Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Leasing, Property”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 397 records · Page 22Linked to original sources

Strategic asset management: alternatives for capital acquisitions.

A well-designed asset-management plan can reduce capital costs by prioritizing equipment and technology purchase requests and optimizing use of existing resources. Instead of purchasing new equipment, underused equipment can be moved to where it is needed. Completely overhauling equipment that is showing signs of wear may be more cost-effective than simply repairing individual components as they fail. Leasing equipment can help improve an organization's cash flow and balance sheet, while avoiding potential future concerns about obsolescence.

Capital Expenditures↗

Avoiding leasing pitfalls.

Even though most physicians will only negotiate a few leases during their careers, it pays to be proficient in the language of leasing. Understanding a few key terms and concepts up front will prevent unnecessary hassles and unexpected expense. This article explains some of the most common misunderstandings in the leasing process, such as types of leases, rentable vs. usable space, escalations, and other considerations. Physicians will benefit from these practical suggestions by learning what questions to ask before signing a lease.

Leasing, Property↗

Selling real estate to meet capital needs.

Real estate can provide a means for hospitals to raise capital. Selling a building and investing proceeds in revenue-producing operations may yield greater return than rental income. In a ground lease, a hospital can require the buyer to adhere to certain limitations that are beneficial to the hospital's strategic goals.

Capital Financing↗

Laser technology planning.

Lasers continue to be a highly useful and important surgical tool, and, in today's competitive healthcare environment, they are also an effective marketing tool. The public perceives lasers to be "high-tech" instruments, associating them with excellence of care. And the availability of state-of-the-art equipment such as lasers is often critical to medical staff recruitment. However, lasers are not universal surgical tools, as some proponents suggest. They are costly, and other less expensive technologies are acceptable and sometimes more desirable for certain procedures. Also, marketing reasons alone cannot justify laser acquisition. Faced with new, more restrictive federal regulations for Medicare reimbursement of capital expenses, hospitals need effective technology planning more than ever, particularly when planning for such "high-ticket" items as lasers. They can no longer afford to acquire lasers based on the perceptions of the public or the demands of one or even a few physicians; poor planning in the past has caused many new lasers to collect dust from low utilization. (ECRI's 1991 user survey on general-purpose surgical lasers found that, on average, hospitals use lasers in less than 5% of their total surgical procedures.) Hospitals need to approach the acquisition of laser technology cautiously to ensure that the appropriate equipment is obtained, that it will be well utilized for procedures in which it offers a demonstrable improvement over alternative technologies, and that it will also conform to the overall strategic plan of the institution. The purpose of this article is to provide guidance on the technology acquisition process, whether a hospital is acquiring its first laser or has a well-established laser program.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Capital Expenditures↗