Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Promegestone”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 379 records · Page 21Linked to original sources

The leucine zippers of c-fos and c-jun for progesterone receptor dimerization: A-dominance in the A/B heterodimer.

Human progesterone receptors (hPR) exist as two isoforms: 120 kDa B-receptors (hPRB) and N-terminally truncated 94 kDa A-receptors (hPRA). When transfected separately, each isoform exhibits different transcriptional properties that are ligand- and promoter-specific. In human target tissues, both receptor isoforms are present, so that a mixture of three dimeric species, A/A, A/B, and B/B, bind to DNA at progesterone response elements (PRE), and regulate transcription. To study the transcriptional phenotype of pure A/B heterodimers uncontaminated by A/A or B/B homodimers, we exploited the property of the leucine zipper (zip) domains of fos and jun, to form pure heterodimers. Chimeric constructs were made linking the zip of either c-fos or c-jun to the C-terminus of hPRB or hPRA (hPR-zip) to produce A-fos, B-fos, A-jun or B-jun. To determine whether the A- or B-isoform is functionally dominant in the A/B heterodimer, cells expressing hPR-zip chimeras were treated with the progestin antagonist RU486, which produces opposite transcriptional effects with the two isoforms. Gel mobility shift and immune co-precipitation assays show that in the presence of RU486 only pure heterodimers form between A-fos/B-jun or A-jun/B-fos, and bind DNA at PREs. Thus, in these pairs, interactions between the extrinsic fos/jun zipper domains override interactions between the intrinsic hPR dimerization domains. We find that under these conditions, antagonist-occupied B-zip homodimers stimulate transcription, while antagonist-occupied A-zip homodimers are inhibitory, and that pure A/B zip heterodimers have the inhibitory transcriptional phenotype of the A-zip homodimers. We conclude that, in pure heterodimers, A-receptors are dominant negative inhibitors of B-receptors. Additionally, the pure PR-zip heterodimers, unlike wild-type receptors, bind a PRE in the absence of hormone but do not activate transcription. Thus, PR dimerization and PRE binding are necessary but, without hormone, not sufficient to activate transcription.

Base Sequence↗

Development of specific bioluminescent in vitro assays for selecting potential antimineralocorticoids.

Efficient antimineralocorticoid selection requires a reliable, discriminating and easy assay for monitoring biological activity of not only the specific receptor, but also closely related receptors such as glucocorticoid and progestin. These related activities should be as low as possible to obtain specific antimineralocorticoid compounds. In this paper, we describe two cellular models used for easy and specific measurement of mineralocorticoid and progestin activities. These models involve the induction of firefly luciferase under hormonal control mediated by a chimeric receptor. The first model comprises transiently transfected MCF-7 cells, whereas the second uses stably transfected HeLa cells. Glucocorticoid activity was assayed with the classic tyrosine-aminotransferase induction method in HTC cells. Six compounds of a new family of 11 beta-substituted-17-spirolactone steroids were thus studied and compared to control compounds. Five of them showed antimineralocorticoid activity and one was active at a concentration lower than that of mespirenone.

Animals↗

Progesterone receptor and the mechanism of action of progesterone antagonists.

Currently available progesterone antagonists have been suggested to fall into two categories based on differences in how they interact with and inactivate the progesterone receptor (PR). The anti-progestin ZK98299 (Type I) impairs PR association with DNA, while Type II compounds (RU486, ZK112993, ZK98734) promote PR binding to DNA. Type II agents, therefore, appear to inhibit receptor activity at a step downstream of DNA binding, presumably failing to induce conformational changes in PR structure requird for enhancement of transcription. This paper discusses both published and unpublished data supporting the concept of two types of progestin antagonists. Using PR-mediated induction of reporter genes in breast cancer cells as an assay for biological response, both types of anti-progestins, after correction for difference in steroid binding affinity, inhibit progestin induction substoichiometrically. However, Type II anti-progestins are more potent, inhibiting at lower ratios of antagonist to agonist than ZK98299. This suggests that in addition to behaving by classical competitive mechanisms these compounds (in particular Type II) may exhibit additional activity as transrepressors of PR in the same cell bound to hormone agonist. Transrepression may occur by the combined mechanisms of heterodimerization and competition for binding to DNA. In support of this, mixed ligand dimers form readily in solution between a PR subunit bound to agonist and another bound to either type of anti-progestin, whereas these mixed ligand dimers bind poorly, if at all, to specific progesterone response elements (PREs) in vitro. Additionally, when added as a single ligand, Type II agents increase PR dimerization in solution and PR affinity for PREs as compared with single ligand dimers formed by progestin agonist. This contrasts with ZK98299, when given as a single ligand, which reduces PR affinity for PREs without disrupting solution dimerization. Thus the higher affinity of PR for PREs may account for the greater biological potency of Type II compounds as compared with ZK98299. As a further distinction between types of antiprogestins, ZK98299 minimally stimulates phosphorylation of PR whereas RU486 increases site-specific phosphorylation of PR in a manner indistinguishable from that of hormone agonist. Additionally, ZK98299 is not susceptible in vivo to functional switching to a partial agonist by cross talk with cAMP signal transduction pathways, as occurs with Type II compounds. Thus, ZK98299 under certain conditions may be a more pure antagonist than Type II compounds.

8-Bromo Cyclic Adenosine Monophosphate↗

Reptilian (Chrysemys picta) hepatic progesterone receptors: relationship to plasma steroids and the vitellogenic cycle.

In non-mammals, estrogen-induced yolk precursors produced by the adult female liver are the main nutritional source for development. Evidence exists that progesterone exerts counter-regulatory effects on estrogen-induced vitellogenesis, and we have used the turtle model (Chrysemys picta) to study changes in hepatic progesterone receptor during the vitellogenic cycle. Using radioligand methods, we show that high and lower affinity binding sites are present in the cytosolic but not nuclear extracts. The lower affinity site is detectable at all times of the year; the high affinity site is mainly observed during non-vitellogenic periods and does not correlate with plasma estrogen. DNA-cellulose chromatography shows that PR-A is present in spring, summer, and winter, and that PR-B is down-regulated except in animals which recently laid eggs. Western blots confirm the presence of PR in all months, but PR-A (88 kDa) is the dominant isoform. PR-B (125 kDa) is well correlated with the luteal phase, winter and fall. Immunocytochemical studies show that PR is nuclear in location, and nuclear heat shock protein 90 (hsp90) is present. Competitive binding studies of both sites reveal that progesterone is the most effective ligand for both, followed by pregnenolone, deoxycorticosterone, and R5020. RU 486 does not bind to the high affinity site but binds moderately well to the lower affinity site. This study suggests that progesterone receptor isoforms are differentially expressed and may be involved as transcriptional regulators of hepatic function outside the periods of active vitellogenesis in the turtle.

Animals↗

Effects of two classes of progestagens, pregnane and 19-nortestosterone derivatives, on cell growth of human breast tumor cells: I. MCF-7 cell lines.

The effects of two classes of progestagens, e.g. pregnane [Org 2058, medroxyprogesterone acetate (MPA), R5020, progesterone (PROG)] and 19-nortestosterone derived progestagens [3-ketodesogestrel (KDG), levonorgestrel (LNG), gestodene (GES), norethisterone (NE), Org 30659] on proliferation of three estradiol (E2)-dependent human breast tumor MCF-7 cell lines of different origin [Van der Burg (B), Litton bionetics (L) and McGrath (M)] were studied. The pregnane derivatives hardly stimulated cell growth at 10(-6) M in MCF-7 B and L cells except for Org 2058 in B cells, whereas in M cells a statistically significant growth induction was observed except for PROG. The 19-nortestosterone derivatives induced cell growth at doses at 10(-7) M or higher in all three cell lines. NE, GES and Org 30659 were more potent stimulators than KDG and LNG at 10(-7) M. E2 already showed maximal stimulation at 10(-10) M. For all three cell lines, the effects and ranking of the individual progestagens were similar. Antiprogestagens, like RU 38486 and Org 31710 could not block these stimulatory effects while antiestrogens like 4-hydroxytamoxifen and ICI 164,384 could. This suggests that cell growth by the above-mentioned progestagens occurs via an interaction with the estrogen receptor. Indeed, displacement studies with cytosol from MCF-7 M cells revealed that at very high concentrations NE, GES and Org 30659 were able to displace 50% of the radiolabelled E2, while KDG and LNG could not. Relative binding affinities (RBAs) were 0.010, 0.025 and 0.015% for NE, GES and Org 30659, respectively. The effect of the two classes of progestagens on cell proliferation was also investigated at several dose levels in combination with E2 (10(-10) M) in the MCF-7 B cell line. This resulted in a statistically significant inhibition of cell growth with R5020, MPA and most of the 19-nortestosterone derivatives at concentrations of 10(-8) M. Org 2058 and NE did not have any influence on E2-induced growth. The inhibitory effects could not be blocked by antiprogestagens. In summary these studies with 3 subclones of MCF-7 cells show that the pregnane derived progestagens stimulate growth only in one subclone, whereas the 19-nortestosterone derived progestagens do so in all three subclones. The progestagens possess estrogenic activity only at high pharmacological doses, being 10,000 times weaker than estradiol. In combination with estrogens most progestagens gave a reduction of E2-stimulated growth in the B subclone.

Adenocarcinoma↗

Effects of two classes of progestagens, pregnane and 19-nortestosterone derivatives, on cell growth of human breast tumor cells: II. T47D cell lines.

Two classes of progestagens, e.g. pregnane [Org 2058, progesterone (PROG), R5020, medroxyprogesterone acetate (MPA)] and 19-nortestosterone derived progestagens [norethisterone (NE), levonorgestrel (LNG), 3-ketodesogestrel (KDG), gestodene (GES), Org 30659] were studied for their effect on cell growth of two human breast tumor T47D cell lines of different origin, i.e. from ATCC (A) and Sutherland (S) et al. [Sutherland et al., Cancer Res. 48 (1988) 5084-5091]. The effect of estradiol (E2) and progestagens alone as well as the combined effect of E2 (10(-10) M) and progestagens were investigated at several dose levels. Compared with E2-induced growth at 10(-10) M, pregnane and 19-nortestosterone derived progestagens at 10(-6) M alone did enhance cell growth in T47D-A cells up to 25 and 100% respectively, whereas in T47D-S cells they did not influence growth. All these progestagens at 10(-6) M did not affect E2-induced growth in T47D-A cells, whereas in T47D-S cells they completely reduced cell proliferation at doses between 10(-10) and 10(-8) M. The involvement of progestagen (PR) and estrogen (ER) receptors with respect to growth stimulation was studied by using specific antihormones. In T47D-A cells, the antiprogestagens RU 38486 and Org 31710 could not block progestagen-induced growth. Antiestrogens, like 4-hydroxytamoxifen and ICI 164,384, inhibited the 19-nortestosterone derivative-induced cell growth by approx. 50%. Remarkably, both antiprogestagens alone could also inhibit E2-induced growth in T47D-A cells by about 50%. In T47D-S cells, E2-induced cell growth was completely blocked by both antiprogestagens and antiestrogens. Both antiprogestagens in T47D-S cells were equipotent to 4-hydroxytamoxifen and 10-fold more potent than ICI 164,384. In conclusion pregnane and 19-nortestosterone-derived progestagens stimulated cell growth in T47D-A cells at high unphysiological concentrations, whereas they did not affect cell growth in T47D-S cells. The 19-nortestosterone derivative induced growth in T47D-A cells could partially be inhibited by antiestrogens. In T47D-A cells, E2-induced cell growth was not influenced by both classes of progestagens, whereas in T47D-S cells all tested progestagens, antiprogestagens, and antiestrogens inhibited E2-induced cell growth completely. These results with T47D cells as well as those obtained previously with MCF-7 cells show that subclones of cell lines may respond differently to various types of progestagens in the presence and absence of estrogens.

Breast Neoplasms↗

Progesterone receptors: their localization, binding activity and expression in the pig oviduct during follicular and luteal phases.

Estrogens (E) and progesterone (P) are known to require their respective steroid receptors in order to exert structural and functional effects on the oviduct. Cyclic changes in progesterone receptor (PR) localization in the oviductal tissue of female pigs were determined using an immunohistochemical technique with mouse monoclonal antibody mPRI against PR. The variations observed during the estrous cycle in the progesterone receptor (PR) intensity and proportion between ampulla and isthmus probably reflect different response of these regions to progesterone. Immediately before ovulation, during follicular phase, no staining was observed in either the ampulla or the isthmus stroma. However, a low expression of PR in the epithelium of the ampulla was observed. After ovulation, during luteal phase, PR immunostaining was more intense in the whole oviduct. According to immunohistochemical assays, the binding assays for nuclear and cytosolic PR (PRn and PRc, respectively), by using [3H] R5020 at 4 degrees C for 15 h, also showed a higher specific binding during luteal phase. However, the PR mRNA in the oviduct, analyzed by RT-PCR, showed similar levels at both stages of the estrous cycle. Although this methods could not be quantitative, indicate the possibility that a post-transcriptional control could differentially regulate the PR in the pig oviduct.

Animals↗

Basis of melengestrol acetate action as a progestin.

To provide insight into potential mechanisms contributing to the various biological responses of cattle to treatment with progesterone, norgestomet, and melengestrol acetate (MGA), MCF-7 cells were utilized to determine the relative binding affinity of the progesterone receptor for MGA, norgestomet, progesterone, and a progesterone agonist (R5020), and to determine if progesterone, MGA, or norgestomet have estrogenic and/or anti-estrogenic activities. The progesterone receptor had greater affinity (P<0.05) for MGA, R5020, and norgestomet than for progesterone; and the affinity for norgestomet exceeded (P<0.05) that of MGA and R5020. Estrogen stimulates proliferation of MCF-7 cells; therefore these cells have been utilized as a bioassay to detect estrogenic and anti-estrogenic activity. Progesterone (10(-11) to 10(-5)M) did not promote cellular proliferation. However, MGA (10(-8), 10(-7), and 10(-6)M) increased (P<0.05) cell proliferation compared to the control group (10(-11) to 10(-9) and 10(-5)M MGA did not stimulate cell proliferation), and MGA-induced cell proliferation (10(-8)M) was reduced (P=0.095) by an estradiol antagonist (ICI 182,780; ICI). Cellular proliferation increased (P<0.05) with norgestomet (10(-5)M) compared to the control group (10(-11) to 10(-6)M norgestomet did not stimulate cell proliferation) and the increased proliferation was decreased (P<0.05) by ICI. Neither progesterone nor MGA demonstrated anti-estrogenic activity. Norgestomet (10(-10) to 10(-6)M) did reduce (P<0.05) maximal estrogen-stimulated cell proliferation, but not to basal levels. In summary, the affinities of the progesterone receptor for norgestomet, MGA, and progesterone are consistent with their effective dose to inhibit ovulation in vivo, but their progestin and their estrogenic/anti-estrogenic activities cannot fully explain why progesterone and norgestomet are more capable of reprogramming the reproductive axis in anestrous postpartum cows compared to MGA.

Animals↗

Differential effects of estrogens and progestins on the anticoagulant tissue factor pathway inhibitor in the rat.

Oral contraceptives (OC) and postmenopausal hormone therapy (HT) modulate plasma levels of proteins that regulate blood coagulation. It remains unclear whether the progestin component contributes to these changes. The present study was designed to determine whether progestins modulate two essential plasma anticoagulants, antithrombin (AT) and tissue factor pathway inhibitor (TFPI), in an animal model. Ovariectomized rats were treated orally with three progestins, norethindrone acetate (NETA), trimegestone (TMG), or drospirenone (DSP), either alone or combined with 17alpha-ethyinylestradiol (EE). Plasma AT levels were unchanged. However, TFPI activity was reduced by EE alone (10-100 microg/kg/day) in a dose-dependent manner; NETA (3 or 10 mg/kg/day) reduced TFPI by approximately 40 or approximately 80%, respectively, while TMG and DSP had no effect. NETA and EE effects were blocked by co-administration of ICI-182,780, an estrogen receptor antagonist, suggesting that both responses were likely estrogen receptor-mediated. Reduced TFPI after NETA or EE treatment was not accompanied by changes in TFPI mRNA levels in tissues that express TFPI, but there was a positive correlation between plasma TFPI and total cholesterol. Sex hormone effects on TFPI in this model and as reported in women may help to shift the coagulation balance to a more prothrombotic state. Progestins such as TMG and DSP that lack estrogenic activity could potentially have an improved clinical profile.

Androstenes↗

Quantitative analysis of gene regulation by seven clinically relevant progestins suggests a highly similar mechanism of action through progesterone receptors in T47D breast cancer cells.

Progesterone (P4) is an essential reproductive steroid hormone required for many aspects of female reproductive physiology. Progestins are compounds that demonstrate progesterone-like activity and are used in oral contraception, hormone therapy, and treatment of some reproductive disorders, but differ widely in their chemical structures, potency, and pharmacokinetics. While numerous studies have assessed progestins on specific endpoints, little is known about the activation of global gene expression by progestins. We used Affymetrix GeneChip U133A expression arrays to examine the action of P4 and six clinically relevant synthetic progestins (3-ketodesogestrel, drospirenone, levonorgestrel, medroxyprogesterone acetate, norethindrone acetate, and trimegestone) on the progesterone receptor (PR)-positive T47Dco and the PR-negative T47D-Y breast cancer cell lines. Excluding drospirenone, one or more of the progestins-regulated 329 genes, with 30 genes regulated by at least 2.0-fold by all progestins in the T47Dco cells. The synthetic progestins show a high degree of similarity in their transcriptional responses, and each progestin regulates between 77 and 91% of the genes regulated by P4. Independent quantitative RT-PCR analysis confirmed a similar regulation for S100P, PPL, IL20RA, NET1, ATP1A1, HIG2, and CXCL12 (SDF-1) by all seven progestins. Attempts to find differentially regulated genes by any progestin compared to all other treatments failed, suggesting any differences are quantitative, not qualitative. This analysis demonstrates a high degree of similarity among these progestins on PR-regulated gene expression in T47D cells, suggesting a similar and fairly specific mode of action.

Alkaline Phosphatase↗

Clinical experience with trimegestone as a new progestin in HRT.

Trimegestone (TMG) is a novel, 19-norpregnane progestin, which demonstrates endometrial selectivity with a reduced progestin-related side effect profile when compared to several other currently marketed progestins. TMG has been studied in combination with 17beta-estradiol (17beta-E2) and conjugated equine estrogens (CEE). TMG-containing HRT agents were effective in relieving vasomotor symptoms and providing protection from endometrial hyperplasia with < or =1% hyperplasia. In clinical trials with sequential regimens, TMG provided predictable withdrawal bleeding associated with a low incidence of irregular and prolonged bleeding. Clinical studies of continuous combined regimens of estrogen/TMG combinations demonstrated high levels of amenorrhea. Both 17beta-E2 and CEE/TMG combinations have shown improved bone mineral density and quality-of-life assessments. Both continuous combined and sequential regimens of 17beta-E2/TMG and CEE/TMG have a favorable clinical profile. TMG provides an important new option for the treatment of postmenopausal symptoms and the prevention of osteoporosis.

Adult↗

Steroid receptor profiling of vinclozolin and its primary metabolites.

Several pesticides and fungicides commonly used to control agricultural and indoor pests are highly suspected to display endocrine-disrupting effects in animals and humans. Endocrine disruption is mainly caused by the interference of chemicals at the level of steroid receptors: it is now well known that many of these chemicals can display estrogenic effects and/or anti-androgenic effects, but much less is known about the interaction of these compounds with other steroid receptors. Vinclozolin, a dicarboximide fungicide, like its primary metabolites 2-[[(3,5-dichlorophenyl)-carbamoyl]oxy]-2-methyl-3-butenoic acid (M1), and 3',5'-dichloro-2-hydroxy-2-methylbut-3-enanilide (M2), is known to bind androgen receptor (AR). Although vinclozolin and its metabolites were characterized as anti-androgens, relatively little is known about their effects on the function of the progesterone (PR), glucocorticoid (GR), mineralocorticoid (MR) or estrogen receptors (ERalpha and ERbeta). Objectives of the study were to determine the ability of vinclozolin and its two primary metabolites to activate AR, PR, GR, MR and ER. For this purpose, we used reporter cell lines bearing luciferase gene under the control of wild type or chimeric Gal4 fusion AR, PR, GR, MR or ERs. We confirmed that all three were antagonists for AR, whereas only M2 was found a partial agonist. Interestingly, M2 was also a PR, GR and MR antagonist (MR>>PR>GR) while vinclozolin was an MR and PR antagonist. Vinclozolin, M1 and M2 were agonists for both ERs with a lower affinity for ERbeta. Although the potencies of the fungicide and its metabolites are low when compared to natural ligands, their ability to act via more than one mechanism and the potential for additive or synergistic effect must be taken into consideration in the risk assessment process.

Aldosterone↗

Characterization of fatty acid synthase in cell lines derived from experimental mammary tumors.

The lipogenic enzyme fatty acid synthase (FAS) is elevated in various human primary cancers and certain human cancer cell lines. FAS overexpression in human neoplasia has clinical relevance because of its association with tumor aggression and potential chemotherapeutic intervention. Here, we surveyed FAS in cell lines established from normal murine mammary epithelium (NMuMG) and from mammary tumors induced by either rodent polyoma (Py) virus or murine mammary tumor virus (MMTV). Western blotting revealed greater content of FAS in Py-transformed A1-1 and T1 than NMuMG or MMTV-transformed Mm5MT, RIIIMT and MMT060562. These data suggest that signaling events mediated by Py transformation may increase cellular amounts of FAS. Although FAS content was elevated to similar levels in A1-1 and T1, specific activities were significantly different as enzyme activity in T1 was 3-fold higher than A1-1. Likewise, FAS activity in NMuMG was about 0.5-fold higher than the MMTV-transformed lines, even though enzyme content was similar. Immunoprecipitation studies employing anti-phosphoamino acid antibodies followed by immunoblot analysis with anti-FAS antisera (and vice versa) were used to characterize the constitutive phosphorylation state of the enzyme. Phosphoserine and phosphothreonine residues were detected in the more active FAS from T1 and NMuMG, but not in the less active FAS from Mm5MT or A1-1. Discovery of phosphorylated FAS suggests that the enzyme may have more immediate control over lipogenesis than previously thought. High-dose (10-4 M) dexamethasone induced FAS content and activity in NMuMG and MMTV-transformed lines but not Py-transformed cells. Lower concentrations (10-8, 10-6 M) of dexamethasone also activated FAS but without concomitant elevation of its protein content, which was consistent with a phosphorylated form of FAS. Finally, cell lines were treated with the FAS inhibitor cerulenin: almost all breast cancer lines were growth inhibited at significantly lower amounts of drug than normal cell lineages, suggesting that FAS plays a greater role in viability of tumor cells than normal cells. Pretreatment with palmitate (a primary end-product of FAS) prior to cerulenin rescued A1-1 cells only slightly from growth inhibition, whereas pretreatment with oleate (a monounsaturated fatty acid synthesized from palmitate) synergized cerulenin's cytotoxic effects.

Animals↗

Human progesterone A-receptors can be synthesized intracellularly and are biologically functional.

In order to investigate the origin and functional independence of the human progesterone receptor A binding protein, we have expressed a truncated human progesterone receptor cDNA in both gene transfer and in vitro translation assays. Proteins identical in size and antigenicity to the A-receptors found naturally in human progesterone target cells are synthesized from this cDNA that lacks the putative B receptor initiator methionine codon of the complete cDNA. The functional independence of A-receptors is suggested by their ability to bind hormone and to stimulate transcription from the progestin responsive mouse mammary tumor virus promoter.

Blotting, Western↗

Progestins activate vascular endothelial growth factor gene transcription in endometrial adenocarcinoma cells.

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether progestins activate vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) gene transcription in endometrial adenocarcinoma cells. DESIGN: In vitro study. SETTING: University reproductive biology laboratories. PATIENT(S): None. INTERVENTION(S): Ishikawa cells were transfected with VEGF promoter-luciferase reporter constructs and expression vectors encoding human progesterone receptors (hPR) A or B. The cells were treated with different progestins and antiprogestins, and luciferase activity was compared with controls. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Three functional progesterone response elements (PREs) in the VEGF promoter were identified by electrophoretic mobility-shift assay, and different constructs were created to assess each PRE. RESULT(S): In cells expressing hPRA or B, treatment with 10 nM R5020 or 100 nM medroxyprogesterone acetate statistically significantly increased luciferase activity (3.3- to 4.8-fold). Pretreatment with 100 nM RU486 blunted the effect of 10 nM R5020, resulting only in a slight, statistically nonsignificant increase in luciferase activity (1.3- to 1.7-fold). Although three different functional PREs could be identified, no single PRE accounted for the preponderance of the luciferase activity. Full VEGF promoter activation required all three PREs. CONCLUSION(S): Progestins have a direct effect on VEGF gene transcription. However, hPR-mediated transcriptional regulation of the VEGF promoter is complex and cannot be localized to confined PRE sequences. Other response element motifs are likely to play a contributory role.

Adenocarcinoma↗

Binding of estrogen and progestin in the human fallopian tube.

The estrogen and progestin receptor concentrations in the human fallopian tube have been investigated. The binding of estrogen and progestin to their cytoplasmic and nuclear receptor proteins were of high affinity and specificity. The cytoplasmic and nuclear receptor concentrations in the isthmus, ampulla, and fimbria did not differ significantly. The nuclear progestin receptor concentrations in the isthmus and fimbriae were significantly higher (P less than 0.05) in the follicular phase than in the luteal phase of the menstrual cycle. In the postmenopausal tubes the receptor concentrations was low, whereas the progestin receptor concentration was quite high.

Cell Nucleus↗