SEARCH · Search PubMed
Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.
Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.
A series of substituted 2-pyridyl-alpha-toluenesulfonates was synthesized for antimalarial testing. They were prepared by treating various 2-pyridinols with alpha-toluenesulfonyl chlorides in the presence of an alkali. In tests against Plasmodium berghei in mice at 640 mg/kg, only 3,5-dichloro-2-pyridyl-alpha-toluenesulfonate was considered active, i.e., doubled the mean survival time.
A series of diazomethyl ketone and chloromethyl ketone analogs prepared from N-tosyl amino acids was shown to have anti-inflammatory activity in mice at 20 mg/kg and in rats at 10 mg/kg. N-Tosyl-L-alanine and N-tosyl-beta-alanine chloromethyl ketones demonstrated the most potent anti-inflammatory activity. The writhing reflex also was inhibited at 20 mg/kg in mice. In the tail flick test, N-tosyl-D,L-alanine and N-tosyl-D,L-isoleucine chloromethyl ketones demonstrated the highest increase in time. Toxicity studies indicated good therapeutic indexes for most of these agents.
The kinetics and mechanisms of chlorine transfer from chloramine-T (CAT) to several amines are second order and independent of p-toluenesulfonamide concentration; thus, the reaction does not involve disproportionation of CAT to dichloramine-T. From the profile of pH versus rate, the following mechanisms were proposed: (1) reaction of the ionized species of CAT with the ionized amine (ionic mechanism) and (2) reaction of the un-ionized species of CAT with the un-ionized amine (nonionic mechanism). The second-order, pH-independent rate constants calculated for the ionic and nonionic mechanisms were 1.6 and 5 x 10(6) M-1 s-1, respectively. Although these two mechanisms are kinetically indistinguishable, the rate constant for the nonionic mechanism is of the same order of magnitude as those calculated for similar chlorination reactions involving nonionizable chloramines, such as N-chlorosuccinimide, N-chloroquinuclidine, and N-chloro-N-methylbenzenesulfonamide. The proposed mechanism for the chlorine exchange involves a molecule of water in a cyclic, six-membered transition state.
To study the mechanism of N-chlorination of secondary amines by chloramine-T, the kinetics of the reactions of some aromatic-substituted analogues of N-chlorobenzenesulfonamide with various secondary amines were determined. The importance of amine basicity and reactivity of the N-Cl bond of the N-chlorobenzenesulfonamide was also assessed. The results indicate that a mechanism involving the un-ionized species of both reactants (i.e., a molecular mechanism), rather than an ionic mechanism, is operating and that the reaction most likely proceeds via a six-membered-ring transition state that incorporates a water molecule.
We synthesized biotinylated mono- and di-iodotyramine and their radioactive counterparts and used these substances as substrates to estimate serum biotinidase activity in a radioassay system. The Km values determined for mono- and di-iodobiotinyl derivatives were 15.8 and 25.9 microM, respectively, whereas, the maximum velocities of the enzymatic reaction were 27.0 and 8.7 nmol.min-1.mL-1, respectively. Both substrates competed with biocytin for the same active site of the enzyme and the Ki values were 7.30 and 9.56 microM for the mono- and di-iodinated substrate, respectively. Higher assay sensitivity was obtained using [125I]biotinyl-monoiodotyramine as substrate, and the values obtained were directly related with those determined with the well-established colorimetric method (r = 0.9377, n = 31). However, for routine use, the assay may be accomplished by diluting the radiotracer with biocytin instead of its "cold" counterpart, because it is a commercially available reagent. The values obtained in this case were very well correlated with those determined by the colorimetric assay as well (r = 0.9289, n = 31).
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
We have shown recently that inhibition of androgen receptor (AR) expression with an antisense AR oligonucleotide (ODN) inhibits LNCaP prostate tumor cells in vitro as well as in vivo. In this study, we investigated gene expression changes that occur after AR signaling blockade, either through AR elimination by antisense treatment or through complete androgen receptor inhibition by androgen deprivation combined with the antiandrogen bicalutamide, in order to search for genes that are directly or indirectly regulated through the AR. Gene expression changes were investigated with cDNA NIH 10K gene microarrays in response to treatment over 48 h. Expression of selected genes was further analyzed by real-time reverse transcriptase (RT)-polymerase chain reaction (PCR), Western blotting, and radioimmunoassay. A comparison of antisense-treated and androgen-deprived cells revealed several concordances such as significant downregulation of prostate-specific genes, cell-cycle regulatory genes, genes of the cholesterol biosynthesis pathway, and several cytoskeletal genes. However, there were also several genes that were differentially regulated. Among the genes that were exclusively changed by treatment with the antisense AR ODN were the insulin-like growth factor binding protein 2 (IGFBP2) and the phosphatidylinositol-4-phosphate 5-kinase type I alpha (PIP5KIA). On the other hand, complete androgen receptor blockade induced changes in the expression of the prostate overexpressed gene 1 and the S100 calcium binding protein P. In summary, we identified a cohort of interesting genes whose expression was highly affected by elimination of the AR in LNCaP prostate cancer cells. Further investigations are warranted to clarify their role in the AR signaling pathway and their susceptibility as a target for the treatment of prostate cancer.
Methods for quantification of bladder outlet obstruction (BOO) are still controversial. Parameters such as detrusor opening pressure (p(det.open)), maximum detrusor pressure (p(det.max)), minimum voiding pressure (p(det.min.void)), and detrusor pressure at maximum flow rate (P(det.Qmax)) separate obstructed from nonobstructed patients to some extent, but two nomograms, the Abrams-Griffiths nomogram and the linearized passive urethral resistance relation (LinPURR), are more accepted for this purpose, along with the urethral resistance algorithm. In this retrospective, methodologic study, we evaluated the properties of these parameters with regard to test-retest reproducibility and ability to detect a moderate (pharmacologic) and a pronounced (surgical) relief of bladder outlet obstruction. We studied the pressure-flow charts of 42 patients who underwent 24 weeks of androgen suppressive therapy, 42 corresponding patients who received placebo, and 30 patients who had prostate surgery. The patients performed repeat void pressure-flow examinations before and after treatment or placebo. The various parameters were compared. Among the bladder pressure parameters, P(det.Qmax) seemed to have some advantages, supporting the belief that it is the most relevant detrusor pressure parameter to include in nomograms to quantify BOO. In assessment of a large decrease in urethral resistance, such as after TURp, resistance parameters that are based on maximum flow rate as well as detrusor pressure are preferable.
The androgen receptor co-activator CREB (cAMP-response element binding protein)-binding protein (CBP) enhances androgen receptor activity after stimulation by androgenic hormones and androgen receptor antagonists. The aim of the present study was to investigate the regulation of CBP expression by steroid and peptide hormones in prostate cancer. For this purpose, LNCaP cells were treated with the synthetic androgen methyltrienolone (R1881), epidermal growth factor, insulin-like growth factor-I or interleukin-6 (IL-6). CBP protein and mRNA expression were studied by western blotting and real-time PCR, respectively. CBP expression was also investigated in tissue specimens obtained from 26 patients with therapy-resistant carcinoma of the prostate. In LNCaP cells, CBP protein was down-regulated by R1881 or IL-6. The non-steroidal anti-androgen bicalutamide antagonized the effects of R1881 and the Janus kinase inhibitor AG 490 reversed the effects of IL-6. In contrast, neither R1881 nor IL-6 caused any effect on CBP expression in the PC-3 cell line. In LNCaP cells, the inhibition of CBP expression by R1881 or IL-6 was also observed at the mRNA level. CBP protein was detected in all 26 specimens by immunohistochemistry. The results suggest that up-regulation of CBP during androgen ablation may be relevant to the failure of endocrine therapy in patients with prostate carcinoma.
It has recently been demonstrated that phosphorylation of FADD at serine 194 plays an important role in the induction of apoptosis by anti-cancer drugs in human prostate cancer cells. The present study has assessed whether this phosphorylation status is valuable as a marker for human prostate cancer progression, and has investigated its biological role in cell growth. Immunohistochemical studies revealed much higher phosphorylation of FADD at serine 194 in normal epithelial cells than in cancer cells, although FADD was found to be highly expressed to the same extent in both cases. The positivity for phosphorylated FADD was significantly lower for patients with a Gleason score greater than or equal to 7, a positive surgical margin, extracapsular or seminal vesicle invasion. In addition, a relationship was also apparent in cancer cells refractory to neoadjuvant hormonal therapy. Interestingly, in Gleason score 3 + 4 tumours, the positivity for FADD phosphorylation was statistically increased by neoadjuvant hormonal therapy, resulting in a reduced percentage of cases with a positive surgical margin and extracapsular invasion. In vitro data showed different functions of phosphorylated and non-phosphorylated FADD: in normal epithelial cells, overexpression of a phosphorylation-mimicking mutant FADD (S194E) caused G2/M cell-cycle arrest, while a non-phosphorylation-mimicking mutant (S194A) had no effect, whereas S194A overexpression resulted in cell cycle progression and enhanced colony-forming activity in cancer cells, but S194E FADD was without influence. These results clearly demonstrate that transition from phosphorylated FADD to the non-phosphorylated form might be associated with carcinogenesis and that induction of FADD phosphorylation could therefore be a target for chemohormonal therapy of human prostate cancer. Moreover, assessment of FADD phosphorylation may be useful as a new biomarker to predict cancer progression.
PURPOSE: To analyse the type and main features of the hepatotoxicity induced by steroidal and non-steroidal antiandrogens spontaneously reported by physicians, pharmacists and nurses. This analysis could increase the information related to these adverse reactions mainly available from the published isolated cases. METHODS: Using the Spanish Pharmacovigilance database we searched for spontaneous reports recorded since the date of approval of each antiandrogen up to the present time. We analysed the frequency of liver disorders, the preferred terms coded, the presence of other hepatotoxic drugs, and the characteristics of cases of hepatitis. RESULTS: Liver disorders were the most common adverse reactions associated with flutamide and bicalutamide, but not with cyproterone acetate. 'Hepatitis' and 'cholestatic hepatitis' were the most frequent terms coded. In 38% of the reports related to cyproterone acetate, 18% of those related to flutamide and 33% of those related to bicalutamide the patient had simultaneously received other hepatotoxic drugs. The disproportionality analysis of hepatitis showed a strong association with flutamide and a weak association with bicalutamide and cyproterone acetate. Mean doses of flutamide and bicalutamide were very close to their defined daily dose (DDD) to treat prostate cancer, although in the case of cyproterone acetate it was slightly higher. The latency period of hepatitis was between 3 and 10 months for the three antiandrogens, and the recovery period was shorter (0.5-3 months). The majority of the reported cases of hepatitis evolved favourably. CONCLUSION: Our results highlight the hepatotoxic potential of flutamide compared to cyproterone acetate. The data related to bicalutamide should be cautiously considered due to the smaller number of reports.
Proteins responsive to androgen and anti-androgen may be involved in the development and progression of prostate cancer and the ultimate failure of androgen-ablation therapy. These proteins represent potential diagnostic and therapeutic targets for improved management of prostate cancer. We have investigated the effect of androgen (R1881) and anti-androgen (bicalutamide) on the androgen-responsive prostate cancer LNCaP cell line using a quantitative gel-based proteomic approach. Prior to analysis, the in vitro system was evaluated for reproducibility and validated by appropriate molecular responses to treatment. Six replicate samples were independently generated and analysed by 2-D DIGE. According to strict statistical criteria, 197 spots were differentially expressed, of which we have successfully identified 165 spots corresponding to 125 distinct proteins. Following androgen supplementation, 108 spots (68 proteins) were increased and 57 spots (39 proteins) were decreased. Essentially no difference was observed between control and anti-androgen-treated samples, confirming the absence of "off-target" effects of bicalutamide. Identified proteins were involved in diverse processes including the stress response and intracellular signalling. The potential contribution to disease of these processes and identified constituent proteins are discussed. This rigorous, statistically supported study of androgen responses has provided a number of potential candidates for development as diagnostic/prognostic markers and drug targets.
BACKGROUND: The meta-analysis of maximal androgen blockade (MAB) concluded that there is no survival advantage of MAB over castration alone. However, the results from the largest trials yield conflicting results. METHODS: The design and results of three trials were examined. RESULTS: Most studies were planned to detect an over-optimistic difference in survival and immature data were published. The survival curves show that statistical assumptions are not fulfilled. Excluding from the meta-analysis all trials where a negative impact of disease flare on survival could not be excluded resulted in no difference in survival between MAB and castration. CONCLUSIONS: Trials of MAB should be planned to detect differences of no more than 5-10% in median survival. The analyses should only be carried out on mature data and should take into account the possibility of a negative impact on survival due to disease flare if no anti-androgen has been given initially with an LH-RH agonist.
BACKGROUND: The effect of an EGF-R selective tyrosine kinase (EGF-RTK) quinazoline inhibitor ZM252868 was determined on the androgen-sensitive human prostatic tumour cell line LNCaP, which can also respond via the EGF-R-regulated growth pathway for cell proliferation. Potential interaction or 'cross-talk' between steroid and the growth factor mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) signalling pathway was also investigated. METHODS: The responses of LNCaP cells to various growth factors in the absence and presence of the EGF-RTK inhibitor and/or steroid and anti-androgen Casodex, was determined using cell population analysis. The effect of the inhibitor on the expression of androgen receptor, EGF-R and activated MAPK was assessed immunocytochemically and changes in the MAPK signalling cascade were also determined using Western blotting techniques. RESULTS: The ZM252868 inhibitor had no effect on LNCaP basal growth. At 100 nM and 1 microM concentrations, the inhibitor reduced the marked EGF- and TGF-alpha-stimulated LNCaP cell growth by 60% and to basal levels, respectively. Both bFGF- and 5alpha-DHT-stimulated growth were unaffected in this concentration range. The inhibitor (1 microM) decreased the expression of immunoreactive EGF-R but had no effect on androgen receptor levels. Activation of MAPK by EGF was noted, being down-regulated by the inhibitor at a concentration of 1 microM. MAPK was not activated by 5alpha-DHT. The anti-androgen Casodex reduced 5alpha-DHT-stimulated cell growth but had no effect on EGF-R mediated LNCaP growth or EGF-stimulated activated MAPK activity. Treatment with EGF and 5alpha-DHT in combination produced an additive effect on cell proliferation, with the anti-androgen and the EGF-RTK inhibitor only reducing the 5alpha-DHT- or EGF-stimulated portion of growth, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The study demonstrated the efficacy and selectivity of the ZM252868 inhibitor in inhibiting EGF-R mediated LNCaP cell growth. Additionally, no interaction between androgen and EGF-R mediated growth pathways was determined.
BACKGROUND: The androgen receptor and activator protein-1 (AP-1) transcription factors affect growth regulation in normal and cancerous prostate cells. Effects of androgen-activated androgen receptor on AP-1 activity were determined in the LNCaP human prostate carcinoma cell model. METHODS: Cells were exposed to 1 nM androgen +/- antiandrogen bicalutamide. Cellular growth and cell cycle effects were determined by DNA, viability, and bromodeoxyuridine (BrdU) fluorescence activated cell sorter (FACS) assays. AP-1 effects were determined by an AP-1-luciferase enzyme reporter vector for transcriptional activity, electrophoretic mobility shift assay (EMSA)/antibody supershift for DNA-binding, quantitative RT-PCR for mRNA, and immunoblot for protein. RESULTS: Androgen induced G(1) growth arrest. This growth arrest was abrogated by treatment with bicalutamide, demonstrating that growth arrest by androgen was due to androgen receptor activation. Concurrently, AP-1 DNA-binding and transcriptional activity was induced over 96 hr androgen exposure, which was also inhibited by bicalutamide. Interestingly, although no change in AP-1 transcriptional activity was observed 24 hr after androgen exposure, there was an increase in Fra-2 expression and AP-1 DNA-binding. Paradoxically, while Fra-2 mRNA and protein levels continued to increase, binding of Fra-2 to the AP-1 site decreased over 96 hr, with a concomitant increase in JunD AP-1-binding and a marked increase in expression of the 35 kDa form of JunD. Enhanced expression of this short form of JunD is a novel effect of androgen exposure that occurred during the 24-96 hr time period, as growth effects emerged. CONCLUSION: Activation of androgen receptor by androgen induces changes in AP-1 activity and AP-1 factor DNA-binding that may contribute significantly to androgen-induced changes in prostate cancer cell growth.
BACKGROUND: A cross-talk between 1alpha,25-dihydroxyvitamin D(3) [1alpha,25-(OH)(2)D(3)] and 5alpha-dihydrotestosterone (DHT) in the growth inhibition has been demonstrated, but the mechanism is unknown. METHODS: The expression of 25-hydroxyvitamin D(3) 24-hydroxylase (24-hydroxylase) was measured using a real-time quantitative RT-PCR assay and the catabolism of 1alpha,25-(OH)(2)D(3) was measured using a radioreceptor assay. RESULTS: Real-time RT-PCR showed that DHT at 1-100 nM significantly inhibited 1alpha,25-(OH)(2)D(3)-induced expression of 24-hydroxylase in LNCaP cells. Furthermore, the catabolism of 1alpha,25-(OH)(2)D(3) was decreased by 10 nM DHT. An androgen receptor (AR) antagonist, Casodex antagonized the DHT effect, whereas an AR agonist (due to the mutant AR in LNCaP cells) hydroxyflutamide did not. CONCLUSIONS: We demonstrated, for the first time, that DHT reduces the ability of 1alpha,25-(OH)(2)D(3) to induce 24-hydroxylase expression. Our results not only support the earlier finding of a cross-talk between androgen and vitamin D in human prostate cancer cells but also provide a possible mechanism how androgen and vitamin D signaling pathways may interact.
BACKGROUND: 1,25(OH)2D3 inhibits the growth of prostate cancer cells; previous reports suggest that 1,25(OH)2D3 actions in LNCaP prostate cancer cells are androgen dependent. This is due in part to the observation that the androgen receptor (AR) antagonist, Casodex, modestly inhibits LNCaP cell growth, but reduces the greater growth inhibition induced by 1,25(OH)2D3 to the level of Casodex alone. Because androgen ablation therapy is used for metastatic prostate cancer, we sought to better characterize this androgen dependence. METHODS: We have assessed the requirement for endogenous androgens in 1,25(OH)2D3 mediated growth inhibition of AR+ prostate cancer cell lines. We have also sought the mechanism for anti-androgen mediated reversal of 1,25(OH)2D3 dependent growth inhibition in LNCaP cells. RESULTS: Although 1,25(OH)2D3 does not inhibit the growth of LNCaP cells grown in medium lacking androgens, we find that growth of androgen independent derivatives of LNCaP cells is inhibited by 1,25(OH)2D3. Despite this independence, Casodex treatment reduced the response of these cells to 1,25(OH)2D3 suggesting a unique function for Casodex-bound AR. Because Casodex does not directly inhibit the transcriptional activity of the vitamin D receptor (VDR) we sought a common primary target of VDR and AR action whose VDR dependent transcription could be repressed by Casodex. We report that AS3 (APRIN), a novel gene required for androgen dependent growth arrest, is a primary target for 1,25(OH)2D3 and androgens. Moreover, Casodex reduces induction of AS3 by 1,25(OH)2D3 suggesting that it is a candidate for the Casodex effect. Analysis of functional interactions between AR and VDR in other AR containing prostate cancer cells lines (PC-3 AR, LAPC-4, and 22Rv1) revealed that Casodex reversal was unique to LNCaP derived cells. CONCLUSION: Anti-androgen mediated reversal of 1,25(OH)2D3 dependent growth inhibition is limited to LNCaP derived prostate cancer cell lines. Moreover, the growth of androgen independent derivatives of LNCaP cells in medium depleted of androgens is strongly inhibited by 1,25D. Therefore, most forms of androgen ablation should not eliminate the utility of VDR agonist treatment in most prostate cancers.
BACKGROUND: Some mutations of androgen receptor (AR) confer resistance to antiandrogen to prostate cancer (PC) cells. Previously we reported that LNCaP-cxD2 cells established from androgen-dependent LNCaP-FGC PC cells as an antiandrogen bicalutamide-resistant subline harbor W741C/L mutation in the AR gene. In this report, we examined one possible mechanism of the resistance. METHODS: Change in the gene expression and the protein levels relevant to mutagenesis in LNCaP-FGC cells during bicalutamide-treatment was assessed. The AR sequence of bicalutamide-resistant LNCaP-cxD2 cells was compared with that of parental LNCaP-FGC cells. RESULTS: The expression of DNA polymerases (Pol) switched from high-fidelity subset to error-prone subset, and DNA mismatch repair proteins (MMR) were down-regulated. The rate of multiple mutations in the AR gene was higher in LNCaP-cxD2 cells than LNCaP-FGC cells. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest the hypermutational state might occur in LNCaP-FGC cells during bicalutamide-treatment, which might create the W741C/L mutant AR leading to bicalutamide-resistance.