Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Notch”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 379 records · Page 21Linked to original sources

Notch signaling induces cell cycle arrest in small cell lung cancer cells.

Among the various forms of human lung cancer, small cell lung cancer (SCLC) exhibits a characteristic neuroendocrine (NE) phenotype. Neural and NE differentiation in SCLC depend, in part, on the action of the basic-helix-loop-helix (bHLH) transcription factor human achaete-scute homologue-1 (hASH1). In nervous system development, the Notch signaling pathway is a critical negative regulator of bHLH factors, including hASH1, controlling cell fate commitment and differentiation. To characterize Notch pathway function in SCLC, we explored the consequences of constitutively active Notch signaling in cultured SCLC cells. Recombinant adenoviruses were used to overexpress active forms of Notch1, Notch2, or the Notch effector protein human hairy enhancer of split-1 (HES1) in DMS53 and NCI-H209 SCLC cells. Notch proteins, but not HES1 or control adenoviruses, caused a profound growth arrest, associated with a G1 cell cycle block. We found up-regulation of p21(waf1/cip1) and p27kip1 in concert with the cell cycle changes. Active Notch proteins also led to dramatic reduction in hASH1 expression, as well as marked activation of phosphorylated extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK)1 and ERK2, findings that have been shown to be associated with cell cycle arrest in SCLC cells. These data suggest that the previously described function of Notch proteins as proto-oncogenes is highly context-dependent. Notch activation, in the setting of a highly proliferative hASH1-dependent NE neoplasm, can be associated with growth arrest and apparent reduction in neoplastic potential.

Basic Helix-Loop-Helix Proteins↗

A human homologue of the Drosophila developmental gene, Notch, is expressed in CD34+ hematopoietic precursors.

Members of the Notch gene family have been shown to mediate cell-fate decisions by multipotent precursors in a number of different systems. To determine whether members of this family might play a similar role in hematopoiesis, we asked if homologues of the Notch gene are expressed in human hematopoietic precursors. Using degenerate oligonucleotides corresponding to conserved amino acid sequences in known Notch homologues as primers for the polymerase chain reaction (PCR), we demonstrated that at least one Notch homologue is expressed in human bone marrow CD34+ cells, a population enriched for hematopoietic precursors. Cloning and sequencing of the PCR products identified this Notch homologue as TAN-1, a member of the Notch family previously cloned from a T-cell leukemia with a translocation involving this gene. Subsequent evaluation of bone marrow hematopoietic cells for TAN-1 expression using a reverse transcription-PCR assay confirmed the expression of TAN-1 in CD34+ hematopoietic precursors, including the immature subset that lacks expression of lineage-associated antigens (CD34+lin-). These findings, together with the known role of Notch homologues in other systems, suggest that members of the Notch family, including TAN-1, may be involved in mediating cell-fate decisions during hematopoiesis.

Animals↗

Notch pathway defines an aggressive and immune-suppressive phenotype associated with checkpoint inhibitor resistance in pan-gastrointestinal adenocarcinomas.

The Notch pathway regulates the homeostasis and tumorigenesis of gastrointestinal epithelium. Given its roles in cancer stem cell capacity and cancer immunity, we hypothesized that Notch activation can predict poor prognosis and resistance to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in gastrointestinal adenocarcinoma (GIAC). The mRNA expression and genomic alterations of Notch pathway were characterized in esophagus (ESAD), stomach (STAD), colon (COAD), or rectum (READ) adenocarcinomas from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) dataset. The prognostic model (mRNA-score) was constructed using the TCGA dataset (the training set) and was validated in 3 independent sets (GSE19417 [ESAD], GSE84437 [STAD], and GSE40967 [COAD]). The associations of the mRNA-score with drug sensitivity, immune cell infiltration, and immunotherapy efficacy were, respectively, analyzed using the Genomics of Drug Sensitivity in Cancer (GDSC) database, the TCGA dataset, and multiple clinical cohorts including GSE165252, PRJEB25780, IMvigor210, and CheckMate-009/010/025. Notch pathway genes exhibited conserved genomic/transcriptomic features across four GIAC subtypes. Three pan-GIAC clusters were determined by unsupervised clustering, and the cluster with higher expression of the Notch pathway genes had shorter overall survival (OS), immunosuppressive microenvironment, and higher scores of the signatures concerning angiogenesis, cell cycle, PI3K-AKT-mTOR, TGF-&#x3b2;, glycolysis, etc. A prognostic algorithm (mRNA-score) was constructed, which was correlated with poor OS in the training set (TCGA, P&#x2009;<&#x2009;0.001) and three validation sets (GSE19417, P&#x2009;=&#x2009;0.025; GSE84437, P&#x2009;=&#x2009;0.001, GSE40967, P&#x2009;=&#x2009;0.007). A high mRNA-score was linked with more "resting"/ "anti-inflammatory" rather than "activated"/ "pro-inflammatory" tumor-infiltrating immune cells and ICI resistance in GIACs (GSE165252, P&#x2009;=&#x2009;0.047; PRJEB25780, P&#x2009;=&#x2009;0.047) and other solid tumors such as urothelial carcinoma and clear cell renal cell carcinoma. Our findings demonstrate the utility of the Notch pathway in predicting prognosis and ICI resistance. Further studies are warranted to explore the efficacy of Notch inhibitors as immunotherapeutic adjuvants to overcome ICI resistance.

Humans↗

Notch receptor encodes two structurally separable functions in Drosophila: a genetic analysis.

The Notch gene of Drosophila encodes a single transmembrane receptor that plays a central role in the process of lateral inhibition. This process results in the selection of individual mesodermal and neural precursors during the development of the muscular and nervous systems. The activation of Notch during lateral inhibition is mediated by the transmembrane ligand Delta (Dl) and effected by the transcription factor Suppressor of Hairless (Su(H)). The same functional cassette plays a role in other processes, in particular, the development and patterning of the wing. Genetic analysis has suggested that, in addition to the Su(H)-dependent pathway, Notch can signal in an Su(H)-independent manner. This process seems to be tightly associated with signalling by Wingless, a member of the Wnt family of signalling molecules. Here, we have analyzed further the possibility that the Notch protein encodes two different functions. To do so, we have studied the activities and genetic properties of different Notch receptors bearing deletions of specific regions of the intracellular and the extracellular domains in different developmental processes, and have sought to correlate the activity of these mutant proteins with those of existing mutants in Notch. Our results support the existence of at least two different activities of Notch each of which can be associated with specific structural domains.

Animals↗

Biomaterial-based notch signaling for the differentiation of hematopoietic stem cells into T cells.

Thymocyte development takes place in a complex milieu of supportive cells and ECM that are responsible for the proliferation, adhesion, migration, and selection processes these cells undergo before reaching maturity. In recent years, the role of notch signaling in lymphocyte development, specifically T-cell development, has been extensively characterized. Although notch ligand mediated signals have been shown to be a necessary component of T-cell generation from stem cells, high-throughput, synthetic biomaterial-based systems for notch-directed stem-cell differentiation into lymphocytes are yet to be reported. Here, we present a microbead-based, artificial notch signaling system to study stem-cell differentiation into the T-cell lineage. Magnetic microbeads were functionalized with the notch ligand DLL4 using streptavidin-biotin binding and antibody-antigen coupling. Immunohistochemistry and flow cytometry analysis indicated approximately 65% conjugation efficiency. Efficient notch signaling through these functionalized microbeads was demonstrated through a myotube inhibition assay in C2C12 myoblasts. Thy1.2(+) early T cells were successfully generated from mouse bone marrow hematopoietic stem cells (BMHSCs) using DLL4 functionalized beads using both insert-based and mixed stromal cell (OP9) coculture conditions, indicating that stem cell-stromal cell physical contact is not necessary for DLL4 directed T-cell differentiation. Coculture studies with bead-to-cell ratios of 1:1 generated higher T-cell differentiation efficiencies, compared to bead-to-cell ratios of 5:1. These data demonstrate the promising potential of this biomaterial-based notch signaling system to generate T cells from stem cells and to elucidate the molecular interactions in T-cell development.

Animals↗

Differential regulation of Notch signal transduction in leukaemia and lymphoma cells in culture.

The transduction of Notch signal plays an intricate role in cell differentiation and pathogenesis of haematological malignancies as well as in certain congenital conditions. We found no genomic changes in either gene in 34 leukaemic samples and 25 leukaemia and lymphoma cell lines. The functionality of Notch signalling was tested using HES1 gene activation. We show that Notch signalling is differentially regulated in T-acute lymphoblastic leukaemia (ALL) and B-lymphoma cells. The Notch pathway is intact in a majority of B-lymphoma cell lines, but EBNA2, which mimics notch function, can occasionally activate the pathway. In contrast, the Notch pathway is constitutively active in T-ALL. This is the first demonstration of a distinction between B-lymphomas and T-cell leukaemias in the functioning of the Notch-signalling pathway. This might be related to their pathogenesis.

Cell Line, Tumor↗

A chick homologue of Serrate and its relationship with Notch and Delta homologues during central neurogenesis.

In the Drosophila nervous system, lateral inhibition regulates commitment to a neural fate by preventing neighbouring cells from developing alike. This signalling process is mediated by two transmembrane proteins-Notch as receptor and Delta as its ligand. The Delta-related protein Serrate also acts as a Notch ligand in Drosophila, but in a different developmental process that organizes patterning of the wing. We have previously shown that lateral inhibition operates at early stages of neurogenesis in vertebrates, via genes homologous to Drosophila Delta and Notch. We report here the cloning of a chick Serrate homologue, C-Serrate-1. This gene is expressed in the central nervous system, as well as in the cranial placodes, nephric epithelium, vascular system, and distal limb-bud mesenchyme. In most of these sites, its expression is associated with expression of C-Notch-1 and C- Delta-1. All three genes are expressed in the ventricular zone of the hindbrain and spinal cord, throughout the period when neurons are being born. Within this zone, C-Delta-1 and C-Serrate-1 are expressed in complementary subsets of nondividing cells that appear to be nascent neurons: C- Serrate-1 expression is restricted to specific locations along the dorsoventral axis, forming narrow bands extending from the anterior hindbrain to the tail. Our observations strongly suggest that Delta-Notch signalling delivers lateral inhibition not only early but throughout vertebrate neurogenesis to regulate neuronal commitment, and that Serrate-Notch signalling may act similarly in this process. By analogy with its role in Drosophila wing patterning, C-Serrate-1 may also have a role in organising the dorso-ventral pattern of the neural tube. We argue that signalling via Notch maintains neurogenesis, both in vertebrates and in flies, by keeping a proportion of the neuroepithelial cells in an uncommitted stem-cell-like state.

Amino Acid Sequence↗

Requirement for dynamin during Notch signaling in Drosophila neurogenesis.

Singling out of a unique neural precursor from a group of equivalent cells, during Drosophila neurogenesis, involves Notch-mediated lateral signaling. During this process, activation of the Notch signaling pathway leads to repression of neural development. Disruption of this signaling pathway results in the development of an excess of neural cells. The loss of activity of dynamin, which is encoded by the gene shibire and is required for endocytosis, results in a similar phenotype. Here we have investigated the requirement of shibire function for Notch signaling during the segregation of sensory bristles on the notum of the fly. Overexpression of different constitutively active forms of Notch in shibire mutant flies indicates that shibire function is not necessary for transduction of the signal downstream of Notch, even when the receptor is integrated in the plasma membrane. However, when wild-type Notch is activated by its ligand Delta, dynamin is required in both signaling and receiving cells for normal singling out of precursors. This suggests an active role of the signaling cell for ligand-mediated receptor endocytosis in the case of transmembrane ligands. We discuss the possible implications of these results for normal functioning of Notch-mediated lateral signaling.

Animals↗

A widespread and early requirement for a novel Notch function during Drosophila embryogenesis.

The Notch pathway plays a key role in the formation of many tissues and cell types in Metazoans. We recently showed that Notch acts in two pathways to determine muscle precursor fates. The first is the "standard" Notch pathway, in which Delta activates the Notch receptor, which then translocates into the nucleus in conjunction with Su(H) to reprogram transcription patterns and bring about changes in cell fates. The second pathway is poorly defined, but known to be independent of the ligands and downstream effectors of the standard pathway. The standard pathway is required in many different developmental contexts and we wondered if there was also a general requirement for the novel pathway. Here we show that the novel Notch pathway is required for the development of each of five examined cell types. These results indicate that the novel pathway is a widespread and fundamental component of Notch function. We further show that both Notch pathways operate in the differentiation of the same cell types. In such cases, the novel pathway acts first and appears to set up or limit the size of equivalence groups. The standard pathway then acts within the equivalence groups to limit individual cell fates.

Animals↗

The abruptex mutations of notch disrupt the establishment of proneural clusters in Drosophila.

The receptor encoded by the Notch gene plays a central role in preventing cells from making decisions about their fates until appropriate signals are present. This function of Notch requires the product of the Suppressor of Hairless gene. Loss of either Notch or Suppressor of Hairless function results in cells making premature and incorrect cell fate decisions, whilst increases in Notch signalling prevent cells from making these decisions. Here we find that the proneural clusters are not established correctly in certain Abruptex mutations of Notch and this failure to establish proneural clusters correctly is not due to increased Notch signalling during lateral inhibition. In addition we show that the overexpression of certain dominant negative Notch molecules can disrupt the initiation of proneural cluster development in a manner similar to the Abruptex mutants.

Animals↗

Spatially restricted factors cooperate with notch in the regulation of Enhancer of split genes.

Expression of the Drosophila Enhancer of split [E(spl)] genes, and their homologues in other species, is dependent on Notch activation. The seven E(spl) genes are clustered in a single complex and their functions overlap significantly; however, the individual genes have distinct patterns of expression. To investigate how this regulation is achieved and to find out whether there is shared or cross regulation between E(spl) genes, we have analysed the enhancer activity of sequences from the adjacent E(spl)mbeta, E(spl)mgamma and E(spl)mdelta genes and made comparisons to E(spl)m8. We find that although regulatory elements can be shared, most aspects of the expression of each individual gene are recapitulated by small (400-500 bp) evolutionarily conserved enhancers. Activated Notch or a Suppressor of Hairless-VP16 fusion are only sufficient to elicit transcription from the E(spl) enhancers in a subset of locations, indicating a requirement for other factors. In tissue culture cells, proneural proteins synergise with Suppressor of Hairless and Notch to promote expression from E(spl)mgamma and E(spl)m8, but this synergy is only observed in vivo with E(spl)m8. We conclude that additional factors besides the proneural proteins limit the response of E(spl)mgamma in vivo. In contrast to the other genes, E(spl)mbeta exhibits little response to proneural proteins and its high level of activity in the wing imaginal disc suggests that wing-specific factors cooperate with Notch to activate the E(spl)mbeta enhancer. These results demonstrate that Notch activity must be integrated with other transcriptional regulators and, since the activation of target genes is critical in determining the developmental consequences of Notch activity, provide a framework for understanding Notch function in different developmental contexts.

Animals↗

Notch regulates cell fate in the developing pronephros.

The mechanisms that regulate cell fate within the pronephros are poorly understood but are important for the subsequent development of the urogenital system and show many similarities to nephrogenesis in the definitive kidney. Dynamic expression of Notch-1, Serrate-1, and Delta-1 in the developing Xenopus pronephros suggests a role for this pathway in cell fate segregation. Misactivation of Notch signaling using conditionally active forms of either Notch-1 or RBP-J/Su(H) proteins prevented normal duct formation and the proper expression of genetic markers of duct cell differentiation. Inhibition of endogenous Notch signaling elicited the opposite effect. Taken together with the mRNA expression patterns, these data suggest that endogenous Notch signaling functions to inhibit duct differentiation in the dorsoanterior region of the anlage where cells are normally fated to form tubules. In addition, elevated Notch signaling in the pronephric anlage both perturbed the characteristic pattern of the differentiated tubule network and increased the expression of early markers of pronephric precursor cells, Pax-2 and Wilms' tumor suppressor gene (Wt-1). We propose that Notch signaling plays a previously unrecognized role in the early selection of duct and tubule cell fates as well as functioning subsequently to control tubule cell patterning and development.

Animals↗

Characterization and developmental expression of the amphioxus homolog of Notch (AmphiNotch): evolutionary conservation of multiple expression domains in amphioxus and vertebrates.

Notch encodes a transmembrane protein that functions in intercellular signaling. Although there is one Notch gene in Drosophila, vertebrates have three or more with overlapping patterns of embryonic expression. We cloned the entire 7575-bp coding region of an amphioxus Notch gene (AmphiNotch), encoding 2524 amino acids, and obtained the exon/intron organization from a genomic cosmid clone. Southern blot and PCR data indicate that AmphiNotch is the only Notch gene in amphioxus. AmphiNotch, like Drosophila Notch and vertebrate Notch1 and Notch2, has 36 EGF repeats, 3 Notch/lin-12 repeats, a transmembrane region, and 6 ankyrin repeats. Phylogenetic analysis places it at the base of all the vertebrate genes, suggesting it is similar to the ancestral gene from which the vertebrate Notch family genes evolved. AmphiNotch is expressed in all three embryonic germ layers in spatiotemporal patterns strikingly similar to those of all the vertebrate homologs combined. In the developing nerve cord, AmphiNotch is first expressed in the posteriormost part of the neural plate, then it becomes more broadly expressed and later is localized dorsally in the anteriormost part of the nerve cord corresponding to the diencephalon. In late embryos and larvae, AmphiNotch is also expressed in parts of the pharyngeal endoderm, in the anterior gut diverticulum, and, like AmphiPax2/5/8, in the rudiment of Hatschek's kidney. A comparison with Notch1 and Pax5 and Pax8 expression in the embryonic mouse kidney helps support homology of the amphioxus and vertebrate kidneys. AmphiNotch is also an early marker for presumptive mesoderm, transcripts first being detectable at the gastrula stage in a ring of mesendoderm just inside the blastopore and subsequently in the posterior mesoderm, notochord, and somites. As in sea urchins and vertebrates, these domains of AmphiNotch expression overlap with those of several Wnt genes and brachyury. These relationships suggest that amphioxus shares with other deuterostomes a common mechanism for patterning along the anterior/posterior axis involving a posterior signaling center in which the Notch and Wnt pathways and brachyury interact.

Amino Acid Sequence↗

Cell-fate choice and boundary formation by combined action of Notch and engrailed in the Drosophila hindgut.

The Drosophila large intestine is initially subdivided into dorsal and ventral domains with distinct cell types, and a one-cell-wide strand of boundary cells is induced between them. Here we show that cell identity and localization of the boundary cells are determined by the combined action of Delta, Notch, and engrailed genes. The prospective dorsal domain of the hindgut primordium expresses engrailed. Engrailed represses Delta, which is ubiquitously expressed throughout the prospective hindgut region in early blastodermal stages, in the dorsal domain, and thus generates a Delta-positive/negative prepattern. Expression of Engrailed protein determines the dorsal domain, while an Engrailed-negative (Delta-positive) region is differentiated into the ventral domain. Delta-positive ventral cells activate a Notch cascade in abutting dorsal cells, and thus induce their differentiation into boundary cells. Mis-expression of a constitutively active Notch intracellular domain causes the entire large intestine to develop as boundary cells. It was also found that the transducing activity of a transmembrane form of activated Notch, which requires further proteolytic processing to generate intracellular fragments, is suppressed in the Delta-positive domain. Delta acts in two distinct ways: it activates the Notch signaling pathway in adjacent Delta-negative cells, and, at the same time, autonomously blocks Notch signaling in Delta-positive cells by affecting Notch processing.

Animals↗

Role of Notch pathway in terminal follicle cell differentiation during Drosophila oogenesis.

During Drosophila oogenesis the body axes are determined by signaling between the oocyte and the somatic follicle cells that surround the egg chamber. A key event in the establishment of oocyte anterior-posterior polarity is the differential patterning of the follicle cell epithelium along the anterior-posterior axis. Both the Notch and epithelial growth factor (EGF) receptor pathways are required for this patterning. To understand how these pathways act in the process we have analyzed markers for anterior and posterior follicle cells accompanying constitutive activation of the EGF receptor, loss of Notch function, and ectopic expression of Delta. We find that a constitutively active EGF receptor can induce posterior fate in anterior but not in lateral follicle cells, showing that the EGF receptor pathway can act only on predetermined terminal cells. Furthermore, Notch function is required at both termini for appropriate expression of anterior and posterior markers, while loss of both the EGF receptor and Notch pathways mimic the Notch loss-of-function phenotype. Ectopic expression of the Notch ligand, Delta, disturbs EGF receptor dependent posterior follicle cell differentiation and anterior-posterior polarity of the oocyte. Our data are consistent with a model in which the Notch pathway is required for early follicle cell differentiation at both termini, but is then repressed at the posterior for proper determination of the posterior follicle cells by the EGF receptor pathway.

Animals↗

Genetic regions that interact with loss- and gain-of-function phenotypes of deltex implicate novel genes in Drosophila Notch signaling.

The Notch signaling pathway is an evolutionarily conserved mechanism that regulates many cell fate decisions. The deltex (dx) gene encodes an E3-ubiquitin ligase that binds to the intracellular domain of the Notch protein and regulates Notch signaling in a positive manner. However, it is still not clear how Dx does this. We generated a transgenic line, GMR-dx, which overexpresses dx in the developing Drosophila eye disc. The GMR-dx line showed a rough-eye phenotype, specific transformation of a photoreceptor cell (R3 to R4), and a rotation defect in the ommatidia. This phenotype was suppressed in combination with a dx loss-of-function mutant, indicating that it was due to a dx gain-of-function. We previously reported that overexpression of Dx results in the stabilization of Notch in late endosomes. Here, we found that three motifs in Dx, a region that binds to Notch, a proline-rich motif and a RING-H2 finger, were required for this stabilization, although the relative activity of these variants in this assay did not always correspond to the severity of the rough-eye phenotype. In an attempt to identify novel genes of the Notch pathway, we tested a large collection of chromosomal deficiencies for the ability to modify the eye phenotypes of the GMR-dx line. Twelve genomic segments that enhanced the rough-eye phenotype of GMR-dx were identified. To evaluate the specificity of these interactions, we then determined whether the deletions also interacted with the wing phenotypes associated with a loss-of-function mutation of dx, dx24. Analyses based on whole-genome information allowed us to conclude that we have identified two novel loci that probably include uncharacterized genes involved in Dx-mediated Notch signaling.

Amino Acid Motifs↗

Notch and HES5 are regulated during human cartilage differentiation.

The molecular mechanisms of cartilage differentiation are poorly understood. In a variety of tissues other than cartilage, members of the basic helix-loop-helix (bHLH) family of transcription factors have been demonstrated to play critical roles in differentiation. We have characterized the human bHLH gene HES5 and investigated its role during chondrogenesis. Blockage of the Notch signaling pathway with a gamma-secretase inhibitor has demonstrated that the human HES5 gene is a downstream marker of Notch signaling in articular chondrocytes. Markers for the Notch signaling pathway significantly decrease during cartilage differentiation in vitro. Cell proliferation assayed by using BrdU has revealed that blockage of Notch signaling is associated with significantly decreased proliferation. Northern blot and reverse transcription/polymerase chain reaction of a panel of various tissues have shown that HES5 is transcribed as a 5.4-kb mRNA that is ubiquitously expressed in diverse fetal and adult tissues. Articular cartilage from HES5(-/-) and wild-type mice has been analyzed by using various histological stains. No differences have been detected between the wild-type and HES5(-/-) mice. Our data thus indicate that the human HES5 gene is coupled to the Notch receptor family, that expression of Notch markers (including HES5) decreases during cartilage differentiation, and that the blockage of Notch signaling is associated with significantly decreased cell proliferation.

Adolescent↗

Suppression of differentiation and proliferation of early chondrogenic cells by Notch.

Notch is a transmembrane protein involved in cell fate determination. In the present study, we observed temporally and spatially restricted expression of Notch1 in developing cartilage. Notch1 was localized starting from the mesenchymal condensation stage of embryonic mouse forelimbs. Interestingly, although localization could not be detected in the proliferating chondrocytes, obvious immunoreactivity indicating its expression was retained in the perichondrial region. Next, we investigated the expression of Notch1 and related molecules in a chondrogenic cell line, ATDC5 cells. Notch1, Delta-like (Dll)1, Deltex2, and Deltex3 were coexpressed after 6-day insulin treatment. Expression of Hairy and Enhancer of split homologue (HES)-1 followed thereafter. These results suggest that Notch may have a role in the early stage of chondrogenesis. To assess the effect of Notch activation, we cultured ATDC5 cells with a myeloma clone constitutively expressing Dll1, a ligand of Notch. We also used an adenovirus vector to express the constitutively active Notch1 intracellular domain (NIC). Activating either the endogenous or exogenous Notch receptor dramatically inhibited chondrogenic cell differentiation of ATDC5 cells, as assessed by Alcian blue staining of the cells and chondrocyte differentiation markers. Last, we investigated the effect of NIC on the proliferation of the ATDC5 cells. Expression of NIC by the adenovirus strongly suppressed thymidine incorporation. These results indicate that Notch is expressed in the initial stage of chondrogenic cell differentiation and has a strong inhibitory effect on both differentiation and proliferation of the cells when activated. The expression of Notch decreases as chondrogenic differentiation proceeds; however, a population of the cells with sustained expression of Notch1 become perichondrial cells. Considering that the perichondrium acts as a stem cell source of osteoblasts and chondrocytes, Notch1 may have a role in the formation of these cells by suppressing both differentiation and proliferation.

Adenoviridae↗