Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Inhalation”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 361 records · Page 20Linked to original sources
PubMed1997

Inhaled helium-oxygen revisited: effect of inhaled helium-oxygen during the treatment of status asthmaticus in children.

OBJECTIVES: To assess the effects of breathing a low-density gas mixture on dyspnea and the pulsus paradoxus in children with status asthmaticus. DESIGN: In an urban academic tertiary referral center, 18 patients, aged 16 months to 16 years, who were being treated for status asthmaticus with continuously inhaled beta-agonist and intravenously administered methylprednisolone and had a pulsus paradoxus of greater than 15 mm Hg received either an 80%:20% helium-oxygen gas mixture (HELIOX patients) or room air (control patients) at 10 L/min by nonrebreathing face mask in a double-blind, randomized, controlled trial. In all patients, baseline data, including pulsus paradoxus (determined by sphygmomanometer or arterial catheter blood pressure readings), respiratory rate, heart rate, investigator-scored dyspnea index, and oxygen saturation, were compared with values obtained 15 minutes during and after intervention. In a subset of patients, peak flows before and after breathing HELIOX or room air were measured. When clinically indicated, arterial blood gases were obtained. RESULTS: The pulsus paradoxus (in millimeters of mercury) fell significantly from an initial mean value of 23.3 +/- 6.8 to 10.6 +/- 2.8 with HELIOX breathing (p < 0.001) and increased again to 18.5 +/- 7.3 after cessation of HELIOX. Peak flow increased 69.4% +/- 12.8% during HELIOX breathing (p < 0.05). The dyspnea index decreased from an initial mean value of 5.7 +/- 1.3 to 1.9 +/- 1.7 with HELIOX breathing (p < 0.0002) and increased again to 4.0 +/- 0.5 after cessation of HELIOX breathing. In control patients, there was no significant difference in pulsus paradoxus or dyspnea index at any time during the study period. Mechanical ventilation was averted in three patients in whom dyspnea lessened dramatically during breathing of HELIOX. CONCLUSION: During acute status asthmaticus, inhaled HELIOX significantly lowered the pulsus paradoxus, increased peak flow, and lessened the dyspnea index. Moreover, HELIOX spared three patients a planned intubation and caused no apparent side effects. Thus HELIOX reduces the work of breathing and may forestall respiratory failure in children with status asthmaticus, thus preventing the need for mechanical ventilation.

Administration, Inhalation↗
PubMed2002

Formoterol as dry powder oral inhalation compared with salbutamol metered-dose inhaler in acute exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

BACKGROUND: Acute exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) are managed with increased doses or frequency of the patient's existing bronchodilator therapy. The use of formoterol in the treatment of mild acute exacerbations of COPD has been suggested; however, a comparison of cumulative doses of formoterol with salbutamol, the gold standard bronchodilator agent for this pathologic condition, is still lacking. OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study was to compare the inhaled beta2-agonists salbutamol (rapid onset, short duration of action) and formoterol (rapid onset, long duration of action), both used as needed in patients attending outpatient clinics because of mild acute exacerbations of COPD (Anthonisen exacerbation type I or II). METHODS: A dose-response curve to formoterol via Turbuhaler or salbutamol via pressurized metered-dose inhaler (pMDI) was constructed. On 2 consecutive days, the patients received, in randomized order, both of the following active dose regimens: A = 12 + 12 + 24 microg formoterol via Turbuhaler (48-microg cumulative metered dose); B = 200 + 200 + 400 microg salbutamol via pMDI (800-microg cumulative metered dose). Dose increments were given at 30-minute intervals, with measurements made 25 minutes after each dose. The maximum forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) value during the dose-response curve to formoterol or salbutamol was chosen as the primary outcome variable to compare the 2 treatments. Oxygen saturation by pulse oximetry (SpO2) and pulse rate were also measured at each assessment period. Every adverse event, either reported spontaneously by the patients or observed by the investigators, was recorded. RESULTS: Sixteen patients (2 women, 14 men) aged 51 to 77 years (most older than 65 years) participated in the study. Both formoterol and salbutamol induced a large, significant, dose-dependent increase in FEV1, inspiratory capacity (IC), and forced vital ca- pacity (FVC). There was no significant difference between FEV1, IC, and FVC values after 48 microg formoterol and 800 microg salbutamol. There was no significant difference in FEV1 after 24 microg formoterol and 800 microg salbutamol; however, the difference in FEV1 after 24 and 48 microg formoterol was significant. Neither heart rate (mean differences from baseline after 48 microg formoterol, 1.9 beats/min [95% CI, -3.4, 7.2] and 800 microg salbutamol, 3.7 beats/min [95% CI, -1.1, 8.5]) nor SpO2 (mean percentage differences from baseline after 48 microg formoterol, -0.37% [95% CI, -1.22, 0.47] and 800 microg salbutamol, -0.75% [95% CI, -1.73, 0.23]) changed significantly. However, SpO2 decreased below 90% in 2 patients after the highest dose of formoterol and in 1 patient after the highest dose of salbutamol. CONCLUSIONS: In this small, selected group of patients with mild acute exacerbations of COPD, formoterol via Turbuhaler induced a fast bronchodilation that was dose dependent and not significantly different from that caused by salbutamol. Furthermore, formoterol appeared to be as well tolerated as salbutamol.

Administration, Inhalation↗
PubMed2003

An economic assessment of inhaled formoterol dry powder versus ipratropium bromide pressurized metered dose inhaler in the treatment of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

BACKGROUND: Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is debilitating and costly to manage. A recent clinical trial concluded that formoterol, a long-acting beta(2)-adrenoceptor agonist, was more clinically effective than inpratropium bromide in the management of COPD. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to perform an economic assessment of the management of COPD with formeterol versus ipratropium bromide. METHODS: Assessment were based on the results of a previously published 12-week, multicenter, double-masked, randomized, parallel-group, placebo-controlled clinical trial comparing inhaled formoterol dry powder 12 and 24 microg BID with ipratropium bromide 40 microg QID pressurized metered dose inhaler and with placebo in 780 COPD patients. Treatment costs for study drugs and rescue medications were estimated from resource utilization and average wholesale prices. Costs were assessed with respect to forced expiratory lung volume in 1 second (FEV(1)) and patient-reported quality of life (QOL) as assessed via the St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire. Cost-effectiveness ratios were calculated for each treatment arm and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) were calculated for each treatment relative to the next best alternative. Economic efficiency frontiers were identified. Sensitivity analysis was conducted. RESULTS: Cost analysis with respect to FEV(1) revealed an economic efficiency frontier formed by placebo, ipratropium bromide 40 microg, and formoterol 12 microg at their respective FEV(1) levels, with cost-effectiveness ratios of $30.18, $53.50, and $142.04, respectively, per FEV(1). The ICER for ipratropium over placebo was $273.03; for formoterol 12 microg over ipratropium, $1611.32. Cost analysis with respect to QOL showed an economic efficiency frontier formed by placebo and formoterol 12 microg at their respective QOL outcomes, with cost-effectiveness ratios of $25.96 and $32.56, respectively, per QOL score change. The cost-effectiveness ratio for ipratropium was $69.40,which was not on the QOL economic efficiency frontier. The ICER for formoterol 12 microg over placebo was $34.51 per QOL score point. CONCLUSIONS: Formoterol 12 microg provided greater QOL outcome than ipratropium bromide at an additional cost of $554.28 per year. Further research would be necessary to assess whether the differences in outcomes, particularly QOL, observed in the short term with formoterol would lead to favorable long-term health and economic outcomes.

Administration, Inhalation↗
PubMed1990

A study of the duration of the bronchodilator effect of 12 micrograms and 24 micrograms of inhaled formoterol and 200 micrograms inhaled salbutamol in asthma.

Formoterol is a new catecholamine analogue for which a longer duration of action is claimed. We studied the bronchodilator action of 12 micrograms and 24 micrograms of inhaled formoterol compared to 200 micrograms of inhaled salbutamol and placebo, in seven patients (mean age 59.3 yr) with moderate asthma. The adjusted mean peak rise in FEV1 was +0.331 each for salbutamol, 12 micrograms formoterol and 24 micrograms formoterol, all being significantly greater than that of placebo (+0.161; P less than 0.01). The duration of action was calculated in two ways. When calculating the time for the group mean FEV1 to return to baseline, the values were: for placebo, 3.1 h; salbutamol, 4.2 h; 12 micrograms formoterol, 6.8 h; and 24 micrograms formoterol, 11.2 h. When taking the times for each treatment at which individual FEV1 values returned to baseline and then calculating the adjusted mean time for each treatment group, the durations of action were: placebo, 3.5 h; salbutamol, 3.9 h; 12 micrograms formoterol, 5.9 h; and 24 micrograms formoterol, 8.1 h (24 micrograms formoterol compared to placebo, P = 0.02 and to 200 micrograms salbutamol, P = 0.03). The second method of calculation is nearer to a patient's approach in treating their asthma (i.e. taking an extra dose when needed), and may be a more realistic method of assessing duration of action. Formoterol is an effective bronchodilator, and the 24 micrograms dose should be assessed in the treatment of nocturnal asthma. In this group of older asthmatics with a degree of fixed airflow obstruction, we suggest that doses should be taken 8 hourly.

Administration, Inhalation↗
PubMed1998

Inhaled nitric oxide and inhaled prostaglandin E1: effect on left ventricular contractility when used for treatment of experimental pulmonary hypertension.

OBJECTIVE: Pulmonary hypertension (PHT) is a life-threatening complication after isolated heart and lung transplantation. Recent work has shown that inhaled nitric oxide (NO) in combination with inhaled prostaglandin E1 (PGE1) reduce pulmonary hypertension but their influence on cardiac contractility is less well defined. METHODS: This study investigated left ventricular contractility as measured by the 'Preload Recruitable Stroke Work-Relation' (PRSW) in 24 anesthetized open chest pigs, 12 receiving in random order NO (50 ppm), PGE1 (20 microg/ml) and their combination compared to 12 controls. PHT was induced by embolization with glass beads (500 microm). Prior to induction of PHT, sonomicrometric crystals were placed on the heart to measure instantaneous cardiac dimensions. Instantaneous intraventricular pressure (micro-tip catheter) and intraventricular dimensions were recorded digitally, while intraventricular volumes were calculated from the intraventricular dimensions applying the cylindric ellipsoidal volume model for the left ventricle. PRSW was calculated from the instantaneous pressure and volume data during rapid vena caval occlusion by analysis of generated pressure-volume loops. All data were analyzed by MANOVA and corrected for heart rate (level of significance #: P < 0.05); PRSW-slope measures contractility, (PRSW-X-intercept did not change significantly). RESULTS: PRSW-change +/- SEM (in percent of initial PRSW after induction of PHT) was -14.6% +/- 4.4% versus 1.6% +/- 4.4% for NO versus Control (P = 0.004), -8.8% +/- 4.6% versus 1% +/- 3.3% (P = 0.18) for PGE1 versus Control and -5.7% +/- 4.4% versus 2.5% +/- 4.2% for NO + PGE1 versus Control (P = 0.33), respectively. In summary, application of NO 50 ppm significantly reduced left ventricular contractility while PGE1 20 microg/ml and the combination of NO and PGE1 did not. CONCLUSION: If NO is not available, the sole application of nebulized PGE1 (20 microg/ml) appears to be safe with respect to left ventricular contractility in the setting of PHT. The combination of NO and PGE1 for the treatment of pulmonary hypertension should be considered for clinical application in situations where a combination of pulmonary hypertension and decreased left ventricular function is present.

Administration, Inhalation↗
PubMed2001

Once-daily budesonide inhalation powder (Pulmicort Turbuhaler) maintains pulmonary function and symptoms of asthmatic children previously receiving inhaled corticosteroids.

BACKGROUND: The incidence of pediatric asthma has increased dramatically over the past few decades, with approximately 5% of American children affected by the disease. OBJECTIVES: To compare the efficacy and safety of once-daily budesonide Turbuhaler with placebo in asthmatic children previously treated with orally inhaled corticosteroids. METHODS: This randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter (17 centers) study included 274 male and female children (aged 6 to 17 years) with a history of asthma for at least the previous 6 months. Patients received placebo or budesonide Turbuhaler (200 microg or 400 microg) once daily for 12 weeks. Efficacy variables included mean changes from baseline in forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1), AM and PM peak expiratory flow rates (PEFRs), nighttime and daytime asthma symptom severity scores, patient discontinuations, use of beta2-agonists as breakthrough medication, forced vital capacity (FVC), and midexpiratory flow rate between 25% and 75% of FVC (FEF25%-75%). Safety was evaluated by adverse events, physical examinations, vital signs, and laboratory tests. RESULTS: Baseline characteristics were comparable among treatment groups. Percentage of predicted FEV1 at baseline was 76.6 +/- 6.9 for placebo, 77.5 +/- 7.1, and 77.0 +/- 7.8 for the budesonide Turbuhaler 200 microg and 400 microg groups, respectively. Significantly (P < or = 0.024) more placebo patients (24%) discontinued treatment because of disease deterioration or no improvement than budesonide Turbuhaler 200 microg (11%) or 400 microg patients (10%). Patients receiving budesonide Turbuhaler experienced significant improvements in FEV1 compared with patients receiving placebo (P < or = 0.015). Significant (P < or = 0.041) improvements over placebo also were observed in AM and PM PEFRs, FVC, FEF25%-75%, nighttime and daytime asthma symptoms, and amount of beta2-agonist used in both budesonide Turbuhaler groups. Adverse events were generally mild or moderate in intensity and similar among treatment groups. CONCLUSIONS: Once-daily budesonide Turbuhaler is effective and safe in children with persistent asthma previously maintained on at least twice-daily dosing regimens of inhaled corticosteroids.

Administration, Inhalation↗
PubMed2004

Eformoterol Turbohaler compared with salmeterol by dry powder inhaler in asthmatic children not controlled on inhaled corticosteroids.

The aim of the study was to compare the efficacy of the inhaled long-acting beta2-agonists eformoterol and salmeterol when added to existing inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) therapy in symptomatic asthmatic children. This randomized, 12-week, parallel-group study, performed in a primary care setting, included 156 children and adolescents (aged 6-17 years) with moderate persistent asthma. Patients were randomized to open-label eformoterol (Oxis) Turbohaler 9 microg (delivered dose) or salmeterol Accuhaler 50 microg, both b.i.d, added to current ICS. Assessments included: changes in daytime reliever beta2-agonist therapy (primary variable), total 24-h reliever use, lung function, clinic and diary symptom scores, patient and carer health-related quality of life (HRQL) and adverse events. Daytime reliever use decreased significantly (p < 0.001) from baseline by 65% and 52%, respectively in the eformoterol and salmeterol treatment groups. Compared with salmeterol, eformoterol produced a greater decrease in daytime (-0.46 inhalations/day; p = 0.081) and 24-h (-0.70 inhalations/day; p = 0.043) reliever use. The percentage of patients who did not require any reliever medication during the study was significantly higher in the eformoterol group (p < 0.05 vs. salmeterol at weeks 8 and 12). Clinic and diary card peak expiratory flow and symptom measures all improved from baseline in both treatment arms. There was a significantly greater effect in favour of eformoterol for the reduction in clinic-assessed overall night-time symptoms (p < 0.05 vs. salmeterol). Clinically relevant improvements in patient-assessed HRQL occurred during treatment with eformoterol and salmeterol, but carer-assessed HRQL was improved to a clinically relevant extent, only with eformoterol. Both treatments were well tolerated. In children and adolescents with moderate persistent asthma, add-on therapy with eformoterol was well tolerated and at least as effective as salmeterol.

Administration, Inhalation↗
PubMed2000

Inhaled nitric oxide in term and near-term infants: neurodevelopmental follow-up of the neonatal inhaled nitric oxide study group (NINOS).

BACKGROUND: Inhaled nitric oxide (INO) improved oxygenation and reduced the occurrence of death or extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in term and near-term hypoxic neonates. We report the results of neurodevelopmental follow-up of infants enrolled in the NINOS trial. METHODS: Hypoxic infants >/=34 weeks' gestation and <14 days of age were randomized to 20 ppm INO or 100% oxygen as control. Comprehensive neurodevelopmental assessment of survivors occurred at 18 to 24 months of age. RESULTS: A total of 235 infants were enrolled in the original trial. There were 36 deaths, 20 of 121 infants in the control group and 16 of 114 infants in the INO-treated group. Of the 199 surviving infants, 173 (86.9%) were seen for follow-up (88 members of the control group and 85 members of the INO-treated group), and 135 infants were normal (69 [79.3%] members of the control group and 66 [77.6%] members of the INO-treated group). Twenty-two infants had sensorineural hearing loss (12 members of the control group and 10 members of the INO-treated group). Moderate to severe cerebral palsy occurred in 13 infants (7 infants in the control group and 6 infants in the INO-treated group). Mental developmental index scores (87 +/- 18.7 in the control group vs 85 +/- 21.7 in the INO-treated group) and psychomotor developmental index scores (93.6 +/- 17.5 in the control group vs 85.7 +/- 21.2 in the INO-treated group) were not different. A total of 29.6% of the control group compared with 34.5% of the INO-treated group had at least one disability. Infants with congenital diaphragmatic hernia, enrolled in a separate but parallel trial, had similar outcomes with a higher incidence of sensorineural hearing loss. CONCLUSION: Inhaled nitric oxide is not associated with an increase in neurodevelopmental, behavioral, or medical abnormalities at 2 years of age.

Administration, Inhalation↗
PubMed2005

Combination inhalers containing inhaled corticosteroids and long-acting beta2-agonists: improved clinical efficacy and dosing options in patients with asthma.

Combination therapy with inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) and long-acting beta2-agonists (LABA) is a recognized treatment for adults with moderate to severe asthma. The introduction of inhalers containing both an ICS and a LABA simplifies treatment and improves asthma control. This review discusses clinical evidence that budesonide/formoterol and salmeterol/fluticasone are effective and well tolerated in asthma treatment. Moreover, the rapid onset of effect and long duration of action of budesonide and formoterol make once-daily dosing, adjustable maintenance dosing, and the novel treatment strategy of using budesonide/formoterol for maintenance and as needed for symptom relief, valuable treatment options for patients with asthma.

Administration, Inhalation↗
PubMed2003

Inhalation toxicity of propineb. Part I: Results of subacute inhalation exposure studies in rats.

This article addresses results from repeated 1- and 4-wk inhalation exposure studies in Wistar rats with solid aerosol (dust) atmospheres of propineb, a zinc bisdithiocarbamate homopolymer that is used as an agrochemical fungicide. Groups of 10 rats/sex were exposed nose-only to mean concentrations of 3.97, 11.24, and 21.95 mg propineb/m(3) using an exposure regimen of 6 h/day, 5 days/wk for 4 wk. Concentrations were selected based on results from a pilot study in which rats were exposed under identical conditions on 5 consecutive days for 6 h/day to mean concentrations of 10.1, 19.9, 38.1, and 78.7 mg/m(3). Both studies demonstrated that with respect to muscular effects female rats were remarkably more susceptible as compared to males. Female rats exposed to 11.24 mg/m(3) and above displayed characteristic signs of toxicity that included weakness and flaccid paralysis of hindlegs and ensuing immobilization that was considered to be the cause of emaciation and ensuing mortality in some rats. There was an apparent reciprocal relationship of concentration and the manifestation of clinical evidence of muscular dysfunction; that is, the onset in female rats exposed to 11.24, 21.95, 38.1, and 78.7 mg/m(3) was on days 15, 8, 4, and 3, respectively. In contrast, none of the male rats elaborated comparable effects up to 38.1 mg/m(3). Neuromuscular measures included leg grip strength and supplemented the clinical findings, whereas the landing foot splay was only minimally affected. Hematology and clinical pathology endpoints, including those addressing thyroidal function, were unobtrusive up to and including 78.7 mg/m(3). Lung weights were significantly increased in groups exposed to 21.95 mg/m(3) and above, especially in male rats. The microscopic examinations made in the 4-wk study demonstrated an increased incidence of intraalveolar material and enlarged, foamy alveolar macrophages at 3.97 mg/m(3) and above. Especially in female rats an atrophy of thigh muscle fibers, including increased nuclei and focal degeneration, occurred at 11.24 mg/m(3) and above. TTCA (2-thiazolidinethione-4-carboxylic acid) in urine, a metabolite and biomarker of exposure to CS(2), which is a putative breakdown product of propineb, was proportionally higher in the female rats exposed to 11.24 mg/m(3) and above. This biomarker appears to accumulate with time. This finding provides indirect evidence that the etiopathologic cause of neuromuscular changes is related to intermediary levels of CS(2). The data of this investigation suggest that the toxicity of inhaled propineb is characterized by two independent effects, namely, responses occurring at the alveolar level and muscular weakness, especially in female rats. With respect to the latter finding, the no-observed-adverse-effect level (NOAEL) of the 4-wk study is 3.97 mg/m(3). Further study is needed to clarify whether the pulmonary response observed at this exposure level is consistent with an adaptive or an early adverse effect.

Administration, Inhalation↗
PubMed2002

Once-daily budesonide inhalation powder (Pulmicort Turbuhaler) is effective and safe in adults previously treated with inhaled corticosteroids.

This 12-week, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter study evaluated the efficacy and safety of budesonide 400 microg administered once daily via Turbuhaler in adults previously treated with at least twice-daily dosing of inhaled corticosteroids. Pulmonary function (FEV1, PEF, FVC, FEF(25-75%)), asthma symptom scores, quality of life, and breakthrough medication use were significantly (p < 0.05) different in patients receiving once-daily budesonide Turbuhaler compared to placebo, and significantly (p < 0.001) more patients receiving placebo discontinued the study. Adverse events were similar between study groups. Once-daily administration of budesonide Turbuhaler was safe and efficacious in patients previously treated with inhaled corticosteroids.

Administration, Inhalation↗
PubMed2001

Helium inhalation enhances vasodilator effect of inhaled nitric oxide on pulmonary vessels in hypoxic dogs.

There are theoretical and experimental indications that the presence of He as a balance gas markedly increase the diffusion velocity of other gases contained in a gas mixture. We allowed dogs with pulmonary vasoconstriction induced by hypoxia to inhale a mixture of 5 parts per million (ppm) of nitric oxide (NO) and O(2) balanced with He (NO in He) instead of N(2) (NO in N(2)). The dilating effect of NO in He and NO in N(2) on the pulmonary artery was evaluated by determining conventional pulmonary hemodynamic parameters, mean pulmonary artery (PA) pressure (MPAP), and pulmonary vascular resistance indexed to body surface area (PVRI), pulmonary impedance (Z), and the recently developed hemodynamic index, time-corrected wave intensity (WI). The main findings in this study were as follows: 1) hypoxia increased MPAP, PVRI, Z at 0 Hz (Z(0)), Z at the first harmonics, characteristic impedance (Z(c)), the reflection coefficient (Gamma), and the first peak of WI; 2) NO in N(2) reduced Z(0) and Gamma; and 3) NO in He reduced the first peak of WI and reduced Z(0) and Gamma more than NO in N(2). The enhanced vasodilatory effect of NO in He might be associated with facilitated diffusion of NO diluted in the gas mixture with He. In conclusion, increased efficacy of NO in He offers the possibility to reduce the inhaled NO concentration.

Administration, Inhalation↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Efficacy, safety, and acceptance of beclomethasone dipropionate administered via a new dry powder Inhaler or a standard CFC metered-dose inhaler in asthma patients.

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES: The mechanical aerosol generator, MAGhaler, is a new chlorofluorocarbon-free inhalation device. The objective of this trial was to show equivalent efficacy and safety of beclomethasone dipropionate (BDP) delivered via the MAGhaler and the metered-dose inhaler (MDI) in patients with mild to moderate bronchial asthma. Moreover, user-friendliness and acceptance of the two devices were compared. METHODS: This was a double-blind, reference-controlled, 12-week trial in 171 patients with asthma receiving BDP (1,000 microg/day) delivered via either the MAGhaler or the conventional MDI. Respiratory function parameters, clinical symptoms, concomitant intake of salbutamol or fenoterol, adverse events (AEs), laboratory values, and concomitant medications and diseases were recorded. The primary efficacy parameter was mean forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1), measured after 4, 8, and 12 weeks of therapy. RESULTS: The equivalence of the two devices was confirmed (p = 0.003) on the basis of the ratios of the mean FEV1 in weeks 4 to 12. Mean (+/- SD) FEV1 (MAGhaler was 2.24 +/- 0.60 l (baseline), 2.61 +/- 0.90 litres (week 4), and 2.62 +/- 0.87 litres (weeks 4-12). Mean FEV1 (MDI) was 2.28 +/- 0.59 litres (baseline), 2.53 +/- 0.82 litres (week 4), and 2.56 +/- 0.77 litres (weeks 4-12). In total, 33 AEs occurred in 26 (30.2%) patients (MAGhaler) and 51 AEs in 36 (42.4%) patients (MDI). Most of the AEs were of mild or moderate intensity. The relationship to treatment could not be excluded for 11 AEs in 11 patients (MAGhaler) and 23 AEs in 18 patients (MDI). Three serious AEs, all unrelated to treatment, occurred in 3 patients (MAGhaler: 2, MDI: 1). There were no clinically relevant changes in other safety parameters. Most patients either preferred the MAGhaler or rated the two devices as equally acceptable. CONCLUSION: The new MAGhaler was equivalent to the standard MDI in terms of the safety and efficacy of BDP. The improved user-friendliness and acceptance of the MAGhaler over the conventional MDI represent an important advance in the clinical management of bronchial asthma.

Adult↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Comparable efficacy and tolerability of formoterol (Foradil) administered via a novel multi-dose dry powder inhaler (Certihaler) or the Aerolizer dry powder inhaler in patients with persistent asthma.

BACKGROUND: For maximum treatment compliance there is a need to provide asthma patients with devices that suit their particular preferences. The Foradil Certihaler is a novel multi-dose dry powder inhaler developed to increase the choice of devices available. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of formoterol administered via the Foradil Certihaler, or via the single-dose inhaler Foradil Aerolizer. METHODS: This was a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-dummy, incomplete block crossover, dose-ranging and pharmacokinetic study in patients with persistent asthma. Sixty-seven patients (mean 48.0 years) were randomized to formoterol 5, 10, 15 and 30 microg twice daily via the Certihaler, 12 microg formoterol b.i.d. via the Aerolizer, or placebo in four 1-week double-blind treatment periods separated by 1-week single-blind washouts. RESULTS All formoterol doses delivered via the Certihaler or the Aerolizer significantly increased FEV(1) compared with placebo (p < 0.0001). Formoterol demonstrated an onset of action of <3 min. All active treatments were well tolerated. Tremor was the most common adverse event and was more pronounced at high doses. At lower doses the incidence of tremor with the Certihaler was similar to that observed with placebo or the Aerolizer. The pharmacokinetic evaluation comprised 41 patients (mean 45.9 years). Urinary excretion of unchanged formoterol and total formoterol increased with dose delivered via the Certihaler. The optimum dose of formoterol via the Certihaler was 10 microg. CONCLUSION: Delivery of formoterol via the Certihaler or Aerolizer combines rapid relief with enduring control and provides convenient bronchodilation in patients with persistent asthma.

Administration, Inhalation↗
PubMed1988

Inhaled metaproterenol is superior to inhaled cromolyn in protecting against cold-air-induced bronchospasm.

Eucapneic hyperventilation of cold air (EHCA) provokes bronchospasm in asthmatics. Although inhaled cromolyn powder and sympathomimetic solutions have attenuated the bronchospasm induced by EHCA, comparison of both drugs in solution has not been performed. We performed a prospective double-blind study comparing cromolyn solution, metaproterenol solution, and placebo (normal saline) given prior to EHCA. Eight asthmatics defined by a 20% reduction in forced expiratory volume in 1s (FEV1) after EHCA consented to the study. Patients were tested on 3 separate occasions at a similar time of day. Each session began with a determination of FEV1 followed by a randomized double-blind treatment. A repeat FEV1 (pre-EHCA) was performed 20 min after drug inhalation. Twelve minutes of EHCA was performed consisting of 4 min of tidal breathing, 4 min of eucapneic hyperventilation (60-70% of the predicted MVV) and a final 4 min of tidal breathing. FEV1 was performed immediately, 5 min, and 10 min after EHCA. The lowest value was defined as the post-EHCA FEV1. The pre-EHCA FEV1 was significantly larger after metaproterenol pretreatment compared to the pre-EHCA FEV1 following cromolyn (p = 0.01) and saline (p = 0.04). Metaproterenol pretreatment had a significant protective effect in comparison to placebo pretreatment (p less than 0.01). No other paired comparisons (cromolyn vs. placebo, cromolyn vs. metaproterenol) achieved statistical significance at a 0.05 level. In conclusion, metaproterenol is superior to cromolyn in protecting against cold-air-induced bronchospasm.

Administration, Inhalation↗
PubMed1995

Repeated inhalation challenge with exogenous and endogenous histamine released by acetaldehyde inhalation in asthmatic patients.

We previously reported that inhaled acetaldehyde, a metabolite of ethanol and a main factor in alcohol-induced asthma, causes bronchoconstriction indirectly through endogenously released histamine in asthmatic subjects. No study has examined the difference between tachyphylaxis in response to endogenous as opposed to exogenous histamine. Therefore, we examined tachyphylaxis occurring in response to repeated inhalation of histamine or acetaldehyde in nine asthmatic subjects. The mean acetaldehyde concentration causing a 20% decrease in FEV1 increased significantly from 18.4 (geometric standard error of the mean (GSEM = 0.14) to 45.2 (GSEM = 0.14) mg/ml over a period of 1 h (p < 0.002), whereas the mean histamine concentrations causing a 20% decrease in FEV1 were identical. No correlations were observed between the change in bronchial responsiveness to each solution and the change in baseline FEV1. These results suggest that tachyphylaxis in response to histamine is observed only when the latter is released endogenously. We believe that this is the first report suggesting tachyphylaxis caused by endogenous histamine.

Acetaldehyde↗
PubMed1995

Interaction of inhaled beta 2 agonist and inhaled corticosteroid on airway responsiveness to allergen and methacholine.

Regular treatment with salbutamol increases airway responsiveness to allergen but not to methacholine and produces tolerance to the bronchoprotective effect of salbutamol. The current study addresses the effect of inhaled corticosteroid on these aspects of regular beta 2 agonist use. A group of 13 atopic asthmatic subjects free from all asthma medications and remote from allergen exposure were studied. We used a double-blind, random-order, crossover study to compare four 1-wk treatment periods with > or = 1 wk washout: placebo, salbutamol, 200 micrograms four times per day, budesonide, 400 micrograms four times per day, and the combination of salbutamol and budesonide. We measured the methacholine PC20 and the methacholine dose shift produced acutely by 200 micrograms salbutamol after 7 d and the allergen PC15 after 8 d treatment. Blinded medications were withheld for 8 to 10 h before measurements. The methacholine PC20 was not affected by regular salbutamol but increased significantly (p < 0.014) after both budesonide-containing regimens. Neither the dose shift nor its significant reduction by regularly used beta 2 agonist were influenced by the inhaled corticosteroid. The four allergen PC15 values were significantly different from each other. Compared with placebo, the allergen PC15 was 0.6 doubling doses lower after salbutamol (p = 0.021) and 1.3 doubling doses higher after budesonide (p < 0.001); the allergen PC15 was reduced by 0.53 doubling doses from this new baseline (p = 0.039) when salbutamol and budesonide were used together.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Administration, Inhalation↗
PubMed1991

A three-month comparison of twice daily inhaled formoterol versus four times daily inhaled albuterol in the management of stable asthma.

We compared the efficacy of inhaled formoterol, a long-acting beta 2-agonist, with inhaled albuterol in 145 stable adult asthmatics in a 12-wk multicenter trial. Patients were allocated in randomized double-blind fashion to maintenance therapy with either formoterol 12 micrograms twice a day or albuterol 200 micrograms four times a day in addition to their other asthma medications. Patients were allowed to use "rescue" 100-micrograms albuterol puffs on an as-needed basis. Mean baseline FEV, in the morning before bronchodilator was 2.14 +/- 0.76 L and 1.98 +/- 0.71 L for the formoterol and albuterol groups, respectively, these values being used as baseline covariates in subsequent analysis of predrug and postdrug FEV1. Measured at each clinic visit, morning predrug FEV1 rose significantly with formoterol treatment and was significantly greater at all visits than in the albuterol group, the greatest difference being in Week 8 (2.40 +/- 0.77 versus 1.92 +/- 0.66 L, p less than 0.001). Morning FEV1 30 min postdrug was significantly higher in the formoterol group at Weeks 2 and 8, the trend not reaching statistical significance at other times. Diurnal variation in prebronchodilator peak flow rates was significantly reduced in the formoterol group throughout the trial (17 versus 42 L/min at Week 12, p less than 0.0001). The number of asthma episodes per week was significantly less in the formoterol group during Weeks 4, 8, and 12 as were the number of sleep disruptions during Weeks 2, 4, 6, 8, and 12. Significantly more rescue albuterol was required in the albuterol group by Week 2 and throughout the remainder of the study.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Administration, Inhalation↗