Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Advanced Cardiac Life Support”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 397 records · Page 22Linked to original sources

Medicare expenditures on unsuccessful out-of-hospital resuscitations.

Numerous studies have shown the futility of continued emergency department (ED) resuscitative efforts for victims of out-of hospital cardiac arrest when prehospital resuscitation has failed. Nevertheless, these patients continue to arrive in the ED, where they create a strain on resources. To assess the economic cost of this, Medicare expenditures were determined for resuscitative efforts on victims of atraumatic, out-of-hospital cardiac arrest subsequently pronounced dead in the ED. Charts of patients pronounced dead in the ED of a 65,000-visit urban teaching hospital during 1995 were reviewed. Selected patients met the following criteria: 1) Medicare recipient age 65 or over; 2) atraumatic, out-of-hospital arrest; 3) transported to the ED by an EMS crew authorized to perform advanced cardiac life support interventions. A total of 105 cases were identified that met inclusion criteria and for which Medicare had claims on file corresponding to the date of death. Ambulance service payments ranged from $105-$391; mean = $263. Physician service payments ranged from $8-$106; mean = $65. Payments for Medicare Part A (hospital facility) ranged from $59-$1,025; mean = $436. The total Medicare reimbursement was $80,197, mean = $764. This annualizes to a national expenditure projection of $58 million. Failed out-of-hospital resuscitation for Medicare patients is associated with poor outcome and high cost. Termination of these efforts in the prehospital arena is unlikely to affect outcome, and would result in considerable cost savings on physician and hospital facility charges. Compassionate protocols that recognize these principles should be developed and implemented.

Aged↗

The use of amiodarone for in-hospital cardiac arrest at two tertiary care centres.

BACKGROUND: Although amiodarone significantly increases survival to hospital admission when used in resuscitation of out-of-hospital pulseless ventricular tachycardia and fibrillation, there are limited data on its utility for in-hospital arrests. OBJECTIVES: To determine whether the use of amiodarone, as recommended by the year 2000 American Heart Association Advanced Cardiac Life Support guidelines, improved survival following its introduction to the resuscitation algorithm at two tertiary care institutions. METHODS: Charts of 374 cardiac resuscitations were retrospectively studied at the two institutions. Basic survival outcomes and demographic data were recorded for cardiac arrests with ventricular tachyarrhythmias qualifying for administration of antiarrhythmic agents. RESULTS: Qualifying rhythms were present in 95 patients. Clinical uptake of amiodarone was limited. In the 36 patients who received amiodarone, survival of resuscitation was 67% versus 83% (P=0.07) in the 59 patients receiving only other antiarrhythmic agents (chiefly lidocaine [94%]), while survival to discharge was 36.1% and 55.9% (P=0.06) in these two groups, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Following two years' experience with the introduction of intravenous amiodarone for resuscitation in the institutions, use was less than 50% and no clinically observable survival benefit could be documented. Possible explanations for the difference between this experience and that found in out-of-hospital resuscitation trials include differing patient populations and operator bias during resuscitation. These results should provoke other institutions to question whether amiodarone has improved survival of cardiac arrest under the conditions prevailing in their hospitals. A patient registry or prospective, randomized trial will be required to assess what parameters affect the success of intravenous amiodarone for resuscitation in-hospital.

Amiodarone↗

Survey of medical services at major league baseball stadiums.

OBJECTIVE: To analyze the availability and level of medical services for fans at major league baseball games in the United States. METHODS: A 10-item questionnaire was sent to the operations managers of each of 28 major league baseball stadiums. The survey was distributed in cooperation with a major league baseball club. Telephone follow-up was used to complete missing responses. The survey addressed five areas of fan medical services: 1) health-care provider availability and compensation; 2) advanced cardiac life support (ACLS) capabilities, including equipment; 3) presence of on-site ambulance(s); 4) fan fatalities; and 5) alcohol consumption limitations. RESULTS: Survey response was 100%. Healthcare providers are on-site at all stadiums: nurses (86%), physicians (75%), emergency medical technicians (EMTs, [68%]), and paramedics (50%). Ninety-six percent use a combination of health-care providers. The most common medical teams are nurse+EMT+physician (25%) and nurse+EMT+paramedic+physician (18%). All health-care providers receive some form of compensation. All stadiums have at least one ACLS-certified provider; 96% have ACLS equipment. Ambulances are on-site 75% of the time. Sixty-eight percent of the clubs reported at least one fan fatality through the 1992 and 1993 seasons (mean 1.1, range 0-4). All clubs limit alcohol consumption; 96% use multiple approaches. The various approaches include: 1) specific inning discontinuation (86%); 2) maximum purchase (68%); 3) restricted sale locations (64%); and 4) crowd conduct (57%). Advertisement for responsible alcohol consumption is displayed at 75% of the stadiums; designated-driver programs exist at 46%. CONCLUSIONS: All major league baseball clubs provide medical services for fans. Furthermore, almost all stadiums have ACLS capabilities. Responsible alcohol consumption also is a recognized priority for fan safety.

Alcohol Drinking↗

Resuscitations in an observation unit.

The outcome of all resuscitations in a 20-bed observation unit of a large teaching hospital over a 25-month period was reviewed. Resuscitation was defined as a patient receiving one or more of the following: external chest compressions; defibrillation, assisted ventilation (e.g. intubation); and/or advanced cardiac life support drug therapy such as atropine or lidocaine for life threatening dysrhythmias including ventricular tachycardia, ventricular fibrillation, or asystole. There were nine patients out of 10,245 patients admitted to the observation unit (9/10,245 = 0.088% or approximately 0.09%) over the 26-month period from May 1994 to July 1996 who needed resuscitation. Each patient was initially successfully resuscitated. There was only one death (1/10,245 = 0.0098% or approximately 0.01%) in the observation unit. This patient was resuscitated with return of a spontaneous pulse and blood pressure only to expire while awaiting transfer to the Intensive Care Unit (ICU). Eight of the nine patients were admitted to the ICU, four of whom later died, making a total of five deaths (5/10,245 = 0.049% or approximately 0.05%). The other four patients were discharged neurologically intact and at 1 year follow-up were alive and doing well. Compared with resuscitation rates for the prehospital setting, the emergency department, the hospital medical/surgical floors, or the intensive care units, there is a higher successful resuscitation rate for the observation unit.

Admitting Department, Hospital↗

Out-of-hospital resuscitation in Tartu: effect of reorganization of Estonian EMS system.

The objective of this study was to evaluate the effect of reorganization of Estonian emergency medical services (EMS) system. The outcomes of out-of-hospital resuscitation in the Tartu urban area were investigated during the 6-year study period. The main aim of reorganization was to provide rapid access to early defibrillation with simultaneous advanced cardiac life support (ACLS) procedures on the scene. The changes were implemented since summer 1994 in Tartu at first. Quick availability of a mobile intensive care unit for high-risk calls; implementation of standards for resuscitation, and routine systematic, realistic, compulsory ACLS training for all ambulance staff were established. There were 368 out-of-hospital resuscitations. Comparison of periods before and after basic reorganization of EMS system showed that the number of resuscitation attempts had evident tendency to increase. The rates of return of spontaneous circulation and survival in patients with cardiac arrest of presumed cardiac origin increased from 32.5% to 58.6% (P < .05) and from 7.5% to 25.7% (P < .05) respectively. Thus, implementation in the EMS system of mobile intensive care, ACLS units, and standard resuscitation training program diminished mortality from sudden cardiac arrest.

Aged↗

Prehospital management of rapid atrial fibrillation: recommendations for treatment protocols.

The present study was completed to establish an epidemiological database defining prehospital rapid atrial fibrillation (RAF) and interventions given such patients in the hope of developing recommendations for further treatment protocols. On review of 4,749 paramedic run reports from a low-volume urban emergency medical services (EMS) system, 33 persons (0.69%) presented with RAF. Data collected included vital signs/ventricular rate, patient age, ambulance field times, patient chief complaint, prehospital interventions, efficacy of interventions, additional cardiac rhythms, iatrogenic complications, and patient past medical history. Neither intravenous (IV) diltiazem or electrical cardioversion were used within the 12-month period of this study. Symptomatic/supportive care consisting of observation (72.73%) and interventions (27.27%) with nitroglycerine, furosemide, aspirin, morphine, and/or IV fluid bolus therapy accounted for all prehospital treatment. Paramedics documented improvement in 100% of patients. No cases occurred in which RAF resulted in severe hemodynamic instability. No inappropriate use, point estimate (PE) [(0)/(33) (0.00% to 10.60%)], or unmet need, PE [(0)/(4,716) (0.00% to 0.08%)] of care was noted. The data presented in this study suggest that given similar EMS system characteristics, prehospital RAF is an infrequently encountered, predominantly hemodynamically stable cardiac arrhythmia, readily treatable with symptomatic/supportive care, and cautious observation. The prehospital application of adult advanced cardiac life support guidelines utilizing IV diltiazem and electrical cardioversion for the treatment of RAF may be unnecessary.

Adult↗

[Attempted CPR in nursing homes - life-saving at the end of life?].

AIM: We studied the course and success rate of cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) attempted on nursing home residents by a physician-staffed pre-hospital advanced cardiac life support (ACLS) team. METHODS: Ambulance records of nursing home residents from Goettingen/Germany who had a cardiac arrest were examined retrospectively. RESULTS: During a seven-year period (1992 - 1998) the ACLS team was called to 71 residents (mean age 81.8 years) who sustained cardiac arrest. In 25 patients no CPR was attempted: 20 were pronounced dead by the arriving emergency physician, though only in 7 patients obvious clinical signs of death were present. Five patients suffered from a continuous deterioration of their health status and the ACLS team arrived after the process of dying had already started. No CPR attempt was initiated. The ACLS team performed CPR on 46 nursing home residents. In 33 patients (72 % of CPR attempts) no return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) was achieved. In three patients (6%) palpable pulse returned only transiently. Ten patients (22 %) who showed ROSC were transported to the hospital. Six patients died within 24 hours after having been admitted to the hospital, two patients within the next 8 days. Two patients survived to hospital discharge. The first was a 79-year old woman who returned to the nursing home after three weeks and survived severely mentally disabled another five days. The second was an 83-year-old man who was hospitalised for 20 days, returned in a persistent vegetative state to the nursing home and died 10 months later. A comparison of the arrest characteristics demonstrated that in patients with successful CPR there was a higher incidence of a witnessed collapse, bystander CPR, ventricular fibrillation and cardiac aetiology of arrest. CONCLUSION: In a high rate (35 %) the ACLS team with the emergency physician at the scene withheld CPR efforts in nursing home residents. Even if CPR was initiated, the benefits were very limited with only two patients (4,3 %) surviving severely disabled to hospital discharge.

Aged↗

[Analysis of ventricular fibrillation signals for the evaluation of defibrillation success in the treatment of ventricular fibrillation].

OBJECTIVE: Precise detection of ventricular fibrillation (VF), reliable prediction of defibrillation success and adjustment of the discharge waveform to the patient's transthoracic impedance may contribute to a reduction of electricity-associated myocardial injury caused by unnecessary counter shocks. Specifically, asystole thresholds distinguish between VF and asystole, and thus prevent unnecessary defibrillation attempts. We reviewed various studies and manufacturer characteristics regarding the parameters and algorithms for analyzing arrhythmia ECG signals. METHODS: Asystole threshold values of several defibrillator manufacturers were collected and a literature review was performed including the following parameters: amplitude, frequency, bispectral analysis, amplitude spectrum area, wavelets, nonlinear dynamics, N(alpha)histograms, and combinations of various parameters. RESULTS: The manufacturer dependent asystole thresholds vary substantially. We show ways to optimize an ECG-based analysis for the next technological generation of defibrillators. During advanced cardiac life support (ACLS) the probability of defibrillation success should be estimated. Optimal defibrillation waveform, depending on transthoracic resistance, should be individually determined. In case of prolonged VF with a low ECG amplitude defibrillation should not be attempted unless coronary perfusion has been improved by further measures of ACLS. The combined evaluation of VF amplitude and frequency is effective in predicting defibrillation success. Estimation of further parameters is potentially useful for guiding optimal timing of defibrillation. At present, the implementation of most parameters in out-of-hospital cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) is limited by the lack of technical feasibility of online computing. CONCLUSION: Analysis of VF ECG signals should allow adequate VF detection as well as prediction of defibrillation success. Suitable asystole thresholds for analysis of ECG signals have to be determined, and the adverse effects of CPR associated artefacts on data analysis have to be reduced. Analysis of VF ECG signals is a precondition of individually optimized defibrillation and may contribute substantially to an increased quality of CPR.

Algorithms↗

A comparison of repeated high doses and repeated standard doses of epinephrine for cardiac arrest outside the hospital. European Epinephrine Study Group.

BACKGROUND: Clinical trials have not shown a benefit of high doses of epinephrine in the management of cardiac arrest. We conducted a prospective, multicenter, randomized study comparing repeated high doses of epinephrine with repeated standard doses in cases of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. METHODS: Adult patients who had cardiac arrest outside the hospital were enrolled if the cardiac rhythm continued to be ventricular fibrillation despite the administration of external electrical shocks, or if they had asystole or pulseless electrical activity at the time epinephrine was administered. We randomly assigned 3327 patients to receive up to 15 high doses (5 mg each) or standard doses (1 mg each) of epinephrine according to the current protocol for advanced cardiac life support. RESULTS: In the high-dose group, 40.4 percent of 1677 patients had a return of spontaneous circulation, as compared with 36.4 percent of 1650 patients in the standard-dose group (P=0.02); 26.5 percent of the patients in the high-dose group and 23.6 percent of those in the standard-dose group survived to be admitted to the hospital (P=0.05); 2.3 percent of the patients in the high-dose group and 2.8 percent in the standard-dose group survived to be discharged from the hospital (P=0.34). There was no significant difference in neurologic status according to treatment among those discharged. High-dose epinephrine improved the rate of successful resuscitation in patients with asystole, but not in those with ventricular fibrillation. CONCLUSIONS: In our study, long-term survival after cardiac arrest outside the hospital was no better with repeated high doses of epinephrine than with repeated standard doses.

Adrenergic Agonists↗

Survival and neurologic outcome after cardiopulmonary resuscitation with four different chest compression-ventilation ratios.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: The optimal ratio of chest compressions to ventilations during cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) is unknown. We determine 24-hour survival and neurologic outcome, comparing 4 different chest compression-ventilation CPR ratios in a porcine model of prolonged cardiac arrest and bystander CPR. METHODS: Forty swine were instrumented and subjected to 3 minutes of ventricular fibrillation followed by 12 minutes of CPR by using 1 of 4 models of chest compression-ventilation ratios as follows: (1) standard CPR with a ratio of 15:2; (2) CC-CPR, chest compressions only with no ventilations for 12 minutes; (3) 50:5-CPR, CPR with a ratio of 50:5 compressions to ventilations, as advocated by authorities in Great Britain; and (4) 100:2-CPR, 4 minutes of chest compressions only followed by CPR with a ratio of 100:2 compressions to ventilations. CPR was followed by standard advanced cardiac life support, 1 hour of critical care, and 24 hours of observation, followed by a neurologic evaluation. RESULTS: There were no statistically significant differences in 24-hour survival among the 4 groups (standard CPR, 7/10; CC-CPR, 7/10; 50:5-CPR, 8/10; 100:2-CPR, 9/10). There were significant differences in 24-hour neurologic function, as evaluated by using the swine cerebral performance category scale. The animals receiving 100:2-CPR had significantly better neurologic function at 24 hours than the standard CPR group with a 15:2 ratio (1.5 versus 2.5; P =.007). The 100:2-CPR group also had better neurologic function than the CC-CPR group, which received chest compressions with no ventilations (1.5 versus 2.3; P =.027). Coronary perfusion pressures, aortic pressures, and myocardial and kidney blood flows were not significantly different among the groups. Coronary perfusion pressure as an integrated area under the curve was significantly better in the CC-CPR group than in the standard CPR group (P =.04). Minute ventilation and PaO (2) were significantly lower in the CC-CPR group. CONCLUSION: In this experimental model of bystander CPR, the group receiving compressions only for 4 minutes followed by a compression-ventilation ratio of 100:2 achieved better neurologic outcome than the group receiving standard CPR and CC-CPR. Consideration of alternative chest compression-ventilation ratios might be appropriate.

Animals↗

Gastroenterologist-administered propofol for therapeutic upper endoscopy with graphic assessment of respiratory activity: a case series.

BACKGROUND: Traditional methods of sedation and analgesia for advanced endoscopic procedures can be inadequate and frequently prolong recovery room observation. Propofol is a rapidly acting agent that produces an excellent hypnotic state, but its use is typically limited to anesthesiologist-assisted cases because of the inadequacy of current monitoring standards to reliably detect early stages of respiratory depression. METHODS: Ten patients undergoing advanced upper endoscopic procedures (endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography, endoscopic ultrasound, esophageal stent placement) received a propofol infusion under the control of a second qualified gastroenterologist with advanced cardiac life support skills. Graphic assessment of respiratory activity was made by using a sidestream carbon dioxide detecting cannula. Patient satisfaction was measured with a 100 mm visual analog scale. Recovery scores were measured by standardized scoring of discharge criteria. RESULTS: Monitoring with graphic assessment of respiratory activity detected early phases of respiratory depression, resulting in a timely decrease in the propofol infusion without significant hypoxemia, hypercapnia, hypotension, or arrhythmias. Satisfaction scores were extremely high (median score 92 of 100) and 9 of 10 patients met discharge criteria at 15 minutes after discontinuation of the propofol infusion. CONCLUSIONS: With the use of monitoring by graphic assessment of respiratory activity, propofol infusion by a second qualified gastroenterologist for prolonged upper endoscopic procedures is safe and results in high levels of patient satisfaction with rapid recovery times.

Adult↗

Presumption of death by air medical transport teams.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to investigate nationwide trends and factors influencing the determination of death practice by rotor-wing air medical transport programs. METHODS: A survey was mailed to all Association of Air Medical Service members concerning demographics, crew configuration, team leader, patient population, field death determination protocols, and other possible associated factors. All rotor-wing air medical transport programs that carry out scene transports were included. RESULTS: The most common field presumption criteria were no response to advanced cardiac life support (77%), no signs of life on scene (65%), and asystole in 2 EKG monitor leads (61%). The most frequent reasons cited not to presume a patient dead in the field were political issues (71%) and signs of life on scene (56%). Criteria other than medical condition that were considered in the decision to presume death were ground personnel input (55%) and program policy/medical control (39%). The following factors did not significantly affect the presumption rate: crew configuration, team leader, transport time, billing, and type of medical control. CONCLUSION: Medical criteria appear to determine presumption of death in the field. Nonmedical factors, such as billing, response, and transport times, do not affect this process.

Air Ambulances↗

Cardiac arrest in the community. How to improve survival rates.

A coordinated community response to cardiac arrest can be successful if the response time to administration of cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) is less than four minutes and to administration of advanced cardiac life support (ACLS) is less than eight minutes. Elements needed to achieve this goal include rapid access to the emergency medical system; widespread CPR training; rapid response of first responders trained in basic life support; rapid response time to ACLS, including resuscitation at the scene; and an evaluation system to determine the effectiveness of the response and then implementation of changes to prevent future mistakes. The response to cardiac arrest should be kept simple, and the community should work with the resources it possesses. Most communities already have the necessary elements and simply need to coordinate the effort into a reasonable approach. Perhaps with such an approach, 80% of deaths from sudden cardiac arrest could be prevented.

Allied Health Personnel↗

Controversies in resuscitation.

Many controversies, only a few of which have been discussed here, are now raging in the field of resuscitation. Much is expected to change in the next five to ten years. The American Heart Association is now considering changes for its new advanced cardiac life support course, which should be ready this year. The course will not include some of the possible changes mentioned in this article, because too few studies have been done. Physicians and other rescuers should abide by the guidelines of the American Heart Association as a standard of practice because its recommendations are the result of the best possible consensus. Over the next several years, many exciting changes in resuscitation will occur and may lead to improved survival rates and quality.

Calcium↗

Cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Historical and future perspectives.

Although cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) has been practiced for over a century, further study into methods for reviving victims of cardiac arrest is obviously needed. We now know that standard external CPR has numerous drawbacks, and modifications must be tested in a careful, randomized fashion. Three alternatives to standard external CPR (simultaneous compression-ventilation, interposed abdominal compression, and open-chest CPR) are currently being investigated. Of these procedures, open-chest CPR appears to show the most promise. Reproducible animal data must demonstrate the advantages of any method before widespread human studies are begun, however. If techniques seem promising in animals, well-controlled multicenter studies will be needed to verify applicability to humans. Major changes in CPR techniques should be made only after careful study, not on the basis of a limited number of reports from a single source. Resuscitation research must also extend beyond the study of techniques of cardiac massage. Although CPR is effective in some cases, clearly a person's chance of survival is directly linked to the speed of definitive care, that is, defibrillation. Research must continue into ways of providing rapid advanced cardiac care, such as home defibrillators or rapid prehospital response to the victims of cardiac arrest by those trained in advanced cardiac life support (ACLS). In addition, to counteract the problem of neurologic demise after prolonged anoxia, study of postresuscitative care must continue. Only through the combination of these measures will survival rates after cardiac arrest improve.

Animals↗

EMS medical coverage at PGA tour events.

OBJECTIVE: To analyze the availability and level of medical services for fans at Professional Golfer Association (PGA) Tour events. METHODS: A questionnaire, written in cooperation with PGA Tour headquarters, was sent to the tournament director of each PGA Tour event that hosted same-site events in 1998 and 1999. The survey addressed five areas of fan medical services: 1) health care provider availability; 2) advanced cardiac life support (ACLS) capabilities, including equipment; 3) presence of on-site ambulance(s); 4) fan fatalities; and 5) alcohol consumption limitations. RESULTS: Survey response was 92% (36/39). Health care providers were on site at all PGA Tour events: physicians (97%), emergency medical technicians [EMTs (78%)], nurses (75%), and paramedics (64%). A combination of health care providers was used at 94% of PGA Tour events. Ninety-seven percent of PGA Tour events had at least one ACLS-certified provider present along with ACLS equipment. Ambulances were on site at 89% of PGA Tour events and a hospital was located within 5-10 miles at 92% of events. Three of the PGA Tour events reported having one fan fatality through the 1998 and 1999 seasons. Seventy-eight percent of the PGA Tour events imposed regulations to limit alcohol consumption and sales. Methods included: restricted sale locations (56%); limits on alcohol sale (50%); advertisement for responsible alcohol consumption (33%); crowd conduct (28%). CONCLUSIONS: All PGA Tour events provided medical services for fans and 97% had ACLS capabilities. To promote fan safety and viewing etiquette, responsible alcohol consumption was a recognized priority at 78% of PGA Tour events.

Anniversaries and Special Events↗

Emergency medical care for spectators attending National Football League games.

OBJECTIVE: To analyze medical care facilities and resources available for spectators attending football games in the current National Football League (NFL) stadiums. METHODS: A prospective, structured questionnaire regarding facilities, transportation, medications and equipment, personnel configuration, compensation, and communications was mailed to all 28 NFL organizations. Those falling to respond were interviewed by telephone using the identical questionnaire. Data were compiled using Lotus 1-2-3. RESULTS: Data were collected from all 28 NFL organizations. Because two teams use the same stadium, results were calculated for 27 facilities (n = 27). The number of stadium first aid rooms ranges from 1 to 7, with an average of 2.4 +/- 1.3 rooms per stadium (+/- 1 SD) and these vary in size from 120 to 2,000 square feet, with a mean of 434 +/- 377 square feet. Each room is equipped with an average of 3.3 +/- 2.9 stretchers (or tables), with telephones being present in 91% and sinks in 88% of all rooms. To provide contractual EMS coverage, stadiums use standard EMS system designs, including private (n = 19), fire department-based (n = 7), municipal (city/county) (n = 5), volunteer (n = 4), and hospital (n = 3). Nine stadiums employ more than one type of provider. All stadiums have a minimum of one ambulance dedicated on-site for spectators, with a range of 1 to 7, and a mean of 2.9 +/- 1.4. Golf carts are used for intrafacility patient transportation in 17 stadiums, with a range of 1 to 6, and a mean of 2.5 +/- 1.3. Advanced Cardiac Life Support (ACLS) medications and equipment are present in all NFL stadiums and are provided by the private EMS company (n = 16), stadium (n = 10), fire EMS (n = 7), hospitals (n = 4), municipal EMS (n = 2), and the local NFL organization (n = 1). Several facilities have more than one provider of ACLS medications and equipment. The majority of stadiums dispense acetaminophen (n = 25) and aspirin (n = 24). Some dispense antacids (n = 7) and antihistamines (n = 6). The average stadium staffs 8 EMT-Bs, 7 EMT-Ps, 3 registered nurses, and 2 physicians. Nine stadiums pay a predesignated fee per game to an agency to provide emergency care to spectators. Medical personnel are compensated by an hourly rate (n = 15), a fixed rate per event (n = 9), overtime wages (n = 3), or volunteerism (n = 4). Four NFL organizations pay their medical personnel by more than one type of compensation. Courtesy seats are provided to physicians and nurses in 1 stadium and to just physicians in 8 stadiums, with a range of 2 to 6 and a mean of 3.3 +/- 1.3. All stadiums use two-way radios for the communication and coordination of medical care in the stadium. Additionally, 20 use fixed telephones in the first aid rooms, 3 use cellular telephones, and 2 incorporate a pager system to dispatch personnel within the stadium. CONCLUSION: A wide variety of system designs, facilities, and personnel configurations are used to provide emergency medical care for spectators attending NFL games. This information may be useful for assisting those individuals responsible for organizing stadium medical coverage.

Anniversaries and Special Events↗

Pharmacologic treatment of cardiac arrest.

Antiarrhythmic drugs currently recommended in the American Heart Association's Advanced Cardiac Life Support (ACLS) guidelines for the treatment of cardiac arrest have not been proved in controlled clinical trials to improve survival in patients with ventricular fibrillation (VF) or pulseless ventricular tachycardia (VT). Intravenous amiodarone is a promising agent for the treatment of VF and VT. Based on available evidence, amiodarone should be considered for use in patients with shock-refractory ventricular arrhythmias.

Amiodarone↗