Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Clinical practice”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 397 records · Page 22Linked to original sources

A survey of clinical practices and readiness to adopt evidence-based practices: Dissemination research in an addiction treatment system.

Addiction research is challenged to disseminate evidence-based practices into routine clinical settings. The successful adoption of innovation must consider issues of fit, such as the characteristics, readiness, and attitudes of clinicians in the community. We constructed a survey to assess clinical practices and readiness to adopt certain evidence-based practices in addiction treatment programs. The instrument was administered to directors (n = 21) and clinicians (n = 89) from 24 public addiction treatment programs in New Hampshire (USA). Clinicians are more motivated to adopt some evidence-based practices (twelve-step facilitation, cognitive behavioral therapy, motivational interviewing, relapse prevention therapy) than others (contingency management, behavioral couples therapy, pharmacotherapies). Translational strategies for treatment development and research dissemination are discussed.

Adult↗

Role of conceptual models in a physical therapy curriculum: application of an integrated model of theory, research, and clinical practice.

The Department of Physical Therapy, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada, recently implemented a Master of Physical Therapy (MPT) entry-level degree program. As part of the curriculum design, two models were developed, a Model of Best Practice and the Clinical Decision-Making Model. Both models incorporate four key concepts of the new curriculum: 1) the concept that theory, research, and clinical practice are interdependent and inform each other; 2) the importance of client-centered practice; 3) the terminology and philosophical framework of the World Health Organization's International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health; and 4) the importance of evidence-based practice. In this article the general purposes of models for learning are described; the two models developed for the MPT program are described; and examples of their use with curriculum design and teaching are provided. Our experiences with both the development and use of models of practice have been positive. The models have provided both faculty and students with a simple, systematic structured framework to organize teaching and learning in the MPT program.

Biomedical Research↗

Golan memorial lecture. Nutritional regulation of immunity and infection: from epidemiology to phenomenology to clinical practice.

Malnutrition is the most common cause of acquired immune dysfunction worldwide. Nutritional deficiencies, excesses, and imbalances influence specific components of the immune system. The severity of immunological impairment depends upon the extent and nature of undernutrition, the presence of infection, and the age of onset of nutritional deprivation. Profound immunological changes occur in children with marasmus and kwashiorkor as well as in deficiencies of vitamins A, E, B6, folate, zinc, iron, copper, and selenium. On the other hand, obesity and excessive intake of several vitamins, minerals, cholesterol, and polyunsaturated fatty acids also impair immunocompetence. These epidemiological observations and immunological phenomena are of practical significance in clinical practice.

Humans↗

Clinical practice guidelines for the psychosocial care of adults with cancer.

Clinical practice guidelines are increasingly being developed in medical settings to provide evidence-based recommendations to guide the clinical care of patients. The development of Clinical practice guidelines for the psychosocial care of patients with medical illness is a newer initiative, and more complex as the target audience includes health care professionals from diverse backgrounds. In Australia, the National Breast Cancer Centre and National Cancer Control Initiative have collaborated to develop Clinical practice guidelines for the psychosocial care of adults with cancer, funded by the Australian Government Department of Health and Ageing. This paper outlines the development of these guidelines in the international context, gives an overview of their content, and describes strategies for their implementation and evaluation.

Adult↗

Research into practice: the reality of implementing a non-pharmacological breathlessness intervention into clinical practice.

The work of Corner and colleagues in the non-pharmacological management of breathlessness in patients with lung cancer has aroused considerable interest. Cancer and palliative care nurses are encouraged to incorporate the breathlessness intervention into their clinical practice but this has not always proved easy or straightforward. This paper draws on the authors' experience as lung cancer nurse specialists to explore some of the difficulties nurses in clinical practice may encounter when attempting to translate the research findings into their own areas and suggests ways these difficulties may be overcome.

Breathing Exercises↗

Knowing how to help tobacco users. Dentists' familiarity and compliance with the clinical practice guideline.

BACKGROUND: A U.S. Public Health Service-sponsored clinical practice guideline urges all health care providers to make tobacco-use cessation counseling a routine part of clinical practice. This study assessed practices of dentists in east Texas, their adherence to the guideline and barriers to adherence. METHODS: A cross-sectional survey mailed September 2003 through January 2004 assessed demographic characteristics and knowledge, attitudes and activities of 783 dentists. The survey focused on familiarity with the guideline, adherence to the recommended steps (including the "5 A's" for tobacco users willing to quit and the "5 R's" for tobacco users unwilling to quit), perceived barriers and time spent counseling. RESULTS: Most dentists were unfamiliar with the guideline and usually did not follow its recommended steps. Less than 20 percent of dentists spent three or more minutes per patient on counseling. Knowledge of and training in using the guideline were significantly associated with adherence and time spent counseling. Lack of training was cited as the greatest barrier. CONCLUSIONS: Most dentists in east Texas are unaware of the clinical practice guideline. Lack of training is a major barrier to adherence. Practice Implications. Opportunities for improving patients' health through brief counseling interventions are missed. Measures are needed to increase dentists' familiarity with and adherence to the guideline.

Adult↗

Why do clinicians sometimes find it difficult to use the results of systematic reviews in routine clinical practice?

Reviews of systematic results have proved enormously useful in routine clinical practice. However, the uncritical application of the overall results of systematic reviews to clinical decisions about individual patients can sometimes do more harm than good. Clinical syndromes are often complex, with considerable pathological heterogeneity, and the likely balance of the risks and benefits of interventions can be difficult to judge on an individual patient basis. Active involvement of experienced clinicians is essential in the planning, reporting, and interpretation of reviews. Detailed consideration should be given to the possibility of diagnostic or pathological heterogeneity within the clinical trials included in the review or between the trial patients and patients seen in routine clinical practice. For treatments that have significant risk of harm or treatments that are particularly costly, meta-analysis of individual patient data with stratification by baseline risk is sometimes helpful in targeting treatment appropriately in routine clinical practice.

Attitude of Health Personnel↗

[Implementation of guidelines for clinical practice in a surgical department].

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate implementation of clinical practice guidelines. DESIGN: Prospective evaluation study. SETTING: Department of Surgery. Academic Medical Center. University of Amsterdam, the Netherlands. METHODS: Clinical practice guidelines on patient care were developed by physicians working in the department of surgery. Six months after their introduction a selected, representative group of consecutive patients, admitted during 4 months, was followed by an independent investigator who determined compliance with a large number of guidelines. After this study period all physicians of the department were given oral and written feedback. This was followed by a period of two months during which compliance was determined again. RESULTS: In the first study period 226 patients were included. Compliance with most of the guidelines evaluated was over 70%. Compliance with the guidelines described in this article (antibiotic and thrombosis prophylaxis, use of urinary tract catheters and wound drains, diagnostics and therapy in symptomatic gallstones and distal obstruction icterus) ranged from 49% for the use of urinary tract catheters to 94% for thrombosis prophylaxis. In the second study period 106 patients were studied and no differences in compliance were found, except for the use of urinary tract catheters (from 49% to 73%). CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates that it is possible to introduce clinical practice guidelines in a surgical ward successfully and to reduce variation in patient care. Providing aggregated feedback is not sufficient to improve compliance with guidelines.

Algorithms↗

Nursing students learning to utilize nursing research in clinical practice.

The purpose of the study was to examine the significance of a learning assignment in relation to research skills and learning of nursing students in clinical practice. The learning assignment included an oral presentation of a nursing research article, which the students gave to their fellow students and ward nurses. The students also chaired the discussion after the presentation. The target group for the study was nursing students of a Finnish polytechnic who had been studying for 2-2 1/2 years and had accomplished a minimum of 120 ECTS credits of the total of 210 ECTS credits. When participating in the study, the students were completing a six-week clinical practice of optional studies. The data were collected with a questionnaire designed for the study. It consisted of six open-ended questions. Three of the questions were related to learning of research skills. Two questions were concerned with learning during the ongoing clinical practice. The final question inquired the students' views on the development of the learning assignment. The students received the questionnaire before the commencement of their clinical practice, and they returned it to the other researcher after their clinical practice. The questionnaire was given to 80 students, of which 50 returned it; the response rate was 63%. The data were analysed by content analysis question by question. According to the results, the learning assignment advanced the understanding of research concepts for the majority of the students. In particular, the students reported that the oral presentation clarified the research concepts, and the structure of a scientific article was also elucidated. The students stated that the assignment generated ideas concerning the development of nursing care. In relation to the ongoing clinical practice, the assignment advanced patient encounters and interaction, and bearing responsibility the most. Proposals for the further development of the learning assignment were expressed by more than half of the nursing students. Half of them suggested ensuring the interest in the topic from the ward.

Attitude of Health Personnel↗

Translating guidelines into practice. A systematic review of theoretic concepts, practical experience and research evidence in the adoption of clinical practice guidelines.

OBJECTIVE: To recommend effective strategies for implementing clinical practice guidelines (CPGs). DATA SOURCES: The Research and Development Resource Base in Continuing Medical Education, maintained by the University of Toronto, was searched, as was MEDLINE from January 1990 to June 1996, inclusive, with the use of the MeSH heading "practice guidelines" and relevant text words. STUDY SELECTION: Studies of CPG implementation strategies and reviews of such studies were selected. Randomized controlled trials and trials that objectively measured physicians' performance or health care outcomes were emphasized. DATA EXTRACTION: Articles were reviewed to determine the effect of various factors on the adoption of guidelines. DATA SYNTHESIS: The articles showed that CPG dissemination or implementation processes have mixed results. Variables that affect the adoption of guidelines include qualities of the guidelines, characteristics of the health care professional, characteristics of the practice setting, incentives, regulation and patient factors. Specific strategies fell into 2 categories: primary strategies involving mailing or publication of the actual guidelines and secondary interventional strategies to reinforce the guidelines. The interventions were shown to be weak (didactic, traditional continuing medical education and mailings), moderately effective (audit and feedback, especially concurrent, targeted to specific providers and delivered by peers or opinion leaders) and relatively strong (reminder systems, academic detailing and multiple interventions). CONCLUSIONS: The evidence shows serious deficiencies in the adoption of CPGs in practice. Future implementation strategies must overcome this failure through an understanding of the forces and variables influencing practice and through the use of methods that are practice- and community-based rather than didactic.

Clinical Trials as Topic↗

[Scientific evidence based medicine: myth and reality of variability in clinical practice and its impact on health outcomes].

Clinical practice is not an exact and reproducible phenomenon since it is carried out in a working framework with a high degree of uncertainty. The different sources of variability in clinical practice are analysed, with special emphasis placed on the quality of the scientific evidence that underlies decision making. On the basis of the change from the traditional model to a practice based on information derived from scientific evidence, different problems are examined in relation to the need for transforming the information into effective action. Finally, with the aim of reducing variability and its harmful impact on health, those areas that should be the object of future analysis and research are enumerated.

Clinical Competence↗

Attitudes about clinical practice guidelines in a mixed model HMO: the influence of physician and organizational characteristics.

OBJECTIVE: This study assesses physician attitudes toward clinical practice guidelines, in an organization where guidelines have long been incorporated into the clinical practice. Attitudes toward institutional guidelines and guidelines in general are explored, and are compared to a published study describing attitudes among a sample of American College of Physician (ACP) members. DESIGN: Descriptive study. SETTING: A large, mixed model HMO. SAMPLE: Two hundred and three internists and family practice physicians. MEASURES: Attitudes toward perceived compliance with clinical practice guidelines were assessed. Summary measures of attitudes and anticipated impact of guidelines were created. RESULTS: Overall, attitudes toward practice guidelines among HMO physicians were very positive. Differences were observed by gender, practice model, years in practice and residency training. HMO physicians on average held more favorable attitudes toward guidelines compared with published results of an ACP survey. While HMO physicians in independent group practices viewed the concept of guidelines less favorably than staff model physicians, they were more likely to view the impact of guidelines positively than were the ACP physicians. CONCLUSIONS: Exposure to practice guidelines in the context of clinical practice can lead to positive attitudes about those guidelines. While resentment toward a system which relies on practice supports such as guidelines may remain among some physicians, this need not be inconsistent with an appreciation of the potential value of guidelines for improving clinical quality.

Attitude of Health Personnel↗

HELEN, a modular framework for representing and implementing clinical practice guidelines.

OBJECTIVES: In order to implement clinical practice guidelines for the Department of Neonatology of the Heidelberg University Medical Center we developed a modular framework consisting of tools for authoring, browsing and executing encoded clinical practice guidelines (CPGs). METHODS: Based upon a comprehensive analysis of literature, we set up requirements for guideline representation systems. Additionally, we analyzed further aspects such as the critical appraisal and known bridges and barriers for implementing CPGs. Thereafter we went through an evolutionary spiral model to develop a comprehensive ontology. Within this model each cycle focuses on a certain topic of management and implementation of CPGs. RESULTS: In order to bring the resulting ontology into practice we developed a framework consisting of a tool for authoring, a server for web-based browsing, and an engine for the execution of certain elements of CPGs. Based upon this framework we encoded and implemented several CPGs in varying medical domains. CONCLUSIONS: This paper shall present a practical framework for both authors and implementers of CPGs. We have shown the fruitful combination of different knowledge representations such as narrative text and algorithm for implementing CPGs. Finally, we introduced a possible approach for the explicit adaptation of CPGs in order to provide institution-specific recommendations and to support sharing with other medical institutions.

Academic Medical Centers↗

[Evaluation of psychotherapy in clinical practice].

Empirical research on psychotherapies must be integrated into clinical practice. This is highly beneficial for both this research and the clinical practice itself. When research protocols are focused upon the everyday clinical problems and practice, filling up the corresponding scales or questionnaires does not appear any more as a tedious extra charge. Instruments are available which are based upon clinical usual approaches, and allow for reliable enough assessments of various and meaningful data (concerning symptoms, global health-sickness level, patient/therapist relationships, patients' involvement, etc....). Patients' and therapists' discourses can be analysed from tape recordings or from their responses to open-ended questions. Profiles of changes can be drawn, rather than unidimensional indexes of change. Naturalistic approach does not spoil the spontaneous clinical situation; but experimental settings are possible in some very precise circumstances. When a clinical staff decides to undertake such a research program, many institutional problems arise in an unusual way and thus can often be solved. Collectively filling up the questionnaires is frequently appreciated by the clinical staff. Patients usually appreciate to be questioned about their feelings and opinions concerning themselves and their treatment. However, if auto-evaluation brings highly worthwhile local benefits, the general conclusions of such empirical researches should be very cautiously discussed.

Follow-Up Studies↗

Clinical practice guideline: Otitis media with effusion.

The clinical practice guideline on otitis media with effusion (OME) provides evidence-based recommendations on diagnosing and managing OME in children. This is an update of the 1994 clinical practice guideline "Otitis Media With Effusion in Young Children," which was developed by the Agency for Healthcare Policy and Research (now the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality). In contrast to the earlier guideline, which was limited to children aged 1 to 3 years with no craniofacial or neurologic abnormalities or sensory deficits, the updated guideline applies to children aged 2 months through 12 years with or without developmental disabilities or underlying conditions that predispose to OME and its sequelae. The American Academy of Pediatrics, American Academy of Family Physicians, and American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery selected a subcommittee composed of experts in the fields of primary care, otolaryngology, infectious diseases, epidemiology, hearing, speech and language, and advanced practice nursing to revise the OME guideline. The subcommittee made a strong recommendation that clinicians use pneumatic otoscopy as the primary diagnostic method and distinguish OME from acute otitis media (AOM). The subcommittee made recommendations that clinicians should (1) document the laterality, duration of effusion, and presence and severity of associated symptoms at each assessment of the child with OME; (2) distinguish the child with OME who is at risk for speech, language, or learning problems from other children with OME and more promptly evaluate hearing, speech, language, and need for intervention in children at risk; and (3) manage the child with OME who is not at risk with watchful waiting for 3 months from the date of effusion onset (if known), or from the date of diagnosis (if onset is unknown). The subcommittee also made recommendations that (4) hearing testing be conducted when OME persists for 3 months or longer, or at any time that language delay, learning problems, or a significant hearing loss is suspected in a child with OME; (5) children with persistent OME who are not at risk should be reexamined at 3- to 6-month intervals until the effusion is no longer present, significant hearing loss is identified, or structural abnormalities of the eardrum or middle ear are suspected; and (6) when a child becomes a surgical candidate, tympanostomy tube insertion is the preferred initial procedure. Adenoidectomy should not be performed unless a distinct indication exists (nasal obstruction, chronic adenoiditis); repeat surgery consists of adenoidectomy plus myringotomy, with or without tube insertion. Tonsillectomy alone or myringotomy alone should not be used to treat OME. The subcommittee made negative recommendations that (1) population-based screening programs for OME not be performed in healthy, asymptomatic children and (2) antihistamines and decongestants are ineffective for OME and should not be used for treatment; antimicrobials and corticosteroids do not have long-term efficacy and should not be used for routine management. The subcommittee gave as options that (1) tympanometry can be used to confirm the diagnosis of OME and (2) when children with OME are referred by the primary clinician for evaluation by an otolaryngologist, audiologist, or speech-language pathologist, the referring clinician should document the effusion duration and specific reason for referral (evaluation, surgery), and provide additional relevant information such as history of AOM and developmental status of the child. The subcommittee made no recommendations for (1) complementary and alternative medicine as a treatment for OME based on a lack of scientific evidence documenting efficacy and (2) allergy management as a treatment for OME based on insufficient evidence of therapeutic efficacy or a causal relationship between allergy and OME. Last, the panel compiled a list of research needs based on limitations of the evidence reviewed. The purpose of this guideline is to inform clinicians of evidence-based methods to identify methods to identify, monitor, and manage OME in children aged 2 months through 12 years. The guideline may not apply to children older than 12 years because OME is uncommon and the natural history is likely to differ from younger children who experience rapid developmental change. The target population includes children with or without developmental disabilities or underlying conditions that predispose to OME and its sequelae. The guideline is intended for use by providers of health care to children, including primary care and specialist physicians, nurses and nurse practitioners, physician assistants, audiologists, speech-language pathologists, and child development specialists. The guideline is applicable to any setting in which children with OME would be identified, monitored, or managed. This guideline is not intended as a sole source of guidance in evaluating children with OME. Rather, it is designed to assist primary care and other clinicians by providing an evidence-based framework for decision-making strategies. It is not intended to replace clinical judgment or establish a protocol for all children with this condition, and may not provide the only appropriate approach to diagnosing and managing this problem.

Acoustic Impedance Tests↗

Family physicians' attitudes about and use of clinical practice guidelines.

BACKGROUND: The use of clinical guidelines is one strategy intended to improve health care quality, rein in costs, and standardize medical practice. Clinical guideline development has been prodigious, while less effort has been expended on the guidelines' dissemination and implementation. This study examines family physician attitudes toward and perceived uses of clinical guidelines in practice. METHODS: A survey questionnaire was sent to 978 family physicians in Upstate New York to assess their confidence in clinical guidelines developed or endorsed by organizations and the perceived usefulness of such guidelines in practice. Descriptive analyses, chi-square tests, and comparison of means (one-way ANOVA) were conducted. RESULTS: After two mailings, the response rate was 43%. Most respondents perceived clinical guidelines as effective educational tools that should improve the quality of patient care, but were concerned about their potential regulatory intrusion into practice. Solo practitioners expressed more negative attitudes regarding clinical guidelines than physicians in non-solo practices. Respondents had greater confidence in clinical guidelines developed or endorsed by their professional society, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, the United States Preventive Services Task Force, and the National Institutes of Health, but less in those by insurance companies or state health departments. The reported adoption rate of clinical guidelines was low. The most preferred methods for adoption were continuing medical education and practice interventions. CONCLUSIONS: Family physicians found clinical guidelines to be valuable educational tools but were divided on their potential regulatory role. If clinical guidelines are to improve quality in practice, they must be more effectively disseminated and implemented. To broaden physicians' adoption of clinical guidelines, further research into dissemination and implementation methods is warranted, along with wider endorsement of guidelines by those whom family physicians trust.

Attitude of Health Personnel↗

Health policy issues and applications for evidence-based medicine and clinical practice guidelines.

Evidence-based medicine and clinical practice guidelines have become increasingly salient to the international health care community in the 1990s. Key issues in health policy in this period can be categorised as costs and access to care, quality of and satisfaction with care, accountability for value in health care, and public health and education. This paper presents a brief overview of evidence-based medicine and clinical practice guidelines and describes how they are likely to influence health policy. Evidence-based medicine focuses on the use of the best available clinical (efficacy) evidence to inform decisions about patient care; guidelines are statements systematically developed from efficacy and effectiveness research and clinical consensus for practitioners and patients to use in making decisions about appropriate care under different clinical circumstances. Both fields have developed methods for evaluating and synthesising available evidence about the outcomes of alternative health care interventions. They have clear implications for health policy analysts: greater reliance should be placed on scientific evidence, policy decisions should be derived systematically, and health care decisionmaking must allow for the active participation of health care providers, policy makers, and patients or their advocates. The methods and information generated from evidence-based guidelines efforts are critical inputs into health policy analysis and decision-making.

Decision Making↗