Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “MAMMOGRAPHY”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 361 records · Page 20Linked to original sources
PubMed1995

Physicists in mammography--a historical perspective.

Medical physicists and engineers, working with radiologists and technologists, have made significant contributions in the design of mammographic x-ray units and image receptors, as well as in the development of methods for evaluating mammographic image quality and procedures for quality control. More accurate methods of measuring radiation exposure in the energy range of mammography and more relevant calculations of radiation dose to breast tissue at risk have also been realized. This article will discuss some of the major contributions made by medical physicists for the benefit of mammography. Contributions of radiologists in mammography have been published elsewhere [Bassett, Gold, and Kimme-Smith (1994)]. All contributions cited in this article are based on referenced publications and citations in the following: Medical Physics; Radiology; NCRP Report No. 85; Quality Determinants in Mammography; AAPM Report No. 29; Reduced Dose Mammography, W. W. Logan and E. P. Muntz (editors); RSNA Categorical Course: Technical Aspects of Breast Imaging, A. Haus and M. Yaffe (editors); Film Processing in Medical Imaging, A. G. Haus (editor); Screen-Film Mammography: Imaging Considerations in Medical Physics, G. T. Barnes and G. Donald Frey (editors). The article is divided into six sections: (1) x-ray equipment and receptor development, (2) image quality, (3) radiation dose, (4) phantoms, (5) quality assurance, (6) digital mammography, and (7) reports and committees.

Biophysics↗
PubMed1992

Discomfort and pain during mammography: description, prediction, and prevention.

OBJECTIVE: To identify the nature of pain and discomfort experienced during mammography and how it can be ameliorated. DESIGN: Questionnaire survey before invitation for mammography and immediately after mammography. Responses before screening were related to experience of discomfort. SETTING: Health district in South East Thames region. SUBJECTS: 1160 women aged 50-64 invited routinely for screening; 774 completed first questionnaire, of whom 617 had mammography. 597 completed the second questionnaire. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Reported discomfort and pain, comparisons of discomfort with that experienced during other medical procedures, qualitative description of pain with adjective checklist. RESULTS: 35% (206/597) of the women reported discomfort and 6% (37/595) pain. 10 minutes after mammography these figures were 4% (24/595) and 0.7% (4/595) respectively. More than two thirds of women ranked having a tooth drilled, having a smear test, and giving blood as more uncomfortable than mammography. The most important predictor of discomfort was previous expectation of pain (discomfort was reported by 21/32 (66%) women who expected pain and 186/531 (35%) who did not). Discomfort had little effect on satisfaction or intention to reattend. CONCLUSIONS: The low levels of reported pain and discomfort shortly after mammography and the favourable comparisons with other investigations suggest that current procedures are acceptable. Since two thirds of the women experienced less pain than expected health education and promotion must ensure that accurate information is made available and publicized.

Female↗
PubMed1999

Trends in mammography 1991-96 and the impact of nationwide screening in The Netherlands.

OBJECTIVES: To investigate the impact of the population based breast screening programme on total uptake of mammography in the Netherlands. SETTING: The Netherlands; breast screening programme for women aged 50-69; 21,820 women who participated in the 1991-96 Health Interview Survey (HIS). METHODS: HIS data linked to data related to the start of the screening programme in different municipalities investigating mammography use, reasons for mammography, and further assessment procedures. RESULTS: Among women aged 50-69 the percentage who had recently undergone mammography (in the year of the HIS or two years before) increased from 20% in 1991 to 70% in 1996, which was entirely due to screening. The percentage of women in this age group who had had a recent clinical mammogram (outside the screening programme) varied between 8 and 12% and did not change significantly in municipalities without screening. There was no change in the uptake of mammography among women under 50 years of age. Among women over 70 there was only a small increase in this percentage from 6 to 13%, partially due to screening mammograms. In municipalities in which screening had started, precaution is mentioned as a reason for a recent clinical mammogram among women aged less than 70 more often than in municipalities without screening. Furthermore, mammography performed because of complaints is mentioned less in all age groups after the introduction of screening. After a clinical mammogram, further assessment procedures (cytology/needle biopsies 8%, biopsies 10%) were considered necessary about 10 times more often than after a screening mammogram. CONCLUSIONS: Although the screening programme has almost no impact on the frequency of mammography in women who underwent a clinical mammogram, there has been a shift in reasons for these mammograms more towards reasons of prevention. Screening mammograms lead to a much smaller percentage of additional examinations than do clinical mammograms.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2000

Implementation of service screening with mammography in Sweden: from pilot study to nationwide programme.

Establishment of mammography screening in Sweden has progressed logically from pilot study through clinical trials to service screening. Screening with mammography for early detection of breast cancer has been provided by all Sweden's 26 county councils since 1997. It took 23 years from the initial pilot study through clinical trials to the establishment of mammography service screening throughout Sweden. In the screening rounds completed by 1995-96, and provided by all but one county council, 1040000 women participated, corresponding to 81% of those invited. The national average recall rate was 2.2%, and consequently 23000 women were recalled for additional investigations. Eleven county councils invited women aged 40-74, six invited women aged 50-69, the remaining eight invited women between both these age intervals. Mammography outside screening programmes-clinical mammography-is available throughout Sweden. About 100000 women a year were referred for clinical mammography and about 50% of these were either younger or older than those invited for screening. A negative relation between the use of clinical mammography and participation in the screening programmes was noticed.

Adult↗
PubMed1991

Mammography in a mobile setting: remaining barriers.

This study examined the barriers to undergoing mammography perceived by a group of women with ready access to reduced-cost screening mammography in a mobile van at the workplace. The subject sample comprised women who made appointments for mammography at the Susan G. Komen Mobile Breast Center in Dallas. Women who underwent mammography and women who made appointments but did not undergo the examination were asked to complete a survey examining potential barriers to undergoing mammography. The group of patients surveyed were, as a whole, well educated, affluent, less than 50 years of age, and knowledgeable about breast cancer. Compliant women were more likely to have previously undergone mammography (P less than .001), to have been influenced by their physician's advice to undergo mammography (P less than .005), and to be influenced by the media than were noncompliant women (P less than .005). These findings may be useful in developing strategies to increase mammographic screening in a self-referred population.

Female↗
PubMed1999

Diagnosis of breast cancer: contribution of US as an adjunct to mammography.

PURPOSE: To determine the value of ultrasonography (US) as an adjunct to mammography for the diagnosis of breast cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In a 2-year prospective study, 4,811 mammograms were classified according to level of suspicion of malignancy. Targeted US was performed to analyze (a) circumscribed lesions, possibly cysts; (b) palpable lesions visible at mammography; (c) palpable lesions not visible at mammography; and (d) nonpalpable lesions visible at mammography. After US was performed in 1,103 cases (23%), cases were reclassified for level of suspicion. RESULTS: In 338 cases, breast cancer was diagnosed. The sensitivity of mammography for all 4,811 cases was 83%; the specificity was 97%. After US, the combined sensitivity increased to 91%, with a specificity of 98%. The increase was significant (P < .001). The increase in sensitivity was highest among women younger than 50 years. The positive predictive value for mammography was high (72%), which reflects a high threshold for biopsy; this may have augmented the yield of US. CONCLUSION: The use of US as an adjunct to mammography resulted in an increase in diagnostic accuracy. Its contribution to the diagnosis of breast cancer in this study was 7.4%.

Adult↗
PubMed2000

Rates and correlates of discomfort associated with mammography.

PURPOSE: To explore the rates and correlates of discomfort at mammography in asymptomatic women aged 50-74 years from six San Diego, Calif, mammography facilities. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Subjects (N = 1,800) completed a 43-item telephone interview approximately 3 weeks after screening mammography. Bivariate associations between variables were analyzed with chi(2) analysis. Logistic regression was used to assess the independent predictors of discomfort at mammography while controlling for all other factors. RESULTS: Nine hundred thirty-three (52%) women reported moderate to extreme discomfort at mammography. Discomfort was not related to the intention to undergo future mammography (P =.95). Factors that were significantly associated with discomfort in multivariate analyses were facility (P <.001), satisfaction with care (P <.04), and perception of the technologist's "roughness" (P <.001). CONCLUSION: Discomfort, although not related to the intention to undergo future mammography, had a relatively high incidence.

Aged↗
PubMed2005

Effect of direct mail as a population-based strategy to increase mammography use among low-income underinsured women ages 40 to 64 years.

Women with inadequate health insurance have lower mammography rates than the general population. Finding successful strategies to enroll eligible women is an ongoing challenge for the National Breast and Cervical Cancer Early Detection Program. To test the effectiveness of a population-based strategy to increase mammography utilization among low-income underinsured women ages 40 to 64 years, a randomized trial was conducted to assess the effect of two mailed interventions on mammography utilization through Sage, the National Breast and Cervical Cancer Early Detection Program in Minnesota. Women (N = 145,467) ages 40 to 63 years [mean (SD), 49.7 (6.8)] with estimated household incomes below 50,000 US dollars (47.9% were < 35,000 US dollars) from a commercial database were randomized to three groups: Mail, Mail Plus Incentive, or Control. Both the Mail and the Mail Plus Incentive groups received two simple mailings prompting them to call a toll-free number to access free mammography services. The Mail Plus Incentive intervention offered a small monetary incentive for a completed mammogram. After 1 year, both intervention groups had significantly higher Sage mammography rates than the Controls, and the Mail Plus Incentive group had a significantly higher rate than the Mail group. The Mail and Mail Plus Incentive interventions were estimated to produce increases in Sage screening rates of 0.23% and 0.75%, respectively, beyond the composite Control rate of 0.83%. Direct mail is an effective strategy for increasing mammography use through Sage. Coupling direct mail with an incentive significantly enhances the intervention's effectiveness. Direct mail should be considered as a strategy to increase mammography use among low-income, medically underserved women.

Adult↗
PubMed1998

The impact of a physician intervention program on older women's mammography use.

The Mammography Optimum Referral Effort (MORE) is a physician office-based intervention program initiated by the Connecticut Peer Review Organization (CPRO) to increase mammography use among older women in Connecticut. Three locales in the state were targeted for the MORE intervention based on identified low mammography rates in women aged 65 years and older. Thirty-seven physicians participated from March 1, 1996, to August 31, 1996. Annual mammography rates were derived by merging Medicare Part B mammography claims with a database from the Connecticut Tumor Registry. This strategy allowed us to exclude women with a prior history of breast cancer from the analysis, in order to estimate screening rates. The MORE intervention was associated with an absolute increase of 5.9%, which represents a relative increase of 15.4%, in annual mammography use. Our findings suggest that a multifaceted physician intervention is capable of increasing mammography use among older women.

Aged↗
PubMed1997

Predictors of mammography use in the past year among elderly women.

Thirty-two personal characteristics were examined as potential predictors of mammography use in the past year in a geriatric clinic. Interviews assessed demographic, health status, health service utilization, health belief, and psychological and social variables (n = 242, mean age = 76 years). Four variables were independently associated with mammography use in logistic regression analysis: age, historical mammography use, perceived severity, and perceived barriers. The inverse relationship between age and mammography use in the past year was not modified by health status, functional status, and the other independently predictive variables. The authors conclude that geriatrics specialty care does not eliminate the age-associated decline in mammography use that has been previously described. The factors associated with mammography use in this sample were similar to those that have been described in younger populations of women. Variables examined because of specific gerontologic considerations were not independently associated with mammography use in the past year.

Age Factors↗
PubMed1998

Intention to have a mammogram in the future among women who have underused mammography in the past.

This study investigated associations between confidence in one's ability to discuss mammography with health providers and to obtain regular mammograms (self-efficacy), social network members' attitudes toward mammograms (social influence), mammography experiences, and intention to have a mammogram in the next 1 to 2 years among women who were not in adherence with screening guidelines. Data were collected as part of a baseline assessment for a work site intervention study. Women 52 years and older completed a self-administered survey. Those not in compliance with screening guidelines (n = 194) were included in the analyses. Logistic regression revealed that self-efficacy and strong supportive social influences were significantly associated with mammography intention (odds ratio [OR] = 2.50, OR = 2.22, respectively), adjusting for prior mammography use. Findings suggest that interventions designed to promote mammography should build women's confidence in their ability to discuss mammography with health providers and to obtain regular mammograms. Intervention among social networks may also be an effective means of promoting mammography.

Adult↗
PubMed2006

Factors affecting mammography behavior and intention among Korean women.

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVES: To understand factors that influence the mammography experience and intention to receive mammography among Korean women using the Health Belief Model and subjective norm of the Theory of Reasoned Action. DESIGN: Cross-sectional. SETTING: Two university hospitals and one general hospital in Korea. SAMPLE: A convenience sample of 310 women aged 30 years and older who visited participating hospitals during the data collection period. METHODS: Self-administered questionnaire. MAIN RESEARCH VARIABLES: Perceived susceptibility and severity, perceived benefits and barriers, self-efficacy, normative beliefs, and motivation to comply. FINDINGS: Age, self-efficacy, and perceived susceptibility were significantly associated with participants' mammography experience, whereas knowledge, self-efficacy, perceived susceptibility, perceived barriers, subjective norm, and income were significant in predicting women's intention to receive mammography. CONCLUSIONS: The combined model synthesizing the Health Belief Model and the Theory of Reasoned Action was more effective in predicting mammography intention than in explaining mammography experience. IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING: Tailored health education and health promotion programs to promote mammography screening among Korean women should be developed based on women's perceptions and norms.

Adult↗
PubMed2002

Comparisons of tailored mammography interventions at two months postintervention.

The recent decrease in breast cancer mortality has been linked in part to increased breast cancer screening. Although the percentage of women screened once is rising, rate of continued adherence is poor. The purpose of this article is to assess the effects of tailored mammography interventions implemented prospectively in a factorial design contrasting groups receiving either (a) usual care (no intervention), (b) tailored telephone counseling for mammography, (c) tailored mailed materials promoting mammography, or (d) a combination of tailored mail and telephone counseling. This prospective, randomized study with a 2 x 2 factorial design included women 51 years and older (N = 1,367) who were not adherent with mammography at baseline. The intervention is based on integration of the Transtheoretical and Health Belief Models. Participants were enrolled in one of two health maintenance organizations or seen in a university-related primary care clinic. Baseline data were collected on mammography history and beliefs and knowledge related to mammography. Data were collected via telephone interviews using previously developed scales. The follow-up interviewers were conducted with 976 women. The sample was 41% White, 56% African American, and 3% other. Mean age at baseline was 66.5. Logistic regression indicates that postintervention mammography status in all three intervention groups was significantly better than usual care, with odds ratios ranging from 1.66 (telephone only) to 2.16 (telephone plus mail).

Aged↗
PubMed1985

An assessment of ultrasound mammography as an additional investigation for the diagnosis of breast disease.

X-ray mammography was performed on 446 patients with suspected breast disease and 23 breast carcinomas were detected of 26 (sensitivity: 88.5%) that were ultimately diagnosed in the 12-24 months' period following examination. Ultrasound mammography was used as an additional procedure in 183 patients because the radiographic findings were considered to be indeterminate and it detected an additional two carcinomas, to give an overall sensitivity of 96%. X-ray mammography identified 40 benign lesions and subsequent ultrasound mammography characterised 38 of these as being either cystic or solid. Ultrasound also detected an additional 32 benign lesions (28 cysts and 4 fibroadenomas) which had not been evident on X-ray mammography. It is concluded that ultrasound mammography is a useful complementary procedure for those patients who have radiodense breasts or indeterminate radiographic findings on X-ray mammography.

Adenofibroma↗
PubMed1986

Screen-film mammography versus xeromammography in the detection of breast cancer.

There are two common methods of obtaining high-quality screening mammography: screen-film mammography (more simply, mammography) using a dedicated unit, and xeromammography. We studied the accuracy of the two techniques in detecting breast cancer by a retrospective study, analysing accuracy of interpretation in cases where both mammography and xeromammography were performed. Seventy-six patients were considered with 86 biopsies and mammograms resulting in detection of 32 cancers and 54 benign lesions. There was no difference in accuracy of interpretation between mammography and xeromammography. The sensitivities were: mammography 0.91, xeromammography 0.88. The specificities were: mammography 0.63, xeromammography 0.75. We conclude that both modalities are comparable in detecting cancer when optimal technique and experienced personnel are used.

Adult↗
PubMed1996

The effects of health beliefs on screening mammography utilization among a diverse sample of older women.

Screening mammography is particularly effective in detecting breast cancer in elderly women. Yet, although half of all breast cancers are diagnosed in older women, statistics show that women aged 65 and over tend to underutilize screening mammography. Prior research has used the constructs of the Health Belief Model to explore attitudes and beliefs relative to breast cancer screening. Prior studies have also identified health beliefs and concerns relative to screening mammography and race/ethnicity as some of the patient-related predictors of screening mammography utilization among younger women. This study uses the theoretical framework of the Health Belief Model to explore the effects of these variables on utilization in a multiracial, multiethnic, random sample of 1011 women, aged 65 and over. Race/ethnicity, belief that mammograms detect cancer, ease the mind, and provide accurate results; concern over the radiation, pain, and cost associated with receiving a mammogram; and other independent variables were tested as predictors of screening mammography utilization. Regression analysis identified that the belief that having a mammogram eases recipients minds was the most significant predictor of screening mammography utilization. None of the other health beliefs or health concerns were significant predictors. Race/ethnicity had no direct effects on utilization nor was it a confounder in the relationship between health beliefs, concerns and utilization. These results indicate that, along with emphasizing the importance of mammograms in early detection of breast cancer, stressing the reassurance that mammography brings recipients may be an effective health education strategy for elderly women of different racial/ethnic backgrounds.

Aged↗
PubMed2006

Efficacy of a simple, low-cost educational intervention in improving knowledge about risks and benefits of screening mammography.

OBJECTIVES: To assess the efficacy of a minimal cost and involvement educational intervention in improving women's knowledge about screening mammography and to explore patient perceptions of the educational intervention. PARTICIPANTS AND METHODS: During the study period (March 10, 2005, to July 1, 2005), 1446 participants in the Mayo Mammography Health Study scheduled for a mammogram within 4 weeks at the Mayo Clinic in Rochester, Minn, were randomized to 2 study groups and mailed surveys about mammograms. The 2 groups received separate surveys; both surveys contained knowledge-based questions about mammography, but the educational intervention group survey also contained qualitative questions that assessed the educational pamphlets. RESULTS: Of the 668 surveys returned (responders), 248 (34.4%) were from the control group, and 420 (58.3%) were from the intervention group. Approximately 80% of responders had had more than 7 prior mammograms. Significant increases in knowledge about mammography were found in the educational intervention compared with the control group on questions regarding age to begin screening mammography (67.9% vs 54.4%; P < .001), recommended frequency of mammograms (86.4% vs 75.4%; P < .001), overall reduction in mortality due to screening mammography (55.2% vs 8.9%; P < .001), and proportions of women who required follow-up mammograms (35.5% vs 14.9%; P < .001) or biopsy (59.5% vs 13.3%; P < .001). Qualitative data results indicated that most women who received the educational intervention found the pamphlets helpful and informative despite having had many previous mammograms. CONCLUSION: The results suggest that providing women scheduled for screening mammograms with physician-approved educational material before their appointment significantly increases knowledge about screening mammography, risks and benefits, and possible follow-up.

Breast Neoplasms↗
PubMed1990

Is the supply of mammography machines outstripping need and demand? An economic analysis.

The number of dedicated mammography machines installed in the United States has grown explosively. It is estimated that almost 10,000 machines will be installed by 1990, whereas the projected demand for screening mammography will require only approximately 2,600 machines, if the machines are used in a moderately efficient manner. The excess supply of mammography resources raises concern from an economic perspective for several reasons. First, such a condition means that health care resources are being used inefficiently. Second, the low average utilization rate of mammography equipment implied by these results necessitates charging a high price-over $100, on average-to cover costs. This price is above the $50 usually associated with low-cost screening mammography programs, and it may impede a desirable public health trend to increase use of mammography screening. Third, the existence of many mammography facilities operating at low capacity levels is inefficient from a health systems perspective, increasing the cost of quality assurance and medical record keeping. The current condition of excess supply is probably unsustainable over the long term.

Costs and Cost Analysis↗