Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Prosthesis Retention”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 379 records · Page 21Linked to original sources
PubMedDate not supplied

Survival analysis of endosseous implants in grafted and nongrafted edentulous maxillae.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to analyze and compare the survival rates of endosseous implants placed in the edentulous maxillae of patients in whom bone augmentation was undertaken prior to or in conjunction with implant placement with survival rates in patients who did not undergo bone augmentation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study included 2 retrospective patient groups: the graft group, which included 64 patients with 437 implants, and the nongraft group, which included 118 patients with 683 implants. The patients were treated consecutively between 1990 and 1996. In addition, the retrospective patient groups were also followed prospectively using a standardized clinical and radiographic study design. RESULTS: The implant survival rate was 75.1% for the graft group and 84.0% for the nongraft group after a mean follow-up of 5 to 6 years, a statistically significant difference. However, there was no difference with regard to the prosthesis survival rate, and after reoperation, more grafted patients had a fixed prosthesis at the end of the study (87.5% versus 85.3%). Implant failure appeared to be related to the original jawbone volume in the anterior regions. In the premolar region, where the inlay graft technique was used, the implant survival rate for the graft group was comparable to that of the nongraft group. The graft group had significantly more failures than the nongraft group in the incisor region, but not in the canine, premolar, or molar regions. DISCUSSION: The majority of implant failures occurred before loading. Occlusal overload during the healing period may have been a causative factor. CONCLUSIONS: The overall implant survival rate was lower in grafted maxillae than in nongrafted maxillae after a mean of 5 to 6 years of follow-up. Analysis revealed that jawbone volume in the anterior regions at the start of treatment was directly related to implant survival rates in both groups: the greater the volume, the higher the survival rate. Moreover, the implant survival rate was similar in grafted posterior edentulous maxillae of classes V and VI and in nongrafted posterior edentulous maxillae of classes III and IV.

Adult↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Immediate loading of 190 endosseous dental implants: a prospective observational study of 40 patient treatments with up to 2-year data.

PURPOSE: The present study was undertaken to determine the feasibility of using primary stability as a predictor of implant success in patients whose implants were immediately loaded. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study included 40 patients, in whom a total of 190 implants were placed, 102 in maxillary sites and 88 in mandibular sites. All were loaded within 72 hours of placement. Sixteen patients were completely edentulous in the mandible and/or the maxilla. The remaining 24, who were partially edentulous, received fixed partial dentures or single-implant restorations. All of the definitive implant restorations were screw retained. The criterion for loading was clinical judgment of primary stability, verified by a "screw test." Impressions were made after implant placement to facilitate the fabrication of a laboratory-made heat-processed provisional restoration from acrylic resin. Following a 4-month period for osseointegration and soft tissue healing, definitive fixed prostheses were fabricated. RESULTS: There were no surgical complications. After 1 to 2 years, all 190 implants had survived and were considered 100% successful, as determined by independent testing of mobility and radiographic evidence of osseointegration. In 4 patients, fracture of the provisional restoration occurred during the healing period. DISCUSSION: Clinical research has shown that immediate loading is a viable treatment modality. The favorable success rate reported in this study for rough-surfaced implants suggests that adherence to a protocol, an important parameter of which is primary stability above 32 Ncm, can lead to osseointegration. CONCLUSION: The results of this limited investigation suggest that patients who are partially or completely edentulous may be immediately restored with implants and fixed provisional restorations, provided that the dental implants are adequately stable immediately after their surgical placement. This alternative therapeutic approach did not appear to affect the up-to-2-year survival of the implants in this patient population.

Adolescent↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Immediate implant placement and provisionalization using implants with an internal connection.

Single-tooth implant restoration has evolved from traditional two-stage surgical procedures to techniques that allow implant placement and provisionalization immediately following tooth extraction. Restorative success using an immediately provisionalized implant system is based upon adherence to several clinical and biological parameters. This article will discuss the clinical and restorative considerations that must be addressed when immediately loading single-tooth implants. Four cases are presented demonstrating the clinical versatility of an immediate implant system for predictable and aesthetic restoration of the posterior region.

Adult↗
PubMedDate not supplied

A short-term clinical evaluation of immediately restored maxillary TiOblast single-tooth implants.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the short-term clinical outcome of single-tooth implants placed in the maxilla and immediately restored using cementless friction-fit temporary crowns. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty-five patients consecutively referred to a private specialist practice for the replacement of failing or missing maxillary teeth were treated by means of immediate temporization of their single-tooth implants. Where teeth were still present, implants were placed immediately following extraction. Provisional crowns were fabricated on a special friction-fit coping by means of autopolymerizing acrylic resin. Definitive crowns were placed a mean of 4.5 months after surgery. Implant survival was recorded along with the level of the marginal bone relative to a fixed reference point 1 year after placement. Any adverse soft tissue changes were also noted. RESULTS: A total of 28 Astra Tech ST dental implants were placed. The overall survival rate at the end of the study was 96.4% for implants which were in function for periods ranging from 15.7 to 27 months. One patient, a smoker, lost 1 implant within 1 month of surgery. Mean marginal bone loss was 0.40 mm (range 0 to 1.53 mm) 1 year after placement of the implants. Many implants (37.5%) had no observed bone loss. No implants or crowns have been lost during the functional loading period. One implant was associated with an unfavorable recession of soft tissues; however, most maintained an esthetic gingival architecture. Eleven of 28 provisional restorations needed treatment; 6 required replacement during the temporization period, and 5 required cementation because of looseness. The ease of removal of the crowns allowed regular access for irrigation with chlorhexidine and thus maintenance of soft tissue health. DISCUSSION: The need to provide provisional restorations for single-tooth gaps often presents challenges. An immediate temporary partial denture or adhesive prosthesis may be unacceptable or impractical. The current study describes a simple method for the immediate temporization of single-tooth implants. The results did not indicate any negative influence on osseointegration or short-term survival once the implants were functionally loaded. CONCLUSION: Immediate temporization of maxillary single-tooth implants can be both safe and predictable, and it appears that the procedure can yield favorable soft tissue esthetics.

Acrylic Resins↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Stability of the screw joints in patients with implant-supported fixed prostheses in edentulous jaws: a 1-year follow-up study.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this follow-up study was to evaluate the stability of the screw joint in edentulous patients 1 year after treatment with implant-supported fixed prostheses (Brånemark system). MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 20 patients were included, 10 treated in the maxilla and 10 in the mandible. The fixed prostheses were removed approximately 1 year after insertion, and the stability of the screw joints was evaluated using a rating scale based upon the CDA quality evaluation criteria of dental care. RESULTS: All implant-supported fixed prostheses were recorded as stable before the prosthetic screws (gold screws) were unscrewed. "Unacceptable loosening" was observed in 4% of the prosthetic screws and in 29% of the abutment screws. CONCLUSION: In this study, only a few of the prosthetic screws showed unacceptable loosening after 1 year of function. The clinical relevance of the observed high occurrence of loose abutment screws could be questioned, as all fixed prostheses were initially recorded as stable.

Aged↗
PubMedDate not supplied

A survey of the use of mandibular implant overdentures in 10 countries.

PURPOSE: This preliminary international survey compared provision of implant-retained overdentures to fixed implant-supported prostheses for edentulous mandibles. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Questionnaires based on a 2001 Swedish study were sent to prosthodontists and specialist clinics in nine additional countries. RESULTS: Response rate varied from 53% to 100% in 10 national surveys and should allow careful comparison of results. The relationship between implant overdentures and fixed implant-supported prostheses in treatment of edentulous mandibles varied much; in Sweden, the proportion of overdentures was 12%, whereas it was 93% in The Netherlands. In all countries, the most common reason for choice of the overdenture was reduced cost. In all but two countries, the majority of respondents thought that patients with implant overdentures were equally or more satisfied with overdentures as those with fixed implant-supported prostheses. CONCLUSION: There were great differences among the 10 countries in choice of implant treatment of the edentulous mandible. The relative proportion of mandibular overdentures to fixed prostheses was low in Sweden and Greece and varied from one to two thirds in the other countries, except The Netherlands.

Canada↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Six-month performance of implants with oxidized and machined surfaces restored at 2, 4, and 6 weeks postimplantation in adult beagle dogs.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to compare machined-surface implants (control) and oxidized-surface titanium screw-type implants (test) loaded with fixed partial dentures at 2, 4, and 6 weeks postplacement in terms of implant survival and stability. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The beagle model was chosen for the study. Four mandibular premolars were extracted bilaterally from each dog. After 2 months of healing, 4 implants were placed in each dog. Half of the dogs (n = 6), the test group, received oxidized-surface implants; the other half (n = 6), the control group, received machined-surface implants. In each group, 2 dogs were randomly assigned to a 2-week preloading healing period, 2 to a 4-week period, and 2 to a 6-week period. Three implants were loaded in each dog; 1 was left unloaded as a control. Clinical stability and survival were monitored every 2 weeks for 6 months. RESULTS: Failures were noted only among the implants assigned to the 2- and 4-week groups. Failures accounted for 9.4% (9/96) of the implants--12.5% (6/48) of the control implants and 6.3% (3/48) of the test implants. One hundred percent prosthesis stability was noted for the test-surface implant group. Stability of the test implants was significantly better than stability of the control implants (-2.6 vs -1.7, P < .05). Mean Periotest values at loading were 3.7 for the group loaded at 2 weeks, 1.6 for the group loaded at 4 weeks, and 0.6 for the group loaded at 6 weeks. Fifty percent of the 6-week group, 25% of the 4-week group, and 12.5% of the 2-week group had a Periotest value < 0 at loading. DISCUSSION: The results reveal a qualitative difference in performance between the implant groups. Twice as many failures occurred in the control group, few failures occurred following loading, and no failures occurred after 4 weeks postplacement. The survival curves for both implants were flat after 4 weeks; however, the duration of follow-up may hide effects of time-dependent factors on survival and poses a concern for clinical inference. CONCLUSIONS: Early loading of both implant types was well tolerated, as only 2 failures occurred following loading. A subsequent report will review these outcomes along with histomorphometric data collected at 6 months to better understand the significance of tissue-level implant-surface interaction for survival and stability.

Analysis of Variance↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Incorporating retrievability in fixed implant-supported prostheses by transverse fixation in the ITI abutment system.

This article describes the use of the ITI implant system in rehabilitation of the maxillary anterior sextant of a 41-year-old patient. The Syn-Octa TS abutment system was used in this case, along with a customized transfer aid for intraoral positioning of these elements. This system offers the advantage of retrievability of the prosthesis in multiunit cases.

Adult↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Immediate loading with fixed screw-retained provisional restorations in edentulous jaws: the pickup technique.

PURPOSE: This article describes (a) an immediate loading technique in the treatment of edentulous arches with screw-retained provisional restorations and (b) the effort to determine whether the described technique is compatible with the predictable achievement of osseointegration. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Eight patients with either 1 or 2 edentulous arches were treated. A diagnostic tooth arrangement was carried out for each patient and was then duplicated twice to fabricate a provisional template and a surgical guide. Six to 10 solid-screw ITI implants were placed around the dental arch to reach the first molar regions. On the same day, all patients received splinted metal-free screw-retained provisional restorations according to the pickup technique. The provisional prostheses were retrieved every 2 weeks during the healing phase. RESULTS: Seventy-eight implants were placed in 11 edentulous arches. Two implants were not immediately loaded because of inadequate primary stability. In an 8- to 20-month follow-up period (mean 14 months), two 8-mm implants were lost after 5 weeks of functional loading, resulting in an overall survival rate of 97.4%. All implants were assessed by resonance frequency analysis. After 4 months of functional loading, the mean implant stability quotient was 60+/-4.1 units (range 51 to 72 ISQ units) for maxillary implants and 65+/-6.5 units (range 47 to 74 ISQ units) for mandibular implants. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION: The immediate loading of implants placed in edentulous arches with screw-retained 1-piece (cross-arch) provisional restorations does not appear to jeopardize the achievement of osseointegration. Neither the metal-free design of the provisional prostheses nor the removal of the provisional prostheses during the healing phase adversely affected osseointegration. The pickup technique for immediate provisionalization represents a reproducible treatment option.

Adolescent↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Immediate provisional restoration of Osseotite implants: a clinical report of 18-month results.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to assess the survival rates and interproximal bone levels for Osseotite implants that were restored with fixed provisional crowns without occlusion immediately after implant placement. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Ninety-three implants were placed in 38 partially edentulous patients. All implants were immediately restored with prefabricated abutments and cement-retained provisional crowns without centric or eccentric occlusal contacts. The implants were restored with definitive restorations approximately 8 to 12 weeks after implant placement. All patients included in the study were followed for at least 18 months after implant placement (average 20.3 months). RESULTS: Seventy-seven of the 93 implants satisfied the inclusion criteria. Seventy-five implants became osseointegrated. The overall survival rate was 97.4%. Radiographic bone loss 18 months after implant placement (the mean of both interproximal surfaces) was 0.76 mm. The exact binomial confidence interval was 0.32% to 9.07%. For the exact binomial test with the null hypothesis proportion = .05, P was .3334 and was not statistically significant. DISCUSSION: Immediate nonocclusal loading of single-unit dental implants differs from immediate loading of multiple, splinted implants. Unsplinted, restored implants without occlusal loading may still be subject to lateral and occlusal loads secondary to the proximate location of the food bolus. Immediate restoration of dental implants significantly reduces treatment time and may be beneficial in reducing the morbidity associated with loss of teeth, contraction of the alveolus, and loss of interdental papillae associated with the traditional method of treatment following tooth loss. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study suggest that immediate restoration of Osseotite implants can be accomplished with results that are similar to the results obtained with the traditional 1- or 2-stage surgical, unloaded healing protocols.

Adolescent↗
PubMedDate not supplied

The extremely resorbed mandible: a comparative prospective study of 2-year results with 3 treatment strategies.

PURPOSE: The aim of this prospective clinical study was to compare the clinical and radiographic results of 3 modes of implant treatment in combination with an overdenture in patients with extremely resorbed mandibles. The 3 treatment strategies used were a transmandibular implant, augmentation of the mandible with an autologous bone graft followed by placement of 4 endosseous implants, and the placement of 4 endosseous implants only. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Sixty edentulous patients met the inclusion criteria and were assigned according to a balanced allocation method to 1 of the 3 groups. Postoperative complications, implant survival, periodontal indices, change in mandibular bone height, and prosthetic complications were assessed during a 2-year evaluation period. RESULTS: During the evaluation period significantly more implants were lost in the transmandibular implant and the augmentation groups compared to the group with endosseous implants only. Except for the Bleeding Index and the Periotest values, the periodontal parameters did not differ significantly among the groups. In all 3 groups, there was no significant bone loss at most locations. Minimal prosthetic retreatment was necessary. DISCUSSION: Although implant loss is a frequently used outcome measure for success, the necessity of retreatment seems to be of more relevance for both the patient and the clinician. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study suggested that patients with extremely resorbed mandibles can be treated with implants alone in this patient population.

Alveolar Bone Loss↗
PubMed2004

[Immediate loading of dental implants in partialful edentulous and edentulous jaws].

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the clinical feasibility and technical characteristics of immediate loading and to access the short-term clinical results of treatment. METHODS: This study included 3 completely edentulous patients and 24 patients who were partially edentulous from March 1999 to December 2003. 21 implants were immediately loaded and provided support for mandibular overdenture for 3 fully edentulous patients. 30 implants were placed in 21 partially edentulous patients and implants were immediate loaded in edentulous mandibular providing support for fixed provisional prosthesis within 6 months. Then, metal-ceramic crowns were completed. All patients were followed up by 1, 3, 6, 12 months and the patients were checked every 12 months. RESULTS: A total of 42 implants were loaded immediately. From March 1999 to December 2003, no implants were lost during follow-up (range 3 to 49 months, mean of 28 months). No infections, nerve or sinus damage or other sequelae occurred. No implants exhibited peri-implant radiolucencies. Moreover, immediate loading seems to increase the ossification of the alveolar bone around endosseous implants. Patients were satisfied with the treatment. CONCLUSIONS: The data and the experience described in this study indicate that immediate loading with restorations using appropriate surgical and restorative techniques can predicate the completely edentulous and partially edentulous mandible in some cases. Further study is needed to determine the long-term result of immediately loaded implants.

Adult↗
PubMed2004

Prospective clinical evaluation of dental implants with sand-blasted, large-grit, acid-etched surfaces loaded 6 weeks after surgery.

Twenty implants with sand-blasted, large-grit, acid-etched (SLA) surfaces (ITI Dental System) were followed up for a period of 12 months, during which the following clinical criteria were evaluated: (a) absence of persistent clinical symptoms (pain, strange sensations, or paresthesia) after the placement of implants; (b) absence of recurring peri-implant inflammation or suppuration; (c) absence of increasing mobility, tested with Periotest; and (d) absence of bone loss or radiolucency around the implants. After 12 months of follow-up, all the loaded implants, after 6 weeks of placement, were approved under all the aforementioned criteria. During the analysis of the increasing mobility, tested with Periotest, and grouping these implants according to the site of implantation (mandible or maxilla), it was possible to observe that the implants presented the same increasing mobility.

Acid Etching, Dental↗
PubMed2004

Current trends in implantology: Part 1--Biological response, implant stability, and implant design.

In implant dentistry, the loss of bone is generally caused by infection or trauma but can also be attributed to other involved factors. Innovative surgical techniques and implant components have been developed in an effort to overcome the challenges (eg, bone topography and density, primary and secondary stability, aesthetics) traditionally associated with implant-supported restorations.

Alveolar Bone Loss↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Immediate restoration of single-tooth implants in mandibular molar sites: a 12-month preliminary report.

PURPOSE: The aim of this prospective clinical study was to evaluate the survival rates at 12 months of transmucosal implants placed in the posterior mandible and immediately restored with single crowns. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty ITI dental implants with sandblasted, acid-etched surfaces were placed in 30 patients missing at least 1 mandibular molar and immediately restored if acceptable primary stability was attained. Primary stability was measured with resonance frequency analysis (RFA) using the Osstell device, and only implants with a stability quotient greater than 62 were included in the study. RFA measurement and radiographic assessment were made at baseline and 6 months after implant placement. Plaque Index, Bleeding Index, probing depth, attachment level, and width of keratinized tissue were measured at the 12 month follow-up examination. RESULTS: At 12 months, only 1 implant had been lost; it was removed because of acute infection. Radiographic as well as clinical examination confirmed osseointegration of all implants, with a survival rate of 96.7%. DISCUSSION: Interestingly, implant stability as measured using RFA did not increase significantly from baseline to 12 months (P > .05). CONCLUSION: The present study showed that immediate restoration of transmucosal implants placed in the mandibular area with good primary stability can be a safe and successful procedure. However, larger, long-term clinical trials are needed to confirm the present results.

Adult↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Immediate loading of 2 interforaminal dental implants supporting an overdenture: clinical and radiographic results after 24 months.

PURPOSE: In this study, preliminary results of immediate loading of ITI sandblasted, large-grit, acid-etched (SLA) implants with a bar-connected overdenture in the edentulous mandible are presented. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Ten edentulous patients between 48 and 74 years old were included in this study. All patients received 2 SLA-surfaced ITI solid-screw dental implants in the interforaminal region, which were loaded with a bar connector and an overdenture 1 day after implant placement. Marginal bone resorption was evaluated using periapical radiographs. Gingival health (ie, Bleeding Index) and patient satisfaction (measured using a visual analog scale) were evaluated. Follow-up time was 24 to 36 months (mean time 29.8 months) after implant loading. RESULTS: Twenty-four months after placement, none of the 20 implants had failed. Marginal bone resorption around all implants after 12 months averaged 0.71 mm, and 92% of the sites had a Bleeding Index of 0. Between 12 and 24 months, average bone resorption was an additional 0.08 mm. All patients demonstrated an improved quality of life. DISCUSSION: The amount of bone resorption was comparable to amounts reported in studies with standard loading times. The low rate of inflammation of the peri-implant soft tissue and the high level of patient satisfaction in this study demonstrate encouraging short-term results. CONCLUSION: The results suggest that immediate loading of 2 dental implants can be successful and further support the use of a rough implant surface in residual bone.

Aged↗
PubMed2004

Early and immediately restored and loaded dental implants for single-tooth and partial-arch applications.

PURPOSE: The objective of this consensus committee report was to review the available literature published predominantly in refereed journals to summarize findings, data, and conclusions as they related to reduced healing times and protocols for single-tooth and partial-arch clinical situations. Early loading of dental implants has been defined as restoration of implants in or out of occlusion at least 48 hours after implant placement, but at a shorter time interval than conventional healing. Immediate loading or restoration has been defined as attachment of a restoration in or out of direct occlusal function within 48 hours of surgical placement. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Six articles addressing early loading, with a mixture of single-tooth and partial-arch clinical conditions and including some controlled cohort studies, were reviewed. Immediate loading or restoration of dental implants in single-tooth and partial-arch applications, was extensively reviewed. An attempt was made to isolate and categorize similar case types to discern trends and relevant factors. Variables that were considered included single- or multiple-tooth conditions, immediate or delayed placement in extraction sockets, effect of implant surface and geometry, bone quality, implant stability, surgical technique, occlusal design, effect of cigarette smoking, and stability of results. RESULTS: Combined data from 6 early loading studies on single-tooth and partial-arch applications revealed 1,046 implants with a survival rate of 98.2%. Long-term data for most of the early loading studies were not yet available. Most of the publications on immediate loading or restoration of dental implants were written as case series rather than scientific studies. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS: In general, most publications indicated that with attention to appropriate factors, implant survival with immediate restoration was comparable to the results with conventional and early loading protocols. It should be recognized that, with few exceptions, these conclusions may be misleading statistical phenomena of the authors, as most publications were written by exceptionally experienced, highly skilled practitioners working under tightly controlled clinical conditions on a relatively small, statistically inconclusive number of implants and patients.

Crowns↗