+ basket cells evoked large IPSCs with fast kinetics in pyramidal cells. The proportion of action potentials that failed to evoke GABA release varied markedly between pairs, from highly reliable to virtually silent connections. Application of the CB1 receptor antagonist AM251 (10 microm) decreased the proportion of failures, revealing a persistent suppression of synaptic transmission by CB1 receptors. However, AM251 had no significant effect on the failure rate when the calcium chelator BAPTA (10 mm) was introduced into the postsynaptic cell, indicating that the tonic inhibition of GABA release by CB1 receptors is homosynaptically controlled by the postsynaptic cell, and that it is not due to constitutive CB1 receptor activity. Application of muscarinic or metabotropic glutamate receptor agonists inhibited synaptic transmission exclusively through the release of endocannabinoids from postsynaptic cells in a manner that could not be blocked by postsynaptic BAPTA, and had no direct effect on transmission. In contrast, GABA(B) receptor activation directly blocked GABA release, but there was no evidence for tonic inhibition of GABA release by GABA(B) receptors. Neither serotonergic nor mu-opioid agonists had significant influence on GABA release from CCK+ axon terminals. These results reveal that GABA release from CA1 CCK+ basket cells is under homosynaptic tonic inhibition by endocannabinoids, and it is subject to both direct and indirect modulation by various G-protein-dependent neuromodulators.

Animals↗