Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Basiliximab”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 415 records · Page 23Linked to original sources

The promise of C2, Simulect, and Certican in heart transplantation.

Immunosuppressive therapy in clinical transplantation has evolved from general nonspecific suppression of the immune system to selective blockade of intracellular immune events, maximizing graft tolerance while minimizing toxicity. Cyclosporine 2-hour postdose level monitoring has been recommended as the single most sensitive sampling point for assessment of the area under the curve, and predictor of clinical outcomes in heart transplantation. Strategies for monitoring immunosuppressive drugs to improve efficacy without increased toxicity are critical as we move into the 21st century. Everolimus, a derivative of rapamycin, is a macrocyclic immunosuppressive agent with antiproliferative activity that is efficacious in preventing graft vasculopathy. Agents that increase the armamentarium against rejection allowing individualized therapy tailored to minimize complications, and prevent graft vasculopathy will improve our flexibility and may translate into improved long-term outcomes.

Antibodies, Monoclonal↗

Use of simulect can reduce the incidence of acute rejection and demonstrates with superior 3-year patient and graft survival rates in renal transplantation.

BACKGROUND: Acute rejection is a major cause of graft loss in renal transplantation. Because the highest risk for acute rejection is in the first month posttransplantation, improved prophylaxis could be most beneficial in this period. Simulect administration provides 30 to 45 days of immunoprophylaxis against acute rejection during the critical period after transplantation. OBJECTIVES: We sought to assess the incidence of acute rejection episodes and the safety and tolerability of Simulect plus Neoral immunosuppression. Patient and graft survival rates up to 3 years posttransplantation were evaluated. METHOD: Forty-one transplant recipients received Simulect by intravenous infusion of an initial 20-mg dose on the day of renal transplantation and a second 20-mg dose on day 4 posttransplant. All renal recipients received immunosuppression with Neoral and steroid. RESULTS: There were eight cases (19.5%) of acute rejection within 1 year. The rejection episodes were easily reversed with steroid pulse therapy in seven patients except for graft loss. The 1-, 2-, and 3-year graft survival rates were 95%, 93%, and 88%, respectively. Overall, the 3-year patient survival rate was 100%. CONCLUSIONS: Simulect in combination with Neoral and steroid-reduced the incidence of acute rejection without an increase in adverse events. The low incidence and severity of acute rejection may have led to the superior 3-year patient and graft survival rates in renal transplantation.

Adolescent↗

Multivariate analysis of antibody induction therapy and their associated outcomes in deceased donor transplants.

AIMS: The aims of this study were to describe factors associated with the use of overall induction, classes of induction agents, and to evaluate the incidence of acute rejection, short-term graft survival, and patient survival. METHODS: Of 24,901 transplants reported to the United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) between 1999 and 2001, 51% received induction therapy including Thymoglobulin (T; n = 3090), Simulect (S; n = 6063), or Zenapax (Z; n = 3755). Propensity scores (PS) were calculated to indicate factors associated with use of induction and for each induction agent. Outcome parameters included graft survival (GS), hazard ratio (HR) for graft loss (GL), and odds ratio (OR) for first-year acute rejection (AR). RESULTS: Pediatric (PS = 1.29; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.12-1.49, vs adults) and retransplanted recipients (PS = 1.36; 1.23-1.49, vs first) were more likely to receive induction. One-year GS (90.1 vs 88.0%; P < .001), GL = 0.92% (0.86-0.98; P = .01), and AR free = 0.74 (P < .001) were superior in patients receiving induction. Using multivariate analysis, the odds of rejection 0.73 (0.68-0.78), GL 0.91 (0.85-0.97), and death 0.90 (0.82-0.98) were lower in those receiving induction. Among patients given induction, those receiving T were more likely sensitized (PS = 1.50%; 1.31-1.71), retransplanted (PS = 1.51; 1.31-1.75), or had delayed graft function (PS = 1.75; 1.58-1.93). T decreased the odds of rejection compared with S or Z (OR = 0.74; 0.69-0.79), but the type of induction agent did not have an impact on graft outcome HR for T = 1.07 (0.96-1.19). CONCLUSIONS: The use of antibody induction was associated with lower risk of rejection and better GS. There were no differences in GS among individual regimens. Comparative safety data were not analyzed but should be taken into consideration when choosing antibody preparations.

Adult↗

Decrease of CD4+CD25+ T cells in peripheral blood after liver transplantation: association with immunosuppression.

CD25 (IL-2 receptor alpha-chain) marks a population of CD4-positive T cells with a suppressor phenotype. These CD4+CD25+ regulatory T cells can suppress both effector T cells and antigen-presenting cells and have been identified as a principle regulator of tolerance in experimental transplantation models. In the setting of human liver transplantation, however, little is known about the dynamics of these cells in relation to rejection, tolerance, and immunosuppression. In the current study we determined CD4+CD25+ T cell in blood of liver transplant recipients using flow cytometry and investigated a possible link with immunosuppressive therapies. Peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) of 27 liver transplant patients (pretransplantation and 12 months posttransplantation) and 16 healthy controls were included. We found that the percentages of CD25+ cells within the CD4 T-cell population was significantly reduced in more than two-thirds of patients 1 year after transplantation. Also the total percentage of CD4-positive T cells declined significantly within this period, making the absolute reduction of regulatory T cells after transplantation even more profound. Comparing PBMC samples of patients and healthy controls revealed an increased percentage of CD4+ T cells in the patients before transplantation, probably related to the chronic liver illness. The reduction in CD4+CD25+ T cells after transplantation was similar for different immunosuppression regiments. All patients, however, received calcineurin inhibitors, suggesting a possible suppressive effect of this therapy on regulatory T-cell levels in peripheral blood. Currently, assays for regulatory T-cell activity are used to further support this hypothesis.

Adrenal Cortex Hormones↗

Preliminary analysis of early outcomes of a prospective, randomized trial of complete steroid avoidance in liver transplantation.

Steroids are a mainstay in liver transplantation for induction and maintenance immunosuppression but are associated with significant adverse effects. While prior studies have successfully limited the use of steroids, whether complete steroid avoidance will improve outcomes remains unclear. To further evaluate the need for steroids, consenting patients who underwent liver transplantation between June 2002 and May 2004 were entered into a prospective, randomized trial to receive either standard therapy (tacrolimus, mycophenolate mofetil, steroid induction/maintenance) or complete steroid avoidance (standard therapy without steroid induction/maintenance). Clinically suspected rejection was confirmed by biopsy and treated with pulse steroid therapy. Outcomes were compared on an intention to treat basis. Of the 72 patients enrolled, 36 (50%) were randomized to the steroid avoidance group with a mean follow up of 412 +/- 41 days. Donor and recipient characteristics were similar between groups. The steroid avoidance group was more likely to have significant infections (52% vs 28%, P = .03). There was a trend toward an increased rate of acute rejection (25% vs 14%, P = .23). Twelve of 36 recipients (33%) enrolled in the steroid avoidance group later received steroids. The incidence of recurrent hepatitis C was similar between groups. The 1-year patient (90% vs 83%, P = .44) and graft survivals (90% vs 81%, P = .27) were similar between groups. These data suggest complete steroid avoidance in liver transplantation results in acceptable patient and graft survival. However, the potential long-term benefits of steroid avoidance, including a decrease in severity of recurrent hepatitis C, remain under investigation.

Adrenal Cortex Hormones↗

Long-term results of monoclonal anti-Il2-receptor antibody versus polyclonal antilymphocyte antibodies as induction therapy in renal transplantation.

We compared the influence of induction therapy on 5-year patient and graft survival as well as on renal function in 100 kidney graft recipients at low immunological risk treated with antilymphocyte globulin (n = 50) versus anti-IL-2R monoclonal antibody (n = 50) in a prospective multicenter study. Long-term immunosuppressive treatment included cyclosporine, mycophenolate mofetil, and a short course of steroids in all patients. Five year graft (86% vs 86%) and patient (94% vs 94%) survivals were identical in both study arms. Moreover, neither serum creatinine or proteinuria were significantly different between the two groups. Our results showed that the choice of the induction therapy seemed to not have a major impact on long-term outcomes among renal recipients at low immunological risk.

Antibodies, Monoclonal↗

Current immunosuppressive agents: efficacy, side effects, and utilization.

Advances in immunosuppressive therapy over the past decade have led to dramatic improvements in graft survival. With the development of new agents, the focus of the transplant community is to establish regimens that maintain excellent graft survival rates but with fewer toxicities including infection, nephrotoxicity, malignancy, and cosmetic effects. Examples include the use of steroid-free protocols and calcineurin avoidance regimens, which are currently being studied by NAPRTCS. The ultimate goal of transplant immunosuppressive therapy is the induction of tolerance. As we learn more about immune function from basic and clinical research, tolerance to allografts seems a more reachable goal.

Abatacept↗