Probable hypersensitivity reaction to filgrastim.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
SEARCH · Search PubMed
Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.
Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
The authors performed a phase II trial of the VIG regimen (vinblastine, ifosfamide, and gallium nitrate) in patients who had advanced ovarian cancer who were refractory to cisplatin and/or carboplatin and whose disease had progressed after paclitaxel-based therapy. This was a heavily pretreated population, with five patients having received two to three prior chemotherapy regimens and six patients having received more than six prior chemotherapy regimens, with an average of 21 therapy cycles per patient. Fourteen patients were treated with vinblastine, 0.08 mg/kg intravenously on days 1 and 2; ifosfamide, 900 mg/m2 intravenously on days 1 through 5 with standard mesna uroprotection; and gallium nitrate administered as a continuous intravenous infusion at 225 mg/m2 per 24 hours x 120 hours. Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) was administered subcutaneously at 5 microg/kg/day beginning on day 7 until day 13. Five of 14 patients achieved a partial response for an overall response rate of 36% (95% confidence interval, 14%-68%). The median response duration was 14 weeks. Toxicity was primarily hematologic, with anemia and leukopenia being most significant. There were no treatment-related deaths. Further evaluation of this regimen in a less heavily pretreated population is warranted.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Kaposi's sarcoma (KS) is common in individuals infected with the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV-1). Although KS is frequently indolent, it can also be aggressive and life-threatening, especially in patients with pulmonary involvement (PKS), who have poor survival rates when untreated. In an effort to develop treatment regimens for PKS that would prolong life or reduce clinical symptoms, we used combination chemotherapy to treat 18 patients who had AIDS and PKS; 13 (72%) of them had a history of previous opportunistic infections. Doxorubicin, bleomycin, vinblastine, vincristine, actinomycin D, and dacarbazine were used in 3-week cycles with concomitant zidovudine, zalcitabine (dideoxycytidine), or didanocine (dideoxyinosine). Antiviral therapy was continued with chemotherapy. A partial or complete response to chemotherapy was obtained in 15 of the 18 patients (83%), as characterized by clearing of infiltrates on chest films and resolution of dyspnea and cough. Only 2 patients had opportunistic infections during treatment. Median survival was 9 months; patients who received dose reductions in less than three cycles of chemotherapy survived more than 1 year. Most deaths were related to unresponsive PKS. These results indicate that patients with symptomatic PKS can be safely and effectively treated with combination chemotherapy while receiving myelosuppressive drugs such as zidovudine. Such patients receive substantial relief from dyspnea and cough. Survival for treated patients exceeds survival for untreated historical controls.
PURPOSE: The Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group conducted a randomized phase II trial to determine the objective response rates, toxicities, and overall survival and to assess effects on quality of life for two combination regimens in patients with advanced gastric cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: All patients had biopsy-proven, untreated metastatic gastric cancer with measurable disease. The FHIG arm employed infusional fluorouracil (F), 2.6 g/m2, given intravenously over 24 hours once perweek for 6 weeks; infusional hydroxyurea (H), 4.3 g/m2, given intravenously over 24 hours once per week for 6 weeks; and interferon-alpha-2a (1), 9 MU given subcutaneously three times per week, once per week for 6 weeks. The AD arm employed doxorubicin (A), 50 mg/m2, and docetaxel (D), 75 mg/m2, both given intravenously every 21 days. Quality of life was measured by the FACT-Fatigue scale and a novel questionnaire assessing interferon-mediated fatigue. RESULTS: Twenty-nine patients were enrolled; 23 were eligible and evaluable. Twelve were enrolled on FHIG and 11 on AD. The major grade > or = 3 toxicities were neuromotor (46%) in patients receiving FHIG and granulocytopenia (91%) in those receiving AD. There were two fatalities in the AD arm. There was one partial responder on FHIG (8.3%) and none on AD. The median survival was 6.6 months for FHIG and 10.1 months for AD. Quality-of-life analysis did not show substantial cumulative fatigue in patients treated with FHIG. CONCLUSIONS: Neither regimen demonstrated enough activity to serve as a platform for the development of further clinical regimens against gastric carcinoma. A subset of patients receiving interferon was able to tolerate therapy without deterioration in quality of life.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
OBJECTIVES: To explore the safety and effectiveness of the individually determined application granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) after autologous peripheral blood stem cell transplantation (ASCT). METHODS: The administration of G-CSF from day +5 (arm A) was compared in a randomised, controlled trial with delayed, individually determined administration (G-CSF started when WBC >or= 0.5 x 10(9)/L and ANC >or= 0.1 x 10(9)/L or at day +10; arm B), and with placebo (arm C). RESULTS: One hundred and six patients, median age 45 (range 21-64), all with malignant lymphoma treated with BEAM chemotherapy were analysed. A significant difference in the time to neutrophil engraftment and in the duration of neutropenia <0.5 x 10(9)/L and <1.0 x 10(9)/L was observed between the arms (P = 0.04-<0.0001) with a 1-d prolongation of the median durations in arm B in comparison with arm A but a 2-4-d prolongation in the placebo arm C in comparison with arm B. The median number and range of days to neutrophil engraftment >0.5 x 10(9)/L after graft re-infusion was 10 (9-14) in arm A; 11 (9-19) in arm B; and 14 (10-30) in arm C (P < 0.0001). Engraftment of platelets to >20 x 10(9)/L and >50 x 10(9)/L was significantly delayed in the arms using G-CSF in comparison with placebo (P = 0.04-0.002) without any increase in bleeding or in transfusion requirement. There was no difference in the incidence and duration of transplant-related complications and their treatment between the arms. CONCLUSIONS: Our study has confirmed the safety of individually determined administration of G-CSF. The optimal timing of G-CSF application after ASCT in patients with good-quality grafts is shortly before expected spontaneous engraftment.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Colony-stimulating factors are widely used for bone marrow recovery after chemotherapy. Various cutaneous side-effects have been described in most cases involving neutrophils. We report the first case of lichenoid reaction at injection sites of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) in a 40-year-old patient treated for breast cancer. The eruption cleared after drug withdrawal, no recurrence was observed after drug replacement by granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor. Mainly lymphocyte-mediated lichenoid eruption to G-CSF was shown. Cutaneous side-effects to G-CSF do not share unequivocal pathogeny based on stimulation of neutrophils.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
PURPOSE: We previously demonstrated high locoregional control rates in patients with poor-prognosis head and neck cancer using fluorouracil (5-FU), hydroxyurea (HU), and concomitant radiotherapy (FHX). In two trials reported here, we added cisplatin with and without granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) to 5-FU, HU, and concomitant radiotherapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Eligible patients had failed to respond to prior local therapy (group 1); previously untreated patients with unresectable and/or metastatic disease and a projected 2-year survival rate less than 10% were also eligible (group 2). Chemoradiotherapy consisted of 1.8 to 2.0 Gy on days 1 to 5 with simultaneous infusional 5-FU at 800 mg/m2/d and HU administered every 12 hours for 11 doses at escalating doses. Cisplatin was administered at 100 mg/m2 during every other cycle. Cycles were repeated every 14 days until completion of radiotherapy. In study 2, G-CSF was added on days 6 to 13 at 5 micrograms/kg/d. RESULTS: Acute and cumulative myelosuppression limited the feasibility of adding cisplatin to FHX without G-CSF. G-CSF allowed for escalation of HU to 1 g orally every 12 hours without dose-limiting acute toxicity during cycles 1 and 2. Dose-limiting cumulative toxicity consisted of severe or life-threatening myelosuppression and mucositis. To decrease total treatment duration and, thus, cumulative toxicity, a hyperfractionated radiation therapy schedule was investigated using the established chemotherapy doses with 1.5 Gy twice daily on days 1 to 5 (75 Gy over five treatment cycles). No increase in acute toxicities was seen; cumulative toxicities remained frequently severe or life-threatening. Thirty-eight of 45 assessable patients responded. The median survival duration was 12 months for both groups. Median time to treatment failure was 8 months for group 1 and has not been reached for group 2. At 1 year, local control rates were 74% and 91% for groups 1 and 2, respectively. CONCLUSION: The addition of cisplatin to 5-FU, HU, and concomitant radiotherapy is feasible using G-CSF. The high locoregional control rate and failure-free interval justify further investigation of this regimen in previously untreated patients.
PURPOSE: To evaluate the feasibility and toxicity of the combination of full-dose epirubicin (EPI) and high-dose ifosfamide (IFO) with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) support and to determine the clinical efficacy in terms of response and impact on survival. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Forty-six consecutive, previously untreated patients with locally advanced or metastatic high-grade soft tissue sarcomas were treated with IFO 2.5 g/m2/d as a continuous infusion on days 1 to 5 and EPI 45 mg/m2/d as a continuous infusion on days 2 and 3 every 3 weeks. G-CSF 5 microg/kg/d subcutaneously (s.c.) was given on days 6 to 15 or until recovery of leukocytes after all cycles. Response evaluation was performed every two cycles and responding patients were treated with up to six cycles. All patients were evaluated for resectability of residual local or metastatic disease and underwent surgery if possible. RESULTS: All patients experienced grade 3 or 4 myelosuppression. Other toxicities were mild. The overall response rate was 52%, with a complete remission (CR) rate of 22% after chemotherapy alone. Eight additional patients were rendered free of tumor (no evidence of disease [NED]) by surgical procedures. The median overall survival of all patients is 24 months. The CR/NED patients (39%) have a significantly superior survival time compared with all other patients. Thirteen of these 18 patients (72%) are alive, nine free of tumor, with a median follow-up time of 33 months. CONCLUSION: This dose-intensive combination chemotherapy is toxic but feasible and produced a high number of partial remissions (PRs) and especially CRs, which resulted in prolonged survival.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Docetaxel has demonstrated activity in a broad range of solid tumors. Phase I trials have shown 100 mg/m(2) every 21 d to be the recommended dose. This phase I trial was designed to define the dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) and maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of docetaxel with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) support in patients with advanced solid tumors. Eligible patients had advanced malignancies and up to two prior chemotherapy regimens, ECOG PS = 0 1, adequate organ function, and gave written, informed consent. Docetaxel was escalated in cohorts of patients starting at 100 mg/m(2) on a 21-d schedule. Prophylactic G-CSF was administered on d 3 10. The DLT was defined as grade IV neutropenia >4 d, febrile neutropenia, grade IV thrombocytopenia, any grade III nonhematologic toxicity, or the inability to receive cycle 2 because of ongoing toxicity. Twenty-three patients were enrolled at doses up to 145 mg/m(2). The median age was 59 yr and the median number of prior chemotherapy regimens was 1. No DLT was observed at 100 mg/m(2), and 2 of 11 patients at 120 mg/m(2) experienced DLT (neutropenic fever and stomatitis). At 145 mg/m(2), one of eight patients had DLT (fatigue). Two of eight patients at 145 mg/m(2) had brief grade IV neutropenia (without fever), and none had grade III-IV thrombocytopenia or anemia. The docetaxel dose can be safely escalated to 145 mg/m(2) every 21 d with GCSF support, a 45% increase above the standard recommended phase II dose. Further studies will clarify the role of dose-intensified docetaxel.