Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Health Insurance”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 397 records · Page 22Linked to original sources

A second opinion: rethinking the public-private dichotomy for health insurance.

Does the public-private dichotomy effectively describe health insurance systems in the advanced industrialized democracies? Is the boundary separating the public and private sectors accurate for studies o f social policy formation and cutback? This article has three goals. The first is to discuss reasons for reconsidering the public-private dichotomy, as it applies to health insurance systems. The second is to offer a reconceptualization of the public-private demarcation useful for analyses of health insurance systems; the author presents four sectors that may illuminate patterns of health insurance for different OECD countries: the social, individual, public, and market sectors. The third goal is to present results using a new methodological approach useful for studying complex social phenomena: the fuzzy-set approach, which allows researchers to treat social phenomena as partially belonging to more than one category. This approach is employed to demonstrate that health insurance provision rarely is solely public or private, but is formed by a combination of sectors. Underlying these three goals is the contention that comparative and historical sociological researchers can offer innovative approaches to the study of health insurance and the interests served by public and nonpublic health insurance programs through reconceiving the public-private dichotomy.

Data Collection↗

Consumers' use of the Internet for health insurance.

OBJECTIVES: We examined consumers' search for information about health insurance choices and their use of the Internet for that search and to manage health benefits. STUDY DESIGN: We surveyed a random sample of more than 4500 individuals aged 21 years and older who were members of a survey research panel during December 2001 and January 2002. METHODS: The survey included questions about searching for health insurance information in 3 health insurance markets: Medicare, individual or nongroup, and employer-sponsored group. We also asked questions about use of the Internet to manage health benefits. We tabulated means of responses to each question by market and tested for independence across demographic groups using the Pearson chi-square test. RESULTS: We identified important differences across and within markets in the extent to which people look for information about health insurance alternatives and the role of the Internet in their search. Although many individuals were unaware of whether their employer or health plan provided a website to manage health benefits, those who used the sites generally evaluated them favorably. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that the Internet is an important source of health insurance information, particularly for individuals purchasing coverage individually in the nongroup and Medicare markets relative to those obtaining coverage from an employer. In the case of Medicare coverage, studies focusing on beneficiaries' use of Internet resources may underestimate the Internet's importance by neglecting caregivers who use the Internet. Many individuals may be unaware of the valuable resources available through employers or health plans.

Adult↗

Conceptualising the lack of health insurance coverage.

This paper examines the lack of health insurance coverage in the US as a public policy issue. It first compares the problem of health insurance coverage to the problem of unemployment to show that in terms of the numbers of individuals affected lack of health insurance is a problem comparable in importance to the problem of unemployment. Secondly, the paper discusses the methodology involved in measuring health insurance coverage, and argues that the current method of estimation of the uninsured underestimates the extent that individuals go without health insurance. Third, the paper briefly introduces Amartya Sen's functioning and capabilities framework to suggest a way of representing the extent to which individuals are uninsured. Fourth, the paper sketches a means of operationalizing the Sen representation of the uninsured in terms of the disability-adjusted life year (DALY) measure.

Insurance Coverage↗

Explaining the decline in health insurance coverage, 1979-1995.

The decline in health insurance coverage among workers from 1979 to 1995 can be accounted for almost entirely by the fact that per capita health care spending rose much more rapidly than personal income during this time period. We simulate health insurance coverage levels for 1996-2005 under alternative assumptions concerning the rate of growth of spending. We conclude that reduction in spending growth creates measurable increases in health insurance coverage for low-income workers and that the rapid increase in health care spending over the past fifteen years has created a large pool of low-income workers for whom health insurance is unaffordable.

Adult↗

Switching Swiss enrollees from indemnity health insurance to managed care: the effect on health status and stisfaction with care.

OBJECTIVES: In 1992, most members of a Swiss indemnity health insurance plan were automatically transferred into a newly created managed care organization. This study examined whether this semivoluntary change affected enrollees' health status and satisfaction with care. METHODS: Three groups of enrollees were compared: 332 plan members who accepted the switch (managed care joiners); 186 plan members who opted to maintain indemnity coverage (non-joiners); and 296 persons continuosly enrolled in another indemnity plan (indemnity plan members). Health status, health related behaviors, and satisfaction with care received in the previous year were surveyed at baseline and 1 year later. RESULTS: Health status remained unchanged in all three groups. Smoking prevalence decreased among managed care joiners but remained constant in the other groups. Satisfaction with insurance coverage increased between baseline and follow-up in managed care joiners, but decreased in nonjoiners and indemnity plan members. The latter groups had higher satisfaction with health care, particularly with continuity of care. CONCLUSIONS: A semivoluntary switch from indemnity health insurance to managed care reduced satisfaction with health care but increased satisfaction with insurance coverage. There were no changes in self-perceived health status.

Adult↗

Health insurance system in the Republic of Macedonia.

The current health insurance system of the Republic of Macedonia was introduced by the Health Protection Law, which was adopted in 1991 and modified and supplemented by the amendments in 1993 and 1995. According to this Law, health insurance was established as an obligatory, supplementary obligatory, and voluntary insurance for certain kinds of health care. This report gives an insight into the specificities and practice of all three types of insurance in the Republic of Macedonia. A person can become an insured to the Health Insurance Fund on the basis of 23 modalities. More than 80% of the citizens are eligible to the obligatory health insurance, which provides a broad scope of basic health care rights. Payroll contributions are equal to 8.6% of gross earned wages and more than 70% of health sector revenues are derived from them. Besides some other basic resources and contributions for health financing, co-payments for health care expenses by users were introduced in 1993. Health financing and reform of the health insurance system are of high importance within the ongoing health care reform in the Republic of Macedonia. It is expected that the new Law on health insurance will strengthen the mechanisms for collecting revenues and introduce new methods of co-payment and risk-adjusted reallocation of the funds related to age structure and health status of the population.

Cost Sharing↗

The structure and enforcement of health insurance rating reforms.

Requiring health insurers to cover everyone who applies regardless of health status--an approach called "guaranteed issue"--is severely hampered without accompanying rating restrictions that keep insurance affordable for higher-risk people. The degree of rating flexibility also determines how much insurers can continue to compete based on their skills at risk selection, and how well they can counter adverse selection. Therefore, the structure and enforcement of rating reforms are essential to how insurance market reforms function. Based on an in-depth qualitative study in seven states with insurers, agents, and regulators, this article explains the factors that determine the stringency of rating reforms, and details how various aspects of rating restrictions can be used strategically to engage in greater risk segmentation than first appears possible. The article concludes by reflecting on the appropriate degree of complexity in rating rules, and it offers recommendations for crafting rating reforms that avoid unintended consequences.

Actuarial Analysis↗

The movement for universal health insurance: finding common ground.

Before 1971, all proposals for universal health insurance were based on private sector financing and administration. After 1971, universal health insurance plans relying on the private sector complicated efforts of the universal health insurance movement. To forge as broad a movement for universal health insurance as possible, it may be worthwhile for universal health insurance advocates of different persuasions to seek common ground on the basis of a set of goals for a new health care system. The goals can serve as a measuring stick to determine which health insurance plans are worthy of support.

Cooperative Behavior↗

The new child health insurance expansions: how will school-based health centers fit in?

In June 1998, the Making the Grade National Program Office and the National Assembly on School-Based Health Care sponsored a workshop on the relationship between the State Child Health Insurance Program (SCHIP) and school-based health centers. Workshop participants used the health centers' experience with Medicaid managed care as a window for understanding their prospects for negotiating contracts with health plans under SCHIP. Speakers representing the federal perspective, state agencies, health plans, and local school-based health centers offered their views on the challenges of developing contracts, incentives, and disincentives that health plans have to contract with school-based health centers, and what has accounted for success where relationships are moving forward. Experiences in Colorado and Connecticut were presented as case studies on these evolving issues.

Child↗

The impact of a Children's health insurance program by age.

OBJECTIVES: 1) To examine age variation in unmet need/delayed care, access, utilization, and restricted activities attributable to lack of health insurance in children before they receive health insurance; and 2) to examine the effect of health insurance on these indicators within each age group of children (in years). METHODS: We use cohort data on children before and after receiving health insurance. The study population consists of 750 children, 0 through 19 years of age, newly enrolling in two children's health programs. The families of the newly enrolled children were interviewed at the time of their enrollment (baseline), and again at 6 months and 1 year after enrollment. The dependent variables measured included access to regular provider, utilization, unmet need or delayed health care, and restrictions on activities attributable to health insurance status. All these indicator variables were examined by age groups (0-5, 6-10, 11-14, and 15-19 years of age). chi(2) tests were performed to determine whether these dependent variables varied by age at baseline. Using logistic regression, odds ratios were calculated for baseline indicators by age group of child, adjusting for variables commonly found to be associated with health insurance status and utilization. Changes in indicator variables from before to after receiving health insurance within each age group were documented and tested using the McNemar test. A comparison group of families of children enrolling newly 12 months later were interviewed to identify any potential effects of trend. RESULTS: All ages of children saw statistically significant improvements in access, reduced unmet/delayed care, dental utilization, and childhood activities. Before obtaining health insurance, older children, compared with younger children, were more likely to have had unmet/delayed care, to have not received health care, to have low access, and to have had activities limited by their parents. This pattern held for all types of care except dental care. Age effects were strong and independent of covariates. After being covered by health insurance, the majority of the delayed care, low utilization, low access, and limited activities in the older age groups (11-14 and 15-19 years) was eliminated. Thus, as levels of unmet need, delayed care, and limitations in activities approached zero in all age groups by 1 year after receipt of health insurance, age variation in these variables was eliminated. By contrast, age variation in utilization remained detectable yet greatly reduced. CONCLUSION: Health insurance will reduce unmet need, delayed care, and restricted childhood activities in all age groups. Health care professionals and policy makers also should be aware of the especially high health care delay, unmet need, and restricted activities experienced by uninsured older children. The new state children's health insurance programs offer the potential to eliminate these problems. Realization of this potential requires that enrollment criteria, outreach strategies, and delivery systems be effectively fashioned so that all ages of children are enrolled in health insurance.

Adolescent↗

Employment-based health insurance: a look at tax issues and public opinion.

This Issue Brief provides background information on the employment-based health insurance system and its alternatives. The report discusses the advantages and disadvantages of the current employment-based health insurance system, the current tax treatment of health insurance, and the strength and weaknesses of recent proposals to introduce tax credits. It presents findings from the public opinion survey conducted by the Employee Benefit Research Institute on public attitudes toward health insurance and summarizes recent research on the effects of tax changes on employment-based health benefits and the uninsured. Employment-based health plans are the most common source of health insurance among nonelderly individuals in the United States, providing coverage to nearly two-thirds of this population in 1997. Health insurance is probably the benefit most used and valued by workers and their families. Sixty-four percent of respondents to a recent survey rated employment-based health insurance benefits as the most important benefit. Despite essentially five years of very low health care cost increases and the recent increase in the percentage of Americans with employment-based health insurance coverage, the uninsured population has continued to rise. This has resulted in a new interest among policymakers in finding ways to reverse this trend. One question that continues to be asked is whether the employment-based health insurance system is the appropriate mechanism for expanding health insurance to the uninsured. Employment-based health plans are popular because they offer many advantages over other forms of health insurance and types of delivery systems. However, there are also potential drawbacks to the employment-based system. The advantages include reduced risk of adverse selection, group-purchasing efficiencies, employers acting as a workers' advocate, delivery innovation, and health care quality. The disadvantages include an unfair tax treatment, lack of portability and job lock, little choice of health plans, and lack of universal coverage. The tax credit proposals for health insurance, which come in all shapes and sizes, would either enhance the current employment-based health insurance system or put it at risk. This has potentially enormous public policy implications, since the vast majority of Americans get their health insurance coverage through employers. Such a change may also have political implications, as public opinion currently may not support such a fundamental change in the U.S. health insurance system. A recent public opinion survey conducted by the Employee Benefit Research Institute found that 68 percent of Americans with employment-based health insurance were satisfied with the current mix of benefits and wages. The EBRI survey found that under a changing tax code scenario, there is still strong support for the employment-based system. Strong support for the employment-based system may be the result of respondents' lack of confidence in their ability to choose the best health plan if their employer stopped offering health insurance.

Data Collection↗

Low demand for substitutive voluntary health insurance in Germany.

AIM: To examine why the demand for substitutive voluntary health insurance in Germany is low. METHOD: A comparison of the benefits and costs of statutory and voluntary health insurance in Germany, based on a review of literature published in academic journals and books as well as gray literature. RESULTS: Employees in Germany with gross earnings over 40,500 Euros a year can choose to opt out of the statutory health insurance scheme (Gesetzliche Krankenversicherung, GKV) and purchase substitutive voluntary health insurance instead. Only a quarter of these employees and their dependents actually choose to opt out; the majority remain in the GKV. Substitutive voluntary health insurance does not generally afford greater benefits than the GKV in terms of services provided or choice of insurer and only affords marginal benefits in terms of choice of provider. It is also more expensive than the GKV for people with dependents, elderly people and people in poor health. Consequently, the choice to opt out and purchase substitutive voluntary health insurance is more likely to be taken by young, healthy or single people or couples with double incomes. CONCLUSION: Our analysis suggests that the demand for substitutive voluntary health insurance in Germany is low because the costs of opting out of the GKV are, in general, higher than the benefits afforded by purchasing substitutive voluntary health insurance. In the long term substitutive voluntary health insurance does not appear to provide good value for money when compared to the GKV, particularly for people with dependents, elderly people, and people in poor health.

Choice Behavior↗

A shared responsibility. US employers and the provision of health insurance to employees.

Employer-based health insurance is the backbone of the U.S. system of health insurance coverage. Yet it has been slowly eroding, and if these trends continue greater numbers of Americans are likely to be uninsured or without affordable coverage. Employer coverage has marked advantages, including benefits to employers and a natural risk pool that offers better benefits at lower cost than individual coverage, and is highly valued by employees. The shift of health care costs from employers who do not cover their workers to other parts of the economy is substantial. Very little attention has been given to policies that might strengthen and expand employer coverage. It will be important to shore up employer coverage both to curb its recent erosion and to build toward a more comprehensive system of health insurance.

Adult↗

Employers' benefits from workers' health insurance.

Even though many employers believe that health insurance and health affect employees' productivity and firms' performance, health economists typically overlook and rarely measure firms' returns on health-related investments. Some research, however, suggests that firms may benefit economically by providing health insurance coverage for workers and their families. For example, health coverage may help employers recruit and retain high-quality workers. Health may contribute to productivity by reducing the costs of absenteeism and turnover and by increasing workers' productivity. This article reviews the evidence and proposes an agenda for future research. A better understanding of the benefits to employers of offering health coverage to workers may help clarify employers' behavior and help private employers and public officials make appropriate investments in health.

Commerce↗

Protecting low-income children's access to care: are physician visits associated with reduced patient dropout from Medicaid and the Children's Health Insurance Program?

OBJECTIVE: Dropout among patients who are enrolled in Medicaid and the Children's Health Insurance Program contributes to a lack of health care access among millions of Americans. The purpose of this study was to determine which, if any, types of clinical contact with physicians are associated with reduced dropout among children who are enrolled in Medicaid and the Children's Health Insurance Program. METHODS: The data are from the nationally representative Medical Expenditure Panel Survey, 1998-2002. The sample is composed of all children (n = 3043) who were reported to have Medicaid or Children's Health Insurance Program coverage throughout their first year in the survey and who did not acquire other insurance during the study period. The outcome measure is whether an individual remained enrolled in Medicaid or the Children's Health Insurance Program by the end of the following year. Exposure variables were clinical contact during an individual's first year in the survey: numbers of office visits, hospital outpatient department visits, emergency department visits, inpatient hospital stays, and dental visits. The analysis uses multivariate logistic regression to control for patient and family characteristics-most important, health status, functional status, and overall health care expenditures. RESULTS: Eight percent of the children in the sample had left Medicaid/the Children's Health Insurance Program by the end of the second year in the survey. More frequent contact with clinicians in an office setting was associated with a significantly lower risk for dropping out of Medicaid/the Children's Health Insurance Program among children, even controlling for demographics, health and functional status, and overall health care expenditures. After multivariate adjustment, more frequent contact in hospital outpatient departments also was associated with reduced dropout, with a borderline statistically significant odds ratio. Notably, emergency visits and inpatient stays were not associated with any significant change in the risk of Medicaid/Children's Health Insurance Program dropout. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that some but not all types of clinician visits are serving an important function in maintaining Medicaid and the Children's Health Insurance Program coverage among low-income patients. Two possible approaches to improve access to care among low-income children therefore would be (1) increased awareness among clinicians, especially in hospitals and emergency departments, regarding Medicaid/Children's Health Insurance Program retention as an issue in the ongoing care of their patients and (2) Medicaid/Children's Health Insurance Program reimbursement of clinicians and their staff for assisting patients with the public insurance renewal process.

Aid to Families with Dependent Children↗

Children at risk: their health insurance status by state.

OBJECTIVE: To inform policymakers and child health advocates about children's health insurance coverage in each state as Congress debates proposals to restructure the Medicaid program amidst declining employer-based dependent health insurance coverage. METHODS: Multiple years of data from the March supplement of the Current Population Surveys were pooled to yield more reliable estimates of changes in children's health insurance coverage in each state from 1987 to 1993. RESULTS: Overall, the number of uninsured children grew by nearly 1 million between 1987 and 1993. The proportion of infants and children <7 years old without health insurance declined; the proportion of uninsured children between the ages of 7 and 22 increased. Between 1987-1990 and 1991-1993, six states experienced a significant increase in the number of uninsured children, only two states experienced a significant decrease in the number of uninsured children, although no progress was found in reducing the number of uninsured children in 43 states. Between 1987-1990 and 1991-1993, the proportion of children covered by employer-based private insurance decreased significantly in three-fourths of the states and the proportion of children with Medicaid coverage increased significantly in four-fifths of the states. CONCLUSIONS: In a period of fast-declining employer-based health insurance coverage for dependents, Medicaid expansions have worked to moderate the surge in the number of children without health insurance. Of the 30 million children without private health insurance in 1993, nearly 18 million were insured by Medicaid. As policymakers debate the future of the Medicaid program, they must consider seriously its role as the country's largest insurer of children's health and its efficacy as a vital safety net for the nation's children.

Adolescent↗

[Fair health financing and catastrophic health expenditures: potential impact of the coverage extension of the popular health insurance in Mexico].

OBJECTIVE: To assess the impact on fair health financing and household catastrophic health expenditures of the implementation of the Popular Health Insurance (Seguro Popular de Salud). MATERIAL AND METHODS: Data analyzed in this study come from the National Income and Expenditure Household Survey (Encuesta Nacional de Ingresos y Gastos de los Hogares, ENIGH), 2000, and the National Health Insurance and Expenditure Survey, (Encuesta Nacional de Aseguramiento y Gasto en Salud, ENAGS), 2001. Estimations are based on projections of extension of the Popular Health Insurance under different conditions of coverage and out-of-pocket expenditure reductions in the uninsured population. The mathematic simulation model assumes applying the new Popular Health Insurance financial structure to the 2000 expenditure values reported by ENIGH, given the probability of affiliation by households. RESULTS: The model of determinants of affiliation to the Popular Health Insurance yielded three significant variables: being in income quintiles I and II, being a female head of household, and that a household member had a medical visit in the past year. Simulation results show that important impacts on the performance of the Mexican Health System will occur in terms of fair financing and catastrophic expenditures, even before achieving the universal coverage goal in 2010. A reduction of 40% in out-of-pocket expenditures and a Popular Health Insurance coverage of 100% will decrease catastrophic health expenditures from 3.4% to 1.6%. CONCLUSIONS: Our results show that the reduction of out-of-pocket expenditures generated by the new financing and health provision Popular Health Insurance model, will improve the financial fairness index and the financial contribution to the health system, and will decrease the percentage of households with catastrophic expenditures, even before reaching universal coverage. A greater impact may be expected due to coverage extension initiating in the poorest communities that have a very restricted and progressive financial contribution.

Adolescent↗