SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “PLACEBOS”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

SourceResearch connectionFrom yearThrough year

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 361 records · Page 20Linked to original sources

PubMed2026

The glucagon and GLP-1 receptor dual agonist DD01 for metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease and steatohepatitis (DD01-DN-02): 12-week results from a randomised, double-blind, multicentre, placebo-controlled, phase 2 trial.

BACKGROUND: Metabolic dysfunction-associated steatohepatitis (MASH) is a major public health problem arising in the context of metabolic syndrome and obesity. DD01 is a liver-targeted GLP-1 receptor and glucagon dual agonist being investigated for the treatment of metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD) and MASH. The DD01-DN-02 trial aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of DD01 in adults with MASLD or MASH; this initial analysis reports prespecified 12-week outcomes to assess early hepatic effects. METHODS: DD01-DN-02 is an ongoing, randomised, double-blind, multicentre, placebo-controlled, phase 2 trial conducted at 12 outpatient clinical sites in the USA. Adults aged 18-70 years with obesity or who were overweight (BMI ≥25 kg/m2) were included in the study. Patients with MASLD or MASH underwent liver biopsy and MRI-proton density fat fraction (PDFF) and were eligible if liver fat content was 10% or higher with metabolic risk factors, or if the biopsy confirmed MASH with a non-alcoholic fatty liver disease activity score of at least 4. Participants were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive once-weekly subcutaneous DD01 40 mg or matched placebo over 48 weeks, dose-escalated over 2 weeks, using a centrally administered interactive response technology system. The randomisation sequence was computer-generated by an independent statistician. Participants, investigators, study staff, outcome assessors, and the sponsor were masked to treatment assignment. The primary endpoint was the proportion of participants having at least a 30% relative reduction in liver fat by MRI-PDFF at week 12, which was analysed in all randomly assigned participants receiving at least one dose of study drug or placebo. Safety analyses included all participants who received at least one dose of study drug. Missing primary endpoint data were handled using multiple imputation under a missing-at-random assumption. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT06410924) and is ongoing but closed to new participants. FINDINGS: Between June 13, 2024, and Jan 30, 2025, 67 eligible participants were enrolled, of whom 33 were randomly assigned to DD01 and 34 to placebo. The mean age of participants was 48·4 years (SD 10·6), 42 (63%) were female, 25 (37%) were male, 57 (85%) were White, and 52 (78%) participants had biopsy-confirmed MASH. At week 12, 25 (76%) of 33 participants receiving DD01 had a 30% or higher reduction in liver fat versus four (12%) of 34 participants receiving placebo (adjusted common odds ratio 28·8 [95% CI 7·2-115·2]; adjusted relative risk 6·3 [95% CI 2·5-15·9]; p<0·0001). Treatment-emergent adverse events occurred in 28 (85%) of 33 participants receiving DD01 and 23 (68%) of 34 participants receiving placebo. The most common adverse events were nausea (18 [55%] of 33 participants assigned DD01; six [18%] of 34 participants assigned placebo), diarrhoea (nine [27%] of 33; six [18%] of 34), and vomiting (ten [30%] of 33; four [12%] of 34). Treatment-emergent adverse events led to treatment discontinuation in four (12%) of 33 participants in the DD01 group and one (3%) of 34 participants in the placebo group. Two (6%) treatment-emergent serious adverse events occurred in the DD01 group (abdominal pain and acute cholecystitis) and zero in the placebo group. No deaths occurred. INTERPRETATION: In this prespecified 12-week primary analysis, DD01 produced rapid reductions in liver fat compared with placebo, supporting further evaluation in long-term studies. FUNDING: D&D Pharmatech, Neuraly.

Humans↗

PubMed2001

The effects of orlistat on weight and on serum lipids in obese patients with hypercholesterolemia: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicentre study.

OBJECTIVE: Assessment of the effects of orlistat 120 mg three times daily vs placebo on weight loss and serum lipids in obese hypercholesterolemic patients. DESIGN: A 24 week multicentre, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial. After a 2-week single-blind run-in period (placebo+diet (-600 kcal/day; < or =30% of calories as fat)), 294 patients were submitted to the hypocaloric diet and randomly assigned to either orlistat 120 mg or placebo three times daily. Patients who completed the double-blind study (n=255) were eligible for participation in a subsequent 24 week open-label orlistat extension phase. SUBJECTS: Patients with body mass index (BMI) 27-40 kg/m2 and hypercholesterolemia (low-density-lipoprotein cholesterol, LDL-C, 4.1-6.7 mmol/l). MEASUREMENTS: Efficacy assessments included weight loss, lipid levels, other cardiovascular risk factors and anthropometric parameters. Safety assessments. RESULTS: Weight loss during run-in was similar in both groups. After randomization, orlistat-treated patients lost significantly more weight than placebo recipients: mean percentage weight loss from start of run-in to week 24 was-6.8% in the orlistat group and -3.8% in the placebo group (P<0.001). Moreover, more patients in the orlistat group than in the placebo group achieved clinically meaningful weight loss of > or =5% (64 vs 39%) or > or =10% (23 vs 13%) at week 24. Treatment with orlistat was associated with significantly greater changes in total cholesterol (-11.9% vs -4.0%; P<0.001) and LDL-C (-17.6 vs -7.6%; P<0.001). For any category of weight loss during the double-blind treatment period, change in LDL-C was more pronounced in orlistat-treated patients than in placebo recipients, indicating that orlistat had a direct cholesterol-lowering effect that was independent of weight reduction (P<0.001). Adjunction of orlistat during the extension phase in patients who initially received placebo induced a further decrease in weight, total cholesterol and LDL-C. Orlistat was generally well tolerated with a safety profile comparable to placebo, with the exception of a higher incidence of gastrointestinal events (> or =1 event in 64 vs 38% of patients). CONCLUSION: Orlistat as an adjunct to dietary intervention promotes weight loss and reduces LDL-C beyond the effect of weight loss in overweight or obese patients with concomitant hypercholesterolemia.

Adolescent↗

PubMed2003

Acupuncture versus placebo versus sumatriptan for early treatment of migraine attacks: a randomized controlled trial.

OBJECTIVES: To investigate whether acupuncture is superior to placebo and equivalent to sumatriptan for the early treatment of an acute migraine attack. DESIGN: Randomized, partly double-blind (sumatriptan versus placebo) trial. SETTING: Two hospitals in Germany (one specialized in traditional Chinese medicine and one in the treatment of headache). SUBJECTS: A total of 179 migraineurs experiencing the first symptoms of a developing migraine attack. INTERVENTIONS: Traditional Chinese acupuncture, sumatriptan (6 mg subcutaneously) or placebo injection. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Number of patients in whom a full migraine attack (defined as severe migraine headache) within 48 h was prevented. In patients who developed a migraine attack in spite of early treatment, acupuncture and sumatriptan were applied a second time, whilst patients initially randomized to placebo received sumatriptan. RESULTS: A full migraine attack was prevented in 21 of 60 (35%) patients receiving acupuncture, 21 of 58 (36%) patients receiving sumatriptan and 11 of 61 (18%) patients receiving placebo (relative risk of having a full attack 0.79 (95% CI, 0.64-0.99) for acupuncture versus placebo, and 0.78 (95% CI, 0.62-0.98) for sumatriptan versus placebo). Response to the second intervention in patients who developed a full attack was better with sumatriptan (17/31 patients who received sumatriptan twice and 37/46 patients who had had placebo first) than with acupuncture (4/31). The number of patients reporting side-effects was 14 in the acupuncture group, 23 in the sumatriptan group and 10 in the placebo group. CONCLUSIONS: In this trial acupuncture and sumatriptan were more effective than a placebo injection in the early treatment of an acute migraine attack. When an attack could not be prevented, sumatriptan was more effective than acupuncture at relieving headache.

Acupuncture Therapy↗

PubMed2002

Efficacy and tolerability of ambroxol hydrochloride lozenges in sore throat. Randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials regarding the local anaesthetic properties.

UNLABELLED: Two confirmatory clinical trials were performed to investigate the efficacy and tolerability of ambroxol lozenges at doses of 20 mg and 30 mg relative to placebo in relieving the symptoms of sore throat of at least moderately severe intensity in patients suffering from oro-pharyngeal catarrh accompanied by pain on swallowing, feeling of scratchiness, burning and urge to cough. OBJECTIVE: Description and comparison of the efficacy and tolerability of lozenges containing 20 mg or 30 mg ambroxol hydrochloride (trans-4-[(2-amino-3,5-dibrom-benzyl)amino]cyclohexano hydrochloride, CAS 18683-91-5) in relieving acute sore throat, in comparison to placebo. DESIGN: Two similar, multi-centre, prospective, placebo-controlled, randomised, double-blind trials involving three days of treatment with up to 6 lozenges containing 20 or 30 mg ambroxol hydrochloride per day. SUBJECTS: There were enrolled three-hundred-thirty-one (331, study I) and three-hundred-eighty-three (383, study II) outpatients with acute uncomplicated sore throat of at least moderately severe intensity which is not suspected to be due to bacterial pharyngitis. TREATMENTS: Double-blind treatment with up to six lozenges per day containing either 20 mg or 30 mg ambroxol hydrochloride or placebo (a lozenge with a distinct minty flavour). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The time-weighted average pain relief over the first 3 h after the first lozenge as a ratio of the baseline pain intensity of sore throat (SPIDnorm) and the patients' evaluation of efficacy and tolerability at the end of each day of the three days treatment. RESULTS: All treatments led to a reduction of pain intensity; the means (+/- SD) SPIDnorm after the 1st lozenge were 0.53 +/- 0.28 or 0.50 +/- 0.30 or 0.38 +/- 0.28 with 20 mg or 30 mg ambroxol hydrochloride or placebo respectively in study I, and 0.53 +/- 0.30 or 0.60 +/- 0.28 or 0.39 +/- 0.31 in study II; the effect of treatment was statistically significant (p: 0.0002 or p: 0.0033 in study I and p: 0.0005 or p: 0.0001 in study II, respectively, for the comparison of 20 mg or 30 mg ambroxol hydrochloride vs. placebo). The improvement with the active treatments was greater than with placebo (95% confidence interval (CI) estimates of the mean treatment differences vs. placebo were 0.08 to 0.23 or 0.05 to 0.20 for lozenges with 20 mg or 30 mg ambroxol hydrochloride, respectively, in study I, and 0.06 to 0.21 or 0.13 to 0.28 in study II). At the end of each subsequent ambulatory treatment day with up to six lozenges per day, a statistically significantly higher proportion of patients scored a higher level of efficacy for the active treatments with ambroxol hydrochloride compared to placebo. The treatments investigated were equally well tolerated. CONCLUSIONS: Sucking lozenges containing 20 mg or 30 mg ambroxol hydrochloride has a beneficial pain-relieving effect in patients with acute sore throat, superior to that achieved by sucking a placebo lozenge. While both strengths were equally well tolerated, the higher strength of 30 mg ambroxol hydrochloride did not prove more effective. The findings confirm that the previously discovered local anaesthetic properties of ambroxol hydrochloride do have beneficial clinical implications.

Acute Disease↗

PubMed2000

Multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multiple-challenge evaluation of reported reactions to monosodium glutamate.

BACKGROUND: The frequency of reactions reported to occur after the consumption of monosodium glutamate (MSG) is the subject of controversy. OBJECTIVE: We conducted a multicenter, multiphase, double-blind, placebo-controlled study with a crossover design to evaluate reactions reportedly caused by MSG. METHODS: In 3 of 4 protocols (A, B, and C), MSG was administered without food. A positive response was scored if the subject reported 2 or more symptoms from a list of 10 symptoms reported to occur after ingestion of MSG-containing foods within 2 hours. In protocol A 130 self-selected reportedly MSG-reactive volunteers were challenged with 5 g of MSG and with placebo on separate days (days 1 and 2). Of the 86 subjects who reacted to MSG, placebo, or both in protocol A, 69 completed protocol B to determine whether the response was consistent and dose dependent. To further examine the consistency and reproducibility of reactions to MSG, 12 of the 19 subjects who responded to 5 g of MSG but not to placebo in both protocols A and B were given, in protocol C, 2 challenges, each consisting of 5 g of MSG versus placebo. RESULTS: Of 130 subjects in protocol A, 50 (38. 5%) responded to MSG only, 17 (13.1%) responded to placebo only (P <. 05), and 19 (14.6%) responded to both. Challenge with increasing doses of MSG in protocol B was associated with increased response rates. Only half (n = 19) of 37 subjects who reacted to 5 g of MSG but not placebo in protocol A reacted similarly in protocol B, suggesting inconsistency in the response. Two of the 19 subjects responded in both challenges to MSG but not placebo in protocol C; however, their symptoms were not reproducible in protocols A through C. These 2 subjects were challenged in protocol D 3 times with placebo and 3 times with 5 g of MSG in the presence of food. Both responded to only one of the MSG challenges in protocol D. CONCLUSION: The results suggest that large doses of MSG given without food may elicit more symptoms than a placebo in individuals who believe that they react adversely to MSG. However, neither persistent nor serious effects from MSG ingestion are observed, and the responses were not consistent on retesting.

Adult↗

PubMed2003

Immunological and clinical effects of post-transplant G-CSF versus placebo in T-cell replete allogeneic blood transplant patients: results from a randomized double-blind study.

BACKGROUND: Immunological and clinical effects of post-transplant growth factor administration have not been well studied. This report describes the outcome and immune functions of a total of 50 HLA-matched related donor allogeneic blood stem-cell transplantation patients who received post-transplant G-CSF (10 microg/kg) or placebo. METHODS: Immune status, including number of lymphocyte subsets and their functions, and serum immunoglobulin levels and clinical status--including GvHD, rate of relapse, event-free survival, and overall survival--were determined in the patients enrolled in this study. RESULTS: Twenty-eight patients survived 1 year after transplant, and 15 patients had available results to compare immune function by randomization assignment. At 12 months post-transplant, immune parameters in G-CSF versus placebo groups showed no statistically significant differences in number of circulating lymphocyte subsets CD3, CD4, CD8, CD19 and CD56 in the two groups. There was no significant (NS) difference in immunoglobulin IgG, IgA and IgM levels, NK or LAK cell-mediated cytotoxicity levels, and mitogen-induced proliferation between post-transplant G-CSF and placebo group. In addition, the analyses of immune parameters at earlier time-points on Days 28, 100, 180, and 270 revealed that, except for LAK cytotoxicity at Day 100, there was no differences between the two groups. Fourteen of 26 patients are alive in the G-CSF arm and nine of 24 in the placebo arm. Median follow-up of surviving patients is 43 months. Four year overall and event-free survival in the G-CSF and the placebo group were 53% and 35% (NS), and 44% and 36% (NS) respectively. Bacterial or fungal infections were the cause of six of 12 deaths in the G-CSF arm (all bacterial) and of four of 15 deaths in the placebo arm (two deaths from Aspergillus) (P=0.26). Two patients relapsed in the G-CSF arm and three in the placebo arm. Four year cumulative incidences of relapse were 8% versus 13% in G-CSF versus placebo arms, respectively, (NS). Chronic GvHD developed in 14 of 19 100-day survivors after G-CSF (11 extensive stage), and in 17 of 20 (14 extensive stage) in the placebo arm. The 4-year cumulative incidence of chronic GvHD was 56% [95% confidence interval (CI) 24-88%] after G-CSF and 71% (95% CI 48-94%) after placebo; this difference was not statistically significant (log rank P=0.41). CONCLUSION: In summary, there were no significant immunological or alterations in clinical benefit of post-transplant G-CSF administration in T-replete allotransplant recipients.

Adult↗

PubMed1991

Tissue plasminogen activator in refractory unstable angina. A randomized double-blind placebo-controlled trial in patients with refractory unstable angina and subsequent angioplasty.

To evaluate the effect of recombinant tissue plasminogen activator (alteplase) on the clinical course, angiographic changes and the outcome of subsequent coronary angioplasty, 36 patients with angina at rest, despite bedrest and medical treatment including heparin, and with concomitant ECG changes, were studied. After diagnostic angiography, patients were randomized to receive either alteplase 100 mg in 3 h (19 patients), or placebo (17 patients). The mean interval between qualifying anginal episode and initial angiography was 10 and 9 h for the alteplase and placebo group, respectively. Angiography was repeated and angioplasty was performed within 24 hours. Between the first and the second angiogram, five patients in the alteplase and seven in the placebo group had recurrent ischaemic episodes, while four alteplase and three placebo patients showed signs of myocardial necrosis (creatine kinase (CK) rise greater than or equal to twice the upper limit for normal). Intracoronary clots were recognized in three alteplase patients and one placebo patient at the first angiogram, while two alteplase patients and one placebo patient showed total occlusion of the ischaemic-related vessel. After infusion, thrombi were present in four alteplase patients and one placebo patient, and total occlusion in three alteplase patients and one placebo patient. Quantitative coronary angiography showed no change in the percentage diameter stenosis of the ischaemia-related segment after drug infusion, (alteplase 67 +/- 16 to 69 +/- 16%; placebo 65 +/- 11 to 63 +/- 12%). Angioplasty was successful in 14 of 19 alteplase and 14 of 16 placebo patients.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Adult↗

PubMed2005

Valerian-hops combination and diphenhydramine for treating insomnia: a randomized placebo-controlled clinical trial.

CONTEXT: Insomnia is a prevalent health complaint associated with daytime impairments, reduced quality of life, and increased health-care costs. Although it is often self-treated with herbal and dietary supplements or with over-the-counter sleep aids, there is still little evidence on the efficacy and safety of those products. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of a valerian-hops combination and diphenhydramine for the treatment of mild insomnia. DESIGN AND SETTING: Multicenter, randomized, placebo-controlled, parallel-group study conducted in 9 sleep disorders centers throughout the United States. PATIENTS: A total of 184 adults (110 women, 74 men; mean age of 44.3 years) with mild insomnia. INTERVENTIONS: (1) Two nightly tablets of standardized extracts of a valerian (187-mg native extracts; 5-8:1, methanol 45% m/m) and hops (41.9-mg native extracts; 7-10:1, methanol 45% m/m) combination for 28 days (n = 59), (2) placebo for 28 days (n = 65), or (3) 2 tablets of diphenhydramine (25 mg) for 14 days followed by placebo for 14 days (n = 60). OUTCOME MEASURES: Sleep parameters measured by daily diaries and polysomnography, clinical outcome ratings from patients and physicians, and quality of life measures. RESULTS: Modest improvements of subjective sleep parameters were obtained with both the valerian-hops combination and diphenhydramine, but few group comparisons with placebo reached statistical significance. Valerian produced slightly greater, though nonsignificant, reductions of sleep latency relative to placebo and diphenhydramine at the end of 14 days of treatment and greater reductions than placebo at the end of 28 days of treatment. Diphenhydramine produced significantly greater increases in sleep efficiency and a trend for increased total sleep time relative to placebo during the first 14 days of treatment. There was no significant group difference on any of the sleep continuity variables measured by polysomnography. In addition, there was no alteration of sleep stages 3-4 and rapid eye movement sleep with any of the treatments. Patients in the valerian and diphenhydramine groups rated their insomnia severity lower relative to placebo at the end of 14 days of treatment. Quality of life (Physical component) was significantly more improved in the valerian-hops group relative to the placebo group at the end of 28 days. There were no significant residual effects and no serious adverse events with either valerian or diphenhydramine and no rebound insomnia following their discontinuation. CONCLUSIONS: The findings show a modest hypnotic effect for a valerian-hops combination and diphenhydramine relative to placebo. Sleep improvements with a valerian-hops combination are associated with improved quality of life. Both treatments appear safe and did not produce rebound insomnia upon discontinuation during this study. Overall, these findings indicate that a valerian-hops combination and diphenhydramine might be useful adjuncts in the treatment of mild insomnia.

Adult↗

PubMed1996

Zolpidem in the treatment of short-term insomnia: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial.

Zolpidem was evaluated in this double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled study for efficacy and safety in patients with short-term insomnia related to problems with work, marriage, family, or financial matters. One hundred and thirty-eight patients ranging in age from 20 to 55 years were evaluated for safety. Of these, 136 patients were included in the analysis of efficacy. Patients received zolpidem 10 mg or placebo nightly for 7-10 nights. Patients completed a morning questionnaire daily, reported their global impressions of therapy, and completed a Profile of Mood States (POMS) at the start and end of the study. Nine patients (three zolpidem and six placebo) discontinued before completing the study; three (one zolpidem and two placebo) due to adverse events. Compared to placebo, zolpidem significantly reduced subjective latency to sleep on all nights of treatment and patients rated that falling asleep was easier with zolpidem than with placebo (p < 0.01) throughout the study. Compared to placebo, the zolpidem-treated patients reported longer total sleep time, fewer awakenings after sleep onset, shorter time spent awake after sleep onset and better quality of sleep. All of these differences were significant during at least part of the study. No morning sleepiness or impairment in the ability to concentrate were recorded among patients taking zolpidem. Each item on the patient's global impression of zolpidem therapy was rated significantly better than that of placebo. No changes in mood (including anxiety) were detected using the POMS scale. Side effects occurred with a similar frequency in the zolpidem and placebo groups. Zolpidem was found to be more effective than placebo and was well tolerated in the management of stress-induced short-term insomnia.

Adult↗

PubMed2001

Assessment of the safety of recombinant tissue factor pathway inhibitor in patients with severe sepsis: a multicenter, randomized, placebo-controlled, single-blind, dose escalation study.

OBJECTIVE: To identify a safe and potentially effective recombinant tissue factor pathway inhibitor (rTFPI) dose for further clinical evaluation in patients with severe sepsis. DESIGN: Prospective, randomized, single-blind, placebo-controlled, dose escalation, multicenter, multinational phase II clinical trial. SETTING: Thirty-eight intensive care units in the United States and Europe. PATIENTS: Two hundred and ten subjects with severe sepsis who received standard supportive care and antimicrobial therapy. INTERVENTIONS: Subjects received a continuous intravenous infusion of placebo or rTFPI at 0.025 or 0.05 mg/kg/hr for 4 days (96 hrs). MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: There were no significant imbalances in demographics, severity of illness, or source of infection in patients randomized to placebo or either dose of rTFPI. A 20% relative reduction in 28-day all-cause mortality was observed when all rTFPI-treated patients were compared with all placebo patients. An improvement in pulmonary organ dysfunction score and in a composite intensive care unit score (pulmonary, cardiovascular, and coagulation) were also noted in the rTFPI-treated patients. Logistic regression modeling indicated a substantial treatment by baseline laboratory international normalized ratio (INR) interaction effect when only treatment and INR were in the model (p =.037) and when baseline Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE II) and log10 interleukin 6 were adjusted for (p =.026). This interaction effect indicates that higher baseline INR is associated with a more pronounced beneficial rTFPI effect. There was no increase in mortality in subjects treated with either dose of rTFPI compared with placebo. Biological activity, as detected by a statistically significant reduction in thrombin-antithrombin complexes (TATc), was noted in the all rTFPI-treated patients compared with those receiving placebo. There were no major imbalances across all treatment groups with respect to safety. The frequency of adverse events (AEs) and severe adverse events (SAEs) was similar among the treatment groups, with a slight increase in SAEs and SAEs involving bleeding in the 0.05 mg/kg/hr rTFPI group. The overall incidence of AEs involving bleeding was 28% of patients in the all placebo group and 23% of patients in the all rTFPI-treated group; a slight but statistically insignificant increase in incidence of SAEs involving bleeding was observed in the all rTFPI group (9%) as compared with the all placebo group (6%; p =.39). CONCLUSIONS: Although the trial was not powered to show efficacy, a trend toward reduction in 28-day all-cause mortality was observed in the all rTFPI group compared with all placebo. This study demonstrates that rTFPI doses of 0.025 and 0.05 mg/kg/hr could be safely administered to severe sepsis patients. Additionally, rTFPI demonstrated bioactivity, as shown by reduction in TATc complexes and interleukin-6 levels. These findings warrant further evaluation of rTFPI in an adequately powered, placebo controlled, randomized trial for the treatment of severe sepsis.

APACHE↗

PubMed1992

Antihypertensive effect of lisinopril assessed by 24-hour ambulatory monitoring: a double-blind, placebo-controlled, cross-over study.

The antihypertensive effect of the angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor lisinopril administered in a single dose of 20 mg was evaluated by ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) in a double-blind, placebo-controlled, cross-over study. Twenty-four patients (21 men and 3 women, mean age 52 +/- 6 years) with mild to moderate hypertension were included in the study and randomly assigned to two consecutive treatments with lisinopril 20 mg and placebo, each administered for 4 weeks. On the last day of each treatment, BP was assessed by noninvasive 24-h ABPM. BP was significantly lower after lisinopril than after placebo in a 24-h period (mean 24-h systolic BP (SBP) with lisinopril 120 +/- 7 mm Hg and with placebo 135 +/- 9 mm Hg; mean day SBP with lisinopril 125 +/- 3 mm Hg and with placebo 142 +/- 5 mm Hg; mean night SBP with lisinopril 112 +/- 4 mm Hg and with placebo 124 +/- 6 mm Hg; mean 24-h diastolic BP (DBP) with lisinopril 76 +/- 6 mm Hg, and with placebo 87 +/- 8 mm Hg; mean day DBP with lisinopril 80 +/- 3 mm Hg and with placebo 93 +/- 4 mm Hg; mean night DBP with lisinopril 69 +/- 2 mm Hg and with placebo 79 +/- 5 mm Hg, p less than 0.001). Mean 24-h, mean day, and mean night heart rate (HR) did not differ significantly between placebo and lisinopril treatments. Repeated-measures analysis of variance (ANOVA) showed a significant influence on SBP (p less than 0.001) and DBP (p less than 0.001) throughout the treatment.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Adult↗

PubMed2005

A placebo-controlled, dose-ranging study of a growth hormone releasing factor in HIV-infected patients with abdominal fat accumulation.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effects of TH9507, a novel growth hormone releasing factor, on abdominal fat accumulation, metabolic and safety parameters in HIV-infected patients with central fat accumulation. DESIGN AND METHODS: Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial enrolling 61 HIV-infected patients with increased waist circumference and waist-to-hip ratio. Participants were randomized to placebo or 1 or 2 mg TH9507 subcutaneously, once daily for 12 weeks. The primary outcome was change in abdominal fat, assessed by dual energy X-ray absorptiometry and cross-sectional computerized tomography scan. Secondary endpoints included change in insulin-like growth factor-I (IGF-I), metabolic, quality of life, and safety parameters. RESULTS: TH9507 resulted in dose-related physiological increases in IGF-I (P < 0.01 for 1 mg (+48%) and 2 mg (+65%) versus placebo). Trunk fat decreased in the 2 mg group versus placebo (0.8, -4.6 and -9.2%; placebo, 1 and 2 mg, respectively, P = 0.014 for 2 mg versus placebo), without significant change in limb fat. Visceral fat (VAT) decreased most in the 2 mg group (-5.4, -3.6 and -15.7%; placebo, 1 and 2 mg, respectively) but this change was not significant versus placebo. Subcutaneous fat (SAT) was preserved and did not change between or within groups. Lean body mass and the ratio of VAT to SAT improved significantly in both treatment groups versus placebo. Triglyceride and the cholesterol to high-density lipoprotein ratio decreased significantly in the 2 mg group versus placebo. Treatment was generally well tolerated without changes in glucose. CONCLUSIONS: TH9507 reduced truncal fat, improved the lipid profile and did not increase glucose levels in HIV-infected patients with central fat accumulation. TH9507 may be a beneficial treatment strategy in this population, but longer-term studies with more patients are needed to determine effects on VAT, treatment durability, and safety.

Abdomen↗

PubMed2006

Venlafaxine extended release in posttraumatic stress disorder: a sertraline- and placebo-controlled study.

This 12-week, double-blind, multicenter trial evaluated the efficacy of venlafaxine extended release (ER), sertraline, and placebo in adult outpatients (N = 538) with a primary diagnosis of posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD), as defined in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition, symptoms for 6 months or more and 17-item Clinician-administered PTSD Scale (CAPS-SX17) score of 60 or more. Patients were randomly assigned to receive placebo or flexible doses of venlafaxine ER (37.5-300 mg/d) or sertraline (25-200 mg/d) for 12 weeks or less. The primary outcome was the baseline-to-end point change in total CAPS-SX17 score (last observation carried forward). Secondary measures included CAPS-SX17 symptom cluster scores for reexperiencing/intrusion, avoidance/numbing, and hyperarousal; frequency of remission (CAPS-SX17 < or =20); and changes in Davidson Trauma Scale total score and symptom cluster scores for avoidance/numbing, hyperarousal, and reexperiencing/intrusion. Mean changes in CAPS-SX17 scores were -41.8, -39.4, and -33.9 for venlafaxine ER (P < 0.05 vs. placebo), sertraline, and placebo, respectively. Mean changes for venlafaxine ER, sertraline, and placebo in CAPS-SX17 cluster scores were -13.0, -11.7, and -11.0 for reexperiencing; -17.1, -16.8, and -13.7 (P < 0.05 both active treatments vs. placebo) for avoidance/numbing; and -11.8, -10.9, and -9.2 (P < 0.05 venlafaxine vs. placebo) for hyperarousal. Week 12 remission rates were venlafaxine ER 30.2% (P < 0.05 vs. placebo), sertraline 24.3%, and placebo 19.6%. The venlafaxine ER group had significantly better Davidson Trauma Scale total and cluster scores than placebo. Mean maximum daily doses were 225-mg venlafaxine ER and 151-mg sertraline. Both treatments were generally well tolerated. Study results suggest that venlafaxine ER is effective and well tolerated in the short-term treatment of PTSD.

Adolescent↗

PubMed2004

Placebo-controlled evaluation of direct electrical current administration for palmoplantar hyperhidrosis.

BACKGROUND: Direct electrical current (d.c.) administration based on tap water iontophoresis has been used as a therapeutic option for palmoplantar hyperhidrosis. The placebo effect of this technique has not been investigated adequately. AIM: To investigate whether d.c. administration has a possible placebo effect in the treatment of palmoplantar hyperhidrosis. METHODS: As a placebo, low alternating electrical current (a.c.; 9-12 mA, 10-15 V, and 8-10 Hz) was applied to the palms of 15 patients with idiopathic palmoplantar hyperhidrosis. The placebo effect was evaluated by inspection and sweat intensity measurements performed before and after placebo application. Patients then received d.c. treatment (18-22 mA, 40-60 V) according to the same procedure as applied for placebo. The final sweat intensity measurements of the patients were performed 1 week after the last session of d.c. treatment. Sweat intensities measured before and after placebo and at the end of d.c. treatment were analyzed statistically by paired t-test. RESULTS: The initial sweat intensity measurements of the palms, before placebo application, were 3.12 +/- 0.39 g/h on the right side and 3.17 +/- 0.28 g/h on the left side. The second sweat intensity measurements, 1 week after the last session of placebo, were 3.08 +/- 0.46 g/h on the right side and 3.16 +/- 0.21 g/h on the left side. There were no significant differences between the initial and second sets of sweat intensity measurements of the hands (P > 0.05 for both sides). The final sweat intensity measurements, 1 week after the last session of d.c. treatment, were 0.38 +/- 0.06 g/h on the right side and 0.39 +/- 0.07 g/h on the left side. CONCLUSIONS: Statistical evaluation of sweat intensity measurements and inspections revealed that d.c. administration had no placebo effect in the treatment of palmoplantar hyperhidrosis.

Adolescent↗

PubMed1997

Comparison of ondansetron and droperidol in the prevention of postoperative nausea and vomiting after laparoscopic surgery in women. A randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Women undergoing laparoscopic surgery are susceptible to postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV). Ondansetron and droperidol are useful antiemetics. This study was designed to ascertain primarily the relative difference in efficacy of ondansetron and droperidol and secondarily between these drugs and placebo in the prevention of PONV after laparoscopic surgery. METHODS: The prophylactic antiemetic efficacy of ondansetron and droperidol was compared in a prospective, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of 439 female inpatients scheduled for laparoscopic surgery. During induction of standardised general anaesthesia the patients received intravenously either ondansetron 8 mg (n=195), droperidol 1.25 mg (n=193) or placebo (n=51). The occurrence of nausea, vomiting, side-effects and the need for rescue antiemetic medication were recorded for 24 h postoperatively. RESULTS: The proportion of patients with nausea was 48%, 50% and 67% in the ondansetron, droperidol and placebo groups, respectively; with a significant difference when both ondansetron (P=0.02) and droperidol (P=0.04) were compared with placebo. Vomiting occurred in 18%, 26% and 37% of the patients in the three groups, respectively (P=0.05 between ondansetron and droperidol, P=0.004 between ondansetron and placebo, P=0.16 between droperidol and placebo). The proportion of patients given rescue medication was 34%, 28% and 49%, respectively (P=0.23 for ondansetron and droperidol, P=0.07 for ondansetron and placebo, P=0.007 for droperidol and placebo). During early recovery the patients treated with ondansetron were significantly more alert than after droperidol. Serious side-effects were not observed. Headache was significantly more common after ondansetron than after droperidol treatment. CONCLUSIONS: The efficacy of prophylactic ondansetron and droperidol in reducing postoperative nausea associated with laparoscopic surgery in female inpatients was similar, but ondansetron appeared to be slightly more efficient than droperidol in preventing vomiting. Ondansetron and droperidol were both significantly better than placebo in the prophylaxis of PONV.

Adolescent↗

PubMed2002

The upper GI safety and tolerability of oral alendronate at a dose of 70 milligrams once weekly: a placebo-controlled endoscopy study.

OBJECTIVE: Alendronate (10 mg daily) has been shown in long term clinical trials to be an effective treatment for postmenopausal osteoporosis. A weekly dosing regimen of alendronate is preferred by both patients and physicians, as it has the potential to provide greater convenience and enhance compliance. In a 1-yr clinical trial, alendronate (70 mg once weekly) was equally efficacious and at least as well tolerated as the 10-mg daily dose in the treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis, despite the higher unit dosage required. We conducted a randomized, double blind, placebo- and active-controlled endoscopy study to confirm the results of this clinical trial. We hypothesized that mean endoscopic gastric erosion scores would be similar in subjects receiving alendronate (70 mg once weekly) and those receiving a placebo. METHODS: Two hundred seventy-seven subjects (90 men and 187 women) were randomized to one of three treatment groups: 1) alendronate (70 mg once weekly) for 10 wk (N = 126), 2) placebo (once weekly) for 10 wk (N = 126), or 3) placebo (once weekly) for 10 wk followed by aspirin (650 mg q.i.d.) for the last week as the positive control (N = 25). Esophagogastroduodenoscopy was performed 5 to 7 days after the last dose of alendronate or matching placebo. RESULTS: The mean gastric erosion scores (Lanza scale) were similar in subjects given alendronate (70 mg once weekly) and those given a placebo (0.32 vs 0.35, respectively; 95% CI for difference = -0.22-0.16, p = 0.75), whereas scores in both groups were significantly lower than in those given aspirin (3.09; p < 0.001). Endoscopic gastroduodenal ulcers occurred in no alendronate (0%), two placebo (1.7%), and five aspirin (23.8%) subjects. The mean erosion scores in the esophagus and duodenum of alendronate and placebo subjects were also similar. The incidences of upper GI symptoms were similar in the alendronate and placebo subjects and did not suggest a relationship with endoscopic lesions. CONCLUSIONS: Alendronate (70 mg once weekly) was not associated with any increase in endoscopic lesions in the upper GI tract relative to a placebo.

Administration, Oral↗

PubMed1988

Nifedipine in acute myocardial infarction: an assessment of left ventricular function, infarct size, and infarct expansion. A double blind, randomised, placebo controlled trial.

The influence of nifedipine on left ventricular ejection fraction, infarct size, and infarct expansion was studied in a prospective, double blind, randomised, placebo controlled trial in 132 patients with low risk acute myocardial infarction of less than 12 hours duration, defined by an initial left ventricular ejection fraction greater than 35% and clinical Killip class of less than or equal to II. Sixty four patients were assigned to nifedipine 120 mg/day and 68 to placebo. Treatment was started on average (SEM) 8.0 (0.2) hours after onset of pain and continued for six weeks. Gated blood pool scans, thallium scans, and cross sectional echocardiograms were performed before treatment and at 10 days. There were no significant differences between the two groups in age, sex, cardiac risk factors, or use of other medications. Mean (SEM) global left ventricular ejection fraction was not different before treatment (nifedipine group 53 (2%), placebo group 55 (2%) and did not differ at 10 days (nifedipine group 54 (2%), placebo group 52 (2%). There were also no differences in regional wall motion or regional ejection fractions. Thallium defects quantified by computer analysis were similar in both groups before treatment (nifedipine 7.8 (0.7), placebo 7.9 (0.7)) and at 10 days (nifedipine 5.3 (0.7) placebo 5.3 (0.7)). In the subgroup of patients with transmural infarction who had good quality echocardiograms and serial studies (n = 30), there was no difference in mean (SEM) baseline infarct segment lengths between the two groups (nifedipine 70 (4) mm, placebo 65 (4) mm); however, the nifedipine group demonstrated no significant change in infarct segment length between the initial and 10 day studies ( + 0.6 (3) mm) while there was a significant increase in the infarct segment length in the placebo group (+ 7.8 (4) mm). The infarct segment length increased by >/= 1 cm in seven (47%) placebo patients but in only one (7%) nifedipine patient. The nifedipine group had a significant initial 10% decrease in mean arterial pressure whereas there was no change in the in the placebo group; this blood pressure difference persisted for 10 days. Thus although the early administration of nifedipine has no detectable effect on clinical outcome and infarction size, it may reduce early infarct expansion via an afterload reduction mechanism in patients with transmural infarction. These initial results must be interpreted with caution and need to be confirmed in a larger trial.

Adult↗

PubMed1994

Failure of epoprostenol (prostacyclin, PGI2) to inhibit platelet aggregation and to prevent restenosis after coronary angioplasty: results of a randomised placebo controlled trial.

OBJECTIVE: To study the effect of epoprostenol (prostacyclin, PGI2) given before, during, and for 36 h after coronary angioplasty on restenosis at six months and to evaluate the transcardiac gradient of platelet aggregation before and after percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA) in treated and placebo groups. DESIGN: Double blind placebo controlled randomised study. PATIENTS: 135 patients with successful coronary angioplasty. METHODS: Intravenous infusion of PGI2 (4 ng/kg/ml) or buffer was started before balloon angioplasty and continued for 36 hours. Platelet aggregation was measured in blood from the aorta and coronary sinus before and after PTCA in each group. Routine follow up was at six months with repeat angiography and there was quantitative assessment of all angiograms (those undertaken within the follow up period and at routine follow up). PRESENTATION OF RESULTS: Restenosis rates in treated and placebo groups determined according to the National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute definition IV. Comparison at follow up between the effect of treatment on mean absolute luminal diameter and mean absolute follow up diameter in the placebo group. Comparison of acute gain and late loss between groups. RESULTS: Of 125 patients available for assessment 23 were re-admitted because of angina within the follow up period. Quantitative angiography showed restenosis in 15 (10 in the PGI2 group and five in the placebo group). Of 105 patients evaluated at six month angiography there was restenosis in nine more in the PGI2 group and 18 more in the placebo group. Total restenosis rates (for patients) were 29.2% for PGI2 and 38.3% for placebo (NS). The mean absolute gain in luminal diameter was 1.84 (0.76) mm in the PGI2 group and 1.58 (0.56) mm in the placebo group (p = 0.04); the late loss in the PGI2 group was also greater (0.65 (0.94) mm vs 0.62 (0.89) mm (NS) and there was no significant difference in final luminal diameter at follow up between the two groups (1.83 (0.88) mm v 1.59 (0.60) mm). The transcardiac gradient of quantitative platelet aggregation increased after PTCA in both groups, indicating that PGI2 in this dose did not affect angioplasty-induced platelet activation. Mean (SD) platelet activation indices in the PGI2 group were pre PTCA aorta 8.4 (4.1) v coronary sinus 8.8 (4.0) (p = 0.001) and post PTCA aorta 8.9(3.0) v coronary sinus 12.9 (5.7) (p = 0.001). In the placebo group the values were pre PTCA aorta 7.6 (3.3) v coronary sinus 7.4 (3.6) (p = 0.001) and post PTCA aorta 7.6(2.8) v coronary sinus 11.2(4.3) (p = 0.001). CONCLUSION: The dose of PGI2 given was designed to limit side effects and as a short-term infusion did not significantly decrease the six month restenosis rate after PTCA. The sample size, which was determined by the original protocol and chosen because of the potency of the agent being tested, would have detected only a 50% reduction in restenosis rate. There was, however, no effect in the treated patients on the increased platelet aggregation seen in placebo group as a result of angioplasty. Angioplasty is a powerful stimulus to blood factor activation. Powerful agents that prevent local platelet adhesion and aggregation are likely to be required to reduce restenosis.

Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary↗