Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Elbow Prosthesis”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 379 records · Page 21Linked to original sources
PubMed1987

The value of stump split skin grafting following amputation for trauma in adult upper and lower limb amputees.

One hundred and twenty adult patients were reviewed in whom split skin grafts were applied to the stump following traumatic amputation of the upper limb (44 amputees) or lower limb (76 amputees). The average follow-up period was seven and a half years after initial amputation. There was delay in prosthetic fitting in all patients. Approximately one third of patients complained of occasional minor ulceration, controlled by removing the prosthesis for a few days or modification of the prosthesis. Further revision surgery, including excision of the grafted skin often combined with proximal bone resection, but not removal of the proximal joint, was necessary in 29% of below-elbow amputees and approximately 50% of below and above-knee amputees. At the above-elbow level, use of skin grafts allowed prosthetic fitting because of preservation of sufficient length of the stump. Despite the fact that revision surgery may often be necessary, split skin grafting has a definite place in the early management of the stump following traumatic limb amputation in the adult. Preservation of stump length with the knee or elbow joint allows easier rehabilitation and lower energy expenditure when using the prosthesis. Partial foot amputation, when combined with skin grafting usually requires subsequent revision to a more proximal level to obtain a satisfactory result.

Amputation Stumps↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Kinematics and constraint of total elbow arthroplasty.

Total elbow arthroplasty has been a valuable procedure for patients with rheumatoid arthritis, posttraumatic arthritis, osteoarthritis, and failed reconstructive procedures of the elbow. Many of the original designs were simple hinge joints, in which intrinsic complete constraint of the articulation predictably resulted in failure by loosening. Subsequently, the development of elbow prostheses diverged into 2 general types: loose hinge (linked) and resurfacing (unlinked). The main concern with such development is instability, which is attributable to numerous factors including prosthesis design, ligament integrity, and position of the prosthesis. A series of studies have been performed to examine the intrinsic constraint of various total elbow arthroplasty designs, as well as the joint laxity after implantation in cadaveric specimens.

Arthroplasty, Replacement↗
PubMed1989

Stress distribution in the ulna following a hinged elbow arthroplasty. A finite element analysis.

The failure rates for total elbow arthroplasty, in comparison to those for hip arthroplasty, are quite high, and a precise understanding of the underlying causes still remains elusive. The presence of abnormal stresses is a known factor that accelerates loosening of hip and knee arthroplasties. Although a large number of biomechanical studies have led to a better understanding of elbow joint kinetics, very little is known about the stress distribution in this joint. The implantation of a Coonrad humeral component increases stresses in the bone and cement adjacent to the stem tip and hinge regions. An analysis of implanted ulnar stresses and a comparison of those stresses to implanted humeral stresses would improve our understanding of hinged elbow arthroplasty. For this reason, the distribution of mechanical stresses in the ulna are investigated in this study. Using a specially developed casting and sectioning technique, three-dimensional finite element meshes were obtained from an intact human cadaver ulna and an ulna fitted with a Coonrad prosthesis. The material properties were derived from values presented in the literature. Stress distributions in response to axial compression, axial torque, and anteroposterior (AP) force were computed. The cancellous bone and cement regions adjacent to the stem tip of the prosthesis exhibited higher stresses than those in the same regions of the intact case. The higher stresses in the ulna with an implanted prosthesis, as compared to the intact model, might initiate loosening or failure of the prosthesis. The stresses in the cortical bone region adjacent to the prosthesis head were decreased. This is consistent with the clinical observations of bone atrophy following total elbow arthroplasty.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Aged↗
PubMed1993

Treatment of difficult fractures and nonunions of the humerus and elbow with a modified Küntscher nail.

A series of fourteen difficult fractures and nonunions of the humerus and elbow have been treated over a period of twenty-eight years with a modified Kuntscher Nail. A total of twenty-six operative attempts had been previously made in this group of fourteen patients. One patient had eight failed surgeries prior to treatment. Slots were placed along the spine of the nail for transfixion with screws. In two instances additional modification of the Kuntscher nail was made by attaching a plate to the end of the nail for fixation to the ulna after retrograde insertion into the humerus. One such device was used to fuse the elbow. The other was used to stabilize a low nonunion in which the elbow was already fused. Union was obtained in nine cases with failure in five. Four of the failures united with one additional surgery. The one failed case had a surgical neck fracture which was eventually treated with a Neer prosthesis. The method described may not be superior to other methods; however, it can be successful in obtaining union in difficult elbow and humerus fractures or nonunions resulting from multiple failed prior procedures.

Adult↗
PubMed2001

Arthroplasty with a metal radial head for unreconstructible fractures of the radial head.

BACKGROUND: Treatment of unreconstructible comminuted fractures of the radial head remains controversial. There is limited information on the outcome of management of these injuries with arthroplasty with a metal radial head implant. METHODS: The functional outcomes of arthroplasties with a metal radial head implant for the treatment of twenty-five displaced, unreconstructible fractures of the radial head in twenty-four consecutive patients (mean age, fifty-four years) were evaluated at a mean of thirty-nine months (minimum, two years). There were ten Mason type-III and fifteen Mason-Johnston type-IV injuries. Two of these injuries were isolated, and twenty-three were associated with other elbow fractures and/or ligamentous injuries. RESULTS: At the time of follow-up, Short Form-36 (SF-36) summary scores suggested that overall health-related quality of life was within the normal range (physical component = 47 +/- 10, and mental component = 49 +/- 13). Other outcome scales indicated mild disability of the upper extremity (Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand score = 17 +/- 19), wrist (Patient-Rated Wrist Evaluation score = 17 +/- 21 and Wrist Outcome Score = 60 +/- 10), and elbow (Mayo Elbow Performance Index = 80 +/- 16). According to the Mayo Elbow Performance Index, three results were graded as poor; five, as fair; and seventeen, as good or excellent. The poor and fair outcomes were associated with concomitant injury in two patients, a history of a psychiatric disorder in three, comorbidity in two, a Workers' Compensation claim in two, and litigation in one. Subjective patient satisfaction averaged 9.2 on a scale of 1 to 10. Elbow flexion of the injured extremity averaged 140 degrees +/- 9 degrees; extension, -8 degrees +/- 7 degrees; pronation, 78 degrees +/- 9 degrees; and supination, 68 degrees +/- 10 degrees. A significant loss of elbow flexion and extension and of forearm supination occurred in the affected extremity, which also had significantly less strength of isometric forearm pronation (17%) and supination (18%) as well as significantly less grip strength (p < 0.05). Asymptomatic bone lucencies surrounded the stem of the implant in seventeen of the twenty-five elbows. Valgus stability was restored, and proximal radial migration did not occur. Complications, all of which resolved, included one complex regional pain syndrome, one ulnar neuropathy, one posterior interosseous nerve palsy, one episode of elbow stiffness, and one wound infection. CONCLUSIONS: Patients treated with a metal radial head implant for a severely comminuted radial head fracture will have mild-to-moderate impairment of the physical capability of the elbow and wrist. At the time of short-term follow-up, arthroplasty with a metal radial head implant was found to have been a safe and effective treatment option for patients with an unreconstructible radial head fracture; however, long-term follow-up is still needed.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2000

The floating radial head prosthesis for comminuted radial head fractures: a multicentric study.

We report our experience with the floating radial head prosthesis of Judet for comminuted fractures of the radial head. We present the results in 15 patients with a mean follow-up of 25.2 months. Thirteen prostheses were inserted for acute Mason III fractures of the radial head, and 2 were inserted for chronic problems after radial head fracture. According to the Mayo Elbow Performance Index there were 7 excellent, 3 good, 1 fair and 2 poor results in the group with acute injuries. In this group, one prosthesis was removed after 8 months for severely decreased elbow function. In the group with chronic problems, there were 2 fair results. There were no dislocations or prosthesis fractures. None of the prostheses showed signs of loosening. Three patients in the acute group developed wrist pain, and in one patient in the chronic group, preexisting wrist pain disappeared after insertion of the radial head prosthesis. Our short-term results suggest that the floating radial head prosthesis is a suitable solution for early or delayed treatment of Mason type III fractures, either isolated or associated with more complex injuries.

Adult↗
PubMed1984

An analysis of extended physiological proprioception as a prosthesis-control technique.

This research was devoted to an investigation of the practicality and potential effectiveness of applying the concept of extended physiological proprioception (EPP) to the control of upper-limb prostheses. The purpose of this study was to verify that EPP control, implemented by coupling prosthesis function to residual shoulder motion in a position-servo relationship, could be effectively applied in multifunctional prostheses for shoulder disarticulation amputees. Although Simpson has shown that the principle works, the authors wanted to quantify its effectiveness and analyze its limitations. Studies were performed analyzing the feasibility of using shoulder elevation-depression and protraction-retraction as prosthesis control inputs. The results of this study showed that a prosthesis mechanism with nonlimiting dynamic response characteristics and shoulder-activated EPP control of wrist rotation and elbow flexion/extension, exhibited functional characteristics comparable to those of the physiological elbow and wrist as defined by tracking capabilities. The results of this investigation also showed that shoulder-effected position control of prosthesis function has considerably more potential for providing effective control than similarly effected velocity control.

Arm↗
PubMed1994

Extent of disability following traumatic extremity amputation.

Extremity amputation is a devastating injury. Forty-two patients who sustained traumatic limb amputation were contacted 3-57 months (mean, 25 months; median, 24 months) after injury to evaluate residual disability and to determine what factors were associated with a good recovery. There were 35 men and 7 women with ages ranging from 5 to 73 years (mean, 34 years). Amputation was the result of a motor vehicle crash in 18, work-related injury in 11, motorcycle crash in 9, and other causes in 4. There were 46 amputations done: 8 above-knee (AK), 25 below-knee (BK), 5 above-elbow (AE), and 9 below-elbow (BE). Twenty patients reported no problems with their prosthesis, 8 had major (e.g., infections) and 6 had minor (e.g., skin breakdown) problems. Eight patients did not receive or did not use a prosthesis. Fourteen patients were discharged to an inpatient rehabilitation facility, 25 to home with outpatient rehabilitation, and 3 had no rehabilitation. Of those who worked before their injury, only 50% returned to work. The mean and median time to return to work were 14 and 12 months, respectively. Three of five full-time students returned to school. The amputation level in patients returning to work or school was BK in 12, BE in 3, and AE in 1. No patient with a AK amputation and only 1 (9%) patient with a work-related injury returned to work. Associated injuries or inpatient rehabilitation did not correlate with returning to work. Eighty-eight percent of patients were satisfied with their adjustment and could perform all activities of daily living.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Adolescent↗
PubMed2005

Total elbow arthroplasty after interposition arthroplasty for elbow arthritis.

BACKGROUND: Interposition arthroplasty is an option for the treatment of arthritis of the elbow. Conversion to a total elbow arthroplasty can be considered later, when the patient reaches a suitable age. We investigated the results of conversion of an interpositional elbow arthroplasty to a semiconstrained total elbow arthroplasty in a series of patients. METHODS: The results of twelve consecutive linked semiconstrained total elbow arthroplasties in twelve patients who had had a prior interposition arthroplasty for the treatment of degenerative arthritis of the elbow were evaluated at an average of ten years postoperatively. The average age at the time of the total elbow arthroplasty was fifty years, and the average interval from the interposition arthroplasty to the total elbow arthroplasty was 9.9 years. Pain and elbow performance as measured with the Mayo Elbow Performance Score were assessed in a retrospective chart review and an evaluation of questionnaires, and postoperative radiographs were reviewed. RESULTS: At the time of the latest follow-up, postoperative pain was rated as mild or none in ten of the twelve patients, and the result was rated as subjectively satisfactory in ten patients. The average Mayo Elbow Performance Score improved from 32.1 points (range, 10 to 70 points) preoperatively to 80.4 points (range, 40 to 100 points) postoperatively (p < 0.001). According to these objective criteria, there were three excellent, six good, one fair, and two poor results. All of the elbows were stable following the arthroplasty. Radiographs demonstrated a well-fixed prosthesis in all but one patient who had extensive osteolysis at the site of the humeral component. One other patient had radiographic evidence of bushing wear. Both of these patients required revision procedures. CONCLUSIONS: Semiconstrained total elbow arthroplasty can be performed successfully in patients with a prior interposition arthroplasty. Reliable pain relief and a satisfactory result can be achieved in most patients.

Adult↗
PubMed1993

[Tuberculous septic polyarthritis caused by Mycobacterium bovis].

Infections due to Mycobacterium bovis have become uncommon. We report a case with polyarthritis and cutaneous nodules suggesting a rheumatic disease. This 61 year old male under corticosteroid therapy for asthma developed febrile arthritis of the right wrist and cutaneous nodules that resolved rapidly under treatment with penicillin M and an aminoglycoside. Six months later, he developed arthritis of the right wrist and both elbows, as well as infection of a right hip prosthesis. The left wrist and left knee were then affected concomitantly. The cutaneous nodules recurred. A giant cell granuloma without caseous necrosis was found upon examination of a biopsy specimen from a nodule. Granulomatous lesions with caseous necrosis were seen in a specimen of synovial membrane from the right wrist. Antituberculous treatment ensured resolution of the arthritides and nodules but failed to prevent loosening of the hip prosthesis. Acid-fast bacilli were found in the specimens taken during removal of the prosthesis. After three months, cultures of synovial membrane specimens from the knee grew Mycobacterium bovis.

Arthritis, Infectious↗
PubMed1985

[Corium interpositionplasty of the elbow and wrist joint].

The problems involved in the reconstruction of upper extremities, in particular their differentiated movement and the intentionality of the patient concerned are briefly discussed. Three cases presenting typical indications for the interposition of the dermis in the wrist and elbow joints are presented. On the basis of our observations, the indications for implantation of a prosthesis are rare.

Adult↗
PubMed2000

Semiconstrained total elbow arthroplasty for ankylosed and stiff elbows.

BACKGROUND: Total elbow arthroplasty can be a valuable option for the treatment of ankylosed or very stiff elbows. METHODS: A semiconstrained total elbow arthroplasty was performed in thirteen patients (fourteen elbows) with a preoperative range of elbow motion of 30 degrees or less. Nine elbows were fused or ankylosed preoperatively. The mean age at the time of the surgery was fifty years (range, twenty-four to seventy-nine years). The etiology of the stiffness was trauma for eleven elbows, juvenile rheumatoid arthritis for two, and rheumatoid arthritis for one. RESULTS: After a mean duration of follow-up of sixty-three months, the result was excellent for four elbows, good for four, fair for one, and poor for five, according to the Mayo elbow performance score. The mean arc of flexion improved from 7 degrees (range, 0 to 30 degrees) preoperatively to 67 degrees (range, 10 to 115 degrees) after the surgery. The most important factor that influenced the final result was the presence of ectopic bone surrounding the elbow joint. There were seven complications. Infection developed in five elbows. Three elbows had a superficial infection, which did not compromise the final result in two and which was treated with a myocutaneous flap in one with skin necrosis, with an excellent result. Deep infection developed in two other elbows. Both had an unsatisfactory result, one after implant removal and one after several debridements and retention of the prosthesis. Two patients sustained a fracture because of a loose component, and the prosthesis was revised. Four patients who lost motion within the first month following the surgery had a manipulation under anesthesia. CONCLUSIONS: Semiconstrained total elbow arthroplasty is a useful option for patients with an ankylosed or a very stiff elbow and results in a considerable improvement of motion. Because of the nature of the underlying pathology, complications, including reoperation, are frequent, but the risk can be lessened by careful preoperative planning and surgical technique. Replacement is the preferred option in patients who are more than sixty years of age, but it is also a good choice in younger patients if there is no other viable option.

Adult↗
PubMed1979

Silastic replacement of the head of the radius in trauma.

Eighteen patients with marginal depressed or comminuted fractures of the head of the radius, nine of whom had an associated posterior dislocation of the elbow, had a Silastic replacement carried out shortly after injury. After an average follow-up of twenty-six months satisfactory clinical results were observed in seventeen cases; three prostheses broke. The prosthesis has been particularly effective in the group with an associated posterior dislocation of the elbow.

Female↗
PubMed2001

The functional outcome with metallic radial head implants in the treatment of unstable elbow fractures: a long-term review.

BACKGROUND: A long-term review of metal prosthetic radial head replacement in patients with radial head fractures associated with gross instability of the elbow has been performed. METHOD: Twenty patients were reviewed using a modified Mayo Clinic functional rating index system. The mean follow-up was 12.1 years, with a range from 6 to 29 years. RESULTS: Results were excellent in 12 patients, good in 4 patients, fair in 2 patients, and poor in 2 patients. A metal radial head replacement restored elbow stability when fracture of the radial head occurred in combination with dislocation of the elbow, rupture of the medial collateral ligament, fracture of the proximal ulna, and/or fracture of the coronoid process. CONCLUSION: We conclude that a metal radial head prosthesis has select indications. We advocate its use when the radial head cannot be reconstructed in the setting of a clinically unstable elbow. Results suggest that it functions well on a long-term basis.

Adult↗
PubMed2002

Biometry of the radial head: biomechanical implications in pronation and supination.

The aim of this study was to perform biometry of the proximal extremity of the radius and to characterize the shape of the radial head. Knowledge of the size and shape of the radial head is necessary for the creation of a radial head prosthesis that is anatomically and biomechanically correct. Twenty-seven measurements, focused on the proximal extremity, were done on 96 radii. The shape of the radial head was determined by the difference between the maximum diameter and the minimum diameter. We considered the shape to be circular when the difference was less than 1 mm, and elliptical when the difference was greater than 1 mm. The shape of the radial head was compared with the neck/diaphysis angle. Fifty-seven percent of radial heads were elliptical and 43% were circular. When the head was elliptical the maximum diameter was 22 mm +/-2.9 and the minimum diameter was 20 mm +/-2.8 ( P<0.001). When the head was circular the maximum diameter was 21.2 mm +/-2.4 and the minimum diameter was 20.4 mm +/-2.4 ( P<0.14). The angle between the neck and the diaphysis varied with regard to the shape of the radial head. It was 166.75 degrees +/-3 for the circular heads and 168.62 degrees +/-3.2 for the elliptical heads ( P<0.01). The biomechanics of the circular shape and the elliptical shape are different, involving an adaptation of the angle between the neck and the radial diaphysis. This difference must be taken in consideration in the design of a radial head prosthesis.

Anthropometry↗