Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Estramustine”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 361 records · Page 20Linked to original sources

Single-agent estramustine phosphate (EMP) is active in advanced breast cancer after failure with anthracyclines and taxanes.

PURPOSE: Estramustine phosphate (EMP) is an oral cytotoxic agent that depolymerizes tubuline, a mechanism of action that has been revisited during the last decade. Because of its lack of haematological toxicity and favourable tolerance profile, EMP is a good candidate for palliative chemotherapy. The aim of the study was to assess its tolerance and efficacy in advanced breast cancer after failure with usual regimens. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with a life expectancy of at least 12 weeks and bi-dimensionally measurable disease having received at least 1 line of chemotherapy (including taxanes and/or anthracyclines) for advanced breast cancer (ABC) were eligible. EMP was given daily at a dose of 10 mg/kg until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity or patient refusal to continue chemotherapy. RESULTS: Forty patients were included between June 1998 and December 1999. Patients had previously received one to eight chemotherapy regimens (median is two) for ABC. Twenty-two patients (55%) had visceral involvement and eighteen patients (45%) had osseous, chest wall or soft tissue metastases. Adverse events leading to early interruption of EMP were grade 2 allergy (n = 1), grade 2-3 nausea (n = 6), deep-vein thrombosis (n = 1), grade 3 sepsis (n = 1). One patient died at twenty-four weeks from pulmonary embolism, and another at fourteen weeks from unknown cause. Seven objective responses were observed (17.5%; 95% confidence interval (CI): 6%-30%). Median time to failure was 24 weeks (14-52+) in responding patients. All objective responses but one were observed in patients with visceral metastases. In 10 other patients (25%), disease remained stable with a median time to failure of 27 weeks (16-50); 6 of these experienced a decrease of consumption of analgesics or an improvement of performance status. CONCLUSION: EMP is an active drug in ABC after failure with taxanes and anthracyclines, whose tolerance profile appears favourable.

Administration, Oral↗

Induction of apoptosis by estramustine phosphate mediated by phosphorylation of bcl-2.

Estramustine phosphate (EMP) is an anti-microtubule agent that induces apoptosis of glioma cells. We investigated whether EMP caused apoptosis through the alkylating effect of its nitrogen mustard component or by phosphorylation of bcl-2 like other anti-microtubule agents in normal human astrocyte and human malignant glioma cell lines. Apoptosis was seen in glioma cells treated either with nitrogen mustard or EMP and expression of bcl-2 mRNA was not changed by exposure to the drug. An immunoprecipitation study only found phosphorylation bcl-2 in glioma cells exposed to EMP and not in cells exposed to nitrogen mustard. These results indicate that induction of apoptosis in glioma cells by EMP is mediated by phosphorylation of bcl-2.

Antineoplastic Agents, Alkylating↗

The antimicrotubule drug estramustine but not irradiation induces apoptosis in malignant glioma involving AKT and caspase pathways.

Irradiation is one of the cornerstones used in the treatment of malignant glioma. However, the effect is modest and glioma cells generally display a pronounced radio-resistance. In this study, the effect of irradiation, alone and in combination with the antimicrotubule drug estramustine (EaM), was investigated in vitro using the BT4C rat glioma cell line, and in vivo the BT4C rat intracerebral glioma model was used. Apoptosis was detected by analysing DNA laddering, in situ end labelling (ISEL) and Annexin V reactivity. In addition, phosphorylation status of MAPK, JNK, p38, and AKT, proteins involved in pro- and anti-apoptotic signalling pathways was analysed by Western blotting. Irradiation did not induce apoptosis, neither in vitro nor in vivo. EaM, however, induced apoptosis in vivo and in vitro, regardless of whether EaM was given alone, before or after irradiation. When BT4C cells were treated with the caspase-3 inhibitor Ac-DEVD-CHO prior to EaM, the number of apoptotic cells was decreased, indicating an involvement of caspase-3. The signalling pathways regulating apoptosis are complex and involve kinases such as MAPK, JNK, p38 and AKT. Irradiation did not induce any changes in the expression levels or phosphorylation status of these proteins. On the other hand, the phosphorylation level of AKT was reduced after EaM treatment, which might, in part, propose how EaM induces apoptosis in glioma cells.

Animals↗

Resistance to the antimitotic drug estramustine is distinct from the multidrug resistant phenotype.

Following EMS mutagenesis, three estramustine (EM) resistant DU 145 human prostatic carcinoma cell lines were clonally selected by exposure to incrementally increasing concentrations of the drug. Although only low levels of resistance (approximately 3-fold) were attainable, this resistance was stable in the absence of continuous drug exposure. These EM-resistant clones (EMR 4,9,12) did not exhibit cross resistance to vinblastine, taxol, or adriamycin, and had collateral sensitivity to cytochalasin B. None of the lines had elevated expression of P-glycoprotein mRNA or glutathione S-transferase activity, suggesting a phenotype distinct from the classic multi-drug resistance phenotype. This conclusion was supported further by the observation that two MDR cell lines (FLC mouse erythroleukaemic and SKOV3 human ovarian carcinoma cells) showed sensitivity to EM. Fluorescent activated cell sorting analysis of the effects of EM on cell cycle traverse revealed that at EM concentrations up to 20 microM an increasing percentage of wild type cells were blocked in G2/M; no such effect occurred in EMR lines. Differential interference contrast microscopy was employed to study EM's effect on mitosis. EMR lines were able to form functional, albeit smaller, spindles at EM concentrations that resulted in chromosomal disorganisation and inhibition of mitotic progression in wild type cells. EMR lines were able to progress through mitosis and cytokinesis at the same rate as untreated cells. Tritiated EM was used to evaluate potential drug uptake/efflux mutations in ERM clones. EMR 4 and 9 incorporate less EM than wild type cells; however, they have significantly decreased cellular volumes. The initial efflux rate constants for EMR clones were greater than for wild type cells. Within 5 min greater than 70% of the drug was lost from resistant cells compared to a 50% loss by the wild type. Although the specific mechanisms of resistance have yet to be defined, the lack of collateral resistance to other MDR/anti-microtubule agents could serve as the basis for the clinical use of EM in combination chemotherapy.

Anti-Bacterial Agents↗

Epirubicin combined with estramustine phosphate in hormone-resistant prostate cancer: a phase II study.

Twenty-four assessable patients with hormone-resistant prostate cancer (HRPC) were to receive daily doses of oral estramustine phosphate (EMP), 10 mg kg(-1), and intravenous epirubicin (EPR) infusions, 100 mg m(-2), every third week up to a cumulative dose of 500 mg m(-2). Biochemical response [> or = 50% reduction in pretreatment serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) after three cycles of > or = 3 weeks' duration] was demonstrated in 13 of 24 patients included (54%). No objective response (WHO criteria) was observed, although seven of nine evaluable patients achieved a > or = 50% serum PSA reduction. Subjective improvement (pain score, performance status) occurred in 7 of 24 patients, whereas nine patients progressed subjectively. There was no correlation between subjective and biochemical response. Biochemical progression (> or = 50% increase of nadir PSA) occurred after a median of 12 weeks. All but two patients were alive after a median follow-up time of 8.7 months for surviving patients (range 3.3-13.2). Eight patients experienced grade 3/4 leucopenia, with no indication of cumulative myelosuppression. Cardiovascular toxicity was experienced by four patients. Two patients developed angioedema twice, in one patient requiring hospitalization at the intensive ward. Based on this limited series, the combination of EPR and EMP in patients with HRPC is tolerable and appears to be effective in terms of significant PSA reduction. The results warrant further investigations of the two drugs and, in particular, of the clinical significance of > or = 50% PSA decrease in patients with HRPC.

Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols↗

Computerized detection of morphological changes to glioma cells during estramustine and ion-channel blocker perifusion.

A perifusion technique for microscopy with computerized detection of early changes in cell morphology during continuous perifusion was used to show that the geometry of cultured glioma cells (MG-251) changes rapidly when they are exposed to estramustine phosphate (EMP). When the cells were exposed to 20 or 40 mg l(-1) EMP, cell volume projected cell area (PCA) rapidly increased. When the Na+,K+-ATPase blocker ouabain (100 micromol l(-1)) was added to the EMP (40 mg l(-1)) perifusion, the acute EMP response was eradicated. When the PCA curve for ouabain alone was subtracted from the curve of combined ouabain and EMP perifusion, the resulting curve showed that ouabain completely blocked the EMP-induced increase in PCA. When the Na+, K+, Cl- co-transport inhibitors bumetanide (10 micromol l(-1)), or furosemide (100 micromol l(-1)), were added to EMP (40 mg l(-1)), the acute increase in PCA seen for EMP alone was also completely blocked. This study shows that inhibitors of ion transmembrane transport can modify EMP-induced cell volume increases. This may be of particular importance since the blockers have been found to interfere also with the cytotoxic function of EMP during cell culture. Thus, it is possible that cell volume changes could serve as a rapid technique for predicting the cytotoxic activity of antineoplastic drugs.

Bumetanide↗

Oral estramustine phosphate and oral etoposide for the treatment of hormone-refractory prostate cancer.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the antitumor activity and toxicity of oral estramustine phosphate (EMP) in combination with oral etoposide in patients with hormone-refractory prostate cancer. METHODS: Twenty patients with adenocarcinoma of the prostate that progressed after one or more regimens of androgen-deprivation therapy were enrolled into this trial. Oral EMP was administered twice daily, for a total daily dose of 560 mg, and oral etoposide (50 mg/bodyweight per day) was given on days 1-21 and was stopped on days 22-35. Treatment was continued until evidence of disease progression appeared or two consecutive rises in the prostate-specific antigen (PSA) value were observed. RESULTS: Ten of 20 patients showed a decrease of 50% or greater in the PSA value from initially elevated PSA levels after therapy. The median progression-free duration and 2 year cause-specific survival rate of these 10 patients were 208 days (range 71-693 days) and 67.5%, respectively. There were no significant differences in age, pretreatment PSA value, duration from initial treatment to relapse, prior therapy or survival between patients who had a decrease of 50% or greater in PSA values after this combination therapy and those who did not. The main toxicities (> or =grade 2) were anemia, leukocytopenia, thrombocytopenia, gastrointestinal and hepatic disorders, which occurred in 40, 15, 10, 15 and 5% of patients, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The combination of oral EMP and etoposide is considered to be a well-tolerated outpatient treatment regimen for patients with hormone-refractory prostate cancer and the therapy deserves further investigation.

Adenocarcinoma↗

Necessity of re-evaluation of estramustine phosphate sodium (EMP) as a treatment option for first-line monotherapy in advanced prostate cancer.

Estramustine phosphate sodium (EMP) was first introduced in the early 1970s for the treatment of prostate cancer, when EMP was supposed to have the dual effect of estrogenic activity and cytotoxicity. For the following decades, it was used mainly in hormone-refractory cases, with a conventional dosage of 4-9 capsules/day, which showed a 30-35% objective response rate. However, a very limited number of cases have been reported that used EMP as a first-line monotherapy in the conventional dosage. One study showed a response rate of 82%, which is at least as effective as conventional estrogen (diethylstilbestrol; DES) monotherapy. Nevertheless, EMP was almost abandoned for the treatment of prostate cancer because of severe adverse side-effects, especially in the cardiovascular system and gastrointestinal tract. Recently, two facts have become evident. First, EMP interferes with cellular microtubule dynamics but does not show alkylating effects. Second, EMP is able to produce a complex with calcium when dairy products are taken concomitantly with EMP, resulting in a decrease in the absorption rate of EMP from the gut. Many clinical trials have been undertaken without warning against concomitant dairy product intake since the introduction of EMP. This fact will jeopardize almost all the clinical trials performed before 1990. It is considered that response rates have been underestimated and better results could have been obtained because side-effects decrease dose-dependently. Low-dose EMP monotherapy (2 capsules/day) has been performed infrequently in previously untreated advanced prostate cancer. The only large trial by the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer in 1984 was biased in selecting patients. Nevertheless, the response rate of EMP is comparable to that of DES. In this study, the adverse side-effects of EMP were less than that of DES. Recently, a study was conducted at the University of Tokyo of 11 patients with advanced prostate cancer on low-dose EMP as first-line monotherapy. The study found that the mean serum prostate-specific antigen level decreased to within the normal range by day 50; mean serum testosterone, leutinizing hormone and follicle-stimulating hormone reduced to undetectable levels by day 20; and mean serum estradiol increased to a very high level within 1 week. These data implicate that low-dose EMP can suppress quickly and adequately the pituitary-gonadal axis, although the antitumor effect has not as yet been elucidated. For these reasons, it is necessary to re-evaluate low-dose EMP monotherapy in previously untreated advanced prostate cancer.

Antineoplastic Agents, Hormonal↗

A phase II Hoosier Oncology Group study of vinorelbine and estramustine phosphate in hormone-refractory prostate cancer.

BACKGROUND: The purpose was to evaluate the combined anti-microtubular regimen of vinorelbine and estramustine phosphate (EMP) in hormone refractory prostate cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Weekly vinorelbine 20 mg/m2 (or 15 mg/m2 if a history of prior pelvic radiotherapy) was combined with EMP at 280 mg orally tds for 3 days (the day before, the day of and the day after vinorelbine infusion). After 8 weeks of therapy the combination was given every other week. RESULTS: From February 1998 to February 1999, 23 men were enrolled with a median age of 69 years (range 50-83 years). The median prostate-specific antigen (PSA) at entry was 160 ng/ml (range 0-802 ng/ml). A median of 13 weeks of therapy was administered and the median follow-up was 14.8 months. Eleven patients (48%) had lower extremity edema requiring diuretic therapy, two (9%) had grade 2 granulocytopenia and four patients [17%; 95% confidence interval (CI) 5% to 39%] had a thromboembolic episode. There was no treatment-related mortality. Fifteen of 21 patients (71%; 95% CI 49% to 89%) had at least a 50% decrease in the PSA for at least 2 months with a median time to serologic progression of 3.5 months (range 0.75-10.5 months). One of eight patients (12.5%; 95% CI 0% to 53%) with measurable disease had a confirmed partial response. The estimated median survival was 15.1 months and the actual one year overall survival was 71% (95% CI 51% to 88%). CONCLUSIONS: Weekly vinorelbine with short course oral EMP is an active regimen as evaluated by rate of PSA response, time to progression and median survival. However, the toxicities of EMP, even when given as a short course, are still problematic.

Adenocarcinoma↗

Pilot study of epothilone B analog (BMS-247550) and estramustine phosphate in patients with progressive metastatic prostate cancer following castration.

BACKGROUND: Several trials have demonstrated that the response proportions to microtubule agents in patients with prostate cancer are increased by the addition of estramustine phosphate (EMP). The epothilone B analog BMS-247550 is a novel microtubule agent that has shown activity in taxane-resistant tumors. We conducted a dose-escalation study to determine a safe dose of BMS-247550 to combine with EMP in patients with metastatic prostate cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Chemotherapy-naive patients with castrate-metastatic prostate cancer were treated with intravenous BMS-247550 and oral EMP (280 mg three times daily for 5 days) every 3 weeks. RESULTS: Thirteen patients were treated at two dose levels (35 and 40 mg/m(2)). Three of six patients treated at 40 mg/m(2) developed grade 4 neutropenia, establishing 35 mg/m(2) as the maximum-tolerated dose. Significant peripheral neuropathy (grade >/= 2) was related to dose level and infusion rate. A decline in prostate-specific antigen (PSA) of >/= 50% was seen in 11 of 12 evaluable patients (92%) (95% confidence interval 76% to 100%). There were objective responses in soft tissue (57%) and bone metastasis (40%). CONCLUSIONS: The phase II dose of BMS-247550 combined with EMP is 35 mg/m(2) over 3 h every 3 weeks. This combination is safe and >/= 50% post-therapy declines in PSA were seen in 11 of 12 patients (92%).

Adenocarcinoma↗

Estramustine phosphate compared with diethylstilbestrol. A randomized, double-blind, crossover trial for stage D prostate cancer.

In a double-blind, crossover comparison, 236 patients with metastatic prostate cancer were randomized to receive estramustine phosphate (EMP) or diethylstilbestrol (DES). Previously castrated patients (66) were separately randomized. Patients kept taking their first drug until progression was proved by objective studies, at which time alternative treatment was begun. The primary determinant of efficacy was the duration between start of therapy and date of objective progression. Uncastrated patients treated with EMP had a significantly longer duration without progression than those treated with DES (p less than 0.01). The following subcategories of entry were further evaluated: little or no pain, moderate to severe pain, little reduction in activity, significant reduction in activity, presence or absence of cardiovascular disease, age above or below 70 years, and "good" or "bad" histology. For all but the last category, EMP was statistically superior to DES. Patients who underwent orchiectomy less than 3 months before randomization had nonprogression rates similar to those for noncastrated men in both groups. Secondary (crossover) therapy was less effective than first therapy in both groups: 46% of patients receiving EMP and 40% receiving DES had no progression at 6 months. Clinical and laboratory adverse experiences were similar for both drugs, except that gastrointestinal disturbances were more common in the EMP group.

Clinical Trials as Topic↗

Clinical evaluation with long-term follow-up of flutamide and estramustine as initial treatment of metastatic carcinoma of the prostate.

Thirty patients with metastatic cancers but with no serious cardiovascular (CV) conditions were randomly assigned to receive treatment either with flutamide (250 mg x 3) (F) or with estramustine (280 mg x 2) (E). Clinical examination, bone scan, laboratory measurements were performed before randomization and at regular intervals thereafter. During an observation period of between 1 and 2.5 years, F was discontinued in one case (7%) because of icterus, and E in three cases (20%) because of CV complications. Of the remaining 14 F-treated patients, 13 responded initially. Eleven of them relapsed, and five died of cancer. In the corresponding group of 12 E-treated patients, there were 11 primary responders. Of these, only two relapsed and died, as did the only nonresponder. The difference between the two groups with regard to relapse is significant (p less than 0.01), but not with regard to mortality. In the present material, there was an initial favorable response to F without signs of CV complications and with maintained libido in most cases. However, due to the significantly increased risk for relapse compared with E, F cannot be recommended as single therapy except in cases where estrogens are contraindicated or when interference with libido and potency is unacceptable.

Adenocarcinoma↗

Phase II pilot study of combined chemohormonal therapy with doxorubicin and estramustine in metastatic prostate cancer.

Twenty-nine patients with progressive hormone-refractory metastatic adenocarcinoma of the prostate were treated with daily estramustine phosphate at 10 mg/kg, and I.V. doxorubicin 50 mg/m2 every 3 weeks. Twenty-six patients were evaluable. Four of seven patients with nonosseous measurable disease had partial responses lasting 3 to 10 months. Eleven of 19 patients with osseous metastases had stable disease or improvement on bone scan, 6 of these for 7 months or longer. Median time to progression was 20 weeks, and the median survival was 43 weeks.

Adenocarcinoma↗

A phase I study of paclitaxel, estramustine phosphate and vinorelbine (Pacl-E-Vin) in advanced malignancies: triple tubulin targeting.

Anti-tubulin couplets have activity in hormone-resistant prostate cancer. This study was designed to define the dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) and recommended phase II dose (RPTD) of the unique triplet combination of paclitaxel, estramustine phosphate (EMP) and vinorelbine (Pacl-E-Vin). Patients with advanced malignancies who had failed standard therapy, ECOG performance status (PS 0-2) and adequate organ function were included. Dose of EMP was fixed at 300 mg/m2/dose p.o. t.i.d. on days 1-3 and 8-10. Vinorelbine dose was 20 mg/m2/day i.v. on days 3 and 10. Paclitaxel was dose escalated from 40 to 50 mg/m /day i.v. on days 3 and 10. Cycles were repeated every 3 weeks. Twelve adults (median age 72) were entered on this study. Primary tumors included prostate (n=7), cervix (n=2), melanoma (n=1), colon (1) and lung with synchronous prostate cancer (n=1). Nine patients had received no prior chemotherapy, one had received a prior regimen and two had received two or more prior regimens. Of four evaluable patients at dose level 1, one patient had grade 3 neutropenia leading to the day 10 dose being withheld. Of five evaluable patients at dose level 2, there was one DLT (febrile neutropenia) and two grade 3 neutropenias leading to the day 10 dose being withheld. One patient had a lower extremity deep vein thrombosis. Other side effects were mild and reversible. Nine patients were evaluable for efficacy: three with prostate cancer had a greater than 50% prostate-specific antigen (PSA) response, and a patient with synchronous prostate and lung cancer had a greater than 50% PSA response. We conclude that the DLT of Pacl-E-Vin is neutropenia. RPTD is vinorelbine 20 mg/m2, paclitaxel 40 mg/m2, both administered on days 3 and 10, and EMP 900 mg/m2/day on days 1-3 and 8-10, q3w. Dose omission at day 10 followed by 20% dose reduction of paclitaxel and vinorelbine is recommended in the event of grade 3 neutropenia. Activity in hormone-refractory prostate cancer is promising and warrants phase II evaluation.

Adult↗

In vitro inhibition of cell proliferation, viability, and invasiveness in U87MG human glioblastoma cells by estramustine phosphate.

OBJECTIVE: Several determinants of cell motility are highly dependent on the cytoskeleton, in particular, microtubules. To our knowledge, there have been no previous reports regarding the anti-invasive ability by an antimicro-tubule agent, estramustine phosphate (EMP), on glioblastoma cell lines. We investigated the modulated cell proliferation and invasiveness by EMP in vitro. METHODS: We determined the relative survival rate by cell proliferation assay and the percent survival fraction by monotetrazolium assay. Furthermore, an invasion index was used to quantify the migrating and invasive potential of the human glioblastoma cell line, U87MG, in Boiden's chamber with reconstituted basement membrane (Matrigel; Collaborative Research, Lexington, MA). RESULTS: We found that 0.5 mumol/L EMP had no effect in any of the assays. Concentrations of 1, 5, and 10 mumol/L demonstrated a concentration- and time-dependent depression in all of the assays. A range of drug concentration of EMP, 1 to 10 mumol/L, in which cell invasiveness was successfully inhibited, was comparable with antiproliferative capacity. CONCLUSION: The data add to the findings that EMP not only offers selective antiproliferative activity against glioblastoma but also reduces invasiveness, consistent with its main mechanism of action. Such findings form the basis for the development of agents that use non-DNA targets for the treatment of glioblastomas and may improve control over tumor proliferation and invasion.

Antineoplastic Agents, Alkylating↗

Tumor blood flow and the cytotoxic effects of estramustine and its constituents in a rat glioma model.

OBJECTIVE: Estramustine (EaM) is a conjugate of nor-nitrogen mustard (NNM) and 17 beta-estradiol (E2) that has cytotoxic and radiosensitizing effects on experimental malignant glioma. Its mechanism of action is only partly understood. To further investigate the mechanism in vivo, the effects on tumor blood flow (TBF) and tumor growth were analyzed. METHODS: TBF was measured by radioactive microspheres, and tumor growth was measured by weight. Apoptosis was evaluated by in situ end labeling and gel electrophoresis. The effects of the constituents NNM and E2 were also evaluated. RESULTS: EaM increased TBF to 153.8 ml/100 g/min after 3 days and to 153.9 ml/100 g/min after 10 days of treatment, compared with 94.0 ml/100 g/min in untreated controls. Cerebral blood flow did not change after EaM treatment. NNM increased TBF but also showed a tendency to increase cerebral blood flow. E2 increased TBF, whereas cerebral blood flow was unchanged. EaM resulted in a rapid reduction in tumor weight from 230 mg in untreated animals to 146 mg after 3 days of treatment. EaM induced an early transient fragmentation of deoxyribonucleic acid in glioma but not in the normal brain. Neither NNM nor E2 affected tumor weight. CONCLUSION: EaM increases TBF in the BT4C rat glioma model with a concomitant rapid antitumoral effect. The increase in TBF could partially be induced by an estrogen-like action of EaM, but the rapid cytotoxic effect of the drug is obviously attributed to the intact EaM compound. This cytotoxic effect might be attributable to the induction of programmed cell death.

Animals↗

Estramustine binding protein in human benign prostatic hypertrophy.

Using a highly sensitive radioimmunoassay (RIA) of estramustine binding protein (EMBP) with the antibody raised against rat-EMBP, the concentration of EMBP in human benign prostatic hypertrophy (BPH) tissue was evaluated. Using mechanical separation procedure, EMBP was found significantly higher in the epithelium (10.7 ng/mg protein) than in the stroma (2.9 ng/mg protein). When human BPH was classified into glandular, fibromuscular and mixed type, the concentration of EMBP was the highest in glandular type (15.7 ng/mg protein) and the lowest in fibromuscular type (10.8 ng/mg protein).

Antibodies↗

Prostate specific antigen and prostate acid phosphatase declines after estramustine phosphate withdrawal: a case report.

We report a case of advanced prostate cancer in which an initial response to hormonal therapy with surgical castration and estramustine phosphate (EMP) was followed by disease progression, as shown by sequential elevations in serum prostate specific antigen (PSA) and prostate acid phosphatase (PAP) and the development of new symptoms, during maintenance endocrine and anti-cancer chemotherapy. Discontinuation of EMP resulted in sustained reductions in serum PSA and PAP levels and a sustained improvement in symptoms.

Acid Phosphatase↗