Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “GERIATRICS”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 397 records · Page 22Linked to original sources
PubMedDate not supplied

Incorporating geriatrics into baccalaureate nursing curricula: laying the groundwork with faculty development.

In June 2001, the John A. Hartford Foundation of New York awarded the American Association of Colleges of Nursing (AACN) a 3.99 million dollar grant to enhance gerontology curriculum development and new clinical experiences in 20 baccalaureate and 10 graduate schools of nursing. Over the 4-year grant implementation period, AACN learned a valuable lesson from the grant's site directors: Faculty development is the single most necessary precursor to the successful implementation and maintenance of geriatric curricular enhancements. Unless faculty members foster positive attitudes toward aging, expand their geriatric nursing knowledge base, and are able to integrate geriatric content into the curricula, progress cannot be made. Enhancing Geriatric Nursing Education project directors recommend that the following steps be taken toward the creation of successful faculty development activities: (1) anoint a champion to mentor and persuade faculty members to embrace gerontology; (2) garner faculty buy-in by engaging the faculty early so that they become active participants in the curricular change process; (3) assess faculty knowledge and comfort level by administering tools developed by the John A. Hartford Foundation Institute for Geriatric Nursing and by conducting surveys based on AACN geriatric core competencies; (4) conduct faculty development workshops that include cutting-edge knowledge and research and provide the faculty with opportunities to discuss feelings and stereotypes about aging; (5) elicit the dean's support to encourage and allow time and opportunities for training; and (6) use the many excellent resources that help the faculty integrate geriatric content into their courses. This article will further elucidate such strategies and will highlight the range of faculty development activities in which grant-funded schools engaged.

Attitude of Health Personnel↗
PubMed2003

Kaiser Permanente community partners project: improving geriatric care management practices.

This article describes a geriatric care management project that is testing whether geriatric care management plus a brief purchase of service (POS) intervention will lower medical costs, improve satisfaction with care, increase care plan adherence, and improve perceived quality of life. Kaiser Permanente members aged 65 and older who were eligible for geriatric care management and consented to participate in the study were randomized to one of four study groups: information and referral via mail, telephone care management, geriatric care management, or geriatric care management with POS capability. The POS intervention provides up to $2,000 of designated, paid services including in-home supportive services, transportation, respite, or medical equipment within the first 6 months of care management enrollment. Approximately 1,400 senior members were referred to the geriatric care management program, and 451 were randomly assigned to one of the four study groups. Those enrolled in the geriatric care management program were significantly more likely to be ethnic minorities and have lower income than the general Kaiser Permanente senior enrollment. Barriers encountered in implementing the POS intervention included establishing contractual agreements between Kaiser Permanente and private and community agencies, locating adequate and sufficient community agencies to provided needed services, monitoring service contracts, and delaying use of the POS benefit.

Aged↗
PubMed2005

Geriatric evaluation and management units in the care of the frail elderly cancer patient.

BACKGROUND: Geriatric assessment has been suggested as a possibly useful approach in dealing with frail elderly cancer patients. METHODS: This was a secondary subset analysis from a randomized 2 x 2 factorial trial in 11 Department of Veterans Affairs medical centers. Hospitalized, frail patients at least 65 years old, after stabilization of their acute illness, were randomized to receive care in a geriatric inpatient unit, a geriatric outpatient clinic, both, or neither. The interventions involved core teams that provided geriatric assessment and patient management. We identified 99 patients with a diagnosis of cancer by The International Classification of Diseases, 9th Revision (ICD-9) codes, excluding all nonmelanoma skin cancers. Outcomes collected at discharge, 6 months, and 1 year after randomization were survival, changes in health-related quality of life (using the Medical Outcomes Study 36-Item Short-Form general health survey [SF-36]), activities of daily living, physical performance, health service utilization, and costs. RESULTS: There was no effect on mortality (1-year survival 59.6%). The changes in the SF-36 scores from randomization for emotional limitation, mental health and bodily pain (also sustained at 1 year) on the SF-36 were better for geriatric inpatient care cancer patients at discharge. There was no difference in SF-36 scores between geriatric outpatient and usual outpatient care. Days of hospitalization and overall costs were equivalent for the interventions and usual care over the 1-year study. CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that inpatient geriatric assessment and management may be an effective approach to the management of pain and psychological status in the elderly cancer inpatient at no greater length of hospitalization or extra cost than usual care.

Activities of Daily Living↗
PubMed2003

Relating medical students' knowledge, attitudes, and experience to an interest in geriatric medicine.

PURPOSE: This study examined medical students' interest in geriatrics: Are knowledge, positive attitudes, and prior experience with older adults associated with an interest in geriatric medicine? DESIGN AND METHODS: Entering University of Michigan medical students completed three surveys: the Revised Facts on Aging Quiz, the University of California at Los Angeles Geriatric Attitudes Scale, and the Maxwell-Sullivan Attitudes Scale. The students were also asked questions about their prior experience with older adults and their interest in geriatric medicine. RESULTS: The results indicate that incoming medical students have minimal knowledge about aging, moderately positive attitudes toward older adults, and low interest in geriatric medicine. Having more positive attitudes toward older adults (ss =.28) and having cared for older persons prior to medical school (ss =.14) were associated with greater interest in geriatric medicine. IMPLICATIONS: These findings suggest that interventions to increase the number of geriatric-oriented physicians should focus on influencing learners' attitudes through experiences in the care of older adults.

Adult↗
PubMed1990

Geriatrics in residency programs.

To determine how well geriatrics has been integrated into residency training, the authors surveyed a random 33% sample of all the 378 family practice (n = 126) and 420 internal medicine (n = 140) training programs in the United States in 1988. All the programs responded. On average, the internal medicine programs had more geriatrics faculty than did the family practice faculty, but these numbers were insufficient to meet current or future needs. Fewer than half of the residencies had geriatrics inpatient or ambulatory-care evaluation units, geriatrics consult services, geropsychiatry wards, or geriatrics clinics available as training sites. In contrast, nursing homes were available for 93% of the family practice programs and 58% of the internal medicine programs. A total of 80% of the family practice programs but only 36% of the internal medicine programs had geriatrics curricula in place. The authors conclude that integration of geriatrics content into residency training is far from universal, largely because of a shortage of faculty and clinical training sites.

Curriculum↗
PubMed1982

Status of geriatric medicine in the United States.

Geriatrics has experienced a gradual and cyclical evolution in the United States. A considerable amount of attention has recently been focused on the status of geriatric medicine and the issue of specialty recognition. Numerous organizations within established medicine have developed position documents and are in the process of re-examining their status. In the United Kingdom, physicians can now be designated as having a special interest in geriatric medicine, and Canada is proceeding with the development of a certificate of special competence in geriatric medicine under the auspices of the Division of Medicine, Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons. This paper presents hypotheses to account for the lack of organization status in geriatrics, and arguments are examined regarding the need for specialty recognition. There is general consensus that geriatrics has an identifiable body of knowledge and skills and that there is need for a cadre of academic geriatricians and educators in geriatrics for students and residents. However, specialty recognition introduces conflict within established specialties that consider care of the elderly crucial to their existence. The options for special recognition, including a certificate of special competence, are described with their advantages and disadvantages. Substantial arguments favor some form of specialty recognition.

Aged↗
PubMed1988

Targeting the hospitalized elderly for geriatric consultation.

This empirical study reports the proportion of hospitalized elderly patients who were identified as frail. As a part of a randomized controlled trial, standardized criteria were developed to target the frail hospitalized elderly for geriatric consultation. Twelve-hundred patients aged 65 years and older admitted to the medical and surgical services at the Palo Alto Veterans Administration Medical Center were screened. Because of administrative exclusions of the randomized controlled trial (eg, short stay, lived too far away), 749 (62%) were excluded from the clinical screening process. The remaining 451 patients received clinical screening. Of these patients, almost two thirds (64%) were considered "too independent" to benefit from geriatric consultation (ie, independent in activities of daily living with short term illness), while 12% were judged "too impaired" to benefit (ie, had severe dementia or terminal cancer). Only 24% of those clinically screened (9% of the entire sample) were considered appropriate for geriatric consultation. Strikingly, over 42% of those patients aged 76 or older, were judged "too independent." These data suggest that a large majority of the hospitalized elderly may be too well to benefit from geriatric consultation, thus making targeting by age alone inefficient. A realistic estimate of the percentage of hospitalized patients appropriate for geriatric intervention lies somewhere between 18% (the combined percentage of those found appropriate and those already enrolled in geriatric programs) and 24% (the proportion of the clinically evaluated group found appropriate). Targeting of subjects may be accomplished inexpensively using the authors' explicit criteria. Such targeting may help focus the use of interdisciplinary geriatric expertise on those most in need.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Activities of Daily Living↗
PubMed1996

Controlled trial of a geriatric case-finding and liaison service in an emergency department.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effects of a program of case-finding and liaison service for older patients visiting the emergency department. DESIGN: Nonrandomized controlled trial with systematically assembled intervention cohort and matched control group. SETTING: An urban teaching hospital. PARTICIPANTS: There were 385 intervention subjects aged 65 years and older and 385 control subjects matched by day of visit, gender, and age within 5 years. INTERVENTIONS: Geriatric medical, dental and social problems were identified in intervention subjects by a geriatric nurse clinician using well validated assessment instruments during a 30-minute evaluation. Recommendations were made to the patient, family, and attending emergency department physician, and attempts were made to arrange appropriate follow-up services. MEASUREMENTS: Frequency with which geriatric problems were identified in intervention subjects; physician, patient, and family compliance with recommendations; and mortality, institutionalization, health status, use of medical and social services, presence of an advanced directive, and quality of life at 3-month follow-up. RESULTS: Sixty-seven percent of patients were dependent in at least one activity of daily living, 82% had at least one geriatric problem identified, and 77% reported at least one unmet dental or social support need. The cost of identifying geriatric and dental/social issues was $5 and $1, respectively, for each problem. Physicians compiled with 61.6% of suggestions, and patients and families complied with 36.6% of recommendations. Mortality and nursing home residence proportions at 3 months were not significantly different (9.3% vs 9.7% and 5.0% vs 2.5% in intervention and control groups, respectively). Intervention subjects reported more difficulty communicating (21% fair or poor ability vs 13%, P = 0.2) than did control subjects. There were strong trends for fewer subsequent visits to emergency departments (0.26 intervention vs 0.39 control, P = .06) and more advance directives in the intervention group (6.7% intervention vs 2.9% control, P = .07). There was no statistically or clinically significant difference in any other health outcome. The number of new dental or social services initiated per patient over the 3-month follow-up was nearly identical (1.7 in the intervention group vs 1.5 in the control). Results in subjects aged 75 years and older and those discharged home from the emergency department were essentially identical to those in the main group. CONCLUSIONS: Numerous previously unrecognized geriatric medical and social problems can be detected in older persons visiting the emergency department. Despite this, an emergency department-based geriatric assessment and management program failed to produce improved outcomes. This suggests that either disease acuity is an overwhelming factor in subsequent outcome or, alternatively, more control over medical and social service delivery during and after the emergency department visit than was demonstrated in this program will be required before successful outcomes can be assured.

Aged↗
PubMed1997

A geriatric consultation team in the emergency department.

BACKGROUND: The proportion and absolute number of older patients presenting to emergency departments (EDs) are increasing. Older ED patients tend to have multiple medical and psychosocial problems that make their care in the ED problematic. Despite this, there have been no previous descriptions of geriatric ED consultative services. SETTING: The Sir Mortimer B. Davis Jewish General Hospital is a 628-bed tertiary care McGill University teaching hospital. It serves a population of about 160,000, of which 23% are aged 65 and older. In response to the special needs of this group, the Division of Geriatric Medicine at the Jewish General Hospital has developed, among its clinical and teaching services, an ED consultation team. PROGRAM DESCRIPTION: The consultation team is composed of a geriatrician, a full-time nurse clinician, and part-time physical and occupational therapists. Consultations are received from referring, primarily Ed physicians and encompass all aspects of medical and psychosocial issues. Geriatric assessment is geared toward decision making for rapid disposition: discharge home or admission to acute geriatrics ward or other services. Thus, the service functions as a gatekeeper for admission to the acute geriatrics ward, as well as coordinating geriatric follow-up both in-hospital (for patients admitted to other services) and in the community (for patients discharged home), via the outpatient geriatric clinic, home visits, or linkage to other community resources.

Aged↗
PubMed1997

Geriatric rehabilitation: state of the art.

OBJECTIVES: To provide a clinically useful conceptual framework for the evaluation and treatment of disability in older persons, to review the rehabilitation of common conditions affecting function in older persons, and to discuss the effects of the ongoing changes in the healthcare system on geriatric rehabilitation. METHODS: MedLine search and review of relevant texts for information on (1) geriatric disability and its treatment, (2) recent high quality research, guidelines, and review articles relevant to the rehabilitation of conditions commonly causing geriatric disability, (3) effects of recent changes in the healthcare system on geriatric rehabilitation. RESULTS: Several pertinent models for geriatric disability were identified. These are explicated, along with information on the epidemiology of geriatric disability and its causes and relevant clinical applications. Rehabilitation is reviewed for musculoskeletal disorders, stroke and peripheral vascular disease, amputation, cardiopulmonary disorders, hip fracture, and deconditioning. Changes in the healthcare system appear to be affecting geriatric rehabilitation, especially the advent of managed care; relevant articles and opinions are reviewed, along with strategies to accommodate these changes. CONCLUSIONS: Our understanding of the causes of disability in the older population has improved significantly over the last decade. There has also been noteworthy progress in our knowledge about the effects of selected rehabilitation interventions, especially exercise-related interventions. However, the cost-effectiveness of many rehabilitative interventions remains unclear, particularly for differing patient groups across the continuum of care. More research will be needed to evaluate the effects of managed care on rehabilitation outcomes in older persons.

Aged↗
PubMed2000

Revisiting the one-year geriatric fellowship option: a preliminary assessment.

OBJECTIVE: To ascertain early opinions of geriatric fellowship program directors regarding the 1-year clinical training option. DESIGN: A brief mail survey of the 100 program directors listed in Graduate Medical Education, 1998-1999. MEASUREMENTS: Answers (favorable (+), no effect (0), or negative (-)) to questions regarding the effect on the training program, position of the director, and geriatrics as a discipline. RESULTS: This preliminary assessment produced decidedly mixed results. Seventy-six program directors responded (76% response rate). The clearest positive effect on the program itself was on the quantity of applicants (63% +, 4% -) but less so on their quality (33% +, 15% -). The clearest negative impact was on research aspects of the fellowship (0% +, 67%-). Other effects on the program were either null (clinical aspects and faculty morale) or moderately negative (educational, administrative, and financial aspects and the position of the program director), with few effects on the geriatrics division as a whole. Overall, the 1-year option was felt to have adversely affected geriatrics as a respected professional field (11% +, 41% -). Nevertheless, the majority (61%) answered that introduction of the 1-year option was wise. Although not attributed to this training pathway, program directors overwhelmingly perceived (75 % +) that geriatrics has enjoyed enhanced strength and attractiveness as a discipline since introduction of the 1-year option in 1992. CONCLUSIONS: The 1-year geriatric fellowship option has, at best, proved a mixed blessing to program directors. However, optimism regarding the future would seem to justify continuing to offer this option because of several observations and trends: (1) the increase in quantity and also perhaps quality of applicants; (2) growth in numbers of fellows and higher percentage program fill rates; (3) success of both 1- and two-year fellows in passing the Certificate of Added Qualifications examination and consequent increased generation of certified fellowship-trained geriatricians; (4) strong sentiment that geriatrics is gaining strength and attractiveness; and (5) that introduction of the 1-year option was wise.

Attitude↗
PubMed2004

Building academic geriatric capacity: an evaluation of the John A. Hartford Foundation Centers of Excellence initiative.

Almost 15 years ago, the John A. Hartford Foundation began its Centers of Excellence (CoE) program. In summer 2002, a quantitative and qualitative evaluation of the CoE program was conducted. The evaluation used previously collected quantitative data from surveys of program directors and graduates of fellowship programs, as well as interviews and surveys of currently funded CoEs. Since its inception, the CoE program has supported 163 geriatrics fellows, of whom 63% entered academic geriatrics. Almost half of these graduating fellows have gone to new academic institutions. CoEs have also supported 222 faculty, including some who were in disciplines other than geriatrics. The vast majority (82%) have remained in academics, and nearly two-thirds are currently in geriatrics. As the priorities and needs of the institutions and geriatrics programs changed, most centers shifted their CoE priorities. These changes predominantly took two forms: a refocus from one activity to another or an expansion of outreach or levels of support. Based upon this formal evaluation, the Hartford-supported CoE program has been successful in strengthening academic geriatrics, particularly in attracting, developing, and retaining geriatrics faculty.

California↗
PubMed2004

Return on educational investment in geriatrics training.

The graying of America will increase demand for specialists in geriatric medicine, but the proportion of filled fellowship positions in geriatric medicine has been falling recently. The objective of this study was to examine the financial return of additional training in geriatric medicine for general internists by using survey data from the American Medical Association and standard financial techniques. The return on educational investment over a working lifetime for a third-year resident in internal medicine who was considering specialty training in geriatric medicine between 1993 and 1999 was calculated. Physicians self-identified as geriatricians had lower incomes and lower incomes per hour than age-matched general internists, although the disparities decreased somewhat over the period examined. Regression modeling suggested that incomes for geriatricians are lower than expected and that this disparity increased in the last 2 years of the study. Some of the income disparities may be attributable to the fact that geriatricians obtain a greater proportion of their total revenue from Medicare than is optimal in the generalist setting. Returns on educational investment for geriatrics training were negative, although less so in recent years. Analysis suggests that the pursuit of additional specialty training in geriatric medicine has a negative financial return. Financial returns and the incentives they create should be carefully considered in meeting the anticipated geriatrics workforce needs of the nation.

Economics, Medical↗
PubMed2006

The Columbia Cooperative Aging Program: an interdisciplinary and interdepartmental approach to geriatric education for medical interns.

Although there is a critical need to prepare physicians to care for the growing population of older adults, many academic medical centers lack the geriatric-trained faculty and dedicated resources needed to support comprehensive residency training programs in geriatrics. Because of this challenge at Columbia University, the Columbia Cooperative Aging Program was developed to foster geriatric training for medical interns. For approximately 60 interns each year completing their month-long geriatric rotations, an integral part of this training now involves conducting comprehensive assessments with "well" older people, supervised by an interdisciplinary team of preceptors from various disciplines, including cardiology, internal medicine, occupational therapy, geriatric nursing, psychiatry, education, public health, social work, and medical anthropology. Interns explore individual behaviors and social supports that promote health in older people; older people's strengths, vulnerabilities, and risk for functional decline; and strategies for maintaining quality of life and independence. In addition, a structured "narrative medicine" writing assignment is used to promote the interns' reflections on the assessment process, the data gathered, and their clinical reasoning throughout. Preliminary measures of the program's effect have shown significant improvements in attitudes toward, and knowledge of, older adults as patients, as well as in interns' self-assessed clinical skills. For academic medical centers, where certified geriatric providers are scarce, this approach may be an effective model for fostering residency geriatric education among interns.

Aging↗
PubMed2005

Faculty development in geriatrics for clinician educators: a unique model for skills acquisition and academic achievement.

As the size of the aged American population increases, so too does the shortage of trained providers in geriatrics. Educational strategies to train physicians at all levels of experience within adult medical and surgical disciplines are needed to complement fellowship training, given the small size of most academic faculties in geriatrics. This article describes a unique faculty development program that creates geriatrically oriented faculty in multiple disciplines. The Boston University Center of Excellence in Geriatrics (COE), funded by the John A. Hartford Foundation, has trained 25 faculty members. Four to six scholars enter the program each year and participate in the COE 1 day per week. Nine months are spent in four content modules-Geriatrics Content, Clinical Teaching, Evidence-based Medicine, and Health Care Systems; 3 months are spent in supervised scholarly activities and clinical settings. A self-report questionnaire and a structured interview were used to evaluate the outcomes of participation in the COE. The results from the first 4 years of the program are reported. The response rate was 83% for the self-report questionnaire and 75% for the structured interview. The results indicate that the COE is effective in improving scholars' assessment and management of older patients. The structured interview revealed that the COE program promotes the integration of geriatrics into clinical teaching at the medical student and resident level. Participants also completed scholarly projects in geriatrics. This program effectively trains faculty scholars to better care for older adults and to teach others to do likewise.

Attitude of Health Personnel↗
PubMed2006

Being old and doing time: functional impairment and adverse experiences of geriatric female prisoners.

The number of older prisoners is increasing exponentially. For example, the number of geriatric female prisoners in California has increased 350% in the past decade. Despite an increasing population of geriatric female prisoners, the degree of functional impairment in this population is unknown. Therefore, the goals of this study were to describe the prevalence and nature of functional impairment in geriatric female prisoners in California and to identify aspects of the prison environment that may exacerbate functional impairments. Questionnaires were analyzed from 120 geriatric women in California state prisons. Functional impairment was defined as impairment in activities of daily living (ADLs) or in prison ADLs (PADLs), including dropping to the floor for alarms, standing for count, getting to meals, hearing orders, and climbing onto the top bunk. The mean age of participants was 62; 16% were dependent in one ADL, and 69% reported one PADL impairment. Increasing severity of functional impairment was associated with worse health status and more adverse prison experiences. For example, fall rates ranged from 33% in women without impairment to 57% with PADL impairment to 63% with ADL dependence (P=.02). Several prison environmental stressors were identified that likely exacerbate functional impairment. For example, 29% of geriatric women were assigned to a top bunk. Geriatric female prisoners report high rates of functional impairment. ADL and PADL impairment were associated with worse health status and adverse prison experiences. Therefore, the evaluation of functional impairment in geriatric female prisoners needs to consider the unique demands of the prison environment.

Activities of Daily Living↗
PubMed2005

Neuropsychological differences between late-onset and recurrent geriatric major depression.

OBJECTIVE: Executive dysfunction, possibly related to vascular pathology, has been well documented in patients with a first episode of major depressive disorder in later life (late-onset geriatric major depression). However, it is unclear whether the neuropsychological presentation differs in patients with a lifetime history of major depressive disorder (recurrent geriatric major depressive disorder). The purpose of this study was to explore differences in neuropsychological function, symptoms, and cardiovascular comorbidity between patients with late-onset and recurrent geriatric major depression. METHOD: The study used a two-by-two factorial design in which one factor was current major depressive disorder (present versus absent) and the second factor was lifetime history of depression (present versus absent). Neuropsychological measures of executive functioning and episodic memory, as well as psychopathological symptoms and comorbid medical illness, were examined in a total of 116 older adults. RESULTS: Patients with late-onset major depressive disorder showed specific deficits in attention and executive function, whereas patients with recurrent major depressive disorder exhibited deficits in episodic memory. The rates of anhedonia and comorbid cardiovascular illness were higher in patients with late-onset geriatric major depressive disorder. CONCLUSIONS: In contrast to recurrent geriatric major depressive disorder, late-onset major depressive disorder is characterized by specific deficits in tasks of attention and executive function, consistent with increased anhedonia and cardiovascular comorbidity. These findings, if confirmed, suggest that recurrent and late-onset geriatric major depressive disorder may represent distinct phenomenological entities. Such phenomenological differences as a function of lifetime history of major depression can guide research in the neurophysiology, prevention, and treatment of geriatric major depressive disorder.

Affective Symptoms↗
PubMed2006

Prevalence of potentially inappropriate medication use in elderly patients: comparison between general medical and geriatric wards.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Inappropriate drug use is one of the risk factors for adverse drug reactions in the elderly. We hypothesised that, in elderly patients, geriatricians are more aware of potentially inappropriate medications (PIMs) and may replace or stop PIMs more frequently compared with internists. We therefore evaluated and compared the prevalence of PIMs as well as anticholinergic drug use throughout hospital stay in elderly patients admitted to a medical or geriatric ward. METHODS: In this retrospective cross-sectional study, 800 patients aged > or =65 years admitted to a general medical or geriatric ward of a 700-bed teaching hospital in Switzerland during 2004 were included. PIMs were identified using the Beers criteria published in 2003. The prevalence of anticholinergic drug use was assessed based on drug lists published in the literature. RESULTS: The prevalence of use of PIMs that should generally be avoided was similar in medical and geriatric inpatients both at admission (16.0% vs 20.8%, respectively; p = 0.08) and at discharge (13.3% vs 15.9%, respectively; p = 0.31). In contrast to medical patients, the reduction in the prevalence of use of PIMs between admission and discharge in geriatric patients reached statistical significance (p < 0.05). Overall, the three most prevalent inappropriate drugs/drug classes were amiodarone, long-acting benzodiazepines and anticholinergic antispasmodics. At admission, the prevalence of use of PIMs related to a specific diagnosis was not significantly different between patients hospitalised to a medical or a geriatric ward (14.0% vs 17.5%, respectively; p = 0.17), as compared with the significant difference evident at hospital discharge (11.7% vs 23.7%, respectively; p < 0.001). This was largely because of a higher prescription rate of platelet aggregation inhibitors in combination with low-molecular-weight heparins and benzodiazepines in patients with a history of falls and syncope. The proportions of patients taking anticholinergic drugs in medical and geriatric patients at admission (13.0% vs 17.5%, respectively; p = 0.08) and discharge (12.2% vs 16.5%, respectively; p = 0.10) were similar. CONCLUSION: Inappropriate drug use as defined by the Beers criteria was common in both medical and geriatric inpatients. Compared with internists, geriatricians appear to be more aware of PIMs that should generally be avoided, but less aware of PIMs related to a specific diagnosis, and of the need to avoid anticholinergic drug use. However, the results of this study should be interpreted with caution because some of the drugs identified as potentially inappropriate may in fact be beneficial when the patient's clinical condition is taken into consideration.

Aged↗