Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Simvastatin”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 397 records · Page 22Linked to original sources
PubMed2006

Simvastatin attenuates plaque inflammation: evaluation by fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography.

OBJECTIVES: We investigated whether simvastatin attenuates plaque inflammation by using 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (18FDG-PET) co-registered with computerized tomography. BACKGROUND: Inflammation plays a key role in progression and destabilization of atherosclerotic plaque. 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose PET is a promising tool for visualizing inflammation of atherosclerotic plaque. Antiinflammatory action is one of the pleiotropic effects of statins. METHODS: Forty-three consecutive subjects, who underwent 18FDG-PET for cancer screening and had 18FDG uptakes in the thoracic aorta and/or the carotid arteries, were randomized to either statin group receiving simvastatin (n = 21) or diet group receiving dietary management only (n = 22). The maximum standardized uptake values (SUVs) were measured in individual plaques, and were averaged for analysis of the subjectwise results. The responses were assessed after 3-month treatments. RESULTS: Positron emission tomography revealed 117 and 123 18FDG-positive plaques in the statin and diet groups, respectively. Simvastatin, but not diet alone, attenuated plaque (18)FDG uptakes and decreased the SUVs (p < 0.01). Simvastatin reduced low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) by 30% (p < 0.01) and increased high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) by 15% (p < 0.01), whereas LDL-C and HDL-C levels were not changed in the diet group. In the statin group, the decrease in the SUV was well correlated with the HDL-C elevation (p < 0.01) but not with the LDL-C reduction. CONCLUSIONS: 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose PET visualized plaque inflammation and simvastatin attenuated it. The LDL-C-independent effects of simvastatin may participate in the beneficial effect. 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose PET has a potential for visually monitoring plaque inflammation and the therapeutic effectiveness of statins.

Aged↗
PubMed2004

Effect of simvastatin on remodeling of the left ventricle and aorta in L-NAME-induced hypertension.

3-Hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A (HMG-CoA) reductase inhibitors have been shown to prevent or reverse hypertrophy of the LV in several models of left ventricular hypertrophy. The aim of the present study was to determine whether treatment with simvastatin can prevent hypertension, reduction of tissue nitric oxide synthase activity and left ventricular (LV) remodeling in NG-nitro-L-arginine methyl ester(L-NAME)-induced hypertension. Four groups of rats were investigated: control, simvastatin (10 mg/kg), L-NAME (40 mg/kg) and L-NAME + simvastatin (in corresponding doses). Animals were sacrificed and studied after 6 weeks of treatment. The decrease of NO-synthase activity in the LV, kidney and brain was associated with hypertension, LV hypertrophy and fibrosis development and remodeling of the aorta in the L-NAME group. Simvastatin attenuated the inhibition of NO-synthase activity in kidney and brain, partly prevented hypertension development and reduced the concentration of coenzyme Q in the LV. Nevertheless, myocardial hypertrophy, fibrosis and enhancement of DNA concentration in the LV, and remodeling of the aorta were not prevented by simultaneous simvastatin treatment in the L-NAME treated animals. We conclude that the HMG-CoA reductase inhibitor simvastatin improved nitric oxide production and partially prevented hypertension development, without preventing remodeling of the left ventricle and aorta in NO-deficient hypertension.

Animals↗
PubMed2004

Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic interactions between simvastatin and diltiazem in patients with hypercholesterolemia and hypertension.

Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic interactions between simvastatin, a 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A (HMG-CoA) reductase inhibitor, and diltiazem, a calcium antagonist, were investigated in 7 male and 4 female patients with hypercholesterolemia and hypertension. The patients were given, for one in a three consecutive 4-week periods, oral simvastatin (5 mg/day), oral simvastatin (5 mg/day) combined with diltiazem (90 mg/day), and then oral diltiazem (90 mg/day), respectively. The area under the plasma concentration versus time curve up to 6 hours post-dose (AUC0-6h) and maximum plasma concentrations (Cmax) of the drugs, serum lipid profiles, blood pressures and liver functions were assessed on the last day of each of the three 4-week periods. After the combined treatment period, Cmax of HMG-CoA reductase inhibitor was elevated from 7.8 +/- 2.6 ng/ml to 15.4 +/- 7.9 ng/ml (P < 0.01) and AUC0-6h from 21.7 +/- 4.9 ng x hr/ml to 43.3 +/- 23.4 ng x hr/ml (P < 0.01), while Cmax of diltiazem was decreased from 74.2 +/- 36.4 ng/ml to 58.6 +/- 18.9 ng/ml (P < 0.05) and its AUC0-6h from 365 +/- 153 ng x hr/ml to 287 +/- 113 ng x hr/ml (P < 0.01). Compared to simvastatin monotherapy, combined treatment further reduced LDL-cholesterol levels by 9%, from 129 +/- 16 mg/dl to 119 +/- 17 mg/dl (P < 0.05). No adverse events were observed throughout the study. These apparent pharmacokinetic interactions, namely the increase of HMG-CoA reductase inhibitor concentration by diltiazem and the decrease of diltiazem concentration by simvastatin, enhance the cholesterol-lowering effects of simvastatin during combined treatment.

Administration, Oral↗
PubMed2004

Simvastatin induces proliferation inhibition and apoptosis in C6 glioma cells via c-jun N-terminal kinase.

The lipid-lowering drugs, statins, induce apoptosis in a variety of tumor cells. Here we investigated the apoptotic effect of the lipophilic statin, simvastatin, in C6 glioma cells and the underlying effects on intracellular signal transduction. Simvastatin inhibited cell proliferation totally after 20h of treatment as shown by the decrease in proliferating cell nuclear antigen expression in the nucleus. Subsequently, simvastatin caused apoptotic cell death by shrinkage of cytoplasm and condensation of chromatin, and DNA fragmentation. The features of apoptosis were visible only after 48 h of treatment, possibly reflecting a requirement for cell commitment to growth arrest. In immunocytochemical and immunoblotting experiments we have shown that simvastatin markedly increased the phosphorylation of ATF-2 and c-jun in the nucleus of the C6 glioma cells at early time points which was preserved even 24 h after treatment. In contrast, activities of protein kinases Erk1/2 and AKT in the cell survival pathway remained unchanged throughout the treatment. Selective inhibitor of JNK, but not p38 kinase, reduced simvastatin-induced cell death and ATF-2 and c-jun phosphorylation suggesting that JNK-dependent activation of ATF-2 and c-jun may play an important role in simvastatin-induced proliferation inhibition and apoptosis in C6 glioma cells. These observations suggest that statins may have clinical significance in the prevention of glial tumors beyond their cholesterol-lowering effect and JNK may be a rational target for sensitizing glioma cells to chemotherapeutic agents.

Activating Transcription Factor 2↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Effects of simvastatin administration in an experimental model of cancer cachexia.

OBJECTIVE: We evaluated whether statins, in view of their anti-inflammatory properties, may effectively prevent the onset or modulate the severity of muscle wasting during cancer cachexia. METHODS: Simvastatin was administered to rats bearing the Yoshida AH-130 ascites hepatoma, a well-studied cytokine-dependent experimental model of cancer cachexia. RESULTS: Quite surprisingly, the drug negatively affected the wasting pattern induced by the AH-130 hepatoma. In fact, the administration of simvastatin to tumor hosts induced a further weight reduction of all the tissues examined except for the soleus, in the absence of significant effects of simvastatin on tumor growth or on food intake. No effects were observed after simvastatin administration in control animals, with the exception of a significant (P < 0.05) reduction in heart weight. CONCLUSIONS: Simvastatin administration, although capable of negatively modulating the inflammatory response, did not prevent muscle wasting in this experimental model of cancer cachexia. Moreover, the further muscle loss observed in simvastatin-treated tumor-bearing animals suggests that a note of caution should be introduced in treating cancer patients with statins in view of the possible occurrence of harmful side effects.

Animals↗
PubMed2004

Effect of alpha-tocopherol and simvastatin on male fertility in hypercholesterolemic rats.

The effect of alpha-tocopherol, simvastatin and both on male fertility in hypercholesterolemic rats was studied. Induction of hypercholesterolemia was done by feeding rats on a diet containing 1% cholesterol for 30 days. Hypercholesterolemic rats were orally given alpha-tocopherol (3 mg kg(-1) BW) or simvastatin (1 mg kg(-1) BW) or both for 65 days. Fertility index, serum testosterone level, sex organs weight, semen analysis and histopathological examination of testes, seminal vesicles and prostate glands were the parameters used to evaluate the reproductive efficiency of rats. In hypercholesterolemic rats (control +ve), there was a marked decrease in fertility index, testicular weight, sperm cell count, and percentages of sperm motility and viability associated with a significant increase in sperm cell abnormalities. Oral administration of either alpha-tocopherol or simvastatin to hypercholesterolemic rats for 65 days significantly improved the fertility index, testicular weight and semen quality. Concomitant administration of alpha-tocopherol and simvastatin to hypercholesterolemic rats markedly increased fertility index and sperm motility and viability associated with a significant reduction of sperm cell abnormalities. Histopathological examination revealed that testes of hypercholesterolemic rats (control +ve) had degenerated, non-functioning and atrophied seminiferous tubules associated with arrest of spermatogenesis. Oral administration of alpha-tocopherol and simvastatin concomitantly to hypercholesterolemic rats resulted in active mature and full functioning seminiferous tubules. In conclusion, concomitant administration of alpha-tocopherol and simvastatin to hypercholesterolemic male rats improved their reproductive efficiency and produced additional protection against reduced fertility induced by hypercholesterolemia.

Administration, Oral↗
PubMed2003

Effect on high-density lipoprotein cholesterol of maximum dose simvastatin and atorvastatin in patients with hypercholesterolemia: results of the Comparative HDL Efficacy and Safety Study (CHESS).

BACKGROUND: Previous studies have shown that effects on high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) may differ among statins. METHODS: A multicenter, randomized, double-blind, parallel-dose study was conducted in 917 hypercholesterolemic patients to compare the efficacy of 80 mg/d simvastatin versus 80 mg/d atorvastatin on HDL-C and apolipoprotein (apo) A-I for 24 weeks. Efficacy was assessed as the means of weeks 6 and 12 and weeks 18 and 24. Prespecified subgroups analyzed were patients with low HDL-C levels and with the metabolic syndrome. RESULTS: Simvastatin increased HDL-C and apo A-I values significantly more than did atorvastatin for the mean of weeks 6 and 12 (8.9% vs 3.6% and 4.9% vs -0.9%, respectively) and the mean of weeks 18 and 24 (8.3% vs 4.2% and 3.7% vs -1.4%). These differences were observed across both baseline HDL-C subgroups (<40 mg/dL, > or =40 mg/dL) and in patients with the metabolic syndrome. Low-density lipoprotein cholesterol and triglyceride reductions were greater with atorvastatin. Consecutive elevations >3x the upper limit of normal in alanine aminotransferase (ALT) and/or aspartate aminotransferase (AST) occurred in significantly fewer patients treated with simvastatin than with atorvastatin (2/453 [0.4%] vs 13/464 [2.8%]), with most elevations observed in women taking atorvastatin (11/209 [5.3%] vs 1/199 [0.5%] for simvastatin). CONCLUSIONS: Simvastatin (80 mg) increased HDL-C and apo A-I significantly more than did atorvastatin (80 mg) in patients with hypercholesterolemia. This advantage was observed regardless of HDL-C level at baseline or the presence of the metabolic syndrome. Significantly fewer consecutive elevations >3x the upper limit of normal in ALT and/or AST occurred in patients receiving simvastatin.

Adult↗
PubMed1999

Comparison of the hypolipidemic effect of gemfibrozil versus simvastatin in patients with type III hyperlipoproteinemia.

BACKGROUND: Type III hyperlipoproteinemia is characterized by the accumulation of chylomicron and very low density lipoprotein (VLDL) remnants. Individuals with this disorder have a high risk of premature atherosclerosis, and hypolipidemic drugs are useful in their management. METHODS: We compared, in a double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized crossed study, the effects of gemfibrozil (1200 mg/day) and simvastatin (20 mg/day) on lipids, apolipoprotein AI, apolipoprotein B, and apolipoprotein E and on lipids and apolipoprotein B content in VLDL, intermediate-density lipoprotein (IDL), low-density lipoprotein (LDL), and high-density lipoprotein (HDL) in 10 patients with type III hyperlipoproteinemia. RESULTS: Levels of total cholesterol, VLDL cholesterol, IDL cholesterol, and apolipoprotein B decreased with both drugs. Larger reductions in triglycerides (109 +/- 28.2 mg/dL, P =.005), VLDL cholesterol (24.7 +/- 10.9 mg/dL, P =.05), and VLDL triglycerides (86.3 +/- 20.2 mg/dL, P =.003) were obtained with gemfibrozil compared with simvastatin. LDL cholesterol reduction was more effective with simvastatin than with gemfibrozil (44.3 +/- 17.1 mg/dL, P =.03). HDL cholesterol after gemfibrozil was 5.71 +/- 2.37 mg/dL higher than after simvastatin. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with type III hyperlipoproteinemia gemfibrozil is more effective in reducing total triglyceride and VLDL lipid levels than simvastatin, and simvastatin is better in reducing LDL cholesterol than gemfibrozil is. IDL and apolipoprotein E levels were reduced similarly with both drugs.

Adult↗
PubMed2000

Effects of simvastatin (40 and 80 mg/day) in patients with mixed hyperlipidemia.

Mixed hyperlipidemia is characterized by both elevated total cholesterol and triglycerides. It is estimated to account for 10% to 20% of patients with dyslipidemia. This study assessed the lipid-altering efficacy and tolerability of simvastatin 40 and 80 mg/day as monotherapy. One hundred thirty patients (62 women [48%], 24 [16%] with type 2 diabetes mellitus, mean age 53 years) with mixed hyperlipidemia (baseline low-density lipoprotein [LDL] cholesterol 156 mg/dl [mean], and triglycerides 391 mg/dl [median) were randomized in a multicenter, double-masked, placebo-controlled, 3-period, 22-week, balanced crossover study, and received placebo, and simvastatin 40 and 80 mg/day each for 6 weeks. Compared with placebo, simvastatin produced significant (p <0.01) and dose-dependent changes in all lipid and lipoprotein parameters (LDL cholesterol 2.1%, -28.9%, and -35.5%; triglycerides -3.5%, -27.8%, and -33.0%; high-density lipoprotein cholesterol 3.3%, 13.1%, and 15. 7%; apolipoprotein B 3.8%, -23.1%, and -30.6%; and apolipoprotein A-I 4.0%, 8.2%, and 10.5% with placebo, and simvastatin 40 and 80 mg/day, respectively). The changes were consistent in patients with diabetes mellitus. One patient taking simvastatin 80 mg/day had an asymptomatic and reversible increase in hepatic transaminases 3 times above the upper limit of normal. Simvastatin 40 and 80 mg/day is effective in patients with mixed hyperlipidemia across the entire lipid and lipoprotein profile. The reductions in LDL cholesterol and triglycerides are large, significant, and dose dependent. The increase in high-density lipoprotein cholesterol was greater than that observed in patients with hypercholesterolemia, and appears dose dependent.

Adult↗
PubMed2001

Comparison of efficacy and safety of atorvastatin (10mg) with simvastatin (10mg) at six weeks. ASSET Investigators.

The 6-week efficacy and safety of atorvastatin versus simvastatin was determined during a 54-week, open-label, multicenter, parallel-arm, treat-to-target study. In all, 1,424 patients with mixed dyslipidemia (triglyceride 200 to 600 mg/dl [2.26 to 6.77 mmol/L]) were stratified to 1 of 2 groups (diabetes or no diabetes). Patients were then randomized to receive either atorvastatin 10 mg/ day (n = 730) or simvastatin 10 mg/day (n = 694). Efficacy was determined by measuring changes from baseline in lipid parameters including low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol, total cholesterol, triglycerides, and apolipoprotein B. Compared with simvastatin, atorvastatin produced significantly greater (p < 0.0001) reductions from baseline in LDL cholesterol (37.2% vs 29.6%), total cholesterol (27.6% vs 21.5%), triglycerides (22.1% vs 16.0%), the ratio of LDL cholesterol to high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol (41.1% vs 33.7%), and apolipoprotein B (28.3% vs 21.2%), and a comparable increase from baseline in HDL cholesterol (7.4% vs 6.9%). Atorvastatin was also significantly (p < 0.0001) more effective than simvastatin at treating the overall patient population to LDL cholesterol goals (55.6% vs 38.4%). Fewer than 6% of patients in either treatment group experienced drug-attributable adverse events, which were mostly mild to moderate in nature. Diabetic patients treated with either statin had safety characteristics similar to nondiabetics, with atorvastatin exhibiting superior efficacy to simvastatin. In conclusion, atorvastatin, at a dose of 10 mg/day, is more effective than simvastatin 10 mg/day at lowering lipids and reaching LDL cholesterol goals in patients with mixed dyslipidemia. Both statins are well tolerated with safety profiles similar to other members of the statin class.

Adult↗
PubMed2003

Comparison of once-daily, niacin extended-release/lovastatin with standard doses of atorvastatin and simvastatin (the ADvicor Versus Other Cholesterol-Modulating Agents Trial Evaluation [ADVOCATE]).

This study compared the relative efficacy of a once-daily niacin extended-release (ER)/lovastatin fixed-dose combination with standard doses of atorvastatin or simvastatin, with a special emphasis on relative starting doses. Subjects (n = 315) with elevated low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol and decreased high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol blood levels (defined as LDL cholesterol blood levels > or =160 mg/dl without coronary artery disease, or > or =130 mg/dl if coronary artery disease was present, and HDL cholesterol <45 mg/dl in men and <50 mg/dl in women) were randomized to atorvastatin, simvastatin, or niacin ER/lovastatin for 16 weeks. The primary efficacy variables were the mean percent change in LDL cholesterol and HDL cholesterol levels from baseline. After 8 weeks, the starting dose niacin ER/lovastatin 1,000/40 mg and the 10-mg starting dose atorvastatin both lowered mean LDL cholesterol by 38%. After 12 weeks, niacin ER/lovastatin 1,000/40 mg lowered LDL cholesterol by 42% versus 34% with the 20-mg starting dose of simvastatin (p <0.001). Niacin ER/lovastatin increased HDL cholesterol significantly more than atorvastatin or simvastatin at all compared doses (p <0.001). Niacin ER/lovastatin also provided significant improvements in triglycerides, lipoprotein(a), apolipoprotein A-1, apolipoprotein B, and HDL subfractions. A total of 6% of study subjects receiving niacin ER/lovastatin withdrew because of flushing. No significant differences were seen among study groups in discontinuance due to elevated liver enzymes. No drug-induced myopathy was observed. Niacin ER/lovastatin was comparable to atorvastatin 10 mg and more effective than simvastatin 20 mg in reducing LDL cholesterol, was more effective in increasing HDL cholesterol than either atorvastatin or simvastatin, and provided greater global improvements in non-HDL cholesterol, triglycerides, and lipoprotein(a).

Adolescent↗
PubMed1999

Efficacy and safety of simvastatin for high-risk hypercholesterolemia.

Ten years' experience of treatment with the 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A reductase inhibitor simvastatin in 45 hypercholesterolemic high-risk patients is reported. All patients started with 20 mg simvastatin/day. The simvastatin dose was increased to 40 mg in 22 patients. Fourteen patients needed further addition of cholestyramine. Simvastatin reduced plasma cholesterol by 33% after 1 month and was further reduced after adjustment of the lipid-lowering treatment. The mean reduction in plasma cholesterol varied between 30% and 35% in 2 to 10 years. Low-density lipoprotein cholesterol demonstrated mean reductions of 34% to 42%. Mean plasma triglycerides were reduced by 26% after 1 month and by 1% to 19% the following years. High-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol increased initially by 8% and remained elevated at 7% to 11% during the first 6 years, but then dropped slightly below baseline. HDL2 cholesterol increased by 9% to 25% the first 6 years and then decreased. HDL3 cholesterol showed a persistent elevation during simvastatin treatment. About half of the subjects had minor transient but clinical insignificant increases in creatine kinase. No cases of myopathy were seen. Mean serum aspartate aminotransferase and alanine aminotransferase increased significantly but within the normal ranges during the 10 years. The tolerability and compliance of simvastatin treatment was excellent as judged from patients' reports and from analyses of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol. This 10-year study demonstrates that simvastatin is an effective and safe drug with excellent tolerability with only few minor side effects, and causes a pronounced and persistent cholesterol-lowering effect during long-term treatment of hypercholesterolemic patients at risk.

Alanine Transaminase↗
PubMed1999

Concomitant use of cytochrome P450 3A4 inhibitors and simvastatin.

The long-term safety profile of simvastatin, established over 10 years of clinical use, is excellent. The principal adverse effect of all inhibitors of hydroxymethylglutarate co-enzyme A (HMG-CoA) reductase, myopathy, is infrequent. Simvastatin is a substrate for cytochrome P450 3A4 (CYP3A4). CYP3A4 inhibitors can elevate the plasma concentration of HMG-CoA reductase inhibitory activity derived from simvastatin. Clinical experience has shown that concomitant use of potent inhibitors of CYP3A4 increase the risk for myopathy. Evaluation of data from clinical trials and postmarketing surveillance allows assessment of whether concomitant use of weaker CYP3A4 inhibitors, as represented by calcium channel blockers, has any effect on the risk of myopathy. Cases of myopathy in long-term clinical megatrials and in analyses of postmarketing adverse event reports have been surveyed. In megatrials with simvastatin, the overall incidence of myopathy was 0.025%. The proportion of patients developing myopathy who were taking a calcium channel blocker with simvastatin (1 of 3) was similar to the proportion of patients taking a calcium channel blocker overall. Among marketed-use adverse event reports, concomitant medication with a potent CYP3A4 inhibitor was more frequent among reports of myopathy than among reports of nonmusculoskeletal adverse events. No excess use of calcium channel blockers among myopathy reports was observed. We conclude that the overall risk of myopathy during treatment with simvastatin is very low. Potent CYP3A4 inhibitors, especially cyclosporine, significantly increase the risk. There is no evidence that weaker CYP3A4 inhibitors such as calcium channel blockers increase the risk.

Adverse Drug Reaction Reporting Systems↗
PubMed1989

Efficacy and tolerability of simvastatin (MK-733).

The efficacy of simvastatin, a new inhibitor of cholesterol biosynthesis, was studied in patients with familial hypercholesterolemia. A mean reduction in low-density lipoprotein cholesterol of 38 percent was observed after eight weeks of treatment with 20 mg of simvastatin; a 42 percent reduction was seen after the next 16 weeks with 40 mg. There was no difference in response whether the drug was taken in one or two doses. In another study, simvastatin (40 mg per day) was compared with cholestyramine (8 to 16 g per day). After 12 weeks, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol was reduced 43 percent by simvastatin and 29 percent by cholestyramine. Combination therapy caused a reduction in low-density lipoprotein cholesterol of 54 percent. Simvastatin appeared also to be a potent hypolipidemic drug in 10 patients with familial dysbetalipoproteinemia. The drug was well tolerated. Adverse effects were primarily composed of increases in serum transaminases and creatine phosphokinase. No effects of simvastatin on the production of steroid hormones were observed.

Adrenal Cortex↗
PubMed2003

Simvastatin induces osteoblastic differentiation and inhibits adipocytic differentiation in mouse bone marrow stromal cells.

To clarify the mechanism of the stimulatory effect of statins on bone formation, we investigated the effect of simvastatin, a widely used statin, on osteoblastic and adipocytic differentiation in primary cultured mouse bone marrow stromal cells (BMSCs). Simvastatin treatment enhanced the expression level of mRNA for osteocalcin and protein for osteocalcin and osteopontin, and increased alkaline phosphatase activity significantly (p<0.05). After BMSCs were exposed to an adipocyte differentiation agonist, Oil Red O staining, fluorescence activated cell sorting, and decreased expression level of lipoprotein lipase mRNA showed that treatment with simvastatin significantly inhibits adipocytic differentiation compared to controls that did not receive simvastatin (p<0.05). Lastly, we found that simvastatin induces high expression of BMP(2) in BMSCs. These observations suggested that simvastatin acts on BMSCs to enhance osteoblastic differentiation and inhibits adipocytic differentiation; this effect is at least partially mediated by inducing BMP(2) expression in BMSCs.

Adipocytes↗
PubMed1996

Action of lovastatin, simvastatin, and pravastatin on sterol synthesis and their antiproliferative effect in cultured myoblasts from human striated muscle.

Lovastatin, simvastatin, and pravastatin are fairly strong inhibitors of sterol synthesis in human myoblasts in culture. Lovastatin and simvastatin have IC50 values of 19 +/- 6 nM and 4.0 +/- 2.3 nM, respectively. Pravastatin is a weaker inhibitor of sterol synthesis (IC50 value of 110 +/- 38 nM). Through inhibition of mevalonate production, these compounds have a distinct inhibiting effect on cell proliferation. Because proliferation of myoblasts is important in the repair of damaged skeletal muscle, experiments were performed to investigate the effect of lovastatin, simvastatin, and pravastatin on cell proliferation and cell viability. The more potent inhibitors of sterol synthesis, lovastatin, and simvastatin, were able to inhibit the proliferation of these cells during 3 days of incubation with drug concentrations of 1 microM for lovastatin and 0.1 microM or 1 microM for simvastatin. DNA synthesis was decreased by more than 80% in the presence of 1 microM of lovastatin or simvastatin. In contrast, under these conditions, pravastatin had no influence on cell proliferation or DNA synthesis, which is probably related to the lack of inhibition of sterol synthesis by pravastatin on extended incubation. The three 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A reductase inhibitors did not disturb cell viability because mitochondrial dehydrogenase activity and ATP content remained proportional to the number of cells in the culture at any concentration used.

Acetic Acid↗
PubMed2001

Changes in lipid metabolism and effect of simvastatin in renal transplant recipients induced by cyclosporine or tacrolimus.

Hyperlipidemia is frequently developed following renal transplantation and results in worsening of the patient's prognosis. In study 1, the effects of immunosuppressants, cyclosporine (CsA) and tacrolimus on serum lipids were compared in-patients undergoing renal transplantation. The study included 32 cases of renal transplantation recipients who randomized to the CsA treatment group (15 patients) and the tacrolimus group (17 patients). Before and 1 month after the transplantation, we assessed the serum lipid levels, apolipoprotein levels, the concentrations of cholesterol in the respective lipoprotein fractions and the enzyme activities related to lipid-metabolism. The serum lipid levels in both groups were significantly increased at 1 month after renal transplantation. In the CsA group, there were significant increases in cholesterol contents in very-low-density lipoprotein (VLDL), LDL2 and HDL2 fractions, whereas, in the tacrolimus group, cholesterol content was increased in VLDL and HDL2 fractions. In study 2, 1 month after renal transplantation, 19 patients with hypercholesterolemia (total cholesterol (TC) >200 mg/dl) and hypertriglyceridemia (triglyceride (TG) >150 mg/dl) were treated with simvastatin 5-10 mg/day for 6 months. Simvastatin treatment significantly decreased serum TC (240+/-29-200+/-22 mg/dl, P<0.001), low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C; 114+/-20-99+/-17 mg/dl, P<0.05) and TG levels (217+/-103-130+/-38 mg/dl, P<0.01). In addition, there were significant decreases in very-low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (VLDL-C; 53+/-20-34+/-15 mg/dl, P<0.001). The Cmax and AUC of simvastatin were increased about eight-fold, when simvastatin was given in combination with CsA. In contrast, no significant changes in simvastatin levels were observed when combination with tacrolimus. Although simvastatin levels were increased with CsA, there were no abnormal changes in renal and liver functions, creatinine phosphokinase (CPK) levels or in incidence of adverse effects.

Adult↗
PubMed2002

Influence of LDL receptor gene mutation and apo E polymorphism on lipoprotein response to simvastatin treatment among adolescents with heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia.

The efficacy of the inhibitors of HMG CoA reductase shows considerable interindividual variation and intense research has focused in the recent years to identify the genetic loci and environmental factors responsible for this variability. A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial with simvastatin, an HMG CoA reductase inhibitor, was conducted in 63 adolescents (47 treated versus 17 controls) with heterozygous FH. The patients were grouped according to known low-density lipoprotein (LDL) receptor gene mutation class. After 6 weeks of treatment with 20 mg/d of simvastatin, the mean reduction in plasma LDL-cholesterol in patients with a receptor-negative mutation (n=33) was 39% whereas, in the receptor-defective mutation group (n=14), it was 31% (P=0.01). Multiple regression analyses showed that there was a significant association between the apo E polymorphism and LDL-cholesterol response to simvastatin only among heterozygotes for a receptor-negative mutation. In subjects carrying a receptor-defective mutation, however, we observed that 51% of the variability in LDL-cholesterol response was explained by variations in the dosage of simvastatin expressed in mg/kg/day (P=0.0028). There was no significant association between LDL-cholesterol response and the dosage of simvastatin among heterozygotes for a receptor-negative mutation. The results of the present study have shown that the contribution of apo E polymorphism and the dosage of simvastatin to the LDL-cholesterol responsiveness is influenced by the nature of the LDL receptor gene mutation.

Adolescent↗