Abdominal palpation during pregnancy.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
SEARCH · Search PubMed
Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.
Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Twenty consecutive patients with breast cancer were evaluated following chemotherapy using MRI to assess the size of cancer residua and compare these data with subsequent histologic measurements of the viable tumor. This retrospective study also involved assessment of the preoperative size of the malignancy as determined by physical exam and x-ray mammogram. These values were later compared with the histology. The tumor size correlation coefficient between MRI and pathologic analysis was the highest, at 0.93. Physical exam and x-ray mammography (available for 17 patients) produced correlation coefficients of 0.72 and 0.63, respectively, compared to histologic measurement. The accuracy of MRI did not vary with the size of cancer residua. MRI is an accurate method for preoperative assessment of breast cancer residua following chemotherapy. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2001;13:868-875.
Ultrasonography of the prostate detects some cancers that are not palpable, but the pathologic features of such cancers have not been well described. Since screening trials consistently find sonography more sensitive (though less specific) than digital rectal examination, nonpalpable cancers that are visible as hypoechoic lesions on ultrasound have been postulated to be early cancers of limited malignant potential and may not require aggressive treatment. To test this hypothesis, we determined the pathologic features and DNA ploidy value of prostate cancers in 63 radical prostatectomy specimens taken from patients with clinical stage T1 (n = 28) and T2 (n = 35) prostate cancer. In 40 patients (63%), the cancer appeared hypoechoic on ultrasound. The median volume of these cancers was 4.19 cm3 (range 0.45-19.22); 80% exhibited extra-capsular extension (ECE); 30% had seminal vesicle invasion (SVI); and 95% were nondiploid by nuclear image analysis (CAS 200 system). In patients with isoechoic cancer, tumor volume was significantly less (median 0.38 cm3) and ECE and SVI occurred less frequently (13% and 0%, respectively). Only seven (30%) had nondiploid tumors. In 35 patients, the tumor was palpable, and the pathologic features and DNA ploidy values (94% nondiploid) of these cancers were similar to those of the tumors that were visible on ultrasound. In seven patients, the cancer was visible by ultrasound but not palpable by digital rectal examination. Median tumor volume was 1.72 cm3 (range 0.45-18.98); four patients (57%) had ECE; one (14%) had SVI, and six (86%) had nondiploid cancers. We conclude that most cancers that appear hypoechoic on ultrasound are clinically important and exhibit aggressive pathologic features. Palpable cancers and sonographically visible cancers are similar and should be staged and treated similarly.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.