Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Digoxin”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 379 records · Page 21Linked to original sources
PubMed1998

A case series of hospitalized patients with elevated digoxin levels.

PURPOSE: Although there is renewed enthusiasm for the use of digoxin in patients with heart failure, current dosing guidelines are based on a nomogram published in 1974. We studied the incidence of and risk factors for elevated digoxin levels in patients admitted to a community hospital, and compared their dosage regimens to published guidelines. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: We reviewed the charts of all patients who had serum digoxin levels greater than 2.4 ng/mL during a 6-month period. We collected demographic and clinical data, indications for digoxin use, digoxin dosage, concurrent medications, laboratory data, and clinical and electrocardiographic features of digoxin toxicity. RESULTS: Of the 1,433 patients with digoxin assays, 115 (8%) patients had elevated levels. Of the 82 patients with complete records and correctly timed digoxin levels, 59 (72%) had electrocardiographic or clinical features of digoxin toxicity. Patients with serum digoxin levels >2.4 ng/mL were slightly older (78 +/- 8 versus 73 +/- 9 years of age; P = 0.12) and had greater serum creatinine levels (3.1 +/- 7.3 versus 1.4 +/- 0.3 mg/dL; P = 0.01) than those with levels < or =2.4 ng/mL. Forty-seven patients had elevated digoxin levels on admission, including 21 patients admitted for digoxin toxicity. Impaired or worsening renal function contributed to high levels in 37 patients, and a drug interaction was a contributory factor in 10 cases. Twenty (43%) of these patients were taking the recommended maintenance dose based on the scheme employed in the Digitalis Investigation Group study. Thirty-five patients developed high digoxin levels while in hospital. In 26 patients, this followed a loading dose of digoxin for the control of rapid atrial fibrillation. Impaired renal function was implicated in all of these patients. Despite the elevated digoxin level, rate control was achieved in only 11 patients of these patients. CONCLUSIONS: Elevated digoxin levels and clinical toxicity remains a common adverse drug reaction. Elderly patients, particularly those with impaired renal function and low body weights, are at the greatest risk. As published digoxin nomograms often result in toxicity, clinical variables need to be monitored. In patients with congestive heart failure and normal sinus rhythm the potential benefit of digoxin is small; thus, patients should receive a dose that minimizes the risk of toxicity. For patients with new onset atrial fibrillation, other agents may be preferable for rate control.

Age Factors↗
PubMed2006

New enzyme-linked chemiluminescent immunosorbent digoxin assay is free from interference of Chinese medicine DanShen.

DanShen is a traditional Chinese medicine indicated for cardiovascular diseases. The potential interference of DanShen with serum digoxin measurement was investigated using a new enzyme-linked chemiluminescent immunosorbent (ECLIA) digoxin assay. Aliquots of drug-free serum were supplemented with ethyl acetate extract of DanShen (4 different brands studied), and apparent digoxin concentrations were measured by the ECLIA as well as fluorescence polarization immunoassay (FPIA) and a turbidimetric assay for comparison. Mice were also fed 4 DanShen preparations and apparent digoxin concentrations were subsequently measured. In another experiment, serum pools containing digoxin were further supplemented with DanShen extracts and digoxin concentrations were measured again by all 3 assays. No apparent digoxin concentration was observed when aliquots of drug-free serum pools were supplemented with DanShen and digoxin concentrations were measured by the ECLIA or the turbidimetric assay. In contrast, significant apparent digoxin concentrations were observed using FPIA, and the highest apparent digoxin concentration was observed with brand 4 of DanShen extract. Similarly, when mice were fed with this herb, significant apparent digoxin concentrations were also observed using FPIA, but neither ECLIA nor turbidimetric assay showed any apparent digoxin concentration. When aliquots of digoxin pool were further supplemented with various DanShen extract, the apparent digoxin concentrations were significantly increased when FPIA was used. In contrast, digoxin concentrations in the presence of DanShen extract compared well with the digoxin concentration of the original pool when ECLIA or turbidimetric assay was used. We conclude that DanShen does not interfere with serum digoxin measurement using a more recently released ECLIA digoxin assay.

Animals↗
PubMed1994

Effect of digoxin on exercise performance in mildly symptomatic patients with idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy and sinus rhythm.

The purpose of this investigation was to evaluate the effect of digoxin on aerobic performance in mildly symptomatic patients with congestive heart failure and sinus rhythm. Ten patients (8 men and 2 women) with idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy (ejection fraction 17 to 33%, mean 27 +/- 4%) who were stable and mildly symptomatic with maintenance digoxin and diuretic therapy were studied. All patients underwent maximal symptom-limited ergometer exercise with analysis of respiratory gases during maintenance digoxin therapy, 4 weeks after digoxin withdrawal, and 4 weeks after digoxin readministration. Exercise capacity was assessed by peak oxygen uptake and anaerobic threshold. Serum digoxin concentration was 1.0 to 1.8 (mean 1.3 +/- 0.2) ng/ml during digoxin therapy, and less than the detectable level after digoxin withdrawal. No patients showed clinical deterioration after digoxin withdrawal. Peak oxygen uptake after digoxin withdrawal (23.7 +/- 3.0 ml/kg/min) did not differ significantly from that during maintenance digoxin therapy (23.8 +/- 2.5 ml/kg/min) or after digoxin readministration (24.1 +/- 2.9 ml/kg/min). The anaerobic threshold after digoxin withdrawal (14.9 +/- 2.5 ml/kg/min) did not differ significantly from that during maintenance digoxin therapy (15.0 +/- 2.1 ml/kg/min) or after digoxin readministration (14.9 +/- 2.2 ml/kg/min). No differences in heart rate and diastolic blood pressure were observed during exercise, but systolic blood pressure during exercise was significantly higher with digoxin therapy (p < 0.05). These results suggest that digoxin has no effect on aerobic performance in mildly symptomatic patients with idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy and sinus rhythm.

Adult↗
PubMed2006

Evaluation of a sex-based difference in the pharmacokinetics of digoxin.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To determine whether a sex-based difference in digoxin pharmacokinetics exists in patients receiving long-term digoxin therapy for chronic heart failure or atrial fibrillation. DESIGN: Single-center, retrospective review of medical records. SETTING: University-based teaching hospital and outpatient clinic. PATIENTS: Sixty-seven adults (32 men, 35 women) with chronic heart failure or atrial fibrillation who were receiving digoxin therapy. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Serum digoxin concentrations and daily digoxin doses were obtained from patients' medical records. Daily doses were adjusted for patients' actual and ideal body weight and body mass index (BMI). The ratio between the serum digoxin concentration and each of the adjusted daily doses of digoxin was compared between men and women. The mean +/- SD serum digoxin concentration was 0.85 +/- 0.51 ng/ml for men compared with 1.02 +/- 0.51 ng/ml for women. Mean +/- SD unadjusted doses of digoxin were 0.180 +/- 0.063 and 0.164 +/- 0.059 mg/day for men and women, respectively; the difference was not statistically significant. Ratios of serum digoxin concentration to daily digoxin doses did not differ by sex when doses were estimated with actual or ideal weight. Only the ratio of the digoxin concentration to the BMI-adjusted dose was significantly different between men and women (0.14 +/- 0.09 and 0.19 +/- 0.11, respectively, p<0.05). CONCLUSION: Sex-based differences in digoxin pharmacokinetics were absent when actual or ideal body weight was used. However, the ratio of serum digoxin concentration to daily digoxin dose adjusted for BMI differed by sex. Because digoxin is distributed to lean body mass, use of the BMI could have overadjusted body weight, leading to inaccurate pharmacokinetic assumptions and calculations. The pharmacokinetics of digoxin do not appear to differ by sex.

Aged↗
PubMed2000

The effect of telmisartan on the steady-state pharmacokinetics of digoxin in healthy male volunteers.

A multiple-dose, open-label, two-period, crossover randomized study was conducted in 12 healthy male volunteers to investigate the effect of multiple-dose telmisartan on the steady-state pharmacokinetics of digoxin. On day 1 of a 7-day medication period, subjects received a loading dose of digoxin 0.5 mg in the morning, followed by an evening dose of digoxin 0.25 mg, either alone or together with telmisartan 120 mg administered in the morning. On the subsequent 6 days, either digoxin 0.25 mg or digoxin 0.25 mg together with telmisartan 120 mg was administered once daily in the morning. Each 7-day medication period was separated by a washout period of > or = 14 days. A steady-state plasma concentration-time profile was assessed for digoxin during each period and for telmisartan during the period with the combined treatment. Multiple-dose telmisartan administered with digoxin resulted in higher serum digoxin concentrations than those observed after digoxin given alone. Geometric mean AUC144-168, Cmax, and Cmin values for digoxin when given in combination with telmisartan were higher by 22%, 50%, and 13%, respectively, compared with values when given alone. However, the 90% confidence interval for the geometric mean of Cmin was within the predefined 80% to 125% range of no interaction. During combination medication, digoxin tmax was shorter and Cmax/AUC144-168 increased, suggesting that the rise in digoxin Cmax may be due to more rapid drug absorption. Study medications were well tolerated, with the incidence, nature, and intensity of adverse events being similar during both medication periods. Also, no changes in vital signs or clinical laboratory tests were observed during the study. Although there was some evidence for a pharmacokinetic interaction between digoxin and telmisartan found in this study, the safety and tolerability of digoxin were unaffected by concurrent administration of telmisartan in the study population. Since any symptoms of overdose are related only to steady state and not peak concentrations and due to the fact that there was a lack of effect on serum trough levels of digoxin in this study, it is unlikely that the findings have any clinical relevance. The magnitude of increase in digoxin concentrations is comparable with increases observed with administration of calcium antagonists, carvedilol, ACE inhibitors such as captopril, and antiarrhythmic drugs such as amiodarone, quinidine, and propafenone. Monitoring of serum digoxin concentrations should be considered when patients first receive telmisartan and in the event of any changes in telmisartan dose.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2002

A comparison between the effects of diltiazem and isosorbide dinitrate on digoxin pharmacodynamics and kinetics in the treatment of patients with chronic ischemic heart failure.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effect of an arteriolar dilator (diltiazem hydrochloride) versus a venodilator (isosorbide dinitrate) on digoxin kinetics and to estimate the efficacy and tolerability of these vasodilators when combined with digoxin for 10 days therapy in patients with congestive heart failure secondary to ischemic heart disease. METHODS: A double blind randomized cross over study was carried out to investigate the effect of an arteriolar dilator (diltiazem hydrochloride 180 mg/day orally) versus a venodilator (isosorbide dinitrate 30 mg/day orally) on digoxin kinetics (0.25 mg/day orally), after 10 days therapy in patients with heart failure due to ischemic heart disease. Also, the effect of these drugs on blood pressure, heart rate, renal functions and serum electrolytes, and their efficacy and tolerability in combination with digoxin were studied. This study was carried out in the Department of Medicine, Main Alexandria University Hospital, Alexandria, Egypt, during the period May 1999 through to May 2000. RESULTS: Diltiazem caused a significant increase in digoxin maximum serum concentration without significant change in time to reach maximum concentration and the apparent volume of distribution. The total digoxin clearance was significantly reduced and the elimination half life was prolonged. Subsequently the area under time-concentration curve and the steady-state digoxin level were increased, but were still within therapeutic margin. On the other hand isosorbide dinitrate significantly increased digoxin maximum serum concentration but without change in the other digoxin pharmacokinetic parameters. Isosorbide dinitrate, but not diltiazem, caused significant reduction in supine and standing blood pressure, while both drugs did not significantly alter pulse rate, renal functions, serum sodium potassium and electrocardiographic pattern. CONCLUSION: Patients who received diltiazem displayed a mean 51% increase in the area under the plasma concentration-time curve, 50% increase in mean steady state serum digoxin concentration, and 37% increase in peak serum digoxin concentration. While patients who received isosorbide dinitrate showed only a 15% increase in digoxin maximum serum concentration and no statistically significant change in mean steady state digoxin concentration or area under the plasma concentration-time curve. The elimination half life during the diltiazem phase was prolonged by 29% while there was no significant change with isosorbide dinitrate. Netiher diltiazem or isosorbide dinitrate significantly altered the time to reach maximum serum digoxin concentration. The addition of a vasodilator such as, diltiazem or isosorbid dinitrate to digoxin could significantly improve the symptoms and signs of heart failure compared to digoxin alone. They were well tolerated and without fear of electrolyte imbalance which potentiate digoxin toxicity.

Analysis of Variance↗
PubMed1985

Digoxin and nifedipine.

Many investigators have studied the potential interactions between calcium-channel antagonists and digoxin. Digoxin is usually well absorbed, and its excretion is dependent on renal mechanisms, primarily glomerular filtration. Several studies have reported a decrease in digoxin clearance and an increase of approximately 50% in digoxin levels when verapamil was added to digoxin therapy. Because renal digoxin clearance was decreased but no concomitant change in creatinine clearance was shown, the presumed major mechanism for decreased renal digoxin clearance is an alteration in renal tubular secretion of digoxin. Although an early report described a digoxin-nifedipine interaction, several subsequent studies have shown no significant changes in digoxin kinetics during nifedipine administration. Four studies found no significant decrease in creatinine clearance of digoxin during nifedipine administration. Thus significant changes in glomerular filtration are unlikely. Physiologic endpoints were measured by 2 groups describing a digoxin-nifedipine interaction and, although there was an increase in serum digoxin concentration, no changes were found in electrophysiologic correlates. Thus, if a digoxin-nifedipine interaction does exist, steady-state digoxin levels might increase from 24 to 45% when nifedipine therapy is added. Studies to date have involved small numbers of subjects with and without cardiac disease and have used different study protocols. Nonetheless, little evidence exists for any clinically significant increase in physiologic effects and no adverse effects have been found in patients receiving combined nifedipine and digoxin.

Absorption↗
PubMed1999

Pharmacokinetic interaction of sparfloxacin and digoxin.

Sparfloxacin, a broad-spectrum, oral fluoroquinolone antimicrobial agent, has a long elimination half-life that permits once-daily administration. Antibiotics may increase the oral bioavailability of digoxin, leading to increases in its plasma concentration. Since patients treated with sparfloxacin may be receiving concurrent treatment with digoxin, the possibility of an interaction between sparfloxacin and digoxin was examined in a double-masked, placebo-controlled, multiple-dose, two-way crossover study in 24 healthy male volunteers between 20 and 49 years of age. All subjects were given digoxin 0.3 mg once daily throughout the 20-day study. Sparfloxacin (or placebo) was given as a 400-mg loading dose on day 1, followed by single 200-mg daily doses for 9 days, with crossover to the alternate treatment on days 11 through 20. Plasma levels of digoxin were analyzed by validated radioimmunoassay, and plasma levels of sparfloxacin were analyzed by validated high-performance liquid chromatography. Concomitant administration of sparfloxacin and digoxin was generally well tolerated. Mean values for steady-state area under the concentration-time curve over 24 hours for the 2 treatments were virtually identical: 28.4 ng/h per mL(-1) for digoxin administered with placebo and 28.9 ng/h per mL(-1) for digoxin administered concomitantly with sparfloxacin. Mean steady-state maximum plasma concentrations were 3.91 and 3.59 ng/mL for digoxin with placebo and digoxin with sparfloxacin, respectively. Mean steady-state trough plasma digoxin concentrations for the 2 treatments were 0.87 and 0.89 ng/mL, respectively. Mean times to steady-state maximum plasma concentrations were identical at 0.89 hours for both treatments. Mean steady-state oral clearance was 10.6 L/h for digoxin alone and 10.4 L/h for digoxin with sparfloxacin. Thus administration of sparfloxacin in combination with digoxin did not alter the pharmacokinetics of digoxin in healthy male volunteers aged 20 to 49 years. Steady-state plasma sparfloxacin concentrations were consistent with those obtained in other multiple-dose phase I studies, suggesting that digoxin does not alter the steady-state pharmacokinetics of sparfloxacin.

Adult↗
PubMed2006

The new enzyme-linked immunosorbent digoxin assay on the ADVIA Integrated Modular System is virtually free from oleander interference.

Despite known toxicity of oleander, this product is used in herbal preparations. Oleander interferes with various digoxin immunoassays. It is possible that a person taking digoxin also may take oleander-containing herbal products, and digoxin immunoassays interfering with oleander cannot be used for therapeutic monitoring of digoxin. Recently, Bayer Diagnostics introduced a new enzyme-linked chemiluminescent immunosorbent digoxin assay for application on the ADVIA IMS System (ECLIA-digoxin). We studied potential interference of oleander with this new digoxin assay and found that this assay is virtually free from oleander interference. When aliquots of drug-free serum pools were supplemented with ethyl alcohol extract of oleander leaf or pure oleandrin standard, we observed significant apparent digoxin concentration when measured by the fluorescence polarization immunoassay (FPIA) but minimal digoxin-like immunoreactivity using the ECLIA digoxin assay. Because cross-reactivity should be studied in the presence of primary analyte, we prepared 2 serum pools using sera from patients receiving digoxin. Then aliquots of first digoxin pool were supplemented with oleandrin standard and aliquots of second digoxin pool with oleander extract. We observed significant increases in apparent digoxin concentration in the presence of both oleandrin and oleander extract using the FPIA. However, we observed no statistically significant change in digoxin concentration when ECLIA digoxin assay was used, indicating that this assay is virtually free from oleander interference.

Cardenolides↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Clinical pharmacokinetics of digoxin.

About 70 to 80% of an oral dose of digoxin is absorbed, mainly in the proximal part of the small intestine. The degree of binding to serum albumin is 20 to 30%. Digoxin is extensively distributed in the tissues, as reflected by the large volume of distribution. High concentrations are found in the heart and kidneys, but the skeletal muscles form the largest digoxin storage. The half-life of elimination in healthy persons varies between 26 and 45 hours. The main route of elimination is renal excretion of digoxin, which is closely correlated with the glomerular filtration rate. In addition, some tubular secretion and perhaps tubular reabsorption occurs. Nearly all of the digoxin in the urine is excreted unchanged, with a small part as active metabolites. The clinical significance of dihydrodigoxin as a metabolite remains to be resolved. About 25 to 28% of digoxin is eliminated by nonrenal routes. Biliary excretion may rise up to 30% of a given dose, but the enterohepatic cycle seems to be of minor importance. The pharmacodynamic effects of digoxin, including toxic symptoms, are correlated with the uptake of digoxin in the heart after a single dose and with the steady state serum digoxin concentration during maintenance therapy. Impaired kidney function is the most important condition with an influence on the pharmacokinetics of digoxin. In addition to the renal clearance of creatinine, the biovailability of the digoxin formulation used, the volume of distribution, the amount of extrarenal clearance, body weight and serum albumin concentration, are other factors which may modify the serum level of digoxin. Certain drug interactions may also occur during the absorptive phase. Exact prediction of serum digoxin concentrations by various dosage calculations has not succeeded. Since many factors may influence the sensitivity of the myocardium to digoxin, measurement of serum digoxin levels in only one, but a useful criterion, when making clinical decisions about adjustment of digoxin dosage.

Absorption↗
PubMed2002

Digoxin toxicity in Thai medical patients: clinical manifestations and an appropriate diagnostic serum level.

This study considers the clinical manifestations and risk factors of digoxin toxicity and establishes an appropriate cut-off serum level for the diagnosis of toxicity. A retrospectivestudy of 125 hospitalized patients whose serum digoxin was assayed in 1998 was conducted. Of the 125 subjects, 42 (33.6%) were classified as having definite digoxin toxicity, 9 (7.2%) were classified as having probable digoxin toxicity, and 74 (59.2%) were classified as non-toxicated. Of the patients with definite digoxin toxicity, 24 (57.1%) had cardiac manifestations, seven (16.7%) had non-cardiac manifestations, and 11 had manifestations of both types. The commonest manifestation was atrial fibrillation with block. Average daily doses of digoxin in the patients with definite digoxin toxicity and those without intoxication varied from 0.125 to 0.5 ng/ml. There was no significant statistical difference in digoxin dosage between those with and those without digoxin toxicity. Seven univariate factors of digoxin toxicity were examined: logistic regression analysis showed that, serum BUN and serum chloride were independent associated factors of digoxin toxicity: the finding suggests that renal impairment and volume contraction are strong determinants of digoxin toxicity. Mean (SD) serum digoxin levels among the patients with and without toxicity were 2.28 (1.3) and 1.05 (0.6) ng/ml respectively (p = 0.000). The best cut-off level determined by Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) analysis was 1.97 ng/ml. However, a low sensitivity and a high specificity make serum digoxin levels a diagnostic rather than a screening tool. The manifestations of digoxin toxicity among Thai inpatients are no different from those of other populations. The best cut-off level of serum digoxin for the diagnosis of toxicity is 2 ng/ml.

Analysis of Variance↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Opioid receptor agonists D-Ala-2-Me-Phe-4-Met-(O)-ol enkephalin and ethylketocyclazocine in the brain accentuate digoxin-induced arrhythmias.

OBJECTIVE: To examine the potential effects of two opioid receptor agonists in the brain on digoxin-induced cardiac arrhythmias and to explore cholinergic mechanisms in any potential effect on arrhythmias. METHODS AND RESULTS: Digoxin-induced arrhythmias were produced in guinea pigs (weighing between 280 and 350 g) that received digoxin 50 micrograms/kg intravenous bolus plus digoxin 500 micrograms/kg/h intravenously. Animals received D-Ala-2-Me-Phe-4-Met-(O)-ol enkephalin (FK 33,824) (50 or 100 micrograms/kg), ethylketocyclazocine (EKC) (50, 10 or 1 micrograms/kg) or saline (control) into the lateral cerebroventricle prior to digoxin. FK 33,824 produced significant (P less than 0.05) dose-dependent reductions in the threshold for digoxin-induced arrhythmias. The mean digoxin dosage at the development of fatal arrhythmias after the 100 micrograms/kg of FK 33,824 was 30% lower than the control group. EKC also produced significant (P less than 0.05) dose-dependent reductions in the threshold for digoxin-induced arrhythmias and the mean dose at development of fatal arrhythmias was 67% lower than the control group after 50 micrograms/kg of EKC. In the absence of digoxin, the highest dosages of each of these opioids did not produce arrhythmias. Changes in blood pressure and heart rate were unlikely explanations for the observed actions of these opioids because D-Ala-2-Me-Phe-4-Met-(O)-ol enkephalin accentuated the increase in blood pressure that accompanied digoxin while EKC reduced the blood pressure response to digoxin and neither altered the heart rate response to digoxin. In the control group, fatal digoxin-induced arrhythmias were ventricular tachyarrhythmias in two-thirds of cases and complete heart block in the remainder. These opioids accentuated the development of complete heart block. The role of the cholinergic system was explored for only EKC because both opioids produce similar effects on arrhythmias, using atropine sulphate which crosses the blood brain-barrier and atropine methylnitrate which does not enter the central nervous system. Atropine sulphate, but not atropine methylnitrate, slightly blunted but did not reverse the action of EKC. CONCLUSIONS: These data indicate that: two opioids in the brain--D-Ala-2-Me-Phe-4-Met-(O)-ol enkephalin and EKC--alter the threshold for development of digoxin-induced arrhythmias, specifically accentuating development of complete heart block produced by digoxin; and cholinergic mechanisms play only a small role in modulating the action of EKC on digoxin-induced bradyarrhythmias.

Animals↗
PubMed2003

Intravenously administered digoxin in patients with acute atrial fibrillation: a population pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic analysis based on the Digitalis in Acute Atrial Fibrillation trial.

OBJECTIVE: Atrial fibrillation is commonly treated with intravenously administered digoxin. The main objective of this study was to investigate the relationship between plasma concentration of digoxin and heart rate. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Plasma concentrations of digoxin were analysed in 105 patients allocated to digoxin therapy in the Digitalis in Acute Atrial Fibrillation (DAAF) trial. A pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) model for the relationship among digoxin dose, plasma concentration and heart rate in patients remaining in atrial fibrillation was constructed using non-linear, mixed-effect modelling. One hundred and twenty-two placebo-treated patients were included as a control group. In 56 patients, one late sample at 16 h after the first dose of digoxin was obtained while in 49 patients an early sample at 0.25-0.5 h and a late sample 16 h after the first dose were obtained. Heart rate was measured at 0, 2, 6, 12 and 16 h after inclusion, with data from 98, 89, 67, 56 and 53 patients available at each time point, respectively. RESULTS: A two-compartment model best described the time course of digoxin concentrations in plasma. Digoxin and creatinine clearance correlated strongly and mean plasma concentration of digoxin at 16 h was within recommended levels (1.6+/-1.0 nM). The decrease in heart rate in placebo-treated patients was, on average, 0.5 beats/min (bpm) per hour. In patients on digoxin, a linear relationship between the estimated digoxin concentration at the effect site and the drop-in heart rate was found. The half-life for the digoxin distribution to the effect compartment was approximately 3.8 h. The degree of reduction was related to the initial heart rate and patients with higher heart rate had a more pronounced decrease. The model predicted that a digoxin concentration of 1 nM at the effect site reduces heart rate by 9.4%. CONCLUSION: A PK/PD model for the relationship between the plasma concentration of digoxin, the estimated concentration at the effect site and the reduction in heart rate during atrial fibrillation could be defined using a population pharmacokinetic approach. Our data indicate that a more aggressive dosing regimen of digoxin may be more effective in terms of heart rate reduction.

Acute Disease↗
PubMed1996

A new interference in some digoxin assays: anti-murine heterophilic antibodies.

BACKGROUND: We describe a patient with cirrhotic liver disease and atrial fibrillation who was treated with spironolactone and digoxin. He was hospitalized because of an incidental finding of a high serum digoxin level (4.2 micrograms/L), but he remained asymptomatic without emerging arrhythmias. Despite discontinuation of both drugs, his serum digoxin level persisted at or above 3.0 micrograms/L for approximately 5 weeks, drawing into question the accuracy of the digoxin assay. METHODS: Additional digoxin methods gave lower, discrepant results, providing evidence of an assay interference, and several possible sources of digoxin false positivity were evaluated. This included assessment of the contribution of digoxin-like immunoreactive factor (DLIF), digoxin metabolites, and spironolactone. Because the routine digoxin assay used a monoclonal antibody, we also tested for another hypothetical interference: human heterophilic ("anti-mouse") antibodies. RESULTS: We found no contribution from DLIF, digoxin antibodies, or spironolactone to the apparent digoxin results. However, the use of protein A to complex and selectively remove immunoglobulin G molecules markedly lowered the apparent digoxin value, as did the less specific process of ultrafiltration. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest a previously unreported cause of digoxin false positivity: heterophilic antibodies, which have been reported to bind murine monoclonal antibodies in other assays. Because newer digoxin assays now use murine monoclonal antibodies, the possible presence of heterophilic, anti-mouse antibodies should now be considered in the interpretation of a high digoxin level.

Anti-Arrhythmia Agents↗
PubMed1999

Longitudinal assessment of a P-glycoprotein-mediated drug interaction of valspodar on digoxin.

OBJECTIVES: Valspodar is a P-glycoprotein modulator currently under development as a multidrug resistance reversal agent in clinical oncology. A multiple-dose drug interaction study was performed to assess the influence of valspodar on digoxin, a substrate for P-glycoprotein. METHODS: Twelve healthy volunteers received an oral digoxin loading dose of 1 mg on day 1, followed by 0.125 mg once daily to day 11. On day 7, a single oral 400-mg dose of valspodar was given, followed by a regimen of 200 mg twice daily from days 8 to 11. Serial blood samples and urine collections were obtained on days 6, 7, and 11 for digoxin pharmacokinetics and on days 7 and 11 for valspodar pharmacokinetics. On these days, blood pressure, pulse rate, and electrocardiograms were recorded at multiple time points. RESULTS: Coadministration of single-dose valspodar with steady-state digoxin on day 7 yielded an average 76% increase in digoxin AUC and a 62% decrease in digoxin renal clearance (both P = .0001). After a 5-day coadministration period, digoxin AUC increased by an average 211% and apparent total body clearance was decreased by 67% (day 11) compared with steady-state administration of digoxin alone (day 6). Contributing to the change in total body clearance were decreases in both renal clearance (73%) and apparent nonrenal clearance (58%). Both drugs were well tolerated throughout the study. There was no clinically relevant change in the effect of digoxin on vital signs or electrocardiographic parameters when administered with single- or multiple-dose valspodar compared with administration alone in volunteers with healthy cardiovascular systems. CONCLUSIONS: Coadministration of oral valspodar and oral digoxin resulted in a twofold to threefold increase in digoxin systemic exposure. On the basis of these data in healthy volunteers, an initial digoxin dose reduction of 50% would appear to be appropriate when beginning oral valspodar treatment. Throughout the period of coadministration, patients should be carefully monitored for clinical signs of digoxin toxicity in conjunction with digoxin therapeutic drug monitoring. Together, these should serve as the basis for individualized digoxin dose titration.

ATP Binding Cassette Transporter, Subfamily B, Mem↗
PubMed2004

Dose-dependent hemodynamic effect of digoxin therapy in severe verapamil toxicity.

UNLABELLED: Calcium chloride (CaCl(2)) alone is an ineffective antidote in severe calcium channel antagonist overdoses. Digoxin has been evaluated as a therapy to increase the effectiveness of calcium in severe calcium channel antagonist overdoses. OBJECTIVE: To determine if there is a dose-dependent hemodynamic effect of digoxin in the setting of severe verapamil toxicity treated with high-dose CaCl(2). METHODS: Eight dogs were instrumented to measure systolic and diastolic blood pressure, cardiac output, pulmonary artery pressures, and left ventricular pressures. Verapamil toxicity (50% decrease in mean arterial pressure) was induced with verapamil 6 mg/kg/hr and maintained for 30 minutes by titrating the verapamil rate. Following verapamil toxicity, each dog received one dose of digoxin equivalent to 0, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 6, or 8 times the loading dose of digoxin (0.009 mg/kg). The verapamil rate was changed to 4 mg/kg/hr and continued for the next five hours. CaCl(2) boluses were given (0.5 g immediately following verapamil toxicity and 1 g at one, two, and three hours). Measurements were compared with the loading dose of digoxin using linear regression analysis. RESULTS: Digoxin resulted in a dose-dependent increase in systolic blood pressure at 4 hours (10.23 mm Hg/loading dose of digoxin, 95% CI = 2.74 to 17.73), 4 hours, 15 minutes (13.9 mm Hg/loading dose of digoxin, 95% CI = 8.75 to 19.01), and 5 hours (17.04 mm Hg/loading dose of digoxin, 95% CI = 1.76 to 32.32). Digoxin resulted in a dose-dependent increase in maximal ventricular pressure at the end of hour 3 (8.55 mm Hg/loading dose of digoxin, 95% CI = 3.41 to 13.69), 3 hours, 15 minutes (11.81 mm Hg/loading dose of digoxin, 95% CI = 4.89 to 18.73), hour 4 (8.26 mm Hg/loading dose of digoxin, 95% CI = 1.03 to 15.48), and 4 hours, 15 minutes (9.74 mm Hg/loading dose of digoxin, 95% CI = 4.47 to 15.00). The authors were unable to detect a dose-dependent increase in other parameters, including diastolic relaxation (diastolic change in pressure over time) and time to onset of death. No ventricular arrhythmias developed in any dogs. CONCLUSIONS: There is a dose-dependent effect of digoxin on systolic blood pressure and maximal ventricular pressure in the setting of severe verapamil toxicity treated with high-dose CaCl(2).

Animals↗
PubMed1975

Plasma and tissue digoxin concentrations in patients undergoing cardiopulmonary bypass.

Plasma myocardial, and skeletal muscle digoxin concentrations were measured in 32 patients undergoing cardiopulmonary bypass who were on long-term treatment with digoxin. The patients were divided into 4 groups according to the daily digoxin dose and the interval between discontinuation of the drug and operation. Before bypass, the mean digoxin concentrations were 1.58 nmol/l (1.24 ng/ml) in plasma 65.2 nmol/kg (50.9 ng/g) in the atria, 121.4 nmol/kg (94.98 ng/g) in 11 papillary muscles, and 16.6 nmol/kg (13.0 ng/g) in skeletal muscle. Mean atrial digoxin concentrations were significantly lower tham mean papillary muscle concentrations in 11 patients. Ratios of plasma of myocardial or skeletal muscle digoxin concentrations were very variable. Generally digoxin concentrations were higher in patients on the larger digoxin dose and with the shorter discontinuation time before surgery. These differences attained significance only with plasma digoxin concentrations. There was a slight fall in plasma digoxin concentration during cardiopulmonary bypass but no significant differences were observed between plasma, atrial, or skeletal muscle digoxin concentrations before and at the end of bypass. No clear relation was seen between plasma or atrial digoxin concentrations and postoperative cardiotoxicity. Stopping digoxin 48 hours before operation appeared to account for pre- or post-bypass plasma digoxin concentrations of less than 1.0 nmol/l (0.8 ng/ml) in most of the instances encountered, whereas the 3 patients who developed pulsus bigeminus postoperatively had received 0.5 mg digoxin only 24 hours before operation.

Adult↗
PubMed1978

Relationship between plasma concentration and dose of digoxin in patients with and without renal impairment.

The purpose of this study was to determine if there is a linear relationship between oral doses of digoxin and various measurements of steady-state digoxin plasma concentration and urinary excretion in patients with wide range of renal function. Ten patients (mean age 58 years) with creatinine clearances greater than 50 ml/min/1.73 m2 BSA (mean creatinine clearance 80 ml/min/1.73 m2 BSA) and nine patients mean age 61 years) with creatinine clearances less than 50 ml/min/1.73 m2 BSA (mean creatinine clearance 20 ml/min/1.73 m2 BSA) were given digoxin tablets orally at two or three different dose levels (dose range 0.0313--0.5 mg/day). After a dosing period equal to at least five half-lives, three to four consecutive daily digoxin plasma concentrations were determined. Plasma concentrations and urinary digoxin excretion were measured during one 24-hour dosing interval at each dose level. Digoxin plasma and urine concentrations were determined in triplicate using radioimmunoassay. Individual patient plots provided evidence of linearity for: digoxin 24-hour steady-state plasma concentration vs dose; digoxin 24-hour cumulative urinary excretion versus dose; and area under the digoxin plasma concentration-time curve during a 24-hour dosing interval vs dose. Absolute values for these various parameters indicated substantial interpatient variation probably due to patient differences in both digoxin absorption and digoxin total body clearance. These results indicate that there is a linear relationship between digoxin plasma concentration and dose in patients with normal and decreased renal function. This linearity is support for dose-independent pharmacokinetics of digoxin in man. We conclude from these data that a change in digoxin dose should result in a proportional change in digoxin plasma concentration over the dose range examined.

Administration, Oral↗