Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “External Fixators”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 397 records · Page 22Linked to original sources
PubMed2006

Correction of neglected clubfoot using the Ilizarov external fixator.

BACKGROUND: This study was conducted to evaluate the corrective capability of the Ilizarov external fixator in the treatment of neglected clubfoot. METHODS: Thirty patients (38 feet) with a mean age of 19 (5 to 39) years with severe deformities and stiff feet associated with neglected clubfoot were studied. A limited soft-tissue dissection, Achilles tenotomy, and plantar fasciotomy were done. Progressive correction of the deformities was achieved through a standard setting of the Ilizarov external fixator. The device was used for 16 weeks, on average, and after removal a short-leg walking cast was used for an additional 6 weeks, followed by an ankle-foot orthosis (AFO) for 6 months. RESULTS: The final outcome was scored as good (complete correction and no pain); fair (partial correction with plantigrade foot and occasional pain); or poor (nonplantigrade foot and continuous pain during walking). After a mean followup of 58 (range 12 to 107) months, the results were good in 30 feet (78.9%); fair in three feet (7.9%); and poor in five feet (13.2%). Early complications were a distal tibial fracture in one foot, dislocation of the first metatarsophalangeal joint in one foot, and arterial damage that resulted in amputation of the toes in one foot. Recurrence of the deformity was found in 19 feet (50%): 11 minor, three mild, and five severe. Spontaneous ankylosis developed in 28 feet (73.7%). Nine feet (23.7%) required arthrodesis for symptomatic arthritis of the ankle or midfoot and deformity that could not be treated with orthoses. CONCLUSION: The Ilizarov external fixator allows simultaneous correction of all the severe foot deformities associated with neglected clubfoot with minimal surgery, reducing risks of cutaneous or neurovascular complications and avoiding excessive shortening of the foot. Even in those patients in whom final corrective arthrodesis is necessary, this may be carried out with minimal bone resection, since the severe deformities of the foot and ankle have been corrected.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2005

Temporary external fixation across the ankle after tibial nailing.

We describe the application of a temporary spanning external fixation device across the ankle in conjunction with intramedullary tibial nailing. This technique can be useful in selected patients with open fractures associated with severe soft-tissue trauma, skin grafts, or muscle flaps. The external fixator allows for wound access and keeps the foot and ankle in a neutral position preventing equinus. A brief period of rigid ankle immobilization is beneficial in preventing muscle motion and sheer stresses on flaps and skin grafts. The external fixator is removed at 3 to 6 weeks once the soft tissues have healed.

Aged↗
PubMed2003

External fixation of distal radial fractures: four compared with five pins: a randomized prospective study.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study of distal radial fractures was to compare the radiographic and clinical results after use of a standard four-pin external fixator with those after use of a five-pin fixator with the fifth pin stabilizing the distal radial articular fragment. METHODS: In an open prospective trial, fifty patients with an unstable distal radial fracture were randomized for treatment with closed reduction and either a standard small Association for the Study of Internal Fixation (ASIF) four-pin fixator (twenty-five patients) or a five-pin external fixator (twenty-five patients). The fixators were removed at nine weeks, and all patients were assessed radiographically and clinically at six months. RESULTS: Follow-up radiographs demonstrated significantly less loss of alignment and length with the five-pin external fixator. Pin site infections were more prevalent with the four-pin fixator. The range of motion of the wrist and forearm, the grip strength, and the Lidstrom functional ratings at six months were all significantly better after use of the five-pin fixator. CONCLUSIONS: The use of a five-pin external fixator, with the fifth pin stabilizing the distal radial articular fragment, yields better radiographic and functional results than does a four-pin fixator.

Adult↗
PubMed1999

Comparative biomechanics of hybrid external fixation.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the elastic stiffness, in several loading modes, of commercially available hybrid external fixation systems. DESIGN: Laboratory investigation using a polyvinylchloride pipe periarticular tibia fracture model. SETTING: Simulated periarticular fractures were created in an in vitro tibia fracture model. Instrumented specimens and intact controls were elastically tested in a biomaterials testing system. INTERVENTION: Groups of simulated periarticular tibia fractures were stabilized with one of six different hybrid external fixator designs. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: Elastic stiffness of each specimen was measured in compression, torsion, flexion bending, extension bending, and varus/valgus bending. RESULTS: Fixators with multiple levels of fixation in the periarticular fragment, regardless of design, were stiffer than those with one level. Specifically, the EBI Ring Connector fixator was stiffer than all others in all modes of testing. The Ace, Synthes, Smith & Nephew Richards, and How medica fixators were mechanically similar. The Zimmer Torus fixator was the least stiff fixator tested. CONCLUSIONS: Fixators with multiple levels of fixation in the periarticular fragment, regardless of design, were stiffer than those with one level. The choice of which hybrid external fixator to use should be made based not only on stiffness but also on ease of clinical application, patient comfort, customer support from the manufacturer, and cost. Clinical investigation of the efficacy of each of these devices is warranted.

Analysis of Variance↗
PubMed1983

Pitfalls in the management of open fractures with Hoffmann external fixation.

There have been many improvements made in external fixation, and fixators are being applied with renewed enthusiasm. Inspite of advances in design and application, complications related to the treatment of open fractures are still frequent. Although external fixation has dramatically improved the treatment of open fractures and made possible the salvage of previously amputated limbs, it is a complex technique with many pitfalls. These problems fall into two broad categories: those related to the application and maintenance of the pins and frame on one hand, and those related to the management of soft tissue and bony injuries on the other.

Amputation, Surgical↗
PubMed1999

[Temporary external fixation in the correction of non articular mal-unions of the distal radius].

PURPOSE OF THE STUDY: The authors reviewed 21 cases of extra articular malunions of the distal radius treated by osteotomy, temporary external fixation, then osteosynthesis. Two groups were studied: Group A of 14 patients with dorsal tilt of the distal radius and Group B of 7 patients with palmar tilt of the distal radius. Mean follow-up of this series was 69 months ranged from 12 to 109 months. MATERIAL AND METHODS: In Group A, after exposure of the distal radius through a dorsal approach, the site of osteotomy, proximal to the distal radio-ulnar joint, was determined by fluoroscopy. The angular correction was done by progressive opening using a small external fixator. After checking on the correction, the bone graft was harvested 7 times on the radius as described by Watson et Castle, 7 times on the iliac crest. Bone fixation was done by two K-wires and a cast for 8 to 10 weeks. Three Sauvé-Kapandji procedures was done at the same time. In Group B, the approach was palmar, extended distally to open the carpal tunnel. The distraction was done with a distal T-shaped external fixator. The bone graft was always harvested on the iliac crest. Bone fixation was done with a T-shaped palmar plate. Two Sauvé-Kapandji procedures was done at the same time. RESULTS: Group A: Flexion-extension arc was improved of 15.5 p. 100, pronation-supination of 83.7 p. 100 and grip strength of 80 per cent of the pre-operative values. Radiological evaluation showed good correction except one case of undercorrection of the dorsal tilt (-7 degrees) and one case of undercorrection of the radial inclination (+6 degrees). The distal radio-ulnar index was measured at the mean of 0mm postoperatively compared to +5 mm pre-operatively. One patient developed a postoperative radiocarpal arthritis. Group B: Flexion-extension arc was improved of 96.2 p. 100, pronation-supination of 76.9 p. 100 and grip strength of 108.3 p. 100 of the preoperative values. Radiological evaluation showed good correction except one case of overcorrection of the palmar tilt (-10 degrees) and one case of undercorrection of the radial inclination (+7 degrees). The distal radio-ulnar index was measured at the mean of 0mm postoperatively compared to +7 mm pre-operatively. DISCUSSION: The functional consequences of malunions of the distal radius have been stressed by others for more than sixty years. Since, many authors have contributed to refine and improve their surgical correction. Several displacements should be taked into account for the preoperative planning. They are sagittal tilt, frontal horizontalisation, shortening, sagittal and frontal translation, and axial rotation. Many types of osteotomies could be done; closing wedge, opening wedge or reorientation. In some cases, an operative procedure of the distal radio-ulnar joint should be done at the same time. We chose an opening-wedge osteotomy and the use of a temporary external fixator to ensure progressive distraction and good adjustment in the correction of angular deformities. In the dorsal tilt group we were satisfied in using on 7 patients a trapezoidal cortico-cancellous bone graft harvested on the radius. CONCLUSION: The authors would like to stress two points: The technical interest of using a temporary external fixator to adjust the angular correction of the distal radius. The importance of an adequate treatment of distal radius fractures in emergency situation, considering the functional and cosmetic alterations due to malunions and their need for surgical corrections in main instances.

Colles' Fracture↗
PubMed1995

[External fixation in fractures of the lower limb in children].

PURPOSE OF THE STUDY: The indications, morbidity and results of the use of external fixation for fractures of the lower limbs in children is presented. MATERIAL AND METHOD: We studied 72 fractures of the lower limbs (femur: 25; tibia: 47) in 63 children over a seventeen year period. Average age at fracture was 10 yrs 6 mos. (range 4 yrs 5 mos to 14 yrs 6 mos). Forty fractures were open fractures. The indication for external fixation was decided in three different situations: 39 isolated fractures, 11 patients with multiple fractures, and 13 polytraumatized patients. Three different devices were used: Illizarov: 4, Judet: 16, Orthofix: 52. The fixators were left in place until fracture union was demonstrable. RESULTS: Final results were classed into three groups: good, good following reoperation and sequelae. Comparison of the three different series was made using Student's T test. 9 axial deviations or malrotations occurred: 6 times correction was possible with the device in place. Three cases of osteomyelitis occurred at the fracture site. 23 pin tract infections occurred (23 per cent) 5 of which were persistent and 4 required reoperation. The average healing time was different in the three groups: 4.5 mos for isolated fractures: 8.1 mos for multiple fractures and 5.7 mos for polytraumatized patients. Reoperation was required for 4 patients: 2 bone grafts, 1 decortication, 1 bone transport. Ten refractures occurred following removal of the device, 8 times in patients presenting multiple injuries. In 46 patients with a follow-up greater than 18 months, 9 presented an overgrowth between 1 and 2 cm. Following an average follow-up of 2 years 4 months, 7 patients presented sequelae, 56 had good results, 18 following reoperation. DISCUSSION: The use of external fixation remains an irreplaceable method for osteosynthesis of open fractures with severe soft tissue injuries, multiple fractures or in the polytraumatized patient. Some disadvantages such as pin tract infections and refracture following device removal should be taken into consideration before using it for the treatment of simple, isolated closed fractures of the lower limbs in children. CONCLUSION: When external fixation is chosen for treating fractures, it is preferable to use a modular device which allows axial corrections. Local pin site care is essential to prevent early infection. Early weight bearing and dynamization as soon as possible will promote callus mineralization, removal of the device must be progressive and cast protection is recommended.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1997

Supracondylar fractures of the femur treated by external fixation.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the results and complications of treating supracondylar fractures of the femur with external fixation. DESIGN: Retrospective follow-up from the time of injury (inception cohort) to an average of thirty-one (range thirteen to seventy-two) months after injury. SETTING: Tertiary care university hospital. PATIENTS: All thirteen adult patients with supracondylar femur fractures treated with the method described were included. There were seven closed and five open fractures and five vascular injuries that required repair. Fractures were chosen for this technique on an individual basis by the treating surgeon. INTERVENTIONS: The femoral condyles were reduced percutaneously or via a medial arthrotomy and stabilized with 6.5-millimeter cannulated screws. Fixator pins were placed from lateral to medial in the condyles and in the shaft above the fracture. The monolateral fixator was applied laterally and stabilized the reduced condyles to the shaft. Initial grafts of bone were used in five fractures. External fixation time averaged 127 days. OUTCOME MEASURES: During treatment we determined the occurrence of complications at the pin sites and the fracture site, the time of healing, and the angular alignment at healing. At the latest follow-up we determined the range of motion of the knee, knee stability, a standardized knee score, and on radiographs the occurrence of arthrosis. RESULTS: Twelve fractures healed primarily. One patient had a fracture site infection and required further treatment before healing. Knee flexion was restricted while in the fixator but rapidly recovered after frame removal. At follow-up (average thirty-one months), the range of knee flexion averaged 111 degrees (range sixty-five to 140). The Iowa Knee Score averaged 87 points (range 75-93 points). Four femurs healed with angular malalignments, shortening, or both. Twelve knees had no detectable arthrosis. CONCLUSIONS: We concluded that in select supracondylar femur fractures, monolateral external fixation is a satisfactory treatment alternative.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1994

External fixation in war trauma management of the extremities--experience from the war in Croatia.

During 18 months, the authors treated 109 wounded patients whose complicated gunshot fractures were externally fixated. The total of 116 external fixators were applied. Besides bone fractures, blood vessels, nerve, and soft-tissue injuries required additional reconstructive procedures. The most frequent complications were infection of the tissue surrounding pins (35.34%), osteomalacia around the pins (18.10%) and osteomyelitis (7.70%). In 25 patients (21.55%) the external fixation was removed after the treatment of fractures. In eight wounded patients (6.89%) surgery had to be repeated to correct the inadequate position of bone fragments.

Croatia↗
PubMed2004

Three-dimensional load measurements in an external fixator.

On the basis of a six-degree-of-freedom adjustable fracture reduction hexapod external fixator, a system which can be used for measuring axial and shear forces as well as torsion and bending moments in the fixator in vivo was developed. In a pilot study on 9 patients (7 fresh fractures and 2 osteotomies of the tibia), the load in the fixator during the healing process was measured after 2, 4, 8 and 12 weeks and at fixator removal. The measured values enabled both the type of fracture to be determined as well as the monitoring of the healing process. In well-reduced type A3 fractures small axial (direction of the bone axis) forces were found in the fixator. A2, B2 and C3 fractures showed distinct axial forces, which decreased during the healing process, according to an increasing load transfer over the bone. Bending moments in the fixator showed good correspondence with the clinical healing process, except in the case of a C3 fracture. A combination of bending moment and axial force proved to be particularly suitable to assess fracture healing. In transverse fractures, the well-known resorption phenomenon of bone in the fracture gap at approximately 4 weeks was detected by the system. Compared with other external fixator load measurements in vivo, the hexapod offers the advantage of being able to measure all forces and moments in the fixator separately and with a relatively simple mechanical arrangement. In our opinion, it will be possible to control fracture healing using this system, thereby minimizing radiation exposure from radiographs. Furthermore, the measurement system is a step towards the development of external fixator systems that enable automatic adjustments of the callus mechanical situation ("automatic dynamization") and inform the patients about the optimal weight bearing of their extremity ("intelligent fixator").

Equipment Design↗
PubMed1997

Modern trends for external fixation of fractures in children: a critical review.

There is considerable controversy about the use of external fixation to manage children's fractures. The indications for external fixation are examined in the light of the available evidence in the literature. A general overview of surgical considerations, including the type of fixator, pin placement, and duration of treatment, is given with an assessment of possible complications. External fixation offers a safe and effective management option and may perhaps be the subject of randomized controlled trials in the future.

Child↗
PubMed1995

Use of rigid external fixation in fractures of the mandibular condyle.

In this article the use of a rigid external fixation system is proposed for the early treatment of condylar fractures. This method offers the advantage of not damaging the articular structures during reduction and allows early mobilization for a rapid recovery. In our Centre 28 patients have been treated with the rigid external fixation system, with good functional results. Of these 15 men and 13 women, 22 had a monocondylar fracture and 6 had a bicondylar fracture. In all the cases there was complete recovery of the occlusal stituation and of the mouth opening; no patient surgically treated with this method has ever presented problems of a local or general nature. The purpose of this report was to evaluate the use of external fixation for the treatment of extracapsular condylar fractures with luxation of the fragment out of the glenoid cavity.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1990

External fixation or plaster cast for severely displaced Colles' fractures? Prospective 1-year study of 46 patients.

In a prospective randomized study of 47 severely displaced Colles' fractures, 23 had external fixation and 24 had a dorsal plaster cast. Five fractures in the plaster-cast group redislocated and were externally fixed at rereduction after the 11-day follow-up. Three patients in the external-fixation group had a noncomplicated pin-tract infection, and 1 patient had a transient sensory disturbance arising from the cutaneous branch of the superficial radial nerve. After 1 year, the patients allocated to primary external fixation had a better radiographic and functional end result; according to Lidström's grading, 19/22 were excellent or good after external fixation as compared with 12/19 after plaster-cast treatment.

Adult↗
PubMed2005

Operative treatment of tibial fractures in children: are elastic stable intramedullary nails an improvement over external fixation?

BACKGROUND: Operative treatment of tibial fractures in children requires implants that do not violate open physes while maintaining tibial length and alignment. Both elastic stable intramedullary nails and external fixation can be utilized. We retrospectively reviewed our experience with these two techniques to determine if one is superior to the other. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the operative records and trauma registries of three institutions within our hospital system and identified thirty-five consecutive patients with open physes who had undergone operative treatment of a tibial fracture between April 1997 and June 2004. Four patients were excluded because they had been managed with locked intramedullary nails or with pins and plaster. Of the thirty-one remaining patients, sixteen had been managed with elastic stable intramedullary nails and fifteen had been managed with unilateral external fixation. The clinical and radiographic outcomes were compared. The functional outcomes were compared with use of the Pediatric Outcomes Data Collection Instrument. Complications related to treatment, such as malunion, delayed union, nonunion, infection, and the need for subsequent surgical treatment also were compared. RESULTS: Thirty-one patients with thirty-one operatively treated tibial fractures were available for evaluation. Fifteen patients had been managed with external fixation. Seven of these patients had a closed fracture, and eight had an open fracture. There were seven healing complications in this group, including two delayed unions, three nonunions, and two malunions. Sixteen patients had been managed with elastic stable intramedullary nailing. Eleven patients had a closed fracture, and five had an open fracture. The mean time to union for the intramedullary nailing group (seven weeks) was significantly shorter than that for the external fixation group (eighteen weeks) (p < 0.01). The functional outcomes for the intramedullary nailing group were significantly better than those for the external fixation group in the categories of pain, happiness, sports, and global function (the mean of the mean scores of the first four categories) (p < 0.01 for these comparisons). CONCLUSIONS: When surgical stabilization of tibial fractures in children is indicated, we believe that the preferred method of fixation is with elastic stable intramedullary nailing.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1989

Treatment of open fractures of the tibial shaft: Ender nailing versus external fixation. A randomized, prospective comparison.

A randomized, prospective study comparing Ender nailing with external fixation for open fractures of sixty-three tibiae (sixty patients) was undertaken. Ender nailing proved to be at least as effective as external fixation with respect to seven parameters: time to union, tibial alignment, total number of operations, ranges of motion of the knee and ankle, pain, presence of infection, and complications. Ender nailing is a safe alternative to external fixation for grade-I and grade-II open fractures. It should not be used for comminuted fractures, which might shorten about the nails.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1993

[External fixator of the cervical spine--a new diagnostic tool].

Soft tissue injuries of the neck may cause severe long-standing pain. The clinical findings are sparse and the identification of the painful segments with conventional diagnostic tools is often impossible. Temporary segmental external fixation for a soft tissue injury of the cervical spine was performed as a diagnostic procedure in 24 patients. The instrumentation was applied according to the established techniques of the insertion of facet screws in the cervical spine. The segments to be instrumented were evaluated by clinical and radiological findings, such as local pain and increased mobility in the functional X-rays. However, none of these findings were convincing enough to proceed directly to fusion for pain relief. Evaluation of external fixation consisted of alternatively fixing different instrumented segments and having the patients rate their pain on a visual analogue pain scale. External fixation of the suspected segments resulted in marked pain relief, which was recorded subjectively by the visual analogue pain scale in 68% of the patients. The pain relief (8.2 points preoperatively--2.6 points postoperatively on average) could be permanently established by successful fusion of these segments in 17 patients. Four of the patients indicated no relief of pain at the follow-up (12.9 months postoperatively). No fusion was performed in 3 patients in whom the diagnostic procedure with external fixation allowed no conclusion about the painful segment. As it is an invasive procedure, external fixation of the cervical spine should be reserved for cases, in which conventional methods have failed to established a clear diagnosis of segmental instability and conservative therapy could not relieve the symptoms.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Adolescent↗
PubMed2000

Simple anterior pelvic external fixation.

BACKGROUND: Unstable pelvic ring disruptions are often associated with significant morbidity and mortality, especially in patients with multiple injuries. Early pelvic fixation provides stability and should diminish ongoing hemorrhage. A simple anterior single-pin pelvic external fixator can be applied rapidly and accurately to stabilize pelvic ring injuries as a part of the initial patient resuscitation of such patients. Simple anterior pelvic external fixation (SAPEF) frames can be used as either temporary, definitive, or supplementary fixation depending on the pelvic injury pattern. METHODS: Over a 32-month period, 41 patients with unstable pelvic ring disruptions were stabilized using a simple anterior pelvic external fixator. Eight patients had open pelvic ring injuries and 13 others had genitourinary system disruptions. Fluoroscopic imaging was used to insert all of the fixation pins into the iliac crest between the iliac cortical tables to a depth of at least 5 cm. Each patient had closed manipulative reduction of the pelvic ring using external methods before SAPEF application. RESULTS: One patient died less than 24 hours after injury because of torrential hemorrhage. Clinical evaluations and serial radiographs, including postoperative computed tomographic scans, were available for the other 40 patients postoperatively. Seventy-five of the 80 (94%) pins were completely contained between the iliac cortical tables, according to the computed tomographic scans. The initial pelvic closed reductions were maintained until the fixators were removed in 37 of 40 patients (93%). Only one deep pin track infection developed, mandating early frame removal and intravenous antibiotic therapy. CONCLUSION: Simple anterior pelvic external fixation can be applied rapidly using fluoroscopic guidance to direct accurate pin insertion and closed manipulative reduction of the pelvis. Depending on the specific pelvic ring injury pattern and clinical scenario, SAPEF can serve as a resuscitative temporary fixation device, as definitive pelvic treatment, or as a supplement for pelvic internal fixation implants.

Adolescent↗