Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “practice”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 361 records · Page 20Linked to original sources

Advanced practice nurses: starting an independent practice.

Independent or private practice is the delivery of nursing services provided by nurses over which nurses have full control. With a changing healthcare system, nurses are in a prime position to negotiate the delivery of appropriate, acceptable, and cost-effective health care as independent practitioners. This article addresses the mission and goals of independent practice, community need, business structure of the practice, housing the practice, legal considerations, financing the practice, marketing issues, clientele, record keeping, and reimbursement.

Humans↗

Registered nurse and registered practical nurse evaluations of their hospital practice environments and their responses to these environments.

In 2003, over 13,000 Ontario nurses were surveyed to explore how they evaluated their hospital work environments and their responses to these practice environments. The purpose of this paper is to describe and compare these nurses' evaluations and responses. Sixty-five percent of nurses who were mailed surveys completed and returned a survey. Significant differences were found between registered nurse and registered practical nurse characteristics such as mean age, full-time employment rates, mean years of nursing experience and proportion enrolled in university or college educational programs. Both groups reported weak professional practice environments; however, there were some significant differences between the evaluations by registered nurses and those of registered practical nurses. Although both groups reported weak job satisfaction and moderate levels of burnout, there were significan differences in other responses. Study findings have implications for managing and leading nurses and for strengthening human resources practices.

Acute Disease↗

Clinical practice guidelines in general practice: a national survey of recall, attitudes and impact.

OBJECTIVE: To determine Australian general practitioners' (GPs') views about and recall of clinical practice guidelines. DESIGN: Self-administered questionnaire survey. SUBJECTS: Randomly selected Australian GPs. RESULTS: 286 of 373 GPs returned questionnaires (77% response rate). GPs' recall of each of nine guidelines ranged from 52% to 94%; 49% considered that their practice had changed as a result of a guideline. While 92% of respondents agreed that guidelines were "good educational tools", 85% indicated that guidelines were "developed by experts who don't understand general practice". Factors most frequently identified as important in deciding whether to follow the guideline recommendations were whether the guideline was based on evidence and credible endorsement. CONCLUSIONS: Australian GPs have positive views about the purpose of clinical practice guidelines and an evidence-based approach to guidelines development. However, respondents rating of the perceived impact of available guidelines in everyday practice was low. The dissemination of specific guidelines is patchy and there is little evidence of systematic implementation.

Adult↗

The scope of TMD/orofacial pain (head and neck pain management) in contemporary dental practice. Dental Practice Act Committee of the American Academy of Orofacial Pain.

The Dental Practice Act Committee of the American Academy of Orofacial Pain was convened in 1995 for the purpose of studying the scope of temporomandibular disorders (TMD)/orofacial pain and dental practice acts. The committee concluded that the scope of clinical practice of TMD/orofacial pain is expanding beyond the teeth and oral cavity to include the diagnosis and treatment of disorders affecting the entire head and neck. The expansion of clinical practice is consistent with historical precedent in dentistry and within the scope of current dental practice acts. The present report represents the position of the American Academy of Orofacial Pain.

Facial Pain↗

Best practice treatment algorithm for primary open-angle glaucoma: implications for U.S. ophthalmology practice.

The objective of this study was to develop a "best-practice" treatment algorithm for the management of primary open-angle glaucoma in patients receiving initial medical therapy, to serve as a consideration for future ophthalmology practice. For comparison, a baseline, "common-practice" treatment algorithm was also created that reflects current ophthalmology practice patterns. Survey instruments were developed based on a comprehensive review of relevant literature, along with input from a general ophthalmologist. A panel of eight ophthalmologists subspecialized in glaucoma management was surveyed. Consensus was achieved using a modified Delphi technique. A comparison of common- and best-practice treatment algorithms suggests that in contrast with expert opinion, nonselective beta blockers are currently used more often, and alpha-2 agonists less often, as first-line therapy for the treatment of primary open-angle glaucoma.

Adrenergic alpha-Agonists↗

Practice organization before and after the new contract: a survey of general practices in Sheffield.

In order to assess the effects of the new contract on practice organization, all general practices in Sheffield were surveyed just before the new contract came into effect in April 1990, and again one year later. Of the 120 practices, 57% responded in 1990 and 61% in 1991, with 47% responding in both years. There were significant increases in the mean number of clinics and employed staff for the practices responding to both questionnaires and in the proportion of these practices which had a computer. These changes represent a response to the incentives and stated aims of the new contract.

Appointments and Schedules↗

Practical clinical applications of sports dentistry in private practice.

Preparing a practice to become "trauma-ready" involves more than educating the dentist and the staff in the proper management of dentofacial trauma. All members of the office should understand their roles in preventing and treating trauma. They must be willing to provide care after hours when called upon to do so. Dentists who want to be more involved might wish to volunteer their services as sports dentists for local school or recreational league teams. The dentist who is conscious of his or her patients who are at risk for sports-related trauma will also find others in the practice who might benefit from many of the same protective devices that are being constructed for athletes. These include children involved in higher-risk activities, developmentally disabled patients, patients undergoing general anesthesia, and others. Being trauma-ready may open up several rewarding activities for the practice because of the many spin-off applications. The trauma-ready practice must also be cognizant of the some-times perplexing legal and insurance issues with regard to preventing and treating sport-related injuries. In addition to lowering the risk exposure to the practice, the dentist can help ensure the maximum third-party benefits for the patient.

Humans↗

HIV infection and Scottish general practice: workload and current practice.

To estimate the effect of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection on general practice, a postal survey was undertaken of one in three of all principals in Scotland. Of the 834 general practitioners who responded (78% response rate), 31% were working in practices with patients known to be infected with HIV. The estimated prevalence of known HIV infection in general practice was 19 per 100,000 population, and the estimated annual consultation rate for HIV related problems (including consultations by the 'worried well') was seven per 1000 population. Both statistics showed considerable variation between health boards, with peaks in Lothian and Tayside. Few practices had drawn up policies relevant to HIV infection, and the use of procedures for controlling infection was variable. Policies about HIV and for infection control tended to be more common in areas where the prevalence of HIV infection was higher. Most respondents were offering both opportunistic health education and counselling about HIV infection, especially to patients at high risk. Although general practitioners are responding positively to the increasing demands of HIV infection, there is an urgent need for policies, both national and local, to guide specific aspects of practice.

Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome↗

Clinical experience of medical students in model family practices and private family practices.

The clinical experience of 21 Duke medical students during their family medicine clerkship is analyzed to compare experience in model family practices with that in private family practices. In model practices where 50 percent of the time involved patient care, students saw an average of 41 different patients for 45 encounters and 73 problem contacts during the month. In private practices with 100 percent time devoted to patient care, students saw 140 patients for 193 encounters and 346 problem contacts during the month. Most patients were seen in the physician office in both sites (89.0 percent model and 70.4 percent private), but fewer were seen as hospital inpatients in the model than in the private practices (6.3 vs 25.7 percent). The types of patient problems were alike, with the same 11 problems ranking in the top 15 most frequently seen in the two locations. The major difference in experience relates to the larger volume of patients and problems encountered in the private than in the model sites.

Clinical Clerkship↗

[Patients of private practice physicians--selected results of a survey in general practice offices].

The structural changes in outpatient medical care in the new Federal Laender were characterised by the fact that doctors now established their own medical practice whereas previously they had been part of a state-controlled and state-organised system of medical centres for outpatient treatment. The aim of the present study consisted in analysing the opinions of patients on these changes in ambulatory medical care from state control to a physician in own medical practice. The standardised questionnaire used in this study contained questions on the conditions of organisation within the practice, e.g. waiting period, consultation period, home visit and accessibility of the doctor. Furthermore the patients were asked for important criteria of medical care by a family doctor. Selected results of this inquiry of patients are compared to a study realised in 1988/89 under conditions of the former public health system of the GDR. Comparison of both studies results in significant differences. In a practice of a consulting-room practitioner the waiting period is shorter, the accessibility of the doctor is better and the time of consultations is positively changed compared to the former public health system. In 1992 about 94% of patients considered the general practitioner in his own practice as their family doctor, in 1988/89 under the conditions of the public health system only 66% of patients did so. These differences are due to the higher degree of realisation of the criteria of medical care by a family doctor.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Adult↗

Recommendations for using smallpox vaccine in a pre-event vaccination program. Supplemental recommendations of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) and the Healthcare Infection Control Practices Advisory Committee (HICPAC).

This report supplements the 2001 statement by the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) (CDC. Vaccinia [smallpox] vaccine: recommendations of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices [ACIP], 2001. MMWR 2001;50[No. RR-10]:1-25). This supplemental report provides recommendations for using smallpox vaccine in the pre-event vaccination program in the United States. To facilitate preparedness and response, smallpox vaccination is recommended for persons designated by public health authorities to conduct investigation and follow-up of initial smallpox cases that might necessitate direct patient contact. ACIP recommends that each state and territory establish and maintain > or = 1 smallpox response team. ACIP and the Healthcare Infection Control Practices Advisory Committee (HICPAC) recommend that each acute-care hospital identify health-care workers who can be vaccinated and trained to provide direct medical care for the first smallpox patients requiring hospital admission and to evaluate and manage patients who are suspected as having smallpox. When feasible, the first-stage vaccination program should include previously vaccinated health-care personnel to decrease the potential for adverse events. Additionally persons administering smallpox vaccine in this pre-event vaccination program should be vaccinated. Smallpox vaccine is administered by using the multiple-puncture technique with a bifurcated needle, packaged with the vaccine and diluent. According to the product labeling, 2-3 punctures are recommended for primary vaccination and 15 punctures for revaccination. A trace of blood should appear at the vaccination site after 15-20 seconds; if no trace of blood is visible, an additional 3 insertions should be made by using the same bifurcated needle without reinserting the needle into the vaccine vial. If no evidence of vaccine take is apparent after 7 days, the person can be vaccinated again. Optimal infection-control practices and appropriate site care should prevent transmission of vaccinia virus from vaccinated health-care workers to patients. Health-care personnel providing direct patient care should keep their vaccination sites covered with gauze in combination with a semipermeable membrane dressing to absorb exudates and to provide a barrier for containment of vaccinia virus to minimize the risk of transmission; the dressing should also be covered by a layer of clothing. Dressings used to cover the site should be changed frequently to prevent accumulation of exudates and consequent maceration. The most critical measure in preventing contact transmission is consistent hand hygiene. Hospitals should designate staff to assess dressings for all vaccinated health-care workers. When feasible, staff responsible for dressing changes for smallpox health-care teams should be vaccinated, all persons handling dressings should observe contact precautions. Administrative leave is not required routinely for newly vaccinated health-care personnel unless they are physically unable to work as a result of systemic signs and symptoms of illness; have extensive skin lesions that cannot be adequately covered or if they are unable to adhere to the recommended infection-control precautions. Persons outside the patient-care setting can keep their vaccination sites covered with a porous dressing hand hygiene remains key to preventing inadvertent inoculation. FDA has recommended that recipients of smallpox vaccine be deferred from donating blood for 21 days or until the scab has separated. Contacts of vaccinees, who have inadvertently contracted vaccinia, also should be deferred from donating blood for 14 days after complete resolution of their complication. In the pre-event vaccination program, smallpox vaccination is contraindicated for persons with a history or presence of eczema or atopic dermatitis; who have other acute, chronic, or exfoliative skin conditions; who have conditions associated with immunosuppression; are aged < 1 year; who have a serious allergy to any component of the vaccine; or who are pregnant or breastfeeding. ACIP does not recommend smallpox vaccination for children and adolescents aged < 18 years during the pre-event vaccination program. Pre-event vaccination also is contraindicated among persons with household contacts who have a history or presence of eczema or atopic dermatitis; who have other acute, chronic, or exfoliative skin conditions; who have conditions associated with immunosuppression; or who are pregnant. For purposes of screening for contraindications for pre-event vaccination, household contacts include persons with prolonged intimate contact (e.g., sexual contacts) with the potential vaccinee and others who might have direct contact with the vaccination site. Persons with inflammatory eye disease might be at increased risk for inadvertent inoculation as a result of touching or rubbing the eye. Therefore, deferring vaccination is prudent for persons with inflammatory eye diseases requiring steroid treatment until the condition resolves and the course of therapy is complete. Eczema vaccinatum, a serious form of disseminated vaccinia infection, can occur among persons with atopic dermatitis and other dermatologic conditions. Potential vaccinees should be queried regarding the diagnosis of atopic dermatitis or eczema in themselves or any member of their household, or regarding the presence of chronic or recurrent rashes consistent with these diagnoses. Persons reporting such a rash in themselves or household members should not be vaccinated, unless a health-care provider determines that the rash is not eczema or atopic dermatitis. Before vaccination, women of childbearing age should be asked if they are pregnant or intend to become pregnant during the next 4 weeks; women who respond positively should not be vaccinated. Any woman who thinks she might be pregnant or who wants additional assurance that she is not pregnant should perform a urine pregnancy test on the day scheduled for vaccination. If a pregnant woman is inadvertently vaccinated or if she becomes pregnant within 4 weeks after smallpox vaccination, she should be counseled regarding concerns for the fetus. Vaccination during pregnancy should not ordinarily be a reason to terminate pregnancy. CDC has established a pregnancy registry to prospectively follow the outcome of such pregnancies and facilitate the investigation of any adverse pregnancy outcome among pregnant women who were inadvertently vaccinated. For enrollment in the registry, contact CDC at 404-639-8253. Smallpox vaccine should not be administered to persons with human immunodeficiency virus infection (HIV) or acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS) as part of a pre-event program because of their increased risk for progressive vaccinia. HIV testing is recommended for persons who have any history of a risk factor for HIV infection or for anyone who is concerned that he or she might have HIV infection. HIV testing should be available in a confidential or anonymous setting, in accordance with local laws and regulations, with results communicated to the potential vaccinee before the planned date of vaccination. Smallpox vaccine can be administered simultaneously with any inactivated vaccine. With the exception of varicella vaccine, smallpox vaccine can be administered simultaneously with other live-virus vaccines. To avoid confusion in ascertaining which vaccine might have caused postvaccination skin lesions or other adverse events, varicella vaccine and smallpox vaccine should be administered >4 weeks apart. Health-care workers scheduled to receive an annual purified protein derivative (PPD) skin test for tuberculosis screening should not receive the skin test until >1 month after smallpox vaccination. Persons with progressive vaccinia, eczema vaccinatum, and severe generalized vaccinia or inadvertent inoculation might benefit from therapy with VIG or cidofovir, although the latter has not been approved by FDA for this indication. Suspected cases of these illnesses or other severe adverse events after smallpox vaccination should be reported immediately to state health departments. VIG and cidofovir are available from CDC under Investigational New Drug protocols. Clinically severe adverse events after smallpox vaccination should be reported to the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System. Reports can be made online at https://secure.vaers.org/VaersDataEntryintro.htm, or by postage-paid form, which is available by calling 800-822-7967 (toll-free). ACIP will review these recommendations periodically as new information becomes available related to smallpox disease, smallpox vaccines, the risk of smallpox attack, smallpox vaccine adverse events, and the experience gained as recent recommendations are implemented. Revised recommendations will be developed as needed.

Bioterrorism↗

Natural history of asymptomatic gallstones in family practice office practices.

BACKGROUND: Improved access to less invasive testing has resulted in more Americans being diagnosed with asymptomatic gallstones. The family physician has had to rely on community-based or referral patient studies to advise their office-based patients about treatment options. OBJECTIVE: To understand the natural history of asymptomatic gallstones discovered through a routine patient care process in a rural, office-based research network of 9 family physician practices. PARTICIPANTS AND METHODS: Nine family physician practices agreed to comb their records for medical records of patients found to have asymptomatic gallstones during their routine primary care practice. Medical records were then reviewed annually for 5 years for evidence of gallstone-related problems Results were compared with previous English-language literature studies. RESULTS: Asymptomatic gallstones were found in 32 patients (19 women [59%] and 13 men [41%] with an average age of 59.5 years). Symptoms developed in 8 patients (25%) after an average latency period of 3 years 5 months. Seven patients underwent cholecystectomy; there was no gallstone-related mortality in this group. One patient who developed a ruptured gallbladder required an emergency procedure. CONCLUSIONS: Routine office practice is detecting only a small percentage of the asymptomatic gallstones expected by community-based screening studies. While more of these patients became symptomatic than in general population studies, most patients with asymptomatic gallstones required no treatment. Those patients in family practice offices who are serendipitously found to have gallstones can generally be followed up conservatively.

Aged↗

Physician communities of practice: where learning and practice are inseparable.

Physicians interact with peers and mentors to frame issues, brainstorm, validate and share information, make decisions, and create management protocols, all of which contribute to learning in practice. It is likely that working together in this way creates the best environment for learning that enhances professional practice and professional judgment. So convincing are the arguments for this view that management practices already are changing to foster the integration of learning and practice. This article describes a program of research that is planned to assess the effectiveness of information and communication technologies that purport to support and enhance learning in practice.

Canada↗

A community practice model for community psychologists and some examples of the application of community practice skills from the Partnerships for Success initiative in Ohio.

This paper provides an opportunity to consider the concept of community practice from the vantage point of community psychology. The author argues that community psychology has significant potential to change organizations, communities, and other settings to benefit setting occupants. However, it is the author's contention that the full realization of this potential is contingent upon an organized effort to engage in formal community practice. The author defines community practice in terms of four skill sets related to mobilization, planning, implementation, and evaluation. The author also describes settings that might support community practice and discusses implications for training and the field of community psychology in general. Finally, the author illustrates several community practice skills and roles in the context of a local community-based initiative in Ohio called Partnerships for Success.

Evidence-Based Medicine↗

A nursing faculty practice for the severely mentally ill: merging practice with research.

This Faculty Practice developed in response to increasing medical complexity among severely mentally ill adults in community programs. It represents collaboration between an academic nursing program and Progress Foundation, a residential care provider in San Francisco for the severely mentally ill (SMI). Over ten years, the practice and research agenda have evolved together, through a commitment to mutual collaboration by clinicians and researchers from the University of California San Francisco (UCSF) School of Nursing, and the mental health community. Initial efforts at research focused on description of clients and practice. Research efforts have broadened and evolve to include an on-going clinical trial that tests the value of adding active health promotion to primary care. Factors contributing to success included trust among research and clinical faculty and community partners, use of clinical data in the service of practice and education, and relative freedom from fiscal administration. The merging of practice and research increases visibility of nursing contributions and will allow testing of models for care.

Adult↗

Effects of a clinical-practice guideline and practice-based education on detection and outcome of depression in primary care: Hampshire Depression Project randomised controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Depression is a major individual and public-health burden throughout the world and is managed mainly in primary care. The most effective strategy to reduce this burden has been believed to be education of primary-care practitioners. We tested this assumption by assessing the effectiveness of an educational programme based on a clinical-practice guideline in improving the recognition and outcome of primary-care depression. METHODS: We carried out a randomised controlled trial in a representative sample of 60 primary-care practices (26% of the total) in an English health district. Education was delivered to practice teams and quality tested by feedback from participants and expert raters. The primary endpoints were recognition of depression, defined by the hospital anxiety and depression (HAD) scale, and clinical improvement. Analysis was by intention to treat. FINDINGS: The education was well received by participants, 80% of whom thought it would change their management of patients with depression. 21409 patients were screened, of whom 4192 were classified as depressed by the HAD scale. The sensitivity of physicians to depressive symptoms was 39% in the intervention group and 36% in the control group after education (odds ratio 1.2 [95% CI 0.88-1.61]). The outcome of depressed patients as a whole at 6 weeks or 6 months after the assessment did not significantly improve. INTERPRETATION: Although well received, this in-practice programme, which was designed to convey the current consensus on best practice for the care of depression, did not deliver improvements in recognition of or recovery from depression.

Antidepressive Agents, Tricyclic↗

Practice-knowledge-attitudes-practice: an explorative study of information in primary care.

Contemporary information programmes for health staff fail to give thorough consideration to the influence of situational factors on information transfer within health institutions. To study information transfer in Swedish primary care health centres, we have therefore used the participant observation method, to explore the influences of practice on knowledge and attitude formation, in turn giving rise to new practice. Management of hyperlipidaemia was used as an example. Our study suggests that the practice generates new information, which is added to or counteracts the acquisition and use of already existing information and is subsequently used in practice. Ongoing discussions between staff members give an opportunity to share practice experiences. Profession, professional hierarchy and gender are some of the factors influencing the use of information in this context. To improve the effectiveness of information programmes these factors and the professional roles of the health staff should be taken into consideration.

Clinical Competence↗

Lay injection practices among migrant farmworkers in the age of AIDS: evolution of a biomedical folk practice.

The practice of injecting vitamins and antibiotics by lay people is common among Hispanic migrant farmworkers in the U.S.A. This practice has recent roots in the Latin American cultures from which these farmworkers originate, but it presents a public health concern in its new context because of the high prevalence of HIV infection among this disenfrachised population. Reasons for use of lay injections include cultural beliefs about the superiority of injections over oral forms of medications, perceived irrelevance of a professional diagnostician in prescribing empirical treatment, and a multitude of barriers to access to Western medicine. Although HIV educational materials directed at migrant farmworkers do not address the issue of sharing needles for these types of injections, some farmworkers indicated they had already modified their injection techniques in response to simple directives from physicians in their home country. In contrast to other folk treatment practices that have been resistant to change mediated solely through the provision of information, lay injection is such a new development that considerable experimentation and incorporation of new knowledge are still actively shaping its use. In this process, physicians are seen as legitimate sources of information about the use of Western pharmaceuticals; they should use this role to discourage unsafe injection practices. Efforts to extinguish the practice of lay injection entirely are less likely to meet with success so long as other means of accessing Western medicine are limited.

Adolescent↗