On Surgical therapy of mitral stenosis.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
SEARCH · Search PubMed
Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.
Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
RATIONALE: A new diagnostic approach is reported, which combines Doppler echocardiography and a thermodilution technique for the calculation of mitral valve area at rest and during exercise. This method was applied to determine the magnitude of mitral valve reserve (= exercise-induced increase of mitral valve are) and to assess the hemodynamic relevance of mitral stenosis. METHODS: 69 patients with mitral stenosis were included in this study. A Swan-Ganz catheter was used to measure exercise hemodynamics and transvalvular flow by a thermodilution technique. The mean transmitral flow velocity vmean was determined by continuous wave Doppler. Measurements were performed simultaneously at rest and during stepwise bicycle ergometry. Effective mitral valve area was calculated according to the continuity equation method (MVACE = Flow/vmean). RESULTS: A significant exercise-induced increase of mitral valve area was found in the total group (rest-->25 W: 1.1 +/- 0.3-->1.3 +/- 0.4 cm2, p < 0.001). Two subgroups were defined according to the presence or absence of mitral valve reserve: delta MVA > and = 20%: group A (n = 30); delta MVA < 20%: group B (n = 39). Both groups did not differ with regard to mitral valve area at rest. However, the increase of cardiac output and stroke volume was significantly higher in group A than in group B. An effective mitral valve area at 25 W of less than 1.2 cm2 had an 80% sensitivity and an 83% specificity to detect a severe mitral stenosis. CONCLUSIONS: Because the presence and extent of mitral valve reserve cannot be predicted under resting conditions measurements under flow-increasing interventions are necessary. Our data demonstrate that exercise Doppler in conjunction with right-sided cardiac catheterization is most useful to determine mitral valve reserve and to assess the hemodynamic relevance of mitral stenosis.
OBJECTIVES: To determine if a relationship exists in mitral stenosis, in patients with either sinus rhythm or atrial fibrillation, between left atrial spontaneous echo contrast and the haematologic indices haematocrit, red cell concentration, mean corpuscular volume, platelet count and volume. METHODS: Left atrial spontaneous echo contrast severity was graded on a scale of 0-4 in 163 patients with symptomatic mitral stenosis (84 patients in sinus rhythm, 79 patients in atrial fibrillation) undergoing transesophageal echocardiography, cardiac catheterization and full blood examination as part of assessment prior to balloon mitral valvuloplasty. RESULTS: In sinus rhythm, spontaneous echo contrast grade was negatively correlated with cardiac index (r=-0.33), mitral valve area (r=-0.25) and mitral regurgitation grade (r=-0.22) and positively correlated with haematocrit (r=0.24) and red cell concentration (r=0.25). Spontaneous echo contrast grade was not correlated with left atrial diameter or mean corpuscular volume. In atrial fibrillation, spontaneous echo contrast grade was also negatively correlated with mitral valve area (r=-0.25) and mitral regurgitation (r=-0.36) but was positively correlated with left atrial diameter (r=0.34) and was not correlated with cardiac index, haematocrit or red cell concentration. There was no correlation between spontaneous echo contrast grade and platelet variables in either group. CONCLUSIONS: Natural variation in red cell concentration in patients with symptomatic mitral stenosis was an independent predictor of the severity of left atrial spontaneous echo contrast in sinus rhythm, but no relationship between red cell concentration and spontaneous echo contrast grade was evident in atrial fibrillation.
In order to establish a method for measuring quantitatively turbulent shear stress (TSS) downstream of mitral stenosis in vivo based on Doppler echocardiography and computer-aided image analysis, we used doppler echocardiography to record the spectrum of flow velocity downstream of mitral valve at several locations in normal persons and in patients with mitral stenosis. With the computer-aided analysis of spectrum images, the magnitude of TSS was measured at the locations. The results demonstrate that no matter how severe the mitral stenosis is, the TSS and relative turbulent intensity(Irel) at the central locations of jet are lower than those at the marginal ones. A significant difference in the quantitative items of TSS, Irel and flow field uniformity between normal persons and patients with varying-degree of mitral stenosis was noticed (P < 0.05). There was a significant correlation between these items and effective orifice area (EOA), and we found that the smaller EOA is, the more severe the extent of stenosis is and the greater the magnitude of both TSS and Irel are, and that the highest magnitude of TSS is focused on the marginal area of jet. These results indicate that there is an obvious correlation between TSS(measured by Doppler echocardiography combined with computer-aided image analysis) and flow field uniformity. They can coincidently reveal the hemodynamic changes resulting from mitral stenosis of varied severeness, implying that our method could exactly depict the magnitude of TSS downstream of mitral stenosis in vivo and is non-invasive and good for anti-disturbance. The method can be used to analyze quantitatively TSS in the flow field of heart valve in patients with valvular diseases.
An unusual normal posterior direction of motion of the posterior mitral valve leaflet echo during diastole was detected in a patient whose clinical and hemodynamic data confirmed the presence of significant rheumatic mitral stenosis after other conditions causing echocardiographic pattern of "false" mitral stenosis were ruled out. The finding of normal direction of motion of the posterior mitral valve leaflet when associated with abnormal EF slope of the anterior mitral valve leaflet does not rule out the existence of significant mitral stenosis.
AIMS: The randomized NASPEAF study included non-valvular with prior embolism and mitral stenosis patients in the same group. This is a sub-study to specially focus on the antithrombotic therapy in mitral stenosis. METHODS AND RESULTS: We analysed 311 patients with mitral stenosis, compared with 175 non-valvular atrial fibrillation patients with prior embolism, stratified by a history of previous embolism and assigned to anticoagulant therapy [target international normalized ratio (INR) = 2.0-3.0] or combined antiplatelet plus moderate intensity anticoagulant therapy. Median follow-up was 2.9 years. Outcomes were fatal and non-fatal embolism, stroke and myocardial infarction, sudden death, and death from bleeding. Combined therapy in mitral stenosis patients, compared with anticoagulant alone therapy, reduced the risk of vascular events by 58.3%. During equal therapy, the outcome annual rates were essentially the same in non-valvular and valvular patients [hazard ratio 0.90 (95% confidence interval 0.37-2.16), P = 0.81]. During anticoagulant alone therapy, the annual event rate in mitral stenosis patients without prior embolism was low (2.5%) and it was very high in patients with prior embolism (6.6%). CONCLUSION: Combined therapy was effective in mitral stenosis patients. Prior embolism patients are not efficiently protected with anticoagulant alone therapy for an INR of 2.0-3.0.
Changes of hemodynamics, oxygen delivery and consumption were studied in 20 patients with rheumatic mitral stenosis, undergoing mitral valve replacement, anesthesied induction with propofol(Group P) or midazolam(Group M). The results showed that hemodynamic values were decreased after intravenous propofol, and recovery after tracheal intubation. Hemodynamic values also decreased and last to 2 min after tracheal intubation in Group M. The reduction degree of HR in Group P were more, the degree of SVRI,. LVSWI, RVSWI less than those in Group M respectively. Oxygen consumption decreased more than delivery. It is suggested that induction of anesthesia with propofol in patients with rheumatic mitral stenosis is safe, and may be advantageous than midazolam.
A real-time, phased-array, two-dimensional echocardiography system was used to assess mitral valve motion in 30 catheterized patients with pure mitral stenosis. Suitable images for analysis of mitral valve motion were obtained in 25 patients. The valve leaflets were most thickened and immobile at the leaflet tips while maximum mobility was at the leaflet body. Diastolic movement of anterior mitral leaflet toward the septum pulled the posterior mitral leaflet mid-portion inferiorly. Systolic bulging of the mid-portion of the anterior mitral leaflet into the left atrium was seen in 40% (10 of 25). Movement of the anterior mitral leaflet in diastole is primarily due to movement of the whole mitral apparatus in patients with mitral stenosis. The anterior mitral leaflet E to F slopes did not correlate (r=0.38) with the mitral valve area determined at catheterization. Planimetry of the mitral valve area directly from the videotape images compared favorably to the valve area determined at catheterization (r=0.95). Thus, mitral valve area determined by this technique is an accurate noninvasive method for assessing the severity of mitral stenosis.¿
During a 12-mth period 162 consecutive patients with mitral stenosis underwent examination by M-mode as well as cross-sectional echocardiography. The mitral valve area was measured by cross-sectional echocardiography ad the severity of mitral stenosis by M-mode echocardiography. Out of the total, 69 patients underwent left and right heart catheterization and in 53 of these the mitral valve area was calculated. A correlation of r=0.92 for the mitral valve area was found between sector scan echocardiography and cardiac catheterization, whereas the correlation between M-mode echocardiography and catheterization yielded a result of only r=0.38. Thus the assessment of the severity of mitral stenosis by cross-sectional echocardiography is a reliable alternative to cardiac catheterization.
The hemodynamic response to closed mitral commissurotomy, single-balloon, and double-balloon mitral valvuloplasty was compared using 20 patients in each group. All patients had symptomatic rheumatic mitral stenosis with a mitral valve area < 1 cm2, without any left atrial clot, mitral valve calcification, or mitral regurgitation. There was a significant improvement in hemodynamics following intervention in all three groups. The mean pulmonary artery pressure decreased from 49.1 +/- 17.5 to 28.6 +/- 8.3 mm Hg (p < 0.001), 48.8 +/- 12.3 to 34.0 +/- 13.9 mm Hg (p < 0.001), and 46.7 +/- 18.0 to 26.3 +/- 13.7 mm Hg (p < 0.001) in the closed mitral commissurotomy, single-balloon, and double-balloon mitral valvuloplasty groups, respectively. The mitral valve area increased from 0.62 +/- 0.27 to 1.5 +/- 0.5 cm2 (p < 0.001), 0.68 +/- 0.24 to 1.5 +/- 0.4 cm2 (p < 0.001), and 0.68 +/- 0.25 to 1.9 +/- 0.8 cm2 (p < 0.001) in the closed mitral commissurotomy, single-balloon, and double-balloon mitral valvuloplasty groups, respectively. The increase in the mitral valve area was maximum in the group with double-balloon mitral valvuloplasty. In the closed mitral commissurotomy group there was a significant rise in left ventricular end-diastolic pressure, from 6.8 +/- 3.9 to 9.3 +/- 3.1 mm Hg (p < 0.001), but this remained unchanged in the single-balloon and double-balloon mitral valvuloplasty groups. Our study shows that single-balloon and double-balloon mitral valvuloplasty are comparable to closed mitral commissurotomy in the immediate hemodynamic response, with a larger valve area in the double-balloon mitral valvuloplasty group.
BACKGROUND: Increased plasma endothelin-1 concentrations have been observed in patients with rheumatic mitral stenosis. Endothelin-1 levels have never been investigated in patients with mitral stenosis and history of cerebral thromboembolism. METHODS: We measured plasma concentrations of endothelin-1 in the peripheral venous blood samples obtained from 20 patients with moderate to severe rheumatic mitral stenosis (16 with permanent atrial fibrillation and 4 with sinus rhythm). Six patients had history of thromboembolism. The remaining 14 patients did not have history of thromboembolism. Plasma endothelin-1 concentrations were measured using solid phase sandwich enzyme linked-immuno-sorbent assay. RESULTS: The peripheral venous concentrations of endothelin-1 of the six patients with history of thromboembolism did not differ from the concentrations of the 14 patients without history of thromboembolism (2.40 +/- 1.39 pg/ml vs. 2.49 +/- 0.66 pg/ml, p = 0.9). CONCLUSIONS: Although plasma endothelin-1 concentrations were increased in patients with mitral stenosis, plasma endothelin-1 concentrations were not further elevated in patients with mitral stenosis and history of thromboembolism.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the surgical technique and the effect of preservation of the entire mitral subvalvular apparatus during mitral valve replacement (MVR) in patients with mitral stenosis. METHODS: MVR was performed on 56 patients with mitral stenosis. Of them, 11 had complete preservation of the entire mitral subvalvular apparatus (group A) with the technique of preservation of 'button-shaped' transplantation, 25 had the preservation of the posterior leaflet only (group B), and the other 20 underwent the conventional MVR (group C). Pre- and postoperative hemodynamic parameters were measured to determine the left ventricular performance. Echocardiography was performed preoperatively, at the time of discharge, and 3 to approximately 6 months postoperatively to determine the dimensions and ejection function. RESULTS: Cardiac index, stroke volume index and left ventricular stroke work index postoperatively in group A were better than those in group B and C (P < 0.05). Echocardiographic measurements postoperatively showed the increase of LVESD, LVEDD in group B and C, but a better LVL and LVFS in group A (P < 0.05), and LVEF was more pronounced in group A (P < 0.05). There appeared a long cross-clamp time in group A, but the total CPB time was not significant among the three groups. CONCLUSION: The surgical skills of preservation with 'button-shaped' transplantation may be a practical choice for patients with mitral stenosis. The preservation of entire mitral subvalvular apparatus improves the left ventricular functions after MVR in patients with mitral valve stenosis.
Twenty-nine patients with moderate mitral stenosis and 29 age-matched normal controls underwent symptom-limited upright bicycle exercise testing with simultaneous hemodynamic monitoring. Exercise tolerance in the mitral stenosis group was found to be limited by inadequate cardiac output reserve and not by resting mitral valve area or exercise pulmonary capillary wedge pressure.
We prospectively evaluated 50 patients with mitral stenosis (43 women and 7 men; mean age 45 years) to assess the results of surgical reconstruction of the mitral valve. All patients underwent a complete echocardiographic examination before and after operation. Surgical reconstruction was extensive, and included commissurotomy, thinning of the valvular leaflets, calcification removal, splitting of subvalvular apparatus, and posterior annuloplasty. Surgical reconstruction resulted in increasing mitral functional area from 0.89 +/- 0.23 to 2.07 +/- 0.42 cm2. NYHA functional class decreased from 2.76 +/- 0.55 to 1.52 +/- 0.71. Before discharging, 10% of patients had moderate mitral insufficiency. All patients were followed at 6-month intervals in our clinic. Mean follow-up was 37 +/- 18 months. During follow-up 5 patients (10%) developed severe mitral incompetence, which required mitral valve replacement. Chi-square and Student t-test were used to analyze the correlation between variables and outcome. The occurrence of severe mitral incompetence was correlated with: the degree of enlarged left atrium; chronic atrial fibrillation; postoperative more than mild mitral regurgitation. No correlation was found with anatomical parameters detected by echocardiography, or intraoperative anatomy. In conclusion, surgical reconstruction of mitral stenosis provides satisfactory short-term results. We believe that the low mortality rate and the low incidence of complications justify an effort to save the native mitral valve before considering prosthetic replacement. More attention to the development of residual mitral incompetence with intraoperative control may improve long-term results.
The paper presents the results of an examination of 292 patients with Stages II-V mitral stenosis. Clinical, roentgenological, and electrocardiographic characteristics of the defect were analysed. Physical fitness and gas exchange during exercise were studied in 183 patients with Stages III and IV mitral stenosis. The findings were compared with the intensity of tissue oxygen exchange and the levels of myocardial myoglobin. The patients with mitral stenosis exhibited lower exercise tolerance that was more pronounced in Stage IV. The patients also displayed characteristic profound disturbances in work energy regimen, lower reserve potentialities and functional mobility of the cardiorespiratory system. The pronounced changes in the acid-base balance and gas composition of their capillary blood in Stage IV mitral stenosis during exercise may be explained by a sharply marked arteriolar barrier in the pulmonary circulation (a paracompensatory reaction). The comparison of physiological and clinical findings has enabled the relationship of mechanisms responsible for compensation and paracompensation to be evaluated at various stages of mitral stenosis.