Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Current Procedural Terminology”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 379 records · Page 21Linked to original sources
PubMedDate not supplied

Follow the codes.

Explore the source record for details and available documents.

Current Procedural Terminology↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Obtaining advance beneficiary notices for Medicare physician providers.

Medicare has established medical necessity rules that define the medical conditions that make beneficiaries eligible for particular services. These rules are codified in local medical review policies (LMRPs) that are established by Medicare claims payment contractors. If a beneficiary's provider does not inform the patient that a service may not be covered, the provider cannot subsequently bill the beneficiary for the service if it is denied. This article discusses the application of these policies. It illustrates the circumstances in which advance beneficiary notices (ABN) are required to ensure that patients have been notified that services rendered will not be covered by Medicare and will become their financial responsibility. The author also presents special applications of the ABN regulations as they apply to the EMTALA rules, anti-kickback, and other statutes. Samples of the official ABN forms are illustrated.

Aged↗
PubMed2003

Bone up on fractures.

Explore the source record for details and available documents.

Current Procedural Terminology↗
PubMed2003

How to fight bundling.

Explore the source record for details and available documents.

Current Procedural Terminology↗
PubMed2003

Coding controversy.

Explore the source record for details and available documents.

Current Procedural Terminology↗
PubMed2003

Validation of data collection for the HEDIS performance measure on chlamydia screening in an MCO.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the validity of calculating the chlamydia Health Plan Employer Data and Information Set (HEDIS) measure using administrative data available in a mixed-model managed care organization (MCO). STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. METHODS: A review of International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision (ICD-9), Current Procedural Termin-ology (CPT), Healthcare Common Procedure Coding System (HCPCS), and National Drug Code codes and electronic laboratory files in 1998 and a medical chart review to validate sexual activity and chlamydia testing codes specified by the National Committee for Quality Assurance (NCQA) in 1999 for the chlamydia HEDIS 2000 measure. RESULTS: Fewer than 25% of female enrollees with laboratory evidence of a chlamydia test had a CPT code for chlamydia testing as specified by the NCQA. Non-pathogen-specific test codes instead of NCQA-specified codes were used in 1998 to code chlamydia tests. By incorporating electronic laboratory data into the automated claims-generating process, all chlamydia tests performed at staff-model clinics were coded. Use of pharmacy dispensing data to identify contraceptive prescriptions increased the proportion of enrollees classified as sexually active by 4% to 5% vs documentation of sexual activity using ICD-9, CPT, and HCPCS codes only. CONCLUSIONS: The MCO quality assurance specialists examining chlamydia testing rates under HEDIS may want to evaluate chlamydia testing coding practices in their MCOs to determine whether simple changes in coding practices may present a more accurate picture of actual testing practices. The proportion of female enrollees classified as sexually active using different data available in the staff and network models varied only slightly.

Adolescent↗