Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Motion Perception”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 397 records · Page 22Linked to original sources
PubMed1996

How similar must the Fourier spectra of the frames of a random-dot kinematogram be to support motion perception?

Direction-discrimination performance was measured for two-frame random-dot kinematograms in which one or both frames were spatial frequency filtered with a one octave band-pass filter and the centre frequency of this filter was varied in the range 0.75-9 c/deg independently for each frame. When both frames were filtered so that they contained common (overlapping) spatial frequencies direction discrimination was extremely good but it deteriorated rapidly as the degree of spectral overlap between the two frames decreased. These results are consistent with previous findings that suggest that the mechanisms that mediate the initial stages of motion detection are narrowly tuned for spatial frequency and cannot combine information conveyed at disparate frequencies in order to compute an unambiguous estimate of the direction of local motion. However, when only one of the frames was band-pass filtered and the other was unfiltered (broadband), the correct direction of stimulus motion could be discriminated reliably for a broad range of filter centre frequencies. Performance was best when the centre frequency of the filtered frame was at medium spatial frequencies and tended to deteriorate as the centre frequency approached either extreme of the spatial frequency range examined. This basic pattern of results may be attributed to the visual system's differential sensitivity to the Fourier components present in the unfiltered frame.

Discrimination, Psychological↗
PubMed1991

The relationship of luminous intensity and velocity for motion perception and maximum OKN elicitation.

The psychophysiological aspects of the luminous intensity stimulus velocity relationship for perceiving a grating pattern and eliciting optokinetic nystagmus (OKN) with maximum slow-phase velocity were studied in two normal human eyes. The results show that (1) both the luminous intensity and target velocity (within the region from 16-56 deg/sec) have a linear relation to the perception of a grating pattern and eliciting of the maximum OKN. (2) The trends of the relation between perception and elicitation are similar, but the slopes of the regression lines are different. (3) No statistically valid directional effect is found on either visual perception or maximum OKN elicitation in humans who have normal binocular vision. (4) For a given stimulus velocity, OKN gain (slow-phase velocity/stimulus velocity) increases to a saturation point as the stimulus intensity increases. The maximum OKN gain decreases as the stimulus velocity increases.

Humans↗
PubMed1996

[Measuring vernier acuity and motion perception with the parameter sweep VEP].

BACKGROUND: The visual abilities of infants and small children, who are unable to communicate verbally, can be determined with "objective" visual acuity tests as, e.g., preferential looking (PL) or visual evoked potentials (VEP). Both methods provide an estimate of grating visual acuity, but are unable to determine optotype visual acuity. Grating acuity, however, is not an optimum indicator for visual performance, as it is less affected than optotype acuity by pathological changes. The diagnostic relevance of objective methods may be improved by testing visual functions that are more strongly degraded by a malfunction of the fovea than is grating acuity. Visual functions such as vernier acuity and relative motion sensitivity are potential candidates. METHODS: Characteristic properties of vernier- and motion-VEP have been determined on adult subjects with a rapid-sweep-technique at various eccentricities. RESULTS: Both vernier and motion stimuli elicited VEP-responses at the 2nd harmonic (F2) of the stimulus frequency. A VEP-response at the fundamental frequency (F1) could be recorded with the vernier stimulus only. Foveal VEP-thresholds were very similar to psychophysical thresholds lying in the range from 11 to 25 arcsecs. The eccentricity dependence of the VEP-threshold recorded with vernier- and motion stimuli shows different cortical magnifications and supports the notion that the F1 response is related to the detection of the vernier offset, whereas the F2 response is generated by motion components of the stimuli. CONCLUSIONS: Vernier and relative motion-related VEP thresholds can be recorded with the steady-state VEP. They may provide more sensitive tests of foveal vision loss than grating visual acuity tests.

Attention↗
PubMed1988

Left-right visual field asymmetry in bistable motion perception.

Twelve observers viewed two alternating frames, each consisting of three rectangular bars which were displaced laterally by one cycle in one frame with respect to the other. At long interframe intervals (IFIs) observers perceived a group of three elements moving as a whole (group movement), whereas with IFIs shorter than 40-60 ms the overlapping elements in each frame appeared stationary while the third element appeared to move from one end of the display to the other (end-to-end movement). The percentage of group movement responses in central viewing was compared to those obtained for stimulus presentation in the left and right visual fields (4 deg eccentricity), for opposite horizontal directions of motion. All ten right-handed subjects showed a left-field advantage in sensitivity to group movement. The two left-handed subjects showed a similar advantage in sensitivity with right-field presentation. The effects of monocular vision, hand used in the task, spatial frequency, and contrast on visual field asymmetry were all investigated in two right-handed subjects. None of these factors affected the left-right asymmetry.

Cerebral Cortex↗
PubMed1972

Motion perception: a color-contingent aftereffect.

When observers who watched repeated alternations of a red contracting spiral and green expanding spiral were later shown stationary spirals, red and a green the red stationary spiral appeared to be expanding and the green stationary spiral appeared to be contracting. These color-contingent motion after effects complement reports of motion-contingent color aftereffects and suggest that both may reflect adaptation of detectors specific to color and motion.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2005

Speed can go up as well as down at low contrast: implications for models of motion perception.

It is well-known that reducing the contrast of a slow moving stimulus reduces its apparent speed. [Thompson, P. (1982). Perceived rate of movement depends on contrast. Vision Research, 22, 377-380.] report of this finding also suggested that at speeds above 8 cycles/s reducing contrast increased perceived speed. However in a later report, Stone and Thompson (1992), using a more rigorous, forced-choice procedure, failed to collect reliable data at these higher speeds. Here, we confirm that faster moving stimuli can appear to move faster than their true speed at low contrasts and we propose a physiologically plausible ratio model that unlike recent Bayesian models (e.g. Weiss, Y., Simoncelli, E. P., & Adelson, E. H. (2002). Motion illusions as optimal percepts. Nature Neuroscience, 5, 598-604) can account well for the results.

Bayes Theorem↗
PubMed2006

Influence of visual motion on tactile motion perception.

Subjects were presented with pairs of tactile drifting sinusoids and made speed discrimination judgments. On some trials, a visual drifting sinusoid, which subjects were instructed to ignore, was presented simultaneously with one of the two tactile stimuli. When the visual and tactile gratings drifted in the same direction (i.e., from left to right), the visual distractors were found to increase the perceived speed of the tactile gratings. The effect of the visual distractors was proportional to their temporal frequency but not to their perceived speed. When the visual and tactile gratings drifted in opposite directions, the distracting effect of the visual distractors was either substantially reduced or, in some cases, reversed (i.e., the distractors slowed the perceived speed of the tactile gratings). This result suggests that the observed visual-tactile interaction is dependent on motion and not simply on the oscillations inherent in drifting sinusoids. Finally, we find that disrupting the temporal synchrony between the visual and tactile stimuli eliminates the distracting effect of the visual stimulus. We interpret this latter finding as evidence that the observed visual-tactile interaction operates at the sensory level and does not simply reflect a response bias.

Female↗
PubMed2005

Vestibulo-tactile interactions regarding motion perception and eye movements in yaw.

This paper shows that tactile stimulation can override vestibular information regarding spinning sensations and eye movements. However, we conclude that the current data do not support the hypothesis that tactile stimulation controls eye movements directly. To this end, twenty-four subjects were passively disoriented by an abrupt stop after an increase in yaw velocity, about an Earth vertical axis, up to 120 degrees /s. Immediately thereafter, they had to actively maintain a stationary position despite a disturbance signal. Subjects wore a tactile display vest with 48 miniature vibrators, applied in different combinations with visual and vestibular stimuli. Their performance was quantified by RMS body velocity during self-control. Fast eye movement phases were analyzed by counting samples exceeding a velocity limit, slow phases by a novel method applying a first order model. Without tactile and visual information, subjects returned to a previous level of angular motion. Tactile stimulation decreased RMS self velocity considerably, though less than vision. No differences were observed between conditions in which the vest was active during the recovery phase only or during the disorienting phase as well. All effects of tactile stimulation found on the eye movement parameters could be explained by the vestibular stimulus.

Adult↗
PubMed1993

The neuronal basis of motion perception.

The central nervous system of humans supports a range of cognitive functions that contribute to conscious mental states. The neural systems underlying several of these cognitive functions, including perception, memory, planning and action, are proving susceptible to experimental analysis in lower primate species such as rhesus monkeys. In particular, recent investigations have generated striking new insights concerning the neural mechanisms that mediate visual perception. We briefly review the functional organization of the primate visual pathways and describe new experiments that demonstrate a causal link between neural activity in one of these pathways and a specific aspect of perceptual performance. The experiments illustrate an incisive method for linking perceptual abilities to their neural substrates. This approach may prove applicable to the analysis of other cognitive functions as well.

Animals↗
PubMed2001

Features derived from first-order motion mechanisms predict anomalies in motion perception.

Current dominant hypotheses of how humans detect the movement of patterns assume that the pattern is divided into one-dimensional sinusoidally varying luminance patterns, referred to as gratings (first-order components). The speed of these gratings is independently encoded from predominantly spatial and temporal frequency information, and their direction is encoded from orientation information. This paper addresses the problem of how the individually encoded grating information is combined to give perceived pattern direction, given that real moving objects are generally made up of more than one component. More specifically, further evidence is presented for a combination based on the use of a feature derived from first-order components--'first-order feature hypothesis'. This hypothesis essentially implements a constraint on pattern direction called the intersection of constraints (IOC) proposed by Adelson and Movshon [1982, Nature 300 523-525]. A simulation of the model is used to make three new predictions about a perceived motion reversal reported by Derrington et al (1992, Vision Research 32 699-707); these predictions are tested and found to be consistent with the first-order feature hypothesis.

Computer Simulation↗
PubMed1999

Motion transparency: making models of motion perception transparent.

In daily life our visual system is bombarded with motion information. We see cars driving by, flocks of birds flying in the sky, clouds passing behind trees that are dancing in the wind. Vision science has a good understanding of the first stage of visual motion processing, that is, the mechanism underlying the detection of local motions. Currently, research is focused on the processes that occur beyond the first stage. At this level, local motions have to be integrated to form objects, define the boundaries between them, construct surfaces and so on. An interesting, if complicated case is known as motion transparency: the situation in which two overlapping surfaces move transparently over each other. In that case two motions have to be assigned to the same retinal location. Several researchers have tried to solve this problem from a computational point of view, using physiological and psychophysical results as a guideline. We will discuss two models: one uses the traditional idea known as 'filter selection' and the other a relatively new approach based on Bayesian inference. Predictions from these models are compared with our own visual behaviour and that of the neural substrates that are presumed to underlie these perceptions.

Journal Article↗
PubMed2000

Neural correlates of reafference: evoked brain activity during motion perception and saccadic eye movements.

The ability to perceive a stable visual environment despite eye movements and the resulting displacement of the retinal image is a striking feature of visual perception. In order to study the brain mechanism related to this phenomenon, an EEG was recorded from 30 electrodes spaced over the occipital, temporal and parietal brain areas while stationary or moving visual stimuli with velocities between 178 degrees/s and 533 degrees/s were presented. The visual stimuli were presented both during saccadic eye movements and with stationary eyes. Stimulus-related potentials were measured, and the effects of absolute and relative stimulus velocity were analyzed. Healthy adults participated in the experiments. In all 36 subjects and experimental conditions, four potential components were found with mean latencies of about 70, 140, 220 and 380 ms. The latency of the two largest components between 100 and 240 ms decreased while field strength increased with higher absolute stimulus velocity for both stationary and moving eyes, whereas relative stimulus velocity had no effect on amplitude, latency and topography of the visual evoked potential (VEP) components. If the visual system uses retinal motion information only, we would expect a dependence upon relative velocity. Since field strength and latency of the components were independent of eye movements but dependent upon absolute stimulus velocity, the visual cortex must use extraretinal information to extract stimulus velocity. This was confirmed by the fact that significant topographic changes were observed when brain activity evoked during saccades and with stationary eyes was compared. In agreement with the reafference principle, the findings indicate that the same absolute visual stimulus activates different neuronal elements during saccades than during fixation.

Adult↗
PubMed1981

Nystagmus, gaze shift, and self-motion perception during sinusoidal head and neck rotation.

Report on eye movements and perceived horizontal head rotation in 26 healthy students during sinusoidal vestibular, visual, cervical, congruent vestibular-plus-visual, or vestibular-plus-cervical stimulation. Circularvection occurred more often during neck afferent than during full-field optokinetic stimuli. In contrast, the cervico-ocular response had a low average velocity. As first noted by Frenzel (1928), a greater gaze shift distinguished the normal cervical from the normal labyrinthine response. The cervico-ocular and vestibulo-ocular responses were found to add up. Clinically, the results imply that ocular movements may be a poor measure of dizziness in cervical syndromes.

Adult↗
PubMed1993

An oblique effect in parafoveal motion perception.

An observer's ability to discriminate the angular direction of a moving grating depends on the grating orientation. Observers can more accurately judge the angular direction of vertical or horizontal gratings than oblique gratings. We discovered that this oblique effect becomes very large at high spatial frequencies in the parafovea. Perceived direction was quantified with a direction matching task at spatial frequencies ranging from 7.6 to 22.6 c/deg. As spatial frequency increased, direction matches of oblique gratings deviated away from the diagonal and towards vertical or horizontal axes. Subjects reported that the higher spatial frequency gratings appeared as grainy noise, particularly at oblique orientations. Our results indicate that, in the parafovea, subjects perceive movement of high spatial frequencies mainly along principal meridians. One possible explanation for this effect is that the high frequency patterns are aliased by the irregular mosaic of parafoveal cones. The aliasing noise generated by irregular sampling contains spatial energy at all orientations, but perhaps only vertical and horizontal components of the noise are visible to the observer.

Adult↗
PubMed2006

Nonvisual motor training influences biological motion perception.

Experimental evidence suggests a link between perception and the execution of actions . In particular, it has been proposed that motor programs might directly influence visual action perception . According to this hypothesis, the acquisition of novel motor behaviors should improve their visual recognition, even in the absence of visual learning. We tested this prediction by using a new experimental paradigm that dissociates visual and motor learning during the acquisition of novel motor patterns. The visual recognition of gait patterns from point-light stimuli was assessed before and after nonvisual motor training. During this training, subjects were blindfolded and learned a novel coordinated upper-body movement based only on verbal and haptic feedback. The learned movement matched one of the visual test patterns. Despite the absence of visual stimulation during training, we observed a selective improvement of the visual recognition performance for the learned movement. Furthermore, visual recognition performance after training correlated strongly with the accuracy of the execution of the learned motor pattern. These results prove, for the first time, that motor learning has a direct and highly selective influence on visual action recognition that is not mediated by visual learning.

Humans↗
PubMed2001

Nonlinear contribution of eye velocity to motion perception.

The aim of this study was to test the hypothesis that an extra-retinal signal combines with retinal velocity in a linear manner as described by existing models to determine perceived velocity. To do so, we utilized a method that allowed the determination of the relative contributions of the retinal-velocity and the extra-retinal signals for the perception of stimulus velocity. We determined the velocity (speed and direction) of a stimulus viewed with stationary eyes that was perceptually the same as the velocity of the stimulus viewed with moving eyes. Eye movements were governed by the tracking (or pursuit) of a separate pursuit target. The velocity-matching data were unable to be fit with a model that linearly combined a retinal-velocity signal and an extra-retinal signal. A model that was successful in explaining the data was one that takes the difference between two simple saturating non-linear functions, g and f, each symmetric about the origin, but one having an interaction term. That is, the function g has two arguments: retinal velocity, R, and eye velocity, E. The only argument to f is retinal velocity, R. Each argument has a scaling parameter. A comparison of the goodness of fits between models demonstrated that the success of the model is the interaction term, i.e. the modification of the compensating eye velocity signal by the retinal velocity prior to combination.

Analog-Digital Conversion↗
PubMed2002

Neck proprioception compensates for age-related deterioration of vestibular self-motion perception.

Vestibular functions are known to show some deterioration with age. Vestibular deterioration is often thought to be compensated for by an increase in neck proprioceptive gain. We studied this presumed compensatory mechanism by measuring psychophysical responses to vestibular (horizontal canal), neck and combined stimuli in 50 healthy human subjects as a function of age (range 15-76 years). After passive horizontal rotations of head and/or trunk (torso) in complete darkness (dominant frequencies 0.05, 0.1, and 0.4 Hz), subjects readjusted a visual target to its remembered prerotational location in space. (1) Vestibular-only stimulus(whole-body rotation); subjects' responses were shifted towards postrotatory body position, this only slightly at 0.4 Hz and pronounced at 0.1 and 0.05 Hz. These errors reflect the known physiological drop of vestibular gain at low rotational frequency. They exhibited a slight but significant increase with age. (2) Neck-only stimulus(trunk rotated, head stationary); the responses showed errors similar to those upon vestibular stimulation (with offset towards postrotatory trunk position) and this again slightly more with increasing age. (3) Vestibular-neck stimulus combinationduring head rotation on stationary trunk; the errors were close to zero, independent of stimulus frequency and the subjects' age. (4) Opposite stimulus combination(trunk rotated in the same direction as the head, but with double amplitude); the errors were clearly enhanced, essentially reflecting the sum of those with vestibular-only and neck-only stimulation. Taken together, we find a parallel increase in neck- and vestibular-related errors with age, in seeming contrast to previous studies. We explain our and the previous findings by a vestibular-neck interaction model in which two different neck signals are involved. One neck signal is used, in combination with the vestibular signal, for estimating trunk-in-space rotation. It is internally shaped to always match the vestibular signal, so that these two signals cancel each other out when summed during head rotation on stationary trunk. Because of this matching, perceived trunk stationariness during head rotation on the stationary trunk is independent of vestibular deterioration (related to stimulus frequency, age, ototoxic medication, etc.). The other neck proprioceptive signal, coding head-on-trunk rotation, is superimposed on the estimate of trunk-in-space rotation, thereby yielding a notion of head-in-space. This neck signal remains essentially unchanged with vestibular deterioration. Generally, we hold that the transformation of the vestibular signal from the head down to the trunk proceeds further to include the hip and the legs as well as the haptically perceived body support surface; by this, subjects yield a notion of support kinematics in space. As a consequence, spatial orientation is impaired by chronic vestibular deterioration only to the extent that the body support is moving in space, while it is unimpaired (determined by proprioception alone) during body motion with respect to a stationary support.

Adolescent↗