Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Estramustine”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 379 records · Page 21Linked to original sources
PubMed2005

Single-nucleotide polymorphisms in the 17beta-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase genes might predict the risk of side-effects of estramustine phosphate sodium in prostate cancer patients.

BACKGROUND: Estramustine phosphate sodium (EMP) frequently causes side-effects such as gastrointestinal discomfort, nausea, and edema in extremities. We analyzed single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNP) in the 17beta-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase (HSD17B) genes, which are involved in the metabolism of EMP, to predict the risk of EMP side-effects in prostate cancer patients. METHODS: We performed genotyping of SNP in the HSD17B genes of 44 Japanese patients with newly diagnosed prostate cancer. The association of SNP and individual EMP side-effects was evaluated. RESULTS: Peripheral edema occurred more frequently in patients with C/C genotype of IMS-JST123219 than in those with C/G genotype (OR: 5.47, 95% CI: 1.27-23.64). Haplotype analysis showed that appetite loss was associated with the G allele of IMS-JST123219 and the T allele of IMS-JST123218 (OR: 9.13, 95% CI: 1.15-72.76). CONCLUSIONS: These preliminary data demonstrated that analyses of SNP in the HSD17B genes might predict the occurrence of side-effects from EMP.

17-Hydroxysteroid Dehydrogenases↗
PubMed2006

Dramatic decline in prostate-specific antigen by withdrawal of estramustine phosphate in hormone refractory prostate cancer.

Prostate-specific antigen (PSA) decline after discontinuation of estramustine phosphate (EMP) is extremely rare. We report a case with dramatic PSA decline after withdrawal of EMP. A patient with prostate cancer had been treated with luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone and EMP. After refractory, EMP was withdrawn. After withdrawal of EMP, PSA dramatically decreased from 214 ng/mL to 3.71 ng/mL (98.5% decline) and remained low for more than 17 months. In association with PSA decline, lumbago and metastatic lesions improved. We should be aware of this phenomenon and the discontinuation of EMP is recommended in patients with rising PSA after an initial response to EMP.

Aged, 80 and over↗
PubMed1977

The treatment of oestrogen-escaped carcinoma of the prostate with estramustine phosphate.

30 patients with oestrogen-escaped carcinoma of the prostate have been treated with estramustine phosphate (Estracyt). 27% showed a partial objective response and 33% had a subjective response. The terms used for defining a response are challenged and it is recommended that comparative controlled trials are necessary to judge the place of this drug in the management of advanced prostatic cancer.

Clinical Trials as Topic↗
PubMed1980

Estramustine phosphate in the treatment of advanced prostatic cancer.

Thirty patients with advanced carcinoma of the prostate were treated with estramustine phosphate. All patients were followed up for a minimum of 9 months. Of 15 not previously treated with oestrogens 9 responded objectively and 11 subjectively. Of 15 patients whose tumours had failed to respond to at least 2 oestrogens, 3 responded objectively and 5 subjectively. Adverse effects consisted of cardiovascular complications, gynaecomastia and impotence. Gastrointestinal side effects were minimal and no hepatic, renal or marrow toxicity was seen. The criteria of assessment of response are discussed.

Estramustine↗
PubMed2006

Hoosier Oncology Group randomized phase II study of docetaxel, vinorelbine, and estramustine in combination in hormone-refractory prostate cancer with pharmacogenetic survival analysis.

PURPOSE: To determine the safety and efficacy of two docetaxel doublets in hormone-refractory prostate cancer (HRPC) patients and to examine the prognostic role of polymorphisms in host genes important to docetaxel metabolism and transport. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Sixty-four chemotherapy-naive patients with HRPC were randomized to docetaxel and vinorelbine (D, 20 mg/m2 i.v. days 1 and 8; V, 25 mg/m2 i.v. days 1 and 8) or docetaxel and estramustine phosphate (D, 60-70 mg/m2 i.v. day 1; E, 280 mg oral thrice daily days 1-5) administered q21d. Primary end point was clinically significant toxicity. A pharmacogenetic analysis of host genes was done in patients who received at least one cycle of docetaxel therapy. RESULTS: Grade 3/4 toxicity occurred in 15.6% of DV patients and in 28.6% DE patients. Neither arm exceeded the threshold of clinically significant toxicity. In the DV arm, objective response rate was 33%, prostate-specific antigen response rate was 20%, and median survival was 16.2 months. In the DE arm, objective response rate was 67%, prostate-specific antigen response rate was 43%, and median survival was 19.7 months. Pharmacogenetic analyses showed a significant association between survival beyond 15 months and the ABCG2 421 C > A (Q141K) polymorphism compared with the wild-type (C/C) genotype (66% versus 27%; P = 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: DV and DE doublets are active with a tolerable toxicity profile in patients with HRPC; however, efficacy does not seem superior to standard single-agent docetaxel. The ABCG2 421 C > A (Q141K) polymorphism may be an important predictor of response and survival in HRPC patients treated with docetaxel-based chemotherapy.

Adult↗
PubMed2005

Prospective study of estramustine phosphate for hormone refractory prostate cancer patients following androgen deprivation therapy.

INTRODUCTION: Estramustine phosphate (EMP) in combination with other cytotoxic agents has been widely used in clinical trials as an anti-tumor agent for the treatment of hormone-refractory prostate cancer (HRPC). However, few prospective studies have considered the efficacy of EMP monotherapy for HRPC patients following androgen-deprivation therapy (ADT), given the availability of methods to measure prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels in the serum. We therefore initiated a prospective study to determine whether EMP is efficient for HRPC following ADT using changes in PSA levels as the major endpoint. METHODS: After a diagnosis of anti-androgen withdrawal syndrome had been excluded, 34 patients with HRPC who showed an elevated serum PSA level in 3 or more sequential tests following ADT were treated orally with 560 mg/day of EMP. The clinical stage and the median PSA value for inclusion in the study were D2 and 25.9 (range 6.5-540.8) ng/ml, respectively. Treatment was continued until evidence of disease progression reappeared or until severe adverse effects appeared. RESULTS: Of the 34 patients enrolled, 29 were evaluated, while the other 5 (15%) patients were discontinued due to severe gastrointestinal side effects. Seven of the 29 patients (24%) showed a decrease of 50% or greater in serum PSA levels from the initially elevated values, with the median duration of PSA response being 8.0 (range 2.2-18.8) months. Baseline PSA, hemoglobin, alkaline phosphatase, lactate dehydrogenase, performance status, and length of time of initial hormonal treatment did not correlate with the PSA response. With a median follow-up time of 20.0 (range 3.2-45.6) months, the cancer-specific survival rate at 2 years was 83% in the PSA responders and 44% in the non-responders. The PSA response was correlated with cancer-specific survival (p = 0.029). CONCLUSIONS: Following ADT one quarter of HRPC patients responded to EMP, with more than 50% of patients showing a decrease in PSA levels and an enhanced survival rate.

Adenocarcinoma↗
PubMed1994

Study of estramustine binding protein: its relationship to androgen dependency and histological differentiation in human prostatic carcinoma tissue.

For the purpose of elucidating the clinical significance of estramustine binding protein (EMBP), EMBP concentration in human prostatic carcinoma (PC) tissue was measured by radioimmunoassay (RIA) using an antibody raised against rat EMBP and was compared with dihydrotestosterone (DHT) level and histological differentiation in the same tissue. The mean concentrations of EMBP in 20 untreated and 6 hormonally refractory PC were 112.6 +/- 120.7 and 218.0 +/- 102.3 ng/g tissue, respectively. In the 20 untreated PC, the EMBP concentration was not significantly different between the high and low tissue DHT groups. On the other hand, the EMBP concentration was significantly higher in moderately and poorly differentiated PCs as compared with well-differentiated PC, whereas the DHT level was highest in well-differentiated and lowest in poorly differentiated PC. Furthermore, in the 6 hormonally refractory PC, the EMBP concentration was higher in spite of a lower tissue DHT level in comparison with untreated PC. These results suggest that the EMBP concentration does not reflect androgen status in PC tissue but might reflect the malignant potential of the tumor.

Aged↗
PubMed1990

Estramustine phosphate in secondary hormone-resistant carcinoma of the prostate.

In this retrospective study, 71 patients with secondary hormone-refractory prostatic carcinomas were treated with estramustine phosphate (EMP), at three different dosages (280, 560, 840 mg orally). All patients were completely followed up until cancer-induced death. In 12 cases of further progression polychemotherapy was administered. As this was not a randomized study, an analysis of statistical significance was not performed. The higher dosages of EMP caused an extended progression-free interval accompanied by an equally considerable alleviation of carcinoma-induced pain. The overall survival time was not influenced by subsequent polychemotherapy. An elevation of liver function parameters was observed in 5 patients. One of these patients died of toxic liver damage, possibly therapy-related, on the basis of a preexisting cirrhosis. Cardiovascular side effects were not observed. With regard to survival time, the positioning of polychemotherapy as a third-line treatment for prostatic cancer should be examined critically. Before administration of high-dose EMP, it is mandatory to control liver functions carefully.

Aged↗
PubMed1996

Estramustine-binding protein in carcinoma and benign hyperplasia of the human prostate.

For the purpose of elucidating whether the biological characteristics of estramustine-binding protein (EMBP) are different in benign prostatic hypertrophy (BPH) and prostatic carcinoma (PC) and also to determine the clinical value of EMBP in the tissue, the EMBP concentration in 19 patients with BPH and 26 with untreated PC was measured by means of radioimmunoassay (RIA) using an antibody raised against EMBP obtained from the rat ventral prostate and compared simultaneously with the dihydrotestosterone (DHT) level in the same tissue. The level of serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) was also measured in these patients. The EMBP concentration was significantly correlated with the tissue DHT level in BPH and well-differentiated PC (r = 0.745, p < 0.0001), whereas it did not correlate in moderately and poorly differentiated PC (r = -0.159, p = 0.542). By comparing well-differentiated PC with moderately and poorly differentiated PC, the EMBP concentration was significantly lower in the former than in the latter two conditions (p < 0.005) in spite of the highest tissue DHT level in well-differentiated PC. The ratio of the EMBP concentration to the DHT level in moderately and poorly differentiated PC was significantly higher when compared with that observed in either BPH or well-differentiated PC (p < 0.005, respectively). However, the level of serum PSA did not reflect the histological differentiation of PC. These results suggest that: (i) the correlation of the EMBP concentration to the DHT level changed with the progression of the histological grade, and (ii) the ratio of the EMBP concentration to the DHT level in the tissue is clinically valuable in elucidating the biological potential of individual tumors.

Aged↗
PubMed1995

Estramustine phosphate for preventing flare-up in luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone analogue depot therapy.

The usefulness of estramustine phosphate (ECT) for preventing flare-up in goserelin acetate depot therapy for advanced prostate cancer was studied. Pretreatment with ECT 560 mg daily for 3 weeks almost completely prevented the rise in testosterone level seen in goserelin acetate depot therapy and no signs or symptoms of tumor flare were observed. Long-term ECT completely blocked the rise in luteinizing hormone and testosterone level, but ECT at this dosage was likely to cause complications. The administration of ECT 560 mg daily for 3 weeks prior to goserelin acetate depot therapy was considered sufficient to prevent tumor flare, and its effect was considered to be more marked than that of short-term treatment with antiandrogens.

Acid Phosphatase↗
PubMed1992

Phase II study of estramustine and vinblastine, two microtubule inhibitors, in hormone-refractory prostate cancer.

PURPOSE: Estramustine phosphate (EMP) and vinblastine are two microtubule inhibitors with distinct molecular targets and at least additive antimicrotubule effects in vitro. Their modest single-agent activities in hormone-refractory prostate cancer, nonoverlapping toxicities, and lack of cross-resistance prompted a phase II trial in hormone-refractory prostate cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Thirty-six assessable patients at the Fox Chase Cancer Center and seven Fox Chase Cancer Center Network institutions were treated with oral EMP 600 mg/m2 on days 1 to 42 and vinblastine 4 mg/m2 intravenously (IV) once a week for 6 weeks. Courses were repeated every 8 weeks. Response assessment was based on a change in serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels and was correlated with change in pain scores. RESULTS: PSA decreased from baseline by at least 50% in 22 patients (61.1%) and by > or = 75% in eight patients (22.2%). A 50% or more decrease in PSA on three successive 2-week measurements together with an improved or stable pain score, performance status, and measurable soft tissue disease (if present) was required for a partial response (PR), which occurred in 11 patients for an overall response rate of 30.5% (95% confidence interval, 15.6% to 45.6%). In seven patients with measurable nonosseous disease, there was one PR (14%) and one minor response (MR). In 28 patients with assessable pain, major pain responses occurred in 12 (42.9%). PSA response (> or = 50% decrease times three measurements) was predictive of major pain response with a 93.7% specificity, a 50% sensitivity, and a positive predictive value of 85.7%. CONCLUSION: We conclude that EMP and vinblastine is an active combination in hormone-refractory prostate cancer.

Aged↗
PubMed1997

Phase II trial of 96-hour paclitaxel plus oral estramustine phosphate in metastatic hormone-refractory prostate cancer.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the antitumor activity of 96-hour paclitaxel and daily oral estramustine phosphate (EMP) in patients with metastatic hormone-refractory prostate cancer (HRPC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Thirty-four patients with adenocarcinoma of the prostate that progressed after one or more hormonal therapies and a trial of antiandrogen withdrawal were enrolled onto this phase II trial. Patients received paclitaxel 120 mg/m2 by 96-hour intravenous (i.v.) infusion on days 1 through 4 of each 21-day cycle, together with daily oral EMP 600 mg/m2/d, continuously. RESULTS: Four of nine patients with measurable disease had objective responses (one complete response [CR] and three partial responses [PRs]) in liver (two patients) or nodes (two patients) of 2, 6, 8, and 20 months' duration. Of 25 assessable patients with metastases limited to bone, 14 had a > or = 50% decline in pretreatment prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level sustained for at least 6 weeks and seven had a > or = 80% decline. Overall, 17 of 32 patients (53.1%) with elevated pretreatment PSA levels had a > or = 50% decline of PSA and nine (28.1%) had a > or = 80% decrease. The main toxicities (> or = grade 2) were nausea, fluid retention, and fatigue, which occurred in 33%, 33%, and 24.2% of patients. Median time to progression, based on increasing PSA level and other clinical criteria, was 22.5 weeks. The estimated median overall survival time is 69 weeks. CONCLUSION: The combination of EMP and 96-hour paclitaxel is an active regimen for patients with HRPC. These results further support the therapeutic strategy of combining agents that impair microtubule function by complementary mechanisms.

Adenocarcinoma↗
PubMed1998

Phase I and pharmacologic study of estramustine phosphate and short infusions of paclitaxel in women with solid tumors.

PURPOSE: We sought to determine the tolerance of estramustine phosphate (EMP) combined with a 3-hour paclitaxel infusion in women with solid paclitaxel-pretreated solid tumors. Paclitaxel pharmacology was to be studied at the recommended phase II dose. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Paclitaxel was administered to cohorts of at least three assessable patients at doses of 150, 180, 210, and 225 mg/m2, while EMP was given at 900 and 1,200 mg/m2/d in divided doses orally for 2 days preceding and on the day of paclitaxel. The pharmacologic study was performed at 225 mg/m2 paclitaxel given in the absence and 3 weeks later in the presence of EMP 900 mg/m2/d. RESULTS: Thirty-eight patients received a total of 178 courses. Grade 3 nausea, vomiting, and diarrhea were common at EMP 1,200 mg/m2 and paclitaxel 225 mg/ m2; this was considered the maximum-tolerated dose. Since these toxicities appeared related to EMP, the pharmacologic study used a dose of 900 mg/m2 of this agent with 225 mg/m2 paclitaxel. Antitumor activity was documented against breast and ovarian cancers at all levels. Paclitaxel pharmacokinetics without and with EMP did not differ. CONCLUSION: EMP 900 mg/m2 for 3 days and 225 mg/m2 paclitaxel by 3-hour infusion are well tolerated; antitumor activity was seen in women with paclitaxel-pretreated solid tumors. This apparent enhancement of antitumor effects is unlikely to be mediated by P-glycoprotein.

Adult↗
PubMed2006

Quality of life and pain in advanced stage prostate cancer: results of a Southwest Oncology Group randomized trial comparing docetaxel and estramustine to mitoxantrone and prednisone.

PURPOSE: Palliation of bone pain can be achieved in men with androgen-independent prostate cancer treated with docetaxel and estramustine (DE) or mitoxantrone and prednisone (MP). While Southwest Oncology Group trial 99-16 demonstrated a survival improvement of DE over MP, the study also was designed to compare the palliation of disease-related symptoms. METHODS: Pain palliation and global quality of life (QOL) were the two primary patient-reported outcomes. Pain was measured with the Present Pain Intensity scale of the McGill Pain Questionnaire-Short Form. The European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Core Quality of Life Questionnaire C30 (QLQ-C30) and its Prostate Cancer Module (PR25) measured QOL and symptom status. Pain and analgesic use were measured at random assignment, every cycle for eight cycles, and 1 year from random assignment; the QLQ-C30 and the PR25 were administered at random assignment, before cycle four (week 10) and cycle eight (month 6) and at 1 year. In addition to the primary intent-to-treat, missing at random analysis, sensitivity analyses were performed to assess robustness of global QOL conclusions under alternative informative missing data assumptions. RESULTS: Six hundred seventy four eligible patients received DE (n = 338) or MP (n = 336). In an intention-to-treat analysis, median overall survival was 17.5 months for the DE arm and 15.6 months for the MP arm (P = .02). There were no statistically significant differences in pain palliation between the treatment arms. The sensitivity analyses showed a consistent lack of statistically significant global QOL differences for the two arms. CONCLUSION: DE had superior clinical efficacy (overall survival, time-to-progression, and prostate-specific antigen declines) with similar global QOL and pain palliation in the MP arm.

Aged↗
PubMed2006

Docetaxel, estramustine, and 15-month androgen deprivation for men with prostate-specific antigen progression after definitive local therapy for prostate cancer.

PURPOSE: Androgen-deprivation therapy (ADT) is effective for relapsed prostate cancer, but is rarely curative. The purpose of this trial was to determine the feasibility, toxicity, and prostate-specific antigen (PSA) response of chemotherapy and limited ADT for men with PSA relapse. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Eligible men had an increasing PSA and no metastases after prostatectomy and/or radiation for localized disease. Treatment consisted of four cycles of docetaxel (70 mg/m2) every 21 days and estramustine 280 mg tid on days 1 through 5. After chemotherapy, goserelin acetate and bicalutamide were prescribed for 15 months. RESULTS: Sixty-two patients were enrolled. A complete PSA response (CR) was defined as PSA at or below the assay-specific lower limit. The proportion of patients with CR after chemotherapy, after ADT, and at 1 year after completion of ADT was 53%, 63%, and 36%, respectively. Testosterone was more than 100 ng/dL (median, 250 ng/dL) 1 year after completion of ADT in 97% of patients. Patients with a PSA less than 3.0 ng/mL at enrollment had a significantly longer time to progression (TTP; P = .0004). Of 56 patients who were observed at least 1 year after completion of ADT, 23 (41%) have not experienced progression as of their last follow-up. The median TTP is 34 months from treatment initiation (maximum, 74 months free from progression). CONCLUSION: Chemotherapy plus ADT was feasible for early prostate cancer relapse. Forty-one percent of men who are at least 1 year after completion of ADT with recovered testosterone have not experienced progression. This approach is being tested in a randomized trial with investigation of predictors of response.

Aged↗
PubMed2006

Combination chemotherapy with estramustine phosphate, ifosfamide and cisplatin for hormone-refractory prostate cancer.

We evaluated the efficiency and toxicity of estramustine phosphate (ECT), ifosfamide (IFM) and cisplatin (CDDP) combination chemotherapy in twenty-one patients with hormone-refractory prostate cancer (HRPC), for which there is currently no effective treatment. Patients received a daily dose of 560 mg ECT in combination with 1.2 g/m2 IFM on days 1 to 5 and 70 mg/m2 CDDP on day 1. This combination therapy was given every 3 to 4 weeks. An objective response of more than 50% reduction in prostate-specific antigen was observed in 9 of 18 patients (50%), and a more than 50% reduction in bi-dimensionally measurable soft-tissue lesions was observed in 2 of 7 patients (29%). The median duration of response among the cases showing partial response was 40 weeks, while the median duration of response of overall partial-response plus stable cases was 30 weeks. The median survival duration of all cases was 47 weeks. Toxicity was modest and acceptable. In conclusion, the ECT, IFM and CDDP combination chemotherapy regimen is a viable treatment option for HRPC. However, in comparison with our previous chemotherapy regimen of IFM and CDDP, no additional long-lasting effects resulting from the inclusion of ECT could be affirmed.

Adult↗
PubMed1977

Treatment of advanced prostatic carcinoma with estramustine phosphate (Estracyt).

Estramustine phosphate (Estracyt) was used in the treatment of 154 patients with carcinoma of the prostate in stage IV. Sixty-three patients were given Estracyt from the outset (primary treatment group) and 91 had previously received some other endocrine therapy (secondary treatment group). All of the patients were observed for more than one year. The drug was given intravenously and/or orally. Objective remissions occurred in 46 (73.0%) of the 63 patients in the primary treatment group and subjective remissions in all the objective responders and in 12 additional patients (92.0%). The corresponding figures for the secondary treatment group were 28 (30.7%) and 52 (57.1%) of 91. The side-effects were negligible, and the drug was well tolerated. No cumulative toxic effect was observed in patients who had been receiving the treatment for more than five years. In our opinion the compound is valuable in the treatment of advanced prostatic carcinoma (stage IV).

Acid Phosphatase↗