Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Insurance, Surgical”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 379 records · Page 21Linked to original sources

[Guidelines in surgery: from the viewpoint of health care economics].

Guidelines support the economic evaluation of surgical procedures. Therefore, guidelines should contain cost-benefit information as a basic element. Guidelines prompt activities in the health-care system by means of information. Some of the information should thus be available and understandable for nonmedical staff, too. Guidelines should improve the transparency of surgical outcome to enable patients and insured parties to make a more rational choice and thus provide their own input into the health care system.

Cost-Benefit Analysis↗

[Bariatric surgery -- stereotypes and paradigms].

Many physicians regard obesity as a sin and treat fat patients with disdain befitting a moral leper. Non-bariatric physicians, being a product of our culture, seem more likely to have an obesity paradigm close to that of the public. Many members of the public regard obesity surgery as dangerous. Many insurers reject morbid obese patients from bariatric surgical treatment with the paradigmal statement that obesity is totally the fault of a fat person. These medical experts do not accept obesity as a disease (which WHO does) and therefore social courts also reject applications of patients who want to undergo bariatric surgery. Morbid obesity is a multifactorial problem with genetic, biochemical, hormonal, environmental, behavioral and cultural elements. It is recognized as an extreme health hazard which is rarely the result of an aberrant moral problem or true addictive behavior. We need to change effectively the negative paradigms towards obesity and its surgery from some of our colleagues, hospital administration, medical insurers and the public. The existing prejudices are not acceptable.

Attitude of Health Personnel↗

[Laparoscopic surgery for gynecologic malignancy].

The gynecologic laparoscopic surgery that has developed in the reproductive field is performed for most cases of benign disease. Introduction of laparoscopic surgery for a gynecologic malignancy is relatively late in comparison with other surgical regions and does not qualify for insurance. An operation for a gynecologic malignancy is classified roughly into a surgery of internal pelvic organs and lymph nodes. The techniques which extensive technology is pursued involve radical hysterectomy and paraaortic lymph node excision. In the surgeons who performed many laparoscopic surgeries, it seems that a surgical procedure other than these can be performed at present. The experienced laparoscopic techniques and the particular knowledge of pelvic anatomy were necessary to perform laparoscopic surgery for gynecologic malignancy.

Female↗

Outpatient surgical utilization in Veterans Affairs hospitals, 1981-1989.

In the 1980s, there was a large increase in the percentage of surgical operations performed in the United States without an overnight hospital admission. This shift may have been related to changes in reimbursement for outpatient surgery; studies of this relationship have had conflicting results. The Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) has a budgeting strategy significantly different from reimbursement strategies used by nonfederal hospitals. The VA strategy underwent changes in terms of budgeting for outpatient surgery in the 1980s. Data from the American Hospital Association (AHA) Annual Survey of Hospitals collected during the years 1981 through 1989 inclusive were analyzed in an effort to examine VA outpatient surgical utilization and to compare changes in VA outpatient surgical utilization with changes in outpatient surgical utilization in the nonfederal sector. The VA had an apparent rapid expansion of outpatient surgical utilization in the mid-1980s compared with the nonfederal sector. This increase occurred without a concomitant decrease in inpatient surgical procedures. This apparent rapid expansion may represent a combination of real changes in surgical utilization, changes in utilization of services not traditionally thought to be surgical but counted as such by VA hospitals, and changes in VA record-keeping. All of the components of this expansion may have been accelerated by the implementation of the VA Resource Allocation Methodology in 1985 and 1986.

Ambulatory Surgical Procedures↗

Cardiac surgery in a fixed-reimbursement environment.

Hospital and physician services in Canada are funded by public (government) sources. This article will describe the practice of cardiac surgery in this setting. Federal legislation has prescribed the principles of accessibility, universality, comprehensiveness, portability, and public administration for essential healthcare services in Canada. Provincial and territorial governments are responsible for the provision of services, receiving federal tax and cash transfers that supplement provincial/territorial funds for hospital, physician, and community health services. Hospitals negotiate annually for global budgets. Physicians work as independent contractors in hospitals (and communities) and are usually paid as specified by fee-for-service contracts negotiated at intervals with governments. Cardiac surgical services have been planned conjointly with government. Forty-two centers in Canada serve a population of 28 million. All but three of these centers are located in tertiary teaching hospitals; all but one do more than 200 pumps annually. The rate of cardiac operations is 80 per 100,000 population. In Ontario, the Provincial Adult Cardiac Care Network makes recommendations to governments about the distribution of the 7,600 pumps annually (population, 11 million), rationalizing waiting lists based on an urgency rating scale. Patients requiring emergent/urgent operations are well served. The average waiting time for an elective cardiac operation is 10.5 weeks. The waiting list mortality is less than 0.5%. The Provincial Adult Cardiac Care Network also determines the placement of new programs and participates in creating hospital funding formulas developed from a combination of resource and acuity intensity weighting. Most surgeons hold full-time academic appointments but are funded largely by practice income. Surgical fees average $2,000 (Canada) per case. Overhead, including malpractice insurance, is approximately 45%. All Canadian patients enjoy reasonably timely access to good cardiac surgical care. Further constraints on physician compensation and (academic) hospital funding will compromise this balance.

Adult↗

Variation in specialist fees: evidence from New Zealand insurance claims.

OBJECTIVES: To examine the parity between specialties in reimbursements for surgical procedures in a private, fee-for-service setting and to ascertain whether differences exist after accounting for factors suggested by a Resource-Based Relative Value Scale (RBRVS). METHODS: A routinely updated database covering several private insurers (n = 8294 procedures from 1997 to 2002) was used to examine differences in overall and hourly reimbursement. Multiple regression analysis was used to control for factors that might be responsible for differences in payment (location, year, sex of patient and the associated anaesthetist fee). The resulting regression residuals were compared between specialties. RESULTS: Large differences between specialties in reimbursements were found in the overall amount paid. For most specialties, these differences were explained by factors such as time for procedure, location, complexity of procedure and sex of patients. However, hourly reimbursements for ophthalmologists were substantially higher (more than 50% above general surgery overall and 72% higher on an hourly basis). Some other smaller differences in overall and hourly reimbursement were also found. CONCLUSIONS: These results indicate that specialist fees vary significantly but many of the differences are explainable by factors incorporated into the RBRVS. However, significant variation remains for some specialties, most notably ophthalmology. Explanations for the results are discussed, including the possibility that political factors may influence the setting of specialist fees. This raises questions concerning the fairness of reimbursements and resulting solidarity within the medical profession.

Fee-for-Service Plans↗

[Is appendectomy really performed too frequently? Results of the prospective multicenter study of the Swiss Society of General Surgery].

Scientific publications and provoking criticism from the lay press have recently pointed out, that appendices may be surgically removed too frequent and without indisputable necessity. In an attempt to verify these questionable statements, the Swiss Society for General Surgery (SGAC) initiated a prospective controlled multi center trial. From September 1997 to December 1998, hundred and twenty-five institutions documented 4603 appendectomies performed due to a suspected appendicitis. Histological investigation of all specimens revealed a 7% rate of normal appendices, 7.2% for patients with national health service (NHS) and 5.9% for patients with private insurances respectively. Compared to the results of the literature, where a frequency of normal appendices around 15% is judged as standard, these results are excellent. In 17.2% of the patients (15.9% NHS and 23.6% privately insured patients) an "appendicitis perforata" was observed. This percentage remains in the range reported by other authors. The analysis of time of admission (i.e. day or night) and the delay from admission to surgery shows a distribution independent to the insurance of the patients. Therefore, the planned appendectomy for patients with private insurances does not exist. A different choice of the surgical technique could be observed depending on the insurance status. In 30.4% of the private insured patients a laparoscopic appendectomy was performed as compared to 22.6% of patients with NHS. Surprisingly, an identical median hospitalization time can be observed for both groups (laparoscopic 5.5 days, open surgery 5.5 days).

Adolescent↗

Digital video capture and synchronous consultation in open surgery.

OBJECTIVE: To achieve real-time or simultaneous surgical consultation and education to students in distant locations, we report the successful integration of robotics, video-teleconferencing, and intranet transmission using currently available hardware and Internet capabilities. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: Accurate visualization of the surgical field with high-resolution video imaging cameras such as the closed-coupled device (CCD) of the laparoscope can serve to insure clear visual observation of surgery and share the surgical procedure with trainees and, or consultants in a distant location. Prior work has successfully applied optics and technical advances to achieve precise visualization in laparoscopy. METHODS: Twenty-five thyroidectomy explorations in 15 patients were monitored and transmitted bidirectionally with audio and video data in real-time. Remotely located surgical trainees (n = 4) and medical students (n = 3) confirmed 7 different anatomic landmarks during each surgical procedure. The study used the Socrates System (Computer Motion, Inc. [CMI], Goleta, CA), an interactive telementoring system inclusive of a telestration whiteboard, in conjunction with the AESOP robotic arm and Hermes voice command system (CMI). A 10-mm flat laparoscopic telescope was used to capture the optical surgical field. As voice, telestrator, or marker confirmed each anatomic landmark the image parameters of resolution, chroma (light position and intensity), and luminance were assessed with survey responses. RESULTS: Confirmation of greater than 90% was achieved for the majority of relevant anatomic landmarks, which were viewed by the remote audience. CONCLUSION: The data presented in this study support the feasibility for mentoring and consultation to a remote audience with visual transmission of the surgical field, which is otherwise very difficult to share. Additionally, validation of technical protocols as teaching tools for robotic instrumentation and computer imaging of surgical fields was documented.

Education, Medical↗

Financial considerations insurance and coverage issues in intestinal transplantation.

OBJECTIVE: To increase healthcare workers' knowledge of reimbursement concerns. METHODS: Chronological survey of transplants reimbursed at the University of Nebraska Medical Center from December 1997 to October 2003, which include accounts of 30 patients who received intestine transplants. CONCLUSIONS: Gross billed hospital charges for the past 30 transplantations ranged from dollars 112094 to dollars 667597. Length of stay ranged from 18 to 119 days. Charges include organ procurement fees. All 30 intestine transplants were reimbursed by third-party healthcare coverage; combination of coverage; and/or patient and family payments, which resulted in adherence to financial guidelines prearranged by the hospital. Financial guidelines are usually cost plus a percentage. Thirteen transplantations occurred after April 2001, when Medicare made a national coverage decision to reimburse this form of transplantation. Since then, obtaining surgical authorization and reimbursement is easier. Most insurance companies and state public health agencies accept intestinal transplantations as a form of treatment. Researching transplant coverage before evaluation is essential to be compensated adequately. Financial guidelines will secure the fiscal success of the program. Educating patients to insurance and entitlements may reduce the out-of-pocket cost to patients. Transplant financial coordinators coordinate these efforts for the facility. The best coverage option for the patient and transplant programs is a combination of commercial healthcare coverage, secondary entitlement program, and fund-raising. With length of stay ranging up to 119 days and a lifetime of posttransplant outpatient follow-up care, it is beneficial for the facility to also have a fundraising program to assist patients.

Hospital Charges↗

Radical versus conservative surgery for vulvar carcinoma.

OBJECTIVE: The comparison of the radical and conservative surgical approaches for vulvar carcinoma in relation to the rate of recurrence and complications. METHODS: The records of invasive vulvar carcinoma cases were retrospectively reviewed in Istanbul University, Cerrahpasa School of Medicine, Gynecologic Oncology Division and Social Insurance Institution, Ankara Maternity Hospital, Gynecologic Oncology Department. Surgically treated cases with squamous histology were divided into radical vulvectomy and conservative procedures groups and were compared with respect to recurrence, complications, and disease-free survival. RESULTS: One hundred thirteen cases of invasive vulvar carcinoma cases were of squamous histopathology and 92 of these were surgically treated. The rate of local recurrence was lower in the radical vulvectomy group (25%) compared to conservative procedures groups (42.5%; p>0.05). The complication rates were comparable between the radical vulvectomy and conservative procedures groups (32.7% versus 35%, respectively; p>0.05). At the end of five years of the follow-up, the disease-free survival rates were 51.5% in radical vulvectomy group versus 35.7% in conservative procedures group (p>0.05). CONCLUSION: The rate of recurrence, complication, and disease-free survival are similar for the radical vulvectomy and the conservative procedures. Deciding the surgical strategy for vulvar carcinoma should depend on the experience of the surgeon for the short-term adequate results.

Adult↗

Video-assisted thoracoscopic excision of herniated thoracic disc: description of technique and preliminary experience in the first 29 cases.

This study evaluates the technique and results of video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) for the treatment of symptomatic thoracic disc herniation. Results were compared with a literature review of open surgical techniques of thoracic disc excision with regard to efficacy, safety, and surgical outcomes. VATS has recently been described for thoracic surgery as having the advantage of decreased postoperative pain and morbidity, faster patient recovery, and shortened intensive care unit (ICU) hospitalization. Twenty-nine consecutive patients underwent VATS for symptomatic thoracic disc herniation. Herniations ranging from T5-6 to T12-L1 were successfully approached by using a three- or four-portal strategy. Postoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans were evaluated. Pre- and postoperative Oswestry Disability Questionnaires and Linear Analog Pain Scale data were obtained. Patients were grouped according to presenting symptoms. The minimal follow-up was 1 year (range, 12-24 months). Mean operative time was 175 min for 29 patients. Significant improvement (p < 0.01, paired t test) was recorded in Oswestry Disability Questionnaires and Linear Analog Scale Tests. Of the patients, 75.8% (22) were satisfied, 3.4% (one) unsatisfied, with 20.1% (six) unchanged. Narcotic use was significantly eliminated or reduced. Mean return to work was 5 weeks (private insurance) and 21 weeks (workers compensation). The surgical and postoperative complication rate was 13.8%. VATS appears to be a safe and efficacious method of excising herniated thoracic discs. Follow-up results at 1 year resulted in high patient satisfaction. VATS advantages include decreased length of hospitalization as well as improved patient comfort.

Adult↗

Effect of high up front charges on access to surgery for poor patients at a public hospital in New Mexico.

BACKGROUND: A public hospital in New Mexico required collection of 50% of estimated costs prior to elective surgeries for self-pay patients. This study assesses the impact of this policy on access to elective surgical procedures. METHODS: Chi-square tests determined if there was a statistically significant difference between the number of self-pay and insured patient cancellations for financial reasons. A multivariate binomial regression model was used to calculate risk ratios and confidence limits for effects of race/ethnicity, and insurance status, controlling for gender, on these cancellations. RESULTS: Of the 667 cancellations, there were 99 self-pay and 568 insured patients. Cancellations for financial reasons occurred in 55.6% of self-pay and 9.3% of insured patients (p < 0.0001). Inability to pay 50% up front accounted for 76.4% of self-pay patient cancellations for financial reasons. Self-pay, non-Hispanic whites and minority race/ethnicities were 8.76 and 8.61 times more likely to cancel for financial reasons, respectively, than insured non-Hispanic whites. CONCLUSION: Self-pay patients, regardless of race/ethnicity, have elective surgical procedures cancelled for financial reasons significantly more often than insured patients. The hospital's 50% up-front payment policy represents a significant financial barrier to accessing elective surgical procedures for self-pay patients.

Journal Article↗

Differentiating among hospitals performing physiologically complex operative procedures in the elderly.

BACKGROUND: The authors previously showed how a statewide discharge abstract database could be used to quantify for stakeholders how surgical practices differ among hospitals. The two pediatric hospitals in Iowa differ from other hospitals in Iowa based on their providing a more diverse, comprehensive, and physiologically complex selection of procedures in younger patients. Physiologically complex surgery performed in children aged 0-2 yr has been regionalized to a few high-volume facilities. METHODS: The same inpatient discharge abstract database was used to quantify physiologically complex operative procedures performed throughout Iowa in patients aged 80 yr and older during January through June 2001. RESULTS: In contrast to earlier results with pediatric patients using the same database, hospitals performing physiologically complex procedures in the elderly could not readily be differentiated from one another based on the numbers and types of procedures performed (P < 0.001 when comparing geriatrics vs. pediatrics in terms of the distributions of numbers of procedures, the distributions of numbers of different types of procedures, or the distributions of numbers of rare procedures performed at different hospitals). Additional analyses showed that one hospital did perform relatively more rare procedures in geriatric patients and had a relatively larger percentage of patients who traveled beyond their local county to reach it. CONCLUSIONS: Results observed for geriatric patients provide further evidence of the validity of these methods and the usefulness of discharge abstract data for comparing surgical practices among facilities. A hospital can use discharge abstract data to assist governmental agencies, charitable organizations, philanthropists, insurers, etc., in appreciating the unique contributions of individual hospitals to surgical care.

Aged↗