Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “ENDOSCOPY”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 361 records · Page 20Linked to original sources

Establishing an endoscopy unit for surgical training.

Gastrointestinal endoscopy is slowly returning to the core of surgical resident training. The intent is to integrate endoscopy into the mainstream of surgical education such that it will be approached and used the same as any of the many diagnostic and therapeutic tools at the surgeon's disposal. The current feeling is that although endoscopy should be intimately incorporated into training, there is a level of technical expertise required such that a dedicated teaching experience must be provided. This education must be directed by a surgeon experienced in endoscopy; we should not abdicate this responsibility to others. The training program should be founded on education, clinical practice, and research, with technical skills to begin in PGY 2 or PGY 3 and be incorporated throughout the remainder of training. Quality assurance should be monitored closely but not separately from that of the surgical service. Certification of the resident should not depend on numbers, nor be specifically singled out from the body of surgery. There is adequate patient demand to establish the endoscopy unit under the supervision of a surgeon, either as a separate unit or as part of the surgical clinic. However, as the number of endoscopic procedures performed approaches 600 per year, a fully dedicated endoscopy room and full-time gastrointestinal assistant technician are required. The most efficient method of postsedation recovery is through coordination with an ambulatory surgery unit or postoperative recovery room. The current standard for equipment is video endoscopy in order to provide the most efficient method for surgical training.

Digestive System Surgical Procedures↗

Endoscopy of the small intestine.

For the patient and the clinician, it is well that small-bowel diseases are unusual, as our ability to access this area remains limited. Frequently, all of the diagnostic and therapeutic modalities of radiology, endoscopy, and surgery are required for successful resolution of a given problem. Because management of bleeding from a small-bowel source usually will involve the surgeon at some point, it is mandatory that the best "road map" be obtained prior to exploration. If a small-bowel source is suspected after a negative endoscopic evaluation of the esophagus, stomach, duodenum, and colon, then the clinician must decide which radiographic and endoscopic examination is most appropriate. If bleeding is slow or intermittent, push-type enteroscopy to evaluate the proximal jejunum will have an expected diagnostic discovery rate of about 30 per cent. A stiffening over-tube or internal cable should result in deeper passage of the instrument and a potentially greater yield. Retrograde ileoscopy should be a part of every colonoscopy done for occult bleeding. If endoscopy does not identify a bleeding source, then a detailed barium study of the small bowel using an enteroclysis double-contrast technique will discover more pathology than a standard small-bowel-follow-through. Because sonde-type enteroscopes are not readily available, the clinician must decide at this point whether to refer the patient to an enteroscopist or consider surgery and intraoperative endoscopy. If a bleeding source has been found, then intraoperative endoscopy can localize lesions for specific resection. If the pathology remains obscure, intraoperative endoscopy will have a discovery rate of about 70 per cent. For more active hemorrhage, a bleeding scan with 99mTc-labeled red blood cells can confirm that blood loss is continuing and also will guide the angiographer toward a more directed study, thus decreasing the contrast material load for the patient. If a bleeding source can be identified angiographically, a short course of vasopressin infusion to convert the need for surgical intervention to a more elective situation would be beneficial to the patient. Intraoperative endoscopy under urgent conditions is more difficult, because luminal blood must be lavaged or cleared for a proper examination. Many times, however, intraoperative endoscopy can "surround" a segment of intestine by identifying areas that are clearly normal.

Endoscopes↗

Cost effectiveness of initial endoscopy for dyspepsia in patients over age 50 years: a randomised controlled trial in primary care.

BACKGROUND: Dyspepsia can be managed by initial endoscopy and treatment based on endoscopic findings, or by empirical prescribing. We aimed to determine the cost effectiveness of initial endoscopy compared with usual management in patients with dyspepsia over age 50 years presenting to their primary care physician. METHODS: 422 patients were recruited and randomly assigned to initial endoscopy or usual management. Primary outcomes were effect of treatment on dyspepsia symptoms and cost effectiveness. Secondary outcomes were quality of life and patient satisfaction. Total costs were calculated from individual patient's use of resources with unit costs applied from national data. Statistical analysis of uncertainty on incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) was done along with a sensitivity analysis on unit costs with cost-effectiveness acceptability curves. FINDINGS: In the 12 months following recruitment, 213 (84%) patients had an endoscopy compared with 75 (41%) controls. Initial endoscopy resulted in a significant improvement in symptom score (p=0.03), and quality of life pain dimension (p=0.03), and a 48% reduction in the use of proton pump inhibitors (p=0.005). The ICER was Pound Sterling1728 (UK Pound Sterling) per patient symptom-free at 12 months. The ICER was very sensitive to the cost of endoscopy, and could be reduced to Pound Sterling165 if the unit cost of this procedure fell from Pound Sterling246 to Pound Sterling100. INTERPRETATION: Initial endoscopy in dyspeptic patients over age 50 might be a cost-effective intervention.

Aged↗

Wireless capsule endoscopy for obscure small-bowel disorders: final results of the first pediatric controlled trial.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Obscure small-bowel disorders are jejunal and ileal lesions undiagnosed by traditional imaging techniques (endoscopic, radiologic). We evaluated the diagnostic usefulness and safety of capsule endoscopy for obscure small-bowel disorders in children and adolescents. METHODS: Comparative, prospective, self-controlled trials in patients (age, 10-18 y) suspected to have either small-bowel Crohn's disease, polyps, or obscure gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding. Capsule results were compared with the diagnostic imaging studies normally used in this age group. RESULTS: Among 20 patients suspected of Crohn's disease, multiple lesions consistent with this diagnosis were observed by capsule endoscopy in 50%. Small-bowel Crohn's disease was ruled out in 8 patients. Eosinophilic enteropathy was found in 2 others. For polyp detection (n = 6), capsule endoscopy yielded 100% concordance with the control studies when analyzed per patient. However, capsule endoscopy revealed a greater number (50%) of polyps. Among patients with obscure bleeding (n = 4), the capsule examination confirmed a diagnosis of vascular malformations in 3. Capsule endoscopy more accurately identified the precise source of bleeding compared with angiography. All 30 capsule studies were well tolerated, although 1 capsule was retained owing to an inflammatory stenosis. The capsule eventually was expelled after corticosteroid therapy. CONCLUSIONS: Capsule endoscopy correctly diagnosed or excluded a bleeding source, small-bowel polyps, or Crohn's disease of the small bowel in 29 of 30 patients. Capsule endoscopy permits an accurate, noninvasive approach for diagnosing obscure small bowel lesions in children over the age of 10.

Adolescent↗

Safety and efficacy of glucagon as a premedication for upper gastrointestinal endoscopy--a comparative study with butyl scopolamine bromide.

BACKGROUND: Glucagon inhibits digestive motility and is used for endoscopic premedication; however, its effect on cardiopulmonary function during endoscopy has not yet been fully investigated. AIM: To clarify the efficacy and safety of glucagon compared with butyl scopolamine bromide as upper gastrointestinal endoscopy premedication. METHODS: Two hundred and forty consecutive patients over 40 years of age, referred for upper gastrointestinal endoscopy, without any complications, were studied. These patients were randomly premedicated with butyl scopolamine bromide (SC group) or glucagon (G group). Time course changes in blood pressure, arterial oxygen saturation, heart rate and the number of retching episodes during endoscopy were examined. The efficacy of glucose tablets after upper gastrointestinal endoscopy to prevent hypoglycaemia caused by glucagon was evaluated. Cardiopulmonary parameters were also examined in 77 complicated patients with glucagon premedication (GC group). RESULTS: A continuous increase in heart rate during upper gastrointestinal endoscopy was observed in the SC group, but not in the G and GC groups. Blood pressure, arterial oxygen saturation and number of retching episodes were not different between the groups. Hypoglycaemia-related symptoms were frequent in the G group without glucose tablets, but were prevented by the administration of glucose. CONCLUSIONS: Glucagon has a weaker effect on cardiopulmonary function during upper gastrointestinal endoscopy than butyl scopolamine bromide. Glucose administration prevents hypoglycaemia-related symptoms caused by glucagon.

Aged↗

Underutilization of upper gastrointestinal endoscopy.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Efforts to reduce costs in health care may raise concerns about underuse of medical procedures. This study prospectively assessed underuse of upper gastrointestinal endoscopy in a cohort of patients in whom we have recently published data on overuse of endoscopy. METHODS: Underuse was identified by formal necessity criteria for endoscopy, obtained by an explicit panel process. Outpatients were consecutively included in two clinical settings. Setting A consisted of 20 primary care physicians and 7215 patient visits that occurred within 1 month. Setting B consisted of 920 visits that occurred during 3 weeks at an outpatient clinic. RESULTS: During these 8135 visits, 611 patients complained of upper digestive symptoms; 63 of them underwent endoscopy. Underuse was identified in 72 patients (11.8%). The two clinical situations mainly responsible for underuse of endoscopy were uninvestigated peptic symptoms resistant to treatment and dysphagia. At first follow-up, 29 of the patients with initial underuse still fulfilled criteria of necessity (underuse rate, 4.7%). One-year follow-up showed underuse of endoscopy in 5 patients. CONCLUSIONS: This prospective evidence shows that underuse of a medical procedure exists. The estimated overuse and underuse of endoscopy in this cohort were approximately equal (5%). Improving quality of care will require reductions of both overuse and underuse of medical procedures.

Adolescent↗

A pooled analysis to evaluate results of capsule endoscopy trials.

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIM: Capsule endoscopy is a new tool in the evaluation of the small intestine. To speed evaluation and acceptance of this technology, the manufacturer (Given Imaging Ltd, Yoqneam, Israel) funded several trials. The data from these trials were collected at a central repository using a standardized reporting tool. Presentation of this data to the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in July 2003 led to the removal of the adjunctive term with regard to indication for capsule endoscopy, recognizing that the method is of independent importance for evaluating the small bowel. The aim of the present study was to combine the data from several capsule trials to help determine the yield and miss rate of capsule endoscopy for different diseases, compared with alternative diagnostic modalities. METHODS: Capsule studies were identified from a master database of funded studies. Studies were included in the pooled analysis if they reported a prospective comparison with another modality for evaluation of the small intestine. RESULTS: 32 studies with a total of 691 patients were found in the master database, of which 24 studies, representing 530 patients, met inclusion criteria and were entered into the pooled analysis. Prior to study entry, patients had undergone a mean of 6.77 diagnostic procedures, without findings. Of these 24 studies, 14 (involving 310 patients) were categorized as "bleeding" studies, and 10 studies (220 patients) as "nonbleeding small-bowel disorders" studies. The comparison procedure was push enteroscopy in 300 patients (in 45 for nonbleeding disorders), small-bowel series in 140 patients (in 125 for non-bleeding disorders), and colonoscopy with ileoscopy in 90 patients (50 for nonbleeding disorders). Overall analysis per patient showed new findings from capsule endoscopy in 50 % of patients; 17 % had new findings from the comparison method; in 22 % there were similar findings; and in 11 % there were no findings. A total of 1349 instances of disease were identified in the 530 examinations. Capsule endoscopy solely detected 87 % of the disease instances, while the comparison method solely detected 13 %. The yield for push enteroscopy alone was 14.8 %, for small-bowel series it was 9.9 %, and for colonoscopy it was 13.2 %. Capsule endoscopy missed 146 disease instances for a miss rate of 10 %; 989 were missed by the comparison methods for a miss rate of 73 %; and 214 were detected by both methods. CONCLUSION: Capsule endoscopy is the state of the art method for noninvasive detection of small-bowel disease.

Adolescent↗

Comparison of capsule endoscopy with ileocolonoscopy for detecting small-bowel lesions in patients with seronegative spondyloarthropathies.

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS: Patients with spondyloarthropathies are often found to have signs of small-bowel inflammation when examined by ileocolonoscopy. Because capsule endoscopy has been found to be superior to other endoscopic and radiological modalities in the detection of small-bowel inflammation, we aimed to compare the diagnostic yield of capsule endoscopy with that of ileocolonoscopy in the detection of small-bowel lesions in patients with spondyloarthropathies. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Twenty patients with documented seronegative peripheral arthritis, ankylosing spondylitis, or sacroiliitis, who had not taken nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) in the preceding 2 months, participated in the study. The patients underwent capsule endoscopy, followed by ileocolonoscopy within 7 days, with blinded assessment of both examinations. Biopsies were taken when indicated and adverse events were monitored. Patients completed a questionnaire on their satisfaction with the two procedures. RESULTS: A total of 20 patients (11 men, 9 women; mean age 41+/-13 years) with seronegative inflammatory spondyloarthropathies but without abdominal complaints completed the study. No adverse effects were reported and all the capsules were excreted. Of these 20 patients, 11 (55%) had a normal small bowel on both examinations. Significant small-bowel findings (erythema, mucosal breaks, aphthous or linear ulcers, erosions) were detected by capsule endoscopy in six patients (30%) and by ileocolonoscopy in only one patient. In addition, capsule endoscopy detected significant upper gastrointestinal pathology in 40% of patients. The patients preferred capsule endoscopy to ileocolonoscopy. CONCLUSIONS: Capsule endoscopy detected more small-bowel lesions than ileocolonoscopy, and provided additional potentially relevant information on upper gastrointestinal pathology in patients with spondyloarthropathies.

Adult↗

The burden of upper gastrointestinal endoscopy in patients with Barrett's esophagus.

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS: Patients with Barrett's esophagus are recommended to undergo regular surveillance with upper gastrointestinal endoscopy, an invasive procedure that may cause anxiety, pain, and discomfort. We assessed to what extent patients perceived this procedure as burdensome. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 192 patients with Barrett's esophagus were asked to fill out questionnaires at 1 week and immediately before endoscopy, and at 1 week and 1 month afterwards. Four variables were assessed: (i) pain and discomfort experienced during endoscopy; (ii) symptoms; (iii) psychological burden, i. e., anxiety, depression and distress levels (Hospital Anxiety and Depression scale, Impact of Event Scale); and (iv) perceived risk of developing adenocarcinoma. RESULTS: At least one questionnaire was returned by 180 patients (94 %), 151 completed all four (79 %). Of all patients, only 14 % experienced the endoscopy as painful. However, 59 % reported it to be burdensome. Apart from an increase in throat ache (47 % after endoscopy versus 12 % before), the procedure did not cause physical symptoms. Patients' anxiety, depression, and distress levels were significantly increased in the week before endoscopy compared with the week after. Patients perceiving their risk of developing adenocarcinoma as high reported higher levels of psychological distress and that the procedure was a greater burden. CONCLUSIONS: Upper gastrointestinal endoscopy is burdensome for many patients with Barrett's esophagus and causes moderate distress. Perception of a high risk of adenocarcinoma may increase distress and the burden experienced from the procedure. The benefits of endoscopic surveillance for patients with Barrett's esophagus should be weighed against its drawbacks, including the short-term burden for patients.

Adenocarcinoma↗

Complications of diagnostic gastrointestinal endoscopy.

Undesired side effects and complications of gastrointestinal endoscopy and premedication are rare events. However, this is true only of endoscopic units with experienced investigators, modern equipment and monitoring. The complication rate of upper gastrointestinal endoscopy is about 0.1% with cardiopulmonary events predominating. The typical complication of colonoscopy is perforation, seen in 0.2%. The relevant ERCP specific complication is acute pancreatitis in about 1%, followed by acute cholangitis. The most serious complications of laparoscopy are hemorrhage from the liver biopsy site, bleeding from abdominal wall varices, and perforation of the colon. The cardiopulmonary mortality is low for upper gastrointestinal endoscopy as well as for colonoscopy (1 death/20,000 procedures). Premedication, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, coronary heart disease, valvular heart disease and, last but not least, advanced age, must be considered risk factors for the development of complications of gastrointestinal endoscopy. Balanced indication, particularly in the elderly patient, should be the consequence. If possible, endoscopy should be performed without sedatives. If premedication is necessary, it should be used sparingly. Not only patients at high risk for the development of cardiopulmonary complications, but all patients undergoing endoscopy must be carefully monitored after premedication, during and after endoscopy. The non-invasive procedure of pulse-oximetry is appropriate for continuous monitoring of arterial oxygen saturation in patients with cardiopulmonary diseases, irrespective of their premedication status. Antibiotic prophylaxis is recommended in patients with valvular heart disease or prosthetic valves. Standardized cleaning and disinfection of the instruments is of great importance to avoid hepatitis B or HIV transfer.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Cholangiopancreatography, Endoscopic Retrograde↗

Role of Lugol dye endoscopy in the diagnosis of early esophageal cancer.

To evaluate the role of Lugol dye endoscopy in diagnosing early esophageal cancer, we reviewed findings of dye endoscopy and those of conventional endoscopy in 17 early esophageal cancers that were demonstrated as unstained areas on dyeing with Lugol solution. Histologically, all 17 lesions were squamous cell carcinomas; 10 lesions being mucosal carcinomas, the remaining 7 lesions mucosal carcinomas spreading beyond the epithelial layer. The lesions ranged from 0.7 to 4.0 cm in size. Abnormal findings were noted under conventional endoscopy in all but 3 lesions diagnosed only by postoperative pathohistology, regardless of the size and depth of the invasion. Under conventional endoscopy, the following types of morphological changes were noted in 8 (57.1%) of the 14 lesions: slight elevation (1 lesion), depression (6 lesions), and deformed arc (1 lesion). A color change was noted endoscopically in 12 of the 14 lesions (85.7%), this change being redness in all 12 lesions. The unstained area on the resected specimen was consistent with the size of the lesion that was determined by using serially sectioned blocks in all cases. Moreover, the former completely (100%) coincided with the histological area where PAS reaction was weak. In conclusion, under conventional endoscopy, a color change such as redness is an important indicator of minute or superficial esophageal cancer, as is such morphological change as depression, elevation or deformed arc. On the other hand, Lugol dye endoscopy is very helpful in detecting esophageal cancer unassociated with any morphological or color change. It also provides accurate information about the extent of the cancer.

Aged↗

Perspectives in "electronic endoscopy". Past, present and future of fibers and CCDs in medical endoscopes.

Electronic endoscopy has undergone considerable evolution in recent years. Early instruments had poorer resolution than fiberscopes, and distorted colors significantly. The second generation of electronic endoscopes has been considerably improved, and electronic endoscopy is expected to play a major role in endoscopy in the next decade, with its enhanced teaching abilities, permanent image storage, reproduction and retrieval. An important new development has been the development of a high-resolution colonoscope & gastroscope. Electronic endoscopes are now able to produce better resolution than fiberscopes, and the future should bring further improvements in resolution with electronic instruments. A number of problems still remain to be solved with electronic endoscopy. Irregular reflection from secretions, food and blood at short focus (less than 1 cm) results in a loss of resolution, which makes electronic endoscopy particularly difficult when bleeding is brisk. Electronic endoscopes synthesize color from a strobed signal of red, blue and green in a processor. Color is dependent on brightness, and at close focus, excessive brightness in the center of the field results in erratic color reproduction. Images acquired at electronic endoscopy may be digitized for storage and processing in a computer--which, however, is not a straightforward task at the present time. Image processing in electronic endoscopy is still in its early stages, but we anticipate that new developments in early diagnosis, classification and measurement of lesions will take place. Digitized images can also be transmitted via telephone lines, and it will soon be possible to instantaneously send images across the world.

Color↗

A prospective, randomized controlled trial of sedation vs. no sedation in outpatient diagnostic upper gastrointestinal endoscopy.

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS: The majority of gastrointestinal endoscopists in the United Kingdom routinely use intravenous sedation prior to diagnostic upper gastrointestinal endoscopy. We conducted a prospective, randomized controlled clinical trial to help determine whether the use of sedation influences the duration, safety, and tolerance of diagnostic upper gastrointestinal endoscopy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Adults referred for outpatient diagnostic upper gastrointestinal endoscopy were invited to participate in the study. Patients with a history of previous upper gastrointestinal endoscopy or dysphagia were excluded. Patients were prospectively randomized to sedation with intravenous midazolam (5 mg for those under 65 years or 3 mg for those aged 65 or more), or no sedation. All patients were given topical oropharyngeal anaesthesia with 100 mg lignocaine spray. Outcome measures included duration of procedure, ease of procedure (as assessed by medical and nursing staff), tolerance of procedure (as assessed by patients), and incidence of complications. RESULTS: 100 patients were randomized to receive sedation or no sedation. The two groups were well matched for age, sex, and number of biopsies taken during the procedure. In the non-sedated group, the duration of endoscopy tended to be reduced and the procedure tended to be easier according to the endoscopists' assessment (neither of these observations was significant). The sedated group reported greater comfort for the procedure (P < 0.001), although both groups tolerated the procedure well, and the majority in both groups preferred to have any future procedure repeated in the same manner. There were no serious adverse events in either group. CONCLUSIONS: In patients who are willing to contemplate upper gastrointestinal endoscopy without sedation, the avoidance of sedation may lead to faster and easier endoscopies, without any increased risk of procedural difficulties or adverse events.

Adult↗

Automated graphic assessment of respiratory activity is superior to pulse oximetry and visual assessment for the detection of early respiratory depression during therapeutic upper endoscopy.

BACKGROUND: Recommendations from the American Society of Anesthesiologists suggest that monitoring for apnea using the detection of exhaled carbon dioxide (capnography) is a useful adjunct in the assessment of ventilatory status of patients undergoing sedation and analgesia. There are no data on the utility of capnography in GI endoscopy, nor is the frequency of abnormal ventilatory activity during endoscopy known. The aims of this study were to determine the following: (1) the frequency of abnormal ventilatory activity during therapeutic upper endoscopy, (2) the sensitivity of observation and pulse oximetry in the detection of apnea or disordered respiration, and (3) whether capnography provides an improvement over accepted monitoring techniques. METHODS: Forty-nine patients undergoing therapeutic upper endoscopy were monitored with standard methods including pulse oximetry, automated blood pressure measurement, and visual assessment. In addition, graphic assessment of respiratory activity with sidestream capnography was performed in all patients. Endoscopy personnel were blinded to capnography data. Episodes of apnea or disordered respiration detected by capnography were documented and compared with the occurrence of hypoxemia, hypercapnea, hypotension, and the recognition of abnormal respiratory activity by endoscopy personnel. RESULTS: Comparison of simultaneous respiratory rate measurements obtained by capnography and by auscultation with a pretracheal stethoscope verified that capnography was an excellent indicator of respiratory rate when compared with the reference standard (auscultation) (r = 0.967, p < 0.001). Fifty-four episodes of apnea or disordered respiration occurred in 28 patients (mean duration 70.8 seconds). Only 50% of apnea or disordered respiration episodes were eventually detected by pulse oximetry. None were detected by visual assessment (p < 0.0010). CONCLUSIONS: Apnea/disordered respiration occurs commonly during therapeutic upper endoscopy and frequently precedes the development of hypoxemia. Potentially important abnormalities in respiratory activity are undetected with pulse oximetry and visual assessment.

Adult↗

Insights into endoscopy training: a qualitative study of learning experience.

Endoscopy is an important diagnostic and therapeutic procedure that demands high levels of cognitive and technical skill to perform effectively. Surprisingly little is known about how endoscopy is best taught and training is often inadequate. The aims of this study were to explore the learning experiences of endoscopy trainees to improve our understanding of current training. Following the use of an initial focus group to generate appropriate themes semi-structured interviews were performed on 10 trainees to assess their learning experiences. Many different components of the learning experience were identified; one-to-one supervised performance forms the basis for teaching but is often sub-optimal; endoscopy learners experience anxiety and find re-adopting the role of novice difficult; motivation, clear explanation and feedback are crucial to learning; breaking down endoscopy training into segments is seen as valuable and as learners progress a gradual withdrawal of supervision is appreciated. Several of the issues contributing to a positive learning experience relate closely to published evidence and theory relating to skills teaching from other fields. A model identifying the key elements of endoscopy learning is proposed. Further work to apply and test the findings from this study should lead to improved endoscopy training.

Education, Medical, Continuing↗

3D modeling and virtual endoscopy of the small bowel based on magnetic resonance imaging in patients with inflammatory bowel disease.

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: Small bowel MRI (MR imaging) is a new imaging modality that excellently depicts small intestine pathology in patients with inflammatory bowel disease. Virtual endoscopy based on sectional imaging is a recently introduced technique to create endoscopy like views. The aim of this study was to evaluate the feasibility of virtual small bowel endoscopy based on MR imaging in patients with Crohn disease. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty consecutive patients with Crohn disease were scanned after oral application of pineapple juice for contrasting the small bowel. Dedicated high resolution T1 weighted 3D-FLASH sequences with fat suppression were used for volume scanning. Volume-rendered 3D models of the small bowel were created and virtual endoscopy was performed. The feasibility and quality of this new visualization method was assessed. RESULTS: In nine of 30 patients virtual endoscopy was considered as good quality (flight through the entire small bowel was possible, typical folds were revealed). In 18 patients fair quality (at least 4/5 of the small bowel were depicted adequately) was assessed. In three of 30 patients virtual endoscopy was not sufficiently possible because of inadequate bowel filling or breathing artifacts. Three fistulae diagnosed on 2D MRI were visualized on the virtual endoscopic view. CONCLUSION: Virtual endoscopy of the small bowel is feasible based on high resolution MR imaging. Vivid insight views and 3D models provide an interesting addition to sectional MR findings.

Adolescent↗

The yield of diagnostic upper endoscopy: results of a prospective audit.

Because of its widespread availability and the generally increasing economic pressure, endoscopy needs critical scrutiny to establish appropriate clinical guidelines. We carried out a prospective evaluation of 200 consecutive upper gastrointestinal (GI) endoscopies to ascertain the frequency of abnormal findings when specific indications were the impetus to endoscopy. Those indications were esophageal complaints, upper GI bleeding, abdominal discomfort, known premalignant disorders and abnormal findings on barium meal. The overall frequency of abnormal findings for all indications was 66%. Abnormal endoscopic findings were most often present when upper GI bleeding or premalignant conditions (88 and 87%, respectively) were reasons for endoscopy. Endoscopic confirmation of lesions seen on barium meal was 64%. Only 37% of patients endoscoped for abdominal discomfort had abnormal findings. Moreover, as symptoms resolved in 70% of such patients within 1 to 9 weeks, the low yield of endoscopy suggests that our current threshold for endoscopy in this setting may be too low. Refinement of the indications for and reassessment of the timing of endoscopy are needed.

Abdomen↗

Early or delayed endoscopy for patients with peptic ulcer bleeding. A prospective randomized study.

The benefit of early endoscopy in the management of peptic ulcer bleeding remains controversial. In this study we looked at the role of early endoscopy in bleeding peptic ulcer patients with clear, "coffee grounds," or bloody nasogastric aspirate. A consecutive series of 325 patients with peptic ulcer bleeding were included (218 patients with clear aspirate, 77 patients with coffee-grounds aspirate, and 30 patients with bloody aspirate). They were randomized to receive early endoscopy (within 12 h of arrival at the emergency room) or delayed endoscopy (12 h after arrival at the emergency room). Early endoscopy did not benefit patients with clear or coffee-grounds aspirate. However, combined with endoscopic therapy, it did significantly benefit patients with bloody aspirate in reducing the need for blood transfusion (mean, 450 ml vs. 666 ml; p < 0.001) and hospital stay (mean, 4 vs. 14.5 days, p < 0.001). Early endoscopy and endoscopic therapy are not needed in bleeding peptic ulcer patients with clear or coffee-grounds nasogastric aspirate. However, early endoscopy and endoscopic therapy benefit patients with bloody nasogastric aspirate.

Aged↗