Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “OBSTETRICS”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 379 records · Page 21Linked to original sources
PubMed2004

Educational needs of rural and remote Australian non-specialist medical practitioners for obstetric ultrasound.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the educational needs of rural and remote non-specialist Australian doctors for obstetric ultrasound. DESIGN: Survey design. SETTING: The study surveyed rural and remote doctors practising in a variety of settings including general practice, rural hospitals, Aboriginal communities and flying doctor organisations throughout Australia. SUBJECTS: Subjects included 314 solo and group practice rural general practitioners, rural hospital medical superintendents, senior medical officers, Aboriginal community controlled health service doctors, flying doctors, rural locums, registrars and two rural obstetricians. A total of 55% of the subjects were general practitioners in group practice. Respondents included 68 (22%) women and 246 (78%) men. RESULTS: The response rate was 32%. The highest priority areas of need for education included detecting foetal abnormalities and anomalies (19.1%), basic routine ultrasonography (17.17%), placental position (17.17%), dating (17.17%), foetal viability (12.88%) and morphology scan (12.26%). The main areas where doctors stated they lacked confidence included detecting foetal abnormalities (29.09%), basic routine ultrasonography (including machine use), such as, carrying out and interpreting obstetric ultrasound scans (27.27%), morphology scans (16.36%) and placental position (14.54%). CONCLUSION: The study showed there was a large unmet need for education in obstetric ultrasound among rural and remote non-specialist doctors. Information from the needs assessment was used to develop the Australian College of Rural and Remote Medicine national obstetric ultrasound professional development program. WHAT IS ALREADY KNOWN: The authors could not find any published work on the educational needs of Australian non-specialist rural and remote doctors for obstetric ultrasound. There is research about the outcome of obstetric ultrasound education for urban family physicians in the USA, but no information about rural doctors' educational needs or education outcomes. The study needed to be done so that obstetric ultrasound professional development program of the Australian College of Rural and Remote Medicine could be based on the real needs of the target group. WHAT THIS PAPER ADDS: As a result of this research, there is now information on the educational needs of rural and remote Australian non-specialist medical practitioners that can be used by education providers to develop quality education programs in obstetric ultrasound.

Adult↗
PubMed1996

A comparison of severity of illness scoring systems for critically ill obstetric patients.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the predictive ability of three scoring systems, acute physiology and chronic health evaluation (APACHE II), simplified acute physiology score (SAPS II), and mortality probability models (MPM II) in critically ill obstetric patients compared to a control group of non-obstetric female patients of similar age group (range, 17 to 41 years). DESIGN: A retrospective medical chart review of obstetric and nonobstetric female patients between 17 and 41 years of age. SETTING: Two university hospitals. PATIENTS: Ninety-three obstetric patients and 96 nonobstetric female patients were identified from 12,740 consecutive ICU admissions. RESULTS: The actual mortality of the obstetric and the nonobstetric group was 10.8% (95% confidence interval [CI], 5.3 to 19.0%) and 12.5% (95% CI, 6.6 to 21.0%), respectively. The observed mortality was not statistically different from the mortality predicted by APACHE II, SAPS II, and MPM II (14.7%, 7.8%, and 9.1% for the obstetric group and 10.9%, 9.0%, and 9.9% for the nonobstetric group). Predictive accuracy was assessed by the c-index, which is equivalent to the area under the receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curve. There were no significant differences in the c-index for APACHE II, SAPS II, and MPM II within or between the obstetric group ([mean +/- SE], 0.93 +/- 0.02, 0.90 +/- 0.04, and 0.91 +/- 0.04, respectively) and the nonobstetric group (0.97 +/- 0.02, 0.95 +/- 0.03, and 0.96 +/- 0.02, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that APACHE II, SAPS II, and MPM II assess the ICU outcome of critically ill obstetric patients as accurately as nonobstetric critically ill female patients of similar age group.

APACHE↗
PubMed1999

A study of maternal mortality at the University Teaching Hospital, Lusaka, Zambia: the emergence of tuberculosis as a major non-obstetric cause of maternal death.

SETTING: The Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University Teaching Hospital, Lusaka, Zambia. OBJECTIVES: To ascertain 1) the non-obstetric causes of maternal mortality, 2) the importance of tuberculosis as a cause of maternal deaths, and 3) the trends in the aetiology of non-obstetric causes of maternal deaths during the past decade in the light of the human immunodeficiency virus epidemic. DESIGN: A 2-year retrospective study of the aetiology of all maternal deaths occurring at the University Teaching Hospital (UTH), Lusaka, Zambia between 1 January 1996 and 31 December 1997. Comparison of these data with available data published between 1974 and 1989. RESULTS: There were 251 maternal deaths recorded during the study period. Of these, 106 (42%) were due to direct (obstetric) causes and 145 (58%) were due to indirect (non-obstetric) causes. Malaria (30%), tuberculosis (25%) and unspecified chronic respiratory tract infections (22%) accounted for 77% of non-obstetric causes of maternal deaths and 44% of all causes of maternal deaths. The diagnosis of AIDS was closely linked with that of tuberculosis (92% of cases), and unspecified chronic respiratory illnesses (97%), but not with malaria (37%). The maternal mortality ratio for UTH was calculated at 921 per 100,000 live births, a significant increase from the 118 noted in 1982 and 667 in 1989. CONCLUSIONS: Despite improved obstetric services, the maternal mortality ratios at UTH, Lusaka, have increased eight-fold over the past two decades. This dramatic increase is mainly due to non-obstetric causes of death. Malaria and AIDS-associated tuberculosis and unspecified 'chronic respiratory illnesses' are now major causes of maternal death in Zambia. Greater emphasis is urgently required on early detection, accurate diagnosis, treatment and prevention of malaria and tuberculosis in pregnancy. Further definition of chronic 'unspecified' respiratory illnesses is also required.

Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome↗
PubMed2000

Multiplying obstetrics: techniques of surveillance and forms of coordination.

The article argues against the common notion of disciplinary medical traditions, i.e. Obstetrics, as macro-structures that quite unilinearily structure the practices associated with the discipline. It shows that the various existences of Obstetrics, their relations with practices and vice versa, the entities these obstetrical practices render present and related, and the ways they are connected to experiences, are more complex than the unilinear model suggests. What allows participants to go from one topos to another--from Obstetrics to practice, from practice to politics, from politics to experience--is not self-evidently induced by Obstetrics, but needs to be studied as a surprising range of passages that connect (or don't). Techniques and devices to supervise the delivery, to render present the fetus during pregnancy, and to monitoring birth, are described in order to show that such techniques acquire different roles in connecting and creating Obstetrics as a system and obstetrical practices.

Delivery, Obstetric↗
PubMed2000

Correlating obstetric epidural anaesthesia performance and psychomotor aptitude.

We investigated the correlation between the scores attained on computerised psychometric tests, measuring psychomotor and information processing aptitudes, and learning obstetric epidural anaesthesia. Ten anaesthetic trainees performed an adaptive tracking task (ADTRACK 3) and one information management task (MAZE) from the MICROPAT testing system. They then embarked on a standardised obstetric anaesthesia training programme prior to performing obstetric on-call duties. The success or failure of their first 50 obstetric epidurals was recorded. There was a significant correlation between mean obstetric epidural failure rate for the second 25 consecutive epidurals and ADTRACK 3 (r = -0.579, p = 0.04) scores. The correlation between the means of the first 25 and 50 consecutive epidurals and ADTRACK 3 scores was not significant. There was no significant correlation between epidural failure rate and MAZE scores. The ratios of the mean epidural failure rate for the last 25 epidurals to the mean for the first 25 epidurals were not significantly correlated with ADTRACK 3 or MAZE scores. Psychomotor abilities appear to be poor determinants of trainees' initial proficiency at obstetric epidural anaesthesia or of trainees' rates of progress during early obstetric epidural training, but may be determinants of an individual's performance after the initial training phase.

Adult↗
PubMed1991

GP trainees' views on hospital obstetric vocational training.

OBJECTIVES: To examine the content of hospital obstetric vocational training for general practice, the beliefs of general practitioner trainees about this training, and their perceived competence at practical obstetric procedures and the effect of training. DESIGN: Confidential postal questionnaire. SUBJECTS: A random one in four sample of all general practitioner trainees in the United Kingdom on vocational training schemes or in training practices in Autumn 1990. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Trainees' competence and beliefs on Likert scale, numbers of procedures witnessed and performed, type of maternity care trainees intended to provide. RESULTS: Of 1019 trainees sent questionnaires, 765 (75.1%) replied; 517 had done some hospital obstetric training. After six months as a senior house officer 232/367 (63%) believed they were competent to perform a normal delivery unaided, 228 (62%) to manage a severe postpartum haemorrhage, and 227 (62%) to resuscitate a newborn infant. 272 (35.6%) trainees intended to provide intrapartum care and 56 (7.5%) to book home deliveries in the future. Hospital training increased confidence in performing most obstetric procedures in all trainees. However, a greater proportion of trainees who intended to provide full care than shared care felt competent at performing a normal vaginal delivery (63% (170/272) full v 45% (215/473) shared), low forceps delivery (38% (103) v 17% (79)), manual removal of placenta (24% (65) v 17% (82)), and intubating a neonate (42% (114) v 34% (161)). Trainees who had done any obstetric training were less likely to think that training encouraged future provision of intrapartum care (113/509 (22%) training v 65/213 (31%) no training). CONCLUSION: Hospital vocational obstetric training increases the perceived competence of trainees but fails to encourage them to use obstetric skills.

Attitude of Health Personnel↗
PubMed1999

A survey of Australasian obstetric anaesthesia audit.

In order to develop a minimal obstetric anaesthesia dataset based on current Australasian clinical audit best practice, we carried out a postal survey of 69 Australasian anaesthetic departments covering an obstetric service. We asked about data being collected, specifically concerning the high risk obstetric patient, epidural analgesia and postoperative anaesthetic review. Examples of any data collection forms were requested. Of the 66 responses, 35 departments (53%) were not collecting any audit data. Twenty-six of the 31 departments (84%) performing obstetric anaesthesia audit responded to our follow-up telephone survey. Eighteen departments believed that there had been an improvement in patient care as a result of their audit and 13 felt that the benefits outweighed the costs involved. However, only six departments (9%) had performed an audit cycle. The importance of feedback to patients or hospital staff and the incidence of post dural puncture headache (PDPH) were cited by some as priorities for obstetric anaesthesia audit. There was however no consistency as to what data should be collected. Many responses suggested a perceived need to collect clinical data without knowing what to do with it. Our survey has highlighted confusion between three distinct objectives; a dataset for obstetric anaesthesia record keeping, data required for continuing patient management in hospital and, a specific minimal dataset for clinical audit purposes. We conclude that current Australasian obstetric anaesthesia audit strategies are inadequate to develop a minimal dataset for cost-effective clinical audit.

Analgesia, Epidural↗
PubMed1986

Obstetric anesthesia: a national survey.

To assess obstetric anesthesia in the United States, and to determine why more anesthesia personnel are not involved in this subspecialty, a questionnaire was sent to the heads of obstetric and anesthesia services in 1,200 hospitals. Both obstetric and anesthesia respondents agreed on several characteristics of obstetric anesthesia that inhibit more participation by anesthesia personnel. Among others, they identified that: the unpredictability of labor and delivery makes scheduling difficult; obstetricians tend to dictate type and timing of anesthesia; the risk of malpractice claims is increased for obstetric anesthesia; and, finally, larger obstetric services would make it more practical to provide anesthesia services. Regarding availability of personnel and procedures, obstetric units with less than 500 deliveries per year were considerably more under-staffed than the larger units in most areas studied. When general anesthesia was used for cesarean section in these units, it was provided by, or given under the direction of, an anesthesiologist only 44% of the time, whereas in the hospitals with more than 1,500 deliveries per year, an anesthesiologist was present 86% of the time. Likewise, in the small units, personnel classified as "others" were responsible for newborn resuscitation in 24% and 43% of instances after cesarean section and vaginal delivery, respectively. In the hospitals with more than 1,500 deliveries, comparable figures were 4% and 2%, respectively.

Anesthesia, Epidural↗
PubMed1995

Chiropractic care, including craniosacral therapy, during pregnancy: a static-group comparison of obstetric interventions during labor and delivery.

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether the addition of chiropractic care including craniosacral therapy to a regimen of standard obstetric pregnancy results in fewer obstetric interventions during labor and delivery. DESIGN: Retrospective, case-matched, static-group comparison. SETTING: The study group was obtained from a college faculty-based clinic and received chiropractic care in addition to their routine obstetrical care. The setting for the comparison group was unkown, but the care rendered was presumed to be primary medical obstetric care only. PATIENTS: A consecutive sample of 63 pregnant women who sought chiropractic care within the period under study. The reason for seeking care was not necessarily related to the pregnancy. The sample was primarily between 18 and 35 yr, non-Hispanic caucasian and primiparous. After selection and matching criteria, 35 patients remained in the study group. INTERVENTION: Chiropractic care and craniosacral therapy delivered during pregnancy vs. unknown care within the same county. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Obstetric interventions during labor and delivery as reported by the birth attendant on the certificate of live birth. RESULTS: No statistical differences were detected in the rates of obstetric interventions used during labor or delivery between the two samples. Approximate large-sample 95% confidence intervals are provided. CONCLUSION: Because of the limitations in the design of the project, this study provides no evidence that the addition of chiropractic care and craniosacral therapy during pregnancy results in any observable benefit or detriment with regard to obstetric interventions used during labor and delivery and that chiropractic care for pregnancy-related neuromusculoskeletal disorders should not complicate labor or delivery.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1998

[The introduction of obstetric forceps in Norway--a 250-year anniversary].

Johan Gottfried Erichsen (1713-68), born in Germany and chief medical officer in Bergen from 1747, was probably the first to perform a forceps delivery in Norway, on 14 February 1748. The mother, who had been in labour for five days, survived; the child, however, did not. The obstetric forceps had been a secret in the Chamberlen family and had become more widely known only a few decades earlier. Erichsen, who was the first man-midwife in Norway, had learned obstetrics in Paris by the younger Grégoire. He mastered both the techniques of internal version and forceps delivery. This article describes Erichsen's medical and obstetric background and his qualifications for operative obstetrics. He worked in the period when the obstetric forceps changed obstetrics, birth delivery became an arena also for men, and a part of medicine. Obstetrics was established as a science and physicians had a tool whereby also children could be saved during complicated delivery.

Female↗
PubMed2002

Obstetric attending physician characteristics and their impact on vacuum and forceps delivery rates: University of California at San Francisco experience from 1977 to 1999.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of our study was to determine the impact of obstetric attending physician characteristics (eg, region of previous residency training, sex, year of graduation from residency) on the rates of vacuum and forceps delivery at our institution. STUDY DESIGN: The analysis was based on 19,897 vaginal deliveries that were performed by 171 attending physicians and 160 resident physicians between 1977 and 1999 at the University of California at San Francisco Medical Center. Z -tests and multivariate logistic regression were performed on a perinatal database that contained standard obstetric variables. RESULTS: Male attending physicians had a higher percentage of forceps deliveries compared with female attending physicians (11.1% vs 6.6%; P <.001); female attending physicians had a higher percentage of vacuum deliveries compared with male attending physicians (9.8% vs 5.1%; P <.001). However, multivariate regression analysis revealed that only the year in which the procedure was performed affected both the forceps and vacuum delivery rates (P <.041). The region of previous residency training of the attending physician affected the vacuum delivery rate (P <.0001) but not the forceps delivery rate (P >.06) in multivariate logistic regression analysis. Factors such as the sex of the obstetric attending physician, the sex of the resident, and the year of graduation from residency for the obstetric attending physician did not have a significant impact on the forceps or vacuum delivery rates (all P >.05). CONCLUSION: Our study is the first to report that the apparent gender differences in forceps and vacuum delivery rates among obstetric attending physicians was due to the year in which the procedure was performed and not due to sex per se. We also found that the region of previous residency training for the obstetric attending physician significantly influenced the vacuum delivery rate.

Delivery, Obstetric↗
PubMed1981

The maximin strategy in modern obstetrics.

Many currently accepted obstetrical practices exemplify a maximin strategy: making the best of the worst possible outcome, regardless of the actual probability of that outcome occurring. But a survey of recent obstetrical research fails to document superior clinical results when this strategy is employed in routine obstetrical care. Most research has studied obstetrical technologies in isolation rather than as parts of systems of interconnected interventions: this approach has tended to underestimate the risks of intervention and to overestimate the utility of a maximin strategy. Physicians practicing obstetrics should adopt a flexible approach and match the degree and type of intervention to actual patient needs. Better methods of assessing preventable prenatal risk are needed to allow identification of the rare-obstetrical patient requiring maximal intervention.

Anesthesia, Obstetrical↗
PubMed1983

Use of National Board test questions to evaluate student performance in obstetrics and gynecology.

The evaluation of student performance in clinical obstetrics and gynecology is frequently based on results of the National Board Examination, Part II. An Obstetrics and Gynecology subtest of this examination was studied to determine its value as a measure of this clinical experience. The clinical usefulness of each question and the distribution of questions among subjects within the specialty (Normal Obstetrics, Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility, etc.) were determined independently by faculty in obstetrics and gynecology. In addition, the influence of the type of question (e.g., multiple-choice, matching), the category of material, and the clinical usefulness of each question were studied in regard to student test performance. Eighty-six percent of the questions were judged to be indispensable, highly useful, or moderately useful. Abnormal Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility accounted for 70% of the questions with the remaining questions distributed among Normal Obstetrics, Population and Family Planning, and Gynecologic Oncology. Student test performance was not significantly influenced by the type of question format or category of material but was related to the level of clinical usefulness. Overall, these results, which are based on ratings from five faculty and a single class of medical students at one medical school, indicate that the Obstetrics and Gynecology subtest of the National Board Examination, Part II, is a reasonable measure of clinical experience in this field.

Certification↗
PubMed1993

Effects of rotation discipline on medical student grades in obstetrics and gynecology throughout the academic year.

OBJECTIVES: Our purpose was to determine whether the sequence of rotation disciplines taken can effect medical student examination scores on the National Board of Medical Examiners Subject Exam score for obstetrics and gynecology. STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective study was conducted of 439 student files for the academic years 1987 through 1991. The final clerkship grades and subject examination scores for internal medicine, pediatrics, psychiatry, surgery, and obstetrics and gynecology were reviewed. RESULTS: It was determined that completion of internal medicine or surgery before obstetrics and gynecology yielded higher scores in obstetrics and gynecology (p < 0.00001), with the largest improvement (from 533 to 586) observed when obstetrics and gynecology followed the internal medicine rotation. CONCLUSION: The sequence of rotation can affect scores on the National Board of Medical Examiners subject examination in obstetrics and gynecology. The largest improvement in student scores was observed when obstetrics and gynecology followed the internal medicine or surgery clerkships.

Curriculum↗
PubMed1995

An objective definition of shoulder dystocia: prolonged head-to-body delivery intervals and/or the use of ancillary obstetric maneuvers.

OBJECTIVE: To generate an objective definition of shoulder dystocia by timing the events of the second and third stages of labor, and to define the true incidence of shoulder dystocia. METHODS: In 34 arbitrarily selected 24-hour time periods, a nonparticipating observer prospectively timed intervals of the second stage of labor in all vaginal deliveries and recorded the use of obstetric maneuvers (McRoberts, episiotomy after delivery of the fetal head, intentional extension of initial episiotomy after delivery of the fetal head, suprapubic pressure, posterior arm rotation to an oblique angle, rotation of the infant by 180 degrees, delivery of the posterior arm, and general anesthesia) and whether the obstetric attendant identified a delivery with shoulder dystocia. All data are reported as mean +/- standard error of the mean. RESULTS: Two hundred fifty deliveries were timed and recorded prospectively. Mean intervals (in seconds) in nonmaneuver patients were as follows: head to anterior shoulder 14.8 +/- 1.0, anterior to posterior shoulder 3.9 +/- 0.6, posterior shoulder to body 5.4 +/- 0.8, and total head-to-body time 24.2 +/- 1.3. Three groups of patients were defined after delivery. The maneuver group consisted of 27 patients requiring any of the aforementioned obstetric maneuvers, although the obstetric attendant identified only 16 of these as shoulder dystocia. The prolonged delivery group included 29 patients with the head-to-body delivery interval exceeding the mean plus two standard deviations (60 seconds) of nonmaneuver patients. Sixteen of the 27 maneuver patients were identified as prolonged. The 210 not identified as maneuver or prolonged were considered to be normal. Normal patients had a significantly lower newborn birth weight (3269 +/- 38 g), and a lower proportion of 1-minute Apgar scores of 7 or less (11%) than did the maneuver (4247 +/- 86 g, 41%) and prolonged groups (3952 +/- 118 g, 34%). Defining shoulder dystocia as a prolonged head-to-body delivery time and/or the use of obstetric maneuvers identified 40 patients who had birth weights and 1-minute Apgar scores significantly different from the normal patients. CONCLUSION: The incidence of shoulder dystocia, as defined by the use of ancillary obstetric maneuvers, is higher than that reported previously, and the reporting of shoulder dystocia appears to be unreliable. The interval from head-to-body delivery is delayed significantly in patients with shoulder dystocia, despite the lack of recognition of shoulder dystocia. We propose defining shoulder dystocia as a prolonged head-to-body delivery time (eg, more than 60 seconds) or the need for ancillary obstetric maneuvers.

Adult↗
PubMed2006

"Good obstetrics" revisited: too many evidence-based practices and devices are not used.

INTRODUCTION: As countries are designing and implementing strategies to address maternal and newborn mortality and morbidity (Millennium Development Goals 5 and 4), it appears that a large number of evidence-based obstetric practices are not used in many settings, and this is a major obstacle to the improvement of quality obstetric care. OBJECTIVES: To remind readers of the existing, relatively easy-to-implement, evidence-based interventions that are currently not being universally applied in obstetric care and, second, to foster research to expand the evidence base further for obstetric care practices and devices, especially those that could be used in resource-poor settings. METHODS: We review possible reasons why changes into practices are difficult to obtain, and we list the key evidence-based interventions known to effectively deal with the main obstetric complications, with supporting references and sources of documentation. We also list some promising interventions that require more research before being recommended. CONCLUSION: Professionals and health services managers have a crucial role in producing the best quality obstetric and neonatal care through implementing the listed evidence-based interventions and make them accessible to all pregnant women and their newborns without delay, even in poor settings. Reasons for which progress is slow should be addressed. One of these reasons being the lack of access to scientific knowledge from the part of professionals in developing countries, we give the key references and also websites which are freely accessible through the Internet. It is hoped that this paper will stimulate the discussion on the dissemination and use of good obstetric practices, and contribute to better maternal and newborn health.

Evidence-Based Medicine↗
PubMed1997

The quality of citations in major international obstetrics and gynecology journals.

OBJECTIVE: Our goal was to determine the error rate in references in articles published in three major international journals in obstetrics and gynecology. STUDY DESIGN: All issues (excluding supplements) for the year 1995 of the American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, the Australian and New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, and the British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology were examined. References were numbered sequentially, and 50 randomly selected references from each journal were checked against the original for accuracy. RESULTS: Errors were found in the majority of references. The lowest error rate was 55.6% from the Australian and New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, and the highest was 66.7% from the British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology. The difference between journals was not statistically significant. The most frequent types of error were in the title of the article or in the authors' names. CONCLUSIONS: Error rates in major international journals in obstetrics and gynecology are high, and care must be taken by authors and journal staff to improve the quality of published articles.

Gynecology↗
PubMed2003

Obstetric admissions to the intensive care unit: outcomes and severity of illness.

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether mortality prediction based on a current model of outcome prediction is accurate in obstetric patients. METHODS: Consecutive obstetric admissions to a medical intensive care unit from 1991 to 1998 were reviewed to determine whether mortality prediction is feasible in obstetric patients based on a widely used model. The Simplified Acute Physiologic Score (SAPS II) was used to predict the probability of hospital mortality. RESULTS: The Simplified Acute Physiologic Score overestimated mortality in all patients (19 predicted deaths, eight observed) but accurately predicted mortality in patients admitted to the intensive care unit for medical reasons (seven predicted, five observed). The Simplified Acute Physiologic Score did not predict mortality in patients admitted for obstetric indications or postpartum hemorrhage. Median SAPS II scores were significantly higher in those patients who died, compared with survivors. For all groups, SAPS II scores were correlated with intensive care unit length of stay but not hospital length of stay. CONCLUSION: The Simplified Acute Physiologic Score accurately predicts hospital mortality in obstetric patients admitted to the intensive care unit for medical reasons but not for indications related to pregnancy and delivery. An alternate model that predicts outcomes in obstetric patients admitted for obstetric indications should be developed.

Adult↗