Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Validity”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 379 records · Page 21Linked to original sources
PubMed1989

[Validity of the Hoppe List. An empirical study of patients with backache].

Construct validity, criterion-oriented validity, and differential validity were assessed to determine the validity of the Hoppe-Liste (HL). Construct validity was ascertained by the multitrait-multimethod analysis suggested by Campbell & Fiske. Data regarding both convergent and discriminant validity show that the HL measures the construct pain. A comparison of the HL with the Revised Multidimensional Pain Scale and the Visual Analogue Scale suggests the criterion-oriented validity of the HL. Group-specific scores of the HL scales and of correlation patterns between scales tentatively support differential validity. It is concluded that the HL seems to be a suitable instrument for measuring the intensity and quality of pain.

Back Pain↗
PubMed1980

Research design: measurement, reliability, and validity.

The concept of measuring constructs is discussed. An explanation of reliability and validity of measures is presented. Reliability is consistency in measurement over repeated measures. Reliable measures are those with low random (chance) errors. Reliability is assessed by one of four methods: retest, alternative-form test, split-halves test, or internal consistency test. Validity is measuring what is intended to be measured. Valid measures are those with low nonrandom (systematic) errors. Validity is assessed by one of three methods: content validation, criterion-related validation, and construct validation. It is particularly important for the researcher in the behavioral or social sciences to assure himself that measures used are both reliable and valid.

Models, Theoretical↗
PubMed1993

Spanish version of the Health Assessment Questionnaire: reliability, validity and transcultural equivalency. Grupo para la Adaptación del HAQ a la Población Española.

OBJECTIVE: To study the feasibility, reliability, and validity, of a Spanish European version of the Health Assessment Questionnaire (SHAQ). METHODS: A total of 170 patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) from 11 public general hospitals in Spain were included. We studied (a) the feasibility of the SHAQ by finding the proportion of patients able to self-administer it and the time they take to do so; (b) the test-retest reliability of the SHAQ when completed twice, with an interval of one week, calculating the Pearson correlation coefficient (r) between the first and second SHAQ scores; (c) the criterion validity of the SHAQ by comparing the clinician's assessment of the patient's activities (observed disability) with the scores noted by the patient in the questionnaire (referred disability); (d) cross sectional construct validity comparing the scores of the SHAQ with the other tests used in the assessment of RA; and (e) the longitudinal construct validity of the SHAQ comparing the difference between the initial and final SHAQ scores with the patient rating of improvement or worsening after a 3-month followup. RESULTS: The SHAQ was self-administered by 63% of patients, the rest needed the presence of an interviewer. The time taken to complete the questionnaire was 6.4 min. Test-retest reliability (r = 0.89), criterion validity (r = 0.87), cross sectional construct validity, and longitudinal construct validity were satisfactory and similar to other HAQ versions used in different countries. CONCLUSION: The SHAQ is a reliable, valid tool, but for use in Spain an interviewer may be necessary.

Activities of Daily Living↗
PubMed1993

Echocardiographic determination of valid zero reference levels in supine and lateral positions.

BACKGROUND: The phlebostatic axis--the junction of the fourth intercostal space and the midpoint of the anterior-posterior diameter--has been accepted as a reliable external reference point for the mid-right and mid-left atrium. Acceptance of this reference point is based upon research conducted in 1945 that measured venous pressures in the hands of subjects positioned with the head of the bed raised to different levels. The validity of this reference point for intracardiac pressure measurements in supine or laterally positioned patients has not been established. PURPOSE: To determine the validity of the phlebostatic axis in the supine and lateral positions. METHODS: To determine validity in the supine position, we compared the distance from the phlebostatic axis to a fixed external point (the bed surface) and the distance from the right and left atria in the supine position to this same fixed external point. The distances from the right and left atria to the bed surface were determined with echocardiography and were used as the standard for the proper position of external reference points. To determine the validity of the phlebostatic axis in lateral positions, we compared the distances from the right atrium and left atrium to the bed surface in the supine position with those distances in different lateral positions. RESULTS: We analyzed the data of 25 normal, healthy subjects. The study findings show that the phlebostatic axis is a valid reference point for the right atrium, and the phlebostatic axis and midanterior-posterior diameter are valid reference points for the left atrium in the supine position. However, neither is a valid external reference point in the lateral positions. Pressure measurements obtained when patients are in the lateral positions are not accurate. There remains a need to develop valid methods of accurate pressure measurements in various body positions.

Adult↗
PubMed2026

Validation of a Turkish Translation of the Stress in Emergency Healthcare Professionals: The Stress Factors and Manifestations Scale.

AIM: The primary duties of emergency healthcare professionals (EHPs) are to provide emergency patient care to acutely ill and injured individuals. Due to the nature of their work, EHPs operate under constant stress, often requiring rapid decision-making, swift action, and the delivery of necessary medical care in life-or-death situations, sometimes under inadequately safe conditions. Therefore, the aim of this study is to determine the validity and reliability of the Emergency Healthcare Professional Stress Factors and Symptoms (SEHP:SFMS) Scale in Turkish for identifying stress factors and symptoms in emergency medical care professionals providing emergency patient care services. DESIGN: A methodological study design was used in this study. METHODS: The study was conducted with the participation of 211 EHPs from employees working in emergency care institutions affiliated with the Muğla Provincial Health Directorate between November 2023 and June 2024. Data were collected via a face-to-face survey. Data were analysed using Lawshe content validity ratio, Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin coefficient, Bartlett test, exploratory factor analysis, principal component analysis, Varimax factor rotation method, confirmatory factor analysis, Cronbach's α internal consistency coefficient, convergent validity, discriminant validity, test-retest, and Spearman correlation coefficient tests. RESULTS: The linguistic translation and cultural adaptation of the SEHP:SFMS showed strong performance. The scope validity index of the scale is 0.83. The item-total correlation values of the scale were found to be between 0.486 and 0.794, and the factor loadings were between 0.474 and 0.816. Confirmatory factor analysis fit indices: χ2 = 248.727; df = 101; n = 211; p = 0.000; χ2/df = 2.463; RMSEA = 0.083; CFI = 0.914, SRMR = 0.052, which was found to be compatible and acceptable with the proposed 3-factor model. The Cronbach's α reliability coefficient of the scale was 0.931, and the total variance was 61.97%. CONCLUSIONS: SEHP:SFMS is a valid and reliable tool to assess stress factors and symptoms of Turkish emergency healthcare professionals. Its use improves the quality of emergency care. PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: These study findings have been used to create a tool with Turkish validity and reliability that allows for the examination of stress factors among healthcare professionals working in emergency and critical services. Identifying and reducing stress factors among healthcare professionals is crucial for the delivery of quality healthcare services. It can also be used to develop targeted interventions and ongoing strategies to facilitate improved clinical supervision and mentoring. IMPLICATION FOR NURSING PRACTICE: Nurses in emergency departments, which are among the most stressful, dynamic, intense, life-saving, and critical environments in healthcare institutions, and where life-saving treatment is administered, are at high risk of experiencing psychological trauma. Trauma experienced in the work environment is a significant problem for nursing. The consequences of trauma negatively affect nurses and institutions. Studies show that post-traumatic stress, anxiety, depression, and burnout are commonly observed in emergency department nurses. In this sense, understanding the stress and stress factors experienced by nurses can guide future interventions. The results of this study are considered important in making visible the stress and stress factors experienced by nurses in the emergency department, and also in guiding managers and nurses working in this field in terms of preventive and protective measures.

Humans↗
PubMed2005

Development and validation of a clinical index for assessment of long-term damage in juvenile idiopathic arthritis.

OBJECTIVE: To develop and validate a clinical measure of articular and extraarticular damage in patients with juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA). METHODS: The Juvenile Arthritis Damage Index (JADI), which is derived from physical examination and a brief review of the patient's clinical history, is composed of 2 parts: assessments of articular damage (JADI-A) and extraarticular damage (JADI-E). Instrument validation was accomplished by evaluating 158 JIA patients with disease duration of at least 5 years, seen consecutively over 21 months. The instrument's feasibility, face and content validity, construct and discriminative ability, internal consistency, and interrater reliability were examined. RESULTS: Among the 158 JIA patients, 47% and 37% had articular and extraarticular damage, respectively. The JADI was found to be feasible and to possess both face and content validity. The JADI-A score correlated highly with the number of joints with limited range of motion (Spearman's r [r(S)] = 0.72) and correlated moderately with the Childhood Health Assessment Questionnaire score (r(S) = 0.41), Steinbrocker functional classification (r(S) = 0.50), and Poznanski's score of radiographic damage (r(S) = -0.54), thereby demonstrating good construct validity. Correlations with the JADI-E score were lower, owing to the heterogeneity of its items. The JADI-A discriminated well among different levels of disability. The internal consistency (Chronbach's alpha) of the JADI-A and JADI-E was 0.93 and 0.59, respectively. The intraclass correlation coefficients between pairs of independent observers ranged from 0.85 to 0.97. CONCLUSION: The JADI exhibited good reliability, construct validity, and discriminative ability and is therefore a valid instrument for the assessment of long-term damage in patients with JIA, in the context of both clinical management and research settings.

Arthritis, Juvenile↗
PubMed2004

Validation of French version of the Scleroderma Health Assessment Questionnaire (SSc HAQ).

The modified Scleroderma Health Assessment Questionnaire (SSc HAQ) is a functional score to assess systemic sclerosis (SSc) comprising the HAQ disease index (HAQ-DI) plus five specific visual analogue scales (VAS). Since it was validated in English-speaking patients only, its general use in any other language necessitates prior cross-cultural adaptation and validation. We designed this study to assess its value in French-speaking patients and to validate the French version according to international recommendations. We elaborated a French version using the "forward-backward" method. We then validated its psychometric properties with 100 consecutive SSc French-speaking patients who had undergone simultaneous clinical and paraclinical examination. In addition, we calculated the SSc HAQ score, a new outcome measure, which is obtained by pooling the eight domains from the HAQ-DI with the five organ VAS. Our study confirmed the psychometric properties of the SSc HAQ in non-English-speaking patients with (a) structural validity: the major component analysis, performed on the HAQ-DI and the five VAS, yielding a two-factor structure; (b) convergent validity: with high correlation coefficients between the SSc HAQ score and the physical component score of the SF-36 (r=-0.74, p<0.0001); (c) discriminant validity: the SSc HAQ score was better in patients with limited than with diffuse SSc (0.5+/-0.5 vs 1.1+/-0.7, respectively, p<0.0001) in relation to the number of clinical involvements; (d) reproducibility was high using the test-retest procedure (r=0.98). This study showed the value of the SSc HAQ, which is a simple, discriminant, reproducible self-administered questionnaire to evaluate French-speaking SSc patients. In addition, we suggest the use of a new outcome measure, the SSc HAQ score, to assess this systemic disease more accurately.

Disability Evaluation↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Validation tools for variable subset regression.

Variable selection is applied frequently in QSAR research. Since the selection process influences the characteristics of the finally chosen model, thorough validation of the selection technique is very important. Here, a validation protocol is presented briefly and two of the tools which are part of this protocol are introduced in more detail. The first tool, which is based on permutation testing, allows to assess the inflation of internal figures of merit (such as the cross-validated prediction error). The other tool, based on noise addition, can be used to determine the complexity and with it the stability of models generated by variable selection. The obtained statistical information is important in deciding whether or not to trust the predictive abilities of a specific model. The graphical output of the validation tools is easily accessible and provides a reliable impression of model performance. Among others, the tools were employed to study the influence of leave-one-out and leave-multiple-out cross-validation on model characteristics. Here, it was confirmed that leave-multiple-out cross-validation yields more stable models. To study the performance of the entire validation protocol, it was applied to eight different QSAR data sets with default settings. In all cases internal and external model performance was good, indicating that the protocol serves its purpose quite well.

Quantitative Structure-Activity Relationship↗
PubMed2006

Validation of a comprehensive classification tool for treatment-related problems.

OBJECTIVE: Several drug-related problem classification systems can be found in the literature. However, it is generally agreed that a comprehensive, well constructed and validated instrument is currently lacking. The aim of this study is the development and validation of a comprehensive treatment-related problems assessment and classification tool for use in teaching, practicing and researching pharmaceutical care and to improve identification, resolving and preventing of treatment-related problems. METHOD: The development and validation involved five steps starting with literature search to define a treatment related problem and also to form a database of treatment-related problems identified in the literature. In the next step, all problems that were identified in the first step and passed the evaluation of the three authors were pooled together and then divided into groups according to their common or shared construct, in the third step a suitable assessment method was developed according to the construct of the different problems, in the next step the developed instrument was validated for content, internal and external validity. Finally the tool was finalized and tested for reproducibility and inter-rater agreement. RESULTS: The final validated version included six main categories for treatment-related problems (Indication, Effectiveness, Safety, Knowledge, Adherence and Miscellaneous). These categories include a total of nine subcategories and a total of 29 treatment related problems. CONCLUSION: The treatment-related problems assessment and classification tool introduced in this paper was applied to actual patient cases and proved to be valid. This tool also has several features that are new.

Adverse Drug Reaction Reporting Systems↗
PubMed2005

Development, reliability and validity of a new measure of overall health for pre-school children.

BACKGROUND: Few comprehensive systems are available for assessing and reporting the overall health of preschool children. OBJECTIVES: (i) To develop a multi-dimension health status classification system (HSCS) to describe pre-school (PS) children 2.5-5 years of age; (ii) to report reliability and validity of the newly developed measure. DESIGN: Existing systems (Health Utilities Index, Mark 2 and 3) were adapted for application to a pre-school population. The new system was tested for acceptability, validity and reliability. PARTICIPANTS: Three cohorts of children and their parents from Canada and Australia were utilized: Cohort 1 (MAC)-101 3-years old very low birthweight (VLBW, <1500 g) and 50 same age term children from Canada; Cohort 2 (AUS)-150 VLBW 3-years old from Australia; Cohort 3 (OMG)-222 3-years old with cerebral palsy (CP) from Ontario. METHODS: Parental intra-rater reliability was evaluated by completion of the HSCS-PS Parent questionnaire (MAC) at the clinic visit and again 14 days later. Health professionals (MAC) completed the HSCS-PS Clinician questionnaire. Percent agreement and Kappa values were used to assess parent-clinician agreement. Concurrent validity was tested in two populations of VLBW children (MAC and AUS) and a reference group of term children (MAC) by exploring the relationships between dimensions of the HSCS-PS and well-recognized norm-referenced measures: the Bayley Scales of Infant Development (BSID-II), the Vineland Adaptive Behavior Scales (VABS) and the Stanford-Binet (SB). Construct validity was tested by comparing ratings on both the HSCS-PS and the Gross Motor Function classification system (GMFCS) using a population of pre-school children with CP. Analyses were done using chi2, ANOVA and correlations with tau-b statistic. RESULTS: The HSCS-PS has 12 dimensions and 3-5 levels per dimension. Response rate for parental intra-rater reliability was 95%, with percent agreement ranging between 86 and 100%. Kappa values for various dimensions ranged from 0.38 to 1.00. Inter-rater reliability between parents and clinicians showed agreement ranging from 72 to 100%. Kappa values ranged from 0.30 to 1.00. CONCURRENT VALIDITY: There was a statistically significant gradient between HSCS-PS Mobility levels and motor scale scores of the BSID-II and VABS. A significant gradient also occurred when comparing HSCS-PS cognition levels to psychometric scores on the BSID-II and SB, as well as HSCS-PS self-care levels compared to VABS Daily Living scores. DISCRIMINATIVE AND CONSTRUCT VALIDITY: Birthweight category was shown to be a significant determinant of proportion of children with multiple HSCS-PS dimensions affected. In addition, HSCS-PS dimension levels were congruent with GMFCS levels where expected: mobility had excellent correlation; self-care, dexterity, speech and cognitive dimensions had moderate correlations. CONCLUSIONS: The HSCS-PS is readily accepted, quick to complete, widely applicable and provides a multi-dimensional description of health status. Preliminary assessments of reliability and validity are promising. The HSCS-PS can discriminate across populations by birthweight and shows strong relationships with standardized psychometric measures in comparable domains. It can pro- vide a summary profile of functional limitations in various populations of pre-school children in a consistent manner across programs and in different settings.

Australia↗
PubMed2005

Development and validation of a new health-related quality of life instrument for patients with sinusitis.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: There are few validated measures of sinusitis-specific health-related quality of life (HRQL). This study used patient focus and pretesting groups followed by a prospective cohort study to develop and validate a HRQL instrument for patients with sinusitis. METHODS: Instrument development involved a systematic literature review, use of expert input, and patient focus and pretesting groups. Patients were recruited from the practices of primary care providers and otolaryngologists. The derived survey instrument then underwent prospective testing in patients with acute sinusitis, chronic sinusitis, allergic rhinitis, and asymptomatic controls. Reduced item scales of the original instrument were developed for symptom frequency and bothersomeness. The psychometric properties of the survey instrument were evaluated for reliability, construct validity, responsiveness, and interpretability. RESULTS: In the prospective study, 47 patients with acute sinusitis and 50 patients with chronic sinusitis were compared to 18 patients with allergic rhinitis and 60 patients without nasal symptoms. Forty-three (91.5%) patients with acute sinusitis completed the questionnaire at baseline and at 1-month follow-up. Internal consistency was high for the symptom impact scale for acute and chronic sinusitis patients. The symptom frequency and especially bothersomeness scales had lower internal consistency particularly for acute sinusitis patients. Reproducibility among surgical patients retested prior to their procedure was good for each scale. A high degree of disciminant validity was demonstrated when comparing sinusitis patients to other groups, and a high degree of convergent validity was seen when the new measures were compared to other HRQL measures at baseline. Among patients with acute sinusitis, the responsiveness and interpretability of the symptom frequency, bothersomeness and impact scales were excellent. CONCLUSIONS: This study developed and validated a new sinusitis-specific HRQL instrument. The instrument included symptom frequency, bothersomeness and impact scales. It was shown to be valid in patients with acute and chronic sinusitis, and highly responsive and interpretable in acute sinusitis patients managed in the primary care setting.

Acute Disease↗
PubMed2005

Development and validation of a music performance anxiety inventory for gifted adolescent musicians.

Music performance anxiety (MPA) is a distressing experience for musicians of all ages, yet the empirical investigation of MPA in adolescents has received little attention to date. No measures specifically targeting MPA in adolescents have been empirically validated. This article presents findings of an initial study into the psychometric properties and validation of the Music Performance Anxiety Inventory for Adolescents (MPAI-A), a new self-report measure of MPA for this group. Data from 381 elite young musicians aged 12-19 years was used to investigate the factor structure, internal reliability, construct and divergent validity of the MPAI-A. Cronbach's alpha for the full measure was .91. Factor analysis identified three factors, which together accounted for 53% of the variance. Construct validity was demonstrated by significant positive relationships with social phobia (measured using the Social Phobia Anxiety Inventory [Beidel, D. C., Turner, S. M., & Morris, T. L. (1995). A new inventory to assess childhood social anxiety and phobia: The Social Phobia and Anxiety Inventory for Children. Psychological Assessment, 7(1), 73-79; Beidel, D. C., Turner, S. M., & Morris, T. L. (1998). Social Phobia and Anxiety Inventory for Children (SPAI-C). North Tonawanda, NY: Multi-Health Systems Inc.]) and trait anxiety (measured using the State Trait Anxiety Inventory [Spielberger, C. D. (1983). State-Trait Anxiety Inventory STAI (Form Y). Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press, Inc.]). The MPAI-A demonstrated convergent validity by a moderate to strong positive correlation with an adult measure of MPA. Discriminant validity was established by a weaker positive relationship with depression, and no relationship with externalizing behavior problems. It is hoped that the MPAI-A, as the first empirically validated measure of adolescent musicians' performance anxiety, will enhance and promote phenomenological and treatment research in this area.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2004

A Chinese version of the Sleep Apnea Quality of Life Index was evaluated for reliability, validity, and responsiveness.

OBJECTIVE: Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is a common disorder in many ethnic populations. Patients with OSA have impaired health-related quality of life (HRQOL). No sleep apnea-specific HRQOL measure has been validated in Chinese patients. STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING: A cross-sectional sample of 106 Chinese OSA patients and a longitudinal sample of 51 patients in Hong Kong completed a Chinese (Cantonese) version of SAQLI for assessment of its acceptability, scaling assumptions, reliability, validity, and responsiveness. RESULTS: The instrument was understood and seen as relevant by 97% of subjects. Internal consistency, test-retest reliability, item-scale convergent validity and discriminatory validity, and construct validity were good to excellent. Construct validity was confirmed by significant correlations with SF-36 subscale scores. However, factor analysis showed that only items of daily functioning and symptom domains all loaded on the hypothesized scales. Longitudinal data showed that SAQLI was more responsive than SF-36 to changes after treatment. CONCLUSION: Hence, this version of SAQLI was an acceptable, psychometrically valid, and responsive HRQOL measure for evaluating impact of illness and treatment effectiveness in Chinese OSA patients.

Adult↗
PubMed2005

Validation of surgical site infection surveillance data in Scotland.

Validation of surveillance data is necessary to ensure its scientific credibility, to identify methodological problems within the surveillance programme, to help increase compliance and participation in the surveillance programme, and to identify data quality issues at local level. Surgical site infection surveillance (SSIS) in Scotland has been implemented in collaboration between Health Protection Scotland (HPS) and staff in acute divisions in Scotland. A team at HPS carried out a study to validate the SSIS data reported to them. The aims of the validation study were: (i) to measure the completeness of the denominator data; (ii) to measure the accuracy of all SSIS data items reported to HPS; and (iii) to determine the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) of the SSIs reported to HPS against the SSIs validated as part of this study. The methodology utilized for validation of SSIS data was based on an evaluation research approach. The evaluation research approach involves a range of investigative activities, aimed at judging the worth of a programme or practice, and measures SSIS in terms of structure, process and outcome. The completeness of the denominator and the means of identifying eligible patients was identified. Descriptive information about how SSIS data were collected and managed at hospital level was collated, and the accuracy and completeness of the reported SSIS data were measured by case note review of selected cases. SSIS data from 27 hospitals in 15 acute divisions and one special health board were validated. The results indicated that a total of 91% of the procedures carried out (denominator) during a specified three-month period were reported to HPS. The case notes validated over 90% of records reported to HPS; however, there was variation in data quality between hospitals. The sensitivity, specificity, PPV and NPV of the SSIs reported to HPS were 96.7, 99.0, 94.6 and 99.4%, respectively. Where problems with data were identified at local level, hospitals have been offered guidance to improve their data. As a result of this study, HPS are confident that the Scottish SSIS data are reliable and robust.

Cross Infection↗
PubMed2004

An in vitro evaluation of the reliability and validity of an electronic pantograph by testing with five different articulators.

STATEMENT OF PROBLEM: The degree of reliability and validity of a new electronic pantographic instrument, the Cadiax Compact, has not been established. PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to test the reliability and validity of the electronic pantograph in calculating condylar settings for 5 different articulators (Denar D5A, Denar Mark II, Whip Mix 8500, Hanau Modular, and Panadent PCH). MATERIAL AND METHODS: Pantograph sensors were mounted to each articulator with custom-made mounting devices. Border movements were made on each articulator with known condylar settings to produce readings at 3-, 5-, and 10-mm condylotrack distances. The condylar settings investigated included horizontal condylar inclination (HCI), immediate mandibular lateral translation (IMLT), progressive mandibular lateral translation (PMLT), top wall, and rear wall. Reliability was assessed by the relative size of standard deviations. Validity was tested with 1-way analysis of variance and the Tukey HSD Test (alpha=.05). RESULTS: The reliability readings for the condylar settings at the 10-mm condylotrack distance, for the most part, were more consistent than those at the 5-mm distance, which, in turn, were more consistent than those at the 3-mm distance. When there were exceptions to this trend, the differences in standard deviations were very small (0.006 mm for IMLT, 0.03 and 0.12 degrees for HCI). When comparing validity between the condylotrack distances, the smallest deviations, in general, were found at the 10-mm distance, the next smallest at the 5-mm distance, and the largest, at the 3-mm distance for HCI. For PMLT, in general, the 10-mm and 5-mm deviations were smaller than the 3-mm deviation. For IMLT, there was no significant difference between the 3-, 5-, and 10-mm deviations. In analyzing validity between the articulators, the smallest deviations from the preset values, in general, were found with the Denar Mark II. CONCLUSION: The standard deviations for assessing reliability and the mean deviations for assessing validity were both relatively small in comparison to the average values of the condylar determinants. Therefore, the electronic pantograph was determined to be both reliable and valid.

Analysis of Variance↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Validation of a motor activity system by a robotically controlled vehicle and using standard reference compounds.

INTRODUCTION: A series of experiments were undertaken to evaluate the accuracy, precision, specificity, and sensitivity of an automated, infrared photo beam-based open field motor activity system, the MotorMonitor v. 4.01, Hamilton-Kinder, LLC, for use in a good laboratory practices (GLP) Safety Pharmacology laboratory. METHODS: This evaluation consisted of two phases: (1) system validation, employing known inputs using the EM-100 Controller Photo Beam Validation System, a robotically controlled vehicle representing a rodent and (2) biologic validation, employing groups of rats treated with the standard pharmacologic agents diazepam or D-amphetamine. The MotorMonitor's parameters that described the open-field activity of a subject were: basic movements, total distance, fine movements, x/y horizontal ambulations, rearing, and total rest time. These measurements were evaluated over a number of zones within each enclosure. RESULTS: System validation with the EM-100 Controller Photo Beam Validation System showed that all the parameters accurately and precisely measured what they were intended to measure, with the exception of fine movements and x/y ambulations. Biologic validation using the central nervous system depressant diazepam at 1, 2, or 5 mg/kg, i.p. produced the expected dose-dependent reduction in rat motor activity. In contrast, the central nervous system stimulant D-amphetamine produced the expected increases in rat motor activity at 0.1 and 1 mg/kg, i.p, demonstrating the specificity and sensitivity of the system. DISCUSSION: Taken together, these studies of the accuracy, precision, specificity, and sensitivity show the importance of both system and biologic validation in the evaluation of an automated open field motor activity system for use in a GLP compliant laboratory.

Amphetamine↗
PubMed2006

A validated tool for gaining insight into clinicians' preventive medicine behaviors and beliefs: the preventive medicine attitudes and activities questionnaire (PMAAQ).

OBJECTIVE: This article describes the development, reliability, and validity of the Preventive Medicine Attitudes and Activities Questionnaire (PMAAQ). METHOD: From 1995 to 2003, the PMAAQ was administered to 353 residents at six primary care residency programs in the United States. Validity was demonstrated in four ways: content validity through an expert panel, calculation of internal consistency reliabilities, demonstration of divergent validity, and external validation using a pre-existent chart review dataset. Stability measures were also calculated. RESULTS: High internal consistency reliabilities among the eight scales were seen (Cronbach's alpha = 0.74 to 0.98). Divergent validity was demonstrated by low to moderate intercorrelations among scales (r = -0.23 to 0.54). Significant correlations were seen between several PMAAQ scales and scales created from chart review data. Two-month test-retest correlations ranged from r = 0.56 to 0.87. Results suggest that clinicians' attitudes alone are not directly responsible for behaviors. CONCLUSION: The PMAAQ can validly and reliably measure residents' prevention behaviors and provide insight into their preventive healthcare attitudes. This survey could be useful in targeting areas for interventions to improve delivery of clinical preventive services, as a means of evaluating the effectiveness of such interventions, or as a quality assurance tool to monitor physician prevention activities.

Female↗
PubMed2003

Reliability, validity, and responsiveness of the modified Kapandji index for assessment of functional mobility of the rheumatoid hand.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the reliability, validity, and responsiveness of the modified Kapandji index (MKI). DESIGN: Prospective study. A cohort of patients planned for surgery of the wrist and/or fingers was evaluated within 48 hours before surgery and at least 6 months after surgery. SETTING: Patients were in hospitalized or private care in France. PARTICIPANTS: Patients with rheumatoid arthritis according to criteria of the American College of Rheumatology. Forty-two patients (36 women; mean age, 57.5y; range, 22-80y) were included in the reliability study. Fifty patients (42 women; mean age, 54.18y; range, 19-77y) were included in the validity study. INTERVENTIONS: Not applicable. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Clinical outcome measures included the MKI, the overall mobility score of the wrist and fingers, the finger mobility score, a visual analog scale (VAS) of pain in the hands and wrists, morning stiffness duration, total score of tenderness, total score of swelling, grip and pinch strength, the Hand Functional Index (HFI), and the Cochin rheumatoid hand disability scale. Reliability was studied with the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and the Bland and Altman method. Convergent and divergent validity were assessed with the Spearman correlation coefficient. Responsiveness was assessed by the paired t test, the effect size, and the standardized response mean (SRM). RESULTS: Interobserver reliability was good with an ICC of.90, and the Bland and Altman analysis showed homogeneous distribution of the differences, with no systematic trend. The MKI correlated well with the other mobility measures (HFI, the finger mobility score measured with the finger goniometer), indicating a good convergent validity, and the expected divergent validity with the other outcome measures (grip and pinch strength, total score of swelling, total score of Ritchie Articular Index, Cochin scale, VAS of pain) was observed. The 50 patients in the validity study were evaluated twice, before and after surgery, at a mean interval +/- standard deviation of 7.16+/-2.10 months (range, 6-15mo). Thirty-six patients (72%) were very satisfied or satisfied with the results of surgery, 7 (14%) were not satisfied or dissatisfied, and 7 (14%) were dissatisfied or very dissatisfied. The SRM and effect size values of the MKI were -.19 and -.10, respectively. Individual changes in the score had the best correlation (r(s)=.51) with overall patient satisfaction. CONCLUSIONS: The MKI has excellent validity and reliability. Individual changes in the score are clinically relevant. This index can be used in clinical practice and in therapeutic trials; it needs further study concerning its use for hand surgery.

Activities of Daily Living↗