[Testing of visual acuity and space perception using a new sieve test].
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
SEARCH · Search PubMed
Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.
Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
An investigation was undertaken into whether judgments of time-to-contact between a laterally moving object and a bar are based on the direct perception of an optical variable (tau), or on the ratio between the perceived distance and perceived velocity of the object. A moving background was used to induce changes in the perceived velocities without changing the optical variables that specify time-to-contact. Background motion induced large systematic errors in the estimated time-to-contact. It is concluded that the judgment of time-to-contact is primarily based on the ratio between the perceived distance and the perceived velocity, and not on tau.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
When a horizontal or vertical magnifier is placed before one eye, a frontoparallel surface appears slanted. It appears slanted away from the eye with horizontal magnification (geometric effect) and toward the eye with vertical magnification (induced effect). According to current theory, the apparent slant in the geometric and induced effects should increase with viewing distance. The geometric effect does scale with distance, but there are conflicting reports as to whether the induced effect does. Ogle (1938 Archives of Ophthalmology 20 604-623) reported that settings in slant-nulling tasks increase systematically with viewing distance, but Gillam et al (1988 Perception & Psychophysics 44 473-483) and Rogers et al (1995 Perception 24 Supplement, 33) reported that settings in slant-estimation tasks do not. We re-examined this apparent contradiction. First, we conducted two experiments whose results are consistent with the literature and thus replicate the apparent contradiction. Next, we analyzed the signals available for stereoscopic slant perception and developed a general model of perceived slant. The model is based on the assumption that the visual system knows the reliability of various slant-estimation methods for the viewing situation under consideration. The model's behavior explains the contradiction in the literature. The model also predicts that, by manipulating eye position, apparent slant can be made to increase with distance for vertical, but not for horizontal, magnification. This prediction was confirmed experimentally.
Two experiments were performed to study the ability of blindfolded subjects to estimate distance on the basis of proprioceptive cues. In the first experiment, subjects judged the length of metal rods that they were allowed to explore freely. With this access to positional as well as other cues, subjects' estimates were a nearly linear function of actual length. These data closely paralleled control measurements obtained under conditions of visual, rather than haptic, inspection. In the second experiment, each subject slid his or her index finger laterally along a straight path delimited by the apparatus, and then gave a magnitude estimate of the distance through which the finger had moved. Velocity of movement was manipulated by asking subjects, on each trial, to move at one of five speeds ranging from "very slow" to "very fast"; these instructions elicited velocities spanning a 100-to-1 range. Magnitude estimates of distance in this second experiment increased as a function of actual distance, but decreased as a function of velocity. This latter phenomenon resembles the dependence of perceived distance on velocity that has been shown by other investigators to occur when a stimulus object is drawn across the skin. The data of the present study are consistent with the hypothesis that the perceived length of an active movement depends on a combination of movement and position signals from primary and secondary sensory fibers in muscle spindles.
Two experiments were directed at the comparison between two perspectives on the perception of size achieved by probing the gap between two occluded distal surfaces by means of a hand-held rod. One perspective was the classical size-distance invariance hypothesis developed for the problem of visual size perception with a central role for perceived distance; the other was the hypothesis that the extended haptic perception of gap size is specific to a physical invariant lambda of the dynamics of probing. Experiment 1 examined the relation between hepatically perceived gap size and haptically perceived gap distance. No causal connection between the two was found, and all the variance in perceived size was accounted for by lambda. Experiment 2 manipulated the rotational inertia of the probe. Its effect was different for the two perceptions of size and distance, underscoring their independence. The indifference of perceived size to perceived distance was discussed in reference to identifying invariants for both the haptic and the visual perception of size at a distance.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
The question of whether motion parallax is calibrated by convergence or by apparent distance for depth perception was addressed in three experiments. In Experiment 1, a random dot parallactic display was viewed monocularly at a distance of 80 cm, and the convergence angles were set for distances of 40, 60, and 80 cm. Averaged apparent depth was not different across conditions. In Experiment 2, a display consisting of one surface showing dollar bills and one surface showing random dots was viewed monocularly at a distance of 80 cm. It was presented at two different apparent distances, which were manipulated by varying the size of the dollar bills. In one condition, normally sized dollar bills were presented, and in another condition, the size was reduced by 30%. The averaged apparent depth associated with the small-bill display was larger than the depth associated with the normally sized bill display. In Experiment 3, a random dot display was viewed monocularly at 120 cm. In the primary condition, the random dot display was viewed with an induction screen at 80 cm, and it was moved from side to side such that it appeared stationary and close to the plane of the induction screen. In a comparison condition, the display was viewed without the induction screen and was moving from side to side at 120 cm. In another comparison condition, the display was again viewed without the induction screen but was stationary at 120 cm. Observers adjusted the extent of motion parallax so that apparent depth was 1 cm. The mean extent of parallax was larger in the primary conditio.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
Perception of size is assessed by having observers adjust a comparison target at a fixed distance to match the size of a standard located at different distances. Results depend on instructions, target orientation, and available stimulus cues. A mathematical theory assumes that the brain performs an inverse transformation on the proximal information impinging on the retina to recover the original distal size of the target. Results depend on the target visual angle, and the effective target distance and orientation applied in performing the inverse transformation. Effective values are linked to instructions, target location, and stimulus cues. Two models are developed and successfully fit to empirical data. One emphasizes the distance parameter; the second, the orientation parameter.
Observers viewed two alternating frames, each consisting of three rectangular bars displaced laterally by one cycle in one frame with respect to the other. At long interframe intervals (IFIs) observers perceived a group of three bars moving as a whole (group motion), and at short IFIs the overlapping elements in the two frames appeared stationary, while the third element appeared to move from one end of the display to the other (element motion). The upper temporal limit for perceiving element motion was reduced when bars with blurred edges were used and when either frame duration or bar size was increased. However, when inner and outer elements had different sizes, the element motion percept was dominant up to 230 ms IFI. These findings may be interpreted in terms of spatial tuning of motion mechanisms involved in the perception of bistable apparent motion.
A long row of evenly spaced dots is displaced on successive frames by half the distance between the dots. Although these stimuli are directionally ambiguous, spatially and temporally coherent unidirectional and oscillatory motion patterns are perceived as a result of the temporal persistence of competing in-phase and anti-phase directional biases, respectively. The perceiver's spatial scale is critical is determining whether dots are near enough to favor an in-phase bias or far enough apart to favor an anti-phase bias. The results are explained by a differential-gradient model of cooperative interaction, which specifies that the strength of facilitating (excitatory) interactions among motion detectors with similar directional selectivity falls off with distance at a greater rate than the strength of competing inhibiting interactions.
The mature visual system possesses mechanisms that enable invariant perception of the contrast of an object and its features as the object undergoes changes in distance. This phenomenon, which has been called contrast constancy, obtains at suprathreshold contrasts only. Some models of contrast constancy assume the presence of narrowband spatial-frequency channels. An implication of M.S. Banks, B.R. Stephens, and E.E. Hartmann (1985, Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 40, 501-527) is that contrast constancy should not be observed at 6 weeks but may be observed at 12 weeks. We examined this implication by investigating the development of contrast constancy in 6- and 12-week-old infants. Two sine wave gratings, differing in spatial frequency by a factor of 3, were presented side-by-side. The contrast of one grating was varied in order to estimate the contrast at which preference for the two gratings was equal. The equal preference points for 6-week-olds were predictable from their contrast thresholds. The 12-week-olds' equal preference points for low-contrast stimuli were predictable from their contrast thresholds, but those for intermediate and high-contrast stimuli were not. Thus, if one accepts the assumption that equal preference in infants is analogous to apparent contrast matches in adults, these data imply that contrast constancy is observed at 12 weeks but not 6 weeks. The perceptual consequences of this developmental transition are discussed.
A light target moving at a constant velocity in horizontal direction and disappearing at a locus determined by the experimenter is presented to the subjects in the experiments. The task of the subjects is to track its movement with their eyes and to determine the place of its disappearance using a scale fixed on the screen. Under these conditions they systematically mislocate the locus of disappearance in the direction of the eye movement. The mislocation is in linear dependence on the velocity of tracking and, moreover, it depends on the locus of disappearance of the target. The error is smaller when the target disappears at the end of tracking. The theory that mislocation is due to perception time is rejected.
We investigated the role of extraretinal information in the perception of absolute distance. In a computer-simulated environment, monocular observers judged the distance of objects positioned at different locations in depth while performing frontoparallel movements of the head. The objects were spheres covered with random dots subtending three different visual angles. Observers viewed the objects ateye level, either in isolation or superimposed on a ground floor. The distance and size of the spheres were covaried to suppress relative size information. Hence, the main cues to distance were the motion parallax and the extraretinal signals. In three experiments, we found evidence that (1) perceived distance is correlated with simulated distance in terms of precision and accuracy, (2) the accuracy in the distance estimate is slightly improved by the presence of a ground-floor surface, (3) the perceived distance is not altered significantly when the visual field size increases, and (4) the absolute distance is estimated correctly during self-motion. Conversely, stationary subjects failed to report absolute distance when they passively observed a moving object producing the same retinal stimulation, unless they could rely on knowledge of the three-dimensional movements.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.