SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Perforations”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

SourceResearch connectionFrom yearThrough year

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 361 records · Page 20Linked to original sources

PubMed1990

[Perforating folliculitis].

We report the case of a 20-year old male patient without significant familial or personal history who presented with a disseminated papular eruption on the abdomen, flanks and buttocks. The eruption was continual and proceeded by outbreaks, but it was not influenced by seasons. Physical examination of the skin, mucosae and skin appendages was otherwise normal. Histological examination showed all the criteria of perforating folliculitis as described by Mehregan and Coskey. On the basis of our case we would put perforating folliculitis back among the perforating dermatoses. The concept of this curious phenomenon is briefly reviewed; perforating folliculitis is part of the third group of the so-called primary forms. The clinical features are suggestive of the disease, with its small pigmented papules centred around a keratotic plug, forming a permanent disseminated eruption. Histology shows a granuloma facing a lateral perforation of the hair follicle, a pseudo-epitheliomatous epithelial hyperplasia and the presence of hair and keratin debris in the perforation. Various keratolytic treatments have been applied without success; retinoids have not been tried. The main diagnostic and nosological problem is Kyrle's disease. In view of clinical and histological data, many authors regard Kyrle's disease as a major form of perforating folliculitis. Pruritus, ascribed to an underlying illness in Kyrle's disease, is thought to increase the importance of the lesions. The specificity of perforating folliculitis is discussed, but it seems that side by side with secondary forms occurring in recognized diseases, there may be primary forms of perforating folliculitis. Dyskeratosis might be a cause of the perforation.

Adult↗

PubMed2002

Perforations and fistulae in gastrointestinal tuberculosis.

BACKGROUND: Perforation and fistulae, though uncommon, are serious complications of gastrointestinal tuberculosis. Patients with acute tuberculous perforation are subjected to surgery, whereas localized perforation and fistulae with subtle clinical signs are detected by barium contrast examination. There has been no report on radiological series regarding the incidence of perforation and fistulae, detected by barium contrast studies. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A retrospective analysis of barium contrast studies of 684 proven cases of gastrointestinal tuberculosis seen over a period of 15 years was done to detect the incidence of perforation and fistulae. RESULTS: Fifty-two patients (7.6%) with localized perforation and fistulae were seen. Twenty-eight patients had evidence of perforation, and 24 patients showed fistulae formation. The most common site of perforation and fistulae was the small bowel followed by the colon. Associated abnormalities noted were ulcerations, strictures, nodular filling defects and extrinsic compression. CONCLUSION: Perforation and fistulae along with other associated abnormalities of the gastrointestinal tract are suggestive of tuberculosis, particularly in a population predisposed to tuberculous infection.

Adolescent↗

PubMed1989

Esophageal perforation.

Sixty-nine patients with perforation of the esophagus were treated at the University of California, San Francisco, from 1977 to 1988. The perforation was iatrogenic in 33 (48%) of the patients, spontaneous in 8 (12%), and a result of external trauma in 23 (33%). Clinical findings included chest pain in 36 (52%) of 69 patients, subcutaneous emphysema in 22 (32%) of 59 patients, and pneumomediastinum in 21 (36%) of 59 patients. Esophagograms demonstrated the perforation in 40 (93%) of 43 patients. Treatment delays of more than 24 hours occurred in about half of spontaneous and iatrogenic perforations, but when the perforation was due to external trauma, treatment was delayed infrequently. Operative therapy in 59 (86%) of the patients included primary closure in 44 patients, drainage alone in 9 patients, and Celestin tube placement in 1 patient. Four patients with benign strictures had esophagectomy, and 4 patients with achalasia had Heller myotomy in addition to closure of the perforation. Eight (12%) of the patients were treated nonoperatively. For thoracic perforations, nonoperative treatment was reserved for patients who were diagnosed late but who had minimal evidence of sepsis. Seven (10%) of the patients died. Factors that influenced outcome included cause of perforation, anatomic location, and patient age. Our study shows that a high index of suspicion, aggressive use of esophagography, and individualized treatment are necessary for the best results when treating esophageal perforation.

Adolescent↗

PubMed1996

Improved survival in children with esophageal perforation.

OBJECTIVE: To analyze the cause, location, signs and symptoms, presence of underlying disease, time interval to diagnosis, treatment, and morbidity and mortality in 24 children (19 boys and 5 girls) with esophageal perforation who were treated from 1975 to 1995. DESIGN: Data were collected retrospectively from hospital and office records. SETTING: A tertiary care children's hospital. RESULTS: The average age at diagnosis was 58 months (range, 1 day to 19 years). Fourteen children had underlying esophageal disease (atresia, n = 7 and gastroesophageal reflux, n = 7). Iatrogenic perforations occurred in 17 children: 8 during dilatation, 5 during an antireflux procedure, 2 during endoscopy, and 2 after passage of a feeding tube. Trauma was the cause of perforation in 6 children. In 2 cases the cause was unknown. Perforation occurred in the thoracic esophagus in 12 cases, abdominal esophagus in 7, cervical esophagus in 5, and involved both the thoracic and abdominal esophagus in 1. Signs and symptoms included dysphagia (15 patients), dyspnea (14), fever (12), cyanosis (8), abdominal pain (6), chest pain (5), and subcutaneous emphysema (3). Management of esophageal perforation included nonoperative management (7 patients), drainage alone (1), primary closure (16), and resection and diversion (1). Two perforations occurred in 1 child. Complications occurred in 11 (44%) of the 25 cases and were more common after delayed diagnosis (73%). The average hospital stay was 20 days. There was 1 death (4%) attributed to esophageal perforation. CONCLUSIONS: Morbidity and mortality are directly related to delays in diagnosis and therapy. Most cases of esophageal perforation in children can be closed primarily and the esophagus salvaged despite delayed presentation. The mortality rate in children with esophageal perforation (4%) is significantly less than that for adults (25%-50%).

Adolescent↗

PubMed2001

Sigmoid perforation following radiation therapy in patients with cervical cancer.

OBJECTIVE: We describe the clinical presentation, evaluation, management, and outcome of patients experiencing sigmoid perforation following radiation therapy for cervical cancer. METHODS: A database consisting of over 5000 patients with stage IB-IIIB cervix cancer treated between 1963 and 1992 revealed 35 patients with sigmoid perforation. Twenty-seven were diagnosed and managed at one institution, and they form the study group. RESULTS: The median age at the time of perforation was 50 years, and the median follow-up care was 78 months (range 6-396). The median time from completion of radiotherapy to perforation was 13 months (range 3-98). The mean interval from the first documented complaint to the index admission was 90 days. Nine (33%) of 27 patients were treated with high-dose radiation therapy. The most common complaint was abdominal pain in 25 (93%) patients, nausea occurred in 12 (44%) patients, weight loss in 12 (44%) patients, and vomiting in 10 (37%) patients. The pain was described as mild in 16 (73%) of 22 patients. Only 5 (18.5%) of 27 patients had physical signs of acute peritonitis, 8 (30%) of 27 patients had some form of tenderness, and 11 (41%) of 27 had a benign exam. A total of 20 (74%) patients had an abdominal radiograph, and 12 (44%) patients had a contrast enema for evaluation. Evidence of perforation was present in 5 (25%) of 20 plain abdominal radiographs and 1 (8%) of 12 contrast enemas. Following admission, 17 (63%) patients were observed initially with subsequent surgery after symptoms either failed to resolve or worsened. The median duration under observation was 4 days (range 1-23). Surgery was performed immediately in 8 patients (30%), and 2 (7%) were observed without operation. In these 2 patients, perforation was diagnosed postmortem. Seventeen (68%) of 25 patients had a localized abscess. Three of the patients who underwent immediate exploration and 7 who had surgery after a period of observation died postoperatively (10/25, 40%). Five (55%) of 9 patients in the group who received high-dose radiation therapy died because of sigmoid perforation. When the time frame of presentation was evaluated, we noted that 10 (50%) of 20 patients died between 1960 and 1979 and 1 (14%) of 7 died between 1980 and 1992. CONCLUSIONS: Sigmoid perforation following pelvic radiation for cervical cancer does not usually present with the typical signs of a ruptured viscus. A high degree of suspicion remains a priority in the care of radiated patients who present with abdominal pain given the atypical presentation of perforation in this group.

Adenocarcinoma↗

PubMed1979

Perforation of the colon associated with cytomegalovirus infection.

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) inclusions were found at colonic perforation sites in three patients with clinical settings suggesting a compromised immunologic status. This could be interpreted as: (1) CMV was an etiologic agent in these perforations; or (2) CMV was an opportunistic superinfection in areas of preexisting inflammation. To determine which interpretation was more likely, we examined material from these three and ten similar patients with colonic perforations, identifying any potential causative factors present. Eleven of the 13 patients had an identifiable cause of perforation, either tumor, diverticulitis, arteritis, or pancreatic pseudocyst, while two remained unexplained. If the presence of CMV merely represented an opportunistic superinfection, then all 13 should have been at equal risk of infection. However, CMV was present in only one of the 11 cases with another identifiable cause of perforation but was present in both of the cases without another cause. This is consistent with the hypothesis that CMV was in fact an etiologic or contributing factor in those cases where it was present. Other cases of CMV infection of the gastrointestinal tract were studied to determine the mechanism by which this infection could lead to perforation of a viscus. In our three cases with perforation, four additional cases of CMV infection of the colon which we have studied, and 30 other cases in the literature, CMV inclusions were found only in areas of ulceration or perforation, never in undamaged mucosa. Thus there is as yet no evidence that CMV can be a primary cause of colonic mucosal injury. It remains likely, however, that a mucosal injury due to another cause may be followed by CMV infection of the granulation tissue which then may lead to further injury and perforation.

Adult↗

PubMed1996

Imaging gastrointestinal perforation in pediatric blunt abdominal trauma.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the role of imaging, in particular CT, in the early detection of GI perforation. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: In a 10-year period, 43 patients with surgically confirmed GI perforation were identified from hospital records; 22 of these had preoperative CT evaluation. Medical records and radiology were retrospectively reviewed and CT studies were particularly assessed for extraluminal air, free intraperitoneal fluid, bowel wall thickening, bowel wall enhancement, and bowel dilatation. During the study period an additional 12 trauma patients were identified who had CT studies demonstrating the above findings, but who had hypovolemic shock bowel or nondisrupting bowel injury without perforation evident. RESULTS: Extraluminal air was demonstrated in 47 % of the imaged perforations. There was one false-positive extraluminal air. Perforation was confirmed in patients who had all five of the above CT findings, but this was the case for only 18 % of patients with perforation. One or more of the five specified CT findings were present in all CT studies reviewed. No false-negative CT study was performed in the study period. CONCLUSION: Separating nondisrupting bowel injury from perforation is diagnostically difficult; however, CT remains a good modality for assessing GI perforation in pediatric blunt trauma, but it cannot replace diligent and repeated clinical evaluation of all potential perforation victims.

Abdominal Injuries↗

PubMed1993

Focal gastrointestinal perforations not associated with necrotizing enterocolitis in very low birth weight neonates.

Nine very low birth weight (VLBW) neonates (< 1,000 g) undergoing abdominal exploration for peritonitis were found to have focal perforations of the gastrointestinal (GI) tract and no clinical or histologic evidence of necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) or other mechanical cause. Although most patients presented initially with clinical findings suggestive of NEC, none developed the traditional clinical or radiographic findings associated with this diagnosis. Most patients initially had normal bowel gas patterns or transient bowel distension on abdominal x-ray, followed within hours by a paucity of bowel gas or a totally gasless abdomen. Paracentesis was positive in 7 patients. A blue, purplish, or dusky discoloration of the abdomen was described in 7 patients prior to surgery. Surgery was performed at an average age of 16.7 days. In all, the bowel appeared grossly normal with the exception of a 0.3- to 1-cm focal perforation of the small intestine or colon. One patient had an additional similar perforation of the stomach. Treatment in most was simple exteriorization of the perforation. The one gastric perforation was oversewn. Biopsy specimens at the site of perforation from 4 patients were described as having focal necrosis without intrinsic bowel disease. Two were noted to have Candida invading the bowel wall. Unlike the typical bowel flora found on culture in infants with perforations due to NEC, these patients had cultures and histological specimens positive for Candida and/or Staphylococcus epidermidis. We conclude that focal GI perforations occurring in the VLBW infant represent a clinically distinct phenomenon and that the traditionally accepted diagnostic criteria for bowel perforation due to NEC are unreliable in this condition.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Diagnosis, Differential↗

PubMed1994

Ear drum perforations in children after ventilation tube treatment.

About 1% of ears treated with straight Teflon tubes get permanent drum perforations after extrusion of the tubes, according to the literature. This paper reports the results of treatment of 20 ears in 17 children who underwent myringoplasty to repair such perforations at a mean age of 9.6 years and with a mean follow-up of 2.4 years. The following history was found: 60% (12/20) perforated after 1 insertion, 47% (9/19) perforated within 12 months after insertion. Seventy percent (14/20) had recurrent infectious problems during tube-treatment and after the perforation was diagnosed. The mean preoperative air-bone gap was 17.9 dB. In 85% (17/20) there was a pure perforation at the site of the previous tube while 3 children had perforations combined with retractions. All drums healed after surgery without serious ventilation problems except in one child. There was no serious infectious problems. The mean postoperative air-bone gap was 10.6 dB. Active removal of long-lasting tubes (> 12 months) is not motivated considering the positive effects of tube treatment in many children and the few perforations that occur. A Teflon tube is a good choice as a standard tube with few perforations that can be successfully surgically treated if self-ventilation and good ear-hygiene is instituted.

Adolescent↗

PubMedDate not supplied

Tympanic membrane changes in central tympanic membrane perforations.

PURPOSE: The objective of this study was to evaluate the histopathological changes in central tympanic membrane perforations caused by chronic otitis media without cholesteatoma. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty-nine temporal bones from 25 patients (13 male patients and 12 female patients) with central tympanic membrane perforations-18 chronic otitis media with perforation and 11 chronic otitis media with perforation caused by ventilation tubes-and 30 aged-matched normal temporal bones were included in this study. A scale was used to evaluate the extension of the migration of stratified squamous epithelium in the inner surface of the tympanic membrane. The thickness of tympanic membranes was measured halfway between the annular ligament and the perforation and compared with that of the normal bones. The presence of tympanosclerosis and papillary projections of squamous epithelium was also noted. RESULTS: The extension of the migration of stratified squamous epithelium in the inner surface of the tympanic membrane was observed in 11 of the 29 perforations (38%). The thickness of tympanic membranes was significantly different between the perforation groups and the control group. Of the 29 tympanic membranes, 13 (44%) had tympanosclerosis and 8 (28%) revealed papillary projections of squamous epithelium. CONCLUSIONS: Our study shows that a central tympanic perforation should not merely be considered as a simple defect. Most of the tympanic membranes showed one or more signs of sequelae or persistent abnormalities such as tympanosclerosis, papillary projections, thickening, and ingrowth without significant differences between the 2 central perforation groups.

Adolescent↗

PubMedDate not supplied

Outcomes in children with perforated tympanic membranes after tympanostomy tube placement: results using a pilot treatment algorithm.

PURPOSE: The objective of this study was to examine the success of a pilot treatment algorithm for tympanic membrane perforations in children after tympanostomy tube placement. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective chart review of children with diagnosed tympanic membrane perforations after tympanostomy tube placement from 1998 to 2003 at a tertiary care children's hospital was performed. The patients had been treated according to an algorithm used by 2 pediatric otolaryngologists for management of tympanic membrane perforations: observation vs myringoplasty. Success rates were examined. RESULTS: Ninety-five children were identified, 27% of whom had nonhealing perforations after tube extrusion; 73% of the perforations were caused by a retained tube. The median duration of tube retention was 48 months, ranging from 13 to 120 months. After the treatment protocol, 76% of the patients underwent gelatin film or paper patch myringoplasty, 23% had adipose myringoplasty, and 1% were observed. Overall, 91% had healed perforations after the first intervention. Among those requiring a second intervention, the sizes of initial perforations were between 15% and 40%, with postrepair perforation sizes between 5% and 40%. In addition, 75% of those requiring a second intervention underwent tympanoplasty repair and 25% had fat patch myringoplasty. None required a third intervention. CONCLUSIONS: Our treatment algorithm for children with tympanic membrane perforations after tympanostomy tube placement appears to be successful and is an excellent model for other clinicians.

Algorithms↗

PubMed2006

Endoluminal closure of large perforations of colon with clips in a porcine model (with video).

BACKGROUND: Endoluminal clip closure of small perforations of the colon is possible. It is unclear whether large perforations of the colon can be closed with clips deployed through a colonoscope. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the technical feasibility and outcome of endoluminal closure of large perforations of the colon with clips. DESIGN: Pilot study. SUBJECTS: Eight pigs. INTERVENTIONS: Endoluminal clip closure of large perforations of the colon. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: Technical feasibility of endoluminal closure was evaluated in 8 animals. A dye leak test was performed to evaluate quality of endoluminal sealing immediately after closure and 2 weeks after closure. The animals in the survival group were monitored daily for 2 weeks for sepsis and peritonitis. Necropsy was done on day 14 to check for fecal peritonitis, wound dehiscence, and histological healing of perforation. RESULTS: Endoscopic closure of colon perforation was successful in 6 of 8 animals; in 2 animals closure was unsuccessful due to prolapse of adjacent viscera into the colon (n = 1) and severe bleeding that obscured the view (n = 1). There was a leak-proof sealing of the perforation site in 2 animals tested immediately and in all the animals tested (n = 3) 2 weeks after closure. All 4 animals in the survival group recovered well, without any sepsis or peritonitis. Necropsy did not reveal fecal peritonitis or pericolonic abscess formation. The perforation site demonstrated a thin scar and there was histological healing. CONCLUSIONS: Endoluminal application of clips is successful in the closure of a large perforation of the colon in a porcine model.

Animals↗

PubMed2003

Laparoscopic oxidized cellulose (Surgicel) application for small uterine perforations.

OBJECTIVES: To test the efficacy and safety of laparoscopic oxidized cellulose application at the uterine perforation site. METHODS: In a prospective study over a 3.5-year period a total of 30 women undergoing combined surgical termination of pregnancy and laparoscopic sterilization who had a small uterine perforation were recruited. Oxidized cellulose (Surgicel) was inserted and attached to the perforation site with a laparoscope. The end point was sealing of the perforation and complete hemostasis. Laparotomy was performed if hemostasis was not achieved. RESULTS: The mean age, parity and gestation were 31.4 years, 3.8 and 9.3 weeks. The perforations occurred in the fundal region (60%), anterior wall (16.7%), posterior wall (13.3%), upper lateral wall (3.3%) and lower lateral wall (6.7%). Mean size of perforations, respectively according to site were 4.3 mm, 3.2 mm, 3.4 mm, 3 mm and 3.5 mm in the five groups. Laparoscopic oxidized cellulose application was successful in all women with fundal, anterior, posterior and upper lateral uterine wall perforations. In two women with perforations on the lower lateral wall, due to excessive blood loss, oxidized cellulose fell off; laparotomy was performed and hemostasis was achieved with sutures. All 28 laparoscopically-treated women were discharged on the next day in good condition with no complications. CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic oxidized cellulose application appears to be a safe and effective treatment for small uterine perforations that are bleeding moderately.

Adult↗

PubMed1989

Neonatal gastrointestinal perforation.

During the 7-year period from 1980 to 1986, 56 neonates with gastrointestinal (GI) perforation were treated in the Hospital for Sick Children, London. The overall mortality rate was 30%. The highest mortality rate (60%) was associated with gastric perforation, which in this series occurred only in premature neonates. Colorectal perforation carried the lowest risk of mortality (17%). The mortality rate from small bowel perforation was 35%. Prematurity and low birth weight were significant factors increasing the mortality rate from neonatal intestinal perforation. The predominant cause of perforation in the small and large intestine was necrotizing enterocolitis and the most common site of perforation was the terminal ileum. Mechanical ventilation was thought to be the cause of the perforation in four of the five neonates with gastric perforation. Primary anastomosis is a definite option in neonates who are stable intraoperatively. The mortality rate and in-patient stay for neonates who had primary anastomosis were less than for those who had stomas.

Enterocolitis, Pseudomembranous↗

PubMed1996

Prevention of persistent ear drum perforation after long-term ventilation tube treatment for otitis media with effusion in children.

The effect of tape patch technique using Steri-Strip tape in combination with freshening of the perforation edge after removal of long-term ventilation tubes for preventing permanent ear drum perforation was evaluated. The longer the tubes remained in place, the higher the incidence of persistent perforation after tube removal. The perforation rate after Goode T-tube treatment was 4.0% in the spontaneous extrusion group and 14.3% in the intentional removal group. In the ears treated by tape patch application, none of the perforations persisted after removal of the Goode T-tube. After removal or extrusion of Paparella Type II tube, perforations did not close in 13.2% of the group without tape patch application. When a tape patch was applied, only one perforation (3.3%) did not close. From these results, tape patch technique in combinations with freshening of the perforation edge at the time of tube removal was useful to promote healing and prevent persistent ear drum perforation.

Chi-Square Distribution↗

PubMedDate not supplied

Can perforated appendicitis Be diagnosed preoperatively based on admission factors?

The optimal initial treatment for selected patients with perforated appendicitis may be nonoperative. For this reason it is important to be able to diagnose perforated appendicitis preoperatively. The purpose of this study was to determine the accuracy of diagnosing perforated appendicitis using only admission factors. The study population was comprised of 366 adult patients who underwent appendectomy for presumed appendicitis during 1997. Admission factors associated with perforated appendicitis were determined using univariate and multivariate analyses. These variables were then used to formulate a rule for the diagnosis of perforated appendicitis. Sensitivity and specificity were calculated for this rule. The admission factors analyzed were sex, race, age, days of pain, temperature, heart rate, symptoms, physical examination findings, and laboratory findings. Multivariate regression analysis revealed days of pain, temperature, and localized tenderness outside the right lower quadrant to be significant (P <0.05). Using two or more days of pain, a temperature of >/=101 F (38.3 C), or localized tenderness outside the right lower quadrant as criteria to indicate perforation, we achieved a sensitivity of 86% and a specificity of 58% for distinguishing perforated from nonperforated appendicitis. We concluded that (1) perforated appendicitis cannot reliably be distinguished from nonperforated appendicitis based on admission factors, and (2) two or more days of pain, localized tenderness outside the right lower quadrant, and a temperature of >/=101 F (38.3 C) define a group of patients with appendicitis who have a high incidence of perforation.

Adolescent↗

PubMed2000

Obstruction and perforation in colorectal adenocarcinoma: an analysis of prognosis and current trends.

BACKGROUND: In adenocarcinoma of the colon and rectum, obstruction and perforation may occur either alone or together at the site of the neoplasm or proximally. Both events carry a poor prognosis. This retrospective study sought to determine whether a correlation exists between perforation and obstruction, and between these conditions and different clinicopathological factors in colorectal adenocarcinoma. METHODS: The medical records of 1950 patients with colorectal adenocarcinoma treated in our hospital during a 7-year period were retrospectively analyzed. One hundred patients (5%) were excluded from this study because of a loss of follow-up. Data on clinicopathological factors including age, sex, tumor location, surgical mortality, pathological type, stage, and long-time cancer-free rate were simultaneously analyzed. Patients were grouped as follows: Group 1, complete colonic obstruction without perforation (n = 120). Group 2, complete obstruction with perforation at the site of the cancer (n = 35); Group 3, complete obstruction with perforation proximal to the cancer (n = 13); and Group 4, nonobstructing, nonperforated cancers (n = 1682). RESULTS: When compared with Group 4, Group 1 had a more advanced Dukes' stage, older age, greater incidence of colonic versus rectal cancers, and a poorer cancer-free survival (P < or = .005). Groups 2 and 3 had a greater incidence of colonic versus rectal cancers (P < or = .004), and Group 3 had a greater operative mortality (P < .001). No significant differences were found between Groups 1, 2, and 3. Multivariate analysis revealed that the independent factors favorable to cancer-free survival (> 5-year survival) were female gender (P = .035), well-differentiated pathology (P < .001), uncomplicated cases (P = .004), colon versus rectal location (P < .001), and early stage (P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: The perioperative mortality rate for perforated colorectal cancer at the site of the cancer was 9%; for obstructive colorectal cancer, 5%. Perioperative mortality was much greater for perforations of the colon and rectum occurring proximal to the cancer (31%). Survival was worse (P < .001) for patients with obstruction (33%) or perforation proximal to the cancer (33%). The site of perforation did not appear to impact the 5-year survival, although the numbers are relatively small.

Adenocarcinoma↗

PubMed2004

Selective approach in the treatment of esophageal perforations.

BACKGROUND: Treatment of esophageal perforation remains controversial and recommendations vary from initially non-operative to aggressive surgical management. Several factors are responsible for this life-threatening event, which has led to more individualized treatment ensuring adequate pleuromediastinal drainage with sufficient irrigation. We analyzed our data, evaluating morbidity and mortality in this selective approach. METHODS: During 1985 to 2001, 17 of the 38 patients with esophageal perforation treated in our hospital underwent primarily a thoracotomy, wide drainage and debridement of chest/ mediastinum and enteral hyperalimentation. Twenty-one patients (55%) initially were treated non-operatively (NPO, nasogastric tube, hyperalimentation, antibiotics and chest tube), but surgery was required in 9 patients (43%). RESULTS: Most perforations were iatrogenic (45%; 17/38) followed by spontaneous perforations (32%; 12/38). Cervical perforations were managed earlier (< 24 h) than thoracic tears, 8/10 (80%) and 17/28 (61%) respectively. Initial conservative treatment failed in all spontaneous ruptures and more in thoracic lesions (62%) than in cervical lesions (13%). Most patients with thoracic perforations and 'free' intrathoracic contamination underwent primary surgery. Surgery with adequate drainage (n = 23) was based on signs of sepsis, empyema and progression of pneumomediastinum/thorax. Mortality occurred in one patient (3%), initially treated conservatively. Median intensive care and duration of hospitalization were not different between the conservative (5 and 7 days, respectively) and the primary surgical approach (21 and 27 days, respectively), but were higher after secondary surgery (13 and 50 days, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Spontaneous esophageal perforations require early surgical exploration with drainage and irrigation of mediastinum and pleural cavity, while most iatrogenic lesions can be managed conservatively. Cervical perforations can be treated adequately non-operatively, but thoracic perforations often require surgical intervention.

Adolescent↗