Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “SMELL”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 361 records · Page 20Linked to original sources
PubMed1984

Development of the University of Pennsylvania Smell Identification Test: a standardized microencapsulated test of olfactory function.

The development of the first standardized "scratch 'n sniff" olfactory test is described. Over 1600 subjects participated in five experiments. In Experiment 1, 50 microencapsulated odorants were rated as to their intensity, pleasantness, irritation, coolness, and familiarity, and two procedures for releasing them were compared. In Experiment 2, the results of the first experiment and other data were used in the development of the test, which was administered to a large number of subjects. Using multiple regression analysis, scores on this test were shown to be significantly related to the subjects' gender, ethnic background, and smoking behavior. Average test scores decreased as a function of age, with the greatest decline occurring between the sixth and tenth decades of life. These age-related changes were not correlated with scores on the Wechsler Memory Scale. Women performed better than men within all age categories. In Experiment 3, the test was shown to differentiate between subjects with known olfactory disorders (e.g., Kallmann's syndrome; Korsakoff's syndrome) and normal controls, and to reliably detect persons instructed to feign total anosmia. In Experiment 4, the test-retest reliability was established (6-month interval; r = 0.918, p less than 0.001), and in Experiment 5 the test was shown to correlate thresholds with odor detection (r = -0.794, p less than 0.001). This self-administratered test now makes it possible to rapidly and accurately assess general olfactory function in the laboratory, clinic, or through the mail without complex equipment or space-consuming stores of chemicals.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1993

Taste and smell sensations enhance the satiating effect of both a high-carbohydrate and a high-fat meal in humans.

The effects of meal sensory properties (tasty vs. bland) and nutrient composition [high-CHO (carbohydrate) vs. high-FAT] on hunger ratings, blood glucose and free fatty acids (FFA), taste perception, and subsequent food intake, were studied in human subjects. Aspartame and vanilla were used to augment meal palatability, yielding four isocaloric liquid meals: bland-FAT, tasty-FAT, bland-CHO, tasty-CHO. Normal-weight, nondieting young adults consumed each of the meals for breakfast on separate days. The main finding was that tasty versions of high-FAT and high-CHO meals were more satiating than nutritionally identical bland meals, as indicated by a greater decrease in hunger ratings following the tasty meals. Changes in blood glucose and FFA were related to meal nutrient composition, but not to meal sensory properties. High-CHO meals tended to be more satiating than high-FAT meals. Consumption of each of the meals produced a similar decrease in pleasantness ratings of food-related tastes. Intake of carbohydrates was significantly higher at a self-selected lunch 5.25 h following a tasty breakfast. These findings indicate that hunger is decreased to a greater extent by meals flavored with aspartame and vanilla relative to nutritionally identical, unflavored meals. The satiety-enhancing effect of oral stimulation was found for both high-FAT and high-CHO meals.

Adult↗
PubMed1995

Regulation of nutrient intake in humans: a theory based on taste and smell.

Oral and pharyngeal recognition of the chemical structure of physiologically relevant nutrients is proposed as a mechanism for regulating nutrient intake. Taste buds and olfactory receptors are proposed as the primary sites of recognition. Oral and pharyngeal sensory signals may be sufficient for producing satiation and termination of a meal provided the initiation of the meal is triggered by the body's need to replenish a deficient nutrient. A discussion of the impact of disturbances of normal regulation and some questions this model generates are also incorporated.

Eating↗
PubMed1996

Proteins that smell: pheromone recognition and signal transduction.

Pheromone perception in Lepidoptera requires initial recognition and transport of the pheromone molecule by ligand-specific pheromone binding proteins (PBPs) in the moth antennae, followed by recognition of the ligand or PBP-ligand complex by a transmembrane G-protein-coupled odorant receptor protein. This signal is transduced by activation of a specific phospholipase C, intracellular release of inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate (IP3) and IP3-gated opening of an ion channel. Individual pheromone-specific PBPs provide the initial ligand recognition event and encode ligand specificity. We have used photoaffinity labeling, cDNA library screening and cloning, protein expression, a novel binding assay and site-directed mutagenesis to define the ligand specificity of PBPs.

Amino Acid Sequence↗
PubMed2004

A Nobel for smell.

Explore the source record for details and available documents.

History, 20th Century↗
PubMed2006

Olfactory coding: when smells collide.

Brain responses can significantly outlast sensory stimuli leading to potential ambiguity when responses overlap. Recent studies of locust olfaction found that the responses of individual second order projection neurons depend markedly on the previous few seconds' stimulus history; the population response, however, still conveys information about both temporal structure and odour identity.

Animals↗
PubMed2005

The smell of danger: a behavioral and neural analysis of predator odor-induced fear.

The odors of predators used in animal models provide, in addition to electric footshock, an important means to investigate the neurobiology of fear. Studies indicate that cat odor and trimethylthiazoline (TMT), a synthetic compound isolated from fox feces, are often presented to rodents to induce fear-related responses including freezing, avoidance, stress hormone and, in some tests, risk assessment behavior. Furthermore, we report that different amounts of cat odor impregnated on small-, medium-, or large-sized cloths impact the display of fear-related behavior when presented to rats. That is, rats exposed to a large cat odor containing cloth exhibit an increase in fear behavior, particularly freezing, which remains at high levels in habituation tests administered over a period of 7 days. The large cloth also induces a long-lasting increase in avoidance behavior during repeated habituation and extinction tests. A review of the brain regions involved in predator odor-induced fear behavior indicates a modulatory role of the medial amygdala, bed nucleus of the stria terminalis, and dorsal premammillary nucleus. In addition, the basolateral amygdala is involved in fear behavior induced by cat odor but not TMT, and the central amygdala does not appear to play a major behavioral role in predator odor-induced fear. Future research involving the use of predator odor is likely to rapidly expand knowledge on the neurobiology of fear, which has implications for understanding fear-related psychopathology.

Amygdala↗
PubMed2004

Neural processing at the speed of smell.

Olfaction is typically described as behaviorally slow, suggesting neural processes on the order of hundreds of milliseconds to seconds as candidate mechanisms in the creation of olfactory percepts. Whereas a recent study challenged this view in suggesting that a single sniff was sufficient for optimal olfactory discrimination, a study by Abraham et al. in this issue of Neuron sets out to negate the challenge by demonstrating increased processing time for discrimination of similar versus dissimilar stimuli. Here we reconcile both studies, which in our view together support the notion of a speed-accuracy tradeoff in olfactory discriminations that are made within about 200 ms. These findings are discussed in light of the challenges related to defining olfactory perceptual similarity in nonhuman animals.

Animals↗
PubMed2005

Wake up and smell the pheromones.

Odorant binding proteins (OBPs) are abundant proteins of unknown function expressed at high levels in insect and vertebrate chemosensory organs. In this issue of Neuron, Xu et al. show that Drosophila OBP76a is necessary for fruit flies to respond to the aggregation pheromone 11-cis vaccenyl acetate. The results suggest a mechanism by which this OBP is intimately involved in pheromone signal transduction.

Animals↗
PubMed2006

Learning to smell the roses: experience-dependent neural plasticity in human piriform and orbitofrontal cortices.

It is widely presumed that odor quality is a direct outcome of odorant structure, but human studies indicate that molecular knowledge of an odorant is not always sufficient to predict odor quality. Indeed, the same olfactory input may generate different odor percepts depending on prior learning and experience. Combining functional magnetic resonance imaging with an olfactory paradigm of perceptual learning, we examined how sensory experience modifies odor perception and odor quality coding in the human brain. Prolonged exposure to a target odorant enhanced perceptual differentiation for odorants related in odor quality or functional group, an effect that was paralleled by learning-induced response increases in piriform cortex and orbitofrontal cortex (OFC). Critically, the magnitude of OFC activation predicted subsequent improvement in behavioral differentiation. Our findings suggest that neural representations of odor quality can be rapidly updated through mere perceptual experience, a mechanism that may underlie the development of odor perception.

Adult↗
PubMed2005

The anatomical logic of smell.

Olfactory receptor neurons (ORNs) expressing the same odorant receptor gene share ligand-receptor affinity profiles and converge onto common glomerular targets in the brain. The activation patterns of different ORN populations, evoked by differential binding of odorant molecular moieties, constitute the primary odor representation. However, odorants possess properties other than receptor-binding sites that can contribute to odorant discrimination. Among terrestrial vertebrates, odorant sorptiveness--volatility and water solubility--imposes physicochemical constraints on migration through the nose during inspiration. The non-uniform distributions of ORN populations along the inspiratory axis enable sorptiveness to modify odor representations by affecting the number of molecules reaching different receptors during a sniff. Animals can then modify and analyze odor representation further by the dynamic regulation of sniffing.

Animals↗