[Successful mitral valve replacement in a 13-month-old infant with parachute mitral valve presenting pure mitral stenosis].
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
SEARCH · Search PubMed
Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.
Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Replacement of the mitral valve through a standard vertical left atriotomy in patients requiring both aortic and mitral valve replacement can be very difficult. This is especially true in patients who have undergone previous median sternotomy. Replacement of the mitral valve through the aortic root after excision of the aortic valve is described in two case reports. This is a convenient approach when traditional exposure of the mitral valve is impractical in patients requiring double valve replacement.
Eight patients with mixed mitral stenosis and regurgitation underwent hemodynamic and angiographic study prior to mitral valve replacement. The stenotic orifice of the mitral valve was calculated employing the total left ventricular stroke volume by cineangiography as the numerator of the Gorlin Formula. Excellent agreement with the measured orifice of the mitral valve was obtained using a value of 37.9 (0.85 X 44.5) for the constant in the Gorlin formula as recommended by Cohen and Gorlin. Recalculation of this constant independently by our data yielded a value that was almost identical. Regurgitant flows and orifice sizes were calculated for each patient using the same constant as for calculation of the stenotic orifices.
A women who developed mitral stenosis from Libman-Sacks endocarditis is described. The mitral valve was replaced by a Starr-Edwards prosthesis. One year later, despite her being maintained on steroids and azathioprine, the verrucous endocarditis progressed to cause sudden, severe dysfunction of the prosthetic valve.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
OBJECTIVES: We attempted to determine the most suitable aliasing velocity for applying the hemispheric flow convergence equation to calculate the mitral valve area in mitral stenosis using a continuity equation. BACKGROUND: The flow convergence region method has been used for calculating mitral valve area in patients with mitral stenosis. However, the effect of varying aliasing velocity on the accuracy of this method has not been investigated fully. METHODS: We studied 42 patients with mitral stenosis using imaging and Doppler echocardiography. Aliasing velocities of 17, 21, 28, 34, 40 and 45 cm/s were used. The transmitral maximal flow rate (Q [ml/s]) was calculated using the hemispheric flow convergence equation Q = 2 x pi x R2 x AV x alpha/180, where R (cm) is the maximal radius of the flow convergence region, AV is the aliasing velocity, and alpha/180 is a factor accounting for the inflow angle (alpha). Mitral valve area (A [cm2]) was calculated according to the continuity equation A = Q/V, where V (cm/s) is the peak transmitral velocity by the continuous wave Doppler method. RESULTS: Mitral valve area was progressively underestimated with increasing aliasing velocity. The actual and percent differences noted between the mitral valve area by the flow convergence region method and that by two-dimensional echocardiographic planimetry were -0.06 +/- 0.23 cm2 (mean +/- SD) and 0.09 +/- 15.7% at an aliasing velocity of 21 cm/s, increasing gradually with increasing aliasing velocity, and were -1.24 +/- 0.9 cm2 and -72.56 +/- 16.4% at an aliasing velocity of 45 cm/s. Mitral valve areas estimated by the flow convergence region method at an aliasing velocity of 21 cm/s in 11 patients with associated > 2+ mitral regurgitation (2.12 +/- 1.17 cm2) and 8 with associated > 2+ aortic regurgitation (1.28 +/- 0.71 cm2) were not significantly different using planimetry (2.24 +/- 1.39 cm2, p > 0.05 and 1.27 +/- 0.74 cm2, p > 0.05, respectively) but were significantly different by the pressure half-time method (1.59 +/- 1.12 cm2, p < 0.001 and 1.63 +/- 0.93 cm2, p < 0.01, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: This study indicated the most appropriate aliasing velocity for the accurate estimation of mitral valve area in patients with mitral stenosis.
BACKGROUND: Intraoperative transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) using color Doppler flow mapping can accurately measure residual mitral regurgitation (MR), but it is unknown to what extent such measurements correlate with those obtained with postoperative transthoracic echocardiography (TTE). METHODS: We used intraoperative TEE (based on direct planimetry of the maximal regurgitant jet area) to measure residual MR in 42 patients who underwent mitral valve reconstruction for MR and compared these measurements with those obtained with early and late postoperative TTE. RESULTS: Residual MR as measured by intraoperative TEE correlated significantly with values obtained with both early (r = 0.66; p < 0.0001) and late (r = 0.71; p < 0.0001) postoperative TTE. Forty patients with no or trivial MR (< or =2 cm2) as measured by intraoperative TEE also had no or trivial MR as measured by early (probability of 87.5%) and late (probability of 80.0%) postoperative TEE. Of the 40 patients, 6 had clinically insignificant mild MR (< or =4 cm2) when measured by late postoperative TTE. Two other patients in whom intraoperative TEE showed mild MR developed moderate regurgitation about 3 months later. CONCLUSIONS: Intraoperative TEE correlates with early and late postoperative TTE in measurement of residual MR, suggesting it can reliably predict early and late postoperative mitral valve dysfunction.
Mitral valve prolapse is now the most common cardiac diagnosis of childhood. The auscultatory findings of a non-ejection click with or without an associated murmur of mitral insufficiency are reviewed and related to the pathologic and histologic abnormalities. Findings at presentation in a large series of patients are given. Potential problems with progressive mitral insufficiency, arrhythmias and bacterial endocarditis are reviewed. This overview attempts to establish the essentially benign nature of mitral valve prolapse in childhood while indicating areas where continued observation is necessary.
Pulmonary hypertension frequently complicates mitral stenosis. Increased pulmonary artery pressure results from raised left atrial pressure, pulmonary arteriolar constriction, and obliterative changes in the pulmonary vascular bed, and usually responds to surgical relief of mitral stenosis. However, severe pulmonary hypertension may persist after surgical treatment of mitral stenosis. We describe a patient whose severe pulmonary hypertension following mitral valve replacement was treated successfully with continuous intravenous epoprostenol.
The prevalence of aortic valve and mitral valve or mitral annular calcification by echocardiography was studied in 66 dialysis patients and correlated with results of 24-h ambulatory and resting ECG data and 12-month survival. The well-known association of mitral valve or mitral annular calcification with cardiac conduction defects was confirmed. Those patients with mitral valve or mitral annular calcification demonstrated a higher prevalence of first-degree atrioventricular block and bundle branch block. Despite advanced age and these conduction defects, those patients with mitral valvular calcification did not show decreased survival at 12 months.
Mitral regurgitation (MR) associated with, ischemic, and degenerative (prolapse) disease, contributes to left ventricular (LV) dysfunction due to remodeling, and LV dilation, resulting in worsening of MR. Mitral valve (MV) surgical repair has provided improvement in survival, LV function and symptoms, especially when performed early. Surgical repair is complex, due to diverse etiologies and has significant complications. The Society for Thoracic Surgery database shows that operative mortality for a 1st repair is 2% and for re-do repair is 4 times that. Cardiopulmonary bypass and cardiac arrest are required. The attendant morbidity prolongs hospitalization and recovery. Alfieri simplified mitral repair using an edge-to-edge technique which subsequently has been shown to be effective for multiple etiologies of MR. The MV leaflers are typically brought together by a central suture producing a double orifice MV without stenosis. Umana reported that MR decreased from grade 3.6 +/- 0.5 to 0.8 +/- 0.4 (P < 0.0001) and LV ejection fraction increased from 33 +/- 13% to 45 +/- 11% (P = 0.0156). In 121 patients, Maisano reported freedom from re-operation of 95 +/- 4.8% with up to 6 year follow-up. Oz developed a MV "grasper" that is directly placed via a left ventriculotomy and coapts both leaflets which are then fastened by a graduated spiral screw. An in-vitro model using explanted human valves showed significant reduction in MR and in canine studies, animals followed by serial echo had persistent MV coaptation. At 12 weeks the device was endothelialized. These promising results have paved the way for a percutaneous or minimally invasive-off pump mitral repair. Evalve has developed catheter-based technology, which, by apposing the edges of a regurgitant MV, results in edge-to-edge repair. Release of the device is done after echo and fluoroscopic evaluation under normal loading conditions. If the desired effect is not produced the device can be repositioned or retrieved. Animal studies show excellent healing, with incorporation of the device into the leaflets at 6-10 weeks with persistent coaptation. Another percutaneous approach has been to utilize the proximity of the coronary sinus (CS) to the mitral annulus (MA). Placement of a self-compressing device in the CS along the region of the posterior MA has, in canine models, reduced MR and addresses the issues of MA dilation and its contribution to MR. Ongoing studies are underway for both techniques.
Allograft valves have been used in cardiac valve replacement for 35 years. During much of this time, certain centers have used allograft aortic valves for aortic valve replacement and have reported excellent long-term results. After an initial period of failure using allograft mitral valves for mitral valve replacement, the technical problems of papillary muscle dehiscence and mitral regurgitation appear minimized by current investigators who now report encouraging early results. The current status of allograft use for aortic and mitral valve replacement is reviewed.
Mitral valve prolapse, diagnosed by auscultation of typical midsystolic clicks and late systolic murmurs or by echocardiographic demonstration of definite systolic protrusion of the mitral leaflets into the left atrium, is the commonest human abnormality of heart valves, affecting roughly 4 per cent of the population. The most important clinical features of mitral valve prolapse include palpitations and small but definite risks of infective endocarditis or significant mitral regurgitation in middle age, or later. Current evidence suggests that mitral prolapse is due to an inherited abnormality in connective tissue, which causes thoracic bony abnormalities and reduced body weight and blood pressure, in addition to the changes in the mitral valve.
BACKGROUND: Mitral valve repair is considered better than mitral valve replacement for degenerative mitral regurgitation. AIM: To evaluate late clinical results of mitral valve repair as compared to mitral valve replacement in patients with degenerative mitral regurgitation. PATIENTS AND METHODS: All patients subjected to open heart surgery for degenerative mitral regurgitation between 1990 and 2002 were assessed for surgical mortality, late cardiac and overall mortality, reoperation, readmission to hospital, functional capacity and anticoagulant therapy. Eighty eight patients (48 males) had mitral valve repair and 28 (19 males) had mitral valve replacement (23 with a mechanical prosthesis). Mean age was 59.9 +/- 14.8 (SD) and 61.3 +/- 14.6 years, respectively. Sixty three percent of patients with repair and 50% of those with valve replacement were in functional class III or IV before surgery. RESULTS: Operative mortality was 2.3% for mitral valve repair and 3.6% for mitral valve replacement (NS). Also, there was no statistical difference in the need of reoperation during the follow-up period between both procedures (2.3% and 0%, respectively). Ninety four percent of the replacement patients but only 26% of the repair patients were in anticoagulant therapy at the end of the follow-up period (p < 0.001). Ten years survival rates were 82 +/- 6% for mitral valve repair and 54 +/- 11% for replacement. The corresponding cardiac related survival rates were 89 +/- 6% and 79 +/- 10%. At the end of follow-up, all surviving patients were in functional class I or II. Ten years freedom from cardiac event rates (death, cardiac related rehospitalization and reoperation) were 90 +/- 3% for mitral valve repair and 84 +/- 6% for replacement. CONCLUSION: Repair of the mitral valve offers a better overall survival and a better chance of freedom from cardiac events as well as need for anticoagulation 10 years after surgery.
Left ventricular diastolic function has been evaluated by means of analysis of the flow pattern through the mitral valve. Velocity-encoded cine magnetic resonance imaging (VEC-MR) is a new method for characterizing flow patterns in the heart. The feasibility of using VEC-MR to measure early diastolic (E) and atrial systolic (A) peak flow velocities and E/A ratios in the mitral inflow, as well as systolic (X), early diastolic (Y), and atrial systolic (Z) peak flow velocities and X/Y ratios in the pulmonary vein, was evaluated in 10 normal volunteers. The VEC-MR-derived velocities and indexes were compared with Doppler-derived results. Volumetric flow across the mitral valve was also used to measure stroke volume, cardiac output, and the left atrial contribution of left ventricular filling. VEC-MR yielded lower peak velocities than Doppler echocardiography. The velocities of the two measurements showed a significant linear correlation (Doppler E velocity = 1.30 x VEC-MR + 1.6 cm/sec, r = 0.68; Doppler A velocity = 1.83 x VEC-MR - 5.2 cm/sec, r = 0.83; and Doppler X velocity = 0.45 x VEC-MR + 0.09 cm/sec, r = 0.74). Consequently the E/A and X/Y ratios measured by these two methods showed statistically significant linear correlations with r values of 0.94 and 0.83. The volume of blood flow across the mitral valve measured by VEC-MR (5610 +/- 620 ml/min) was not statistically different from the cardiac output measured from the ascending aorta by VEC-MR (5670 +/- 590 ml/min) or by left ventricular cine magnetic resonance imaging (5440 +/- 614 ml/min). The left atrial contribution to left ventricular filling was 25.9 +/- 7.5%. Our results indicate that VEC-MR can be used not only for evaluation of left ventricular diastolic filling from the mitral valve and pulmonary vein flow velocities but also for quantitative measurement of the volume of blood flow across the mitral valve.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
To evaluate the effect of mitral valve repair on the regression of left ventricular mass, we studied 50 consecutive patients with severe, pure mitral regurgitation undergoing mitral valve repair. Two-dimensional echocardiograms were recorded a mean 2.5 +/- 2.0 weeks before and 6.5 +/- 2.5 months after valve operation. Postoperative significant mitral regurgitation was present in 3 patients. After mitral valve repair there were significant decreases in left ventricular end-diastolic volume index (133 +/- 39 mL/m2 to 79 +/- 35 mL/m2; p < 0.001), end-systolic volume index (44 +/- 26 mL/m2 to 30 +/- 26 mL/m2; p < 0.001), stroke volume index (89 +/- 29 mL/m2 to 49 +/- 19 mL/m2; p < 0.001), and mass index (211 +/- 82 g/m2 to 134 +/- 52 g/m2; p < 0.001). There also were significant decreases in left atrial dimension (47 +/- 9 mm to 38 +/- 9 mm; p < 0.001), left ventricular end-diastolic dimension (61 +/- 8 mm to 48 +/- 7 mm; p < 0.001), and end-systolic dimension (39 +/- 8 mm to 32 +/- 7 mm; p < 0.001). Left ventricular ejection fraction decreased slightly from 0.69 +/- 0.12 to 0.64 +/- 0.12; p < 0.01) after repair. Thus, correction of pure mitral regurgitation leads to reduction of the cardiac chamber size and left ventricular volumes as well as regression of the left ventricular mass.
Two patients with a prolapse and cleft posterior mitral leaflet were studied. The first case had an associated ostium secundum type atrial septal defect. In both cases, the pansystolic regurgitation of contrast material during angiography corresponded to the pansystolic configuration of the murmur. In each instance, the systolic murmurs displayed a late systolic accentuation during the maximal prolapse of the mitral valve. The echocardiographic studies demonstrated only a late systolic prolapse which in both patients corresponded angiocardiographically to the maximum buckling of the pansystolic prolapse. Echocardiographic and angiocardiographic features of cleft posterior mitral valve leaflet are discussed.