Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “ORTHODONTICS”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 379 records · Page 21Linked to original sources
PubMed1995

Management of the orthodontic patient 'at risk' from infective endocarditis.

There are no clear guidelines for the application of current antibiotic prophylactic regimes to orthodontic patients at risk from infective endocarditis. In order to ascertain current practice, a survey on various aspects of the management of orthodontic patients at risk from infective endocarditis was undertaken. Questionnaires were sent to all 1038 members of the British Society for the Study of Orthodontics and the British Association of Orthodontists. A total of 518 replies were received, 480 (46%) of which were completed in full and analysed. Eight cases of infective endocarditis associated with orthodontic treatment over a 44-year period were reported. The majority of respondents underestimated the number of at risk patients likely to be encountered over a 5-year period. Most orthodontists routinely contact the medical practitioner (62%) or hospital consultant (65%) for advice on the prescription of prophylactic antibiotics. Only 58 (12%) claimed to have refused orthodontic treatment for at risk patients. The majority of respondents advise the use of antibiotic prophylaxis for band placement and removal and manipulation of an unerupted tooth. A high standard of oral hygiene must be established prior to orthodontic treatment for at risk patients. Antibiotic prophylaxis in orthodontics should be used for procedures which cause gingival trauma eg band placement and removal. The daily use of a chlorhexidine mouthwash during treatment and prior to appliance adjustment is recommended.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1997

A field trial of an orthodontic treatment need learning package for general dental practitioners.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate whether GDPs using an index of Orthodontic Treatment Need (IOTN) learning package in a practice setting referred (or treated) more patients with a definite need for orthodontic treatment. DESIGN: A randomised controlled trial. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: 20 GDPs (test group) used the package when selecting patients for orthodontic care during normal dental practice. A control group of 20 GDPs did not use the package. Over a 12-month period impressions were taken by the participating GDPs of all patients selected for orthodontic treatment, either referred to another practitioner or to be treated by the GDP. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: IOTN used by two expert examiners. RESULTS: Among the patients selected for orthodontic treatment by the test group there were more patients with a definite objective need for orthodontic treatment (78.1% versus 62.5% in the control group). After adjustment for potential confounding variables, the odds on a patient selected by a test group dentist being in definite need were 2.24 (95% CI 1.25, 4.01) more than the odds on a patient selected by a control group dentist (P = 0.007). CONCLUSIONS: Use of the IOTN learning package by GDPs would reduce the proportion of patients selected for orthodontic treatment with low or moderate objective need.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2005

Undergraduate orthodontic teaching in UK dental schools.

AIMS AND OBJECTIVES: This paper assesses the current teaching of undergraduate orthodontics in UK dental schools and the changes these courses have undergone in the last three years. METHOD: Questionnaires were e-mailed to the undergraduate orthodontic course leaders in each of the UK dental schools. Twelve dental schools agreed to participate in the survey. Responses were checked for completeness, summarised and sent back to individual course leaders to verify. These verified responses were then analysed. RESULTS: There was a wide variation in the orthodontic course form and content in the 12 UK dental schools. The greatest variation occurred in the clinical teaching hours (50 to 126), the types of patient treatment undertaken (removable only to full fixed), the laboratory teaching hours (0 to 60), the content of the laboratory course (removable appliances to fixed appliance typodonts), the in-course assessment (minimal to extensive, and 0% to 40% of BDS), and the format of the BDS examination. A number of dental schools reported reductions in their orthodontic courses in academic, clinical and laboratory hours and content, and in the number of undergraduate orthodontic teaching staff in the last three years. CONCLUSIONS: Comparison of undergraduate orthodontic courses revealed a wide variation in course hours and content, and in student assessment and examination. Considerable changes have occurred to the courses in the last three years. Half of the UK courses have been affected by The First Five Years General Dental Council document(1) and university pressures, with reductions in both course content and staffing in the last three years. For standards to be maintained, guidelines are needed to safeguard clinical content and student assessment in undergraduate orthodontic courses in UK dental schools.

Curriculum↗
PubMed2004

Orthodontic treatment need in Asian adult males.

Orthodontic treatment in adults has gained social and professional acceptance in recent years. An assessment of orthodontic treatment need helps to identify individuals who will benefit from treatment and safeguard their interest. The purpose of this study was to assess the objective and subjective levels of orthodontic treatment need in a sample of orthodontically untreated adult Asian males. A sample of male army recruits (n = 339, age 17-22 years, Chinese = 258, Malay = 60, Indian = 21) with no history of orthodontic treatment or craniofacial anomalies participated in the study on a voluntary basis with informed consent. Impressions for study models were taken. Objective treatment need was assessed based on study model analysis using the Index of Orthodontic Treatment Need (IOTN). Questionnaires were used to assess subjective treatment need based on subjective esthetic component (EC) ratings. Fifty percentage of the sample had a definite need for orthodontic treatment (dental health component [DHC] grades 4 and 5), whereas 29.2% had a moderate need for treatment (DHC grades 3). The occlusal trait most commonly identified was dental crossbite. Malay males had the highest percentage with a definite need for treatment for both dental health and esthetic reasons in comparison with Chinese and Indian males. However, there was no difference in the level of treatment need among the ethnic groups (P > .05). No correlation between objective and subjective EC scores was found (P > .05). A high level of investigator-identified treatment need was not supported by a similar level of subject awareness among the adult sample.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2006

Factors influencing applicant ranking of orthodontic programs.

Orthodontic programs spend considerable amounts of effort to attract, recruit, and interview the best and brightest applicants. Applicants and programs submit ranked preferences, and resident positions are filled by a computerized matching system (Match). The specific aims of this study were to determine the relative importance of certain factors in applicants' Match ranking of orthodontic programs and differences between orthodontic program directors' perceptions and actual factors cited by applicants influencing their ranking of orthodontic programs. Surveys were mailed to 55 orthodontic program directors and 478 applicants participating in the 2002 orthodontic Match. Forty-nine program director (89%) and 224 applicant (47%) surveys were returned. Rankings and importance of factors cited by applicants in their decision-making process and perceptions of those factors cited by program directors were compared. Applicants' top three factors were: "satisfied current residents," "multiple techniques taught," and "good quality of clinical facility." Program directors' perceived top three factors were: satisfied current residents, "good program reputation," and "good impression of current residents at interview." Comparing program directors' perceptions vs applicants' factors overall, the two groups were statistically different (P < .0001). Factors that stood out for their differences included: "GRE required or emphasized" (P < .0002), multiple techniques taught (P < .0007), and "good location" (P < .0008). Despite these differences, there was generally a high level of overall agreement between program directors' perceptions and factors actually influencing applicants' ranking of orthodontic programs.

Adult↗
PubMed2000

Interceptive orthodontics in the real world of community dentistry.

OBJECTIVE: To test the applicability and effectiveness of interceptive orthodontics in a community field trial. DESIGN: Prospective screening for suitable malocclusions, implementation of treatment and analysis of outcomes 12 months later. SETTING: Community dentistry in urban and rural areas of Northern Ireland, 1996-98. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: The initial sample consisted of 2002 children (1014 boys, 988 girls) who were screened in routine community dental inspections. One thousand and sixty (523 aged 9 years, 537 aged 11 years) were domiciled in the urban area of greater Belfast and 942 (479 aged 9 years, 463 aged 11 years) in the rural area of Enniskillen and Omagh, Co. Tyrone. INTERVENTIONS: Interceptive orthodontic treatment. OUTCOME MEASURES: Dental health component of the Index of Orthodontic Treatment Need (IOTN) and specially devised local indices of treatment outcomes. RESULTS: With the use of an interception gauge, orthodontic screening was included in the community dental inspections without difficulty. Thirty-three per cent of children were in need of interceptive treatment. Only 20% of those in need both attended for recall and underwent treatment. Compliance was better in the rural area but the need, with particular reference to extraction of carious first molars, was greater in the urban area. The numbers of children in IOTN grades 4 and 5 fell from 69% at the beginning of the study to 42% at the end. The outcome judged by local indices was 94% in the range of complete success to minimal improvement with only 2% showing deterioration. CONCLUSIONS: One in three children screened in community dental inspections at age 9 and 11 years would benefit from interceptive orthodontics. Parents and children seem reluctant to accept offers of interceptive orthodontics and to having the treatment carried out. Among those complying fully, the interceptive measures are very successful. Not only does community interceptive orthodontics improve the condition being treated but also reduces the need for further treatment.

Chi-Square Distribution↗
PubMed2002

Periodontic and orthodontic treatment in adults.

The purpose of this article is to provide an update of the interrelationship between periodontics and orthodontics in adults. Specific areas reviewed are the reaction of periodontal tissue to orthodontic forces, the influence of tooth movement on the periodontium, the effect of circumferential supracrestal fiberotomy in preventing orthodontic relapse, the effect of orthodontic treatment on the periodontium, microbiology associated with orthodontic bands, and mucogingival and esthetic considerations. In addition, the relationship between orthodontics and implants (eg, using dental implants for orthodontic anchorage) is discussed.

Adult↗
PubMed2004

A systematic review of Swedish research in orthodontics during the past decade.

The aims of this systematic review were to identify the study designs and topics of Swedish orthodontic articles, to elucidate their international position, and to verify in which scientific journals the articles had been published in the past decade. A search of the Medline database for papers published between 1992 and 2002 was made using the Medical Search Heading terms 'orthodontics', 'malocclusion', 'cephalometry', and 'facial bones and growth'. Two independent reviewers selected the articles of Swedish origin and categorized each article according to research design and principal topic. Overall, 15,571 articles in orthodontic research were found, and the Swedish contribution was 1.9% with the majority of these (71.5%) being submitted by universities. Most of the Swedish articles (84.5%) had been published in 10 journals and many high-quality studies with orthodontic interest were published in non-orthodontic journals with higher impact factor scores than the orthodontic journals. Every second study was prospective, and of these, 15 (5.2% of all Swedish articles) were randomized clinical trials (RCTs). It was found that nearly every third study, prospective as well as retrospective, was uncontrolled. The main classification was treatment studies (51.9%), followed by development (18.6%) and diagnostic information (10.7%) studies. Thus, the majority of the articles evaluated therapeutic interventions; however, although the RCT is the preferred study design in evaluation studies, few used this method. In an era focused on evidence-based medicine, studies with an RCT design will be the future challenge for research in the field of orthodontics.

Dental Research↗
PubMed1998

Perception of treatment need among orthodontic patients compared with professionals.

The aim was to evaluate estimated need for orthodontic treatment, as judged from intraoral photographs, among orthodontic patients and professionals. Twenty consecutive prospective orthodontic patients, 20 consecutive orthodontically treated patients, 10 randomized general dentists, and 10 orthodontists participated. Seventy pairs of anonymous intraoral photographs of dentitions with varying degrees of objective treatment need were randomly arranged in a notebook. The general dentists and orthodontists rated orthodontic treatment need on a visual analog scale in a similar way among themselves and were more reserved than both patient categories, who also scored similarly among themselves. Professional raters also had similar inter- and intra-rater reliability among themselves, and it was higher than in either of the patient categories. Treatment providers appear to be more restrictive, consistent, and reliable in their judgement of orthodontic treatment need from intraoral photographs than the target group, patients positive toward orthodontic treatment.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1996

The effect of orthodontic treatment on centric discrepancy.

The purpose of this study is to investigate the effects of orthodontic treatment on centric discrepancy. Thirty-six orthodontic patients who had been treated with an edgewise appliance were selected for this study while 30 persons who had no history of orthodontic treatment were used as a control group. After recording centric relation using a leaf gauge, centric prematurity, and centric slide were compared using a SAM2 articulator and mandibular position indicator. Results indicated that the number of subjects with one prematurity was significantly greater in the control group (86.7%); however, the number of subjects with two or more prematurities was greater in the orthodontic treatment group (41.6%). The orthodontic treatment group showed more bilateral prematurities. There were no differences between the two groups with regard to the teeth involved in centric prematurities. Just considering the anatomic portion of teeth, centric prematurities were significantly associated with the buccal incline of the maxillary palatal cusp. There were no significant differences in the amount or direction of centric slide between the orthodontic and control groups. This study indicates that orthodontic treatment does not generally result in an increase in centric discrepancy.

Adult↗
PubMed1994

Osseointegrated implants as orthodontic anchorage in the treatment of partially edentulous adult patients.

In nine partially edentulous adult patients, mean age 47 years (range 17-64 years) 23 osseointegrated implants were used as orthodontic anchorage to perform the following types of orthodontic tooth movements: tipping, torquing, rotation, intrusion, extrusion, and those associated with bodily movements. The total orthodontic treatment period varied between 4 and 33 months (x = 17 months). Pre-operatively, at the start and end of orthodontic treatment, and at the annual controls, clinical as well as biometric and radiographic (panoramic, lateral cephalograms and periapical radiographs) recordings were performed. The osseointegrated anchorage units were used as reference points for measurements of two- and three-dimensional tooth movements with a co-ordinate machine. The 2-D tooth movements varied between 0.2 and 6.2 mm, whereas movements in the third dimension, extrusion and intrusion, ranged from 0.0 to 13.5 mm. The movement in space for the individual tooth was observed to be, as a mean, 3.9 mm (range 0.6-18.7 mm). However, the osseointegrated titanium implants (fixtures) used as orthodontic anchorage remained in position when orthodontically loaded for the various tooth movements. After completion of the orthodontic treatment the fixtures served as abutments for permanent prosthetic constructions.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2004

The relationship between patient, parent and clinician perceived need and normative orthodontic treatment need.

The aim of the present study was to compare patient, parent and clinician perceived need for orthodontic treatment in relation to normative orthodontic treatment need as measured by the Index of Orthodontic Treatment Need (IOTN). A prospective cross-sectional study was designed to address this aim. The sample comprised 103 patients attending the 'new' patient clinic at the Jordan University Hospital. The patients' mean age was 15.3 years (standard deviation 3.8 years); 33 per cent were males and 67 per cent females. One clinician scored the patients' normative orthodontic treatment need using the IOTN, then determined perceived need using a 10 cm visual analogue scale (VAS). The subjects then assessed their own perceived need and aesthetic component (AC) score and the parents carried out similar assessments for their children. All scoring was carried out blind. The parents had the highest average perceived need scores, followed by patient and clinician scores (6.6, 6.1 and 5.4 cm, respectively). A significant difference was found between the parents and the clinician (P < 0.05). When the relationship between perceived need and clinician-measured normative orthodontic treatment need was investigated, significant differences were found with the dental health component (DHC) for all three groups (P < 0.05). Differences between AC and perceived need scores were also significant for the patients and parents, but not for the clinician (P > 0.05). The present study has shown that perceptions of orthodontic treatment need are multifactorial and influenced by elements other than health measures of normative orthodontic treatment need and perceptions of aesthetics.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2006

A socio-dental approach to assessing children's orthodontic needs.

Traditional methods of assessing orthodontic treatment need using mainly clinical measures are inadequate and would be improved by integrating normative, oral health-related quality of life (OHRQoL), and behavioural propensity measures. This study aimed to develop and test a socio-dental system of orthodontic needs assessment, and to compare normative and socio-dental estimates of orthodontic need. The socio-dental system integrates three types of need: normative need (NN), impact-related need (IRN) and propensity-related need (PRN). A cross-sectional survey of all 1,126 children aged 11-12 years in Suphanburi, Thailand, was carried out to test the new system. The dental health component of the Index of Orthodontic Treatment Need was used to assess NN, and the simplified oral hygiene index for oral hygiene status. Oral impacts were assessed using the child-Oral Impacts on Daily Performances (child-OIDP) index. A self-administered questionnaire recorded information on demographic and oral health-related behaviour. Treatment needs were assessed according to the developed socio-dental system. The socio-dental approach to assess orthodontic needs was easy to use and readily accepted by the children. The estimates of orthodontic need assessed normatively and socio-dentally differed markedly. The prevalence of NN and IRN was 35.0 and 10.5 percent, respectively, thus representing a reduction of approximately 70 percent in the volume of treatment need according to the new method. Children with IRN had different levels of propensity for orthodontic treatment, and therefore required appropriate treatment plans according to their PRN. Of the 10.5 percent with IRN, 6.9 percent had high or medium-high PRN, while 3.6 percent were at medium-low and low levels of propensity.

Child↗
PubMed2003

Temporomandibular disorders, occlusion and orthodontic treatment.

OBJECTIVES: To prospectively and longitudinally study symptoms and signs of temporomandibular disorders (TMD) and occlusal changes in girls with Class II malocclusion receiving orthodontic fixed appliance treatment in comparison with untreated Class II malocclusions and with normal occlusion subjects. DESIGN: Prospective observational cohort. SUBJECTS: Sixty-five girls with Class II malocclusion who received orthodontic treatment, 58 girls with no treatment, and 60 girls with normal occlusion. METHOD: The girls were examined for symptoms and signs of TMD and re-examined 2 years later. Additional records were taken in the orthodontic group during active treatment and 1 year after treatment RESULTS: All three groups included subjects with more or less pronounced TMD, which showed individual fluctuation during the ongoing study. In the orthodontic group, the prevalence of muscular signs of TMD was significantly less common post-treatment. Temporomandibular joint clicking increased in all three groups over the 2 years, but was less common in the normal group. The normal group also had a lower overall prevalence of TMD than the orthodontic and the Class II group at both registrations. Functional occlusal interferences decreased in the orthodontic group, but remained the same in the other groups over the 2 years. CONCLUSIONS: (i) Orthodontic treatment either with or without extractions did not increase the prevalence or worsen pre-treatment symptoms and signs of TMD. (ii) Individually, TMD fluctuated substantially over time with no predictable pattern. However, on a group basis, the type of occlusion may play a role as a contributing factor for the development of TMD. (iii) The large fluctuation of TMD over time leads us to suggest a conservative treatment approach when stomatognathic treatment in children and adolescents is considered.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2004

Initial biofilm formation of Streptococcus sobrinus on various orthodontics appliances.

Biofilms accumulate on hard and soft surface in the oral cavity. Accumulation of biofilms on orthodontic appliance bear scientific and clinical interest. The objection of this study was to examine the formation of dental biofilm by Streptococcus sobrinus on different types of orthodontics appliances, using a model consisting of host and bacterial constituents. The adsorption pattern of saliva to the orthodontics appliances was determined by means of gel electrophoresis coupled with computerized densitometry techniques. The amount of salivary proteins adsorbed onto the surfaces was measured using the Bradford method. Sucrose-dependent bacterial adhesion to the saliva-coated orthodontics appliances was tested by radioactive-labelled S. sobrinus. Our results show different adsorption patterns of salivary proteins to the various orthodontic appliances as modules, brackets, springs and intra oral elastics. Modules and brackets demonstrated the most affinity to salivary proteins. A surface dependent adhesion profile was recorded, showing a high affinity of albumin and amylase to modules. Bacterial accumulation was the highest on modules compared with springs which demonstrated the least bacterial adhesion. Our study demonstrates the specificity of biofilm formation on the different orthodontic appliances. Formation of a variety of dental biofilms has a significant impact on the progression of dental diseases associated with orthodontic treatment.

Adsorption↗
PubMed1982

Cross-sectional study of orthodontic treatment and missing of permanent teeth in two birth cohorts of Finnish students according to sex.

Undergraduate students (n = 451) at a Finnish university were studied. For analysis, the subjects were divided into two birth cohorts: those born before 1955, and those born in that year or later. Information about previous orthodontic appliance therapy was obtained from the students by using a structured questionnaire. Missing permanent teeth (second and third molars excluded) were recorded at a dental examination. Every 10th student had received orthodontic treatment; the proportion of orthodontically treated subjects was higher for females (14%) than for males (5%). Seven percent of students born in 1954 or earlier and 15% of the younger students had had orthodontic treatment before 1977. In 39% of subjects, at least one permanent tooth was missing while only 12% had lost more than two permanent teeth. The tooth missing most often was the permanent mandibular first molar (in 23% of subjects). Frequency of tooth loss was the same in males and females. At least one permanent tooth was missing in 48% of the older and in 31% of the younger students. At least one first molar had been lost by 36% of the older students and 20% of the younger ones. Fewer first molars but more permanent teeth anterior to the first molars were missing in subjects who had had orthodontic treatment than in subjects who had not had such treatment. Among Finnish students the frequency of extraction of permanent teeth because of caries is decreasing, and the frequency of orthodontic treatment is increasing. Females are more likely to seek orthodontic treatment than males are.

Adult↗
PubMed1999

An in situ caries model to study demineralisation during fixed orthodontics.

OBJECTIVES: To investigate de/remineralization of enamel during the early stages of orthodontic treatment using the in situ caries model. DESIGN: A prospective, longitudinal study, using the in situ caries model. SETTING AND SAMPLE POPULATION: The Department of Orthodontics at the University of Liverpool School of Dentistry. Fifteen orthodontic patients undergoing fixed appliance treatment with extraction of premolar teeth. EXPERIMENTAL VARIABLE: Two enamel samples with pre-formed caries-like lesions were placed bilaterally, in specially constructed holders, on an orthodontic fixed appliance. One sample was bonded with a small bracket base. OUTCOME MEASURE: The parameters of the pre-formed carious lesion, expressed as mineral loss (delta Z), lesion depth (ld), lesion width (lw) and ratio (delta Z/ld) were compared between the bracketed, the non-bracketed and a control sample that had not been placed in the mouth. The difference between brackets place on the dominant (toothbrush hand) side and non-dominant side were also investigated. The correlation between mineral loss and length of time the sample was in the mouth was also analysed. RESULTS: There was considerable individual variation; however, a one-factor repeated analysis of variance showed a significant difference in ratio values between the three groups (p = 0.006). A pairwise comparison showed a significant reduction in ratio value for the non-bracketed sample compared with the control, but not the bracketed sample. There was no significant difference in mineral loss between the dominant and non-dominant sides. There was no linear correlation between the length of time the sample was in the mouth. CONCLUSION: An enamel sample with a pre-formed carious lesion, when placed in the mouth of an orthodontic patient, showed reduced remineralization in the presence of a simulated orthodontic bracket. Consistently effective preventive regimes to prevent demineralization in patients with fixed orthodontic appliances need to be developed. The technique described will be a valuable tool in this process.

Analysis of Variance↗
PubMed2006

Patients' expectations of orthodontic treatment: part 1 - development of a questionnaire.

OBJECTIVE: The development of a questionnaire to measure patients' and their parents' expectations before orthodontic treatment, and to test the reliability and validity of this measure. DESIGN: A two-stage methodology, with open-ended interviews to identify themes and concepts followed by development and testing of the questionnaire. SETTING: GKT Orthodontic Department, King's College Dental Hospital. SUBJECTS: The sample consisted of 140 participants, 70 patients aged 12-14 years, who had been referred to the orthodontic department for treatment. One parent of each patient was also recruited. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study was in two phases. In the first phase 30 participants (15 new patients and their 15 parents) participated in open-ended interviews, which were analysed qualitatively. Information from these interviews was used to construct a questionnaire. During the second phase, the questionnaire was piloted on 10 participants, five new consecutive patients and their parents. The questionnaire was then distributed to 174 subjects (87 new patients and their 87 parents). Seventy-eight subjects (39 new patients and their 39 parents) completed the questionnaire before their orthodontic consultation. Another 96 subjects (48 new patients and their 48 parents) were invited to complete the questionnaire prior to and at their orthodontic consultation. Test-retest analysis was conducted on 22 participants (11 patients and their 11 parents), who completed the questionnaire previous to and at their orthodontic consultation, and contributed to the psychometric validation of this questionnaire. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: A questionnaire was devized using the key themes and concepts identified in the open-ended interviews. As a result, 10 questions, some with sub-questions were constructed using a visual analogue scale as the response format. RESULTS: The questionnaire developed had good face validity. Internal consistency of the questionnaire using Cronbach's alpha, produced an overall inter-item reliability > 0.7 along with item-total correlations > 0.3 in over 50% of questions. Test-retest reliability was statistically significant using Spearman's correlation. CONCLUSION: This study provides a valid and reliable measure of orthodontic expectations in participants aged 12-14 years and their parents.

Adolescent↗