Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “recommendations”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 379 records · Page 21Linked to original sources
PubMed1990

Interventions in consultation/liaison psychiatry. Part I: Patterns of recommendations.

In a previous study, a checklist and a schema for operationalized interventions have been described. In this study, these operationalized interventions have been used in clinical practice in 820 cases. In 287 cases (35%), recommendations focusing on the medical treatment, other than diagnostic action (41%) and medication (68%), were provided. This emphasis on the intensity of medical treatment is an unreported finding. The further distribution of recommendations over the different intervention domains was: obtaining additional psychosocial information, 30%; psychosocial management on the ward, 61%, specifically its organization; discharge planning, 41%; and aftercare management, 24%. Recommendations infrequently used included: monitoring of cognition and behavior, referrals to occupational therapy and alcohol- and drug-related facilities, and a detailed specification of postdischarge care. Since consultee concordance with the consultant's recommendations is important to treatment outcome, this method of a systematic recording of operationalized recommendations is a first step toward enhancing the evaluation of treatment recommended and provided by consultation/liaison (C/L) psychiatrists. Moreover, these operationalized recommendations help advance the specification of protocols for psychiatric intervention studies.

Combined Modality Therapy↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Effect of including recommendations for antimicrobial therapy in microbiology laboratory reports.

Innovative approaches are needed to improve cost-effective antibiotic use in hospitals. We established an algorithm to provide a recommendation for both a single oral and a single parenteral antimicrobic, including dosage, to be placed in the bacteriology laboratory report for therapy guidance of 174 episodes of lower respiratory infection in a group of "program" patients with no evidence of infection at other sites. The initial recommendation was based on the Gram-stained direct smear of secretions. The recommendation was updated when preliminary culture results were available, and again with final identification and susceptibility data. We compared the severity of illness, length of stay, and cost of therapy for 68 episodes in program patients who received the recommended therapy with 111 episodes in a control group of patients who received antimicrobial therapy but for whom no recommendations were reported. There was a significantly greater use of the recommendations for sicker patients. Antimicrobial therapy, in general, was more often used for the program patients than for the controls. There was no difference in length of stay or therapy cost. We recommend that this approach be used in settings where there is more problematic use of antimicrobics.

Algorithms↗
PubMed2004

The relation of autopsy rate to physicians' beliefs and recommendations regarding autopsy.

PURPOSE: Multiple factors have affected the decline in autopsy rates. Our goal was to determine the relation of physicians' recommendations regarding autopsy, as well as patient and surrogate decision-maker characteristics, to autopsy performance. METHODS: We assessed measures related to autopsy performance using data from two teaching institutions in the Study to Understand Prognoses and Preferences for Outcomes and Risks of Treatments. We included patients who had died within 6 months of their index hospitalization and for whom information was available on autopsy performance, physicians' response to questions about autopsy, and interviews with surrogate decision makers about autopsy performance. We assessed the association between autopsy performance and the strength of a physician's recommendation for autopsy, adjusting for patient, surrogate, and physician characteristics. RESULTS: Of the 680 patients who died, 59% (n = 402) met our inclusion criteria. Based on physician and surrogate responses, the expected autopsy rate was 42% while the actual autopsy rate was 23%. The autopsy rate was higher when the physician's recommendation for autopsy was strong or very strong at the time of death compared with when autopsy was not recommended strongly or not at all (P <0.001). The strength of the physician's postmortem recommendation was independently associated with autopsy performance after adjusting for patient, surrogate, and physician characteristics (P <0.001). CONCLUSION: Autopsies are less likely to be performed when not recommended strongly or not at all. Training physicians (or others) how to recommend autopsies may increase autopsy rates.

Aged↗
PubMed2005

Evaluating existing recommendations for hepatitis A and B vaccination.

Hepatitis A and hepatitis B vaccines are now widely available throughout the United States, Europe, and most of the rest of the world. A recombinant hepatitis B vaccine was licensed in the United States in 1986, followed by hepatitis A vaccine in 1995. Official recommendations from the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices were published for hepatitis B vaccine in 1990, with revisions in 1991, and for hepatitis A vaccine in 1999. Unfortunately, the recommendations are not closely followed, and an insufficient number of persons who are at risk receive these vaccines. In addition, the available recommendations may not cover all who are at risk for infection. This article reviews existing recommendations for the use of hepatitis A and hepatitis B vaccines and offers suggestions for situations in which additional recommendations may be useful. The rationale for revising and expanding the existing recommendations is based on questions raised about the value of risk-based recommendations, data demonstrating increasing rates of hepatitis A and B infections in specific age groups, and the failure to protect 50% of individuals who become infected with vaccine-preventable hepatitis.

Hepatitis A↗
PubMed2006

Recommendations for best practices in the treatment of Alzheimer's disease in managed care.

BACKGROUND: Alzheimer's disease and related dementias (ADRDs) are increasingly recognized as important causes of impaired cognition, function, and quality of life, as well as excess medical care utilization and costs in the elderly Medicare managed care population. Evidence-based clinical practice guidelines for ADRDs were published in 2001. More recent studies have resulted in the approval of new agents and demonstrated an expanded role for antidementia therapy in various types of dementia, settings of care, stages of disease, and the use of combination therapy. However, these clinical guidelines have not been updated in the past few years. OBJECTIVE: The goal of this article was to provide practical recommendations developed by a panel of experts that address issues of early diagnosis, treatment, and care management of ADRDs. The panel also addressed the societal and managed care implications. METHODS: A panel of leading experts was convened to develop consensus recommendations for the treatment and management of dementia based on currently available evidence and the panel's informed expert opinion. The panel comprised 12 leading experts, including clinical investigators and practitioners in geriatric medicine, neurology, psychiatry, and psychology; managed care medical and pharmacy directors; a health systems medical director; and a health policy expert. In addition, articles were collected based on PubMed searches (2000-2005) that were relevant to the key issues identified. Search terms included Alzheimer's disease, dementia, clinical practice guidelines, clinical trials, screening and assessment, and managed care. RESULTS: ADRDs represent a significant clinical and economic burden to individuals and society, including Medicare managed care organizations (MCOs). Appropriate utilization of antidementia therapy and care management is vitally important to achieving quality of life and care for dementia patients and their caregivers, and for managing the excess costs of Alzheimer's disease. The recommendations address relevant, practical, and timely concerns that are faced on a daily basis by practitioners and by Medicare MCO medical management programs in the care of dementia patients. These consensus recommendations attempt to describe a reasonable current standard for the provision of quality care for patients with dementia. The panel recommendations support the use of screening for cognitive impairment and the use of antidementia therapy for ADRDs in different stages of disease and types of dementia in all clinical settings. The panel members evaluated the use of the 3 marketed cholinesterase inhibitors-donepezil, galantamine, and rivastigmine-as well as the N-methyl-D-aspartate antagonist memantine. Recommendations for using these medications are made with an appreciation of the difficulties in translating the results from investigational clinical trials into clinical practice. CONCLUSIONS: The recommendations of the expert panel represent a clear consensus that nihilism in the diagnosis, treatment, and management of ADRDs is unwarranted, impairs quality of care, and is ultimately not costeffective.

Aged↗
PubMed2004

Monitoring amiodarone's toxicities: recommendations, evidence, and clinical practice.

OBJECTIVES: We sought to develop an explicit evidence-based model of medication monitoring and to evaluate monitoring practices and adverse drug events in patients taking amiodarone at one institution. METHODS: We searched MEDLINE (1966 through 2000) for English-language publications providing specific monitoring recommendations for amiodarone. A cross-sectional retrospective chart review of 99 outpatients receiving amiodarone therapy between Jan 1, 2000, and Jan 1, 2001, at a large tertiary-care hospital was performed to assess monitoring practices. Adverse drug events were identified by use of structured implicit reviews. The main outcome measure was the proportion of patients receiving the monitoring recommended in the literature and having amiodarone-related adverse drug events. RESULTS: Forty-three articles were identified that provided specific monitoring recommendations, although no studies were found that compared the outcomes of patients managed with different monitoring regimens. Overall, 70% of the recommended monitoring criteria were satisfied, although only 9 patients (9%; 95% confidence interval [95% CI], 3%-15%) received all of the recommended monitoring. Variability in monitoring practices was identified at all stages of the monitoring model. Of the patients, 52 (52%; 95% CI, 42%-62%) received minimum baseline evaluations, 22 (22%; 95% CI, 14%-31%) underwent ongoing surveillance, 75 (75%; 95% CI, 61%-89%) had appropriate responses to abnormal surveillance results, and 71 (71%; 95% CI, 62%-80%) had timely follow-up visits. Of the patients, 8 (8%; 95% CI, 3%-13%) had 9 amiodarone-related adverse drug events, of which 3 were judged to be preventable. Interrater agreement for monitoring processes (kappa = 0.83) and adverse drug events (kappa = 0.67) was good. CONCLUSIONS: Current standards for amiodarone toxicity monitoring are based on expert opinion with limited evidence to support most recommendations. Monitoring practices appear to vary significantly, with few patients receiving all of the recommended monitoring. Some amiodarone-related adverse drug events may be preventable and patient safety might be improved with a better understanding of monitoring processes.

Adult↗
PubMed2006

Most Americans eat much less than recommended amounts of fruits and vegetables.

OBJECTIVE: To estimate the proportions of the population meeting recommendations for fruit and vegetable intake, we first estimated the usual intake distributions of total fruits and vegetables and then compared the results to the 5 A Day recommendation and to the recommendations for fruits and vegetables combined, found in the new US Department of Agriculture food guide, MyPyramid. DESIGN/SUBJECTS: The primary dataset was created from one 24-hour recall from each of 8,070 respondents in the 1999-2000 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. Variances were estimated using one or two 24-hour recalls from 14,963 respondents in the 1994-1996 Continuing Survey of Food Intakes by Individuals. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: The statistical method developed at Iowa State University was used for estimating distributions of usual intake of dietary components that are consumed daily. It was modified to allow the adjustment of heterogeneous within-person variances using an external estimate of heterogeneity. RESULTS: In 1999-2000, only 40% of Americans ate an average of five or more (1/2)-cup servings of fruits and vegetables per day. The proportions of sex-age groups meeting the new US Department of Agriculture recommendations ranged from 0.7% of boys aged 14 to 18 years, whose combined recommendation is 5 cups, to 48% of children aged 2 to 3 years, whose combined recommendation is 2 cups. CONCLUSIONS: Americans need to consume more fruits and vegetables, especially dark green and orange vegetables and legumes. Nutritionists must help consumers realize that, for everyone older than age 3 years, the new recommendations for fruit and vegetable intakes are greater than the familiar five servings a day.

Adolescent↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Health services research related to chiropractic: review and recommendations for research prioritization by the chiropractic profession.

PURPOSE: This project updates a previous effort to inventory health services research conducted on chiropractic and makes recommendations for a subsequent research agenda. A qualitative review of social sciences, medical, chiropractic, and health services research literature regarding chiropractic was done with emphasis on research published since the initial health services research agenda effort in 1995. This work informed development of updated health services research recommendations. METHODS: Literature was gathered through searches of electronic health care database retrieval systems and citation tracking. In addition to general collecting of new studies, the authors considered to what extent the 1995 research recommendations had been addressed in the new literature. A seed set of refined recommendations was formulated and initially distributed expert review and revision. The recommendations were made available for public comment and hearing at the 10th Annual Research Agenda Conference for Chiropractic in March 2005. DISCUSSION: The past 10 years have seen numerous health service research studies related to chiropractic; however, nearly all of the research priorities identified in 1995 remain unaddressed and remain as important priorities. Thus, recommendations were reprioritized and revised to submit for open comment and hearing. CONCLUSION: A smaller number of more concise recommendations with more specific action steps are proposed for clinical quality improvement, performing cost analyses, and assessing use barriers for chiropractic.

Chiropractic↗
PubMed2006

Physician colorectal cancer screening recommendations: an examination based on informed decision making.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this research was to examine the content of physicians' colorectal cancer screening recommendations. More specifically, using the framework of informed decision making synthesized by Braddock and colleagues, we conducted a qualitative study of the content of recommendations to describe how physicians are currently presenting this information to patients. METHODS: We conducted semi-structured interviews with 65 primary care physicians. We analyzed responses to a question designed to elicit how the physicians typically communicate their recommendation. RESULTS: Almost all of the physicians (98.5%) addressed the "nature of decision" element. A majority of physicians discussed "uncertainties associated with the decision" (67.7%). Fewer physicians covered "the patient's role in decision making" (33.8%), "risks and benefits" (16.9%), "alternatives" (10.8%), "assessment of patient understanding" (6.2%), or "exploration of patient's preferences" (1.5%). CONCLUSION: We propose that the content of the colorectal screening recommendation is a critical determinant to whether a patient undergoes screening. Our examination of physician recommendations yielded mixed results, and the deficiencies identified opportunities for improvement. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: We suggest primary care physicians clarify that screening is meant for those who are asymptotic, present tangible and intangible benefits and risks, as well as make a primary recommendation, and, if needed, a "compromise" recommendation, in order to increase screening utilization.

Adult↗
PubMed1995

Positive association between dietetics recommendations and achievement of enteral nutrition outcomes of care.

OBJECTIVE: To identify planned dietetics outcomes of care, dietitians activities performed an recommendations made, and outcome achievement and its relationship to recommendations followed. DESIGN: A multisite, single-group prospective pilot study was conducted to describe the care provided by dietitians to patients receiving enteral nutrition care. SUBJECTS/SETTING: Participants were 172 patients (16 of whom died during hospitalization) receiving at least 75% of nutrient requirements from enteral nutrition products. Subjects were from six acute-care facilities and one rehabilitation facility in the Chicago metropolitan area. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Dietitians identified planned outcomes of care to be accomplished and documented activities performed during the provision of care. Data were collected to measure outcome achievement and to determine whether dietitians' recommendations were followed. STATISTICAL ANALYSES PERFORMED: Descriptive data are reported as frequencies or means +/- standard error. Odds ratios were constructed to estimate the association between dietitians' enteral care recommendations and the achievement of planned outcomes of care. RESULTS: Whether or not enteral nutrition outcomes of care were achieved was positively associated with dietitians' recommendations. The odds of patients' achieving the recommended energy intake goal (P < .001) or increasing (P < .01) or maintaining (P < .04) visceral protein stores were at least four times greater when dietitians' recommendations were followed than when they were not. In addition, dietetics activities performed at the local level were similar to established practices. APPLICATIONS: Dietitians can identify and measure outcomes of dietetics-related care that demonstrate positive contributions to the interdisciplinary enteral nutrition care process.

Dietary Services↗
PubMed2000

Antimicrobial therapy of acute otitis media: review of treatment recommendations.

OBJECTIVE: This paper reviews 3 previously published articles that provided recommendations for antimicrobial therapy of acute otitis media (AOM) and combines them to provide revised recommendations. BACKGROUND: AOM is one of the most common pediatric infections requiring a prescription for an antimicrobial agent. The optimal approach to treatment of AOM requires early, efficacious, and practical therapy. Several experts and organizations have developed recommendations for the management of AOM, but the number of these may overwhelm the busy primary care practitioner. A MEDLINE search of the pediatric and infectious disease literature on AOM treatment recommendations was used to select 3 representative, previously published articles for this review. When selecting an agent, physicians should consider in vitro activity, particularly against drug-resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae; pharmacokinetics; adverse events; palatability of the suspension; and cost. In addition, physicians' clinical experience is an important determinant. CONCLUSIONS: Amoxicillin is recommended as the first-line agent to treat uncomplicated AOM. For clinical treatment failures after 3 days of amoxicillin, recommended antimicrobial agents include oral amoxicillin/clavulanate, cefuroxime axetil, cefprozil, cefpodoxime proxetil, and intramuscular (i.m.) ceftriaxone. I.m. ceftriaxone should be reserved for severe cases or patients in whom noncompliance is expected. Tympanocentesis for identification of pathogens and susceptibility to antimicrobial agents is recommended for selection of third-line agents.

Anti-Infective Agents↗
PubMed2003

The influence of cost-effectiveness information on physicians' cancer screening recommendations.

Physicians are increasingly faced with choices in which one screening strategy is both more effective and more expensive than another. One way to make such choices is to examine the cost-effectiveness of the more costly strategy over the less costly one. However, little is known about how cost-effectiveness information influences physicians' screening decisions. We surveyed 900 primary care US physicians, and presented each with a hypothetical cancer-screening scenario. We created three familiar screening scenarios, involving cervical, colon, and breast cancer. We also created three unfamiliar screening scenarios. Physicians were randomized to receive one of nine questionnaires, each containing one screening scenario. Three questionnaires posed one of the familiar screening scenarios without cost-effectiveness information, three posed one of the familiar scenarios with cost-effectiveness information, and three posed one of the unfamiliar scenarios with cost-effectiveness information. The cost-effectiveness information for familiar scenarios was drawn from the medical literature. The cost-effectiveness information for unfamiliar scenarios was fabricated to match that of a corresponding familiar scenario. In all questionnaires, physicians were asked what screening alternative they would recommend. A total of 560 physicians responded (65%). For familiar scenarios, providing cost-effectiveness information had at most a small influence on physicians' screening recommendations; it reduced the proportion of physicians recommending annual Pap smears (p=0.003), but did not significantly alter the aggressiveness of colon cancer and breast cancer screening (both p's<0.1). For all three unfamiliar scenarios, physicians were significantly less likely to recommend expensive screening strategies than in corresponding familiar scenarios (all p's<0.001). Physicians' written explanations revealed a number of factors that moderated the influence of cost-effectiveness information on their screening recommendations. Providing physicians with cost-effectiveness information had only a moderate influence on their screening recommendations for cervical, colon, and breast cancer. Significantly, fewer physicians recommended aggressive screening for unfamiliar cancers than for familiar ones, despite similar cost-effectiveness. Physicians are relatively reluctant to abandon common screening strategies, even when they learn that they are expensive, and are hesitant to adopt unfamiliar screening strategies, even when they learn that they are inexpensive.

Adult↗
PubMed2006

Impact of CEDIT recommendations: An example of health technology assessment in a hospital network.

OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study is to assess the impact of CEDIT (French Committee for the Assessment and Dissemination of Technological Innovations) recommendations on the introduction of technological innovations within the AP-HP (Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris), the French hospital network to which this body is attached. METHODS: In 2002, a study based on semidirective interviews of fourteen people affected by these recommendations and a case study relating to thirteen recommendations issued between 1995 and 1998 were conducted. RESULTS: The CEDIT is very scientifically reputable among interviewees. There is generally widespread interest for the recommendations. They are used as decision-making tools by administrative staff and as negotiating instruments by doctors in their dealings with management. Based on the case study, ten of thirteen recommendations had an impact on the introduction of the technology in health establishments. One recommendation appears not to have had an impact. Furthermore, the impact of two technologies was impossible to assess. CONCLUSIONS: This study highlights the significant impact of recommendations arising from a structure that is attached to a hospital network and the good match between CEDIT's objectives and its assignments.

Decision Making↗
PubMed2006

Integration of health technology assessment recommendations into organizational and clinical practice: A case study in Catalonia.

OBJECTIVES: Evaluating the impact of recommendations based upon health technology assessment (HTA) represents a challenge for both HTA agencies and healthcare policy makers. This research sought to understand factors affecting the uptake of HTA recommendations to support decision making with respect to the introduction of three health technologies. METHODS: Using a multidimensional framework, based upon a combination of theoretical models, a case study was conducted. A total of twenty-eight semistructured interviews were done with physicians from fifteen hospitals and other stakeholders in Catalonia. Interview content was analyzed iteratively and classified according to theoretical dimensions and contextual factors. RESULTS: At the sociopolitical level, factors related to the organization and financing of the health system were found to affect the utilization of HTA recommendations. At the healthcare organization level, existing collaborations between the hospital and the HTA agency favored the integration of recommendations into practices. Formalism in the organization also influenced the utilization of HTA recommendations. At the professional level, the high degree of autonomy of specialists, the importance of peers and collegial control, and the definition of professional roles and responsibilities influenced physicians' willingness to integrate HTA recommendations into their practice. CONCLUSIONS: This study offers a comprehensive framework to understand the complex dynamics that affect adoption of health technologies in organizational and professional practices. The findings suggest some avenues to promote the integration of HTA recommendations into practices and, thus, increase the utilization of scientific evidence to support decision making in health care.

Decision Making↗
PubMed2004

The nationwide evaluation of fetal and infant mortality review (FIMR) programs: development and implementation of recommendations and conduct of essential maternal and child health services by FIMR programs.

OBJECTIVE: An evaluation of fetal and infant mortality review (FIMR) programs nationwide was conducted to characterize their unique role in improving the system of perinatal health care. The aim of this paper is to examine intermediate outcomes of the FIMR, in particular the development and implementation of recommendations produced by the FIMRs and the conduct of essential MCH services by the FIMRs. METHODS: We report on 74 FIMRs whose communities were selected for the nationwide evaluation and for whom we had data from the FIMR director or comparable respondent. We focus on the recommendations of the FIMRs and the essential maternal and child health (MCH) services conducted by the FIMRs as intermediate outcomes (or outputs) and then examine how selected characteristics of the FIMR may influence these. RESULTS: FIMRs developed recommendations on a broad range of topics but there were some areas for which nearly all programs had developed recommendations. The FIMRs relied primarily on strategies related to programs and practices, with few FIMRs reporting attention to policy-oriented approaches. Implementation of recommendations was high. Factors that influenced likelihood of implementing recommendations and conduct of essential MCH services included structure of the FIMR and training received by FIMR directors and staff. CONCLUSIONS: The focus of FIMR recommendations and the likelihood of implementation vary across FIMRs as does the conduct of essential MCH services. FIMR team structure and training of the director and staff are important areas to consider in efforts to maximize the impact of FIMR.

Child Health Services↗
PubMed2001

Predicting adherence to recommendations by parents of clinic-referred children.

The authors examined predictors of parents' adherence to recommendations made by psychologists after the evaluation of clinic-referred children. Parents or legal guardians of 93 children aged 4 to 12 years participated. The major findings were that (a) child behavior problem severity, parent recall of recommendations, parent satisfaction with the child's psychological evaluation, and locus of control were not significantly associated with adherence; (b) number of perceived barriers was the most salient predictor of adherence to recommendations, regardless of recommendation type; and (c) adherence rates to psychological services recommendations were significantly lower, compared with those for school-based or professional nonpsychological recommendations. Implications for more research on predictors of adherence to recommendations and clinical strategies for overcoming barriers to adherence are discussed.

Behavior Therapy↗
PubMed2000

Sound and the developing infant in the NICU: conclusions and recommendations for care.

OBJECTIVE: To present the conclusions and associated recommendations for care developed by the Physical and Developmental Environment of the High-Risk Infant Center, Study Group on Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU) Sound, and the Expert Review Panel. STUDY DESIGN: A multidisciplinary group of clinicians and researchers reviewed the literature regarding the effect of sound on the fetus, newborn, and preterm infant and developed recommendations based on the best evidence. An Expert Review Panel reviewed the data and conclusions. RESULTS: The following recommendations are developed from the review of the literature and are clarified in the body of the article. (1) Women should avoid prolonged exposure to low-frequency sound levels (< 250 Hz) above 65 dB(A) during pregnancy. (2) Earphones or other devices for sound production should not be used directly attached to the pregnant woman's abdomen. (3) The voice of the mother during normal daily activities, along with the sounds produced by her body and those present in her usual surroundings, is sufficient for normal fetal auditory development. The fetus does not require supplemental stimulation. Programs to supplement the fetal auditory experience cannot be recommended. (4) Infant intensive care units should incorporate a system of regular noise assessment. (5) Sound limit recommendations are to maintain a nursery with an hourly Leq of 50 dB(A), an hourly L10 of 55 dB(A) and a 1-second Lmax of 70 dB(A), all A-weighted, slow response scale. (6) Infant intensive care units should develop and maintain a program of noise control and abatement in order to operate within the recommended permissible noise criteria. (7) Care practices must provide ample opportunity for the infant to hear parent voices live in interaction between parent and infant at the bedside. (8) Earphones and other devices attached to the infant's ears for sound transmission should not be used at any time. (9) There is little evidence to support the use of recorded music or speech in the environment of the high-risk infant. Audio recordings should not be used routinely or left unattended in the environment of the high-risk infant. CONCLUSION: The recommendations, if followed, should provide an environment that will protect sleep, support stable vital signs, improve speech intelligibility for the infant, and reduce potential adverse effects on auditory development.

Animals↗
PubMed1999

What is recommended for healthy women during pregnancy? A comparison of seven prenatal clinical practice guideline documents.

BACKGROUND: Several countries have developed clinical practice guidelines for the content of prenatal care. This study examines the consistency of recommendations in clinical practice guidelines describing routine prenatal care. METHODS: The recommendations for low-risk women in seven guideline documents were examined: two from Australia, two from the United States, two from Canada, and one from Germany. The recommendations were listed into the four areas of "general health screening and health promotion during pregnancy," "organization of care," "clinical tests and screening," and "education specific for pregnancy." RESULTS: A total of 69 recommendations were identified within the seven documents, most of which fell within the "clinical tests and screening" domain. Notable differences were identified in the number of recommendations made within the same country. Of the 69 recommendations, only four were included in all seven documents. CONCLUSION: Little consistency was demonstrated within or among countries in terms of the content of their prenatal care guidelines, suggesting a need to reexamine their content and the evidence on which such recommendations are based.

Australia↗