Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “GPCR”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 397 records · Page 22Linked to original sources
PubMed2006

G-protein-coupled receptors and asthma endophenotypes: the cysteinyl leukotriene system in perspective.

Genetic variation in specific G-protein coupled receptors (GPCRs) is associated with a spectrum of respiratory disease predispositions and drug response phenotypes. Although certain GPCR gene variants can be disease-causing through the expression of inactive, overactive, or constitutively active receptor proteins, many more GPCR gene variants confer risk for potentially deleterious endophenotypes. Endophenotypes are traits, such as bronchiole hyperactivity, atopy, and aspirin intolerant asthma, which have a strong genetic component and are risk factors for a variety of more complex outcomes that may include disease states. GPCR genes implicated in asthma endophenotypes include variants of the cysteinyl leukotriene receptors (CYSLTR1 and CYSLTR2), and prostaglandin D2 receptors (PTGDR and CRTH2), thromboxane A2 receptor (TBXA2R), beta2-adrenergic receptor (ADRB2), chemokine receptor 5 (CCR5), and the G protein-coupled receptor associated with asthma (GPRA). This review of the contribution of variability in these genes places the contribution of the cysteinyl leukotriene system to respiratory endophenotypes in perspective. The genetic variant(s) of receptors that are associated with endophenotypes are discussed in the context of the extent to which they contribute to a disease phenotype or altered drug efficacy.

Aspirin↗
PubMed2006

Receptor-receptor interactions involving adenosine A1 or dopamine D1 receptors and accessory proteins.

The molecular basis for the known intramembrane receptor-receptor interactions among heptahelical receptors (G protein coupled receptors, GPCR) was postulated to be heteromerization based on receptor subtype specific interactions between different types of homomers of GPCR. Adenosine and dopamine receptors in the basal ganglia have been fundamental to demonstrate the existence of receptor heteromers and the functional consequences of such molecular interactions. The heterodimer is only one type of heteromeric complex and the evidence is equally compatible with the existence of higher order heteromeric complexes, where also adapter proteins such as homer proteins and scaffolding proteins can exist, assisting in the process of linking the GPCR and ion channel receptors together in a receptor mosaic that may have special integrative value and may constitute the molecular basis for learning and memory. Heteromerization of D(2) dopamine and A(2A) adenosine receptors is reviewed by Fuxe in another article in this special issue. Here, heteromerization between D(1) dopamine and A(1) adenosine receptors is reviewed. Heteromers formed by dopamine D(1) and D(2) receptors and by adenosine A(1) and A(2A) receptors also occur in striatal cells and open new perspectives to understand why two receptors with apparently opposite effects are expressed in the same neuron and in the nerve terminals. The role of accessory proteins also capable of interacting with receptor-receptor heteromers in regulating the traffic and the molecular physiology of these receptors is also discussed. Overall, the knowledge of the reason why such complex networks of receptor-receptor and receptor-protein interactions occur in striatal cells is crucial to develop new strategies to combat neurological and neuropsychiatric diseases.

Animals↗
PubMed2006

Characterization of the Caenorhabditis elegans G protein-coupled serotonin receptors.

Serotonin (5-HT) regulates a wide range of behaviors in Caenorhabditis elegans, including egg laying, male mating, locomotion and pharyngeal pumping. So far, four serotonin receptors have been described in the nematode C. elegans, three of which are G protein-coupled receptors (GPCR), (SER-1, SER-4 and SER-7), and one is an ion channel (MOD-1). By searching the C. elegans genome for additional 5-HT GPCR genes, we identified five further genes which encode putative 5-HT receptors, based on sequence similarities to 5-HT receptors from other species. Using loss-of-function mutants and RNAi, we performed a systematic study of the role of the eight GPCR genes in serotonin-modulated behaviors of C. elegans (F59C12.2, Y22D7AR.13, K02F2.6, C09B7.1, M03F4.3, F16D3.7, T02E9.3, C24A8.1). We also examined their expression patterns. Finally, we tested whether the most likely candidate receptors were able to modulate adenylate cyclase activity in transfected cells in a 5-HT-dependent manner. This paper is the first comprehensive study of G protein-coupled serotonin receptors of C. elegans. It provides a direct comparison of the expression patterns and functional roles for 5-HT receptors in C. elegans.

Amino Acid Sequence↗
PubMed2005

G-protein-coupled receptor agonists differentially regulate basal or tumor necrosis factor-alpha-stimulated activation of interleukin-6 and RANTES in human airway smooth muscle cells.

Using thapsigargin (Tg), an agent that mobilizes calcium by directly emptying intracellular stores, we previously showed that intracellular calcium may play an important role in the regulation of intercellular adhesion molecule (ICAM)-1 gene expression induced by cytokines in human airway smooth muscle (ASM) cells. In the present study, we extended this previous observation by comparing the effect of Tg and other calcium-mobilizing G-protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) agonists on the expression of different pro-inflammatory genes in response to tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-alpha in ASM cells. We found that in resting cells, Tg (10-100 nM) or the bradykinin (BK) (1-10 muM) and thrombin (Thr) (1 U/ml) stimulated interleukin (IL)-6 secretion but had no effect on regulated on activation, normal T cells expressed and secreted (RANTES) levels. More importantly, such calcium-mobilizing agents significantly enhanced TNF-alpha-induced IL-6 secretion while RANTES secretion was abrogated. The use of luciferase-tagged IL-6 and RANTES promoter constructs demonstrated similar effects of Tg on IL-6 and RANTES genes in basal and TNF-alpha-stimulated conditions. The cyclic adenosine monophosphate (cAMP)-dependent pathway plays a minor role in this differential regulation of IL-6 and RANTES genes expression. 2-Aminoethoxydiphenyl borate (APB), a blocker of store-operated calcium channels (SOCs), and bisindolylmaleimide I (Bis I), a broad-spectrum protein kinase C (PKC) inhibitor, inhibited the basal and synergic effects of IL-6 secretion in response to calcium-mobilizing agents and TNF-alpha, but did not prevent the abrogated effect of RANTES secretion. We also found that Go-6976, a selective calcium-dependent PKC isozyme inhibitor, did not inhibit IL-6 secretion in response to GPCR agonist and TNF-alpha; whereas Rottlerlin, a PKC-delta inhibitor, inhibited both Thr- and TNF-alpha-induced expression of IL-6, while BK-induced IL-6 secretion was not affected. Interestingly, TNF-alpha-induced interferon regulatory factor (IRF)-1 activation was significantly inhibited by all calcium-mobilizing agents, BK, Thr and Tg. These results show that calcium-mobilizing GPCR agonists functionally interact with TNF-alpha to differentially regulate pro-inflammatory genes expression in human ASM cells, possibly by involving Tg-sensitive intracellular calcium stores, SOC and PKC.

Blotting, Western↗
PubMed2005

Immobilization of native membrane-bound rhodopsin on biosensor surfaces.

In this paper, we evaluated the grafting of G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) onto functionalized surfaces, which is a primary requirement to elaborate receptor-based biosensors, or to develop novel GPCR assays. Bovine rhodopsin, a prototypical GPCR, was used in the form of receptor-enriched membrane fraction. Quantitative immobilization of the membrane-bound rhodopsin either non-specifically on a carboxylated dextran surface grafted with long alkyl groups, or specifically on a surface coated with anti-rhodopsin antibody was demonstrated by surface plasmon resonance. In addition, a new substrate based on mixed self-assembled multilayer that anchors specific anti-receptor antibodies was developed. Electrochemical impedance spectroscopy performed upon deposition of membrane-bound rhodopsin of increasing concentration exhibited a significant change, until a saturation level was reached, indicating optimum receptor immobilization on the substrate. The structures obtained with this new immobilization procedure of the rhodopsin in its native membrane environment are stable, with a controlled density of specific anchoring sites. Therefore, such receptor immobilization method is attractive for a range of applications, especially in the field of GPCR biosensors.

Animals↗
PubMed2005

PKCepsilon-PKD1 signaling complex at Z-discs plays a pivotal role in the cardiac hypertrophy induced by G-protein coupling receptor agonists.

Cardiac hypertrophy is triggered in response to mechanical stress and various neurohumoral factors, such as G-protein coupling receptor (GPCR) and gp130 cytokine receptor agonists. Recent studies have suggested cardiac Z-disc plays a pivotal role to regulate these cellular responses. Here, we demonstrate stimulations with GPCR agonists (norepinephrine, angiotensin II, and endothelin 1) and phorbol ester activated and translocated protein kinase D1 (PKD1) to the Z-discs in neonatal rat cardiomyocytes in a protein kinase C (PKC)-dependent manner, whereas gp130 agonist did not. Especially, upon the alpha-adrenergic receptor agonist stimulations, following the PKCepsilon-PKD1 complex formation, PKCepsilon-dependent activation of PKD1 was essential to induce hypertrophic responses. Constitutively active mutant of either PKD1 or PKCepsilon also induced cardiac hypertrophy ex vivo. Taken together, the PKCepsilon-PKD1 complex at Z-discs could play a pivotal role in the cardiac hypertrophy induced by GPCR agonists, at least alpha-adrenergic receptor agonist.

Adrenergic alpha-Agonists↗
PubMed2005

Synthesis and pharmacological evaluation of second-generation phosphatidic acid derivatives as lysophosphatidic acid receptor ligands.

Short-chain phosphatidic acid derivatives, dioctanoyl glycerol pyrophosphate (DGPP 8:0, 1) and phosphatidic acid 8:0 (PA 8:0, 2), were previously identified as subtype-selective LPA(1) and LPA(3) receptor antagonists. Recently, we reported that the replacement of the phosphate headgroup by thiophosphate in a series of fatty alcohol phosphates (FAP) improves agonist as well as antagonist activities at LPA GPCR. Here, we report the synthesis of stereoisomers of PA 8:0 analogs and their biological evaluation at LPA GPCR, PPARgamma, and ATX. The results indicate that LPA receptors stereoselectively interact with glycerol backbone modified ligands. We observed entirely stereospecific responses by dioctyl PA 8:0 compounds, in which (R)-isomers were found to be agonists and (S)-isomers were antagonists of LPA GPCR. From this series, we identified compound 13b as the most potent LPA(3) receptor subtype-selective agonist (EC(50)=3 nM), and 8b as a potent and selective LPA(3) receptor antagonist (K(i)=5 nM) and inhibitor of ATX (IC(50)=600 nM). Serinediamide phosphate 19b was identified as an LPA(3) receptor specific antagonist with no effect on LPA(1), LPA(2), and PPARgamma.

Animals↗
PubMed2005

The regulatory mechanisms of export trafficking of G protein-coupled receptors.

G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) are a superfamily of cell-surface receptors that regulate a variety of cell functions by responding to a myriad of ligands. The magnitude of the response elicited by a ligand is dictated by the level of receptor available at the plasma membrane. GPCR expression levels at the cell surface are a balance of three highly regulated, dynamic intracellular trafficking processes, namely export, internalization and degradation. This review will cover recent advances in understanding the mechanism underlying GPCR export trafficking by focusing on specific motifs required for ER export and the role of the Ras-like Rab1 GTPase and glycosylation in regulating ER-Golgi-cell-surface transport. The manifestation of diseases due to the disruption of GPCR export is also discussed.

Amino Acid Motifs↗
PubMed2006

Asn229 in the third helix of VPAC1 receptor is essential for receptor activation but not for receptor phosphorylation and internalization: comparison with Asn216 in VPAC2 receptor.

After stimulation with agonist, G protein coupled receptors (GPCR) undergo conformational changes that allow activation of G proteins to transduce the signal, followed by phosphorylation by kinases and arrestin binding to promote receptor internalization. Actual paradigm, based on a study of GPCR-A/rhodopsin family, suggests that a network of interactions between conserved residues located in transmembrane (TM) domains (mainly TM3, TM6 and TM7) is involved in the molecular switch leading to GPCR activation. We evaluated in CHO cells expressing the VPAC(1) receptor the role of the third transmembrane helix in agonist signalling by point mutation into Ala of the residues highly conserved in the secretin-family of receptors: Y(224), N(229), F(230), W(232), E(236), G(237), Y(239), L(240). N(229)A VPAC(1) mutant was characterized by a decrease in both potency and efficacy of VIP stimulated adenylate cyclase activity, by the absence of agonist stimulated [Ca(2+)](i) increase, by a preserved receptor recognition of agonists and antagonist and by a preserved sensitivity to GTP suggesting the importance of that residue for efficient G protein activation. N(229)D mutant was not expressed at the membrane, and the N(229)Q with a conserved mutation was less affected than the A mutant. Agonist stimulated phosphorylation and internalization of N(229)A and N(229)Q VPAC(1) were unaffected. However, the re-expression of internalized mutant receptors, but not that of the wild type receptor, was rapidly reversed after VIP washing. Receptor phosphorylation, internalization and re-expression may be thus dissociated from G protein activation and linked to another active conformation that may influence its trafficking. Mutation of that conserved amino acid in VPAC(2) could be investigated only by a conservative mutation (N(216)Q) and led to a receptor with a low VIP stimulation of adenylate cyclase, receptor phosphorylation and internalization. This indicated the importance of the conserved N residue in the TM3 of that family of receptors.

Adenylyl Cyclases↗
PubMed2006

Differential effects of RGS proteins on G alpha(q) and G alpha(11) activity.

Heterotrimeric G proteins play a pivotal role in GPCR signalling; they link receptors to intracellular effectors and their inactivation by RGS proteins is a key factor in resetting the pathway following stimulation. The precise GPCR:G protein:RGS combination determines the nature and duration of the response. Investigating the activity of particular combinations is difficult in cells which contain multiples of each component. We have therefore utilised a previously characterised yeast system to express mammalian proteins in isolation. Human G alpha(q) and G alpha(11) spontaneously activated the yeast pheromone-response pathway by a mechanism which required the formation of G alpha-GTP. This provided an assay for the specific activity of human RGS proteins. RGS1, RGS2, RGS3 and RGS4 inhibited the spontaneous activity of both G alpha(q) and G alpha(11) but, in contrast, RGS5 and RGS16 were much less effective against G alpha(11) than G alpha(q). Interestingly, RGS2 and RGS3 were able to inhibit signalling from the constitutively active G alpha(q)QL/G alpha(11)QL mutants, confirming the GAP-independent activity of these RGS proteins. To determine if the RGS-G alpha specificity was maintained under conditions of GPCR stimulation, minor modifications to the C-terminus of G alpha(q)/G alpha(11) enabled coupling to an endogenous receptor. RGS2 and RGS3 were effective inhibitors of both G alpha subunits even at high levels of receptor stimulation, emphasising their GAP-independent activity. At low levels of stimulation RGS5 and RGS16 retained their differential G alpha activity, further highlighting that RGS proteins can discriminate between two very closely related G alpha subunits.

GTP-Binding Protein alpha Subunits, Gq-G11↗
PubMed2005

P-Rex1 regulates neutrophil function.

Rac GTPases regulate cytoskeletal structure, gene expression, and reactive oxygen species (ROS) production. Rac2-deficient neutrophils cannot chemotax, produce ROS, or degranulate upon G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) activation. Deficiency in PI3Kgamma, an upstream regulator of Rac, causes a similar phenotype. P-Rex1, a guanine-nucleotide exchange factor (GEF) for Rac, is believed to link GPCRs and PI3Kgamma to Rac-dependent neutrophil responses. We have investigated the functional importance of P-Rex1 by generating a P-Rex1(-/-) mouse. P-Rex1(-/-) mice are viable and healthy, with apparently normal leukocyte development, but with mild neutrophilia. In neutrophils from P-Rex1(-/-) mice, GPCR-dependent Rac2 activation is impaired, whereas Rac1 activation is less compromised. GPCR-dependent ROS formation is absent in lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-primed P-Rex1(-/-) neutrophils, but less affected in unprimed or TNFalpha-primed cells. Recruitment of P-Rex1(-/-) neutrophils to inflammatory sites is impaired. Surprisingly, chemotaxis of isolated neutrophils is only slightly reduced, with a mild defect in cell speed, but normal polarization and directionality. Secretion of azurophil granules is unaffected. In conclusion, P-Rex1 is an important regulator of neutrophil function by mediating a subset of Rac-dependent neutrophil responses. However, P-Rex1 is not an essential regulator of neutrophil chemotaxis and degranulation.

Actins↗
PubMed2006

G-protein-coupled receptor heterodimers: pharmacology, function and relevance to drug discovery.

The growing recognition that members of the rhodopsin-like family A G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) exist and function as dimers or higher-order oligomers, and that GPCR hetero-dimers and -oligomers are present in physiological tissues, offers novel opportunities for drug discovery. Differential pharmacology, function and regulation of GPCR hetero-dimers and -oligomers suggest means to selectively target GPCRs in different tissues and hint that the mechanism of function of several pharmacological agents might be different in vivo than anticipated from simple ligand-screening programmes that rely on heterologous expression of a single GPCR.

Animals↗
PubMed2004

Allosteric modulation of G-protein coupled receptors.

The superfamily of G-protein coupled receptors (GPCRs) has more than 1000 members and is the largest family of proteins in the body. GPCRs mediate signalling of stimuli as diverse as light, ions, small molecules, peptides and proteins and are the targets for many pharmaceuticals. Most GPCR ligands are believed to activate (agonists) or inhibit (competitive antagonists) receptor signalling by binding the receptor at the same site as the endogenous agonist, the orthosteric site. In contrast, allosteric ligands modulate receptor function by binding to different regions in the receptor, allosteric sites. In recent years, combinatorial chemistry and high throughput screening have helped identify several allosteric GPCR modulators with novel structures, several of which already have become valuable pharmacological tools and may be candidates for clinical testing in the near future. This mini review outlines the current status and perspectives of allosteric modulation of GPCR function with emphasis on the pharmacology of endogenous and synthesised modulators, their receptor interactions and the therapeutic prospects of allosteric ligands compared to orthosteric ligands.

Allosteric Regulation↗
PubMed2005

Ocular albinism 1 protein: trafficking and function when expressed in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

The ocular albinism 1 (Oa1) protein is believed to be involved in the biogenesis of melanosomes, but its cellular localization is controversial and its function is unknown. Based upon sequence homology, it has been predicted that Oa1 belongs to the G protein coupled receptor (GPCR) superfamily. We used the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae as a genetically amenable system to study the localization and function of Oa1. Sucrose gradient and immunofluorescence studies revealed that when expressed in yeast, Oa1 localizes to the prevacuolar compartment, the functional equivalent of the mammalian late endosome. Oa1 behaved as G protein coupled receptor in a yeast-based GPCR signalling assay. Extracts of cultured melanocytes, and, in particular, a particulate fraction from cultured melanocytes, stimulated Oa1-mediated GPCR signalling.

Cells, Cultured↗
PubMed2003

Regulation of G protein-coupled receptor endocytosis and trafficking by Rab GTPases.

G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) are integral membrane proteins that, in response to activation by extracellular stimuli, regulate intracellular second messenger levels via their coupling to heterotrimeric G proteins. GPCR activation also initiates a series of molecular events that leads to G protein-coupled receptor kinase-mediated receptor phosphorylation and the binding of beta-arrestin proteins to the intracellular face of the receptor. beta-Arrestin binding not only contributes to the G protein-uncoupling of GPCRs, but also mediates the targeting of many GPCRs for endocytosis in clathrin-coated pits. Several GPCRs internalize as a stable complex with beta-arrestin and the stability of this complex appears to regulate, at least in part, whether the receptors are dephosphorylated in early endosomes and recycled back to the cell surface as fully functional receptors, retained in early endosomes or targeted for degradation in lysosomes. More recently, it has become appreciated that the movement of GPCRs through functionally distinct intracellular membrane compartments is regulated by a variety of Rab GTPases and that the activity of these Rab GTPases may influence GPCR function. Moreover, it appears that GPCRs are not simply passive cargo molecules, but that GPCR activation may directly influence Rab GTPase activity and as such, GPCRs may directly control their own targeting between intracellular compartments. This review provides a synopsis of the current knowledge regarding the role of beta-arrestins and Rab GTPases in regulating the intracellular trafficking and function of GPCRs.

Animals↗
PubMed2005

Neuronal Kir3.1/Kir3.2a channels coupled to serotonin 1A and muscarinic m2 receptors are differentially modulated by the "short" RGS3 isoform.

"Regulators of G protein signaling" (RGS proteins) have profound effects on ion channels regulated by G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) signaling, including the G protein-gated inwardly rectifying K+ (GIRK) channels that inhibit excitability of neuronal, endocrine, and cardiac cells. Here we describe the effects of an alternatively spliced "short" RGS3 isoform (RGS3s) in comparison to RGS4, on the temporal and steady-state gating properties of neuronal GIRK channels (Kir3.1/Kir3.2a) activated by either serotonin 1A (5-HT(1A)) receptors or muscarinic m2 receptors expressed in Chinese hamster ovary (CHO-K1) cells. RGS3s is abundantly expressed in brain and contains a unique short N-terminus via alternative splicing that distinguishes it from other RGS3 isoforms as well as other members of the B/R4 RGS gene subfamily. Our results indicate that RGS3s and RGS4 similarly affect the temporal and steady-state gating properties of 5-HT(1A) receptor-coupled Kir3.1/Kir3.2a channels, but differentially modulate muscarinic m2 receptor-coupled channels. RGS3s caused a significant approximately 45% reduction in the maximal acetylcholine (ACh)-evoked GIRK current amplitude and a marked shift in the steady-state ACh dose-response relation indicative of a reduction in functionally coupled m2 receptor-GIRK channel complexes. Yet RGS3s still accelerated the m2 receptor-dependent GIRK activation, deactivation, and acute desensitization time course consistent with the RGS-enhanced GAP activity that was also observed with RGS4. Several mechanisms that may contribute to the receptor-dependent effects of RGS3s are discussed with particular attention to the role of the distinct N-terminal domain. Our findings highlight the potential impact of selective RGS-GPCR interactions on neuronal GIRK channel function that may affect the properties of inhibitory postsynaptic potentials activated by different GPCR-GIRK channel complexes.

Acetylcholine↗
PubMed2006

Recent advances in mammalian RFamide peptides: the discovery and functional analyses of PrRP, RFRPs and QRFP.

Since the first discovery of a peptide with RFamide structure at its C-terminus (i.e., an RFamide peptide) from an invertebrate in 1977, numerous studies on RFamide peptides have been conducted, and a variety have been identified in various phyla throughout the animal kingdom. The first reported mammalian RFamide peptides were neuropeptide FF (NPFF) and neuropeptide AF (NPAF) in 1985. However, for many years after this, no new novel RFamide peptides were identified in mammals. A breakthrough in discovering mammalian RFamide peptides was made possible by reverse pharmacology on the basis of orphan G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) research. The first report of an RFamide peptide identified from orphan GPCR research was prolactin (PRL)-releasing peptide (PrRP) in 1998. To date, a total of five RFamide peptide genes have been discovered in mammals. Orphan GPCR research has contributed considerably to the identification of these peptides and their receptor genes. This paper examines these mammalian RFamide peptides focusing especially on PrRP, RFamide-related peptides (RFRPs) and, the most recently identified, pyroglutamylated RFamide peptide (QRFP), the discovery of all of which the authors were at least partly involved in. We review here the strategies employed for the identification of these peptides and examine their characteristics, tissue distribution, receptors and functions.

Animals↗
PubMed2006

Thyrotropin-releasing hormone and its receptors--a hypothesis for binding and receptor activation.

Thyrotropin-releasing hormone (TRH), a tripeptide, exerts its biological effects through stimulation of cell-surface receptors, TRH-R, belonging to the superfamily of G protein-coupled receptors (GPCR). Because of the intermediate size of TRH, it is smaller than polypeptide ligands that interact at GPCR ectodomains and larger than biogenic amines, which interact within GPCR transmembrane domains (TMD), the TRH/TRH-R complex probably shares properties of these 2 extremes, representing a unique system to study GPCR/ligand interactions. In this review, we summarize the current knowledge of the structure-activity relationships in the TRH/TRH-R system. Based on experimental data and the structural information acquired from computer simulations, we formulate a working hypothesis to describe the molecular events underlying the processes of TRH binding and TRH-R activation. This hypothesis represents a starting point for understanding the biology of the TRH/TRH-R system on a molecular level and provides a basis for potential design of new potent and selective modulators of TRH-R's activity.

Animals↗