Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Discrimination Learning”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 361 records · Page 20Linked to original sources

Value transmission in discrimination learning involving stimulus chains.

Rats learned a series of reversals of a positional discrimination in which responses to one lever led to delayed food and responses to a second lever led to no food. Interpolated within the delays leading to the different outcomes were two-link stimulus chains. The pairing of each stimulus element with the delayed outcome of food or no food varied across reversals. Either stimulus element could have the same correlation with outcome as occurred on the preceding reversal or the opposite correlation as on the preceding reversal. New reversals were acquired more quickly when both stimulus elements had the same status as during the preceding reversal, and were acquired most slowly when both stimulus elements had the opposite status as that of the preceding reversal. The rate of learning was intermediate when only one of the stimulus elements had the same status as that during the preceding reversal. All of the data are compatible with an interpretation in terms of backward chaining of stimulus value.

Animals↗

The role of visual and haptic cues in children's discrimination learning.

Three experiments using kindergarten boys and girls (Ns = 126, 84, and 72, respectively) tested the hypothesis that adding haptic to visual information facilitates discrimination of three-dimensional objects on more difficult (three-choice) problems, but not on easier (two-choice) problems. Kindergartners were given a two-or three-choice discrimination problem under one of four conditions of cue availability: visual cues, haptic cues, and visual plus haptic cues with stimuli touched or not touched before choosing. Addition of haptic cues did not improve performance either on two-choice problems (two or three experiments), as predicted, or on three-choice problems (all three experiments), contrary to predictions.

Child, Preschool↗