SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Black or African American”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

SourceResearch connectionFrom yearThrough year

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

1,787 records · Page 20Linked to original sources

PubMed2026

Clinical insights into catathrenia: A real-world analysis from a tertiary sleep center.

INTRODUCTION: Catathrenia is a rare sleep-related breathing disorder marked by groaning during prolonged expiration, often underrecognized or misdiagnosed as obstructive or central sleep apnoea (OSA or CSA) or parasomnia. Understanding its clinical and polysomnographic features is essential for accurate diagnosis and management. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed a retrospective observational study of adult patients diagnosed with catathrenia at Serviço de Medicina do Sono de Coimbra. Diagnosis was established by attended overnight polysomnography (PSG) with synchronised audio-video recording. Demographic data, symptoms, comorbidities, PSG variables, treatment modalities, and outcomes were reviewed. Catathrenia events were defined as deep inhalation followed by prolonged exhalation with monotonous groaning. RESULTS: Ten patients were included. Median age was 46 years (range 27-78), mostly female (70%). Common comorbidities included obesity (n = 4), depression (n = 2), Parkinson's disease (n = 1), and restless legs syndrome (n = 1). Six patients (60%) had concomitant obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA). Seven patients had excessive daytime sleepiness (Epworth Sleepiness Scale > 10). All catathrenia episodes occurred exclusively during REM sleep. Continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) therapy was the most frequently used treatment and was associated with objective or subjective improvement in most patients. Two patients experienced spontaneous remission. CONCLUSION: Catathrenia remains underdiagnosed and can mimic other sleep disorders. Recognition of its REM-sleep predominance and PSG pattern is essential. Individualised treatment, often involving PAP therapy, may improve symptoms and patient outcomes.

Humans↗

PubMed2026

Risk factors and management strategies for needle disengagement from the visual field in pediatric robot-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to identify risk factors for suture needle disengagement from the visual field during pediatric robot-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty (RALP) and propose effective strategies for prevention and management. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study analyzed clinical data from 339 pediatric patients who underwent RALP for ureteropelvic junction obstruction (UPJO) at a single institution between August 2017 and December 2020. Patients were categorized based on the occurrence of needle disengagement from the visual field. Various patient demographics and surgical procedural factors were evaluated. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression, along with LASSO regression, identified independent risk and protective factors. RESULTS: Needle disengagement occurred in 38 (11.21%) of 339 cases. Multivariate logistic regression identified five independent risk factors for needle disengagement: use of a 3-mm auxiliary trocar (OR = 4.69, 95% CI: 1.98-12.53, P < 0.001), non-standard needle holder use (OR = 2.32, 95% CI: 1.04-5.18, P = 0.038), unshaped suture needles (OR = 3.16, 95% CI: 1.44-7.19, P = 0.005), simultaneous use of ≥2 intra-abdominal sutures (OR = 2.46, 95% CI: 1.15-5.48, P = 0.023), and clamping the needle shank during withdrawal (OR = 3.42, 95% CI: 1.40-8.21, P = 0.006). Conversely, sufficient assistant experience (>10 cases) was identified as a protective factor (OR = 0.39, 95% CI: 0.18-0.88, P = 0.021). CONCLUSION: Suture needle disengagement from the visual field during pediatric RALP is associated with specific technical and instrumental factors. Implementing targeted strategies-such as mandating specialized needle holders, preoperative needle shaping, a single-needle workflow, prioritizing clamping the suture thread over the needle shank during withdrawal, and ensuring adequate assistant training-has the potential to significantly reduce significantly mitigate the risk of needle loss and enhance overall surgical safety in pediatric RALP.

Humans↗

PubMed2026

Cardiorespiratory training for people with stroke.

RATIONALE: Low levels of cardiorespiratory fitness are common after stroke and are associated with post-stroke disability and increased risk of secondary stroke. Cardiorespiratory training interventions aim to increase cardiorespiratory fitness, improve physical function, reduce disability, and help prevent future strokes. Clinical guidelines recommend exercise as part of lifestyle modification for secondary prevention, and strongly recommend exercise for rehabilitation. This review is one of three reviews that were originally a single review on physical fitness training for stroke. OBJECTIVES: The primary objective of this review was to determine whether cardiorespiratory training after stroke has an effect on death, disability, adverse events, risk factors, fitness, walking, and indices of physical function when compared to a non-exercise control. SEARCH METHODS: In April 2025, we searched nine bibliographic databases and two trials registers to identify studies for inclusion in the review. We checked reference lists, tracked citations, and contacted experts. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: We included randomised controlled trials comparing cardiorespiratory training interventions with usual care, no intervention, or a non-exercise intervention in people with stroke. OUTCOMES: Our critical outcomes were death, disability, adverse events, risk factors, fitness, walking, and indices of physical function, assessed at the end of the intervention and the end of the longest follow-up. RISK OF BIAS: We used the Cochrane RoB 1 tool to assess the risk of bias in the included studies. SYNTHESIS METHODS: The studies evaluated different comparisons (e.g. cardiorespiratory training versus no intervention/waiting list control or versus attention control or versus usual care), which we synthesised into a single comparison: cardiorespiratory training versus control. We used random-effects meta-analysis on arm-level data (risk difference (RD) for dichotomous data, and mean difference (MD) or standardised mean difference (SMD) for continuous data, with 95% confidence intervals (CIs)). For outcome data that we did not meta-analyse, we followed Synthesis Without Meta-analysis (SWiM) guidance. We used GRADE to assess the certainty of the evidence for critical outcomes. INCLUDED STUDIES: We included 53 studies (2672 participants, with an average age of 61.9 years). Most studies recruited ambulatory participants in the early subacute (7 days to 3 months) or chronic (> 6 months) phases of recovery. Exercise duration recommendations were met in 49 studies, and frequency recommendations in 48. Twenty-eight studies lacked balanced exposure between groups. Programme duration was 12 weeks or more in 16 studies (maximum: 24 weeks). Sixteen studies had a post-intervention follow-up period (12 weeks to 12 months from baseline). One study planned a six-month follow-up but did not report it. SYNTHESIS OF RESULTS: Cardiorespiratory training does not increase or decrease deaths at the end of intervention (RD 0.00, 95% CI -0.01 to 0.01; 36 studies, 1563 participants; high-certainty evidence) or the end of follow-up (RD -0.00, 95% CI -0.02 to 0.02; 10 studies, 713 participants; high-certainty evidence). Cardiorespiratory training may improve indices of disability slightly at the end of intervention (SMD 0.35, 95% CI 0.12 to 0.57; 17 studies, 1073 participants; very low-certainty evidence), but the evidence is very uncertain. Re-expressed using the Barthel Index (0 to 20), the equivalent effect is MD 1.68, 95% CI 0.59 to 2.74. It is unclear if the effect is clinically meaningful (the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) is +1.85). The effect is unclear at the end of follow-up (SMD -0.14, 95% CI -0.36 to 0.08; 5 studies, 347 participants; low-certainty evidence). Cardiorespiratory training does not increase or decrease the incidence of secondary cardiovascular or cerebrovascular events at the end of intervention (RD -0.00, 95% CI -0.03 to 0.02; 8 studies, 544 participants; high-certainty evidence) and probably does not affect them at the end of follow-up (RD -0.02, 95% CI -0.08 to 0.04; 4 studies, 412 participants; moderate-certainty evidence). It is very uncertain whether cardiorespiratory training affects systolic blood pressure (mmHg) at the end of intervention (MD -2.12, 95% CI -5.81 to 1.57; 9 studies, 535 participants; very low-certainty evidence) (MCID -2 mmHg) or follow-up (MD 0.93, 95% CI -4.30 to 6.16; 3 studies, 155 participants; very low-certainty evidence); the 95% CIs include the MCID. Cardiorespiratory training probably results in a slight improvement in cardiorespiratory fitness (VO2 ml/kg/min) at the end of intervention (MD 2.37, 95% CI 1.39 to 3.36; 13 studies, 608 participants; moderate-certainty evidence); it is unclear if the effect is clinically meaningful (MCID +3.5 ml/kg/min). The effect may be similar at the end of follow-up (MD 2.76, 95% CI 1.36 to 4.16; 5 studies, 237 participants; low-certainty evidence). Subgroup analysis favoured longer interventions. Cardiorespiratory training probably results in a slight increase in comfortable walking speed (metres per second) at the end of intervention (MD 0.08, 95% CI 0.04 to 0.12; 16 studies, 647 participants; moderate-certainty evidence), but the effect is not clinically meaningful (MCID +0.13). The effect is unclear at the end of follow-up (MD 0.02, 95% CI -0.05 to 0.10; 3 studies, 182 participants; low-certainty evidence). Cardiorespiratory training may improve indices of balance at the end of intervention (SMD 0.31, 95% CI 0.15 to 0.47; 18 studies, 772 participants; very low-certainty evidence), but the evidence is very uncertain. Re-expressing using the Berg Balance Scale, the equivalent effect is MD 2.09, 95% CI 1.10 to 3.07; and it is unclear if it is clinically meaningful (MCID of +2). The effect is unclear at the end of follow-up (MD 0.90, 95% CI -1.32 to 3.12; 6 studies, 253 participants; low-certainty evidence). Overall, our certainty about the evidence is limited for most outcomes by imprecision (small number of studies and participants) or risks of bias (e.g. imbalanced exposure doses) or both. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: Cardiorespiratory training after stroke does not affect mortality or the incidence of secondary events at the end of the aerobic exercise training programme or end of follow-up. It may increase fitness, reduce disability, increase walking speed, and improve balance at the end of intervention, but it is unclear if these improvements are clinically meaningful. Further well-designed randomised trials are needed to fully understand the potential benefits and long-term effects of cardiorespiratory training and the optimal exercise prescription. FUNDING: No dedicated funding REGISTRATION: Protocol (and previous versions) available via DOI 10.1002/14651858.CD003316.

Humans↗

PubMed2026

Presentation, management, and outcomes of anterior inferior cerebellar artery dissecting and fusiform aneurysms: a systematic review and institutional case series.

Dissecting and fusiform aneurysms of the anterior inferior cerebellar artery (AICA) are rare and poorly characterized lesions. This study provides a comprehensive patient-level synthesis to date, combining a systematic review with institutional data to describe their clinical presentation, diagnostic workup, management strategies, and outcomes. A systematic review was conducted according to PRISMA guidelines. Studies were included if they reported on dissecting or fusiform AICA aneurysms. Individual patient data were extracted and supplemented with a single-institution case series. Outcomes, complications, and radiological evolution were analyzed descriptively. Forty-nine patients from 36 studies and 6 patients from our institution were included in this study. In the systematic review cohort, most aneurysms presented with subarachnoid hemorrhage (n = 38/49, 77.6%). Compressive cranial neuropathies, particularly including the vestibulocochlear system, were common in patients with unruptured aneurysms. Diagnosis often required digital subtraction angiography after the initial non-invasive imaging. Endovascular treatment, most commonly parent artery occlusion, was employed in 61.2% (n = 30/49) of cases. However, ischemic complications occurred in 23.3% (n = 7/30), especially in proximal (A1-A2) lesions. Bypass surgery was reported selectively for proximal aneurysms with inadequate collateral flow. As an alternative surgical approach, decompression or trapping was pursued based on aneurysm morphology or clinical context. Conservative management was typically reserved for select patients with poor-grade SAH, high procedural risk, or patient refusal of intervention. Overall, 81.4% (n = 35/43) of patients with available follow-up achieved good functional outcomes. Management of AICA dissecting and fusiform aneurysms is highly individualized. Endovascular approaches were frequently used to secure ruptured lesions or lesions considered at high risk, but periprocedural ischemic risk in perforator-rich segments remains a notable concern. Bypass procedures were reported in selected proximal aneurysms with limited collateralization. Conservative management was reserved for highly selected high-risk or anatomically inaccessible cases. Clinical trial registration: This study is not a clinical trial.

Humans↗

PubMed2025

Evaluation of Prevalence of Obstetric Violence and its Associated Factors: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Obstetric violence (OV) begins with a woman's initial contact with a health institution and can persist throughout pregnancy, labor, and the postpartum period. Despite this, previous research has largely focused on the labor process. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to determine the prevalence and associated factors of OV experienced by women during pregnancy, labor, or the postpartum period. We conducted systematic searches in five electronic databases (Web of Science, Scopus, CINAHL Ultimate, MEDLINE Ultimate, and OVID) between April 27 and August 7, 2024. Studies were included if they involved women aged 18 and above who experienced mistreatment, abuse, disrespect, or OV during pregnancy, childbirth, or the postpartum period; employed quantitative cohort, descriptive, or cross-sectional designs; were written in English; reported the prevalence of OV and/or associated factors; and were published between January 1, 2007 and December 31, 2023. Data synthesis involved meta-analysis, meta-regression, and narrative synthesis methods. A total of 41 studies, including 43,977 participants from 17 countries, were included. The meta-analysis revealed that the pooled prevalence of OV was 61.7% (95% CI [0.549, 0.680]; I²: 99.258%). The meta-regression analysis showed that variables such as the country of study, income level of countries, study setting, study design, and risk of bias had statistically significant effects on OV. In addition, 40 risk factors and 14 protective factors were identified through narrative synthesis. This highlights the high prevalence of OV and the need to address the associated factors.

Humans↗

PubMed2026

Effect of semaglutide on kidney outcomes in the SELECT, FLOW, and SOUL trials: a prespecified pooled analysis.

BACKGROUND: The GLP-1 receptor agonist semaglutide reduces clinically important kidney outcomes in people with type 2 diabetes and chronic kidney disease (CKD). We aimed to assess the pooled effects of semaglutide on kidney outcomes in prespecified analyses of participant-level data from the diverse populations of the SELECT, FLOW, and SOUL randomised placebo-controlled trials. METHODS: Participants with CKD (FLOW) or atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (SELECT and SOUL) were randomly assigned semaglutide (once-weekly subcutaneous 1·0 mg [FLOW], once-weekly subcutaneous 2·4 mg [SELECT], or once-daily oral 14 mg [SOUL]) or matching placebo, added to standard of care. The primary outcome in this pooled analysis was time to first occurrence of a kidney composite, defined as onset of persistent 50% or greater reduction in estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), kidney failure (persistent eGFR <15 mL/min per 1·73 m2, or initiation of kidney replacement therapy), kidney-related death, or cardiovascular-related death. Safety was also assessed. FINDINGS: The pooled participants from the trials (N=30 787) had a mean follow-up of 39·5-47·5 months. Among participants assigned to semaglutide, 973 first events of the primary kidney composite occurred compared with 1134 first events for placebo (hazard ratio [HR] 0·84 [95% CI 0·77-0·91]). First events of a narrower secondary kidney composite (excluding cardiovascular-related death from the primary outcome) were also reduced with semaglutide versus placebo (347 and 416, respectively; 0·80 [0·69-0·92]). Safety outcomes were overall similar between groups, and in line with other GLP-1 receptor agonist trials. Serious adverse events were numberically lower with semaglutide than with placebo. INTERPRETATION: Data pooled from three large phase 3 trials suggest that semaglutide reduces the risk of major kidney outcomes in a broad population with cardio-kidney-metabolic disease while having a favourable risk-benefit profile. In people with cardio-kidney-metabolic disease, with and without diabetes, semaglutide (oral or injected) prevents kidney-related and cardiovascular complications and induces adverse events in line with GLP-1 receptor agonist studies, regardless of baseline characteristics within the cardio-kidney-metabolic spectrum. This was a participant-level analysis conducted in a large database of three randomised controlled trials of similar design and examining the same treatment, but there were some differences in participants' baseline characteristics, and in the dose and route of administration of treatment. This pooled analysis adds evidence for the benefit of GLP-1 receptor agonists in general, and semaglutide in particular, in a broad population of people with cardio-kidney-metabolic disease, suggesting that the benefit of semaglutide might not be explained only by its glycaemic effects, weight-management effects, or both. FUNDING: Novo Nordisk.

Humans↗

PubMed2026

Atopic dermatitis and the risk of osteoporosis and fractures: a meta-analysis of cohort studies.

BACKGROUND: This meta-analysis aims to evaluate the risk of osteoporosis and fractures in patients with atopic dermatitis (AD) by synthesizing data from cohort studies. We also provide a comprehensive analysis of fracture risks across different severities of AD and anatomical sites. METHODS: Following the PRISMA 2020 guidelines, a systematic search was conducted in PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library up to May 30, 2025. Studies that investigated the relationship between AD and osteoporosis or fractures were included in the analysis. Data extraction and screening were performed independently by two reviewers. Study quality was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS). A random-effects meta-analysis was applied, alongside sensitivity and subgroup analyses. Publication bias was evaluated using funnel plots and Egger's test. RESULTS: Ten cohort studies, involving 368 to over 2 million AD patients, were included. NOS scores ranged from 7 to 8, indicating generally high study quality. The pooled analysis revealed a 56% increased risk of osteoporosis (OR = 1.56, 95% CI: 1.14-2.13; I2 = 99.9%, p < 0.0001) and an 8% increased risk of all-cause fractures (OR = 1.08, 95% CI: 1.05-1.10; I2 = 82.1%, p < 0.0001) in AD patients. Subgroup analyses demonstrated a progressive increase in fracture risk with the severity of AD. Specific risks were significantly higher for vertebral fractures (OR = 1.14, 95% CI: 1.08-1.20; I2 = 67.3%, p = 0.009) and lower limb fractures (OR = 1.11, 95% CI: 1.08-1.13; I2 = 65.0%, p = 0.014). Sensitivity analyses confirmed the robustness of these findings, and no significant publication bias was detected (p = 0.316). CONCLUSION: AD is associated with an increased risk of osteoporosis and fractures, particularly among patients with severe AD and those experiencing vertebral or lower limb fractures. These findings highlight the importance of targeted bone health monitoring in the clinical management of AD patients.Registration: (PROSPERO: CRD420251066550).

Humans↗

PubMed2026

Analyzing the impact of subcutaneous injection needle, device, and administration characteristics on patient pain, anxiety, and safety: a systematic literature review.

The subcutaneous (SC) injection route is a commonly used and important method for therapeutic delivery of a wide range of compounds, and needle characteristics have a significant influence on patient pain, anxiety, safety, and other outcomes. This systematic review evaluates the evidence on how needle-specific characteristics (e.g. gauge, length, tip design, wall thickness, concealment) and administration- or device-related factors can affect patient-reported outcomes and clinical safety indicators during and following SC injections. A comprehensive search was conducted in MEDLINE, PubMed, Embase, and ClinicalTrials.gov in June 2024. Studies were included if they assessed the relationship between needle characteristics and pain, anxiety, safety, or related outcomes in individuals receiving SC injections. A dual-reviewer process was used for study selection, data extraction, and quality assessment. Sixty-two studies met inclusion criteria. Evidence consistently indicated that thinner and shorter needles reduced patient-reported pain and adverse events such as bruising and bleeding. Tapered and lubricated needles, hidden or retractable needle designs, and use of autoinjectors or prefilled syringes also contributed to reduced anxiety and improved user satisfaction. However, results were heterogeneous, and many studies lacked sufficient power or single-variable evaluation of individual needle parameters, limiting definitive conclusions. Needle characteristics significantly influence patient experience and safety with SC delivery. While both clinical evidence and practical experience clearly favor thinner, shorter, and concealed needles, further standardized, high-quality research is needed to isolate and quantify the specific contributions of individual needle characteristics to optimize injection practices and support patient-centered device design.

Humans↗

PubMed2026

Associations between prescribed amphetamines and spontaneous cervical artery dissection: a matched case-control study.

AIMS: To assess whether prescribed amphetamines are associated with spontaneous cervical artery dissection (sCeAD), an important cause of stroke in young adults. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective matched case-control study within a large academic health system in Chicago, Illinois. Adults aged 18-85 years with incident sCeAD were matched 1:4 to controls without dissection on age, sex, and race/ethnicity. The primary exposure was documented amphetamine prescription. Conditional logistic regression was used to estimate adjusted odds ratios (ORs) controlling for relevant vascular and clinical covariates. Sensitivity analyses included strict matched-strata and inverse probability-weighted models. RESULTS: Among 11,463 individuals, including 2,293 cases and 9,170 controls, amphetamine exposure was associated with higher odds of sCeAD (adjusted OR 1.70, 95% CI 1.18-2.46). Results were unchanged in strictly matched strata (OR 1.70, 95% CI 1.18-2.46) and remained directionally consistent after inverse probability weighting (OR 1.40, 95% CI 1.09-1.79). High-dose amphetamine exposure (≥30 mg/day) had the strongest association (OR 1.96, 95% CI 1.18-3.26), whereas low-dose exposure was not statistically significant. CONCLUSION: Prescribed amphetamines were associated with modestly increased odds of sCeAD. While these findings are observational and hypothesis-generating, they may support a possible association in susceptible patients.

Humans↗

PubMed2026

Minimally invasive versus open abdominoperineal resection and the risk of postoperative perineal hernia: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: The impact of minimally invasive surgery on the risk of postoperative perineal hernia after abdominoperineal resection (APR) or extralevator abdominoperineal excision (ELAPE) remains uncertain. This study compares perineal hernia rates and perioperative outcomes between minimally invasive and open approaches. METHODS: PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library were searched through June 2026. Pooled odds ratios (ORs) and mean differences (MDs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using random-effects models. A Bayesian meta-analysis was additionally performed for the primary outcome. RESULTS: Four comparative observational studies involving 763 patients were included; 249 underwent minimally invasive APR/ELAPE, and 514 underwent open APR/ELAPE. Postoperative perineal hernia was significantly more frequent following minimally invasive surgery (OR 4.13; 95% CI 2.24-7.61; p < 0.001). Intraoperative blood loss was significantly lower in the minimally invasive group (MD - 156.5 mL; 95% CI - 298.4 to - 14.5; p = 0.03), as was operative time (MD - 41.7 min; 95% CI - 60.8 to - 22.5; p < 0.01). No significant differences were observed in hospital stay (MD - 2.5 days; 95% CI - 5.4 to 0.4; p = 0.09) or 30-day readmission rates (OR 1.41; 95% CI 0.82-2.42; p = 0.209). Bayesian analysis yielded a posterior mean OR of 4.04 (95% CrI 1.96-8.36), corresponding to a 99.9% posterior probability that minimally invasive surgery increases the risk of postoperative perineal hernia. CONCLUSION: Minimally invasive APR/ELAPE was associated with an increased risk of postoperative perineal hernia compared with the open approach. Strategies to reduce this complication while preserving the benefits of minimally invasive surgery warrant further investigation.

Humans↗

PubMed2026

A randomized trial of viral vector and adjuvanted protein HBV therapeutic vaccine in people with chronic hepatitis B on nucleos(t)ide analogs.

BACKGROUND: This study assessed the safety, efficacy, and immunogenicity of a therapeutic immunization strategy aimed at reaching a functional cure for chronic hepatitis B (CHB), relying on a heterologous prime-boost with viral vectors ChAd155-hIi-HBV and MVA-HBV, combined with sequential or concomitant administration of adjuvanted recombinant HBV proteins (HBc-HBs/AS01B). METHODS: This single-blind, randomized, controlled, first-in-human, phase 1/2 trial enrolled adults aged 18-65 years with HBeAg-negative CHB, virally suppressed on nucleos(t)ide analogs (NAs), with HBsAg >50 IU/mL. Participants received NAs and the following regimens of 4 doses (8-week intervals): sequential administration of ChAd155-hIi-HBV, MVA-HBV, and 2 HBc-HBs/AS01B doses; co-administration of ChAd155-hIi-HBV+HBc-HBs/AS01B, followed by 3 co-administered MVA-HBV+HBc-HBs/AS01B doses; 4 HBc-HBs/AS01B doses; 2 placebo doses followed by ChAd155-hIi-HBV and MVA-HBV administered alone or with HBc-HBs/AS01B; or 4 placebo doses. Safety, efficacy (≥1-log decrease in quantitative (q)HBsAg or HBsAg loss 24 weeks post-dose 4 [day (D)337]), antibody, and T-cell responses were evaluated. RESULTS: In all, 134 participants were vaccinated. Grade 3 solicited adverse events (AEs) (median duration: 2-3 days) were more frequent after co-administration (systemic: 59.3%; administration-site: 33.3%) than sequential administration (systemic: 10.3%; administration-site: 12.8%) of high-dose viral vectors and proteins. No vaccine-related or fatal serious AEs were reported. After 4 doses, no participant had HBsAg loss or ≥1-log decrease in qHBsAg (D337 vs. D1). Co-administration induced the strongest anti-HBs response (73.7% achieved anti-HBs ≥10 mIU/mL 2 weeks post-dose 4 vs. 40.0% after sequential administration). Both sequential and co-administration induced HBc-specific CD4+ and CD8+ T-cell responses, with a prime-boost effect of the viral vectors. CONCLUSIONS: Heterologous prime-boost with ChAd155-hIi-HBV and MVA-HBV, combined with sequential or co-administration of HBc-HBs/AS01B, had an acceptable safety profile, were moderately immunogenic, but no participants showed the expected efficacy outcome.

Humans↗

PubMed2026

Magnesium sulphate for women at risk of preterm birth for neuroprotection of the fetus.

BACKGROUND: Magnesium sulphate is a common therapy in perinatal care. Its benefits when given to women at risk of preterm birth for fetal neuroprotection (prevention of cerebral palsy for children) were shown in a 2009 Cochrane review. Internationally, use of magnesium sulphate for preterm cerebral palsy prevention is now recommended practice. As new randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and longer-term follow-up of prior RCTs have since been conducted, this review updates the previously published version. OBJECTIVES: To assess the effectiveness and safety of magnesium sulphate as a fetal neuroprotective agent when given to women considered to be at risk of preterm birth. SEARCH METHODS: We searched Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth's Trials Register, ClinicalTrials.gov, and the World Health Organization (WHO) International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (ICTRP) on 17 March 2023, as well as reference lists of retrieved studies. SELECTION CRITERIA: We included RCTs and cluster-RCTs of women at risk of preterm birth that assessed prenatal magnesium sulphate for fetal neuroprotection compared with placebo or no treatment. All methods of administration (intravenous, intramuscular, and oral) were eligible. We did not include studies where magnesium sulphate was used with the primary aim of preterm labour tocolysis, or the prevention and/or treatment of eclampsia. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two review authors independently assessed RCTs for inclusion, extracted data, and assessed risk of bias and trustworthiness. Dichotomous data were presented as summary risk ratios (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI), and continuous data were presented as mean differences with 95% CI. We assessed the certainty of the evidence using the GRADE approach. MAIN RESULTS: We included six RCTs (5917 women and their 6759 fetuses alive at randomisation). All RCTs were conducted in high-income countries. The RCTs compared magnesium sulphate with placebo in women at risk of preterm birth at less than 34 weeks' gestation; however, treatment regimens and inclusion/exclusion criteria varied. Though the RCTs were at an overall low risk of bias, the certainty of evidence ranged from high to very low, due to concerns regarding study limitations, imprecision, and inconsistency. Primary outcomes for infants/children: Up to two years' corrected age, magnesium sulphate compared with placebo reduced cerebral palsy (RR 0.71, 95% CI 0.57 to 0.89; 6 RCTs, 6107 children; number needed to treat for additional beneficial outcome (NNTB) 60, 95% CI 41 to 158) and death or cerebral palsy (RR 0.87, 95% CI 0.77 to 0.98; 6 RCTs, 6481 children; NNTB 56, 95% CI 32 to 363) (both high-certainty evidence). Magnesium sulphate probably resulted in little to no difference in death (fetal, neonatal, or later) (RR 0.96, 95% CI 0.82 to 1.13; 6 RCTs, 6759 children); major neurodevelopmental disability (RR 1.09, 95% CI 0.83 to 1.44; 1 RCT, 987 children); or death or major neurodevelopmental disability (RR 0.95, 95% CI 0.85 to 1.07; 3 RCTs, 4279 children) (all moderate-certainty evidence). At early school age, magnesium sulphate may have resulted in little to no difference in death (fetal, neonatal, or later) (RR 0.82, 95% CI 0.66 to 1.02; 2 RCTs, 1758 children); cerebral palsy (RR 0.99, 95% CI 0.69 to 1.41; 2 RCTs, 1038 children); death or cerebral palsy (RR 0.90, 95% CI 0.67 to 1.20; 1 RCT, 503 children); and death or major neurodevelopmental disability (RR 0.81, 95% CI 0.59 to 1.12; 1 RCT, 503 children) (all low-certainty evidence). Magnesium sulphate may also have resulted in little to no difference in major neurodevelopmental disability, but the evidence is very uncertain (average RR 0.92, 95% CI 0.53 to 1.62; 2 RCTs, 940 children; very low-certainty evidence). Secondary outcomes for infants/children: Magnesium sulphate probably resulted in little to no difference in severe intraventricular haemorrhage (grade 3 or 4) (RR 0.81, 95% CI 0.64 to 1.04; 6 RCTs, 6542 infants; moderate-certainty evidence) and may have resulted in little to no difference in chronic lung disease/bronchopulmonary dysplasia (average RR 0.92, 95% CI 0.77 to 1.10; 5 RCTs, 6689 infants; low-certainty evidence). Primary outcomes for women: Magnesium sulphate may have resulted in little or no difference in severe maternal outcomes potentially related to treatment (death, cardiac arrest, respiratory arrest) (RR 0.32, 95% CI 0.01 to 7.92; 4 RCTs, 5300 women; low-certainty evidence). However, magnesium sulphate probably increased maternal adverse effects severe enough to stop treatment (average RR 3.21, 95% CI 1.88 to 5.48; 3 RCTs, 4736 women; moderate-certainty evidence). Secondary outcomes for women: Magnesium sulphate probably resulted in little to no difference in caesarean section (RR 0.96, 95% CI 0.91 to 1.02; 5 RCTs, 5861 women) and postpartum haemorrhage (RR 0.94, 95% CI 0.80 to 1.09; 2 RCTs, 2495 women) (both moderate-certainty evidence). Breastfeeding at hospital discharge and women's views of treatment were not reported. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: The currently available evidence indicates that magnesium sulphate for women at risk of preterm birth for neuroprotection of the fetus, compared with placebo, reduces cerebral palsy, and death or cerebral palsy, in children up to two years' corrected age. Magnesium sulphate may result in little to no difference in outcomes in children at school age. While magnesium sulphate may result in little to no difference in severe maternal outcomes (death, cardiac arrest, respiratory arrest), it probably increases maternal adverse effects severe enough to stop treatment. Further research is needed on the longer-term benefits and harms for children, into adolescence and adulthood. Additional studies to determine variation in effects by characteristics of women treated and magnesium sulphate regimens used, along with the generalisability of findings to low- and middle-income countries, should be considered.

Humans↗

PubMed2026

Predictive value of anal sphincter electromyography for sacral neuromodulation test-phase outcomes.

BACKGROUND: Sacral neuromodulation (SNM) is an established therapy for refractory pelvic organ dysfunction. Anal sphincter electromyography (EMG) is commonly used preoperatively to assess sacral and peripheral nerve integrity. However, the prognostic significance of chronic neurogenic EMG changes for SNM outcomes remains unclear. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate whether chronic neurogenic changes on preoperative anal sphincter EMG predict the outcome of the SNM test phase. METHODS: We retrospectively analysed 62 consecutive patients with bladder and/or bowel dysfunction or pelvic pain who were candidates for SNM treatment and who underwent preoperative anal sphincter EMG. EMG findings were classified as normal or showing chronic neurogenic changes. SNM test-phase success was defined as a ≥50% improvement of symptoms at 24 days. Outcomes were compared between EMG groups. RESULTS: Of the 62 patients (49 women, 13 men), 30 (48%) had normal EMG findings and 32 (52%) showed chronic neurogenic changes. Overall, the SNM test phase was successful in 47 patients (76%). Success rates were similar in patients with normal EMG (72%) and neurogenic EMG changes (79%), with no statistically significant difference (p = 0.878). Sex-stratified analyses revealed no significant association between EMG findings and test-phase success in women or men. CONCLUSIONS: Chronic neurogenic changes on anal sphincter EMG do not predict SNM test-phase outcomes. These findings suggest that abnormal sphincter EMG results should not be used as a standalone criterion to exclude patients from SNM therapy. SIGNIFICANCE: Signs of neurogenic damage on anal sphincter EMG are not an indicator of reduced neuromodulatory capacity or diminished clinical response to SNM.

Humans↗

PubMed2026

Treatment of Hot Flashes in Men With Prostate Cancer Undergoing Androgen Deprivation Therapy.

BACKGROUND: Hot flashes are common and often debilitating side effects of castration therapy; a cornerstone in the treatment of metastatic prostate cancer (PCa) as well as in localized or locally advanced PCa when combined with radiotherapy. The evidence for relieving vasomotor symptoms is limited. This systematic review presents both pharmacological and non-pharmacological interventions for treating hot flashes in men with PCa undergoing castration therapy, primarily androgen deprivation therapy (ADT). METHODS: a systematic literature search was conducted in PubMed using ("hot flash*" OR "hot flush*" OR "vasomotor*") AND ("prostate") as keywords. Studies with intervention for hot flashes due to castration therapy, estimation of treatment response (e.g., reduction in frequency or impact on quality of life) and patients with PCa (any stage) were eligible. RESULTS: Of 469 papers, 35 were included in the review. The included studies evaluated cyproterone acetate, estrogen or estrogen derivatives, progesterone derivatives, selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs), gabapentin, oxybutynin, and clonidine, as well as non-pharmacological interventions such as acupuncture, cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT), and dietary supplements (e.g., Dong Quai/Angelica Sinensis, Serelys Homme, soy protein, and Salvia officinalis). Across all blinded pharmacological interventions, the relative reduction in hot flash frequency ranged from -21% to -84%, and the placebo effect was between -19% and -30%. CONCLUSION: Hormonal agents such as cyproterone acetate and estrogen appear to be the most effective treatments, although they are associated with side effects. Non-pharmacological options like acupuncture and CBT may offer some benefit, while dietary supplements seem to be ineffective. Future studies are needed also to evaluate newer treatments, such as fezolinetant, in this patient population.

Humans↗

PubMed2026

Intensive glycemic control in adults aged 80 years and older: A randomized trial evaluating diabetes complications and competing mortality.

AIMS: To evaluate whether intensive glycemic control reduces microvascular or macrovascular events compared with conservative glycemic targets in independently ambulatory adults aged 80 years or older with type 2 diabetes. METHODS: We conducted a prospective, randomized, open-label, single-center trial enrolling independently ambulatory adults aged ≥ 80 years with type 2 diabetes. Participants were assigned (1:1) to an intensive glycemic target (HbA1c < 7 %) or a conservative target (HbA1c < 9 %) and followed for 5 years. Primary outcomes were composite microvascular and macrovascular events. Analyses were done by intention to treat. Cause-specific Cox models and Fine-Gray subdistribution hazard models were used to account for all-cause mortality as a competing event. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT00850798. FINDINGS: 206 participants were randomly assigned to intensive (n = 102) or conservative (n = 104) treatment. At 5 years, mean HbA1c was lower in the intensive group than in the conservative group (7·42 % vs 8·21 %; p = 0·005). Intensive therapy did not reduce microvascular events (hazard ratio [HR] 1·24, 95 % CI 0·76-2·04) or macrovascular events (HR 1·02, 0·36-2·92). Competing risk analyses showed no reduction in cumulative incidence of vascular outcomes (subdistribution HR approximately 1·0 for both). The cumulative incidence of death exceeded that of vascular events, indicating that many participants died before potential glycemic benefits could be realized. Severe hypoglycemia requiring hospitalization was more frequent with intensive therapy (7 vs 1 event). INTERPRETATION: In adults aged 80 years or older with type 2 diabetes, intensive glycaemic control improved glycaemic levels but did not reduce vascular events and increased the risk of severe hypoglycaemia. High competing mortality substantially limits the potential long-term benefit of intensive treatment, supporting conservative and individualized glycemic targets in very old adults. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00850798.

Aged, 80 and over↗

PubMed2026

Thymosin-ɑ1 for people with chronic hepatitis B.

RATIONALE: Chronic hepatitis B is a global public health concern. It is caused by infection with the hepatitis B virus (HBV). The goal of treating chronic HBV infection is to prevent progression to chronic hepatitis, cirrhosis, hepatic decompensation, liver failure, hepatocellular carcinoma, and death. Individual studies have evaluated various immunomodulatory therapies with inconsistent results. Thymosin-ɑ1 is known to have antiviral effects; however, results of randomised clinical trials on the effects of thymosin-α1 as a potential treatment for people with chronic HBV have been inconsistent. OBJECTIVES: To assess the benefits and harms of thymosin-ɑ1 therapy in people with chronic hepatitis B. SEARCH METHODS: We searched the Cochrane Hepato-Biliary Group Controlled Trials Register, CENTRAL, MEDLINE, four other databases and six trials registers, in addition to reference checking, citation searching, and contacting study authors to identify trials for inclusion. The latest search date was 10 June 2026. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) that evaluated thymosin-α1 at any dose, route of administration, or formulation type, in people with chronic hepatitis B regardless of age, sex, or ethnicity. Thymosin-α1 could have been administered as monotherapy, in combination with an additional drug, or in addition to standard medical treatment and compared with placebo, no intervention, the same additional drug, or the same standard medical treatment. OUTCOMES: Our critical outcomes were all-cause mortality, serious adverse events, and health-related quality of life. Among our important outcomes were HBV-related morbidity, HBV-related mortality, non-serious adverse events, and the proportion of people without histological improvements. RISK OF BIAS: We used the Cochrane Risk of bias 2 tool (RoB 2) to assess risk of bias. SYNTHESIS METHODS: We followed Cochrane methods. We conducted meta-analyses for predefined outcomes using data from the longest follow-up period, irrespective of the risk of bias judgements. We presented dichotomous outcome results as risk ratios (RRs) and continuous outcome results as mean differences, with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) at their longest follow-ups. We used the random-effects model for our primary analyses. We used GRADE to assess the certainty of the evidence for each outcome. INCLUDED STUDIES: We included 10 RCTs conducted in Bangladesh, China, Italy, Korea, Singapore, and Taiwan, with 1349 randomised participants (range: 12 to 690; 1045 (77.5%) were male). Among the trials reporting age, none included participants younger than 17 years (age range: 17 to 75 years). The trials were published between 1991 and 2018, and assessed thymosin-ɑ1 in adults with chronic hepatitis B infection, with or without comorbidities. Only two trials mentioned comorbidities (cirrhosis and acute-on-chronic liver failure). The trials compared thymosin-ɑ1, with or without a cointervention, with placebo or no intervention, or with the same cointervention. The control interventions were placebos in two trials and no intervention in two. The remaining six trials administered co-interventions, such as interferon, pegylated interferon, lamivudine, and standard medical therapy (entecavir or tenofovir), and entecavir. Follow-ups ranged from six months to five years after the end of treatment (median: 12 months). Four trials were funded by industry, five by research grants, and one provided no information. All 10 trials (11 records) provided data on at least one outcome in our review. We identified no ongoing trials. Sixteen studies are awaiting assessment due to incomplete reporting. We received no responses to our enquiries. SYNTHESIS OF RESULTS: Thymosin-ɑ1, compared with the control interventions, may reduce all-cause mortality (RR 0.53, 95% CI 0.29 to 0.96; I² = 0%; 3 studies, 907 participants; very low-certainty evidence), serious adverse events (RR 0.72, 95% CI 0.53 to 0.99; I² = 0%; 5 studies, 1056 participants; low-certainty evidence), HBV-related mortality (RR 0.53, 95% CI 0.29 to 0.96; I² = 0%; 3 studies, 907 participants; very low-certainty evidence), non-serious adverse events (RR 0.47, 95% CI 0.27 to 0.83; I² = 0%; 5 studies, 300 participants; very low-certainty evidence), and may have little to no effect on health-related quality of life (MD 0.70, 95% CI -2.55 to 3.95; I² not applicable; 1 study, 161 participants; very low-certainty evidence; score range: 0 to 100; the higher the score, the better) and on histological improvement (RR 0.51, 95% CI 0.13 to 2.06; I² = 74%; 2 studies, 702 participants; very low-certainty evidence). The evidence is very uncertain about the effect of thymosin-ɑ1 on hepatitis B-related morbidity (RR 0.86, 95% CI 0.54 to 1.40; I² = 3%; 3 studies, 854 participants; very low-certainty evidence). We judged the certainty of evidence to be low for serious adverse events and very low for the remaining outcomes. Reasons for downgrading were mainly due to study limitations, including overall high or some concerns for risk of bias; imprecision of the pooled effect estimates (including wide or very wide confidence intervals crossing the line of no effect, and small participant numbers); and inconsistency due to substantial heterogeneity (I² = 74%). The test for subgroup differences provided no evidence of differences in effect according to thymosin‑α1 administration for any outcome (P ≥ 0.05). AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: We assessed the certainty of evidence as very low for all outcomes except for serious adverse events (low). Therefore, we are not sure whether thymosin-α1 monotherapy versus placebo or no intervention, or with the same co-interventions, reduces all-cause mortality, serious adverse events, HBV-related mortality, and non-serious adverse events, nor whether it has any effect on quality of life (based on one trial) and histological improvement. The effect of thymosin-ɑ1 on HBV-related morbidity is very uncertain. We observed no statistically significant differences between trials with and without cointerventions. We found no ongoing trials. FUNDING: This Cochrane review had no dedicated funding. REGISTRATION: Protocol available via DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD014610.

Humans↗

PubMed2026

Psychological impacts of APOE genotype disclosure among Latinos in New York City: a randomized controlled trial.

INTRODUCTION: Latinos face increased Alzheimer's disease (AD) risk but are underrepresented in studies of APOE genotype disclosure. We evaluated the psychological impacts of APOE disclosure in the Información de la Enfermedad de Alzheimer para Latinos (IDEAL) study, a randomized controlled trial among Latinos in New York City. METHODS: Latino northern Manhattan residents without self-reported AD (mean age 52, 69% women, 49% college graduates) were randomized in the period August 2021 to July 2024 to receive AD risk estimates to age 85 incorporating APOE genotype, family history, and ethnicity (disclosure) or the same factors excluding APOE (non-disclosure). Bilingual genetic counselors delivered risk estimates to both groups, unmasked to randomization. Follow-up surveys were completed 6 weeks, 9 months, and 15 months after risk delivery. Primary outcomes were impact of genetic testing in AD (IGT-AD) and Impact of Event Scale-Revised (IES-R). Secondary outcomes were changes from baseline in depression, anxiety, and perceived AD threat. Analyses used intention-to-treat with multiple imputation. RESULTS: Disclosure (N = 194) and non-disclosure (N = 180) groups did not differ on IGT-AD (mean disclosure-non-disclosure difference [MD] at 6 weeks: -1.5, p = 0.14; 9 months: -1.2, p = 0.35; 15 months: -2.0, p = 0.07), IES-R (MD at 6 weeks: 0.00, p = 0.98; 9 months: 0.01, p = 0.84; 15 months: 0.03, p = 0.64), or change in secondary outcomes. Occurrence of disclosure-related adverse events was similar in the disclosure (N = 2) and non-disclosure (N = 3) groups. DISCUSSION: In this Latino cohort, APOE disclosure did not have clinically significant adverse psychological effects, addressing an important evidence gap. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04471779.

Aged↗

PubMed2026

Preoperative Olanzapine and Quality of Recovery after Ambulatory Surgery: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

BACKGROUND: Postdischarge nausea and vomiting negatively impact recovery after surgery. Preoperative administration of 10 mg olanzapine decreases postdischarge nausea and vomiting but increases sedation. No data are available on the impact of olanzapine on global quality of recovery. METHODS: This was a single-center, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial in female patients 18 to 50 yr old undergoing ambulatory surgery during general anesthesia. Participants received 5 mg oral olanzapine or placebo in addition to antiemetic prophylaxis with dexamethasone and ondansetron. The primary outcome was Quality of Recovery-40 (QoR-40) on postoperative day (POD) 1. Secondary outcomes included QoR-40 on POD 2, postdischarge nausea (any and severe) through POD 2, and postanesthesia care unit length of stay. QoR-40 analyses used mixed-effects models adjusted for baseline preoperative QoR-40 scores. The group differences and corresponding 95% CI are reported. RESULTS: A total of 384 participants received olanzapine (n = 191) or placebo (n = 193). Compared with placebo, olanzapine was associated with higher QoR-40 scores on POD 1 (difference, 9.0 points; 95% CI, 6.1 to 11.8; P < 0.001). The POD 2 difference was 4.8 points (95% CI, 2.0 to 7.6; nominal P = 0.001), and this secondary outcome remained significant after false discovery rate correction. Olanzapine was associated with lower odds of any nausea (odds ratio [OR], 0.43; 95% CI, 0.28 to 0.66) and severe nausea (OR, 0.26; 95% CI, 0.14 to 0.48) on POD 1. On POD 2, olanzapine was associated with lower odds of any nausea (OR, 0.48; 95% CI, 0.30 to 0.76), but not severe nausea (OR, 0.65; 95% CI, 0.30 to 1.40). Postanesthesia care unit length of stay did not differ between groups. The significance of these prespecified secondary outcomes was unchanged after false discovery rate correction. CONCLUSIONS: When combined with dexamethasone and ondansetron, a single preoperative dose of 5 mg olanzapine improved global quality of recovery after discharge from ambulatory surgery.

Humans↗