Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Clarithromycin”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 361 records · Page 20Linked to original sources
PubMed1998

Tolerance and pharmacokinetic interactions of rifabutin and clarithromycin in human immunodeficiency virus-infected volunteers.

This study evaluated the tolerance and potential pharmacokinetic interactions between clarithromycin (500 mg every 12 h) and rifabutin (300 mg daily) in clinically stable human immunodeficiency virus-infected volunteers with CD4 counts of <200 cells/mm3. Thirty-four subjects were randomized equally to either regimen A or regimen B. On days 1 to 14, subjects assigned to regimen A received clarithromycin and subjects assigned to regimen B received rifabutin, and then both groups received both drugs on days 15 to 42. Of the 14 regimen A and the 15 regimen B subjects who started combination therapy, 1 subject in each group prematurely discontinued therapy due to toxicity, but 19 of 29 subjects reported nausea, vomiting, and/or diarrhea. Pharmacokinetic analysis included data for 11 regimen A and 14 regimen B subjects. Steady-state pharmacokinetic parameters for single-agent therapy (day 14) and combination therapy (day 42) were compared. Regimen A resulted in a mean decrease of 44% (P = 0.003) in the clarithromycin area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC), while there was a mean increase of 57% (P = 0.004) in the AUC of the clarithromycin metabolite 14-OH-clarithromycin. Regimen B resulted in a mean increase of 99% (P = 0.001) in the rifabutin AUC and a mean increase of 375% (P < 0.001) in the AUC of the rifabutin metabolite 25-O-desacetyl-rifabutin. The usefulness of this combination for prophylaxis of Mycobacterium avium infections is limited by frequent gastrointestinal adverse events. Coadministration of clarithromycin and rifabutin results in significant bidirectional pharmacokinetic interactions. The resulting increase in rifabutin levels may explain the increased frequency of uveitis observed with concomitant use of these drugs.

Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome↗
PubMed1998

In vitro susceptibility of Mycobacterium ulcerans to clarithromycin.

Buruli ulcer (BU), caused by Mycobacterium ulcerans, was recently recognized by the World Health Organization as an important emerging disease. While antimycobacterial therapy is often effective for the earliest nodular or ulcerative lesions, medical management of BU lesions in patients presenting for treatment is usually disappointing, leaving wide surgical excision the only alternative. Advanced ulcerated lesions of BU rarely respond to antimycobacterial agents; however, perioperative administration of such drugs may prevent relapses or disseminated infections. Clarithromycin possesses strong activity in vitro and in vivo against most nontuberculous mycobacteria. In this study we determined the antimycobacterial activity of this drug in vitro against 46 strains of M. ulcerans isolated from 11 countries. The MIC of clarithromycin was determined at pH 6.6 (on 7H11 agar) and at pH 7.4 (on Mueller-Hinton agar). The MICs ranged from 0.125 to 2 microg/ml at pH 6.6 and from <0.125 to 0.5 microg/ml at pH 7.4. For the majority of the strains, geographic origin did not play a significant role. Thirty-eight strains (83%) were inhibited by 0.5 microg/ml at pH 7.4. These MICs are below peak therapeutic concentrations of clarithromycin obtainable in blood. These results suggest that clarithromycin is a promising drug both for the treatment of early lesions of M. ulcerans and for the prevention of hematogenous dissemination of the etiologic agent during and after surgery. Studies should be initiated to evaluate the effects of clarithromycin in combination with ethambutol and rifampin on M. ulcerans both in vitro and in experimentally infected mice. Multidrug regimens containing clarithromycin may also help control the secondary bacterial infections sometimes seen in BU patients, most importantly osteomyelitis.

Anti-Bacterial Agents↗
PubMed1999

Lack of effect of zafirlukast on the pharmacokinetics of azithromycin, clarithromycin, and 14-hydroxyclarithromycin in healthy volunteers.

This randomized, open-label, crossover study was conducted to investigate whether the coadministration of zafirlukast would affect the pharmacokinetics of azithromycin, clarithromycin, or 14-hydroxyclarithromycin (14-OHC). Twelve healthy subjects (six males and six females) received single 500-mg doses of azithromycin and clarithromycin with and without zafirlukast given to a steady-state concentration. Blood was collected prior to all macrolide doses and for 3 and 10 days after each clarithromycin and azithromycin dose, respectively. Serum was assayed for azithromycin, clarithromycin, and 14-OHC concentrations by validated high-performance liquid chromatography assay systems. Data analyses were done by noncompartmental and nonparametric methods. Analysis of the patients indicated that the addition of steady-state concentrations of zafirlukast did not significantly alter the pharmacokinetic parameters of or overall exposure (based on the area under the concentration-time curve) to azithromycin, clarithromycin, and 14-OHC. While zafirlukast is a known inhibitor of CYP3A4, it does not appear to exert a clinically or statistically significant pharmacokinetic effect on azithromycin, clarithromycin, or 14-OHC.

Adult↗
PubMed2002

Influence of clarithromycin on early atherosclerotic lesions after Chlamydia pneumoniae infection in a rabbit model.

Chlamydia pneumoniae may play a role in atherogenesis and vascular diseases, and antibiotics may prove useful in these conditions. Three groups of New Zealand White rabbits (24 per group) were infected via the nasopharynx with C. pneumoniae on three separate occasions (2 weeks apart). Group I was untreated and sacrificed at 12 weeks; group II received clarithromycin at 20 mg/kg/day for 8 days, beginning 5 days after each inoculation (early treatment); and group III received a similar dose of clarithromycin starting 2 weeks after the third inoculation and continued for 6 weeks thereafter (delayed treatment). To test for a possible anti-inflammatory effect of clarithromycin, two other groups of uninfected rabbits (12 animals in each) were fed 0.5% cholesterol-enriched chow, and one of these groups was treated with clarithromycin at 30 mg/kg/day for 6 weeks. Of 23 untreated infected rabbits, 8 developed early lesions of atherosclerosis, whereas 2 of the 24 early-treated group II had similar changes (P = 0.036 [75% efficacy]). However, in the delayed-treatment group, group III, 3 of 24 rabbits developed early lesions of atherosclerosis, thus demonstrating 62.5% reduction compared to the untreated controls (P = 0.07 [trend to statistical significance]). C. pneumoniae antigen was detected in 8 of 23 group I (untreated) rabbits versus 1 of 24 of the early-treated (group II) rabbits and 4 of 24 animals in the delayed group III (P = 0.009 and 0.138, respectively). All of the untreated, cholesterol-fed rabbits had moderate to advanced atherosclerosis (grade III or IV); clarithromycin had no effect on reducing the prevalence of but did reduce the extent of atherosclerosis in the cholesterol-fed rabbits by 17% compared to untreated controls. Thus, clarithromycin administration modified C. pneumoniae-induced atherosclerotic lesions and reduced the ability to detect organism in tissue. Early treatment was more effective than delayed treatment.

Animals↗
PubMed2003

Antimicrobial and immunologic activities of clarithromycin in a murine model of Mycoplasma pneumoniae-induced pneumonia.

Because macrolide antibiotics are hypothesized to possess immunomodulatory activity independent of their antimicrobial activity, we evaluated the immunomodulatory effect of clarithromycin in a murine model of lung inflammation induced by either live or UV-killed Mycoplasma pneumoniae. BALB/c mice were intranasally inoculated once with live or UV-killed M. pneumoniae. Clarithromycin (25 mg/kg of body weight) or placebo was subcutaneously administered once daily in both groups of mice. In mice infected with live M. pneumoniae, clarithromycin treatment significantly reduced quantitative M. pneumoniae bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) culture, pulmonary histopathologic scores (HPS), and airway resistance-obstruction (as measured by plethysmography) compared with placebo. Concentrations of tumor necrosis factor alpha, gamma interferon, interleukin-6 (IL-6), mouse KC (functional IL-8), JE/MCP-1, and MIP-1alpha in BAL fluid were also significantly decreased in mice infected with live M. pneumoniae given clarithromycin. In contrast, mice inoculated with UV-killed M. pneumoniae had no significant reduction in HPS, airway resistance-obstruction, or BAL cytokine or chemokine concentrations in response to clarithromycin administration. Clarithromycin therapy demonstrated beneficial effects (microbiologic, histologic, respiratory, and immunologic) on pneumonia in the mice infected with live M. pneumoniae; this was not observed in the mice inoculated with UV-killed M. pneumoniae.

Animals↗
PubMed2006

Comparing gatifloxacin and clarithromycin in pneumonia symptom resolution and process of care.

In looking for outcome differences beyond rates of cure, we prospectively compared the symptom resolution, side effects, and processes of care between the use of clarithromycin and gatifloxacin for the treatment of radiographically confirmed community-acquired pneumonia. We conducted a multicenter, randomized, open-label study comparing gatifloxacin monotherapy to clarithromycin alone or combined with ceftriaxone for patients with multiple risk factors. We measured the return to usual activities and symptoms over seven interviews ending 42 days after randomization. Admission and hospital discharge decision support were provided to treating physicians. We enrolled 266 patients over the age of 18 years between September 2000 and June 2003. The groups were similar in age and gender, with a mean age of 53.5+/-19.4 years, and were 54% female. Patient severity as determined by the number of risk factors and the Pneumonia Severity Index was similar between groups; 95% of the patients were low risk. A total of 91% of patients completed at least five of seven symptom interviews. In the clarithromycin study arm, 64% received concomitant therapy with ceftriaxone. We found no significant difference in return to usual activities, pneumonia-specific symptom scores, and 12-item short-form health survey scores. Individual symptom scores were similar except for bad taste and injection site soreness, which were higher in clarithromycin patients. The rates of hospital admission and length of stay were similar. The cost of antibiotic was higher in the clarithromycin group: $257 versus $110 for gatifloxacin. We found that gatifloxacin monotherapy is similar to clarithromycin given with or without ceftriaxone for the treatment of community-acquired pneumonia, except that antibiotic cost, bad taste, and injection site soreness favor the use of gatifloxacin.

Adult↗
PubMed1997

Variability in susceptibilities of Haemophilus influenzae to clarithromycin and azithromycin due to medium pH.

The National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards (NCCLS) methods for susceptibility testing of Haemophilus influenzae in Haemophilus test medium allow a pH range of 7.2 to 7.4. However, it is known that bacteria may appear to be less susceptible to macrolides at lower pHs. Forty-four strains of H. influenzae were tested for their susceptibilities to clarithromycin and azithromycin by the disk diffusion and broth microdilution methods. The isolates appeared to be less susceptible at pH 7.2 than at pH 7.4 by both methods. Clarithromycin was less active at pH 7.2 against 43% of the isolates by the disk diffusion method and against 52% of the isolates by the broth microdilution method. Similarly, azithromycin was less active at pH 7.2 against 41 and 45% of the isolates by the disk diffusion and broth microdilution methods, respectively. Forty-two isolates were classified as clarithromycin susceptible and all isolates were classified as azithromycin susceptible by the disk diffusion method, regardless of the medium pH. However, only 21 isolates were clarithromycin susceptible at pH 7.2 and 34 isolates were susceptible at pH 7.4 by the broth microdilution method, even though quality control results indicated valid testing at both pHs. This study indicated that the results of tests of the susceptibility of H. influenzae with clarithromycin and azithromycin are highly dependent on the pH of the medium. Test results and their interpretations varied even when the medium pH was within the NCCLS-approved range and, coupled with the current NCCLS breakpoint of 8 microg/ml in the case of clarithromycin, may explain some of the observed discordances between the disk diffusion and broth microdilution methods.

Anti-Bacterial Agents↗
PubMed1998

Genotypic characterization of clarithromycin-resistant and -susceptible Helicobacter pylori strains from the same patient demonstrates existence of two unrelated isolates.

Clarithromycin-susceptible and clarithromycin-resistant Helicobacter pylori isolates from the same patient were investigated for the mode of development and mechanism of clarithromycin resistance. The clarithromycin-resistant strain UA1182 harbors homozygous A-to-G mutations at position 2143 in both copies of the 23S rRNA gene and has a phenotype of resistance to clarithromycin and clindamycin but no significant resistance to streptogramin B. Pulsed-field gel electrophoresis patterns of NruI- and NotI-digested genomic DNA from the Clas and Clar isolates demonstrated that they are genetically distinct, suggesting that the development of clarithromycin resistance is not from the mutation of the existing Clas strain but from a completely new strain.

Anti-Bacterial Agents↗
PubMed2003

Detection of clarithromycin-resistant Helicobacter pylori in stool samples.

The recognition of the role of Helicobacter pylori in gastric diseases has led to the widespread use of antibiotics in the eradication of this pathogen. The most advocated therapy, triple therapy, often includes clarithromycin. It is well known that clarithromycin resistance is one of the major causes of eradication failure. The development of a rapid noninvasive technique that could easily be performed on fecal samples and that could also provide information about the antibiotic resistance of this microorganism is therefore advisable. Previous findings have demonstrated that clarithromycin resistance is due to a single point mutation in the 23S rRNA. All the mutations described have been associated with specific restriction sites, namely BsaI (A2143G), MboII (A2142C/G), and HhaI (T2717C). On this basis we have developed a new method, a seminested PCR, allowing screening for clarithromycin resistance of H. pylori directly on stool samples. This method furnished a 783-bp fragment of the 23S rRNA, which was subsequently digested by MboII, BsaI, and HhaI, in order to identify single point mutations associated with clarithromycin resistance. Of a total of 283 stool samples examined, 125 were H. pylori positive and two of them were shown to contain clarithromycin-resistant strains due to the presence of a mutation at position 2717, whereas no PCR products contained mutations at position 2142 or 2143. In order to evaluate the reliability of the new system, we compared the results of restriction analysis of the PCR products with the MICs shown by the H. pylori isolates by culturing gastric biopsies from the same patients.

Anti-Bacterial Agents↗
PubMed2005

Diagnosis of Helicobacter pylori infection and determination of clarithromycin resistance by fluorescence in situ hybridization from formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded gastric biopsy specimens.

A reliable diagnostic test for Helicobacter pylori is important in clinical practice and research. The ideal diagnostic test for H. pylori should be sensitive, specific, and cost-effective. Helicobacter pylori resistance to clarithromycin is a common reason for failure of eradication therapy. The aim of this study was to evaluate the fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) method to detect H. pylori and determine clarithromycin resistance in formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded gastric biopsy specimens. One hundred seventeen gastric biopsy specimens from patients with dyspepsia were examined for the presence of H. pylori by conventional culture, FISH, and histopathological methods. A set of fluorescent-labeled oligonucleotide probes binding to either H. pylori 16S rRNA or 23S rRNA sequences were used for FISH analysis. Phenotypic antibiotic susceptibilities of the isolates were tested using the Epsilometer test method (E test). Helicobacter pylori was detected in 70 of 117 biopsy specimens by histopathological examination and FISH, whereas it was detected in 47 specimens by culturing. Histopathology and FISH techniques failed to identify H. pylori in 1 biopsy sample isolated by culture. Clarithromycin resistance was found in 11 of 46 H. pylori isolates using the E test method. All of the phenotypic resistance measurements of isolates were correlated with genotypic clarithromycin resistance. Eleven clarithromycin-resistant strains were identified by FISH. The diagnosis of H. pylori infection and the determination of clarithromycin resistance in formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded specimens using FISH is promising because it provides a rapid, reliable, and culture-independent diagnosis.

Anti-Bacterial Agents↗
PubMed2004

Characteristics and trends of clarithromycin-resistant Helicobacter pylori isolates in Japan over a decade.

Clarithromycin has been administered to patients in Japan since 1991. Clarithromycin-resistant Helicobacter pylori strains have been on the rise in Japan. We obtained H. pylori isolates between 1989 and 2000 and examined mutations of the 23S rRNA gene, which are closely associated with clarithromycin resistance. Isolates were obtained from 356 patients with H. pylori infection treated at the Hiroshima University. Sixty-one of the patients received clarithromycin-based H. pylori eradication therapy. Mutations of the 23S rRNA gene were examined by polymerase chain reaction-single strand conformation polymorphism (PCR-SSCP) followed by sequencing analysis. Mutant strains were found in 42 of the 356 patients (11.8%). The prevalence of mutant strains increased from 0 to 20.4% during the 12-year study period. The prevalence increased to more than 10% by 1995 and then to more 20% after 1999. The H. pylori eradication rate was significantly higher in patients with wild-type strains than in patients with mutant strains (72.0 vs. 36.4%, p = 0.024). Our data indicate that clarithromycin-resistant H. pylori strains have increased rapidly since 1995 and that the effectiveness of clarithromycin-based H. pylori eradication therapies may soon be compromised. Other new therapies may be necessary as first-line treatments in Japan.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2002

The effect of erythromycin and clarithromycin on the pharmacokinetics of intravenous digoxin in healthy volunteers.

Several case reports have suggested an interaction between digoxin and macrolide antibiotics. The authors investigated the effect of erythromycin and clarithromycin on the pharmacokinetics of intravenously administered digoxin (0.5 mg) in healthy subjects. Nine male subjects participated in three studies (digoxin alone, digoxin with erythromycin, and digoxin with clarithromycin). Subjects took erythromycin (800 mg per day) or clarithromycin (400 mg per day) on the day before digoxin dosing and during the kinetic study, Neither of the macrolides affected serum digoxin concentration-time curves. However, more than 1.3-fold increases in urinary digoxin excretions were observed during erythromycin and clarithromycin coadministration compared with digoxin alone. There were significant differences in renal clearance between macrolide coadministration and the control condition (digoxin alone: 98.4 ml/min; digoxin with erythromycin: 137.3 ml/min; digoxin with clarithromycin: 133.6 ml/min). In conclusion, neither erythromycin nor clarithromycin has a significant effect on serum digoxin disposition after an intravenous administration. Renal digoxin excretion is not inhibited but rather enhanced by both macrolides.

Administration, Oral↗
PubMed2002

In vivo pharmacodynamic evaluation of clarithromycin in comparison to erythromycin.

The efficacy of various dosing regimens of clarithromycin and erythromycin against recently isolated Streptococcus pneumoniae strains was determined in vivo using two animal infection models (mouse peritonitis and thigh infection). For the thigh infection model, mice received a total dose of 4 mg/Kg of either clarithromycin or erythromycin, as a single total dose or divided into 2, 4 or 8 doses/24h. After 24h of therapy S. pneumoniae organisms were killed at 2.06 to 4.03 log10 CFU/thigh by clarithromycin and the one- or two-dose regimens were significantly more effective than the four- or eight-dose regimens. Organism killing following 24h of therapy with erythromycin ranged from 1.13 to 2.31 log10 CFU/thigh, with the one- or two-dose regimens significantly less effective than the four- or eight-dose regimens. In the mouse survival study, the same dose of either clarithromycin or erythromycin was given as a single total dose or divided into two or four doses with dosing intervals of 4 and 2-times the t1/2 respectively. The results obtained in this model show that there is a significant difference in survival when clarithromycin is administered less frequently (4% deaths for the one-dose regimen in comparison to 40% deaths with the four-dose regimen, P < 0.01, Chi-square test). With erythromycin there was a trend for increased survival with the multiple-dose regimen, with significantly higher survival when concentrations exceeding the MIC were maintained for a longer time period. These results indicate that the time during which serum concentrations exceeding the MIC value of the pathogen is an important parameter for efficacy for erythromycin. On the contrary, results with both animal models demonstrate that bacterial killing and survival are significantly higher among clarithromycin-treated mice when the antibiotic is administered less frequently and the highest Cmax/MIC ratio is achieved.

Animals↗
PubMed2004

Clarithromycin reduces the severity of bronchial hyperresponsiveness in patients with asthma.

A randomised double-blind placebo-controlled study was designed to evaluate the effects of a semisynthetic macrolide antibiotic, clarithromycin, on bronchial hyperresponsiveness to methacholine in patients with a diagnosis of asthma. Adult asthma patients undergoing treatment with budesonide 400 microg b.i.d. and salbutamol 200 microg p.r.n. less than twice weekly were studied. Arm A (16 males/six females, aged 48 +/- 16 yrs) received clarithromycin 250 mg b.i.d. for 8 weeks, arm B (eight males/12 females, aged 42 +/- 12 yrs) clarithromycin 250 mg t.id. and arm C (six males/15 females, aged 41 +/- 16 yrs) placebo dextrose tablets. Bronchial hyperresponsiveness was quantified by measurement of the provocative dose of methacholine causing a 20% fall in forced expiratory volume in one second (PD20). Median (interquartile range) PD20 in the three groups before and after treatment with clarithromycin were: arm A: 0.3 (0.1-1) and 1.3 (0.6-2) mg; arm B: 0.4 (0.1-0.9) and 2 (2-2) mg; and arm C: 0.4 (0.1-0.9) and 0.3 (0.1-0.6) mg, respectively. Serum free cortisol levels were determined and remained unchanged from baseline in the clarithromycin-treated patients. It is concluded that clarithromycin reduces the degree of bronchial hyperresponsiveness in patients with asthma.

Adult↗
PubMed2004

Hospitalization rates among patients with community-acquired pneumonia treated with telithromycin vs clarithromycin: results from two randomized, double-blind, clinical trials.

AIMS: To compare hospitalization rates among patients with community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) treated with oral telithromycin and clarithromycin, based on pooled data from two randomized, double-blind, multinational clinical trials. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Adult patients with CAP eligible for oral therapy (Study 1, n = 448; Study 2, n = 575) received telithromycin 800 mg once daily for 10 (Study 1, 2-arms), 5 or 7 (Study 2, 3-arms) days, or clarithromycin 500 mg twice daily for 10 days. Frequency of CAP-related hospitalizations, physician visits/tests/procedures, and additional respiratory tract infection-related antibacterial use, as well as CAP-related length of hospital stay and hospitalization costs, were compared by treatment group (intent to treat populations) up until the late post-therapy visit (Days 31-36). Study investigators blinded to treatment regimen assessed whether hospital admissions were CAP related. RESULTS: Despite equivalent clinical efficacy for telithromycin vs clarithromycin in the clinically evaluable per-protocol populations (n = 784) (88.8% [428/482] vs 90.1% [272/302]--difference: -1.3%; 95% CI: -6.0, 3.4), telithromycin treatment for 5, 7, or 10 days was associated with significantly fewer CAP-related hospitalizations (p = 0.023) and CAP-related hospital days (p = 0.025) vs clarithromycin (reduction of 2.3 hospitalizations and 23.4 hospital days per 100 patients). Accordingly, estimated CAP-related hospitalization costs were significantly lower (p = 0.025) for telithromycin recipients (30,231 US dollars less per 100 patients). CAP-related hospitalizations, duration of hospital stay, and hospitalization costs for 7- to 10-day telithromycin--the approved dosing regimen for CAP--were significantly lower (p = 0.023, 0.025, and 0.025, respectively) than for clarithromycin. CONCLUSIONS: Data from this study indicate that telithromycin 800 mg once daily for 5, 7, or 10 days provides an effective therapy for patients with CAP, and may be associated with fewer CAP-related hospitalizations and hospital days than clarithromycin 500 mg twice daily for 10 days. Treatment with telithromycin could, therefore, potentially translate into cost savings in the management of CAP.

Adult↗
PubMed1999

Effect of clarithromycin and other macrolides on the sulfoxidation and 5-hydroxylation of lansoprazole in dogs.

The purpose of this study was to evaluate a possible interaction between lansoprazole and clarithromycin as well as other macrolides in dogs. Lansoprazole (30 mg) was orally administered to male beagle dogs, with or without oral pretreatment with 200-mg clarithromycin twice a day for 5 d. The experiments had a randomized cross-over design with a two-week washout period between dosing regimens. Clarithromycin pretreatment for 5 d resulted in a significant increase in the area under the serum lansoprazole concentration-time curve (AUC), whereas the area for a lansoprazole metabolite, lansoprazole sulfone, was significantly reduced, as was the maximum serum concentration (Cmax) of lansoprazole sulfone. When the effects of clarithromycin on the metabolism of lansoprazole were studied using dog liver microsomes, it was found that clarithromycin significantly inhibited the formation of lansoprazole sulfone but not another metabolite, 5-hydroxylansoprazole. These results suggest that co-medication of lansoprazole with clarithromycin may produce a synergistic effect caused by the increased serum levels of lansoprazole of benefit in Helicobacter pylori eradication.

2-Pyridinylmethylsulfinylbenzimidazoles↗
PubMed1999

A retrospective study of the addition of ciprofloxacin to clarithromycin and ethambutol in the treatment of disseminated Mycobacterium avium complex infection.

Disseminated Mycobacterium avium complex (DMAC) infection is associated with increased morbidity and mortality in HIV-infected individuals. The combination antibiotic regimens containing clarithromycin can decrease symptoms and improve survival in patients with DMAC, however, optimal therapy remains to be defined. Quinolones have been widely used in the treatment of DMAC but their utility has not been established. A retrospective cohort study of DMAC infection was established in a metropolitan hospital providing comprehensive care to over 3000 HIV-infected individuals. Medical records of patients with DMAC diagnosed at the Parkland Memorial Hospital from 1991 to 1994 were reviewed for therapeutic regimens for DMAC, concomitant therapy for HIV and Pneumocystis carinii prophylaxis and date of death. Subjects were included if they were treated with clarithromycin and ethambutol. Cases were defined as those patients who received more than 30 days of ciprofloxacin as therapy for DMAC in addition to the other drugs that they received. The primary endpoint was the time to death from the data of DMAC diagnosis. Covariates effecting survival were analysed through the Cox proportional hazards model. Eighty-nine subjects with DMAC who were treated with clarithromycin and ethambutol were identified. Fifty-eight received ciprofloxacin in addition to clarithromycin and ethambutol. The time to death was significantly better in those subjects who were treated with ciprofloxacin than those who were not (489 days vs 281 days, P=0.01). The sole significant predictor of improved survival on Cox proportional hazards model was ciprofloxacin therapy. Subjects treated with combination of clarithromycin, ethambutol and ciprofloxacin had improved survival over those treated with clarithromycin and ethambutol alone.

Anti-Bacterial Agents↗
PubMed2001

Effect of levofloxacin on theophylline clearance during theophylline and clarithromycin combination therapy.

OBJECTIVE: To report a case of decreased theophylline clearance by the addition of levofloxacin in a patient receiving theophylline and clarithromycin. CASE SUMMARY: A 59-year-old Japanese man who was receiving theophylline for emphysema experienced stimulation, insomnia, and tachycardia due to theophylline toxicity after clarithromycin and levofloxacin were added to the regimen. The combination of these agents resulted in a decrease in theophylline clearance to approximately 60% of the initial value obtained while the patient was receiving theophylline alone. The adverse effects disappeared after the dosage was reduced and the theophylline serum concentration decreased; however, there was no change in theophylline clearance. After discontinuation of levofloxacin, the theophylline serum concentration decreased, and theophylline clearance returned to the initial level even though clarithromycin was continued. DISCUSSION: Levofloxacin is believed not to influence the clearance of theophylline, although some new fluoroquinolones have been reported to do so. This case indicates that levofloxacin and clarithromycin inhibited theophylline metabolic pathways catalyzed by both CYP1A2 and CYP3A4 and resulted in the decrease in theophylline clearance. The clearance of theophylline, therefore, is not influenced by clarithromycin alone. CONCLUSIONS: Careful monitoring is required when levofloxacin is prescribed for patients who are taking clarithromycin with theophylline.

Anti-Infective Agents↗