Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Angiography”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 415 records · Page 23Linked to original sources
PubMed1998

[Angiography compared to high resolution magnetic resonance and digital angiography in atherosclerosis of the iliac-femoral arteries].

INTRODUCTION: Magnetic Resonance Angiography (MRA) potentials in all vascular districts have been largely applied also to peripheral vessels, where however there is no agreement as to the best type of sequence. We investigated the sensitivity, specificity and diagnostic accuracy of 2D TOF travel-sat MRA in the study of iliac-femoral artery stenoses. The gold standard was digital subtraction angiography (DSA). MATERIAL AND METHODS: Twenty patients (14 men and 6 women, mean age: 65 years with suspected atheromasic disease were examined. Diagnostic MRA and DSA were carried out within 48 hours of each other. A super-conductive 1 T magnet (Siemens Impact) and a body coil were used. 2D TOF travel-sat sequences were carried out with the following parameters: FA 40 degrees, TR 31 ms, ST 10 mm, overlap 1 mm, MA 128 x 512. The images acquired on the axial plane were postprocessed with MIP on the z axis from -15 degrees to 15 degrees. Two different radiologists evaluated MRA and DSA images and graded the stenoses on a multiple choice card: 1) negative, 2) 1-40%, 3) 41-70%, 4) 71-99%, 5) occlusion. RESULTS: MRA diagnosed 90 positives and 110 negatives: 60 were true positives, 92 true negatives, 30 false positives and 18 false negatives. MRA overestimated 8 cases and underestimated 4 cases. DSA findings were negative in 122 cases and positive in 78 cases: 4 grade 2, 10 grade 3, 28 grade 4 and 36 grade 5. Relative to DSA, MRA sensitivity, specificity and diagnostic accuracy were 72%, 75% and 74%, respectively; MRA diagnostic accuracy, sensitivity and specificity in hemodynamically severe stenoses (> 71%) were 80%, 78% and 71.8%, respectively. CONCLUSION: Our study confirms the usefulness of 2D TOF travel-sat MRA in the study of iliac-femoral stenoses.

Adult↗
PubMed1998

[Stenosis-occlusion of the carotid bifurcation. Angiography with MR and contrast media versus digital angiography].

PURPOSE: To evaluate the comparative sensitivity, specificity and diagnostic accuracy of contrast enhanced magnetic resonance angiography (CE MRA) and digital subtraction angiography (DSA) in the study of carotid bifurcation stenoses. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Twenty-three patients with suspected cerebrovascular insufficiency by carotid stenosis were examined with CE MRA and DSA within 24 hours of each other. A 1.5 superconductive unit (Signa, General Electric) was used for CE MRA; fast spoiled gradient echo recalled (SPGR) images were acquired on the coronal plane 12 s after contrast medium injection, with the following parameters: TR/TE/FA 8/1/60, MA 256 x 128, NEX 1, FOV 18 x 13, slices/slab 28, slice thickness 1 mm, TA 32 s. The images were postprocessed with the maximum intensity projection (MIP) and the targeted MIP algorithms. A Siemens Politron 1000 VR unit was used for DSA examinations. RESULTS: DSA diagnosed 21 true positives, namely 4 grade II, 4 grade III, 10 grade IV and 3 grade V stenoses. CE MRA scored 100% in stenosis identification and grading, accurately diagnosing all the true negatives and the true positives and was always in agreement with DSA as to stenosis site. CONCLUSION: CE MRA can be considered the technique of choice to study stenosis occlusion in the epiaortic vessels, because it permits a rapid panoramic study of the neck vessels and accurate stenosis grading with similar patterns to those of DSA. Thus, CE MRA appears to be a valid alternative to DSA.

Aged↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Evaluation of the iliac arteries: comparison of two-dimensional time of flight magnetic resonance angiography with cardiac compensated fast gradient recalled echo and contrast-enhanced three-dimensional time of flight magnetic resonance angiography.

We compared dynamic contrast-enhanced three-dimensional time of flight (3DTOF) magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) with two-dimensional time of flight (2DTOF) MRA with cardiac compensated fast gradient recalled echo (C-MON) and conventional angiography (CA) when it was available. C-MON re-orders the normal data acquisition to minimize ghosting artifacts generated by pulsatile flow. The initial phase of the study involved optimization of parameters and comparison C-MON with no C = MON in eight patients and volunteers. The final phase of the study involved 53 patients who were imaged with contrast-enhanced 3DTOF MRA and 2DTOF MRA with C-MON. Thirty of these patients also had CA. In the initial phase, 2DTOF MRA with C-MON was found to be equal (n = 3) or superior (n = 5) to 2DTOF without C-MON. In the final phase, the agreement among all imaging modalities varied from substantial to almost perfect (Cohen's kappa = .6-.83). The lowest agreement was using 2DTOF to evaluate the external iliac segments. The among suggested treatments varied from substantial to almost perfect for all imaging modalities (Cohen's kappa = .73-93). The diagnostic efficacies of 2DTOF with C-MON and contrast-enhanced 3DTOF were high overall, with the lowest value being a specificity of 63% for one reader in the evaluation of an external iliac segment using 2DTOF. In summary, 2DTOF with C-MON helped to eliminate artifacts due to pulsatility in the iliac arterial segments. In our experience, both dynamic contrast-enhanced 3DTOF MRA and 2DTOF MRA with C-MON performed well in the evaluation of the iliac arteries. Both studies have high interobeserver agreement and high diagnostic efficacy. Contrast-enhanced 3DTOF MRA should be reserved for situations in which the iliac vessels are extremely tortuous or occluded or the external iliac segments are poorly seen.

Adult↗
PubMed2006

Preoperative evaluation of the hepatic vascular anatomy in living liver donors: comparison of CT angiography and MR angiography.

PURPOSE: To compare the diagnostic performance of CT angiography (CTA) and MR angiography (MRA) for preoperative hepatic vascular evaluation in living liver donors. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty-eight living donor candidates underwent preoperative CTA and MRA. Two blinded radiologists evaluated the anatomic types of the hepatic artery (HA) and portal vein (PV), and the number of aberrant hepatic veins (HVs) on both CTA and MRA, independently. Four grades of confidence levels were used to indicate the clarity of depiction of the HA and PV. Surgical findings were used as a standard of reference. RESULTS: For determining the anatomic types of the HA and PV, and the number of aberrant HVs, CTA and MRA did not significantly differ in terms of accuracy ([89%, 96%, and 68% on CTA] vs. [86%, 93%, and 68% on MRA] for reader 1, P>0.05; and [93%, 100%, and 86% on CTA] vs. [89%, 93%, and 79% on MRA] for reader 2, P>0.05). Confidence for the depiction of major branches of HA and PV did not differ between CTA and MRA, except for a better depiction of the left HA (LHA) on CTA (P<0.05) CONCLUSION: In living donor candidates, both CTA and MRA can provide a complete evaluation of the hepatic vascular anatomy.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1986

[New diagnostic possibilities of postmortam coronary angiography by digital subtraction angiography].

Postmortal digital subtraction angiography permits vessels filled with a contrast agent to be visualized selectively in a video film shot and the contrast agent flow to be observed directly in the coronary arteries. Compared to conventional static methods of postmortal coronary angiography, the judgment on the hemodynamic effects of stenosis and occlusion, as well as of collaterals and anastomosis, will be improved and therefore the diagnosis of acute coronary death. The diagnostic possibilities and advantages of DSA are demonstrated in two cases.

Adult↗
PubMed1985

Digital subtraction angiography (DSA) in the evaluation of brain death. A comparison of conventional cerebral angiography with intravenous and intraarterial DSA.

Demonstration that intracranial circulation has ceased is the ultimate proof of brain death. This study was performed to evaluate digital subtraction angiography (DSA) compared with conventional cerebral angiography in the diagnosis of brain death. Intravenous as well as intraarterial DSA was found suitable in the diagnosis of arrested intracranial circulation.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1991

Comparison of magnetic resonance angiography, magnetic resonance imaging and conventional angiography in cerebral arteriovenous malformation.

10 patients with an AVM of the brain were examined by magnetic resonance angiography (MRA), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and conventional cerebral angiography (CCA). From MRA in 7/10 patients important information about vascular supply could be provided; in 3 patients, all with small AVM's it could be only suspected. CCA revealed the vascularisation of the AVM's in all patients and showed additional hemodynamic aspects better than MRA. With MRI in all cases the AVM could be diagnosed, but only the involvement of the main cerebral vessels could be demonstrated: however, MRI is superior to MRA and CCA in showing the nidus and the involved brain structures.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1985

Digital subtraction angiography (DSA): new perspectives in angiography.

Digital subtraction angiography (DSA) has strongly influenced angiographic procedures. Because it is less invasive it has increased the total number of angiographies in all places where it was introduced. The paper gives an introduction to the procedure explaining the roles of "digital" and "subtraction" in DSA. It is written from a technical point of view. The examples are taken from and with the DVI system.

Analog-Digital Conversion↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Spiral computed tomographic angiography of the renal arteries: a prospective comparison with intravenous and intraarterial digital subtraction angiography.

PURPOSE: To assess the accuracy of computed tomographic angiography (CTA) in the evaluation of the renal arteries in comparison with intravenous (IVDSA) and intraarterial digital subtraction angiography (IADSA). METHODS: In 18 patients, 35 CTAs and DSAs (27 IADSA, 8 IVDSA) of the renal arteries were performed. CTA was done with 2-3 mm collimation,2-4 mm/sec table speed, after intravenous injection of 80 ml of contrast medium at 4 ml/sec with a scanning delay time of 14-21 sec. No previous circulation time curve was performed. CTA data were reconstructed with maximum intensity projection (MIP) and shaded surface display (SSD). The presence of stenosis was assessed on a three-point rating scale (grade 1-3). The quality of the examinations; visualization of the ostium, the main artery, and its branches; vessel sharpness, linearity, and intraluminal contrast filling were evaluated. We compared CTA with DSA. RESULTS: CTA had 96% sensitivity, 77% specificity, and 89% accuracy in the detection of stenoses > 50%. Due to technical errors two stenoses were erroneously diagnosed as positive but there were no false negative diagnoses. The quality of CTA was good in 56% and moderate in 34% of cases. Visualization of the ostium and main artery was graded as 1.74 (out of 2) points and of the renal branches as 1.02 (out of 2) points and of the renal branches as 1.02 (out of 2) points. The quality of CTA images was worse than that of IADSA in 52%, equal in 41%, and better in 7% of cases. CTA was equal to IVDSA in 25% and better in 75% of the cases. CONCLUSION: CTA is an accurate noninvasive method for the evaluation of renal arteries. Examination quality is essential for the diagnosis. CTA is limited in its ability to visualize the branches of the renal artery and accessory arteries. CTA seems to be superior to IVDSA.

Adult↗
PubMed2005

Intra-venous digital subtraction angiography: an alternative method to intra-arterial digital subtraction angiography for experimental aneurysm imaging.

Conventional intra-arterial digital subtraction angiography (IADSA), which necessitates surgical exposure and ligation of the femoral artery, is an invasive and expensive method of evaluation for experimental elastase-induced aneurysms in rabbits. The purpose of this study was to examine and validate intra-venous digital subtraction angiography (IVDSA) as an alternative to IADSA by comparing their diagnostic accuracies. We performed both IVDSA and IADSA for 24 elastase-induced saccular aneurysms in a rabbit model, 1 month following creation. Aneurysm sizes (neck, width and height) from both the IVDSA and IADSA procedures were evaluated and measured. Comparison of the aneurysm sizes between IVDSA and IADSA were performed with the Wilcoxon paired signed-rank test. All the aneurysms were seen clearly in both the IVDSA and IADSA techniques. Mean sizes of the IVDSA aneurysm neck, width and height were 3.41 +/- 0.80 mm, 3.61 +/- 0.93 mm and 8.07 +/- 2.11 mm, respectively. Mean sizes of the IADSA aneurysm neck, width and height were 3.43 +/- 0.80 mm, 3.66 +/- 0.92 mm and 8.16 +/- 2.25 mm, respectively. No significant difference was found in the sizes of the aneurysm neck, width and height between the two groups (P = 0.311, P = 0.086 and P = 0.258, respectively). IVDSA appears to be an alternative method for evaluating elastase-induced aneurysms in rabbits.

Angiography, Digital Subtraction↗
PubMed2003

Value of contrast-enhanced MR angiography and helical CT angiography in chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension.

The aim of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic value of contrast-enhanced MR angiography (ce MRA) and helical CT angiography (CTA) of the pulmonary arteries in the preoperative workup of patients with chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH). The ce MRA and CTA studies of 32 patients were included in this retrospective evaluation. Image quality was scored by two independent blinded observers. Data sets were assessed for number of patent segmental, subsegmental arteries, and number of vascular segments with thrombotic wall thickening, intraluminal webs, and abnormal proximal to distal tapering. Image quality for MRA/CTA was scored excellent in 16 of 16, good in 11 of 14, moderate in 2 of 5, and poor in no examinations. The MRA/CTA showed 357 of 366 patent segmental and 627 of 834 patent subsegmental arteries. CTA was superior to MRA in visualization of thrombotic wall thickening (339 vs 164) and of intraluminal webs (257 vs 162). Abnormal proximal to distal tapering was better assessed by MRA than CTA (189 vs 16). In joint assessment of direct and indirect signs, MRA and CTA were equally effective (353 vs 355). MRA and CTA are equally effective in the detection of segmental occlusions of the pulmonary arteries in CTEPH. CTA is superior for the depiction of patent subsegmental arteries, of intraluminal webs, and for the direct demonstration of thrombotic wall thickening.

Adult↗
PubMed2005

Computed tomography angiography versus digital subtraction angiography in vascular mapping for planning of microsurgical reconstruction of the mandible.

The aim of this work was to compare the potential of computed tomography angiography (CTA) with that of digital subtraction angiography (DSA) in vascular mapping of the external carotid artery (ECA) branches for planning of microvascular reconstructions of the mandible with osteomyocutaneous flaps. In 15 patients CTA and DSA were performed prior to surgery. Selective common carotid angiograms were acquired in two projection for both sides of the neck. Sixteen-slice spiral computed tomography was performed with a dual-phase protocol, using the arterial phase images for 3D CTA reconstruction. Thin-slab maximum intensity projections and volume rendering were employed for postprocessing of CTA data. The detectability of the different ECA branches in CTA and DSA was evaluated by two examiners. No statistically significant differences between CTA and DSA (p=0.097) were found for identifying branches relevant for microsurgery. DSA was superior to CTA if more peripheral ECA branches were included (P=0.030). CTA proved to be a promising alternative to DSA in vascular mapping for planning of microvascular reconstruction of the mandible.

Angiography, Digital Subtraction↗
PubMed1999

Spiral CT angiography of renal arteries: comparison with angiography.

A prospective study was carried out to determine the accuracy of spiral CT angiography (CTA) in the detection of renal artery stenosis (RAS). Eighty-two patients with arterial hypertension underwent CTA and digital subtraction angiography (DSA) to exclude RAS. For CTA a contrast medium bolus of 100-150 ml (flow rate 3 ml/s) was injected. A 24 or 40 s CTA was started at the origin of the superior mesenteric artery after a delay time determined by test bolus injection (collimation = 2 mm, pitch = 1/1.5). For stenosis detection transverse images supported by maximum intensity projections (MIP) or multiplanar reconstruction projections were used. Of 197 renal arteries examined (including 33 accessory arteries), 34 RAS were visualized using DSA. With CTA, one hemodynamic RAS was missed and one additional hemodynamic RAS was found. Sensitivity/specificity was calculated to be 94 %/98 %. For hemodynamically relevant RAS (> 50 %) the sensitivity/specificity was 96 %/99 %. CTA additionally depicted five adrenal masses. The high accuracy rate of RAS detection thus allows the use of CTA as a screening method in patients with arterial hypertension to exclude a renovascular cause.

Adult↗
PubMed2005

Non-invasive coronary angiography with multi-detector computed tomography: comparison to conventional X-ray angiography.

Selective coronary angiography introduced clinical coronary imaging in the late 1950s. The angiographic identification of high-grade coronary lesions in patients with acute and chronic symptomatic coronary artery disease (CAD) led to the development of surgical and percutaneous coronary revascularization. However, the fact that CAD remains the major cause of death in North America and Europe demonstrates the need for novel, complementary diagnostic strategies. These are driven by the need to characterize both increasingly advanced disease stages but also early, asymptomatic disease development. Complex revascularization techniques for patients with advanced disease stages will initiate a growing demand for 3-dimensional coronary imaging and integration of imaging modalities with new mechanical therapeutic devices. An emerging focus is atherosclerosis imaging with the goal to identify subclinical disease stages as the basis for pharmacological intervention aimed at disease stabilization or reversal. Non-invasive coronary imaging with coronary multidetector computed tomographic angiography (MDCTA) allows both assessment of luminal stenosis and subclinical disease of the arterial wall. Its complementary role in the assessment of early and advanced stages of CAD is increasingly recognized.

Contrast Media↗
PubMed1994

Comparison of three-dimensional phase-contrast magnetic resonance angiography with three-dimensional time-of-flight magnetic resonance angiography in cerebral aneurysms.

Magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) can be divided into two types: namely, the phase-contrast (PC) method and the time-of-flight (TOF) method. The purpose of this study is to determine which method is better suited to demonstrate cerebral aneurysms. In a total of 27 cerebral aneurysms confirmed by cerebral angiography, both three-dimensional (3-D) PC and 3-D TOF methods were performed, and the corresponding findings were compared with conventional cerebral angiographic findings. Aneurysm visualization was grouped into three categories: "good" when clearly distinguishable, "fair" if distinguishable when reconstructed, and "poor" if completely undistinguishable. All MRAs were independently interpreted by two neurosurgeons in our institute. Sensitivity was 92.6% when MRA was performed with the TOF method, whereas it was 70.4% when performed with the PC method. In conclusion, the TOF method was more useful for demonstrating the aneurysms than the PC method due to its higher spatial resolution and shorter imaging time.

Adult↗
PubMed2006

16-detector row computed tomographic coronary angiography in patients undergoing evaluation for aortic valve replacement: comparison with catheter angiography.

AIM: To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of 16-detector row computed tomography (CT) in assessing haemodynamically significant coronary artery stenoses in patients under evaluation for aortic stenosis pre-aortic valve replacement. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Forty consecutive patients under evaluation for severe aortic stenosis and listed for cardiac catheterization before potential aortic valve replacement underwent coronary artery calcium (CAC) scoring and retrospective electrocardiogram (ECG)-gated multi-detector row computed tomographic coronary angiography (MDCTA) using a GE Lightspeed 16-detector row CT within 1 month of invasive coronary angiography (ICA) for comparative purposes. All 13 major coronary artery segments of the American Heart Association model were evaluated for the presence of > or =50% stenosis and compared to the reference standard. Data were analysed on a segment-by-segment basis and also in "whole patient" terms. RESULTS: A total of 412/450 segments from 35 patients were suitable for analysis. The overall accuracy of MDCTA for detection of segments with > or =50% stenosis was high, with a sensitivity of 81.3%, specificity 95.0%, positive predictive value (PPV) 57.8%, and negative predictive value (NPV) 98.4%. On a "whole-patient" basis, 100% (19/19) of patients with significant coronary disease were correctly identified and there were no false-negatives. Excluding patients with CAC >1000 from the analysis improved the accuracy of MDCTA to: sensitivity 90%, specificity 98.1%, PPV 60%, NPV 99.7%. CONCLUSION: Non-invasive 16-detector row MDCTA accurately excludes significant coronary disease in patients with severe aortic stenosis undergoing evaluation before aortic valve replacement and in whom ICA can therefore be avoided. Its segment-by-segment accuracy is improved further if CAC>1000 is used as a gatekeeper to MDCTA.

Adult↗
PubMed1983

Digital subtraction intravenous left ventricular angiography: comparison with conventional intraventricular angiography.

Standard contrast left ventriculography with catheter placement into the left ventricle entails risks and inconvenience. Computer-based digital subtraction techniques now permit high contrast left ventriculography after intravenous administration of contrast medium. To compare the accuracy of intravenous digital subtraction left ventriculography with film-based, standard contrast ventriculography, we assessed left ventricular function by both methods in 32 patients (8 with valvular disease, 22 with coronary disease and 2 with atypical pain). Studies in 31 of 32 patients were considered. Left ventricular ejection fraction by standard contrast ventriculography ranged from 24 to 88%. Digital subtraction angiography was performed with bolus injection of radiopaque contrast material (30 cc at 20 cc/s) into the inferior vena cava. The two methods correlated closely in end-diastolic volume (correlation coefficient [r] = 0.96, probability [p] less than 0.001), end-systolic volume (r = 0.97, p less than 0.001) and ejection fraction (r = 0.98, p less than 0.001). Segmental function was assessed visually; precise agreement existed between the two techniques in 123 (79%) of the 155 segments (p less than 0.001). It is concluded that intravenous digital angiography provides left ventricular images of sufficiently good quality to allow accurate quantitative assessment of global left ventricular function and volumes as well as determination of regional function.

Adult↗
PubMed2003

Carbon dioxide angiography in lower limbs: a prospective comparative study with selective iodinated contrast angiography.

This was a prospective comparison of the accuracy and image quality of carbon dioxide digital subtraction angiography (CO2 DSA) and iodinated contrast digital subtraction angiography (ICDSA) in evaluating lower extremity arteries and patient tolerance of the procedures. Selective DSA was performed in 14 Taiwanese patients who were diagnosed with peripheral artery occlusive disease (PAOD). Both contrast materials were administered through mechanical injectors. Post-processing of the image used pixel shifting. Images of vessels were divided into 22 anatomic segments and evaluated by two experienced radiologists. A four-point scale was used to classify diseased vessels. Two interpreters rated the CO2 DSA image against the ICDSA image on a three-point scale. Patient tolerance was assessed from verbal descriptions. Cohen's kappa was used to determine interobserver agreement and descriptive statistics were used to summarize patient experience. Interobserver agreement ranged from fair to excellent, with most being good or excellent. Three patients (21.4%) could not tolerate the whole procedure and nine patients (64.3%) reported discomfort during the CO2 DSA procedure. CO2 DSA image quality was better for the thigh than the distal runoff and pelvic regions. Our results showed that selective CO2 DSA cannot replace ICDSA as a routine diagnostic tool for PAOD because it does not give images of comparative quality.

Aged↗