Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Cannabinoid Receptor Modulators”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 397 records · Page 22Linked to original sources
PubMed2004

Evidence for an interaction between CB1 cannabinoid and melanocortin MCR-4 receptors in regulating food intake.

Melanocortin receptor 4 (MCR4) and CB(1) cannabinoid receptors independently modulate food intake. Although an interaction between the cannabinoid and melanocortin systems has been found in recovery from hemorrhagic shock, the interaction between these systems in modulating food intake has not yet been examined. The present study had two primary purposes: 1) to examine whether the cannabinoid and melanocortin systems act independently or synergistically in suppressing food intake; and 2) to determine the relative position of the CB(1) receptors in the chain of control of food intake in relation to the melanocortin system. Rats were habituated to the test environment and injection procedure and then received intracerebroventicular injections of various combinations of the MCR4 receptor antagonist JKC-363, the CB(1) receptor agonist Delta(9)-tetrahydrocannabinol, the MCR4 receptor agonist alpha-MSH, or the cannabinoid CB(1) receptor antagonist SR 141716. Food intake and locomotor activity were then recorded for 120 min. When administrated alone, SR 141716 and alpha-MSH dose-dependently attenuated baseline feeding, whereas sub-anorectic doses of SR 141716 and alpha-MSH synergistically attenuated baseline feeding when combined. Delta(9)-Tetrahydrocannabinol-induced feeding was not blocked by alpha-MSH, whereas SR 141716 dose-dependently attenuated JKC-363-induced feeding. Locomotor activity was not significantly affected by any drug treatment, suggesting that the observed effects on feeding were not due to a nonspecific reduction in motivated behavior. These findings revealed a synergistic interaction between the cannabinoid and melanocortin systems in feeding behavior. These results further suggested that CB(1) receptors are located downstream from melanocortin receptors and CB(1) receptor signaling is necessary to prevent the melanocortin system from altering food intake.

Animals↗
PubMed2006

Neuromodulatory functions of the endocannabinoid system.

The endocannabinoid system (ECS) has recently emerged as an important neuromodulatory system in the brain. Several neuronal functions are under the control of the cannabinoid receptor type 1 (CB1 receptor) and of its endogenous lipid ligands (endocannabinoids). CB1 receptors are widely expressed in the brain and their expression pattern reflects the complexity and the variety of functions of the ECS in neuronal activity. In particular, CB1 receptors are present at different levels in several brain regions and in distinct neuronal subpopulations. Endocannabinoids were described to act as retrograde transmitters at synaptic level in many brain regions. Interestingly, the mechanisms governing endocannabinoid-controlled synaptic modulation can vary depending on the region and the neuronal circuit. At physiological and pathophysiological level, the ECS has recently been shown to play important regulatory roles in several brain processes, including the modulation of memory processing and the control of excessive neuronal activity. The discovery of the ECS represents a hallmark in neuroscience research, and the exploitation of its numerous physiological and pathophysiological functions is a promising avenue for therapeutic applications.

Animals↗
PubMed2006

The endocannabinoid system in ageing: a new target for drug development.

Endocannabinoids are a new class of lipids, which include amides, esters and ethers of long chain polyunsaturated fatty acids. Anandamide (N-arachidonoylethanolamine; AEA) and 2-arachidonoylglycerol are the main endogenous agonists of cannabinoid receptors able to mimic several pharmacological effects of Delta(9)-tetrahydrocannabinol, the active principle of Cannabis sativa preparations like hashish and marijuana. AEA is released "on demand" from membrane lipids, and its activity at the receptors is limited by cellular uptake followed by intracellular hydrolysis. Together with AEA and congeners, the proteins which bind, synthesize, transport and hydrolyze AEA form the "endocannabinoid system". Endogenous cannabinoids are present in the central nervous system and in peripheral tissues, suggesting a physiological role as broad spectrum modulators. This review summarizes the main features of the endocannabinoid system, and the latest advances on its involvement in ageing of central and peripheral cells. In addition, the therapeutic potential of recently developed drugs able to modulate the endocannabinoid tone for the treatment of ageing and age-related human pathologies will be reviewed.

Aging↗
PubMed2003

Retrograde signaling changes the venue of postsynaptic inhibition in rat substantia nigra.

Both endocannabinoids through cannabinoid receptor type I (CB1) receptors and dopamine through dopamine receptor type D1 receptors modulate postsynaptic inhibition in substantia nigra by changing GABA release from striatonigral terminals. By recording from visually identified pars compacta and pars reticulata neurons we searched for a possible co-release and interaction of endocannabinoids and dopamine. Depolarization of a neuron in pars reticulata or in pars compacta transiently suppressed evoked synaptic currents which were blocked by GABA(A) receptor antagonists (inhibitory postsynaptic currents [IPSCs]). This depolarization-induced suppression of inhibition (DSI) was abrogated by the cannabinoid CB1 receptor antagonist AM251 (1 microM). A correlation existed between the degree of DSI and the degree of reduction of evoked IPSCs by the CB1 receptor agonist WIN55,212-2 (1 microM). The cholinergic receptor agonist carbachol (0.5-5 microM) enhanced DSI, but suppression of spontaneous IPSCs was barely detectable pointing to the existence of GABA release sites without CB1 receptors. In dopamine, but not in GABAergic neurons DSI was enhanced by the dopamine D1 receptor antagonist SCH23390 (3-10 microM). Both the antagonist for CB1 receptors and the antagonist for dopamine D1 receptors enhanced or reduced, respectively, the amplitudes of evoked IPSCs. This tonic influence persisted if the receptor for the other ligand was blocked. We conclude that endocannabinoids and dopamine can be co-released. Retrograde signaling through endocannabinoids and dopamine changes inhibition independently from each other. Activation of dopamine D1 receptors emphasizes extrinsic inhibition and activation of CB1 receptors promotes intrinsic inhibition.

Animals↗
PubMed2003

D2 dopamine receptors modulate Galpha-subunit coupling of the CB1 cannabinoid receptor.

CB(1) cannabinoid (CB(1)) and D(2) dopamine (D(2)) receptors are known to couple to the G protein Galpha(i/o). It has been reported that concurrent activation of D(2) receptors and CB(1) receptors, in primary striatal neuronal culture, promotes functional CB(1) receptor coupling to Galpha(s) resulting in elevations in intracellular cyclic AMP levels. We now report that in the absence of D(2) receptors, acute activation of CB(1) receptors inhibits cyclic AMP accumulation, whereas the presence of D(2) receptors promotes CB(1)-stimulated cAMP accumulation, presumably through Galpha(s). This Galpha(s) subunit switching was not prevented by pertussis toxin treatment and occurred in the presence and absence of D(2) receptor activation. Thus, coexpression of the D(2) receptor with the CB(1) receptor was sufficient to switch the coupling of the CB(1) receptors from Galpha(i/o) to Galpha(s). Persistent activation of D(2) receptors resulted in heterologous sensitization of adenylate cyclase to subsequent stimulation by forskolin, whereas the persistent activation of CB(1) receptors did not. Additional studies in human embryonic kidney cells cotransfected with D(2) and CB(1) receptors revealed that persistent activation (18 h) of D(2) receptors induced a switch of CB(1) receptor coupling from Galpha(s) to Galpha(i/o). This D(2) receptor-induced effect allowed for CB(1) receptor-mediated inhibition of cyclic AMP accumulation. The present studies suggest D(2) receptors may have a significant modulatory role in determining the G protein coupling specificity of CB(1) receptors.

Cells, Cultured↗
PubMed2005

Further advances in the synthesis of endocannabinoid-related ligands.

Recent advances in the synthesis of endocannabinoid-related ligands for the period 2001-2004 are covered in this review. During this period the first solid phase synthesis of anandamide (AEA) analogs was developed, which allows modification at both the head group and the end pentyl chain. Synthesis of water-soluble prodrugs of noladin ether was reported, which are chemically stable, rapidly release noladin ether under enzymatic conditions and are shown to reduce intraocular pressure. The structure-activity relationships (SAR) of alkylcarbamic acid aryl esters and the discovery of potent archidonylsulfonyl derivatives as fatty acid amide hydrolase (FAAH) inhibitors are summarized. Recent synthetic developments in the controversial area of anandamide membrane transporter (AMT) inhibitors are also discussed.

Animals↗
PubMed2004

New perspectives in the studies on endocannabinoid and cannabis: a role for the endocannabinoid-arachidonic acid pathway in drug reward and long-lasting relapse to drug taking.

Growing evidence on the involvement of cannabinoids in the rewarding effects of various kinds of drugs of abuse has suggested that not only the classical dopaminergic and opioidergic, but also the most recently established endocannabinoid system is implicated in the brain reward system. Furthermore, the interplay between the three systems has been shown to be an essential neural substrate underlying many aspects of drug addiction including craving and relapse. Relapse, the resumption of drug taking following a period of drug abstinence, is considered the main hurdle in treating drug addiction. Yet, little is known about its underlying mechanisms. The link between the endocannabinoid system and the arachidonic cascade is currently being clarified. While several findings have, indeed, shown the essential role of the endocannabinoid system in the reinstatement model, the endocannabinoid-arachidonic acid pathway may also be an important part in the neural machinery underlying relapse. This evidence may provide an alternative approach that will open a novel strategy in combating drug addiction.

Amphetamine-Related Disorders↗
PubMed2006

The endocannabinoid system.

The endocannabinoid system is a complex physiologic system. One of the most important discoveries related to the endocannabinoid system is that cannabinoid-1 receptors are present throughout the body and that they are linked to obesity and cardiometabolic risk. Adipose tissue was historically thought to be an inert, passive storage vehicle. However, recent findings prove that adipose tissue is a complex endocrine organ that releases adipokines, which influence cardiometabolic risk factors. Elevated endocannabinoid system activity is associated with obesity and coupled with excessive food intake and fat accumulation. Strong evidence suggests that the endocannabinoid system affects the surrogate cardiometabolic end points that greatly influence morbidity and mortality.

Animals↗
PubMed2003

Microinjection of a cannabinoid receptor antagonist into the NTS increases baroreflex duration in dogs.

Baroreceptor afferent fibers synapse in the nucleus tractus solitarius (NTS) of the medulla. Neuronal cannabinoid (CB)(1) receptors are expressed in the NTS and central administration of CB(1) receptor agonists affect blood pressure (BP) and heart rate. In addition, there is evidence that endocannabinoids are produced in the brain stem. This study examined whether changes in CB(1) receptor activity in the NTS modulated the baroreceptor reflex, contributing to changes seen in BP and heart rate. Baroreflexes were evoked in anesthetized dogs by pressure ramp stimulations of the isolated carotid sinus before and after microinjection of CB(1) receptor agonist WIN-55212-2 (1.25-1.50 pmol) or antagonist SR-141716 (2.5-3.0 pmol) into cardiovascular regions of the NTS. Microinjection of the SR-141716 did not affect baseline BP or baroreflex sensitivity. However, SR-141716 significantly prolonged the time needed to return to the baseline level of BP after the pressure ramp. Microinjection of WIN-55212-2 had no effect on the baroreflex. These data suggest that endocannabinoids can modulate the excitability of NTS neurons involved in the baroreceptor reflex, leading to modulation of baroreflex regulation.

Analgesics↗
PubMed2005

The endocannabinoid system in the physiology and pathophysiology of the gastrointestinal tract.

Numerous investigations have recently demonstrated the important roles of the endocannabinoid system in the gastrointestinal (GI) tract under physiological and pathophysiological conditions. In the GI tract, cannabinoid type 1 (CB1) receptors are present in neurons of the enteric nervous system and in sensory terminals of vagal and spinal neurons, while cannabinoid type 2 receptors are located in immune cells. Activation of CB1 receptors was shown to modulate several functions in the GI tract, including gastric secretion, gastric emptying and intestinal motility. Under pathophysiological conditions induced experimentally in rodents, the endocannabinoid system conveys protection to the GI tract (e.g. from inflammation and abnormally high gastric and enteric secretions). Such protective activities are largely in agreement with anecdotal reports from folk medicine on the use of Cannabis sativa extracts by subjects suffering from various GI disorders. Thus, the endocannabinoid system may serve as a potentially promising therapeutic target against different GI disorders, including frankly inflammatory bowel diseases (e.g. Crohn's disease), functional bowel diseases (e.g. irritable bowel syndrome) and secretion- and motility-related disorders. As stimulation of this modulatory system by CB1 receptor agonists can lead to unwanted psychotropic side effects, an alternative and promising avenue for therapeutic applications resides in the treatment with CB1 receptor agonists that are unable to cross the blood-brain barrier, or with compounds that inhibit the degradation of endogenous ligands (endocannabinoids) of CB1 receptors, hence prolonging the activity of the endocannabinoid system.

Animals↗
PubMed2003

Anandamide and vanilloid TRPV1 receptors.

A large body of evidence now exists to substantiate that the endocannabinoid, anandamide, activates TRPV1 receptors. It is a low intrinsic efficacy TRPV1 agonist that behaves as a partial agonist in tissues with a low receptor reserve, while in tissues with high receptor reserve and in circumstances associated with certain disease states, it behaves as a full agonist. The efficacy of anandamide as a TRPV1 agonist is influenced by a succession of factors including receptor reserve, phosphorylation, metabolism and uptake, CB1 receptor activation, voltage, temperature, pH and bovine serum albumin. There are indications that the endocannabinoid system may play a role in the modulation of TRPV1 receptor activation. The activation of TRPV1 receptors by anandamide has potential implications in the treatment of inflammatory, respiratory and cardiovascular disorders. The relative importance of anandamide as a physiological and/or pathophysiological TRPV1 receptor agonist in comparison to other potential candidates has yet to be revealed.

Animals↗
PubMed2005

The endocannabinoid system and the treatment of obesity.

The endocannabinoids are endogenous lipids capable of binding to both cannabinoid receptors (CB) CB1 and CB2. These receptors belong to the G protein-coupled family receptors and they were discovered while investigating the mode of action of ?(9)-tetrahydrocannabinol, a component of Cannabis sativa, to which they bind with high affinity. Among many other brain sites, CB1 is present in the hypothalamic nuclei involved in the control of energy balance and body weight, as well as in neurons of the mesolimbic system which is believed to mediate the incentive value of food. At central nervous system level, CB1 activation is necessary to induce food intake after a short period of food deprivation, and when CB1 is activated by endocannabinoids produced in situ, a stimulation of the ingestion of palatable food has been described. CB1 stimulation leads to modulation of the release of some hypothalamic anorexigenic and orexigenic mediators, as well as of dopamine in the nucleus accumbens shell. Recent evidence has proved that CB1 is also present in the peripheral organs, such as the adipose tissue and gastrointestinal system, key organs in the regulation of energy metabolism. Animal models have provided solid evidence that genetically induced obesity leads to long-lasting overstimulation of endocannabinoid system synthesis resulting in permanent overactivation of CB1, which may then contribute to the maintenance of this disease. Importantly, at peripheral level, CB1 activation has been shown to stimulate lipogenesis in adipocytes. CB1 blockers increase adiponectin production in adipocytes, which leads to increased fatty acid oxidation and free fatty acid clearance. Moreover, CB1 has been shown to be up-regulated in adipocytes derived from obese rodents. These results support the role of endocannabinoids in the development and maintenance of obesity, paving the way for the development of a new class of drugs such as the CB1 blockers as a therapy for tackling obesity and the associated major cardiovascular risk factors.

Adipocytes↗
PubMed2004

Involvement of cannabinoid receptors in gut motility and visceral perception.

From a historical perspective to the present day, all the evidence suggests that activation of cannabinoid receptors (CBRs) is beneficial for gut discomfort and pain, which are symptoms related to dysmotility and visceral perception. CBRs comprise G-protein coupled receptors that are predominantly in enteric and central neurones (CB1R) and immune cells (CB2R). In the last decade, evidence obtained from the use of selective agonists and inverse agonists/antagonists indicates that manipulation of CB1R can alter (1) sensory processing from the gut, (2) brain integration of brain-gut axis, (3) extrinsic control of the gut and (4) intrinsic control by the enteric nervous system. The extent to which activation of CB1R is most critical at these different levels is related to the region of the GI tract. The upper GI tract is strongly influenced by CB1R activation on central vagal pathways, whereas intestinal peristalsis can be modified by CB1R activation in the absence of extrinsic input. Actions at multiple levels make the CB1R a target for the treatment of functional bowel disorders, such as IBS. Since low-grade inflammation may act as a trigger for occurrence of IBS, CB2R modulation could be beneficial, but there is little supporting evidence for this yet. The challenge is to accomplish CBR activation while minimizing adverse effects and abuse liabilities. Potential therapeutic strategies involve increasing signaling by endocannabinoids (EC). The pathways involved in the biosynthesis, uptake and degradation of EC provide opportunities for modulation of CB1R and some recent evidence with inhibitors of EC uptake and metabolism suggest that these could be exploited for therapeutic gain.

Animals↗
PubMed2005

Synergistic interactions between cannabinoids and environmental stress in the activation of the central amygdala.

Anxiety and panic are the most common adverse effects of cannabis intoxication; reactions potentiated by stress. Data suggest that cannabinoid (CB1) receptor modulation of amygdalar activity contributes to these phenomena. Using Fos as a marker, we tested the hypothesis that environmental stress and CB1 cannabinoid receptor activity interact in the regulation of amygdalar activation in male mice. Both 30 min of restraint and CB1 receptor agonist treatment (Delta9-tetrahydrocannabinol (2.5 mg/kg) or CP55940 (0.3 mg/kg); by i.p. injection) produced barely detectable increases in Fos expression within the central amygdala (CeA). However, the combination of restraint and CB1 agonist administration produced robust Fos induction within the CeA, indicating a synergistic interaction between environmental stress and CB1 receptor activation. An inhibitor of endocannabinoid transport, AM404 (10 mg/kg), produced an additive interaction with restraint within the CeA. In contrast, fatty acid amide hydrolase (FAAH) inhibitor-treated mice (URB597, 1 mg/kg) and FAAH-/- mice did not exhibit any differences in amygdalar activation in response to restraint compared to control mice. In the basolateral (BLA) and medial amygdala, restraint stress produced a low level of Fos induction, which was unaffected by cannabinoid treatment. Interestingly, the CB1 receptor antagonist SR141716 dose-dependently increased Fos expression in the BLA and CeA. These data suggest the CeA is an important neural substrate subserving the interactions between cannabinoids and environmental stress, and could be relevant to understanding the context-dependent emotional and affective changes induced by marijuana intoxication and the role of endocannabinoid signaling in the modulation of amygdalar activity.

Amygdala↗
PubMed2002

Evidence for functional CB1 cannabinoid receptor expressed in the rat thyroid.

OBJECTIVE: Previous reports have shown that the Delta(9)-tetrahydrocannabinol (Delta(9)TCH), the major psychoactive cannabinoid components of marijuana, is able [corrected] to inhibit thyroid hormonal activity. The aim of this study was to characterize the CB1 functional expression in the rat thyroid by a multi-methods approach. METHODS AND RESULTS: RT-PCR was used to detect the mRNA expression of the CB1 cannabinoid receptor (17.8+/-4.0% of the normalizing reference gene beta(2) microglobulin), as well as the expression of the endocannabinoid hydrolyzing enzyme, fatty acid amide hydrolase (46.9+/-4.3% of beta(2) microglobulin), in the rat thyroid gland. The CB1-encoded protein was detected in its glycosylated form (63 kDa) by Western blot, employing a polyclonal antibody, while CB1 immunohistochemical localization showed an intracellular positive staining in both follicular and parafollicular cells. In addition, a 30% decrease in serum levels of both 3,5,3' tri-iodothyronine (T(3)) and thyroxine (T(4)) was detected 4 h after the administration of the synthetic cannabinoid receptor agonist, WIN 55,212-2 (10 mg/kg i.p.). These effects were antagonized by pretreatment with the CB1 antagonist SR 141716A (3 mg/kg i.p.); thyrotrophin levels were unaffected by both treatments. CONCLUSION: These data indicate that functional CB1 receptors which are able to modulate the release of T(3) and T(4) are expressed in the rat thyroid, and suggest a possible role of cannabinoids in the regulation of rat thyroid hormonal activity.

Amidohydrolases↗
PubMed2006

Metabotropic suppression of excitation in murine autaptic hippocampal neurons.

Depolarization-induced suppression of excitation (DSE) and inhibition (DSI) are forms of short-term neuronal plasticity involving postsynaptic release of an endocannabinoid and the activation of presynaptic cannabinoid CB1 receptors. We have recently reported that CB1-dependent DSE can be elicited in autaptic cultures of excitatory hippocampal neurons of the mouse. We now report that the same preparation exhibits a parallel G(q)-coupled receptor-dependent production of endocannabinoids causing retrograde inhibition, also via CB1 receptors, which we will refer to as metabotropic suppression of excitation (MSE). We tested a spectrum of G(q)-coupled receptor agonists and found that both muscarinic and metabotropic glutamate receptors (group I) mediate retrograde inhibition via CB1 receptors in autaptic hippocampal neurons. Thus these neurons possess not only the pre- and postsynaptic machinery necessary for DSE but also that for MSE. This permitted a closer examination of MSE and its interaction with other aspects of the endocannabinoid retrograde signalling machinery: MSE mimics and occludes DSE and is itself occluded by the endocannabinoid 2-arachidonoyl glycerol (2-AG), consistent with 2-AG as a likely mediator of MSE. In contrast to DSE, MSE undergoes heterologous desensitization over the time course of minutes. In keeping with data reported for metabotropic suppression of inhibition (MSI) and DSI in the hippocampus, subthreshold MSE and DSE act synergistically. We additionally found that Delta9-tetrahydrocannabinol, which has been shown to attenuate DSE, antagonizes MSE. Finally, we have distinguished a neuronal subpopulation that exhibits DSE and a differential complement of MSE-mediating Gq-coupled receptors, making possible contrasting studies of MSE. Autaptic endocannabinoid signalling is rich, robust and complex in a deceptively simple package, including a previously unreported postsynaptic mechanism of adaptation in addition to known presynaptic CB1 desensitization. These adaptive sites offer novel targets for modulation of endogenous cannabinoid signalling.

Animals↗
PubMed2006

Differential effects of endocannabinoids on glutamatergic and GABAergic inputs to layer 5 pyramidal neurons.

Endocannabinoids are emerging as potent modulators of neuronal activity throughout the brain, and activation of the type-1 cannabinoid receptor (CB1R) reduces sensory-evoked cortical responses in vivo, presumably by decreasing excitatory transmission. In the neocortex, CB1R is differentially expressed across neocortical laminae, with highest levels of expression in layers 2/3 and 5. Although we have shown that cannabinoid signaling in layer 2/3 of somatosensory cortex targets both gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA) and glutamate release, the predominant effect is a net increase in pyramidal neuron (PN) activity due to disinhibition. The role of endocannabinoid signaling in layer 5, the main output layer of the neocortex, remains unknown. We found that inducing activity in layer 5 PNs resulted in endocannabinoid-mediated depolarization-induced suppression of excitation (DSE), whereas the majority of inhibitory inputs were cannabinoid insensitive. Furthermore, in contrast to layer 2/3, the net effect of elevations in action potential firing of layer 5 PNs was an endocannabinoid-mediated decrease in PN spike probability. Interestingly, excitatory synaptic currents in layer 5 evoked by intralaminar stimulation were cannabinoid sensitive, whereas inputs evoked from layer 2/3 were insensitive, suggesting specificity of cannabinoid signaling across glutamatergic inputs. Thus, cannabinoids have differential effects on excitation and inhibition across cortical layers, and endocannabinoid signaling in layer 5 may serve to selectively decrease the efficacy of a subset of excitatory inputs.

Animals↗
PubMed2005

GABAB and CB1 cannabinoid receptor expression identifies two types of septal cholinergic neurons.

Septohippocampal cholinergic neurons play key roles in learning and memory processes, and in the generation of hippocampal theta rhythm. The range of receptors for endogenous modulators expressed on these neurons is unclear. Here we describe GABA(B) 1a/b receptor (GABA(B)R) and type 1 cannabinoid receptor (CB(1)R) expression in rat septal cholinergic [i.e. choline acetyltransferase (ChAT)-positive] cells. Using double immunofluorescent staining, we found that almost two-thirds of the cholinergic cells in the rat medial septum were GABA(B)R positive, and that these cells had significantly larger somata than did GABA(B)R-negative cholinergic neurons. We detected CB(1)R labelling in somata after axonal protein transport was blocked by colchicine. In these animals about one-third of the cholinergic cells were CB(1)R positive. These cells again had larger somata than CB(1)R-negative cholinergic neurons. The analyses confirmed that the size of GABA(B)R-positive and CB(1)R-positive cholinergic cells were alike, and all CB(1)R-positive cholinergic cells were GABA(B)R positive as well. CB(1)R-positive cells were invariably ChAT positive. All retrogradely labelled septohippocampal cholinergic cells were positive for GABA(B)R and at least half of them also for CB(1)R. These data shed light on the existence of at least two cholinergic cell types in the medial septum: one expresses GABA(B)R and CB(1)R, has large somata and projects to the hippocampus, whereas the other is negative for GABA(B)R and CB(1)R and has smaller somata. The results also suggest that cholinergic transmission in the hippocampus is fine-tuned by endocannabinoid signalling.

Acetylcholine↗