Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “RADIODERMATITIS”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 397 records · Page 22Linked to original sources

Radiation-induced temporary hair loss as a radiation damage only occurring in patients who had the combination of MDCT and DSA.

As imaging technologies become increasingly advanced, it is possible to obtain detailed morphological information as well as functional imaging data. In some imaging technologies, the radiation dose increases with the ability to obtain better images or more detailed information. We encountered three cases of temporary bandage-shaped hair loss, which was caused by perfusion studies of the head by multi-detector row computed tomography (MDCT) for evaluation of cerebral blood flow in patients with vascular disorders. In all three patients with temporary hair loss, two angiographies of the head had been performed in the period of serial CT examinations. This suggested the possibility that radiation exposure from angiography performed in serial examinations, combined with the perfusion studies of the head with MDCT, played an important role in this temporary, bandage-shaped hair loss. Radiologists should be aware that a cumulative or multiplier effect of radiation exposure from multiple diagnostic techniques may result in hair loss and other types of radiation complications.

Adult↗

The prevention and management of acute skin reactions related to radiation therapy: a systematic review and practice guideline.

GOALS OF WORK: To develop a practice guideline report on the questions: What are the optimal methods to prevent acute skin reactions (occurring within the first 6 months of irradiation) related to radiation therapy? What are the optimal methods to manage acute skin reactions related to radiation therapy? MATERIALS AND METHODS: Cancer Care Ontario's Supportive Care Guidelines Group (SCGG) conducted a systematic review of literature on this topic. Evidence-based recommendations were formulated to guide clinical decision making, and a formal external review process was conducted to validate the relevance of these opinions for Ontario practitioners. MAIN RESULTS: Twenty-eight trials meeting the inclusion criteria were identified. Of the twenty-three trials that evaluated preventative methods, washing was the only practice which significantly prevented skin reaction. Some evidence suggested topical steroid creams and calendula ointment might be effective. None of the five trials evaluating skin reaction management detected a positive effect using steroid cream, sucralfate cream, or dressings. CONCLUSIONS: Skin washing, including gentle washing with water alone with or without mild soap, should be permitted in patients receiving radiation therapy to prevent acute skin reaction. There is insufficient evidence to support or refute specific topical or oral agents for the prevention or management of acute skin reaction. In the expert opinion from the SCGG, the use of a plain, non-scented, lanolin-free hydrophilic cream may be helpful in preventing radiation skin reactions. In addition, a low dose (i.e., 1%) corticosteroid cream may be beneficial in the reduction of itching and irritation.

Acute Disease↗

Toxic epidermal necrolysis of the scalp following anticonvulsant use and cranial irradiation.

BACKGROUND: Toxic epidermal necrolysis (TEN) of the scalp is rare but it has been shown to occur in patients who had been given a combination of cranial radiation and anticonvulsant therapies. OBJECTIVE: We present a 62-year-old man who received cranial irradiation following craniotomy for glioblastoma multiforme. After he was prescribed the anticonvulsant phenytoin for postsurgical seizure prophylaxis, the patient developed TEN which began on the scalp before spreading to involve other parts of his body. Our second case was a 55-year-old woman who had been diagnosed with lung carcinoma with metastasis to the brain. She was treated with cranial irradiation and the anticonvulsant carbamazepine. TEN developed first on the scalp and then became generalized. CONCLUSIONS: While the combination of radiation and anticonvulsants leads to an increased risk of developing TEN, cranial irradiation appears to be the localizing factor in the development of TEN of the scalp.

Anticonvulsants↗

Histopathologic features seen with radiation recall or enhancement eruptions.

BACKGROUND: Although a radiation recall or enhancement eruption has been associated with a number of chemotherapeutic drugs, the histologic features have rarely been described. OBJECTIVE: Our goal was to define the histologic features of radiation recall and enhancement eruptions in order to better understand their pathogenesis. METHODS: We present ten patients on chemotherapeutic agents who developed erythematous maculopapular to psoriasiform eruptions often with associated follicular pustules. These eruptions occurred at the sites of prior or concurrent radiation therapy. RESULTS: The most common class of drugs inducing these reactions were antibiotic chemotherapeutic agents alone or in combination with other chemotherapeutic drugs. In addition to routine histology, in four patients immunohistochemical staining for p53 was performed at the sites of the eruptions after resolution and at noninvolved sites matched for ultraviolet radiation (UVR) exposure. Histologic features in patients receiving concurrent radiation therapy included epidermal dysplasia, keratinocytes showing features of necrosis, increased mitotic figures, and a mixed inflammatory infiltrate. At sites of prior radiation therapy, the biopsy specimens showed a similar spectrum of epidermal changes and, in some cases, psoriasiform dermatitis with clearing within cells in the upper layers of the epidermis. Additional dermal changes included dermal fibrosis, vasodilatation, and atypical fibroblasts. Moderate to marked solar elastosis was seen in the majority of biopsy specimens. Immunohistochemical studies after resolution showed only a modest increase in p53 staining in epidermal keratinocytes in 3 of 4 sites of recall and enhancement eruptions after resolution of the reactions compared to skin that was matched for similar UVR exposure. CONCLUSION: Cumulative direct DNA damage and oxidative stress are probably important in radiation recall and enhancement eruptions, and these changes may be modulated by underlying nutritional deficits. Cumulative p53 mutations may play some role but are probably not a major factor in these eruptions. Mitochondrial dysfunction, which is known to occur with prior and concurrent radiation and chemotherapy, may be important in these eruptions. In addition to improvements in general nutrition, topical or oral antioxidant therapy may be a potential therapy to avoid radiation enhancement and recall reactions

Adult↗

Association between TP53 and p21 genetic polymorphisms and acute side effects of radiotherapy in breast cancer patients.

p53 and p21 play an important role in G1/S checkpoint control in response to ionizing radiation. Yet the genetic polymorphisms in these genes have not been investigated with respect to radiation toxicity in patients. We therefore assessed the association between TP53 Arg72Pro, p53PIN3 and p21 Ser31Arg polymorphisms and the risk of acute skin toxicity after radiotherapy in a prospective study of 446 female breast cancer patients (average age 60.3+/-9.0 years) receiving radiotherapy after breast conserving surgery. The p53PIN3 polymorphism was determined by standard PCR, and TP53 Arg72Pro and p21 Ser31Arg polymorphisms using melting point analysis of sequence-specific hybridization probes. The development of acute skin toxicity (moist desquamation) was modelled using Cox proportional hazards, accounting for cumulative biologically effective radiation dose. Overall, the development of acute skin toxicity, which presented in 77 patients, was not significantly associated with the polymorphisms studied. Risks were however differential by body mass index. Compared to non-carriers, TP53 72Pro carriers had a non-significantly decreased risk of acute skin toxicity in normal weight women (hazard ratio 0.46, 95% CI, 0.18-1.18) but not in overweight patients (hazard ratio 1.07, 95% CI, 0.61-1.89) (p(interaction) =0.14). Haplotype analysis for the TP53 polymorphisms suggested that effect modification by TP53 72Pro may differ according to the p53PIN3 allele (p(interaction)=0.06). Furthermore, in TP53 72Pro carriers with p21 Ser/Ser genotype, the occurrence of acute toxicity was reduced in normal weight but not overweight patients. In conclusion, the TP53 72Pro variant may be associated with the development of acute skin toxicity after radiotherapy in patients with normal weight. Large clinical studies are needed to clearly confirm this association.

Arginine↗

Radiation risk management during fluoroscopy for interventional pain medicine physicians.

Because of serious radiographic-induced skin injuries that may have been caused by the inappropriate use of fluoroscopy during the performance of radiograph-guided invasive procedures, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) issued an advisory in 1994 suggesting that the key to preventing such unfortunate mishaps may be physician education, training, and credentialing in the safe operation of fluoroscopic equipment. The purpose of this article is to familiarize the interventional pain medicine physician with the physics of ionizing radiation and how to limit patient exposure through the optimum setting of tube current and voltage, the use of limited beam-on time, tight collimation, and the elimination of the nonessential use of the magnification mode on a fluoroscopy unit. In addition, the use of personal protection equipment and the knowledge needed to interpret the personal exposure record of each practitioner is discussed. All of this information will assist the interventional pain medicine physician in meeting the recommended FDA training and credentialing requirements.

Fluoroscopy↗

Repair of large chest wall defects using pedicle flaps.

Three cases of chest wall resection illustrate the use of three different full thickness pedicle flaps which can be used to cover almost any area of the anterior chest wall. The medially based acromiothoracic flap was swung inferiorly to cover a lateral defect. Laterally based abdominal wall and axillary flaps were used to cover more medial defects. In case III bilateral axillary flaps were necessary to cover a huge central defect after resection of the anterior sternum and anterior cartilages of seven ribs for a sebaceous carcinoma.

Aged↗

Concomitant hydroxyurea and irradiation. Clinical experience with 100 patients with advanced head and neck cancer at Pennsylvania hospital.

One hundred outpatients with proved advanced epidermoid carcinoma of the head and neck underwent complete treatment with concomitant hydroxyurea and irradiation therapy. Seventy-three patients exhibited complete regression of the tumor. All patients became candidates for operation after completion of combination therapy, although not all patients accepted surgery.

Carcinoma, Squamous Cell↗

Accidental overirradiation syndrome.

Between the 10th and 20th December 1990, there was a malfunction in the operation of the Electron Linear Accelerator (ELA) at the Hospital Clínico Universitario in Zaragoza (Spain), which led to irradiation with the highest beam energy. This situation shows the existence of a latent period between the irradiation and the appearance of the symptoms, even in situations involving much higher than normal doses in cases of localized irradiation.

Accidents↗

Possible leakage radiation during malfunctioning of a Sagittaire accelerator.

A non-fatal accident with a CGR-Sagittaire accelerator in the Dr Daniel den Hoed Cancer Center (DDHCC) in Rotterdam in 1988 is described. In a period with frequently occurring technical problems, a patient, undergoing fractionated treatment at this accelerator for prostatic cancer, developed severe skin reactions on the right half ventral part of thorax, head and upper arm. The skin reactions suggested an irradiation with a dose of up to 10-20 Gy, so it was likely that a radiation accident had occurred caused by leakage radiation. A number of experiments were performed in attempting to explain the estimated large dose rates of leakage radiation. Under rather extreme malfunctioning conditions, a high leakage dose rate (4 Gy/min) could be obtained during therapy use. This condition might have occurred during this period of technical difficulty.

Accidents↗